Example aspects described herein relate generally to optical communication networks, and, more particularly, to intranodal reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexer (ROADM) fiber management apparatuses, and methods and systems employing the apparatuses.
Wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) optical networks are presently dominated by 10 gigabit per second (Gb/s) transmission on dispersion-managed fiber plants. Such networks are typically comprised of multiple nodes interconnected by WDM paths. Optical signals (also referred to interchangeably herein as “traffic”, “wavelengths”, and/or “channels”) that are communicated across WDM networks typically originate at a first endpoint (a source system) that is local to one of the nodes (e.g., by way of a transmitter portion of local transponder) and terminate at a second endpoint (a destination system) that is local to another one of the nodes (e.g., by way of a receiver portion of local transponder). In some cases traffic is communicated from a source system at a source node to a destination system at a destination node without traversing any intermediate nodes. In other cases traffic is communicated from a source system at a source node to a destination system at a destination node by way of one or more intermediate nodes.
To facilitate the flow of traffic from source endpoints to destination endpoints throughout the network, each of the nodes includes a reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexer (ROADM). As described in further detail below in the context of the various figures herein, a ROADM (which for convenience is also referred to interchangeably herein as a “node”) typically includes one or more bidirectional WDM ports coupled to other nodes of the network by way of one or more bidirectional WDM paths that carry WDMs signals each having multiple individual channels. Each of the bidirectional WDM ports of the ROADM is referred to herein as a degree and includes an ingress WDM port and a corresponding egress WDM port. The ROADM also includes one or more local add ports and/or local drop ports coupled to one or more local source systems and/or destination systems, respectively, from which traffic may originate and/or terminate.
The ROADM of a particular node facilitates the flow of traffic through that node of the network by receiving traffic either from a source system local to that node by way of a local add port, or from another node by way of an ingress WDM port, and, depending on the intended destination for the traffic, routing the traffic either to a destination system local to that node by way of a local drop port, or to another node by way of an egress WDM port. Traffic that a ROADM receives by way of its ingress WDM port from another node of the network and routes by way of its egress WDM port to another node of the network is referred to as “express traffic.”
Traffic that a ROADM either receives from a source system local to that node or routes to a destination system local to that node is referred to as “local traffic.” More particularly, traffic that a ROADM receives from a source system local to that node by way of a local add port, and routes by way of its egress WDM port to another node of the network is referred to as “local add traffic.” Traffic that a ROADM receives by way of an ingress WDM port from another node of the network, and routes by way of a local drop port to a destination system local to the node is referred to as “local drop traffic.”
Carriers are beginning to build all-coherent networks to fulfill rising 100 Gb/s service demands and expand network capacity. Although 100 Gb/s is the initial target data rate, some operators desire that new networks also support future 400 Gb/s data rates. In order to support faster data rates and/or provide additional functionality, modifications to ROADM/node architectures may be needed.
Each ROADM includes multiple components (e.g., a line subsystem, an add/drop subsystem, and local transponders), which are coupled to one another by way of intranodal optical fiber paths. Each of the ROADM components may be implemented according to one of several different architectures, and therefore any particular ROADM can be implemented according to one of numerous possible configurations. New node architectures should be flexible enough to support additional functionality and/or future transmission formats and as they become available. For instance, fixed filtering using a wavelength selective switch (WSSs) and a fixed add/drop structure (e.g., a fixed filtered AWG) may not fulfill the needs of 400 Gb/s service, which may require variability in bandwidth. In such a case, flexible grid wavelength selective switches (WSS) and add/drop elements with programmable center frequencies and bandwidths (i.e. colorless add/drop elements) may be desirable to provide colorless functionality. In some cases, in addition to colorless functionality, further architectural enhancements may be desired, such as colorless and directionless (CD) functionality employing a route-and-select WSS and a directionless add/drop element, and/or colorless, directionless, and contentionless (CDC) functionality employing a contentionless add/drop element as well.
Additionally, node modifications may also be needed to configure the node to accommodate an increased number of degrees and/or an increased number of add/drop modules, depending on the particular application. Thus, node configurations may vary from node to node and may change over time as needs evolve.
Management of the numerous intranodal optical fiber paths to be established between ROADM components (e.g., between the line subsystem and the add/drop subsystem) can be complex and burdensome, and the complexity and burden are only compounded by the needs for node architecture modification and flexibility described above. Installation and maintenance of the intranodal fiber paths can be operationally difficult and prone to error.
In some cases, fiber ribbon cables (each of which includes multiple, e.g., 12, fibers) may be employed to reduce the number of cables employed for establishing intranodal fiber paths. Such ribbon cables typically are terminated by a single multiple-fiber push-on/pull-off (MPO) connector at each end that contains all 12 terminating fibers. However, as shown in
Existing limitations associated with the foregoing, as well as other limitations, can be overcome by intranodal reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexer (ROADM) fiber management apparatuses (also referred to herein as a “fiber shuffles” and/or as “fiber interconnection apparatuses”) and systems and methods that employ such apparatuses to simplify the management of intranodal ROADM fiber paths.
In one example embodiment herein, the apparatus includes a plurality of ingress optical ports, a plurality of egress optical ports, and a plurality of optical interconnections interposed between ones of the plurality of ingress optical ports and ones of the plurality of egress optical ports. Each of the plurality of ingress optical ports corresponds to one of the plurality of egress optical ports. Each one of the plurality of ingress optical ports is optically coupled by way of the optical interconnections to at least one of the plurality of egress optical ports. Each one of the plurality of egress optical ports is optically coupled by way of the optical interconnections to at least one of the plurality of ingress optical ports.
In one example, for each one of the plurality of ingress optical ports, the one of the plurality of ingress optical ports is optically coupled by way of the optical interconnections to each one of the plurality of egress optical ports, excluding one of the plurality of egress optical ports that corresponds to the one of the plurality of ingress optical ports.
According to another example embodiment, the apparatus is housed in a single rack mountable enclosure, the enclosure including a plurality of ingress optical connectors by which respective ones of the plurality of ingress optical ports are accessible, and a plurality of egress optical connectors by which respective ones of the plurality of egress optical ports are accessible.
Also in one example embodiment herein, the plurality of optical interconnections is comprised of a plurality of topology modules including at least one of a mesh topology module and a star topology module.
In a further example embodiment herein, a contiguous group of ones of the plurality of ingress optical connectors is coupled, by way of the mesh topology module, to ones of the plurality of egress optical connectors that are adjacently arranged in the enclosure. In addition, at least one of the plurality of ingress optical connectors and a corresponding at least one of the plurality of egress optical connectors are terminated at a common termination, in one example.
In one example, a group of ones of the plurality of ingress optical connectors is coupled, by way of the star topology module, to a group of ones of the plurality of egress optical connectors, and at least one pair of corresponding ones of the optical ingress connectors and the optical egress connectors that is not included in the star topology module is interposed in the enclosure between the group of ones of the plurality of ingress optical connectors and the group of ones of the plurality of egress optical connectors.
According to another example embodiment, the enclosure includes one or more vacant slots that can accommodate one or more additional topology modules.
Also in one example embodiment herein, individual ones of the plurality of ingress optical connectors correspond to respective ones of the plurality of egress optical connectors.
In a further example embodiment herein, the plurality of optical interconnections is comprised of a plurality of topology modules including at least one of a mesh topology module and a star topology module. Each of the plurality of topology modules is coupled to at least one of (1) a contiguous group of adjacent ones of the plurality of ingress optical connectors and (2) a contiguous group of adjacent ones of the plurality of egress optical connectors.
In one example, each of the plurality of ingress optical ports includes a plurality of ingress optical fibers, and each of the plurality of egress optical ports includes a plurality of egress optical fibers.
According to another example embodiment, a total number of the plurality of optical ingress ports included in the apparatus is equal to a total number of the plurality of optical egress ports included in the apparatus.
In another example embodiment herein, an intranodal ROADM fiber management system is provided. The system includes a line subsystem including a plurality of line degree modules, an add/drop subsystem including a plurality of add/drop modules, a plurality of local transponders, and a fiber management apparatus. One or more of the plurality of line degree modules is communicatively coupled to one or more of the local transponders by way of the fiber management apparatus and one or more of the add/drop subsystems.
In a further example embodiment herein, the fiber management apparatus included in the system comprises a plurality of ingress optical ports, a plurality of egress optical ports, and a plurality of optical interconnections interposed between ones of the plurality of ingress optical ports and ones of the plurality of egress optical ports. Each of the plurality of ingress optical ports corresponds to one of the plurality of egress optical ports. Each one of the plurality of ingress optical ports is optically coupled by way of the optical interconnections to at least one of the plurality of egress optical ports. Each one of the plurality of egress optical ports is optically coupled by way of the optical interconnections to at least one of the plurality of ingress optical ports.
In one example, the plurality of line degree modules include at least one of (1) a broadcast and select line degree module that includes a splitter and a select wavelength selective switch (WSS) and (2) a route and select line degree module that includes a route WSS and a select WSS.
According to another example embodiment, the plurality of add/drop modules includes at least one of (1) a colorless, directionless, and contentionless (CDC) add/drop module having an erbium doped fiber amplifier and a multicast switch and (2) a low port count (LPC) CDC add/drop module.
Also in one example embodiment herein, the system further includes at least one expansion fiber management apparatus, and one or more of the plurality of line degree modules is communicatively coupled to one or more of the local transponders by way of the fiber management apparatus, the expansion fiber management apparatus, and one or more of the add/drop subsystems.
In a further example embodiment herein, the expansion fiber management apparatus includes a plurality of expansion line degree modules. The a plurality of expansion line degree modules include at least one of (1) a broadcast and select expansion line degree module that includes a splitter and a select wavelength selective switch (WSS) and (2) a route and select expansion line degree module that includes a route WSS and a select WSS.
In one example, the fiber management apparatus is housed in a first rack mountable enclosure, and the expansion fiber management apparatus is housed in a second rack mountable enclosure.
According to another example embodiment, at least two of (1) one or more of the plurality of line degree modules, (2) one or more of the plurality of add/drop modules, (3) one or more of the plurality of local transponders, and (4) the fiber management apparatus are optical coupled to one another by way of one or more optical ribbon cables.
Also in one example embodiment herein, the system is coupled to an optical network by way of at least one wavelength division multiplexed path.
The teachings claimed and/or described herein are further described in terms of exemplary embodiments. These exemplary embodiments are described in detail with reference to the drawings. These embodiments are non-limiting exemplary embodiments, wherein:
Presented herein are novel and inventive intranodal reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexer (ROADM) fiber management apparatuses (sometimes referred to herein as fiber shuffles), and systems and methods employing the apparatuses. In accordance with some aspects described herein, as described below in further detail, the apparatuses, methods, and systems employ a modularized fiber shuffle, in some cases together with fiber ribbon cables, to greatly simplify the management of intranodal (i.e., intra-ROADM) paths for express and local add/drop channels in an optical network. In some example embodiments, to aid in the installation, test, and identification of intranodal interconnections, optical test channels can be routed between modules (e.g., line degree modules, CDC add/drop modules, expansion modules, local transponders, etc.) in parallel with the add, drop, and/or express channels using a separate WDM channel. The test channels can be used between the modules to verify proper intranodal fiber setup, failure analysis, and to discover the port interconnections between the modules within the node.
Additionally, in accordance with various example aspects described herein, fiber shuffles are provided that are flexible enough to manage a range of numbers of ROADMs and types of ROADM modules (e.g., line degree modules, CDC add/drop modules, local transponders, expansion modules, etc.). The fiber shuffle includes a plurality of ports, each of which can be used for various types of modules of a ROADM.
In the example of
As shown in
The line degree subsystem 102 includes multiple (e.g., N) WDM line degree OADM modules 104, one per each degree of the ROADM 100. In the example of
In the example of
Each of the local transponders 108 includes a receiver portion that is coupled to a corresponding local destination system (not shown in
Broadcast-and-select line subsystem architectures, such as that shown in
A second drawback with the broadcast-and-select line architecture is the port isolation in the select WSS (e.g., 128). Each WSS 128 receives input channels broadcasted by splitters 122 from multiple ingress degrees and input channels provided by multiple local transponders 108. The WSS 128 selects single wavelengths for transmission, but signals from unselected wavelengths (e.g., from other degrees) may not be perfectly blocked. This may not be problematic for applications with low degree counts and tolerant transmission formats, but it may limit QAM in high port count scenarios. Thus, in some cases a different architecture can be employed as the line degree subsystem 102, such as a route-and-select architecture described below.
Having described the components of the ROADM 100 and how those components are interconnected, a description of how the components of the ROADM 100 function will now be provided. As mentioned above, each individual optical channel signal (e.g., λ1, also referred to interchangeably herein as “traffic”, a “wavelength”, and/or a “channel”) that is communicated across the multiple-node WDM network originates at a first endpoint (a source system) that is local to one of the ROADMs and terminates at a second endpoint (a destination system) that is local to another one of the ROADMs. The signal (e.g., λ1) can be communicated from a source system local to a source ROADM to a destination system local to a destination ROADM without traversing any intermediate ROADMs. The signal can also be communicated from a source system local to a source ROADM to a destination system local to a destination ROADM by way of one or more intermediate ROADMs. In general, the ROADM 100 functions by facilitating the flow of signals through that particular node, for example, by multiplexing and/or routing signals so that they reach the intended destination systems, which may be local to the ROADM 100 or may instead be local to a distant ROADM of the network.
Traffic that the ROADM 100 receives from another ROADM of the network, and routes (referred to as pass-through switching) to yet another ROADM of the network, is referred to as “express traffic.” Traffic that the ROADM 100 receives from a source system local to the ROADM 100, and routes to another ROADM of the network is referred to as “local add traffic.” Traffic that the ROADM 100 receives from another ROADM of the network, and routes to a destination system local to the ROADM 100 is referred to as “local drop traffic.”
Thus, for a given individual wavelength or channel signal (e.g., λ1), the ROADM 100 may be (1) local to a source system from which the signal originates, (2) local to a destination system to which the signal is to be communicated, or (3) an intermediate ROADM, local neither to the source nor the destination system of the signal, that forwards the signal along its path to the destination system which is local to another ROADM of the network. Under each of these three scenarios, the individual wavelength or channel signal (e.g., λ1) traverses a different path through the components of the ROADM 100, as described in further detail below.
In a case where the individual wavelength signal (e.g., λ1) is a local drop signal to be communicated to a destination system local to the ROADM 100, the following is an example path through which the signal can traverse. The signal (e.g., λ1) is one wavelength of a multiple-wavelength (e.g., λ1 to λn) WDM signal that is received at the input port 116 of the input amplifier 120, from the output port 126 of another ROADM (not shown in
In a case where the individual wavelength signal (e.g., λ1) is a local add signal that is to be communicated from a source system local to the ROADM 100 to a destination system that is local to another distant ROADM (not shown in
In a case where the ROADM 100 is not local to the source system or the destination system of the signal, but instead is intermediate to the source or the destination system of the signal (which is an express signal), the following is an example path through which the signal can traverse. The signal (e.g., λ1) is one wavelength of a multiple-wavelength (e.g., λ1 to λn) WDM signal that is received at the input port 116 of the input amplifier 120, from the output port 126 of another ROADM (not shown in
Having described the components and functionality of the example ROADM 100, reference will now be made to
However, one difference between the ROADM 100 and the ROADM 200 is that, whereas the ROADM 100 employs an AWG architecture add/drop subsystem 110, the ROADM 200 employs a two-tiered colorless and directionless (CD) add/drop subsystem 206. Since the two-tiered colorless and directionless add/drop subsystem 206 functions in a known manner to route signals between the local add/drop transponders 208 and the line degree subsystem 202, a complete description of its functionality is not provided herein. In general, the add/drop subsystem 206 aggregates add channels from the local transponders 208 and presents the aggregated add channels to the line subsystem 202 for transmission to a destination in the network. The add/drop subsystem 206 also routes drop channels from the line subsystem 202 to receivers in the local transponders 208.
The add/drop subsystem 206 includes a directionless switch module 218 and a colorless fan-out module 220. Although the add/drop subsystem 206 is shown in
The example architectures of add/drop subsystems described herein (e.g., CD and CDC), are provided for illustrative purposes only. Additional add/drop subsystem architectures, such as architectures based on M×N WSS for directionless switching and multiplexing, may be employed in lieu of the example architectures described herein. Additionally, although CD functionality has been described in the context of a broadcast-and-select line subsystem architectures, and CDC functionality has been described in the context of a route-and-select line subsystem architectures, either type of line subsystem architectures can be employed together with any of a number of types of add/drop subsystem architectures. Although various example embodiments herein are described in the context of a route-and-select line degree subsystem and a LPC CDC MCS-based add/drop subsystem, this is for illustrative purposes only and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention. Additionally, other combinations of architectures and port sizes are contemplated and are within the scope of the various example embodiments described herein.
Having described the example ROADMs 100 and 200, reference will now be made to
One difference between the ROADM 100 and the ROADM 300 is that, whereas the line degree modules 104 of the ROADM 100 include a broadcast splitter 122 that broadcasts the WDM signal received from the network to the local add/drop subsystem 110 and to a line degree module 104 of each other degree of the ROADM 100, the example ROADM 300 instead employs a route WSS 302 that provides the WDM signal received from the network only to either the local add/drop module 306 or to a line degree module 104 of a select one of the other degrees of the ROADM 300. This type of line degree subsystem architecture is referred to as a route-and-select architecture, because of the routing and selecting functions performed by a route WSS 302 and a select WSS 304, respectively. Employing a route-and-select architecture can mitigate the loss and isolation challenges described above by using the route WSS 302 to steer each ingress wavelength only to the desired destination (e.g., an egress degree or a local transponder). Eliminating unused wavelengths at a select WSS 304 removes the leakage of extraneous channels because interfering wavelengths are simply not present at the select WSS 304. In terms of loss, the route-and-select ROADM 300 has a fixed loss (typically 12-16 dB) from a pair of WSSs (i.e., the route WSS 302 and the select WSS 304) regardless of the number of degrees. In this way, a high degree count route-and-select WSS can be employed to serve many flexible add/drop structures with no deleterious reduction in node OSNR.
Which particular add/drop subsystem architecture is employed in a ROADM may depend, at least in part, on desired functionality. For instance, variable bandwidth channels may necessitate colorless add/drop functionality. Along with colorless add/drop functionality, colorless and directionless (CD) add/drop functionalities may be desired to improve the usability of high cost transponders. Additionally, colorless, directionless, and contentionless (CDC) add/drop structures have non-blocking benefits. Each type of functionality may be a factor in determining which add/drop subsystem architecture to employ.
Another difference between the ROADM 100 and the ROADM 300 is that, whereas the ROADM 100 employs an AWG architecture add/drop subsystem 110, the add/drop subsystem employed in the ROADM 200 is a non-blocking colorless, directionless, and contentionless (CDC) module 306. Since the CDC add/drop module 306 functions in a known manner to route signals between the local add/drop transponders 310 and the line degree subsystem 308, a complete description of its functionality is not provided herein.
For convenience, only a pair of route-and-select line degree modules 308 is shown in
A CDC add/drop module such as the module 306, which includes the 16×8 MCS 314 and the EDFA array 316, may be expensive and may suffer from degraded performance due to its high loss. A low port count (LPC) CDC add/drop module based on an 8×6 MCS can support 8 line degree modules and 6 local transponders but has low loss which may eliminate the need for an EDFA array, which, in turn, may reduce the cost of the CDC add/drop module and boost its optical performance. One drawback, however, associated with an architecture employing a LPC CDC add/drop module is the lower number of adds/drops that can be supported on the LPC CDC module (e.g., 6 instead of 16).
As can be appreciated in view of the above descriptions of the ROADMS 100, 200, and 300 of
To illustrate an example of such interconnections, reference will now be made to
In one example embodiment, the input and output ports of the line degree modules 402, the add/drop modules 404, and the local transponders 406 of the ROADM 400 of
Additionally, since each LPC CDC add/drop module 404 supports fewer local transponders 406 (6 local transponders, in this example), and since it may be desirable that at least one port of each line degree module 402 be coupled (e.g., via an optical fiber) to a port of each CDC add/drop module 404, there may be a need to expand ports on the line degree modules 402 so that the total number of local transponders 406 (e.g., 36 local transponders (6 per CDC add/drop module 404), in this example) can be supported overall. Thus, shown in
Each fiber path (e.g., each of the intranodal fiber connections 410) is shown in
Using fiber ribbon cables (each of which includes multiple, e.g., 12, fibers) to establish intranodal fiber paths can reduce the number of cables. Such ribbon cables typically are terminated by a single multiple-fiber push-on/pull-off (MPO) connector at each end that contains all 12 terminating fibers. In some cases, each MPO connector (or any other connector and/or termination described herein) includes at least one ingress fiber and at least one egress fiber, thus providing bidirectional (or symmetrical) connectivity between endpoints. However, as shown in
Described herein are various example embodiments that provide an apparatus for managing intranodal fiber paths that optically couple ROADM components (e.g., line degree modules, expansion modules, and/or CDC modules). In one example embodiment, the apparatus includes an additional piece of equipment (sometimes referred to herein as a “fiber shuffle”) that replaces the intranodal fiber paths 112, 204, 312, and/or 410 described above in the contexts of
One feature of a ROADM node is that it can be configured to handle a variable number of degrees and a variable number of add/drop modules so that it can be sized for a particular application, which may be different for each node of a network and may change over time. For instance, at one particular node 4 line degrees modules and 6 CDC add/drop modules may be needed, whereas another node may require 6 line degree modules and 4 CDC add/drop modules. Also, a node may initially be configured with 2 line degree modules and 2 CDC add/drop modules, and in the future may be expanded to include an increased number of line degree modules and/or CDC add/drop modules. Thus, the various example embodiments herein provide a fiber shuffle that is sufficiently flexible to support a range of module numbers and types, and that includes ports that can be used for various module types. In this way, the fiber shuffle can facilitate different interconnect patterns between line degree modules, expansion line degree modules, and/or CDC add/drop modules (see, e.g., the various interconnect patterns between the components of
Having described an example fiber shuffle in general terms, reference will now be made to
In the example shuffle 500, each port (e.g., ingress ports 1 through 10, egress ports 1 through 10) includes a plurality (e.g., 9) of fibers. By way of a hardwired topology internal to the shuffle 500, the ports of the shuffle 500 are mutually meshed in that each port (e.g., port 1) is coupled to each other port (e.g., ports 2 through 10) by way of respective ones of the 9 fibers of the respective ports. For example, the 9 fibers of ingress port 1 are coupled to respective fibers of egress ports 2 through 10. For example, the 9 fibers of egress port 1 are coupled to respective fibers of ingress ports 2 through 10. In this way, by way of the internal topology of the shuffle 500, a signal that is received at any one of the ingress ports 502 can be outputted by way of any one of the nine other egress ports 504.
As described above, in one example embodiment, the shuffle 500 can replace the intranodal fiber paths 112, 204, 312, and/or 410 described above in the contexts of
For instance, as will be described in further detail below, in one example embodiment the bidirectional shuffle ports 502, 504 can be cabled (external to the shuffle 500) to a single module in the system, be it a line degree module or CDC add/drop module (neither of which is shown in
Additionally, as described in further detail below in connection with
Having described an example shuffle 500, reference will now be made to
Having described an example front patent of the shuffle 600, reference will now be made to
Having described how components of a ROADM may be interconnected to the shuffle 702, reference will now be made to
Note that the route WSS 802 (e.g., which may be the route WSS 302 described above in the context of
The CDC add/drop modules 1 through 6 shown in
Although
Having described example manners by which a fiber shuffle may couple ROADM components (e.g., line degree modules, add/drop modules, local transponders, etc.), reference will now be made to
As mentioned above in the context of
Referring now to
In some example embodiments, the main shuffle 1002 can be any one of the shuffles 600 or 702 described above in the context of
The main shuffle 1002 and expansion shuffle 1004 are coupled to one another in this example by way of a 12-fiber MPO cable 1012 interposed between port 9 of the main shuffle 1004 and a main port 1022 of the expansion shuffle 1004. The expansion modules 1006 are coupled to corresponding fiber jumper ports 1017 of the expansion shuffle 1004 by way of MPO cables 1015 in a manner similar to that by which the line degree modules 1010 are connected to the ports (Degree 1 through Degree 8) of the main shuffle 1002. One exception, however, is that while in the case of the line degree modules 1010 the line input and output fiber paths 1018 on the line 1010 degree modules are connected to an interoffice fiber plant (not shown in
As can be appreciated in view of the above description of
Having described an example system 1000 employing an expansion shuffle 1004, reference will now be made to
Although various example embodiments described herein include 9-port route-and-select degree modules (e.g., 308, 402, 408, 704, 904, 1006, 1010), this is by example only and should not be construed as limiting. Other example embodiments are contemplated that can be directly scaled to manage fiber paths in line degree modules having a higher port count. For example, 16-port (e.g., 16-fiber) line degree modules can be accommodated in a 17-port main shuffle with 16-fiber MPO cables per port, and the internal fiber topologies 1104 (in the main shuffle 1002) and 1106 (in the expansion shuffle 1004) shown in
In the various example embodiments described thus far herein, ROADM components are meshed in that each line degree module of the ROADM is coupled by way of fibers to every other line degree module of the ROADM and to every other local transponder of the ROADM. In some example embodiments, however, there may be no need to couple every one of the CDC add/drop modules (or every one of the local transponders) to every one of the 12 line degree modules of the ROADM. In such a case, certain local transponder channels may be limited to being routed to a subset of the line degree modules in the ROADM, but this limitation may be acceptable from a network routing perspective. In such an example embodiment, LPC CDC add/drop module (e.g., an 8×6 CDC add/drop module) may be employed even in ROADM systems having a number of degrees that is larger than the maximum number that the LPC CDC add/drop module can accommodate fully (e.g., greater than 8 degree in this example).
As mentioned above, various example topologies internal to fiber shuffles are possible, and which specific topology is used can depend on multiple factors, such as the specific needs of a particular node, which may evolve over time and warrant reconfiguration of shuffle topologies and/or other ROADM components. To simplify the configuration and reconfiguration of shuffle internal topologies, such topologies can be assembled, in accordance with various example embodiments herein, based on one or more subtopologies (e.g., mesh topologies and/or star topologies), as described in further detail below in connection with
In accordance with some of the example embodiments herein, industry-standard MPO multi-fiber terminations, which are available in specific numbers of fibers, are employed in a shuffle to couple line degree modules to CDC add/drop modules. Each MPO multi-fiber termination, in one example, includes at least one ingress fiber and at least one egress fiber, thus providing bidirectional (or symmetrical) connectivity between endpoints. Using the shuffle 500 shown in
As can be seen from
Although the mesh topology 1308 shown in
To further illustrate the four-way mesh topology 1308 provided for port 1 through port 4 of the shuffle 1300,
Having described an example mesh subtopology, reference will now be made to
Having described an example mesh topology that can be employed in a fiber shuffle, reference will now be made to
To further illustrate a 6-way star topology (e.g., topology 1602 described above) that may be included in a fiber shuffle,
As can be seen from
Together
As can be appreciated in view of the above description of
Having described various example embodiments for shuffle topology modularization (e.g., by way of mesh subtopologies and/or star subtopologies), reference will now be made to
By virtue of the independence between each of the mesh topologies and/or star topologies that can be combined in a fiber shuffle, the topologies employed in a fiber shuffle can be physical arranged in the shuffle so as to fit available rack space more readily. For example,
Having described an example front panel arrangement of a shuffle 2000, reference will now be made to
In particular, in the example front panel arrangement of the shuffle 2000, the fibers of the mesh subtopology 1502 are mapped to fibers 1 through 3 (i.e., termination 1) of ports 1 through 4; the fibers of the mesh subtopology 1504 are mapped to fibers 4 through 6 (i.e., termination 2) of ports 4 through 7; the fibers of the mesh subtopology 1506 are mapped to fibers 7 through 9 (i.e., termination 3) of ports 7 through 10; the fibers of the star subtopology 1802 are mapped to fibers 7 through 9 (i.e., termination 3) of ports 1 through 3 and to fibers 1 through 3 (i.e., termination 1) of ports 8 through 10; the fibers of the star subtopology 1804 are mapped to fibers 4 through 6 (i.e., termination 2) of ports 1 through 3 and to fibers 1 through 3 (i.e., termination 1) of ports 5 through 7; and the fibers of the star subtopology 1806 are mapped to fibers 7 through 9 (i.e., termination 3) of ports 4 through 6 and to fibers 4 through 6 (i.e., termination 2) of ports 8 through 10.
In particular, in the example front panel arrangement of the shuffle 2000, shown in
Having described example front panel arrangements of fiber shuffles, reference will now be made to
The 10-port shuffle 2502 can be dynamically grown as the number of ROADM degrees or CDC add/drop modules are increased.
Having described example arrangements and mappings of a front panel of a shuffle of a ROADM, reference will now be made to
In one example embodiment, a fiber shuffle (e.g., such as the shuffle 2700) can be constructed in the following manner. Given R rows of connectors (e.g., MPO connectors), where each connector supports N fiber ingress/egress pairs (i.e., 2×N fibers total per connector), the number of columns is computed according to Equation 1 shown below.
R×(N+1) (Equation 1)
The mesh size is (N+1) connectors, and the star size is (2×N) connectors. R mesh topologies and (R−1)! star topologies can be utilized to fully populate an R-row fiber shuffle. The number of degrees supported by the mesh is N degrees when CDC add/drop modules that support N degrees are coupled to the shuffle.
Illustrated in
In a second configuration (labeled configuration 2 in
In a third configuration (labeled configuration 3 in
Reference will now be made to
As can be appreciated in view of the above, the example aspects herein provide an intranodal reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexer (ROADM) fiber management apparatus, and a system employing the apparatus. In accordance with some aspects described herein, the system employs a fiber shuffle and fiber ribbon cables that greatly simplify the management of intranodal (i.e., intra-ROADM) paths for express and local add/drop channels in an optical network. In some example embodiments, to aid in the installation, test, and identification of intranodal interconnections, optical test channels can be routed between modules (e.g., line degree modules, CDC add/drop modules, expansion modules, local transponders, etc.) in parallel with the add, drop, and/or express channels using a separate WDM channel. The test channels can be used between the modules to verify proper intranodal fiber setup, failure analysis, and to discover the port interconnections between the modules within the node.
Additionally, in accordance with various example aspects described herein, a fiber shuffle is provided that is flexible enough to manage a range of numbers and types of modules of a ROADM (e.g., line degree modules, CDC add/drop modules, local transponders, expansion modules, etc.). The fiber shuffle includes a plurality of ports, each of which can be used for various types of modules of a ROADM.
In addition, in some example embodiments herein, a fiber shuffle is provided wherein one or more mesh topologies and/or one or more star topologies are located in a shelf (or rack-mountable chassis) that also includes one or more line degree modules and/or one or more add/drop modules (e.g., CDC add/drop modules). In this way, cabling external to the shelf may not be required between the one or more mesh topologies, the one or more star topologies, the one or more line degree modules, and/or the one or more add/drop modules.
It should be noted that the network configurations represented in the figures described herein are merely provided for illustrative purposes, and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention. Also, in other embodiments, the networks may have other configurations than those shown in the figures.
Additionally, while specific implementations of the invention may have been described, the invention need not be so limited. For example, various embodiments of the invention may comprise different number of ports other than those described in this disclosure.
In the foregoing description, example aspects of the invention are described with reference to specific example embodiments thereof. The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative rather than in a restrictive sense. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto, in a computer program product or software, hardware, or any combination thereof, without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the present invention.
Software embodiments of example aspects described herein may be provided as a computer program product, or software, that may include an article of manufacture on a machine-accessible, computer-readable, and/or machine-readable medium (memory) having instructions. The instructions on the machine-accessible, computer-readable and/or machine-readable medium may be used to program a computer system or other electronic device. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks or other types of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing or transmitting electronic instructions. The techniques described herein are not limited to any particular software configuration. They may find applicability in any computing or processing environment. The terms “machine-accessible medium”, “computer-readable medium”, “machine-readable medium”, or “memory” used herein shall include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or transmitting a sequence of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one of the procedures described herein. Furthermore, it is common in the art to speak of software, in one form or another (e.g., program, procedure, process, application, module, unit, logic, and so on) as taking an action or causing a result. Such expressions are merely a shorthand way of stating that the execution of the software by a processing system causes the processor to perform an action to produce a result. In other embodiments, functions performed by software can instead be performed by hardcoded modules, and thus the invention is not limited only for use with stored software programs. Indeed, the numbered parts of the above-identified procedures represented in the drawings may be representative of operations performed by one or more respective modules, wherein each module may include software, hardware, or a combination thereof.
In addition, it should be understood that the figures illustrated in the attachments, which highlight the functionality and advantages of the present invention, are presented for example purposes only. The architecture of the example aspect of the present invention is sufficiently flexible and configurable, such that it may be utilized (and navigated) in ways other than that shown in the accompanying figures.
Although example aspects herein have been described in certain specific example embodiments, many additional modifications and variations would be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore to be understood that the various example embodiments herein may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. Thus, the present example embodiments, again, should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/788,365, filed Oct. 19, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/467,578 filed on Aug. 25, 2014, which application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/869,905, filed on Aug. 26, 2013, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4903338 | Funke | Feb 1990 | A |
5166886 | Molnar et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5317439 | Fatehi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5355238 | Kight et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5394503 | Dietz, Jr. et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5412464 | Thomas et al. | May 1995 | A |
5438528 | Emerson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5500756 | Tsushima et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5515361 | Li et al. | May 1996 | A |
5530862 | Wadsworth et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5568612 | Barrett et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5611046 | Russell et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613160 | Kraslavsky et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5647056 | Barrett et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5793909 | Leone et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5864414 | Barnsley et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5940197 | Ryu | Aug 1999 | A |
5940591 | Boyle et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6025941 | Srivastava et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044367 | Wolff | Mar 2000 | A |
6058482 | Liu | May 2000 | A |
6067545 | Wolff | May 2000 | A |
6081359 | Takehana et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6101508 | Wolff | Aug 2000 | A |
6111672 | Davis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6178025 | Hardcastle et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185601 | Wolff | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6230218 | Casper et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249510 | Thompson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6304347 | Beine et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307986 | Duerksen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317231 | Al-Salameh et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333931 | LaPier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6400476 | Arecco | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433900 | Kuroyanagi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441933 | Jang | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466348 | Izumi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6504963 | Fang et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6525852 | Egnell | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529316 | Treyz et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535309 | Terahara | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549692 | Harel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559984 | Lee et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567194 | Badr | May 2003 | B1 |
6594046 | Nishino | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606427 | Graves et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6678828 | Pham et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6701085 | Müller | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6728484 | Ghani | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748416 | Carpenter et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6792269 | Boehmke | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6807636 | Hartman et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6822860 | Owens | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6868201 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6915075 | Oberg et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6925052 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931530 | Pham et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934248 | DeBoer et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6952529 | Mittal | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6965593 | Donahue et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6999677 | Graves et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7031778 | Hsiung et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7046619 | Alagar et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054519 | Novotny | May 2006 | B1 |
7072580 | Arecco | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7072584 | Lichtman et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7080157 | McCanne | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088893 | Cooke et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099578 | Gerstel | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7113481 | Elie-Dit-Cosaque et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7133616 | Caroli | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7134011 | Fung | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143288 | Pham et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7155124 | Peddanarappagari et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7181620 | Hur | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7184666 | Li et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7231107 | Zhong et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236704 | Cao | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7245829 | Sindile | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7272321 | Kuo et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7292786 | Barbarossa et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7308197 | Zhong et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7334124 | Pham et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343066 | Doerr et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7448079 | Tremain | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7558284 | Shinomiya et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7630634 | Boduch | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7653311 | Kikuchi et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7715715 | Gerstel et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7734730 | McCanne | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751714 | Zhong et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7781714 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7822967 | Fung | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826748 | Yang et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7983560 | Maki et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8036527 | Chang et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8089683 | Holmes | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8116629 | Boduch et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126330 | Wisseman | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8135280 | Zong et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8190027 | Boduch et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8316237 | Felsher et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8320759 | Boduch | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8346089 | Wisseman | Jan 2013 | B2 |
3428461 | Boduch et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
8412038 | Natori | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8447183 | Boduch | May 2013 | B2 |
8509618 | Boertjes et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8565603 | Boduch | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8600830 | Hoffberg | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8625994 | Archambault | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8705741 | Voruganti et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8731398 | Akiyama et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8737776 | Boduch | May 2014 | B2 |
8879915 | Sakamoto | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8891914 | Ticknor | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8977129 | Coroy | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8995832 | Ji et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9008514 | Boduch | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9071364 | Voois et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9252910 | Roorda | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9276695 | Boduch et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9276696 | Al Sayeed et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9374186 | Boduch et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9551836 | Frankel et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9661407 | Mitchell | May 2017 | B2 |
9723385 | Hu | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9819436 | Younce | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9831945 | Shang et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10009671 | Younce | Jun 2018 | B2 |
20010025377 | Hinderks | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010026384 | Sakano et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030797 | Kosaka et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020021862 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020044322 | Blumenthal et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020048066 | Antoniades et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049862 | Gladney et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020057477 | Rocca et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020080440 | Li et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020093707 | Katagiri et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097469 | Yee et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101636 | Xiao et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109879 | Wing | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120638 | Boehmke | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120765 | Boehmke | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020145779 | Strasser et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020186432 | Roorda et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002104 | Caroli et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030007209 | Liu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025956 | Li et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031452 | Simmons et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030095307 | Moon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030126200 | Wolff | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030138251 | Jayaram et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030156840 | Uchikata | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161629 | Frascolla et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030179741 | Goergen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040028407 | Noheji | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040033079 | Sheth et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042712 | Cho et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040076438 | Lee | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040042795 | Doerr et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161232 | Kerfoot, III | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175179 | Xiao et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179472 | Khalilzadeh et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184809 | Miyata et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190901 | Fang | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040247239 | Eldada | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258411 | Al-Salameh et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050047795 | Windover et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078461 | Dobbs et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050158047 | Way et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050213970 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050281558 | Wang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060034610 | Akiyama et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060098981 | Miura et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060133804 | Boduch et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133807 | Jenkins et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060177225 | Paraschis et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200660 | Woods | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215545 | Nelson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070025729 | Barnard | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070086332 | Way et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070104494 | Murayama | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126605 | Aleksic et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070237524 | Gerstel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070280684 | Onodo et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292129 | Yan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008474 | Boduch et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013953 | Boduch et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013954 | Boduch et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031627 | Smith et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040790 | Kuo | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080083013 | Soliman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080181605 | Palacharla et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080209505 | Ghai et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209521 | Malaney | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080253764 | Collings et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260386 | Boduch | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267631 | Collings et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090016713 | Liu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018453 | Banet et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090041457 | Maki et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067845 | Zhong et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080880 | Lee et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090148166 | Akiyama et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180779 | Boduch et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090226168 | Boduch | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090232492 | Blair et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090304384 | Li et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100034532 | Ghelfi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100074386 | Sakamoto et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100124391 | Feuer | May 2010 | A1 |
20100129082 | Zhong et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100142943 | Frankel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142961 | Wisseman | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100202778 | Wisseman | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100221004 | Haslam et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100272441 | Boduch et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110052201 | Ji et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110085803 | Ji et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110116789 | Wellbrock et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110206204 | Sychev | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110236013 | Gazzola et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110262142 | Archambault | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110262143 | Ji et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110286746 | Ji | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120027408 | Atlas et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120086203 | Agtuca | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120121250 | Xia et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120144066 | Medved et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120183294 | Boertjes et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120189259 | Manes | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120201541 | Patel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120301137 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120321306 | Wellbrock et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120328239 | Fuerst et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130022352 | Yamashita | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130045006 | Dahan et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130071104 | Nakashima et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130108215 | Ticknor et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130108267 | Wisseman | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121685 | Rao et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130195449 | Ghioni et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130259474 | Ji | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130315580 | Boertjes et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130336658 | Xia | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140308047 | Mak et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140376918 | Boduch | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150055952 | Younce et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150131991 | Hattori et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150135319 | Costantini et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150229411 | Takeda | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160173225 | Cavaliere et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191188 | Butler | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160301495 | Ji et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170230110 | Hurley et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180120520 | Kelly | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101222277 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101588219 | Nov 2009 | CN |
101909004 | Dec 2010 | CN |
101984566 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102130721 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102316007 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102868476 | Jan 2013 | CN |
207051538 | Feb 2018 | CN |
1202595 | May 2002 | EP |
1434374 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1628424 | Feb 2006 | EP |
5681394 | Mar 2015 | JP |
5767327 | Aug 2015 | JP |
9820724 | May 1998 | WO |
9953415 | Oct 1999 | WO |
03061330 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2008008277 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2011044371 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011133709 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Search Authority in PCT/JP2008/059672 dated Nov. 14, 2008. |
Lei Zang et al.; “A Novel Tunable DeMUX/MUX Solution for WSS-Based ROADM and WXC Nodes,” Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, OFCNFOEC 2007 25-29, Mar. 25-29, 2007, pp. 1-7. |
A. Jajszczyk et al.; “An Architecture for a Photonic Fast Packed Switching Fabric,” Proceedings of the Global Telecommunications Conference (Blobecom), New York, Dec. 2, 1991, pp. 1219-1223. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Search Authority in PCT/US2009/001387 dated Sep. 9, 2009. |
M.P. Earnshaw et al., “Planar Lightwave Circuit Based Reconfigurable Optical Add-Drop Multiplexer Architectures and Reusable Subsystem Module, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics”, vol. 11, No. 2, Mar./Apr. 2005, pp. 313-322. |
European Office Action dated May 3, 2011, in counterpart European Application No. 07 796 705.7-2415. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Search Authority in PCT/US2007/015541 dated Jun. 5, 2008. |
European Search Report dated Nov. 29, 2010 in European Application No. 07 796 705.7-2415. |
European Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2010 in European Application No. 07 796 705.7-2415. |
Christophe Chauvet, European Search Report in Application No. 07 796 705.7-2415, Mar. 5, 2011, p. 3-5. |
Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/788,365 (19 pages). |
Perrin, Sterling, White Paper: The Need for Next-Generation ROADM Networks, Sep. 2010 (Year: 2010). |
De Silva, Clarence W., Mechatronics: A Foundation Course, 2010, CRC Press, pp. 80-81. |
Europe Telecom East & West Newsletter, Nov. 2010, vol. 15, No. 11, p. 9. |
Gupta, Textbook on Optical Fiber Communication and Its Applications, 2012, PHI Learning Private Limited, p. 340. |
Hermans et al., Broadband Opto-Electrical Receivers in Standard CMOS, 2007, Springer, pp. 13-14. |
Infmera, How to Maximize Network Bandwidth Efficiency, 2010, Infinera Corporation, p. 3. |
Smartoptics, Transponders and Muxponders: WDM networking solutions, Dec. 2015, p. 3. |
Tricker, Ray, Optoelectronics and Fiber Optic Technology, 2002, Elsevier Science, pp. 132-133. |
Medhi, Von Neumann Architecture, 2012, www2.cs.siu.edu/˜cs401/Textbook/ch2.pff, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/788,365, Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2019, 23 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/664,470, Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2019, 33 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180337747 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61869905 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15788365 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 16034120 | US | |
Parent | 14467578 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 15788365 | US |