The invention relates to an intraocular implant, and in particular to an intraocular implant for use in cataract operations or refractive crystalline lens extraction operations. The invention also relates to a method for fixing such an intraocular implant into an eye.
The cataract condition is a well known eye ailment, which these days is easily treatable through surgery. The condition involves an opacification, yellowing or clouding of the natural crystalline lens (see
The surgical procedure involves the removal of the opaque lens and its substitution by an artificial lens having the required focusing effect.
One way of achieving this is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,925,825.
One way of extracting the opaque natural lens—a process known as extra-capsular extraction—will now be described. Reference is first made to US 2003/0130732,
To facilitate the removal of the opaque or cloudy lens, the lens is first emulsified by the phacoemulsification method or by a pulsed laser. Phacoemsulification involves making a small incision in the cornea and introducing a very thin needle through the incision, which is then brought into contact with the lens through the capsulotomy. The needle is caused to vibrate at an ultrasonic frequency by the use of a magnetostrictive driver. The ultrasonic vibrations of the needle soften the lens and emulsify it. The emulsified parts can then be aspirated out of the capsule through the incision. Finally, the incision is widened sufficiently to introduce the substitute artificial lens into the capsule. A pulsed laser can be used to create an opening in the capsule, by photoablating capsular tissue along a predetermined boundary, which can be circular or elliptical if desired.
Like the lens of
One problem associated with the known capsular insert technique is that it is difficult to centre the lens accurately in the X-Y plane of the eye. (The X-Y-Z co-ordinates are shown in
It is also difficult to ensure that the lens has the desired placement in the rotational direction in the X-Y plane. A third problem is that, due to the presence of the haptics, the known technique requires a fairly large incision in the eye in order to be able to introduce the implant into the eye, whereas it is always desirable to be able to minimize the degree of intervention, including the size of the incision.
A further drawback is the difficulty of accurately defining the location of the lens in the Z-direction. This can lead to difficulties in defining the required optical power of the lens.
It is an aim of the intraocular implant according to the present invention to mitigate drawbacks associated with the known implant techniques.
The present invention provides an intraocular implant for placement in the eye, the implant comprising a main portion, which is a lamina, and a peripheral portion peripheral to the main portion, the implant having at least two lugs extending from the peripheral portion in a direction substantially perpendicular to a plane of the lamina, the lugs being for engagement with corresponding voids provided in a capsule of the eye.
The peripheral portion may comprise at least two haptics extending from the main portion, the haptics comprising respective lugs extending from the haptics in said direction substantially perpendicular to the plane of the lamina.
The peripheral portion may comprise a short extension of the main portion over the entire periphery of the main portion, the extension of the main portion comprising the at least two lugs. This configuration is potentially more compact than the haptic-based configuration. According to one example embodiment, the lugs are substantially equidistantly spaced around the peripheral portion. This allows for greater stability of attachment of the implant to the capsule.
The at least two lugs may each comprise a neck portion, which extends from the peripheral portion in the direction substantially perpendicular to the plane of the lamina, and a head portion extending from the neck portion. The head portion may be mushroom-shaped or otherwise larger than the neck portion, which allows for easier and more secure attachment of the implant to the capsule.
The neck portion may have a length, in the direction substantially perpendicular to the plane of the lamina, approximately equal to the thickness of a wall of the capsule. This length may be in a range 30 to 50 micrometers for example. In addition, the neck portion may have a diameter in a range 100 to 500 micrometers for example.
The implant may take the form of a lens, in which case the main portion of the implant will comprise the optic of the lens. Alternatively, the implant may be a plug for occluding an opening in the capsule of the eye. The plug may have no optical power and may or may not be opaque.
The present invention also provides a method for fixing the intraocular implant into an eye, the method comprising: forming voids within the capsule of the eye, the number of voids corresponding to the number of lugs of the implant; orienting the implant proximate to the capsule, so that the lugs face toward respective voids, and inserting the lugs into the voids, thereby securing the implant to the capsule.
In this method, the at least two lugs may each comprise a neck portion, which extends from the peripheral portion in the direction substantially perpendicular to the plane of the lamina, and a head portion extending from the neck portion, and wherein the lugs are inserted, head portion first, into the voids, the head portion being such as to discourage the implant from coming away from the capsule.
Before the orienting step, there may be the step of surgically removing the natural crystalline lens material of the eye, and, when the capsule is evacuated of the natural crystalline lens material, fixing the implant onto the capsule from either inside or outside the capsule.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the drawings, in which:
The head 58 of the lugs is preferably, but not necessarily, mushroom-shaped (see
The profile of the lugs may be other than mushroom-shaped, provided it allows relatively easy insertion of the lugs into the voids in the capsule wall. Thus, the lug may have a “T”-shaped cross-section, as shown in
As regards the profile of the lugs in plan view (view orthogonal to the sectional view of
A second embodiment of the implant in accordance with the invention is illustrated in
Here the implant has no haptics, but consists of the optic 70 plus a peripheral section 72, which is a simple extension of the edge of the optic 70. The radial width of the extension will be at least sufficient to accommodate the lugs and to ensure that the voids made in the capsule are reasonably remote from the lip of the capsulotomy. Four lugs 74 protrude from, and are of one piece with, the peripheral section, being substantially equidistantly spaced around the peripheral section. The lugs 74 are configured as in the first embodiment (see
This implant is smaller than that of the first embodiment, since no haptics are present. This means that the incision to be made in the eye, in order to introduce the implant into the eye, can be made smaller, with a smaller wound and leading to a faster recovery of the patient and less induced astigmatism.
When the implant is located adjacent to the inside of a capsulotomy made in the anterior part of the capsule (an “anterior capsulotomy”)—this location is called the “bag fixated” location—the lugs will face toward the front of the eye. This situation applies to the first embodiment, since it assumes the use of haptics, and also to the second embodiment. In addition the lugs can be placed on the posterior side of the device and be fixated in the bag using posterior facing lugs and voids in the posterior capsule. There may or may not be a posterior capsulotomy separate from the voids to receive the lugs. In addition, where the implant of the second embodiment is located adjacent to the outside of the anterior capsulotomy (the “sulcus fixated” location), the lugs will be facing toward the back of the eye. The reverse will apply where the implant is located adjacent the inside or outside of a posterior capsulotomy.
Examples of the above-described first and second embodiments are shown in
A similar configuration, but involving a lens with haptics, is shown in
Finally, an example of a hapticless lens 140 having posterior-facing lugs 142 engaging posterior voids is shown in
The use of the lugs in these two embodiments has the following advantages:
Instead of using only one lens as an implant, it may be necessary to employ a multi-lens design. Examples of such a design are illustrated and discussed in US 2003/0130732 mentioned earlier, the contents of which are incorporated by reference. The multiple lens form a unit and are secured to the capsule via either anterior-facing or posterior-facing lugs. Alternatively, both anterior and posterior facing lugs may be provided on respective front and back lenses, these lugs engaging with voids made in the anterior and posterior walls of the lens capsule.
In another example embodiment of the invention, the implant is not a lens, but a plug, blank or bung. Such an implant is not required to have any refractive power, but serves merely to close a fenestration or other aperture in the capsule. An example of this is shown in
The plug may or may not be opaque, depending on the location of the aperture being closed.
A specific example of a plug in use with a capsule is not shown in the drawings. However, a typical scenario is as shown in
Fenestrations that might be closed off using the plug are, for example, fenestrations introduced into the capsule in order to facilitate the entry of an instrument for evacuating the lens material. In this respect, femtosecond lasers are often used to cut the lens into very small cubes or slices, so that they can be evacuated through a small-bore instrument or cannula. The cannula can be introduced into the capsule through such a fenestration. In addition, the plug can be used to provide tectonic support, in order to keep compartments in the eye physically separate. It is also useful as a means of preventing silicone oil from moving forward into the anterior segment of the eye. The plug may also be used to close or block a capsulotomy to inhibit vitreous prolapse.
Although a total of two lugs are shown in some embodiments and four in others, there may be as many lugs as there are haptics in the embodiment having haptics (there may also be fewer lugs than haptics), and fewer than, or more than, four lugs in the second. A criterion for selecting the number of lugs is to ensure a secure fixing of the implant to the capsule.
Also, it should be appreciated that the haptics shown in the example embodiment are representative only, and may take many other shapes.
The lugs, though shown as being unitary with the haptics or the lens extension, may instead be separate items, which are attached by suitable means to the haptics or extension in order to allow the lens optic to move or flex for accommodating lens designs. For flexible extensions a common material is silicone. The lugs may be constructed from silicone or acrylic material, as is common with current intraocular lens implants as well as other materials.
Similarly, while the implant, apart from the haptics, has been shown in the drawings as being essentially circular in shape, it may take any shape corresponding to the capsule opening against which it is to be located. Thus, where the implant is a lens, it may be oval or elliptical in shape, for example, instead of circular.
Although the use of the implant of the present invention has been described in connection with cataract surgery, alternative uses are envisaged. Thus, the implant can be also be employed in surgical procedures for treating myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism or presbyopia (refractive lens exchange surgery) or used in procedures where the natural lens is left in place and an implant lens is also inserted.
The foregoing description has been given by way of example only and it will be appreciated by a person skilled in the art that modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4206518 | Jardon | Jun 1980 | A |
4262370 | Harstein | Apr 1981 | A |
4485498 | Gimbel | Dec 1984 | A |
4642114 | Rosa | Feb 1987 | A |
5697973 | Peyman | Dec 1997 | A |
6051024 | Cumming | Apr 2000 | A |
6537316 | Chambers | Mar 2003 | B1 |
20050256570 | Azar | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050288697 | Tei et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060058812 | Terwee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060142856 | Willis et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070088433 | Esch | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080269883 | Das et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100036488 | de Juan, Jr. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100152847 | Padrick et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20120078363 | Lu | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
European Application No. 10251497.3-2320, European Search Report dated Feb. 2, 2011, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130331939 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |