Intraocular lens that matches an image surface to a retinal shape, and method of designing same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10758340
  • Patent Number
    10,758,340
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 3, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 1, 2020
    3 years ago
Abstract
An intraocular lens (IOL), system, and method having a base lens and a complementary lens selected to form a curved image surface matching a retina surface when placed in an eye's line of sight.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure relates to intraocular lenses (IOLs), and more particularly to IOLs designed to produce an image surface that matches the curved surface of the retina.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

When light from an object in the field of view of a human subject's eye enters the eye through the pupil, the light is focused by refraction through the optical system of the eye onto the retina, forming an image of the object on the retina. Photoreceptor cells in the retina react to the light and send signals through the optic nerve to the brain, where the signals are perceived as the object in the visual field. The photoreceptor cells are not uniformly distributed on the retina, and the resolution of the perceived object is determined in part by the density of the photoreceptors at the location on the retina where the image of that object is formed. The resolution of the perceived object is also determined in part by how correctly the image is focused on the retina by the eye's optical system. The eye's refracting optical elements include the cornea and the lens. If those elements are not able to focus on the retina, the image formed will be distorted and the subject's vision will not be optimal.


The photoreceptor cells in the retina that detect light are called rods and cones. The cone cells, named for their conical shape, function best in relatively bright light and are responsible for detecting color. The cones are most densely packed near a point on the retina called the fovea, and become less dense moving away from the fovea. The fovea is a small pit-like structure disposed near the central axis of the optics of the eye. Thus, the cones are responsible for high resolution vision of well-lit objects in the center of the visual field. In contrast, the rod cells, named for their cylindrical shape, function well in dim light and are most densely concentrated at the periphery of the retina, becoming less dense moving toward the fovea. The rods thus provide for peripheral vision and night vision.


In a healthy eye, light from the center of the field of view enters the pupil and is sharply focused near the fovea, whereas light from the periphery of the field of view is focused at corresponding points on the periphery of the retina. However, any of a plurality of disorders can cause the optics of the eye to focus light improperly on the retina, causing the subject's vision to be blurred.


To resolve some disorders, such as clouding that develops in the eye lens (called a “cataract”), the natural lens may be surgically removed, and an intraocular lens (IOL) surgically implanted in the eye, typically placed at the former location of the natural lens of the eye.


IOLs are designed to work in conjunction with the optical elements of the eye (e.g., the cornea) to produce a sharp image only at the on-axis focal point on the retina and the paraxial region centered thereon. In general, no consideration is given to the off-axis optical properties of the retina or the optical system. Accordingly, even when a subject's vision is corrected at the center of the visual field, the peripheral image in general remains out of focus, resulting in a retinal image that is not optimal. As such, the subject's corrected vision is not as good as it could be, and peripheral vision and night vision are generally much worse than optimal.


Moreover, prior art IOLs do not correct any form of central vision loss, because the only portion of the retinal image that is in focus is located at the point where central vision occurs, i.e., where the central axis of the optics of the eye intersects the retina. In addition, some disorders involve changes in the retinal surface topography, such as substance buildup in the outer retina. Because prior art IOLs only focus light near the fovea, they do not correct for such changes in the diseased peripheral retinal surface.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

Understanding of the herein described devices, systems, and methods will be facilitated by consideration of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like numerals refer to like parts. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram of a healthy eye;



FIG. 2 illustrates an image formed in a healthy eye, with a shape that matches the shape of the retina;



FIG. 3 illustrates the difference between the shape of the image surface and the surface of the retina;



FIG. 4 illustrates the image surface shape being matched to the retinal surface shape in accordance with the disclosure;



FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of an optical system in accordance with the disclosure;



FIG. 6 illustrates a method of matching an image surface shape to an retinal shape in accordance with the disclosure; and



FIG. 7 is a simplified diagram of a system for carrying out the method shown in FIG. 6, in accordance with the disclosure.





SUMMARY

The present invention is and includes an intraocular lens (IOL), system, and method. The IOL, system and method may include having a base lens and a complementary lens selected to form a curved image surface matching a retina surface when placed in an eye's line of sight.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It is to be understood that the figures and descriptions provided herein may have been simplified to illustrate elements that are relevant for a clear understanding of the present invention, while eliminating, for the purpose of clarity, other elements found in typical vision correcting lenses, lens systems, and methods. Those of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that other elements and/or steps may be desirable and/or necessary to implement the devices, systems, and methods described herein. However, because such elements and steps are well known in the art, and because they do not facilitate a better understanding of the present invention, a discussion of such elements and steps may not be provided herein. The present disclosure is deemed to inherently include all such elements, variations, and modifications to the disclosed elements and methods that would be known to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.


The present disclosure describes a compound-lens IOL that may be part of an optical system and method, and that may, alone or in the optical system and method, match an image surface shape to the shape of an eye's retina. The IOLs, systems, and methods disclosed herein provide improved vision, including improved peripheral vision and night vision.


The disclosure also describes surgically implantable intra-ocular elements, contact lenses, spectacle lenses, and corneal inlays, as well as corneal reshaping procedures and combinations of the foregoing, and may provide the aforementioned matching. The present invention may also include other refractive corrections, such as accommodating ophthalmic corrections, higher order aberration corrections, adjustable refractive corrections, and multifocal refractive corrections, by way of non-limiting example, and that may also provide the aspects described herein.


The herein described devices, systems, and methods match an image surface to the shape of the retina. In particular, one or more intraocular lenses are used to achieve a desired image surface that matches the curved surface of the retina. Thereby, the subject's vision in well-lit environments is substantively improved over the prior art. In addition, the subject's peripheral vision and vision in dimly lit environments are dramatically improved.



FIG. 1 illustrates a normal eye 100, including cornea 102, lens 104, and retina 106. Light emanating from or reflecting off of objects in the eye's field of view enters the eye through the cornea, and is refracted by the cornea. The light then passes through an aperture in the center of iris 108, called the pupil. The iris is opaque, and forms a stop to block light not passing through the pupil. The light passed then proceeds through lens 104. The lens adjusts its shape in a manner that focuses the light onto the surface of retina 106, forming an image thereon. These structures of the eye form an optical system with a central optical axis, OA-OA′, that intersects the retina near fovea 112.


In a normal eye, the lens focuses light from objects in the entire field of view onto the curved surface of retina 106, forming an image of the visual field thereon. Photoreceptor cells in the retina react to the light and send signals through optic disc 114 (the “blind spot”) to optic nerve 110, and thence to the brain (not shown). The optic disc represents the beginning of the optic nerve 110 to the brain. In the brain, the signals are perceived as the objects in the visual field. FIG. 2 illustrates an image being formed on the retina surface by the natural lens, wherein the image surface matches the shape of the retina surface.


During cataract surgery an IOL is surgically implanted in the subject's eye, typically at the location at which the natural lens resided. An IOL is made of a refractive material, and is designed to focus light entering the eye onto the retina.


In general a single IOL is used, and it is designed so that the field of view is in focus only at the point at which the central axis of the optical system of the eye intersects the retina, while ignoring the off-axis properties of the eye and its optical system. The result leads to suboptimal vision, due at least to uncorrected field curvature and oblique astigmatism of the cornea/lens system, also known as marginal or radial astigmatism.



FIG. 3 illustrates the typical situation where the IOL is designed to focus light entering the eye from the left (as shown) through the cornea onto the retina. The prior art practice is to design the IOL to focus light only at a single point, where the central axis of the optical system, including the cornea and IOL, intersects the retina, and thereby the off-axis properties of both the optical system and the retina are ignored. As illustrated in FIG. 3, the image surface forms in front of the retina except where the optical axis intersects it, i.e., the image surface is less flat than the retina (i.e., is “more curved”). In other cases (not shown), the image surface may be formed behind the retina except where the optical axis intersects it, i.e., the image surface is flatter than the retina. As a result, in either case the image formed on the rest of the retina is blurred.


Compound lenses comprising a plurality of lens elements can be used to correct for these effects. However, prior art compound lenses are typically designed to provide an image surface that is flat, not curved. For example, imaging devices such as film, charged couple devices (CCDs), etc. that used in cameras, telescopes, microscopes, and the like have a flat (i.e., not curved) surface on which the image is formed. The surface on which etched components are formed by focusing light with compound lenses in semiconductor manufacturing is also flat. Accordingly, the compound lenses for use in such applications are typically designed to form a flat image. In contrast, the image surface produced by the herein disclosed devices, systems, and methods is curved to match the curved surface of the actual retina of a particular subject's measured eyeball.


Retinal shapes vary greatly between individuals. For example, different refractive groups, such as those with myopia (nearsighted) and those with hyperopia (farsighted), have been determined to have generally different retinal shapes (see, e.g., Atchison D A, Pritchard N, Schmid K L, Scott D H, Jones C E, Pope J M, Shape Of The Retinal Surface In Emmetropia And Myopia, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005, 46:2698-2707, the entirety of which is incorporated herein as if fully set forth). Therefore biometry, including measuring the dimensions and retinal shape of a particular subject's eye, must be carried out before implanting an IOL. Preferably, such biometry can be performed using one or more of Optical coherence tomography (OCT), confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (cSLO), Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the like. Once the biometry has been completed and the eye dimensions and retinal shape are known, IOLs can be selected or designed that will form an image surface that matches the shape of the retina surface of the measured eye.


The image surface of an optical system is determined by the tangential and sagittal surfaces arising from oblique astigmatism, together with field (Petzval) curvature. In embodiments, two or more lenses can be incorporated into the IOL design to account for this image surface. Depending on the image shape desired to be formed, different combinations of lenses having positive and negative powers can be incorporated into the IOL design. The Petzval surface for a positive lens (i.e., a convex lens) bends inward, while that of a negative lens (i.e., a concave lens) bends outward. Thus, positive and negative lenses can be combined into a single compound IOL or IOL system that matches the image surface to the measured retina surface.


In an exemplary method of selecting or designing an IOL or IOL system, a desired IOL power is calculated for a particular measured eye in accordance with well-known prior art practices. Then, a positive lens may be selected to be positioned, for example in the posterior chamber, and a negative lens may be selected to be positioned, for example, in the anterior chamber. Such a configuration is illustrated in FIG. 4. The positive and negative lenses are selected to have a combined power equal to the IOL power calculated for the eye's deficiencies. In addition, the lenses are selected to achieve a particular Petzval surface radius that matches that of the retinal surface. The expression for the Petzval curvature is:







1

R
p


=


-

n
N







i
=
1

N









n
i

-

n

i
-
1





n
i



n

i
-
1




R
i










where Rp is the Petzval radius of curvature, and Ri and ni are the radius of curvature and refractive index, respectively, of the ith lens surface of the combined IOL lenses. It is desired to match Rp to the radius of curvature of the subject's measured eye. To do so, lenses are selected with lens surfaces that have Ri and ni which, when combined in accordance with the equation above, result in the desired Petzval radius.


In an exemplary operation, a subject's eye is measured, and it is determined that the retina's radius of curvature is about 17.0 mm, and the corneal anterior radius of curvature is about 7.8 mm, and the corneal posterior radius of curvature is about 6.4 mm. The cornea has a refractive index of 1.375. In accordance with standard prior art practices, it is determined that a standard 20 diopter (20 D) positive monofocal IOL results in the desired focus at the central optical axis on the retina. In addition, the optical system of the eye, including the cornea and the standard 20 D IOL, is determined to have a Petzval radius of about −17.7 mm, i.e., larger than the radius of curvature of the retina. This results in an image surface that is somewhat flatter than the measured retinal shape. Therefore, the image formed on the retina is out of focus except at the paraxial region. To match the image surface to the retinal surface so that the image formed is in focus everywhere on the retina, the Petzval radius of the optical system must be reduced.


To reduce the Petzval radius, the single standard IOL of the prior art can be replaced with two lenses. One lens is a positive lens that is stronger than 20 D, and is designed or selected (hereinafter collectively referred to as “selected”) for implantation at a select position in the posterior chamber. A second, negative lens is selected for implantation at a select position in the anterior chamber. The two lenses properly configured will result in an effective power of 20 D as before, but will have a Petzval radius of −17.0 mm so that the image surface matches the retinal surface. For example, a positive 40 D IOL may be selected for placement in the posterior-chamber, and a negative IOL may be selected for placement in the anterior chamber such that the resulting optical system has a Petzval radius of about −17.0 mm.


In the case where the Petzval surface's radius of curvature is smaller than the radius of curvature of the retinal surface, the opposite approach may be used. In an exemplary operation suitable for this case, a subject's eye is measured and it is again determined that the retina's radius of curvature is about 19.0 mm. As before, in accordance with standard prior art practices it may be determined that a standard 20 diopter (20 D) positive monofocal IOL results in the desired focus at the central optical axis on the retina. In this case, however, the optical system of the eye, including the cornea and the standard 20 D IOL, is determined to have a Petzval radius of about −18.3 mm. This results in an image surface that is less flat than the measured retinal shape, as illustrated in FIG. 3. The image formed on the retina is again out of focus except for the paraxial region. But in this case, to match the image surface to the retinal surface so that the image formed is in focus everywhere on the retina, the Petzval radius of the optical system must be increased.


To increase the Petzval radius, the single standard IOL can be replaced with two lenses. One lens is a positive lens that is weaker than 20 D, and is selected for implantation at a select position in the posterior chamber. A second positive lens is selected for implantation at a select position in the anterior chamber. The two lenses properly configured will result in an effective power of 20 D as before, but will have a Petzval radius of −19.0 mm so that the image surface matches the retinal surface. For example, a positive 10 D IOL may be selected for placement in the posterior-chamber, and a second positive IOL may be selected for placement in the anterior chamber such that the resulting optical system has a Petzval radius of about −19.0 mm.


Thus, in either case, two IOLs may be selected which, when properly configured, result in a Petzval radius that matches the shape of the retina. This assumes that the shape of the retina is such that it can be matched with only two lenses. Some more complicated retinal shapes may be matched using more elaborate optical systems comprising more than two lenses, and/or non-spherical lenses, or lenses formed with bumps or depressions disposed so that the resulting image surface formed matches the surface of the retina, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art in light of the disclosure herein.


In various embodiments, one or more of the plurality of IOLs used may be fully refractive, fully diffractive (see, e.g., Morris G M, Buralli D A, Federico R J. Diffractive Lenses For Vision Correction. USA: Apollo Optical Systems, LLC, Rochester, N.Y. 2006, the entirety of which is incorporated herein as if fully set forth), or have a combination of diffractive and refractive surfaces (i.e., a hybrid lens). Selecting appropriate combinations of refractive, diffractive, and/or hybrid lenses can extend the range of shapes to which an image surface can be tuned. Notably, unlike the fully refractive lenses commonly used in IOLs, which always have a curved image surface, diffractive lenses can have a flat image surface (see, e.g., Buralli D A, Morris G M, Rogers J R, Optical Performance Of Holographic Kinoforms, Appl Opt 1989; 28:976-983, the entirety of which is incorporated herein as if fully set forth). Accordingly, using one or more diffractive surfaces on one or more of the lenses can enhance the range of retina surface shapes that can be matched.


Various embodiments include compound lenses in which a plurality of optical system characteristics may be modified to achieve an image surface that matches the shape of a particular measured retina. These characteristics can include, with regard to each lens: selecting a size, shape, and thickness of the lens; selecting each surface of the lens to be refractive or diffractive; selecting an index of refraction of a homogeneous material from which the lens is formed, or forming the lens from a material having one or more refraction index gradients, each gradient extending smoothly or in discrete steps from a low value to a high value; selecting a distance of the lens along the optical axis from a fixed point on the axis such as a surface of the cornea or the retina; selecting an orientation of each surface of the lens about the optical axis in a plane normal (perpendicular) to the optical axis; placing the lens in a select plane that is not normal to the optical axis, or using a lens having a surface that is not normal to the optical axis; or any other physical characteristic of the lens or its placement in the system. The characteristics can also include, with regard to combining a plurality of lenses: selecting a number of lenses to combine; selecting an order of the lenses from the cornea to the retina or vice versa; or any other physical characteristic of the lens system or its placement.


In an embodiment, once the IOL system is designed, each IOL of the system is individually implanted in the eye. In another embodiment, a plurality of lenses may be combined to form a single compound IOL unit, such as an enclosure or envelope that contains a plurality of lens elements the entirety of which can be implanted together. Such an enclosure can include structural elements to secure each lens element's position and orientation within the enclosure. Such a compound IOL can be inserted in a single operation into the capsular bag after the natural lens is removed. Further, one or more IOLs or compound IOLs may be used in conjunction with a non-implanted, i.e., an exterior, lens or lenses.


In various embodiments, the calculations performed to design an optical system that matches the shape of a retina can be simplified by standardizing at least some of the parameters of the optical system, and preferably as many parameters as is practicable to achieve an acceptable result. An acceptable result may be determined by how closely the image surface formed by the optical system matches the measured shape of the retina. In an exemplary embodiment, an IOL system may be designed with first and second discrete IOL elements that may be individually implanted in the eye. The first IOL may be a positive lens disposed at a “standard” location within the posterior chamber and formed of a homogeneous material having a “standard” index of refraction. The second lens may be disposed at a “standard” location within the anterior chamber, and may be formed of a homogeneous material. No diffracting surfaces, surfaces tilted from the optical axis, surfaces with bumps or depressions, or the like may be used in this example. In this simplified case, the parameters of the first lens that must still be selected include its height, width, shape, thickness at the center of the lens, and the radii of curvature of its two surfaces. The second IOL may be either positive or negative, and its height, width, shape, thickness at the center of the lens, and the radii of curvature of its two surfaces must also be selected. The second lens may also be formed of a material having the same index of refraction as the first lens. However, it is noted that the Petzval radius of curvature of a lens depends not only on the radius of curvature of each of its surfaces, but on the lens' refractive index as well. Consequently, the range of Petzval radii that can be achieved by using the second lens, and hence by the entire optical system, can be extended by selecting a homogenous material for the second lens having a higher or lower refractive index than the material of the first lens.


In an embodiment, all lenses can be placed in the posterior chamber inside the capsular bag. It is noted that an IOL system having two optical components is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,238,201, entitled ACCOMMODATING INTRAOCULAR LENS SYSTEM WITH ENHANCED RANGE OF MOTION, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. That system comprises an anterior optic and a posterior optic coupled to anterior and posterior haptic arms, respectively. The '201 patent relates to other than the matching of the image surface to the shape of the retina that is included the herein disclosed devices, systems, and methods. Rather, the haptic arms are arranged so that a forward movement of the posterior optic actuates a substantially larger forward movement in the anterior optic. This supports the ability of the eye to modify its refractive power when viewing objects at different distances, called “accommodation”. Nevertheless, in an embodiment, the shape and power of each optic in such a system may be selected to achieve a Petzval surface that matches the shape of the retina in accordance with the present disclosure.


In another embodiment, one lens may be placed in the anterior or posterior chamber, and the other lens may be a surface profile disposed on or within the cornea, the surface profile having been formed by a laser, (e.g., using a LASIK, LASEK, or PRK procedure) resulting in the reshaping of the cornea.


As shown in FIG. 5, in an embodiment an aperture can be added to the optical system as an artificial stop, such that it is the limiting aperture of the optical system of the eye instead of the pupil. Adding the aperture does not affect the Petzval surface. However, oblique astigmatism can be improved by selecting an appropriate stop size and position.


Referring now to FIG. 6, there is shown a method 500 for matching an optical system image surface to the surface of a retina. Method 500 includes measuring the dimensions of a subject eye and the shape of the surface of its retina, 510. The lens power needed to focus an image at the intersection of the optical axis of the eye on the retina is calculated, 520. The shape of the image surface produced at the retina by that lens can then be determined and compared to the shape of the retina, 530. In the case where the image surface is flatter than the retina surface, a base lens power may be selected that has a higher power than the default lens power, 540. In that case, a negative complementary lens may be selected or designed that adjusts the image shape of the optical system to match the retina shape, 550. Conversely, in the case where the image surface is less flat (i.e., more curved) than the retina surface, a base lens power may be selected that has a lower power than the default lens power, 540. In that case, a positive complementary lens may be selected or designed that adjusts the image shape of the optical system to match the retina shape, 550. If needed, additional optical elements may be selected, for example, to correct any residual image aberrations, 560. An IOL system can then be selected or assembled that includes the base lens, the complimentary lens, and any additional optical elements, 570. The IOL system can then be implanted in the subject eye, 580.


As illustrated in FIG. 7, the present invention may be implemented using a clinical system 300 that is capable of assessing the eye's biometry and of performing the calculations set forth in method 500. The system 300 may include a biometric reader 301, a computing processor 302, and a computer readable storage device 304 in data communication with the processor 302. The computer readable storage device may include a volatile or non-volatile memory, a magnetic or optical drive, or the like. Storage device 304 may store therein an array of values 308 such as properties of various optical elements in various configurations. The storage device may also store therein sequences of instructions 310 which, when executed by the processor 302, cause the processor 302 to select or design an IOL system configured for implantation into the eye of the subject presenting the biometric readings to biometric reader 301. The array of values 308 may comprise data used or obtained from method 500 or other methods consistent with embodiments of the invention. The sequence of instructions 310 may include one or more steps of method 500 or other methods consistent with embodiments of the invention.


The processor 302 may be embodied in a general purpose computer, such as a desktop or laptop computer, and/or the processing, storage, and/or other resources of a computing cloud accessible through a network. The processor 302 may comprise or be coupled to hardware associated with biometric reader 301 operable to select or design an IOL system for placement into the eye of the subject that matches an image shape to the retina shape. In embodiments, the system 300 may be configured to be coupled to or receive data from another device, such as one or more instruments for obtaining measurements of a subject eye. Alternatively, the system 300 may be embodied in a handheld device that may be adapted to be electronically and/or wirelessly coupled to one or more other devices.


In another embodiment, rather than using a dual lens system, a single lens may be used with two different refractive indeces. In the thin lens approximation with lenses placed tightly together, the Petzval sum is P1/n1+P2/n2+ . . . , where P is equal to power. In a single lens embodiment, one part of the lens may be comprised of a high refractive index and another part of the lens comprised of a low refractive index. By way of example, the anterior or posterior part of the lens may have a high refractive index and the opposing side may have a low refractive index. Refractive power can then be appropriately distributed to make the Petzval surface of the IOL plus the cornea match the retina.


In certain embodiments a single lens, single refractive index material may be used. Certain IOL designs rely on having a well-defined shape factor. Additionally, the power is determined to give optimal focus on the fovea. However, if the lens is designed with enough thickness, preferably in the shape of a meniscus lens, the Petzval curvature may be optimized to match the retinal radius of curvature. The procedure for designing such a lens may comprise of:


1) receiving a measurement of at least a shape of a retina of a subject eye, wherein the retina has a radius of curvature;


2) determining a desired shape factor for an IOL, wherein the shape factor is determined from optical factors, engineering constraints and/or anatomical constraints;


3) determining a total IOL power for focusing light onto the retina surface of the subject eye;


4) determining the power of each respective surface of the IOL from a thickness of the IOL, the desired total IOL power and the desired shape factor; and


5) comparing a Petzval sum to the retinal radius of curvature. If the Petzval sum does not match the retinal radius, the power of the two surfaces may be increased or decreased. This adjustment of the power of the surfaces may be done while keeping the shape factor constant. The change of surfaces will change the power of the IOL, so the thickness of the IOL may be adjusted to correct the power. This adjustment of IOL thickness does not impact the Petzval sum or the shape factor. An advantage of this embodiment is that a single refractive index material may be used.


Although the invention has been described and illustrated in exemplary forms with a certain degree of particularity, it is noted that the description and illustrations have been made by way of example only. Numerous changes in the details of construction and combination and arrangement of parts and steps may be made. Accordingly, such changes are intended to be included in the invention, the scope of which is defined by the claims.

Claims
  • 1. An intraocular lens (IOL) system for a human eye including a retina having a retina surface, comprising: a base lens; and a complementary lens; wherein a lens power of the base lens is configured to have a lens power relative to a default lens power; wherein the default lens power comprises the lens power needed to focus an image at an intersection of an optical axis of the eye on the retina of the eye, and wherein the lens power of the base lens is configured based upon image surface flatness relative to the retina surface; wherein the base lens and complementary lens are configured to achieve a Petzval surface radius, which when placed on a line of sight, form a curved image surface that matches the retina surface of the eye in which the base lens and complementary lens are inserted.
  • 2. The IOL of claim 1, wherein the base lens is a positive lens.
  • 3. The IOL of claim 2, wherein the base lens is suitable for insertion into the posterior chamber of the eye.
  • 4. The IOL of claim 1, wherein the complementary lens is a negative lens.
  • 5. The IOL of claim 4, wherein the complementary lens is suitable for insertion in one of the posterior chamber of the eye and the anterior chamber of the eye.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a divisional of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/196,762, filed Mar. 4, 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/776,184 filed on Mar. 11, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (210)
Number Name Date Kind
3367734 Karl et al. Feb 1968 A
4581031 Koziol et al. Apr 1986 A
4592630 Okazaki Jun 1986 A
4624538 MacFarlane Nov 1986 A
4637697 Freeman Jan 1987 A
4642112 Freeman Feb 1987 A
4648878 Kelman Mar 1987 A
4655565 Freeman Apr 1987 A
4666446 Koziol et al. May 1987 A
4778462 Grendahl Oct 1988 A
4795462 Grendahl Jan 1989 A
4798608 Grendahl Jan 1989 A
4798609 Grendahl Jan 1989 A
4828558 Kelman May 1989 A
4932970 Portney Jun 1990 A
4995714 Cohen Feb 1991 A
4995715 Cohen Feb 1991 A
5016977 Baude et al. May 1991 A
5056908 Cohen Oct 1991 A
5066301 Wiley Nov 1991 A
5089023 Swanson Feb 1992 A
5096285 Silberman Mar 1992 A
5114220 Baude et al. May 1992 A
5117306 Cohen May 1992 A
5120120 Cohen Jun 1992 A
5121979 Cohen Jun 1992 A
5121980 Cohen Jun 1992 A
5144483 Cohen Sep 1992 A
5225858 Portney Jul 1993 A
5229797 Futhey et al. Jul 1993 A
5354334 Fedorov et al. Oct 1994 A
5549669 Jansen Aug 1996 A
5652638 Roffman et al. Jul 1997 A
5683457 Gupta et al. Nov 1997 A
5699142 Lee et al. Dec 1997 A
5728156 Gupta et al. Mar 1998 A
5748282 Freeman May 1998 A
5760871 Kosoburd et al. Jun 1998 A
5777719 Williams et al. Jul 1998 A
5796462 Roffman et al. Aug 1998 A
5968094 Werblin et al. Oct 1999 A
6126283 Wen et al. Oct 2000 A
6126286 Portney Oct 2000 A
6142625 Sawano et al. Nov 2000 A
6183084 Chipman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197057 Peyman et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210005 Portney Apr 2001 B1
6338559 Williams et al. Jan 2002 B1
6457826 Lett Oct 2002 B1
6464355 Gil Oct 2002 B1
6464725 Skottun Oct 2002 B2
6474814 Griffin Nov 2002 B1
6488708 Sarfarazi Dec 2002 B2
6491721 Freeman et al. Dec 2002 B2
6527389 Portney Mar 2003 B2
6533416 Fermigier et al. Mar 2003 B1
6533814 Jansen Mar 2003 B1
6536899 Fiala Mar 2003 B1
6537317 Steinert et al. Mar 2003 B1
6547822 Lang Apr 2003 B1
6554859 Lang et al. Apr 2003 B1
6557992 Dwyer et al. May 2003 B1
6609793 Norrby et al. Aug 2003 B2
6705729 Piers et al. Mar 2004 B2
6808262 Chapoy et al. Oct 2004 B2
6830332 Piers et al. Dec 2004 B2
6846326 Zadno-Azizi et al. Jan 2005 B2
6849091 Cumming Feb 2005 B1
6851803 Wooley et al. Feb 2005 B2
6913620 Lipshitz Jul 2005 B2
6923539 Simpson et al. Aug 2005 B2
6923540 Ye et al. Aug 2005 B2
6972033 McNicholas Dec 2005 B2
6986578 Jones Jan 2006 B2
7025456 Morris et al. Apr 2006 B2
7025460 Smitth, III Apr 2006 B2
7036931 Lindacher et al. May 2006 B2
7037338 Nagamoto May 2006 B2
7048760 Cumming May 2006 B2
7061693 Zalevsky Jun 2006 B2
7073906 Portney Jul 2006 B1
7137702 Piers et al. Nov 2006 B2
7156516 Morris et al. Jan 2007 B2
7186266 Peyman Mar 2007 B2
7188949 Bandhauer et al. Mar 2007 B2
7238201 Portney et al. Jul 2007 B2
7287852 Fiala Oct 2007 B2
7293873 Dai et al. Nov 2007 B2
7365917 Zalevsky Apr 2008 B2
7377640 Piers et al. May 2008 B2
7410500 Claoue Aug 2008 B2
7441894 Zhang et al. Oct 2008 B2
7475986 Dai et al. Jan 2009 B2
7503655 Smith, III Mar 2009 B2
7615073 Deacon et al. Nov 2009 B2
7665842 Ho et al. Feb 2010 B2
7766482 Smith, III et al. Aug 2010 B2
7871162 Weeber Jan 2011 B2
7997727 Ho et al. Aug 2011 B2
8057034 Ho et al. Nov 2011 B2
8062361 Nguyen et al. Nov 2011 B2
8201943 Hammer et al. Jun 2012 B2
8206442 Sel et al. Jun 2012 B2
8262728 Zhang et al. Sep 2012 B2
8382832 Deacon et al. Feb 2013 B2
8430508 Weeber Apr 2013 B2
8540365 Varnas Sep 2013 B2
8862447 Weeber Oct 2014 B2
8894203 Bradley et al. Nov 2014 B2
9345570 Sieber et al. May 2016 B2
20020044255 Ye Apr 2002 A1
20020101564 Herrick Aug 2002 A1
20020105617 Norrby et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020118337 Perrott et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020176049 Sakai et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030076478 Cox Apr 2003 A1
20030107706 Rubinstein et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030171808 Phillips Sep 2003 A1
20030214629 Luloh et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040021824 Ye et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040085515 Roffman et al. May 2004 A1
20040106992 Lang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111153 Woods et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040150789 Jones Aug 2004 A1
20040156014 Piers et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040230299 Simpson et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040237971 Radhakrishnan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050043794 Geraghty et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050096226 Stock et al. May 2005 A1
20050128432 Altmann Jun 2005 A1
20050203619 Altmann Sep 2005 A1
20050209692 Zhang Sep 2005 A1
20050267575 Nguyen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060009816 Fang et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060030938 Altmann Feb 2006 A1
20060034003 Zalevsky Feb 2006 A1
20060055883 Morris et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058874 Peli Mar 2006 A1
20060066808 Blum et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060098162 Bandhauer et al. May 2006 A1
20060098163 Bandhauer et al. May 2006 A1
20060109421 Ye et al. May 2006 A1
20060116763 Simpson Jun 2006 A1
20060116764 Simpson Jun 2006 A1
20060116765 Blake et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060158611 Piers et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060176572 Fiala Aug 2006 A1
20060227286 Hong et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060238702 Glick et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060244904 Hong et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060247766 Marin Nov 2006 A1
20070052920 Stewart et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070093891 Tabernero et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070129803 Cumming et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070171362 Simpson et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070182917 Zhang et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070182924 Hong et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198083 Sel et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070268453 Hong et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080030677 Simpson Feb 2008 A1
20080161913 Brady et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080161914 Brady et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080212024 Lai Sep 2008 A1
20080269883 Das et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269884 Vannoy Oct 2008 A1
20080269885 Simpson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269886 Simpson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269890 Simpson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080312738 Wanders Dec 2008 A1
20090018652 Hermans et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090062911 Bogaert Mar 2009 A1
20090164008 Hong et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090187242 Weeber et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198326 Zhou et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204211 Angelopoulos et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090210054 Weeber et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090234448 Weeber et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090268155 Weeber Oct 2009 A1
20090268158 Weeber Oct 2009 A1
20090292354 Gontijo et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090295295 Shannon et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090323020 Zhao et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100016961 Hong et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100100177 Zhao Apr 2010 A1
20100100178 Weeber et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100157240 Schmid et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100161048 Schaper, Jr. Jun 2010 A1
20100188636 Pinto et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100204788 Van Aug 2010 A1
20100286771 Zhang et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110130833 Scott et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110149236 Weeber Jun 2011 A1
20110153014 Zhang et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110279912 Fiala Nov 2011 A1
20120277857 Purchase et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130013060 Zadno-Azizi et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130211515 Blum et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130226294 Van et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140022649 Eckhardt Jan 2014 A1
20140168602 Weeber Jun 2014 A1
20140253877 Li et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150005877 Wanders Jan 2015 A1
20150250583 Rosen et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150250585 Rosen et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150265399 Rosen et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150297342 Rosen et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150320547 Rosen et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160067037 Rosen et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160161364 Alarcon et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160193040 Qureshi et al. Jul 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (50)
Number Date Country
0343067 Nov 1989 EP
0457553 Nov 1991 EP
458508 Nov 1991 EP
681198 Nov 1995 EP
0926531 Jun 1999 EP
949529 Oct 1999 EP
1424049 Jun 2004 EP
1818023 Aug 2007 EP
1284687 Dec 2007 EP
1310267 Jan 2008 EP
1424049 Jun 2009 EP
9222264 Dec 1992 WO
9303409 Feb 1993 WO
0019906 Apr 2000 WO
0163344 Aug 2001 WO
0182839 Nov 2001 WO
0189424 Nov 2001 WO
0221194 Mar 2002 WO
03000154 Jan 2003 WO
03009053 Jan 2003 WO
03022137 Mar 2003 WO
2004034129 Apr 2004 WO
2004049979 Jun 2004 WO
2004068214 Aug 2004 WO
04090611 Oct 2004 WO
2004090611 Oct 2004 WO
04096014 Nov 2004 WO
2004096014 Nov 2004 WO
05019906 Mar 2005 WO
06025726 Mar 2006 WO
06047698 May 2006 WO
2006047698 May 2006 WO
06060477 Jun 2006 WO
06060480 Jun 2006 WO
2006060480 Jun 2006 WO
2006067255 Jun 2006 WO
2007092948 Aug 2007 WO
2007133384 Nov 2007 WO
2008045847 Apr 2008 WO
2008065362 Jun 2008 WO
2009076670 Jun 2009 WO
2009142961 Nov 2009 WO
2012074742 Jun 2012 WO
2012083143 Jun 2012 WO
2013028992 Feb 2013 WO
2013059041 Apr 2013 WO
2013105855 Jul 2013 WO
2013185855 Dec 2013 WO
2015136375 Sep 2015 WO
2015136380 Sep 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (45)
Entry
Atchison D.A., et al., “Shape of the Retinal Surface in Emmetropia and Myopia,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Aug. 2005, vol. 46 (8), pp. 2698-2707.
Liou H.L., et al., “The Prediction of Spherical Aberration with Schematic Eyes,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Jan. 1996, vol. 16 (4), pp. 348-354.
Lundstroma L., et al., “Symmetries in Peripheral Ocular Aberrations,” Journal of Modem Optics, Mar. 16, 2011, vol. 58 (19-20), pp. 1690-1695.
Alfonso J.F., et al., “Prospective Study of the Acri.LISA Bifocal Intraocular Lens,” Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery, Nov. 2007, vol. 33 (11), pp. 1930-1935.
Atchison D.A., el al., “Shape of the Retinal Surface in Emmetropia and Myopia,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Aug. 2005, vol. 46 (8), pp. 2698-2707.
Baskaran K., et al., “Benefit of Adaptive Optics Aberration Correction at Preferred Retinal Locus,” Optometry and Vision Science, Sep. 2012, vol. 89 (9), pp. 1417-1423.
Buralli D.A., et al, “Optical Performance Of Holographic Kinoforms,” Applied Optics, Mar. 1989, vol. 28 (5), pp. 976-983.
Canovas C., et al., “Hybrid Adaptive-Optics Visual Simulator,” Optical Letters, Jan. 15, 2010, vol. 35 (2), pp. 196-198.
Cohen A.L., “Practical Design of a Bifocal Hologram Contact Lens or Intraocular Lens,” Applied Optics, Jul. 1, 1992, vol. 31 (19), pp. 3750-3754.
Diffractive Lenses for Extended Depth of Focus and Presbyopic Correction, Presentation from Wavefront Congress held on Feb. 15, 2008, Rochester, New York.
Doskolovich L.L., et al., “Special Diffractive Lenses,” Lens and Optical Systems Design, Apr. 1992, vol. 1780, pp. 393-402.
Escudero-Sanz I., et al., “Off-Axis Aberrations of a Wide-Angle Schematic Eye Model,” Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, Aug. 1999, vol. 16 (8), pp. 1881-1891.
Hoffmann, P.C., et al., “Analysis of Biometry and Prevalence Data for Corneal Astigmatism in 23 239 Eyes,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Sep. 2010, vol. 36(9), pp. 1479-1485.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2015/000989, dated Sep. 8, 2015, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2015/001027, dated Sep. 8, 2015, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2015/001244, dated Nov. 8, 2015, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2015/001588, dated Oct. 15, 2015, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2015/002000, dated Feb. 12, 2016, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/052311, dated Dec. 21, 2012, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/020343, dated May 15, 2014, 10 pages.
Jaeken B., et al., “Comparison of the Optical Image Quality in the Periphery of Phakic and Pseudophakic Eyes,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, May 1, 2013, vol. 54 (5), pp. 3594-3599.
Jafari-Nodoushan M., et al., “Control-Flow Checking Using Branch Instructions,” IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, Dec. 17-20, 2008, pp. 66-72.
Lewis P., et al., “Resolution of Static and Dynamic Stimuli in the Peripheral Visual Field,” Vision Research, Aug. 15, 2011, vol. 51 (16), pp. 1829-1834.
Liou H.L., et al., “Anatomically Accurate, Finite Model Eye for Optical Modeling,” Journal of Optical Society of America, Aug. 1997, vol. 14 (8), pp. 1684-1695.
Lundstroma L., et al., “Symmetries in Peripheral Ocular Aberrations,” Journal of Modern Optics, Mar. 16, 2011, vol. 58 (19-20), pp. 1690-1695.
Marsack J.D., et al., “Metrics of Optical Quality Derived from Wave Aberrations Predict Visual Performance,” Journal of Vision, Apr. 2004, vol. 4 (4), pp. 322-328.
Monsoriu J.A., et al., “Devils Lenses,” Optics Express, Oct. 17, 2007, vol. 15 (21), pp. 13858-13864.
Norrby S., et al., “Model Eyes for Evaluation of Intraocular Lenses,” Applied Optics, Sep. 7, 2007, vol. 46 (26), pp. 6595-6605.
Oh N., et al., “Control-Flow Checking by Software Signatures,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Mar. 2, 2002, vol. 51 (2), pp. 111-122.
Piers P.A., et al., “Eye Models for the Prediction of Contrast Vision in Patients with New Intraocular Lens Designs,” Optics Letters, Apr. 1, 2004, vol. 29 (7), pp. 733-735.
Piers P.A., et al., “Theoretical Comparison of Aberration-Correcting Customized and Aspheric Intraocular Lenses,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, Apr. 2007, vol. 23 (4), pp. 374-384.
Rosen R., et al., “Adaptive Optics for Peripheral Vision,” Journal of Modern Optics, Jul. 10, 2012, vol. 59 (12), pp. 1064-1070.
Rosen R., et al., “Evaluating the Peripheral Optical Effect of Multifocal Contact Lenses,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Nov. 2012, vol. 32 (6), pp. 527-534.
Rosen R., et al., “Have We Misinterpreted the Study of Hoogerheide Et Al. (1971)?,” Optometry and Vision Science, Aug. 2012, vol. 89 (8), pp. 1235-1237.
Rosen R., et al., “Sign-dependent Sensitivity to Peripheral Defocus for Myopes Due to Aberrations,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Oct. 17, 2012, vol. 53 (11), pp. 7176-7182.
Rosen R., et al., “Influence of Optical Defocus on Peripheral Vision,” Visual Psychophysics and Physiological Optics, Jan. 2011, vol. 52 (1), pp. 318-323.
Rosen R., “Peripheral Vision: Adaptive Optics and Psychophysics,” Doctoral Thesis Department of Applied Physics Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden Apr. 2013, 86 pages.
Shammas J.H., “Intraocular Lens Power Calculations,” Chapter 12, “Ultrasound Measurement of the Challenging Eye”, Slack Incorporated, p. 117, Copyright 2004.
Siedlecki D., et al., “Radial Gradient index Intraocular Lens: a Theoretical Model,” Journal of Modern Optics, Feb. 20-Mar. 10, 2008, vol. 55 (4-5), pp. 639-647.
Terwee T., et al., “Visualization of the Retinal Image in an Eye Model With Spherical and Aspheric, Diffractive, and Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, Mar. 2008, vol. 24 (3), pp. 223-232.
Van Den Berg T.J., “Analysis of Intraocular Straylight, Especially in Relation to Age,” Optometry and Vision Science, Feb. 1995, vol. 72 (2), pp. 52-59.
Van Meeteren A., “Calculations on the Optical Modulation Transfer Function of the Human Eye for White Light,” Optica Acta, May 1974, vol. 21 (5), pp. 395-412.
Villegas E.A., et al., “Correlation between Optical and Psychophy, Sical Parameters as a Function of Defocus,” Optometry and Vision Science, Jan. 1, 2002, vol. 79 (1), pp. 60-67.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2017/000318, dated Aug. 4, 2017, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2017/000553, dated Aug. 28, 2017, 19 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170209258 A1 Jul 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61776184 Mar 2013 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14196762 Mar 2014 US
Child 15424577 US