Intraocular lens with longitudinally rigid plate haptic

Abstract
An intraocular lens for insertion into a capsular bag of an eye comprises: an optic; and at least one plate haptic coupled to the optic by one or more flexible connecting members. The plate haptic with projections which are designed to engage the periphery of the capsular bag to center and fixate the intraocular lens within. The haptic includes a longitudinally rigid frame to resist deformation of the haptic.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Accommodating Intraocular Lenses were developed in the early 1900's and have been sold in Europe for the last ten years and later in the U.S. They function by means of forward movement of the optic upon constriction of the ciliary muscle which increases the pressure in the posterior part of the eye with a simultaneous decrease in pressure in the front part of the eye pressure. The reverse pressure changes take place upon relaxation of the ciliary muscle, which results in the backwards movement of the lens for distance vision. The forward movement of the lens optic enables the patient implanted with the lens to automatically change their vision from distance to see at intermediate and near.


The currently marketed accommodating plate haptic intraocular lenses provide excellent distance and intermediate vision but sometimes require weak, +1.00, reading glasses for prolonged reading, for seeing small print, or reading in dim lighting conditions. The embodiments relating to the present invention presented herein are designed to substantially reduce the need for any reading glasses


It is important for intraocular lenses to have a consistent location along the axis of the eye to provide good uncorrected distance vision and to center in the middle of the vertical meridian of the eye. Without excellent uncorrected distance vision there is no point in implanting an accommodating lens whose function is to enable patients to be without glasses. With the advent of the new premium lenses, not only are the above requirements important but also the vision is likely to be better if the lens after implantation and centration, is without any tilt which can reduce the quality of vision particularly if the lens optic has a toric component or is a multifocal.


The word “haptic” has been used to describe an attachment to intraocular lenses. The original intraocular lens consisted of a single optic. These single optic lenses, without any attachments, were first implanted in London by Harold Ridley in 1949. These lenses frequently de-centered and it was discovered that there was a need to center and fixate the lens optic in the vertical meridian of the eye.


The first attachments to the optic were called “haptics”. They consisted of multiple flexible loops of various designs, J loops, C loops, closed loops and flexible radial arms.


Later, these loops which became commonly referred to as “haptics” were replaced in some lens designs with plates, called “plate haptics”. It is necessary to fixate and center the plate haptics within the capsular bag and so loops or fingers are extended from the distal lateral ends of the plate haptics. These can be of the same material as the plate or integrally molded into the plate lens design during manufacturing, and can be made of polyimide, prolene, PMMA or titanium.


When the accommodating lens plate haptic is fibrosed into the capsular bag of an eye after cataract surgery, sometimes several weeks or months following the surgery, a complication can occur. The lens can deform to a “Z” dislocated shape. This occurs when there is little sandwiching of the distal tip of the plate haptics between the remaining anterior and the posterior walls of the capsular bag.


The current accommodating lenses utilize an oblong lens body design having plate haptics connected to the lens optics by a single transverse hinge across the plate haptic. This promotes accommodation by allowing the optic to move forwards and backwards relative to the outer, or distal, ends of the plates. Such accommodating lenses are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,476,514 and 5,496,366, both to Cumming, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference. However, these designs do not permit adequate movement of the optic to a change in vitreous cavity pressure to allow many patients to read comfortably at near without glasses.


In order to increase the movement of the optic to respond to the increase in vitreous cavity pressure that occurs during constriction of the ciliary muscle, the transverse hinge may be weakened by elongating the hinge base or reducing the width of the hinge. However, elongating the hinge base would destabilize the lens optic, and making the hinge narrower would make it prone to tilting.


BRIEF SUMMARY PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

An intraocular lens design according to an embodiment of the present invention is described that overcomes the deficiencies of present designs noted above.


A flat, longitudinal intraocular lens is provided, having distinct separate plate haptics that are rigid longitudinally, and that extend to partially surround the optic. The flat plate haptics may have a groove or hinge across the width of its proximal ends adjacent to the optic. This hinge may be weakened by having at least two separate spaced apart narrow hinges on each edge of the plate haptics, thereby, reducing the overall width of the hinge. This plural strap design stabilizes the lens optic while reducing the resistance of the optic to a change in vitreous cavity pressure, thereby, allowing more movement of the optic along the axis of the eye. Further stabilization is achieved by making the haptics as wide, or wider, than the optic and extending the lateral proximal ends of the plate haptics to partially surround the optic. The plate haptics may be made rigid longitudinally by incorporating into the length of the haptics a rigid frame structure.


Thus, an intraocular lens according to the present invention may stabilize the solid, single, flexible lens optic, prevent tilt, provide more movement of the optic for better near vision and center and fixate the lens in the capsular bag with the finger-like flexible loops at the distal ends of the plates.


Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following more detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the presently described apparatus and method of its use.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)

Illustrated in the accompanying drawing(s) is at least preferred embodiment of the present invention In such drawing(s):



FIG. 1 illustrates a top view of an intraocular lens according to an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 illustrates a top view of a haptic according to an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 illustrates a top view of exemplary frames according to an embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 4 illustrates a side view of a hinge according to an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The above described drawing figures illustrate the described invention and method of use in at least one of its preferred, best mode embodiment, which is further defined in detail in the following description. Those having ordinary skill in the art may be able to make alterations and modifications to what is described herein without departing from its spirit and scope. Therefore, it should be understood that what is illustrated is set forth only for the purposes of example and should not be taken as a limitation on the scope of the present apparatus and its method of use.


As illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 3, an intraocular accommodating lens 10 for insertion into an eye having a ciliary body, comprises: a lens optic 100 having a longitudinal axis and a normal axis perpendicular thereto, and one or more plate haptics 200 coupled to the optic via at least one connecting member 300.


The lens optic is preferably constructed of a flexible optical material such as silicone, hydrogel, acrylic material, but may be made of any similar material. Additionally, the lens optic is preferably shaped so as to be biconvex, refractive, diffractive, plano-convex, Fresnell, spheric, aspheric, toric or multifocal.


In a preferred embodiment, at least two plate haptics 200 are longitudinally coupled to opposing ends of the lens optic 100. As illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 3, each plate haptic 200 may comprise: a frame 250, a body 210, and at least one projection 260.


Turning now to FIG. 1, the body of the haptic comprises at least one lateral end 220 a proximal end 230, a distal end 240 and a plate 270. The haptic body is preferably rigid longitudinally, and is preferably made of silicone, hydrogel, acrylic, or similar material. In one embodiment, the plate haptic body may be of substantially the same width as the lens optic. Thus, the lateral ends may extend substantially parallel to each other and substantially tangential to the lens optic. In another embodiment, the lateral and proximal ends of the plate haptics may comprise a proximal flange, or paddle, 222, as shown in FIG. 3, that partially surrounds the optic and makes the haptic at least as wide as the optic. In one embodiment, the haptic is wider than the optic. Such construction offers increased stabilization of the optic and the plate. Preferably, the width of the haptic is approximately between 3.0 and 7.0 mm. Ideally the width of the haptic is between 4.50 and 6.00 mm. Preferably the haptic thickness is between 0.20 to 0.75 mm. The optic diameter preferably varies from 4.5-7.0 mm, and in one embodiment is approximately 5.0 mm.


As shown in FIG. 1, the plate haptics may further compose at least one substantially flexible projection 260 extending substantially from the distal end. The projection may comprise: an open loop, a closed loop, a tangential extension, a notch or indentation in the distal end 240, or a lateral extension of the distal end, or any combination of the preceding or other geometries known in the art. The flexible projections or fingers may be of the same material as the plate haptic and/or the lens optic, or may be polyimide, prolene, polymethylmethanylate (PMMA), titanium or similar material. In one embodiment, the projection comprises a homogenous integral part of the plate haptic body. In another embodiment, the projection comprises a distinct unit set into the plate haptic during molding. Preferably, the projections measure from 2.0 to 4.0 mm in length extending from the distal end of the haptic body and are flexible extending to a transverse diameter that exceeds the diameter of the capsular bag.


As illustrated in FIG. 1, the plate haptic may further compose a frame 250 operable to strengthen the plate haptic and substantially reduce the flexibility of the plate haptic in at least one direction. In one embodiment, the frame comprises a plurality of substantially rigid, longitudinally arrayed frame segments 252. The frame may be formed separately and embedded within the body, or may be unitarily formed therewith. In one embodiment, the frame comprises a thickened area of the haptic body. Additionally, the frame and projection may or may not be unitarily constructed. Furthermore, the frame may be of the same material as the plate haptic and/or the lens optic, such as silicone, acrylic, hydrogels, or other similar material.


The intraocular lens further comprises at least one connecting member 300, shown in FIGS. 1-4, connecting the plate haptic to the optic. The connecting members are preferably flexible and extend substantially between the plate haptic and the lens optic. The plate haptic is affixed at its proximal end to the connecting member, which is in turn affixed to the lens optic. In one embodiment, the connecting member preferably extends radially from a peripheral edge 110 of the lens optic and is affixed to the proximal end of the plate haptic, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 3. In another embodiment, the connecting member extends substantially longitudinally from the peripheral edge of the lens optic and is affixed to the proximal end of the plate haptic, as shown in FIG. 2.


As illustrated in FIG. 1, in one embodiment, the flexible connecting member may comprise at least one strap 310 and a hinge 320 configured to traverse the width of the strap, the strap being flexible about the hinge. In one embodiment, the hinge traverses the strap substantially tangential to the peripheral edge of the lens optic. In another embodiment, the hinge traverses the strap in a substantially lateral direction. The hinge may comprise a groove 320 traversing the strap, as shown in FIG. 4, but multiple grooves may be present without departing from the scope of the invention. As shown in FIG. 4C, in one embodiment, the hinge comprises an upper groove 322 and a lower groove 324 preferably situated on opposing sides of the strap. The hinge thickness may be approximately half the thickness of the strap, or may be, between 0.1 and 0.3 mm.


As illustrated in FIG. 1, in one embodiment, two or more straps couple each of two plate haptics to the optic thereby tending to substantially prevent tilting of the optic with respect to the haptics. In the above embodiment, the straps are preferably removed an equal distance from the longitudinal axis and form an aperture therebetween. In another embodiment, a single strap couples each plate haptic to the optic.


In another embodiment, the connecting member comprises the proximal end of the plate haptic body, the proximal end being substantially thinner than the remainder of the plate haptic body. Preferably, the connecting member is approximately 1 to 1.5 mm long and is thinner than the plate haptic body.


According to one embodiment, when the intraocular lens is implanted into the capsular bag of the eye, the plate haptics and its loops contact the periphery of the capsular bag and operate to support the optic within the eye and to substantially align and fix the lens into the capsular bag, thereby centering the lens optic along the optical axis of the eye. The flexible projections extend beyond the diameter of the capsular bag and the lateral distal plate extensions contact the periphery of the capsular bag, increasing the contact area of the lens within the bag to provide additional fixation and support to for the lens within the capsular bag. In some embodiments, the distal end of the plate haptic comprises a distal flange 240 that engages the capsular bag and further increases the contact area. The distal end of the plates may be either ticker or thinner than the proximal body of the plate haptic.


As illustrated in FIG. 4, the ciliary muscle exerts radial pressure on the ends of the haptics. The longitudinally rigid plate haptics, which naturally vault backwards when placed into the capsular bag, are thus moved centrally and posteriorly towards the optic. Because of the frame, the haptic and its proximal lateral extensions are substantially rigid in the longitudinal direction and they therefore resist bending to the radial force exerted by the ciliary muscle.


The longitudinal length or circumference diameter of the intraocular lens is preferably between 10.0 to 12.0 mm.


The enablements described in detail above are considered novel over the prior art of record and are considered critical to the operation of at least one aspect of the invention and to the achievement of the above described objectives. The words used in this specification to describe the instant embodiments are to be understood not only in the sense of their commonly defined meanings, but to include by special definition in this specification: structure, material or acts beyond the scope of the commonly defined meanings. Thus if an element can be understood in the context of this specification as including more than one meaning, then its use must be understood as being generic to all possible meanings supported by the specification and by the word or words describing the element.


The definitions of the words or drawing elements described herein are meant to include not only the combination of elements which are literally set forth, but all equivalent structure, material or acts for performing substantially the same function in substantially the same way to obtain substantially the same result. In this sense it is therefore contemplated that an equivalent substitution of two or more elements may be made for any one of the elements described and its various embodiments or that a single element may be substituted for two or more elements in a claim.


Changes from the claimed subject matter as viewed by a person with ordinary skill in the art, now known or later devised, are expressly contemplated as being equivalents within the scope intended and its various embodiments. Therefore, obvious substitutions now or later known to one with ordinary skill in the art are defined to be within the scope of the defined elements. This disclosure is thus meant to be understood to include what is specifically illustrated and described above, what is conceptually equivalent, what can be obviously substituted, and also what incorporates the essential ideas.


The scope of this description is to be interpreted only in conjunction with the appended claims and it is made clear, here, that the named inventor believes that the claimed subject matter is what is intended to be patented.

Claims
  • 1. An intraocular lens for insertion into a capsular bag of an eye, the intraocular lens comprising: an optic;at least two plate haptics which are coupled to the optic and have a longitudinal axis, wherein each of the at least two plate haptics comprises a flexible body having a proximal portion adjacent to said optic and a distal portion remote from said optic, anda longitudinally rigid frame having a proximal portion and a distal portion, the proximal portion of the frame being closer to the optic than the distal portion of the frame,wherein the longitudinally rigid frame is embedded in and extends substantially the longitudinal length of said flexible body of each of said haptics which substantially reduces the longitudinal flexibility of said haptics while permitting flexibility in a transverse direction; andat least one projection extending laterally from the distal portion of the longitudinally rigid frame of at least one of said haptics and operable to engage with the capsular bag;wherein a proximal portion of a first one of the at least two plate haptics comprises at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles;wherein the longitudinally rigid frame extends into each of the at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles;wherein the at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles have ends that are spaced apart wider than the optic; andwherein the at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles, in combination, extend proximally to surround a substantial portion, but not all, of the optic.
  • 2. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the rigid frame of each of the at least two plate haptics is operable to restrict deformation of a proximal end of the plate haptic in which the rigid frame is embedded by a force exerted by the ciliary muscle of the eye.
  • 3. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein said frame comprises a plurality of substantially rigid, longitudinal frame segments arrayed in said haptics.
  • 4. The intraocular lens of claim 3, wherein the frame further comprises a transverse structure which connects said longitudinal frame segments.
  • 5. The intraocular lens of claim 3, wherein the plurality of substantially rigid, longitudinal frame segments comprises four substantially rigid, longitudinal frame segments.
  • 6. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the rigid frame is substantially comprised of at least one of: polyimide, PMMA, titanium and prolene.
  • 7. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein at least one of the haptics comprises proximal edges that are substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis.
  • 8. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the projection is a closed loop.
  • 9. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the projection is an open loop.
  • 10. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the projection is an extension of the distal portion of said frame of at least one of the plate haptics.
  • 11. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the frame is symmetric about the longitudinal axis.
  • 12. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the flexible body and the frame are made from different materials.
  • 13. The intraocular lens of claim 12, wherein the frame is made from at least one of: polyimide, prolene, PMMA and titanium.
  • 14. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein each of the haptics is at least as wide as the optic.
  • 15. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein each of said at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles is spaced apart laterally from said optic.
  • 16. The intraocular lens of claim 15, wherein each of said at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles, at a most proximal extent, has a free proximal end.
  • 17. The intraocular lens of claim 16, wherein the free proximal ends at the most proximal extent of each of the at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles are unconnected to one another.
  • 18. The intraocular lens of claim 16, wherein the free proximal ends at the most proximal extent of each of the at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles of the first one of the at least two plate haptics are not directly connected to another one of the at least two plate haptics.
  • 19. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein said frame extends from a distal portion of one of said haptics into a proximal portion of said one of said haptics.
  • 20. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles, in combination, extend proximally to circumferentially surround a substantial portion, but not all, of the optic.
  • 21. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the longitudinally rigid frame extends from a distal portion of the first one of the plate haptics into a proximal portion of said first one of the plate haptics, adjacent and lateral to the optic.
  • 22. The intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein each of the at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles of the first one of the at least two plate haptics is not directly connected to another one of the at least two plate haptics.
  • 23. An intraocular lens for insertion into a capsular bag of an eye, the intraocular lens comprising: an optic;at least two plate haptics which are coupled to the optic and have a longitudinal axis, wherein each of the at least two plate haptics comprises a flexible body having a proximal portion adjacent to said optic and a distal portion remote from said optic, anda longitudinally rigid frame having a proximal portion and a distal portion, the proximal portion of the frame being closer to the optic than the distal portion of the frame,wherein the longitudinally rigid frame is embedded in and extends substantially the longitudinal length of said flexible body of each of said haptics which substantially reduces the longitudinal flexibility of said haptics while permitting flexibility in a transverse direction; andat least one projection extending laterally from the distal portion of the longitudinally rigid frame of at least one of said haptics and operable to engage with the capsular bag;wherein a proximal portion of a first one of the at least two plate haptics comprises at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles;wherein the longitudinally rigid frame extends into each of the at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles; andwherein the at least one projection is a closed loop.
  • 24. An intraocular lens for insertion into a capsular bag of an eye, the intraocular lens comprising: an optic;at least two plate haptics which are coupled to the optic and have a longitudinal axis, wherein each of the at least two plate haptics comprises a flexible body having a proximal portion adjacent to said optic and a distal portion remote from said optic, anda longitudinally rigid frame having a proximal portion and a distal portion, the proximal portion of the frame being closer to the optic than the distal portion of the frame,wherein the longitudinally rigid frame is embedded in and extends substantially the longitudinal length of said flexible body of each of said haptics which substantially reduces the longitudinal flexibility of said haptics while permitting flexibility in a transverse direction; andat least one projection extending laterally from the distal portion of the longitudinally rigid frame of at least one of said haptics and operable to engage with the capsular bag;wherein a proximal portion of a first one of the at least two plate haptics comprises at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles;wherein the longitudinally rigid frame extends into each of the at least two laterally and proximally extending paddles; andwherein the at least one projection is an open loop.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 120, this application claims the benefit of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/398,107, filed on Jun. 21, 2010, 61/398,098 filed on Jun. 21, 2010, 61/398,115, filed on Jun. 21, 2010 and 61/398,099, filed Jun. 21, 2010, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (297)
Number Name Date Kind
2834023 Lieb May 1958 A
4073014 Poler Feb 1978 A
4118808 Poler Oct 1978 A
4122556 Poler Oct 1978 A
4159546 Shearing Jul 1979 A
4168547 Konstantinov et al. Sep 1979 A
4173798 Welsh Nov 1979 A
4174543 Kelman Nov 1979 A
4206518 Jardon et al. Jun 1980 A
4244060 Hoffer Jan 1981 A
4257521 Poler Mar 1981 A
4277851 Choyce et al. Jul 1981 A
4254509 Tennant Oct 1981 A
4298995 Poler Nov 1981 A
4304012 Richard Dec 1981 A
4409690 Gess Oct 1983 A
4409691 Levy Oct 1983 A
4424597 Schlegel Jan 1984 A
4441217 Cozean, Jr. Apr 1984 A
4477931 Kelman Oct 1984 A
4573998 Mazzocco Mar 1986 A
4585457 Kalb Apr 1986 A
4605411 Fedorov et al. Aug 1986 A
4615702 Koziol Oct 1986 A
4629462 Feaster Dec 1986 A
4648878 Kelman Mar 1987 A
4664665 Reuss et al. May 1987 A
4664666 Barrett May 1987 A
4666445 Tillay May 1987 A
4673406 Schlegel Jun 1987 A
4681102 Bartell Jul 1987 A
4704123 Smith Nov 1987 A
4710195 Glovinazzo Dec 1987 A
4718904 Thornton Jan 1988 A
4731078 Stoy Mar 1988 A
4737322 Bruns et al. Apr 1988 A
4738680 Herman Apr 1988 A
4743254 Davenport May 1988 A
4753655 Hecht Jun 1988 A
4759761 Portnoy Jul 1988 A
4763650 Hauser Aug 1988 A
4765329 Cumming et al. Aug 1988 A
4769033 Nordan Sep 1988 A
4769035 Kelman Sep 1988 A
4772283 White Sep 1988 A
4778463 Hetland Oct 1988 A
4781719 Kelman Nov 1988 A
4787904 Severin Nov 1988 A
4790847 Woods Dec 1988 A
4793344 Cumming et al. Dec 1988 A
4813955 Achatz et al. Mar 1989 A
4816030 Robinson Mar 1989 A
4840627 Blumenthal Jun 1989 A
4842599 Bronstein Jun 1989 A
4842601 Smith Jun 1989 A
4846833 Cumming Jul 1989 A
4862885 Cumming Sep 1989 A
4865601 Caldwell et al. Sep 1989 A
4868251 Reich et al. Sep 1989 A
4880427 Anis Nov 1989 A
4888012 Horn et al. Dec 1989 A
4892543 Turley Jan 1990 A
4919130 Stoy et al. Apr 1990 A
4932966 Christie et al. Jun 1990 A
4932968 Caldwell et al. Jun 1990 A
4932970 Portney Jun 1990 A
4936850 Barrett Jun 1990 A
4963148 Sulc et al. Oct 1990 A
4969897 Kalb Nov 1990 A
4976716 Cumming Dec 1990 A
4978354 Van Gent Dec 1990 A
4994082 Richards et al. Feb 1991 A
5047051 Cumming Sep 1991 A
5066297 Cumming Nov 1991 A
5078742 Dahan Jan 1992 A
5089022 Koester et al. Feb 1992 A
5139518 White Aug 1992 A
5141507 Paraekh Aug 1992 A
5152788 Isaacson et al. Oct 1992 A
5152789 Willis Oct 1992 A
5171319 Keates et al. Dec 1992 A
5171320 Nishi Dec 1992 A
5180390 Drews Jan 1993 A
5217490 Sayano et al. Jun 1993 A
5275604 Rheinish et al. Jan 1994 A
5275623 Sarfarazi Jan 1994 A
5275624 Hara et al. Jan 1994 A
5290310 Makower et al. Mar 1994 A
5304182 Rheinish et al. Apr 1994 A
5324306 Makower et al. Jun 1994 A
5326347 Cumming Jul 1994 A
5366502 Patel Nov 1994 A
5376115 Jansen Dec 1994 A
5425734 Blake Jun 1995 A
5443506 Garabet Aug 1995 A
5474562 Orchowski et al. Dec 1995 A
5476514 Cumming Dec 1995 A
5489302 Skottun Feb 1996 A
5496366 Cumming Mar 1996 A
5522891 Klaas Jun 1996 A
5562731 Cumming Oct 1996 A
5578042 Cumming Nov 1996 A
5578078 Nakajima et al. Nov 1996 A
5607472 Thompson Mar 1997 A
5611968 Grisoni et al. Mar 1997 A
5647865 Swinger Jul 1997 A
5674282 Cumming Oct 1997 A
5686414 Scannon Nov 1997 A
5699142 Lee et al. Dec 1997 A
5716403 Tran Feb 1998 A
5762836 Bos Jun 1998 A
5800532 Lieberman Sep 1998 A
5837156 Cumming Nov 1998 A
5843187 Bayers Dec 1998 A
5873879 Figueroa et al. Feb 1999 A
5919230 Sambursky Jul 1999 A
5944725 Cicenas et al. Aug 1999 A
5968094 Werblin et al. Oct 1999 A
5984914 Cumming Nov 1999 A
6007579 Lipshitz et al. Dec 1999 A
6013101 Israel Jan 2000 A
6015435 Valunin et al. Jan 2000 A
6027531 Tassignon Feb 2000 A
6051024 Cumming Apr 2000 A
6066171 Lipshitz et al. May 2000 A
6066172 Huo et al. May 2000 A
6113633 Portney Sep 2000 A
6129760 Fedorov et al. Oct 2000 A
6161544 DeVore Dec 2000 A
6164282 Gwon et al. Dec 2000 A
6176878 Gwon et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179870 Sourdille et al. Jan 2001 B1
6193750 Cumming Feb 2001 B1
6197058 Portney Mar 2001 B1
6197059 Cumming Mar 2001 B1
6217612 Woods Apr 2001 B1
6299641 Woods Oct 2001 B1
6302911 Hanna Oct 2001 B1
6322589 Cumming Nov 2001 B1
6342073 Cumming et al. Jan 2002 B1
6387126 Cumming May 2002 B1
6391056 Cumming May 2002 B2
6406494 Laguette et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409763 Brady Jun 2002 B1
6413276 Werblin Jul 2002 B1
6413277 Neuhann Jul 2002 B1
6419697 Kelman Jul 2002 B1
6423094 Sarfarazi Jul 2002 B1
6443985 Woods Sep 2002 B1
6451056 Cumming Sep 2002 B1
6461384 Hoffmann et al. Oct 2002 B1
6488708 Sarfarazi Dec 2002 B2
6494911 Cumming Dec 2002 B2
6497708 Cumming Dec 2002 B1
6503275 Cumming Jan 2003 B1
6503276 Lang et al. Jan 2003 B2
6517577 Callahan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524340 Israel Feb 2003 B2
6540353 Dunn Apr 2003 B1
6558420 Green May 2003 B2
6613343 Dillingham et al. Sep 2003 B2
6616691 Tran Sep 2003 B1
6616692 Glick et al. Sep 2003 B1
6638305 Laguette Oct 2003 B2
6638306 Cumming Oct 2003 B2
6645245 Preussner Nov 2003 B1
6660035 Lang et al. Dec 2003 B1
6660036 Cumming Dec 2003 B2
6685741 Landreville et al. Feb 2004 B2
6695881 Peng et al. Feb 2004 B2
6749634 Hanna Jun 2004 B2
6767363 Bandhauer et al. Jul 2004 B1
6849091 Cumming Feb 2005 B1
6858040 Nguyen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6881225 Okada Apr 2005 B2
6884263 Valyunin Apr 2005 B2
6921416 Khoury Jul 2005 B2
6926736 Peng Aug 2005 B2
6932839 Kamerling et al. Aug 2005 B1
6942695 Chapoy Sep 2005 B1
6969403 Peng Nov 2005 B2
6972033 McNicholas Dec 2005 B2
7018409 Glick Mar 2006 B2
7025783 Brady Apr 2006 B2
7037338 Nagamoto May 2006 B2
7048760 Cumming May 2006 B2
7097660 Portney Aug 2006 B2
7125422 Woods et al. Oct 2006 B2
7150759 Paul et al. Dec 2006 B2
7150760 Zhang Dec 2006 B2
7229475 Glazier Jun 2007 B2
7229476 Azar Jun 2007 B2
7300464 Tran Nov 2007 B2
7326246 Brady Feb 2008 B2
7341599 Peyman Mar 2008 B1
7435258 Blake Oct 2008 B2
7435259 Cumming Oct 2008 B2
7553327 Cumming Jun 2009 B2
7662180 Paul et al. Feb 2010 B2
7763070 Cumming Jul 2010 B2
7837730 Cumming Nov 2010 B2
7981155 Cumming Jul 2011 B2
7985253 Cumming Jul 2011 B2
8038711 Clarke Oct 2011 B2
8080056 Cumming Dec 2011 B2
8100965 Cumming et al. Jan 2012 B2
8109998 Cumming Feb 2012 B2
8163015 Cumming Apr 2012 B2
8216308 Blake et al. Jul 2012 B2
8388608 Kaluzna Mar 2013 B1
8523942 Cumming Sep 2013 B2
8734512 Cumming May 2014 B2
8764823 Cumming Jul 2014 B2
9034036 Cumming May 2015 B2
20010001836 Cumming May 2001 A1
20020120329 Lang et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020138140 Hanna Sep 2002 A1
20030060881 Glick et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030078658 Zadno-Azizi Apr 2003 A1
20030097177 Tran May 2003 A1
20030109925 Ghazizadeh et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135272 Brady et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030142269 Cumming Jul 2003 A1
20030171808 Phillips Sep 2003 A1
20030171809 Phillips Sep 2003 A1
20030187505 Liao Oct 2003 A1
20030199977 Cumming Oct 2003 A1
20030204257 Southard Oct 2003 A1
20040002757 Lai et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015236 Sarfarazi Jan 2004 A1
20040082993 Woods Apr 2004 A1
20040082994 Woods et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040111151 Paul Jun 2004 A1
20040111152 Kelman Jun 2004 A1
20040148023 Shu Jul 2004 A1
20040215207 Cumming Oct 2004 A1
20040215340 Messner Oct 2004 A1
20040220666 Cumming Nov 2004 A1
20040243232 Cumming Dec 2004 A1
20040249456 Cumming Dec 2004 A1
20050021140 Liao Jan 2005 A1
20050027354 Brady et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050075732 Israel Apr 2005 A1
20050096741 Cumming May 2005 A1
20050107875 Cumming May 2005 A1
20050125058 Cumming Jun 2005 A1
20050137703 Chen Jun 2005 A1
20050149184 Bogaert Jul 2005 A1
20050267576 Cumming Dec 2005 A1
20050288784 Peyman Dec 2005 A1
20060064077 Peyman Mar 2006 A1
20060064162 Klima Mar 2006 A1
20060100704 Blake et al. May 2006 A1
20060111776 Glick et al. May 2006 A1
20060116764 Simpson Jun 2006 A1
20060149369 Cumming et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060259140 Dell Nov 2006 A1
20070005136 Richardson Jan 2007 A1
20070012832 Ottens et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070032867 Cumming Feb 2007 A1
20070129800 Cumming Jun 2007 A1
20070129803 Cumming et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135915 Klima Jun 2007 A1
20070142908 Xu Jun 2007 A1
20070198084 Cumming et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070244472 Kuhn et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080027538 Cumming Jan 2008 A1
20080027539 Cumming Jan 2008 A1
20080027540 Cumming Jan 2008 A1
20080046077 Cumming Feb 2008 A1
20080086208 Nordan Apr 2008 A1
20080154362 Cumming Jun 2008 A1
20080188930 Mentak Aug 2008 A1
20080281415 Cumming Nov 2008 A1
20080281416 Cumming Nov 2008 A1
20080288066 Cumming Nov 2008 A1
20080294254 Cumming Nov 2008 A1
20080319545 Cumming Dec 2008 A1
20090005866 Cumming Jan 2009 A1
20090234449 De Juan, Jr. et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090248154 Dell Oct 2009 A1
20100004742 Cumming Jan 2010 A1
20100057202 Bogaert Mar 2010 A1
20110313524 Cumming Dec 2011 A1
20110313525 Cumming Dec 2011 A1
20120296424 Betser Nov 2012 A1
20120296425 Cumming Nov 2012 A1
20120310344 Cumming Dec 2012 A1
20130073039 Mirlay Mar 2013 A1
20130231742 Deacon et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140088699 Cumming Mar 2014 A1
20140094909 Cumming Apr 2014 A1
20140155871 Cumming Jun 2014 A1
20140172093 Cumming Jun 2014 A1
20150012088 Cumming Jan 2015 A1
20150073550 Cumming Mar 2015 A1
20150088254 Cumming Mar 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (20)
Number Date Country
2110184 Dec 1992 CA
681687 May 1993 CH
3626869 Feb 1988 DE
2728458 Jun 1996 FR
2728459 Jun 1996 FR
2734472 Nov 1996 FR
2765797 Jan 1999 FR
2991572 Dec 2013 FR
2171912 Sep 1986 GB
2226246 Jun 1990 GB
2003-190193 Jul 2003 JP
1123685 Nov 1984 SU
WO 9305733 Apr 1993 WO
WO 0119288 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0119289 Mar 2001 WO
WO 03017873 Mar 2003 WO
WO 2007037180 Apr 2007 WO
2008150890 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009048656 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009086511 Jul 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (49)
Entry
Dykstra, M., et al. Biological Electron Microscopy: Theory, Techniques, and Troublshooting, 2003, p. 81.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,359 dated Mar. 5, 2013 in 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/111,599 dated May 2, 2013 in 10 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/155,327 dated Dec. 10, 2012 in 10 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,605 dated Sep. 25, 2014 in 17 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US13/61452 dated Feb. 24, 2014 in 11 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,359 dated Oct. 25, 2012 in 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,359 dated Sep. 8, 2014 in 15 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/111,599 dated Jan. 2, 2013 in 11 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/111,599 dated Sep. 5, 2014 in 13 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/155,327 dated Jul. 20, 2012 in 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/155,327 dated Apr. 26, 2013 in 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,605 dated May 20, 2014 in 9 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/891,088 dated Aug. 13, 2014 in 25 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,076 dated Nov. 7, 2014 in 12 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,162 dated Aug. 4, 2014 in 18 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,933 dated Oct. 31, 2014 in 9 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,359 dated Jan. 31, 2013 in 8 pages.
Response to Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,359 dated Jul. 29, 2013 in 7 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/111,599 dated Apr. 9, 2013 in 6 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/111,599 dated Jul. 30, 2013 in 6 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/155,327 dated Oct. 26, 2012 in 5 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/155,327 dated Apr. 10, 2013 in 5 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/155,327 dated Jul. 25, 2013 in 5 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,605 dated Aug. 19, 2014 in 7 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/891,088 dated Dec. 15, 2014 in 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,359 dated Feb. 6, 2015 in 21 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/111,599 dated Feb. 6, 2015 in 21 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,612 dated Mar. 20, 2015 in 14 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,933 dated Mar. 19, 2015 in 23 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/057037 dated Jan. 20, 2015 in 12 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/270,166 dated Mar. 3, 2015 in 19 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/274,352 dated Feb. 12, 2015 in 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,813 dated Mar. 26, 2015 in 16 pages.
Response to Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,359 dated Jan. 8, 2015 in 9 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/111,599 dated Jan. 6, 2015 in 13 pages.
Response to Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/953,605 dated Dec. 18, 2014 in 12 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,076 dated Feb. 9, 2015 in 10 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,612 dated Jan. 5, 2015 in 8 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,933 dated Feb. 2, 2015 in 10 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/274,352 dated Jun. 8, 2015 in 27 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,359 dated Jun. 5, 2015 in 11 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,076 dated Apr. 10, 2015 in 26 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,821 dated Apr. 13, 2015 in 33 pages.
Response to Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,359 dated May 6, 2015 in 9 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/111,599 dated Jun. 8, 2015 in 13 pages.
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/274,352 dated May 12, 2015 in 10 pages.
Internet Archive Wayback Machine; Crystalens—Is Crystalens right for you?; downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/20141025080709/http://crystalens.com/en-us/iscrystalensrightforyou.aspx (Archived Oct. 25, 2014; printed on Aug. 12, 2015).
Davison, J.A., Chapter 11: Intraocular Lenses, Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology on CD-ROM, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005, vol. 6, pp. 1-46.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110313519 A1 Dec 2011 US
Provisional Applications (4)
Number Date Country
61398107 Jun 2010 US
61398098 Jun 2010 US
61398115 Jun 2010 US
61398099 Jun 2010 US