1. Field of the Invention
Certain disclosed embodiments relate to intraocular lenses and, more particularly, to intraocular lenses that alter their refractive power in response to action of the ciliary muscle of the eye.
2. Description of the Related Art
The vast majority of cataract operations involve the implantation of an artificial lens following cataract removal. Typically these lenses have a fixed focal length or, in the case of bifocal or multifocal lenses, have several different fixed focal lengths. Such fixed focal-length lenses lack the ability of the natural lens to dynamically change the refractive power of the eye. Certain embodiments of the intraocular lens disclosed herein provide an accommodating lens system which alters its refractive power in response to action of the ciliary muscle, thereby allowing the lens system to bring into focus on the retina images of objects that are both near and far from the eye.
One aspect of the invention is an accommodating intraocular lens. An anterior portion has an anterior viewing element and an anterior biasing element connected to the anterior viewing element. A posterior portion has a posterior viewing element and a posterior biasing element connected to the posterior viewing element. The anterior and posterior biasing elements are connected at first and second apices. First and second distending members are connected to the posterior portion. Each of the distending members extends to a location significantly anterior of an anterior side of the posterior viewing element. The anterior and posterior portions are connected only at said first and second apices.
Another aspect of the invention is an accommodating intraocular lens. An anterior portion has an anterior viewing element and an anterior biasing element connected to the anterior viewing element. A posterior portion has a posterior viewing element and a posterior biasing element connected to the posterior viewing element. The anterior and posterior biasing elements are connected at first and second apices. First and second distending members are connected to the posterior portion. First and second distending members extend to first and second anterior locations, respectively. Each of the first and second anterior locations is significantly anterior of an anterior side of the posterior viewing element. Each of the first and second anterior locations is spaced from all of the apices.
All of these aspects are intended to be within the scope of the invention herein disclosed. These and other aspects of the invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments having reference to the attached figures, the invention not being limited to any particular preferred embodiment(s) disclosed.
Having thus summarized the general nature of the invention, certain preferred embodiments and modifications thereof will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the detailed description herein having reference to the figures that follow, of which:
As light enters the eye 50, the cornea 52 and the lens 56 cooperate to focus the incoming light and form an image on the retina 64 at the rear of the eye, thus facilitating vision. In the process known as accommodation, the shape of the lens 56 is altered (and its refractive properties thereby adjusted) to allow the eye 50 to focus on objects at varying distances. A typical healthy eye has sufficient accommodation to enable focused vision of objects ranging in distance from infinity (generally defined as over 20 feet from the eye) to very near (closer than 10 inches).
The lens 56 has a natural elasticity, and in its relaxed state assumes a shape that in cross-section resembles a football. Accommodation occurs when the ciliary muscle 60 moves the lens from its relaxed or “unaccommodated” state (shown in
This system of axes is depicted purely to facilitate description herein; thus, it is not intended to limit the possible orientations which the lens system 100 may assume during use. For example, the lens system 100 may rotate about, or may be displaced along, the optical axis during use without detracting from the performance of the lens. It is clear that, should the lens system 100 be so rotated about the optical axis, the transverse axis may no longer have an upper-lower orientation and the lateral axis may no longer have a left-right orientation, but the lens system 100 will continue to function as it would when oriented as depicted in
As best seen in
As best seen in
In the embodiment shown in
Preferably, both the anterior viewing element 106 and the posterior viewing element 118 comprise an optic or lens having refractive power. (As used herein, the term “refractive” or “refractive power” shall include “diffractive” or “diffractive power”.) Some preferred power ranges for the optics are discussed in detail below. In alternative embodiments one or both of the anterior and posterior viewing elements 106, 118 may comprise an optic with a surrounding or partially surrounding perimeter frame member or members, with some or all of the biasing elements/translation members attached to the frame member(s). As a further alternative, one of the viewing elements 106, 118 may comprise a perimeter frame with an open/empty central portion or void located on the optical axis, or a perimeter frame member or members with a zero-power lens or transparent member therein. In still further variations, one of the viewing elements 106, 118 may comprise only a zero-power lens or transparent member.
In one embodiment (see
In one embodiment (see
The anterior and posterior biasing elements 108, 120 function in a springlike manner to permit the anterior viewing element 106 and posterior viewing element 118 to move relative to each other generally along the optical axis. The biasing elements 108, 120 bias the viewing elements 106, 118 apart so that the elements 106, 108 separate to the accommodated position or accommodated state shown in
When the lens system 100 is implanted in the capsular bag 58 (
The entire lens system 100, other than the optic(s), thus comprises an articulated frame whose functions include holding the optic(s) in position within the capsular bag and guiding and causing movement of the optic(s) between the accommodated and unaccommodated positions.
Advantageously, the entire lens system 100 may comprise a single piece of material, i.e. one that is formed without need to assemble two or more components by gluing, heat bonding, the use of fasteners or interlocking elements, etc. This characteristic increases the reliability of the lens system 100 by improving its resistance to material fatigue effects which can arise as the lens system experiences millions of accommodation cycles throughout its service life. It will be readily appreciated that the molding process and mold tooling discussed herein, lend themselves to the molding of lens systems 100 that comprise a single piece of material. However, any other suitable technique may be employed to manufacture single-piece lens systems.
In those embodiments where the optic(s) are installed into annular or other perimeter frame member(s) (see discussion below), the articulated frame may comprise a single piece of material, to obtain the performance advantages discussed above. It is believed that the assembly of the optic(s) to the articulated frame will not substantially detract from the achievement of these advantages.
The lens system 100 has sufficient dynamic range that the anterior and posterior viewing elements 106, 118 move about 0.5-4 mm, preferably about 1-3 mm, more preferably about 1-2 mm, and most preferably about 1.5 mm closer together when the lens system 100 moves from the accommodated state to the unaccommodated state. In other words the separation distance X (see
As may be best seen in
However the connection is established between the first and second anterior translation members 110, 114 and the anterior viewing element 106, it is preferred that the attachment locations 142, 144 corresponding to the first anterior translation member 110 be farther away from the first apex 112 than is the closest edge or the periphery of the anterior viewing element 106. This configuration increases the effective length of the first anterior translation member 110/arms 110a, 110b, in comparison to a direct or straight attachment between the apex 112 and the nearest/top edge of the anterior viewing element 106. For the same reasons, it is preferred that the attachment locations 146, 148 associated with the second anterior translation member 114 be farther away from the second apex 116 than is the closest/bottom edge of the anterior viewing element 106.
As best seen in
By increasing the effective length of some or all of the translation members 110, 114, 122, 124 (and that of the arms 110a, 110b, 114a, 114b, 122a, 122b, 124a, 124b where such structure is employed), one preferred configuration of the attachment locations 142, 144, 146, 148, 150, 152, 154, 156 relative to the first and second apices 112, 116 enables the anterior and/or posterior viewing elements 106, 118 to move with respect to one another a greater distance along the optical axis, for a given angular displacement of the anterior and/or posterior translation members. This arrangement thus facilitates a more responsive spring system for the lens system 100 and minimizes material fatigue effects associated with prolonged exposure to repeated flexing.
In the illustrated embodiment, the attachment location 142 of the first anterior translation member 110 is spaced from the corresponding attachment location 146 of the second anterior translation member 114 along the periphery of the anterior viewing element, and the same relationship exists between the other pairs of attachment locations 144, 148; 150, 154; and 152, 156. This arrangement advantageously broadens the support base for the anterior and posterior viewing elements 106, 118 and prevents them from twisting about an axis parallel to the lateral axis, as the viewing elements move between the accommodated and unaccommodated positions.
It is also preferred that the attachment locations 142, 144 of the first anterior translation member 110 be located equidistant from the first apex 112, and that the right and left arms 110a, 110b of the member 110 be equal in length. Furthermore, the arrangement of the attachment locations 146, 148, arms 114a, 114b and second apex preferably mirrors that recited above regarding the first anterior translation member 110, while the apices 112, 116 are preferably equidistant from the optical axis and are situated 180 degrees apart. This configuration maintains the anterior viewing element 106 orthogonal to the optical axis as the viewing element 106 moves back and forth and the anterior viewing element flexes.
For the same reasons, a like combination of equidistance and equal length is preferred for the first and second posterior translation members 122, 124 and their constituent arms 122a, 122b, 124a, 124b and attachment points 150, 152, 154, 156, with respect to the apices 112, 116. However, as shown the arms 122a, 122b, 124a, 124b need not be equal in length to their counterparts 110a, 110b, 114a, 114b in the first and second anterior translation members 110, 114.
Where any member or element connects to the periphery of the anterior or posterior viewing elements 106, 118, the member defines a connection geometry or attachment area with a connection width W and a connection thickness T (see
A number of suitable cross-sectional configurations may be used along some or all of the length of the translation members and/or arms 110a, 110b, 114a, 114b, 122a, 122b, 124a, 124b. The shape preferably is defined by a relatively broad and flat or slightly curved outer surface. It is intended that when in use the outer surface faces away from the interior of the lens system and/or toward the capsular bag 58. The remaining surfaces, proportions and dimensions making up the cross-sectional shape can vary widely but may advantageously be selected to facilitate manufacture of the lens system 100 via molding or casting techniques while minimizing stresses in the arms during use of the lens system.
It is further contemplated that the dimensions, shapes, and/or proportions of the cross-sectional configuration of the translation members and/or arms 110a, 110b, 114a, 114b, 122a, 122b, 124a, 124b may vary along the length of the members/arms. This may be done in order to, for example, add strength to high-stress regions of the arms, fine-tune their spring characteristics, add rigidity or flexibility, etc.
As discussed above, each of the anterior viewing element 106 and the posterior viewing element 118 preferably comprises an optic having refractive power. In one preferred embodiment, the anterior viewing element 106 comprises a biconvex lens having positive refractive power and the posterior viewing element 118 comprises a convexo-concave lens having negative refractive power. The anterior viewing element 106 may comprise a lens having a positive power advantageously less than 55 diopters, preferably less than 40 diopters, more preferably less than 35 diopters, and most preferably less than 30 diopters. The posterior viewing element 118 may comprise a lens having a power which is advantageously between −25 and 0 diopters, and preferably between −25 and −15 diopters. In other embodiments, the posterior viewing element 118 comprises a lens having a power which is between −15 and 0 diopters, preferably between −13 and −2 diopters, and most preferably between −10 and −5 diopters. Advantageously, the total power of the optic(s) employed in the lens system 100 is about 5-35 diopters; preferably, the total power is about 10-30 diopters; most preferably, the total power is about 15-25 diopters. (As used herein, the term “diopter” refers to lens or system power as measured when the lens system 100 has been implanted in the human eye in the usual manner.) It should be noted that if materials having a high index of refraction (e.g., higher than that of silicone) are used, the optics may be made thinner which facilitates a wider range of motion for the optics. This in turn allows the use of lower-power optics than those specified above. In addition, higher-index materials allow the manufacture of a higher-power lens for a given lens thickness and thereby reduce the range of motion needed to achieve a given range of accommodation.
Some lens powers and radii of curvature presently preferred for use with an embodiment of the lens system 100 with optic(s) having a refractive index of about 1.432 are as follows: a +31 diopter, biconvex lens with an anterior radius of curvature of 5.944 mm and a posterior radius of curvature of 5.944 mm; a +28 diopter, biconvex lens with an anterior radius of curvature of 5.656 mm and a posterior radius of curvature of 7.788 mm; a +24 diopter, biconvex lens with an anterior radius of curvature of 6.961 mm and a posterior radius of curvature of 8.5 mm; a −10 diopter, biconcave lens with an anterior radius of curvature of 18.765 mm and a posterior radius of curvature of 18.765 mm, a −8 diopter, concavo-convex lens with an anterior radius of curvature of between 9 mm and 9.534 mm and a posterior radius of curvature of 40 mm, and a −5 diopter, concavo-convex lens with an anterior radius of curvature of between 9 mm and 9.534 mm and a posterior radius of curvature of 20 mm. In one embodiment, the anterior viewing element comprises the +31 diopter lens described above and the posterior viewing element comprises the −10 diopter lens described above. In another embodiment, the anterior viewing element comprises the +28 diopter lens described above and the posterior viewing element comprises the −8 diopter lens described above. In another embodiment, the anterior viewing element comprises the +24 diopter lens described above and the posterior viewing element comprises the −5 diopter lens described above.
The combinations of lens powers and radii of curvature specified herein advantageously minimize image magnification. However, other designs and radii of curvature provide modified magnification when desirable.
The lenses of the anterior viewing element 106 and the posterior viewing element 118 are relatively moveable as discussed above; advantageously, this movement is sufficient to produce an accommodation of at least one diopter, preferably at least two diopters and most preferably at least three diopters. In other words, the movement of the optics relative to each other and/or to the cornea is sufficient to create a difference between (i) the refractive power of the user's eye in the accommodated state and (ii) the refractive power of the user's eye in the unaccommodated state, having a magnitude expressed in diopters as specified above. Where the lens system 100 has a single optic, the movement of the optic relative to the cornea is sufficient to create a difference in focal power as specified above.
Advantageously, the lens system 100 can be customized for an individual patient's needs by shaping or adjusting only one of the four lens faces, and thereby altering the overall optical characteristics of the system 100. This in turn facilitates easy manufacture and maintenance of an inventory of lens systems with lens powers which will fit a large population of patients, without necessitating complex adjustment procedures at the time of implantation. It is contemplated that all of the lens systems in the inventory have a standard combination of lens powers, and that a system is fitted to a particular patient by simply shaping only a designated “variable” lens face. This custom-shaping procedure can be performed to-order at a central manufacturing facility or laboratory, or by a physician consulting with an individual patient. In one embodiment, the anterior face of the anterior viewing element is the designated sole variable lens face. In another embodiment, the anterior face of the posterior viewing element is the only variable face. However, any of the lens faces is suitable for such designation. The result is minimal inventory burden with respect to lens power (all of the lens systems in stock have the same lens powers) without requiring complex adjustment for individual patients (only one of the four lens faces is adjusted in the fitting process).
Furthermore, the distending members 134, 136 reshape the capsular bag 58 into a taller, thinner configuration along its range of accommodation to provide a wider range of relative motion of the viewing elements 106, 118. When the capsular bag 58 is in the unaccommodated state, the distending members 134, 136 force the capsular bag into a thinner configuration (as measured along the optical axis) in comparison to the unaccommodated configuration of the capsular bag 58 with the natural lens in place. Preferably, the distending members 134, 136 cause the capsular bag 58 to take on a shape in the unaccommodated state which is about 1.0-2.0 mm thinner, more preferably about 1.5 mm thinner, along the optical axis than it is with the natural lens in place and in the unaccommodated state.
With such a thin “starting point” provided by the distending members 134, 136, the viewing elements 106, 118 of the lens system can move a greater distance apart, and provide a greater range of accommodation, without causing undesirable contact between the lens system and the iris. Accordingly, by reshaping the bag as discussed above the distending members 134, 136 facilitate a range of relative motion of the anterior and posterior viewing elements 106, 118 of about 0.5-4 mm, preferably about 1-3 mm, more preferably about 1-2 mm, and most preferably about 1.5 mm.
The distending portion 132/distending members 134, 136 are preferably separate from the anterior and posterior biasing elements 108, 120; the distending members 134, 136 thus preferably play no part in biasing the anterior and posterior viewing elements 106, 118 apart toward the accommodated position. This arrangement is advantageous because the apices 112, 116 of the biasing elements 108, 120 reach their point of minimum protrusion from the optical axis (and thus the biasing elements reach their minimum potential effectiveness for radially distending the capsular bag) when the lens system 100 is in the accommodated state (see
The distending portion 132/distending members 134, 136 advantageously reshape the capsular bag 58 by stretching the bag 58 radially away from the optical axis and causing the bag 58 to take on a thinner, taller shape throughout the range of accommodation by the eye. This reshaping is believed to facilitate a broad (as specified above) range of relative motion for the viewing elements of the lens system 100, with appropriate endpoints (derived from the total system thicknesses detailed above) to avoid the need for unacceptably thick optic(s) in the lens system.
If desired, the distending members 134, 136 may also function as haptics to stabilize and fixate the orientation of the lens system 100 within the capsular bag. The openings 134c, 136c of preferred distending members 134,136 permit cellular ingrowth from the capsular bag upon positioning of the lens system 100 therein. Finally, other methodologies, such as a separate capsular tension ring or the use of adhesives to glue the capsular bag together in selected regions, may be used instead of or in addition to the distending portion 132, to reduce “slack” in the capsular bag.
A tension ring can also act as a physical barrier to cell growth on the inner surface of the capsular bag, and thus can provide additional benefits in limiting posterior capsule opacification, by preventing cellular growth from advancing posteriorly on the inner surface of the bag. When implanted, the tension ring firmly contacts the inner surface of the bag and defines a circumferential barrier against cell growth on the inner surface from one side of the barrier to another.
As best seen in
If desired, one or both of the retention members 128, 130 may have an opening 129 formed therein to permit fluid flow as discussed above.
The retention members 128, 130 and the transition members 138, 140 also prevent contact between the iris and the anterior viewing element 106, by separating the anterior opening 66 from the anterior face of the viewing element 106. In other words, the retention members 128, 130 and the transition members 138, 140 displace the anterior aspect of the capsular bag 58, including the anterior opening 66, anteriorly from the anterior viewing element 106, and maintain this separation throughout the range of accommodation of the lens system. Thus, if contact occurs between the iris and the lens system-capsular bag assembly, no part of the lens system will touch the iris, only the capsular bag itself, in particular those portions of the bag 58 overlying the retention members 128, 130 and/or the transition members 138, 140. The retention members 128, 130 and/or the transition members 138, 140 therefore maintain a separation between the iris and the lens system, which can be clinically adverse if the contacting portion(s) of the lens system are constructed from silicone.
As depicted in
The stop members 190 shown in
In other embodiments all of the contact surfaces 191 of the posts 190a and tabs 190b may be configured to contact their respective opposing surfaces when the viewing elements 106, 118 are at the minimum separation distance SD. In still further embodiments, the contact surfaces 191 of the tabs 190b may be configured to contact the opposing surfaces when the viewing elements 106, 118 are at the minimum separation distance SD and the contact surfaces 191 of the posts 190a configured to contact the opposing surfaces only if the viewing elements 106, 118 are urged together beyond the minimum separation distance SD. In one embodiment, the minimum separation distance SD is about 0.1-1.0 mm; in another embodiment the minimum separation distance SD is about 0.5 mm.
When one of the contact surfaces abuts one of the opposing surfaces, the two surfaces define a contact area CA (see
Other design features of the stop members 190 can be selected to maximize their ability to prevent adhesion of the contact surface(s) to the corresponding opposing surface(s), or adhesion to each other of any part of the anterior and posterior portions 102, 104 of the lens system 100. For example, the contact and opposing surfaces may be formed from dissimilar materials to reduce the effect of any self-adhesive materials employed in forming the lens system 100. In addition the shape and/or material employed in constructing one or more of the stop members 190 can be selected to impart a spring-like quality to the stop member(s) in question, so that when the stop member is loaded in compression as the viewing elements are urged together at the minimum separation distance, the stop member tends to exert a resisting spring force, due to either bending or axial compression (or both) of the stop member, which in turn derive from the elasticity of the material(s) from which the stop member is constructed, or the shape of the stop member, or both. This springlike quality is particularly effective for inhibiting adhesion of areas of the anterior and posterior portions 102, 104 other than the contact surface(s) and opposing surface(s).
As used herein, the term “adhesion” refers to attachment to each other of (i) an area of the anterior portion 102 of the lens system 100 and (ii) a corresponding area of the posterior portion 104 (other than the apices 112, 116), wherein such attachment is sufficiently strong to prevent, other than momentarily, the anterior and posterior viewing elements 106, 118 from moving apart along the optical axis under the biasing force of the anterior and/or posterior biasing elements 108, 120. If the areas in question are formed of different materials, adhesion may occur where at least one of the materials has an adhesive affinity for the other material. If the areas in question are formed of the same material, adhesion may occur where the material has an adhesive affinity for itself.
In the embodiment shown, four posts 190a are positioned near the perimeter of the anterior viewing element 106, equally angularly spaced around the optical axis. In addition, two tabs 190b are located on either side of the anterior viewing element, midway between the apices 112, 116 of the lens system. Naturally, the number, type and/or position of the stop members 190 can be varied while preserving the advantageous function of maintaining separation between the anterior and posterior portions of the lens system.
The illustrated embodiment employs stop members 190 which extend posteriorly from the anterior portion 102 of the lens system 100, so that the contact surfaces 191 are located on the posterior extremities of the stop members 190 and are configured to abut opposing surfaces formed on the posterior portion 104 of the lens system 100. However, it will be appreciated that some or all of the stop members 190 may extend anteriorly from the posterior portion 104 of the lens system 100, so that their contact surfaces 191 are located on the anterior extremities of the stop members 190 and are configured to abut opposing surfaces formed on the anterior portion 102 of the lens system 100.
Additional features and embodiments of lens systems are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/020,853 (filed Dec. 11, 2001) and Ser. No. 10/207,708 (filed Jul. 25, 2002), which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
In the illustrated embodiment, the distance 202 between the free end 128b of the first retention member 128 and the free end 130b of the second retention member 130 preferably is between about 6 mm and about 8 mm. In one embodiment, the distance 202 preferably is between about 6.9 mm and about 7.3 mm.
In the illustrated embodiment, the distance 204 between the free end 134b of the first distending member 134 and the free end 136b of the second distending member 136 preferably is between about 8 mm and about 14 mm. In one embodiment, the distance 204 preferably is between about 9 mm and about 11 mm. In one embodiment, the distance 204 preferably is between about 9.7 mm and about 9.9 mm.
As shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the distance 302 between the free end 128b of the first retention member 128 and the free end 130b of the second retention member 130 preferably is between about 6 mm and about 8 mm. In one embodiment, the distance 302 preferably is between about 6.9 mm and about 7.3 mm.
In the illustrated embodiment, the distance 304 between the free end 134b of the first distending member 134 and the free end 136b of the second distending member 136 preferably is between about 8 mm and about 14 mm. In one embodiment, the distance 304 preferably is between about 9 mm and about 11 mm. In one embodiment, the distance 304 preferably is between about 9.7 mm and about 9.9 mm.
As shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the distance 402 between the free end 128b of the first retention member 128 and the free end 130b of the second retention member 130 preferably is between about 6 mm and about 8 mm. In one embodiment, the distance 402 preferably is between about 6.9 mm and about 7.3 mm.
As best shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the distance 404 between the free end 134b of the first distending member 134 and the free end 136b of the second distending member 136 preferably is between about 8 mm and about 14 mm. In one embodiment, the distance 404 preferably is between about 9 mm and about 11 mm. In one embodiment, the distance 404 preferably is between about 9.7 mm and about 9.9 mm.
As shown in
In one embodiment, at least one of the first and second distending members 134, 136 connected to the posterior portion 104 of the lens system 400 extends to a location 420 significantly anterior of an anterior surface 424 of the posterior viewing element 118. Preferably, first and second distending members 134, 136 are connected to the posterior portion 104 extend to first and second anterior locations 420, 422, respectively. Each of the first and second anterior locations 420, 422 is significantly anterior of the anterior surface 424 of the posterior viewing element 118.
As discussed previously, anterior and posterior biasing elements 108, 120 can be connected at first and second apices 112, 116. In one embodiment, each of the first and second anterior locations 420, 422 is spaced from the first and second apices 112, 116. In some embodiments, one or more of the distending members 134, 136 extends substantially to or beyond a plane 430 that passes through the apices 112, 116 and is oriented perpendicular to the optical axis. Preferably, one, both or all of the first and second anterior locations 420, 422 resides substantially at or anterior of a plane 430 that passes through the apices 112, 116 and is oriented perpendicular to the optical axis. In one embodiment, the first anterior location 420 comprises an anteriormost portion 424 of the first distending member 134, and the second anterior location 422 comprises an anteriormost portion 426 of the second distending member 136.
The lens system 400 is shown situated in the capsular bag 58 in the customary manner with the anterior viewing element 106 and posterior viewing element 118 arranged along the optical axis. The capsular bag 58 is shown with a generally circular anterior opening 66 which may often be cut into the capsular bag during installation of the lens system 400. The first and second distending members 134, 136 of the distending portion 132 distend the capsular bag 58 so that intimate contact is created between the capsular bag 58 and the posterior face of the posterior viewing element and/or the posterior biasing element 120. In addition, intimate contact is facilitated between the capsular bag 58 and the anterior face of the anterior viewing element 106 and/or anterior biasing element 108. The distending members 134, 136 thus remove slack from the capsular bag 58 and ensure optimum force coupling between the bag 58 and the lens system 400 as the bag 58 is alternately stretched and released by the action of the ciliary muscle.
The distending members 134, 136 preferably position or locate the lens system 400 in a desired orientation within the capsular bag. In one embodiment, the posterior viewing element 118 preferably is positioned in a posterior portion of the capsular bag 58. Typically, the capsular bag 58 has an apex 70 formed along an equator 72 of the capsular bag 58. The distending members 134, 136 preferably extend into the apex 70 to position the lens system 400. For example, the distending members 134, 136 preferably center the lens system 400 within the capsular bag 58 along the lateral axis. Additionally, in one embodiment, the distending members 134, 136 extend into the apex 70 of the capsular bag 58 and position the posterior viewing element 118 in a posterior portion of the capsular bag 58. In some embodiments, positioning the posterior viewing element 118 further posterior in the capsular bag 58 provides for a greater range of motion in response to the natural accommodation processes of the eye. With reference to
As best seen in
Additionally, in the illustrated embodiment, openings 416, 418 are provided in the retention members 128, 130, and/or in the transition members 138, 140 to permit fluid to flow between the interior of the capsular bag 58 and the portions of the eye anterior of the bag 58. The sizes, configurations, and positions of the openings 416, 418 preferably are selected to allow adequate flow between the interior of the capsular bag 58 and the portions of the eye anterior of the bag 58. As noted above, if the anterior portion 102 of the lens system 400 seals the anterior opening 66 of the bag 58, the resulting prevention of fluid flow can cause the aqueous humor in the capsular bag to stagnate, leading to a clinically adverse event, and can inhibit the movement of the lens system 400 between the accommodated and unaccommodated states.
Although the function of the distending portion 132 and retention portion 126 are described with reference to lens system 400, other embodiments, such as for example, lens system 200 and lens system 300, preferably can function in a similar manner.
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/861,732, filed on Aug. 23, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/958,871, filed on Oct. 5, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,780,729, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/563,238, filed on Apr. 16, 2004. The entire contents of each of the above-identified applications are hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1483509 | Bugbee | Feb 1924 | A |
2129305 | Feinbloom | Sep 1938 | A |
2274142 | Houchin | Feb 1942 | A |
2405989 | Beach | Aug 1946 | A |
2511517 | Spiegel | Jun 1950 | A |
3031927 | Wesley | May 1962 | A |
3034403 | Neefe | May 1962 | A |
RE25286 | de Carte | Nov 1962 | E |
3210894 | Bentley et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3222432 | Grandperret | Dec 1965 | A |
3227507 | Feinbloom | Jan 1966 | A |
3339997 | Wesley | Sep 1967 | A |
3420006 | Barnett | Jan 1969 | A |
3431327 | Tsuetaki | Mar 1969 | A |
3482906 | Volk | Dec 1969 | A |
3542461 | Girard et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3693301 | Lemaitre | Sep 1972 | A |
3760045 | Thiele et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3922728 | Krasnov | Dec 1975 | A |
3932148 | Krewalk, Sr. | Jan 1976 | A |
4055378 | Feneberg | Oct 1977 | A |
4062629 | Winthrop | Dec 1977 | A |
4162122 | Cohen | Jul 1979 | A |
4195919 | Shelton | Apr 1980 | A |
4199231 | Evans | Apr 1980 | A |
4210391 | Cohen | Jul 1980 | A |
4240163 | Galin | Dec 1980 | A |
4240719 | Guilino et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4253199 | Banko | Mar 1981 | A |
4254509 | Tennant | Mar 1981 | A |
4274717 | Davenport | Jun 1981 | A |
4307945 | Kitchen et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4315673 | Guilino et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4316293 | Bayers | Feb 1982 | A |
4338005 | Cohen | Jul 1982 | A |
4340283 | Cohen | Jul 1982 | A |
4370760 | Kelman | Feb 1983 | A |
4377329 | Poler | Mar 1983 | A |
4402579 | Poler | Sep 1983 | A |
4404694 | Kelman | Sep 1983 | A |
4409691 | Levy | Oct 1983 | A |
4418991 | Breger | Dec 1983 | A |
4426741 | Bittner | Jan 1984 | A |
4476591 | Arnott | Oct 1984 | A |
4504982 | Burk | Mar 1985 | A |
4551864 | Akhavi | Nov 1985 | A |
4560383 | Leiske | Dec 1985 | A |
4573775 | Bayshort | Mar 1986 | A |
4580882 | Nuchman et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4596578 | Kelman | Jun 1986 | A |
4618228 | Baron et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4618229 | Jacobstein et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4636049 | Blaker | Jan 1987 | A |
4636210 | Hoffer | Jan 1987 | A |
4636211 | Nielsen et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4637697 | Freeman | Jan 1987 | A |
4641934 | Freeman | Feb 1987 | A |
4655770 | Gupta et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4666445 | Tillay | May 1987 | A |
4676792 | Praeger | Jun 1987 | A |
4687484 | Kaplan | Aug 1987 | A |
4693572 | Tsuetaki et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
RE32525 | Pannu | Oct 1987 | E |
4702244 | Mazzocco | Oct 1987 | A |
4704016 | de Carle | Nov 1987 | A |
4720286 | Bailey et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4725278 | Shearing | Feb 1988 | A |
4731078 | Stoy et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4752123 | Blaker | Jun 1988 | A |
4759762 | Grendahl | Jul 1988 | A |
4769033 | Nordan | Sep 1988 | A |
4780154 | Mori et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4790847 | Woods | Dec 1988 | A |
4813955 | Achatz et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4830481 | Futhey et al. | May 1989 | A |
4842601 | Smith | Jun 1989 | A |
4881804 | Cohen | Nov 1989 | A |
4883485 | Patel | Nov 1989 | A |
4888012 | Horn et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4888015 | Domino | Dec 1989 | A |
4890912 | Visser | Jan 1990 | A |
4890913 | De Carle | Jan 1990 | A |
4892543 | Turley | Jan 1990 | A |
4898461 | Portney | Feb 1990 | A |
4902293 | Feaster | Feb 1990 | A |
4906246 | Grendahl | Mar 1990 | A |
4917681 | Nordan | Apr 1990 | A |
4919663 | Grendahl | Apr 1990 | A |
4921496 | Grendahl | May 1990 | A |
4923296 | Erickson | May 1990 | A |
4929289 | Moriya et al. | May 1990 | A |
4932966 | Christie et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4932968 | Caldwell et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4932971 | Kelman | Jun 1990 | A |
4938583 | Miller | Jul 1990 | A |
4946469 | Sarfarazi | Aug 1990 | A |
4955902 | Kelman | Sep 1990 | A |
4963148 | Sulc et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4976534 | Miege et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4976732 | Vorosmarthy | Dec 1990 | A |
4990159 | Kraff | Feb 1991 | A |
4994082 | Richards et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994083 | Sulc et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5000559 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002382 | Seidner | Mar 1991 | A |
5019098 | Mercier | May 1991 | A |
5019099 | Nordan | May 1991 | A |
5047052 | Dubroff | Sep 1991 | A |
5071432 | Baikoff | Dec 1991 | A |
5089024 | Christie et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5096285 | Silberman | Mar 1992 | A |
5112351 | Christie et al. | May 1992 | A |
5147397 | Christ et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152788 | Isaacson et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5152789 | Willis | Oct 1992 | A |
5158572 | Nielsen | Oct 1992 | A |
5166711 | Portney | Nov 1992 | A |
5166712 | Portney | Nov 1992 | A |
5171266 | Wiley et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171320 | Nishi | Dec 1992 | A |
5173723 | Volk | Dec 1992 | A |
5192317 | Kalb | Mar 1993 | A |
5192318 | Schneider | Mar 1993 | A |
5201762 | Hauber | Apr 1993 | A |
5225858 | Portney | Jul 1993 | A |
5258025 | Fedorov et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5260727 | Oksman et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270744 | Portney | Dec 1993 | A |
5275623 | Sarfarazi | Jan 1994 | A |
5326347 | Cumming | Jul 1994 | A |
5354335 | Lipshitz et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358520 | Patel | Oct 1994 | A |
5391202 | Lipshitz et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
RE34998 | Langerman | Jul 1995 | E |
5443506 | Garabet | Aug 1995 | A |
5476514 | Cumming | Dec 1995 | A |
5480428 | Fedorov et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489302 | Skottun | Feb 1996 | A |
5496366 | Cumming | Mar 1996 | A |
5503165 | Schachar | Apr 1996 | A |
5521656 | Portney | May 1996 | A |
5522891 | Klaas | Jun 1996 | A |
5549760 | Becker | Aug 1996 | A |
5562731 | Cumming | Oct 1996 | A |
5578081 | McDonald | Nov 1996 | A |
5607472 | Thompson | Mar 1997 | A |
5620720 | Glick et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628795 | Langerman | May 1997 | A |
5628796 | Suzuki | May 1997 | A |
5652014 | Galin et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652638 | Roffman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653754 | Nakajima et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657108 | Portney | Aug 1997 | A |
5674282 | Cumming | Oct 1997 | A |
5682223 | Menezes et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684560 | Roffman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5725576 | Fedorov et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5766244 | Binder | Jun 1998 | A |
5769890 | McDonald | Jun 1998 | A |
5776191 | Mazzocco | Jul 1998 | A |
5776192 | McDonald | Jul 1998 | A |
5800533 | Eggleston et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814103 | Lipshitz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824074 | Koch | Oct 1998 | A |
5843188 | McDonald | Dec 1998 | A |
5876442 | Lipshitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5928283 | Gross et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5968094 | Werblin et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984962 | Anello et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013101 | Israel | Jan 2000 | A |
6096078 | McDonald | Aug 2000 | A |
6106554 | Bretton | Aug 2000 | A |
6113633 | Portney | Sep 2000 | A |
6117171 | Skottun | Sep 2000 | A |
6120538 | Rizzo et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6136026 | Israel | Oct 2000 | A |
6176878 | Gwon et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197058 | Portney | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197059 | Cumming | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200342 | Tassignon | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217612 | Woods | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231603 | Lang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238433 | Portney | May 2001 | B1 |
6258123 | Young et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277146 | Peyman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280471 | Peyman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
RE37387 | Brady et al. | Sep 2001 | E |
6299641 | Woods | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327772 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342073 | Cumming et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6358280 | Herrick | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387126 | Cumming | May 2002 | B1 |
6406494 | Laguette et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423094 | Sarfarazi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443985 | Woods | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450642 | Jethmalani et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454802 | Bretton et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464725 | Skotton | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6478821 | Laguette et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488708 | Sarfarazi | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6494911 | Cumming | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6503275 | Cumming | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6503276 | Lang et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6524340 | Israel | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524350 | Buentello et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6533813 | Lin et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547822 | Lang | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551354 | Ghazizadeh et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554859 | Lang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558420 | Green | May 2003 | B2 |
6599317 | Weinschenk, III et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6616691 | Tran | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6616692 | Glick et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645246 | Weinschenk et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660035 | Lang et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6761737 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764511 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767363 | Bandhauer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6786934 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6818017 | Shu | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6818158 | Pham et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6846326 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6858040 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6884261 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884263 | Valyunin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899732 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6926736 | Peng et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7041134 | Nguyen et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7087080 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097660 | Portney | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7118596 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118597 | Miller et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125422 | Woods et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7198640 | Nguyen | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226478 | Ting et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7238201 | Portney et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7452362 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7452378 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7662180 | Paul et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7744603 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744646 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7780729 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010001836 | Cumming | May 2001 | A1 |
20020002404 | Sarfarazi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004682 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020045937 | Sarfarazi | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020068971 | Cumming | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072795 | Green | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095212 | Boehm | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120329 | Lang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138140 | Hanna | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020193876 | Lang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002404 | Maekawa | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018384 | Valyunin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033013 | Callahan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050695 | Lin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050696 | Cumming | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050697 | Paul | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060878 | Shadduck | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060881 | Glick et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078657 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078658 | Zadno-Azizi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083744 | Khoury | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093149 | Glazier | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105522 | Glazier | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114927 | Nagamoto | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130732 | Sarfarazi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030187504 | Weinschenk, III et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204255 | Peng et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040015236 | Sarfarazi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040082995 | Woods | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040158322 | Shen | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050131535 | Woods | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050267575 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060178741 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184244 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060238702 | Glick et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259139 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271187 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070050025 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078515 | Brady | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106377 | Smith et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070108643 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3225789 | Oct 1989 | AU |
2702117 | Jul 1978 | DE |
3246306 | Jun 1984 | DE |
19501444 | Jul 1996 | DE |
10125829 | Nov 2002 | DE |
0162573 | Nov 1985 | EP |
0212616 | Mar 1987 | EP |
246216 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0329981 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0337390 | Oct 1989 | EP |
0337390 | Oct 1989 | EP |
0342895 | Nov 1989 | EP |
0351471 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0420549 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0336877 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0566170 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0691109 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0897702 | Feb 1999 | EP |
2058391 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2124500 | Feb 1984 | GB |
2129155 | May 1984 | GB |
2146791 | Apr 1985 | GB |
2192291 | Jan 1988 | GB |
2215076 | Sep 1989 | GB |
02-126847 | May 1990 | JP |
2014038 | Jun 1994 | RU |
2014039 | Jun 1994 | RU |
WO 8404449 | Nov 1984 | WO |
WO 8504566 | Oct 1985 | WO |
WO 8603961 | Jul 1986 | WO |
WO 8700299 | Jan 1987 | WO |
WO 8707496 | Dec 1987 | WO |
WO 8902251 | Mar 1989 | WO |
WO 8911672 | Nov 1989 | WO |
WO 9416648 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO 9503783 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9615734 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9625126 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9743984 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9903427 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9920206 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0021467 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0027315 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0061036 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0066037 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0119289 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0134067 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0164136 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0166042 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 02071983 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 03009051 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03015657 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03057081 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03059196 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03084441 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03092552 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004000171 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004010905 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004073559 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090611 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
ASCRS Symposium of Cataracts IOL and Refractive Surgery. ASOA Congress on Ophthalmic Practice Management. Clinical & Surgical Staff Program. Partial Program re: ASCRS Symposium, Showing Video Tape Shown between Apr. 10-14, 1999. |
Tsutomu Hara et al., “Accommodative Intraocular Lens with Spring Action Part 1. Design and Placement in an Excised Animal Eye,” Ophthalmic Surgery, Feb. 1990, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 128-133. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/012032, Jan. 2004. |
Adler-Grinberg, Deborah, “Questioning Our Classical Understanding of Accommodation and Presbyopia,” American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics 1986; 63: 571-580. |
Prosecution History of Patent No. 6,764,511, issued Jul. 20, 2004, including Office Actions of Jul. 14, 2003; and Amendments of Nov. 1, 2002, Mar. 14, 2003, Dec. 12, 2003, and Jan. 8, 2004; and Notice of Allowance of Apr. 7, 2004. |
Prosecution History of Patent No. 7,452,378, issued Nov. 18, 2008, including Office Actions of Sep. 5, 2007, and Apr. 18, 2008; and Amendments of Jan. 7, 2008, Jun. 17, 2008, Jul. 14, 2008; and Notice of Allowance of Jul. 14, 2008. |
Thornton. Accommodation in Pseudophakia, 25. pp. 159-162. Dec. 1992. |
“AMO Specs Model AC-21B”, AMO Classic Series. PMM IntraOcular Lenses. 1992. 5 pages. |
Fechner, et al. “Iris-claw lens in Phakic eyes to correct hyperopia: Preliminary Study”. Journal Cataract Refract Surgery, vol. 24, Jan. 1998, pp. 48-56. |
Menezo, et al. “Endothelial study of iris-claw phakic lens: Four year follow-up”. Journal Cataract Refract Surgery, vol. 24, Aug. 1998, pp. 1039-1049. |
Alcon Surgical, Aleon Laboratories. No date given. |
Chauvin-Opsia, Azunte ACL (0459) No date given. |
Chiron, Clemente Optifit Model SPSP525 Brochure Translation, Dec. 1998. |
Chiron Vision, Nunta Mar. 20, 1997. 5 pages. |
Hanita Lenses. Ocular Surgery News Intl No date given. |
Iolab Corp. Opthalmology Times. Mar. 15, 1995. |
Mediphacos Ltd. Ocular Surgery News Intl No date given. |
New Elliptical Accommodating IOL for Cataract Surgery shown at ASCRS Symposium on Apr. 1, 1999 (Digital Video Disc). |
Opthamed, Inc. OMAC-260. No date given. |
Storz. Opthalmics Inc. Model LIZZUV ACL No date given. |
Universe IOL Center. Ocular Surgery News Intl No date given. |
World Optics, Inc. Ophthalmology Times. Mar. 15, 1995. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/656,661, filed Sep. 7, 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/721,072, filed Nov. 22, 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/426,888, filed on Jun. 27, 2006. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120310342 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60563238 | Apr 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12861732 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13588629 | US | |
Parent | 10958871 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 12861732 | US |