The present application generally relates to intravascular electrodes and associated methods for delivering therapy to nervous system targets.
Applicant's prior Application Publication No. U.S. 2007/0255379, discloses an intravascular neurostimulation device (such as a pulse generator) and associated methods for using the neurostimulation device to stimulate nervous system targets. In various ones of the disclosed embodiments, electrodes positioned within a blood vessel (e.g. a jugular vein, superior vena cava, or inferior vena cava) are used to transvascularly stimulate nervous system targets located outside the vasculature. Such stimulation can be used to lower heart rate and/or control blood pressure as a treatment for hypertension or HF. Anchors are described for maintaining the electrodes in contact with the blood vessel wall. The anchors include structural features that allow the anchor to radially engage a vessel wall. As described, a band, sleeve, mesh or other framework formed of one or more shape memory (e.g. nickel titanium alloy, nitinol, thermally activated shape-memory material, or shape memory polymer) elements or stainless steel, Elgiloy, or MP35N elements may be used as an anchor. In use, the anchor (with the electrodes thereon) may be released from a sheath within the blood vessel, such that the anchor expands into contact with the blood vessel and thereby biases the electrodes against the vessel wall.
Applicant's co-pending application Ser. No. 12/413,495, filed Mar. 27, 2009 and entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANS VASCULARLY STIMULATING CONTENTS OF THE CAROTID SHEATH discloses a method for transvascularly stimulating the vagus nerve and other nervous system structures, such as those disposed within the carotid sheath. The disclosed method includes advancing an energy delivery element, which may be an electrode, into an internal jugular vein, retaining the energy delivery element in a portion of the internal jugular vein contained within a carotid sheath, and energizing the energy delivery element to transvenously direct energy to target contents of the carotid sheath external to the internal jugular vein. The energy may be directed to a carotid artery within the carotid sinus sheath, and/or to a carotid sinus nerve or nerve branch within the carotid sinus sheath, to nerve branches emanating from carotid artery baroreceptors, and/or to a vagus nerve or associated nerve branch within the carotid sinus sheath. In some of the disclosed embodiments, a bi-lateral system is employed, in which a second electrode or other second energy delivery element is introduced into a second internal jugular vein and retained in a portion of the second internal jugular vein contained within a second carotid sheath. The second energy delivery element is energized to direct energy to contents of the second carotid sheath external to the second internal jugular vein. The right vagus nerve primarily innervates the sinoatrial node of the heart;
stimulation of this nerve increases the duration of the cardiac cycle. The left vagus nerve primarily innervates the atrioventricular (AV) node of the heart; stimulation of this nerve slows AV conduction. The assignor of the present application conducted anatomical studies on human cadavers to investigate the relative location of the right vagus nerve to veins that could provide sites for transvenous vagal stimulation to reduce heart rate and blood pressure. The findings strongly support the rationale for a transvenous approach to vagus nerve stimulation in the human. The right vagus nerve and its cardiac branches closely and reliably course directly alongside the largest veins in the neck and superior mediastinum, namely the right internal jugular vein, right brachiocephalic vein, superior vena cava, and azygotic arch.
The present application describes designs of intravascular electrodes that may be positioned within the vasculature and used for stimulation of nervous targets.
The substrate includes a relatively narrow portion 16, and a broader paddle portion 18 on which the electrodes are positioned. Although the longitudinal axes of the narrow and broader portions 18 are longitudinally aligned, in alternative embodiments the paddle portion 18 may be positioned asymmetrically relative to the longitudinal axis of the narrow portion. Embodiments of this type are illustrated in
The electrodes are deposited on one face of the substrate 14, such that the substrate provides an electrically insulative backing and electrically isolates the electrodes from one another. In other embodiments, the electrodes may be positioned in openings formed through the substrate. Conductive traces 20 are formed on the substrate and extend proximally from each of the electrodes 12, terminating at contacts near the proximal end of the narrow portion 16. A lead 17 which may be formed of tubing, shrink material, or other suitable material, is disposed over at least a portion of narrow portion 16, and includes conductors electrically coupled to the contacts of the traces 20.
The substrate is preferably a material that provides an electrically insulative backing to the electrodes. The material might be one capable of curving relative to the vessel's longitudinal axis to approximately match the curvature of a blood vessel wall when held in contact with the wall by an anchor (see e.g. the
In some embodiments, all or a portion of the substrate may be of a type that resorbs or degrades over time, as tissue growth (e.g., cellular encapsulation, in-growth, endothelialization) begins to retain the electrodes in position. Materials suitable for this use include, but are not limited to, polylactide (PLA), polyglycolide (PGA) and their copolymer (PGLA). In such embodiments, the electrodes may be provided with non-degradable insulating material on the portions of the electrodes which are not intended for contact with the vessel wall, such that the insulating material remains intact following resorption or degradation of the substrate. In other embodiments, the flex circuit may be coated to improve its biocompatibiliy and to reduce the body's response to a foreign substance.
For array implantation, it is desirable for the user to be able to empirically select an electrode location by positioning the electrode array, delivering stimulation from the selected location, measuring the response, and then repeating the process with the electrodes at one or more different locations within the blood vessel. This mapping process allows the user to evaluate the response at various stimulation sites, so s/he may select the most optimal stimulation site for more permanent array positioning.
In the first embodiment, a temporary anchor 11 is positionable in contact with the substrate 14 for use in retaining the array during mapping. The temporary anchor 11 may be releasably attached to the substrate 14, or it may be separate from the substrate. Referring to
Other temporary anchor shapes include, but are not limited to, those shown in
The
The
The
In use, the array and temporary anchor are disposed within a delivery sheath (not shown). The sheath is advanced to a desired location with a target vessel (e.g. the superior vena cava for vagus nerve stimulation). The array and temporary anchor are released from the sheath. Mapping is achieved by releasing and engaging the electrode against the vessel wall, stimulating and observing the response, then, if necessary, recovering the array and anchor into the sheath. The sheath is advanced to another location and the process is repeated until the target location (at which the most optimal response to stimulation is measured) is identified.
A second array system shown in
The flexible substrate material of the array 32 may include a plurality of tabs 39. The tabs are most easily seen in
Two or more electrodes 38 are longitudinally arranged on each arm 36. When the system is assembled, the electrodes 38 are positioned such that their conductive surfaces face away from the anchor 30a as shown, and so that they will contact the inner wall of the target vessel when the anchor 30a is expanded. See
As with the first embodiment, conductive traces are formed on the substrate and extend proximally from each of the electrodes, terminating at contacts near the proximal end of the narrow portion splines. A lead (not shown) which may be formed of tubing, shrink material, or other suitable material, is disposed over at least a proximal portion of the array (such as where the splines meet at the proximal end), and includes conductors electrically coupled to the contacts of the traces.
The second array system is deployable from a sheath as discussed above. After mapping is completed using a process similar to that described above, the anchor-electrode assembly is expanded and firmly deployed against the target vessel, maintaining the mapping-defined orientation.
The anchor may be actively expandable but is more preferably self-expandable when released from a sheath. The anchor includes at least a first portion 56 configured to temporarily retain the electrodes in position against the vessel wall for mapping, and a second portion 58 that will chronically retain the implant at the chosen position within the vessel once the optimal array position has been selected. In a preferred embodiment, the anchor is an expandable stent-like sleeve, and the first (temporary) anchor portion 56 is positioned distally of the second (chronic) anchor portion 58. The first and second portions are configured such that the radial expansion forces of the second portion are greater than the radial expansion forces of the first portion.
In use, the integrated anchor is disposed within a delivery sheath. The sheath is advanced to a desired location with a target vessel (e.g. the superior vena cava for vagus nerve stimulation). The first (temporary) portion 56 of the anchor is released from the sheath, placing the electrodes into contact with the vessel wall. Mapping is performed at the target location. The properties of the first portion allow it to be resheathed, and then repositioned and redeployed so that mapping may be carried out at additional sites if necessary. Once the optimal stimulation site is determined, the sheath is fully withdrawn to release the second (chronic) portion 58 of the anchor, thus firmly anchoring the electrodes at the chosen location within the blood vessel.
The disclosed electrodes may be utilized for transvenous electrical stimulation from within the superior vena cava (SVC) or internal jugular vein to the vagus nerve to achieve reduction in blood pressure and heart rate, such as for treatment of congestive heart failure or other conditions.
Animal studies were conducted in an effort to characterize parameters for electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve and non-target tissues. Results are presented in the graphs at
Transvenous vagal neurostimulation with appropriate parameters and orientation reliably and reproducibly achieved Significant Cardiovascular Effect (defined as concurrent decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) >10% and increase in R-R interval (duration of cardiac cycle) >20%) at intravascular sites corresponding to the level of each cervical vertebrae C1-C7 and thoracic vertebrae T1-T3.
Threshold testing was conducted at each anatomic level from C1-T3 and systematic stimulus-response testing was performed for each of 3 key variables: intensity (current), frequency, and duration (pulse width).
Appropriate parameter selection enabled sustained significant cardiovascular effect up to 12 minutes (longest tested duration) without aberrant oscillation of heart rate and blood pressure; hemodynamic parameters typically returned to baseline within 30 seconds after stimulation without rebound tachycardia.
In no case did an animal become permanently refractory to vagal stimulation after significant cardiovascular effect was achieved, although vagal overdrive with supramaximal stimulation parameters transiently (<120 seconds) increased the stimulation threshold for significant cardiovascular effect in some cases.
Muscarinic blockade by administration of atropine abolished the cardiovascular effects of vagal nerve stimulation, indicating that these effects are mediated by efferent vagal parasympathetic fibers.
Collateral stimulation of non-target tissue predictably varied with stimulation location based on regional anatomy. Appropriate selection of stimulation parameters enabled achievement of significant cardiovascular effect without evidence of adverse effects (stimulation of other regional nerves or muscles) at all levels with the exception of C1 and C3, where stimulation invariably caused significant vibrations in the cervical musculature.
Stimulus response testing was conducted in canine models. Significant cardiovascular effects (reduction in MAP >10% increase in R-R interval >20%) were achieved with transvenous vagal nerve stimulation at each anatomic level from C1-T3 at threshold currents ranging from 2.8-8.9 mA. Stimulation sites with threshold current requirements ≦6 mA were identified in each of the following vessels: right internal jugular vein, right brachiocephalic vein, right costocervicalis vein, and SVC. The lowest thresholds identified were at C3 (3.1 mA), C4 (3.4 mA), T3 (3.7 mA), and in the costocervicalis vein at the level of T2 (2.8 mA).
Increasing current above threshold produced an amplitude-dependent increase in cardiovascular effect. Strength-response curves are presented in Graphs 2 and 3 (
Amplitude in the present study is primarily represented in terms of current (mA) rather than voltage (V) in order to facilitate direct comparison of the extracellular electric field generated by different multipolar electrode types with different average impedances at the electrode-tissue interface. The average impedances for the first electrode catheter (used here for transvenous vagal stimulation from the internal jugular vein) and the second electrode catheter (used for transvenous vagal stimulation from the SVC) were 730 Ω and 1150 Ω, respectively. For considerations of power consumption, it should be noted that significant cardiovascular effect was achieved at every level from C1-T3 at output voltages ranging from 2.5V-8.8V (mean 4.8V). For reference, currently-available voltage-regulated pulse generators for neurostimulation are programmable to deliver voltage up to 10.5V.
Frequency-response testing at constant suprathreshold current and duration demonstrated progressive slowing of the cardiac cycle with increasing stimulation frequency up to 40 Hz. Response progressively deteriorated as frequency was further increased above 40 Hz (up to 100 Hz), presumably due to neural fatigue. Similarly, increasing frequency causes a progressive drop in MAP up to 20-40 Hz; further increasing frequency beyond this optimal range results in suboptimal MAP response. Frequency-response curves for transvenous vagal nerve stimulation are presented in Graphs 4 and 5 (
Strength-duration testing demonstrated reliable, reproducible cardiovascular effects of transvenous vagal nerve stimulation for pulse widths >2 ms (Graph 6,
All prior patents and applications referred to herein, including for purposes of priority, are incorporated by reference for all purposes. It should be recognized that a number of variations of the above-identified embodiments will be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the foregoing description. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited by those specific embodiments and methods of the present invention shown and described herein. Rather, the scope of the invention is to be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. Ser. No. 13/068,866, filed Jul. 11, 2011, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/378,925, filed Aug. 31, 2010.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61378925 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13068866 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 14105152 | US |