Intrinsically safe field maintenance tools are known. Such tools are highly useful in the process control and measurement industry to allow operators to conveniently communicate with and/or interrogate field devices in a given process installation. Examples of such process installations include petroleum, pharmaceutical, chemical, pulp and other processing installations. In such installations, the process control and measurement network may include tens or even hundreds of various field devices which periodically require maintenance to ensure that such devices are functioning properly and/or calibrated. Moreover, when one or more errors in the process control and measurement installation is detected, the use of an intrinsically safe hand held field maintenance tool allows technicians to quickly diagnose such errors in the field.
One such device is sold under the trade designation Model 275 HART® Communicator available from Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc., of Eden Prairie, Minn. HART® is a registered trademark of the HART® Communication Foundation. The Model 275 provides a host of important functions and capabilities and generally allows highly effective field maintenance. However, the Model 275 does not currently support communication with non-HART® (Highway Addressable Remote Transducer) devices.
The HART® protocol has a hybrid physical layer consisting of digital communication signals superimposed on the standard 4-20 mA analog signal. The data transmission rate is approximately 1.2 Kbits/SEC. HART® communication is one of the primary communication protocols in process industries.
Another major process industry communication protocol is known as the FOUNDATION™ fieldbus communication protocol. This protocol is based on an ISA standard (ISA-S50.01-1992, promulgated by the Instrument Society of America in 1992). A practical implementation was specified by the Fieldbus Foundation (FF). FOUNDATION™ Fieldbus is an all-digital communication protocol with a transmission rate of approximately 31.25 Kbits/SEC.
Known intrinsically safe field maintenance tools are not able to effectively interact using more than one process industry standard protocol. Providing a device that has the ability to operate with more than one process industry standard protocol as well as effectively providing protocol-specific calibration and configuration options would represent a significant advance in the art.
An improved intrinsically safe field maintenance tool is provided. The tool is operable with process communication loops in accordance with a plurality of process industry standard protocols. Aspects of the invention include hardware features such as an infrared port; removable memory module; and an expansion memory module. Additional aspects of the invention include protocol-specific diagnostic methods executable with the improved intrinsically safe field maintenance tool.
An improved intrinsically safe field maintenance tool in accordance with embodiments of the present invention is operable with at least two industry standard device descriptions. In one specific embodiment, an improved intrinsically safe field maintenance tool implements both HART® and fieldbus Device Description Language (DDL). The improved field maintenance tool is used to maintain both two-wire and four-wire (i.e. external power) field devices using these protocols. Preferably, both configuration and calibration are supported via DDL technology. DDL technology is known and additional reading regarding Device Description Language can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,960,214 to Sharp, Jr. et al.
The improved intrinsically safe field maintenance tool also facilitates a convenient display of diagnostic information from individual field devices (i.e. status bits) as well as providing advanced protocol-specific network troubleshooting features. Further details and benefits of the improved intrinsically safe field maintenance tool in accordance with embodiments of the present invention will be appreciated after reading the description below.
In this illustration, process communication or process control loop 18 is a FOUNDATION™ fieldbus process communication loop and is coupled to field devices 20, which are shown coupled arranged in a multi-drop configuration. An alternative process communication loop (not shown) is an HART® process communication loop.
Intrinsically safe field maintenance tool 22 is coupled to loop 18 as illustrated in FIG. 1. When coupled to a process control loop as shown, tool 22 can perform a number of the communication and diagnostic functions. Tool 22 can couple to and interact with HART® process communication loops in much the same way the presently available Model 275 HART® Communicator can.
Processor 36 is also coupled to keypad module 38 and display module 40. Keypad module 38 is coupled to the keypad on the housing of tool 22 in order to receive various keypad inputs from a user. Display module 40 is coupled to the display to provide data and/or a user interface.
In accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, tool 22 includes additional hardware enhancements that facilitate increased functionality over that generally available in the prior art. In one embodiment, tool 22 includes infrared data access port 42 which is coupled to processor 36 to allow tool 22 to transfer information to and from a separate device using infrared wireless communication. One advantageous use of port 42 is for transferring and/or updating Device Descriptions stored in one or more memories of tool 22. A Device Description (DD) is a software technology used to describe parameters in a field device in a computer-readable format. This contains all of the information necessary for a software application being executed on processor 36 to retrieve and use the parametric data. The separate device such as computer 12, can obtain a new Device Description from floppy disk, CD ROM, or the internet and wirelessly transfer the new Device Description to tool 22.
Removable memory module 44 is removably coupled to processor 36 via port/interface 46. Removable memory module 44 is adapted to store software applications that can be executed instead of primary applications on processor 36. For example, module 44 may contain applications that use the HART® or FOUNDATION™ fieldbus communication port, to provide a comprehensive diagnostic for a given process valve. Additionally, module 44 may store software applications that aid in the calibration or configuration of specific devices. Module 44 may also store a software image for a new or updated primary device application that can subsequently be transferred into the non-volatile memory of device 36 to enable execution of the updated application. Further still, module 44 provides removable memory storage for the configuration of multiple devices allowing a field maintenance operator to acquire a relatively substantial amount of device data and conveniently store or transfer such data by simply removing module 44.
Preferably, module 44 is adapted to be replaceable in hazardous areas in a process plant. Thus, it is preferred that module 44 comply with intrinsic safety requirements set forth in: APPROVAL STANDARD INTRINSICALLY SAFE APPARATUS AND ASSOCIATED APPARATUS FOR USE IN CLASS I, II AND III, DIVISION 1 HAZARDOUS (CLASSIFIED) LOCATIONS, CLASS NUMBER 3610, promulgated by Factory Mutual Research October, 1988. Adaptations to comply with additional industrial standards such as Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and the European CENELEC standards are also contemplated. Examples of specific structural adaptations for memory module 44 and/or interface 46 to facilitate compliance include energy limiting circuits such that the operating voltage level of memory module 44 is sufficiently low that stored energy within module 44 cannot generate a source of ignition. Additionally, module 44 may include current limiting circuitry to ensure that in the event that specific terminals on module 44 are shorted, that the discharge energy is sufficiently low that ignition is inhibited. Finally, interface 44 may include physical characteristics that are specifically designed to prevent exposure of electrical contacts on memory module 44 to an external environment while simultaneously allowing suitable interface contacts to make electrical contact with module 44. For example, module 44 may include an over-modeling that can be pierced or otherwise displaced by coupling module 44 to interface 46.
Tool 22 also preferably includes expansion memory module 48 coupled to processor 36 via connector 50 which is preferably disposed on the main board of tool 22. Expansion memory module 48 may contain Device Descriptions of first and second industry standard protocols. Module 48 may also contain license code(s) that will determine the functionality of tool 22 with respect to the multiple protocols. For example, data residing within module 48 may indicate that tool 22 is only authorized to operate within a single process industry standard mode, such as the HART® protocol. Ultimately, a different setting of that data within module 48 may indicate that tool 22 is authorized to operate in accordance with two or more industry standard protocols. Module 48 is preferably inserted to a connector 50 on the main board and may in fact require partial disassembly of tool 22, such as removing the battery pack to access port 50.
The improved intrinsically safe field maintenance tool described above facilitates enhanced fieldbus-specific and HART®-specific diagnostics as will be set forth in greater detail below.
Tool 22 can also measure additional characteristics of the FOUNDATION™ fieldbus segment to which it is coupled. Specifically, tool 22 can be used to measure the noise level on the fieldbus segment. Preferably, tool 22 employs one or more frequency-specific filters to measure signal amplitude within a selected frequency band. For example, tool 22 preferably employs a low-pass filter to extract a low-frequency portion of noise present on the fieldbus segment. This parameter can provide valuable troubleshooting information to field maintenance operators. Specifically, it may indicate a problem caused by a faulty power supply. Additionally, tool 22 can employ a band-pass filter to extract noise information near the frequency of FOUNDATION™ Fieldbus signaling frequencies during the time between messages. This parameter can provide valuable troubleshooting information to field maintenance operators, since noise near the FOUNDATION™ fieldbus signaling frequency can make the real FOUNDATION™ fieldbus signal very vulnerable. Additionally, tool 22 can also be used to measure the capacitance in a FOUNDATION™ fieldbus segment. The capacitance information can be used to detect shielding or grounding problems.
The improved intrinsically safe field maintenance tool can also be used to execute a number of HART® specific diagnostics. For example, tool 22 is preferably adapted to communicate using two distinct voltage levels for HART® communications. The first HART® communications voltage level (normal) is selected to meet the HART® specifications set forth above. However, the second voltage level is for communication by tool 22 in an enhanced communication mode when tool 22 will generate a stronger signal than meets the HART® specification and will listen and respond to signals weaker than those normally allowed by the HART® specification. Preferably, HART network diagnostic method includes sending a HART® command zero to each HART® network address in normal mode. The sent message count is incremented every time tool 22 attempts to communicate with a given HART® address. If a reply with no errors is received by tool 22, the diagnostics within tool 22 increment the count of good replies received by that address and the diagnostic method moves on to the next address. However, if there is either an error in the reply from the selected network address, or no reply at all, then tool 22 transitions into the enhanced communication mode. In the enhanced communication mode, the higher voltage level is used to generate HART® communication signals that are at amplitudes which exceed those normally allowed by the HART® specification. If a reply with no errors is received from the selected network address in the enhanced communication mode, then the weak reply count of that network address is incremented. Tool 22 moves to the next network address and will continue to try all network addresses until the field maintenance operator instructs tool 22 to halt, or an auto-power off event occurs. Preferably, software within tool 22 allows the field maintenance user to select specific HART network addresses to be polled. Further still, groups of network addresses are also preferably selectable. Thus, a field maintenance operator could, for example, selectably pull address 0, 1 and 4.
Additional portions of display 80 are shown at 96, 98 and 100. Portion 96, when selected by the field maintenance operator, will selectably start and stop the network scan. Portion 98 will select a specific HART® address to be scanned. Finally, selecting portion 100 allows the field maintenance operator to exit the screen.
Once a field maintenance operator has selected a specific HART® address on the screen, selecting “details portion” 88 will cause tool 22 to provide a full count for the messages, total sent, total good and total weak. A scrollable list of an arbitrary number of most recent bad replies including the time of occurrence, and error details such as parody and cyclic redundancy check (CRC) can be provided in the details portion.
In conclusion, an improved intrinsically safe field maintenance tool includes a number of hardware enhancements as well as enhanced industry-protocol specific network diagnostics. The improved intrinsically safe field maintenance tool is advantageously useable with a plurality of process communication and measurement loops having one or the other industry standard communication protocols. Thus, a field maintenance technician need not carry multiple distinct hand held devices into the field, but may advantageously use a single tool to interact with a plurality of process industry standard communication loops.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/338,477, filed Dec. 6, 2001, entitled “INTRINSICALLY SAFE FIELD MAINTENANCE TOOL,” which application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4337516 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4630265 | Sexton | Dec 1986 | A |
4635214 | Kasai et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4707796 | Calabro et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4954923 | Hoeflich et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4964125 | Kim | Oct 1990 | A |
4988990 | Warrior | Jan 1991 | A |
5005142 | Lipchak et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5103409 | Shimizu et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5113303 | Herres | May 1992 | A |
5150289 | Badavas | Sep 1992 | A |
5197328 | Fitzgerald | Mar 1993 | A |
5434774 | Seberger | Jul 1995 | A |
5442639 | Crowder et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5469156 | Kogure | Nov 1995 | A |
5481200 | Voegele et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5570300 | Henry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5573032 | Lenz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5598521 | Kilgore et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5623605 | Keshav et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5665899 | Willcox | Sep 1997 | A |
5742845 | Wagner | Apr 1998 | A |
5764891 | Warrior | Jun 1998 | A |
5828567 | Eryurek et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838187 | Embree | Nov 1998 | A |
5923557 | Eidson | Jul 1999 | A |
5940290 | Dixon | Aug 1999 | A |
5956663 | Eryurek | Sep 1999 | A |
5960214 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970430 | Burns et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980078 | Krivoshein et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6017143 | Eryurek et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023399 | Kogure | Feb 2000 | A |
6026352 | Burns et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6047222 | Burns et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052655 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6094600 | Sharpe, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6111738 | McGoogan | Aug 2000 | A |
6119047 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6179964 | Begemann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192281 | Brown et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199018 | Quist et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236334 | Tapperson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263487 | Stripf et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270920 | Nakanishi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298377 | Hartkainen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307483 | Westfield et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324607 | Korowitz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6356191 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370448 | Eryurek | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377859 | Brown et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397114 | Eryurek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6434504 | Eryurek et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444350 | Toya et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449574 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473710 | Eryurek | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6505517 | Eryurek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519546 | Eryurek et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532392 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539267 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6594603 | Eryurek et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601005 | Eryurek et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611775 | Coursolle et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615149 | Wehrs | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629059 | Borgeson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6654697 | Eryurek et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656145 | Morton | Dec 2003 | B1 |
20010053065 | Cudini et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020065631 | Loechner | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077711 | Nixon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020123864 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030023795 | Packwood et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033040 | Billings | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29917651 | Dec 2000 | DE |
1993 0660 | Jan 2001 | DE |
1 022 626 | Oct 1997 | EP |
1022626 | Jul 2000 | EP |
2347232 | Aug 2000 | GB |
2753592 | Jan 1990 | JP |
WO9612993 | May 1996 | WO |
WO9721157 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO9814855 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO9839718 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 0041050 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 00557000 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 02027418 | Apr 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030109937 A1 | Jun 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60338477 | Dec 2001 | US |