The present invention relates to a laryngeal mask airway device with a fiber optic assembly. More specifically, the present invention relates to an intutbating laryngeal mask airway device with a fiber optic assembly.
The laryngeal mask airway device is a well known device that is useful for establishing airways in unconscious patients. U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,514 is one of the many publications that describe laryngeal mask airway devices. Such devices have been in use for many years and offer an alternative to the older, even better known, endotracheal tube. For at least seventy years, endotracheal tubes comprising a long slender tube with an inflatable balloon disposed at the tube's distal end have been used for establishing airways in unconscious patients. In operation, the endotracheal tube's distal end is inserted through the mouth of the patient, past the patient's laryngeal inlet (or glottic opening), and into the patient's trachea. Once so positioned, the balloon is inflated so as to form a seal with the interior lining of the trachea. After this seal is established, positive pressure may be applied to the tube's proximal end to ventilate the patient's lungs. Also, the seal between the balloon and the inner lining of the trachea protects the lungs from aspiration (e.g., the seal prevents material regurgitated from the stomach from being aspirated into the patient's lungs).
Although they have been enormously successful, endotracheal tubes suffer from several major disadvantages. The principal disadvantage of the endotracheal tube relates to the difficulty of properly inserting the tube. Inserting an endotracheal tube into a patient is a procedure that requires a high degree of skill. Also, even for skilled practitioners, insertion of an endotracheal tube is sometimes difficult or not possible. In many instances, the difficulty of inserting endotracheal tubes has tragically led to the death of a patient because it was not possible to establish an airway in the patient with sufficient rapidity. Also, inserting an endotracheal tube normally requires manipulations of the patient's head and neck and further requires the patient's jaw to be forcibly opened widely. These necessary manipulations make it difficult, or undesirable, to insert an endotracheal tube into a patient who may be suffering from a neck injury.
In contrast to the endotracheal tube, it is relatively easy to insert a laryngeal mask airway device into a patient and thereby establish an airway. Also, the laryngeal mask airway device is a “forgiving” device in that even if it is inserted improperly, it still tends to establish an airway. Accordingly, the laryngeal mask airway device is often thought of as a “life saving” device. Also, the laryngeal mask airway device may be inserted with only relatively minor manipulations of the patient's head, neck, and jaw. Further, the laryngeal mask airway device provides for ventilation of the patient's lungs without requiring contact with the sensitive inner lining of the trachea and the size of the airway established is typically significantly larger than the size of the airway established with an endotracheal tube. Also, the laryngeal mask airway device does not interfere with coughing to the same extent as endotracheal tubes. Largely due to these advantages, the laryngeal mask airway device has enjoyed increasing popularity in recent years.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,303,697 and 6,079,409 describe examples of a type of prior art device that may be referred to as an “intubating laryngeal mask airway device.” The intubating device is useful for facilitating insertion of an endotracheal tube. After an intubating laryngeal mask airway device has been located in the patient, the device can act as a guide for a subsequently inserted endotracheal tube. Use of the laryngeal mask airway device in this fashion facilitates what is commonly known as “blind insertion” of the endotracheal tube. Only minor movements of the patient's head, neck, and jaw are required to insert the intubating laryngeal mask airway device, and once the device has been located in the patient, the endotracheal tube may be inserted with virtually no additional movements of the patient. This stands in contrast to the relatively large motions of the patient's head, neck, and jaw that would be required if the endotracheal tube were inserted without the assistance of the intubating laryngeal mask airway device.
One popular form of intubating laryngeal mask airway device has been marketed commercially for many yeas as the “Fastrach” by the Laryngeal Mask Company of Cyprus.
Device 100 includes a rigid steel airway tube 110, a silicone mask portion 130, a rigid steel handle 180, and an inflation line 190. The handle 180 is attached to airway tube 110 near a proximal end 112 of the tube. Mask portion 130 is attached to airway tube 110 at a distal end 114 of the tube. Mask portion 130 includes a dome shaped backplate 132 and an inflatable cuff 134. Mask portion 130 also includes an epiglottis elevator bar 150. One end 152 of bar 150 is attached to the backplate 132. The other end 154 of the bar 150 is “free floating”, or not attached to any other portion of the device. The bar 150 is in effect hinged to the rest of the mask portion.
In operation, cuff 134 is deflated, and the mask portion is then inserted through the patient's mouth into the patient's pharynx, while the proximal end 112 of the airway tube and the handle 180 remain outside of the patient's mouth. The handle 180 may be used for manipulating the device. The cuff 134 is then inflated to form a seal around the patient's glottic opening. After the device 100 is so positioned, a distal opening 117 of the device (shown in
As shown in
The Fastrach is a reusable device and may be sterilized (and reused) many times before becoming too worn for reuse. Although the Fastrach has performed very well, there remains a need for improved intubating laryngeal mask airway devices.
These and other objects are provided by an improved intubating laryngeal mask airway device. The device includes an optical system for enabling the physician to insure that the distal end of the device is properly aligned with the patient's trachea before inserting an endotracheal tube through the device. Also, the airway tube may be fabricated from an inexpensive material, such as plastic, instead of steel, so that the device may be used as a disposable device.
Still other objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description wherein several embodiments are shown and described, simply by way of illustration of the best mode of the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various respects, all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not in a restrictive or limiting sense, with the scope of the application being indicated in the claims.
For a fuller understanding of the nature and objects of the present invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which the same reference numerals are used to indicate the same or similar parts wherein:
Device 200 includes a rigid airway tube 210, a silicone mask portion 230, a rigid handle 280, and an inflation line 290. The handle 280 is attached to airway tube 210 near a proximal end 212 of the tube. Mask portion 230 is attached to airway tube 210 at a distal end 214 of the tube. Mask portion 230 includes a dome shaped silicone backplate 232 and an inflatable cuff 234. Mask portion 230 also includes an epiglottis elevator bar 250. One end 252 of bar 250 is attached to the backplate 232. The other end 254 of the bar 250 is “free floating”, or not attached to any other portion of the device. As shown in
As shown best in
Comparing
Another important difference between devices 100 and 200 is that device 200 includes a fiber optic system 300. Fiber optic system 300 includes a bundle of optical fibers 310 that extend from a proximal end 312 to a distal end, and a lens 314 is mounted to the optical fibers at their distal end. When the device 200 is inserted in a patient, the proximal end 312 of bundle 310 remains outside of the patient's mouth and may be connected to standard viewing devices (e.g., screens or eyepieces). The lens 314 is disposed near ramp 240.
Although the curve of the airway tube and the shape of the ramp generally facilitate blind insertion of an endotracheal tube, the fiber optic system 300 advantageously provides a view of the patient's anatomy that is aligned with the distal end of device 200. This enables alignment between the distal end of the device and the patient's glottic opening to be adjusted before attempting to insert an endotrachal tube through the device 200. If the distal end of the device is not perfectly aligned with the patient's glottic opening, as shown by the fiberoptic view obtained, the handle 280 may be used to make minor adjustments in the position of device 200 to thereby facilitate subsequent insertion of an endotracheal tube. This stands in contrast with prior art devices in which the glottic opening is sought and identified by means of an expensive mechanism built into the fiberoptic cable itself which allows its distal tip to be flexed in a single plane.
As shown best in
As shown best in
In
Bundle 310 of optical fibers generally contains two sets of fibers. One set carries light from the proximal end 312 to the lens so as to illuminate the patient's anatomy. The other set carries light received by lens 314 back to the proximal end so as to provide a view of the patient's anatomy. In the illustrated embodiment, both sets of fibers extend through a single notch 219. However, it will be appreciated that the airway tube may define two notches and each set of fibers may be housed in its own notch. In such embodiments, the notches can meet at the ramp 240 so that both sets of fibers and the lens are housed in a single aperture extending through the ramp 240.
As shown best in
In
The upright edge of notch 380 can be spaced apart from the distal end of collar 360 by about 2.5 millimeters. The upright edge that defines the proximal end of notch 370 may be spaced apart from the distal end of collar 360 by about five millimeters. Notches 370 and 380 may be about 1.5 millimeters deep.
Since certain changes may be made in the above apparatus without departing from the scope of the invention herein involved, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawing shall be interpreted in an illustrative and not a limiting sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2839788 | Dembiak | Jun 1958 | A |
2862498 | Weekes | Dec 1958 | A |
3554673 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3931822 | Marici | Jan 1976 | A |
4104357 | Blair | Aug 1978 | A |
4231365 | Scarberry | Nov 1980 | A |
4509514 | Brain | Apr 1985 | A |
4553540 | Straith | Nov 1985 | A |
4700700 | Eliachar | Oct 1987 | A |
4793327 | Frankel | Dec 1988 | A |
4846153 | Berci | Jul 1989 | A |
4850371 | Broadhurst et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4872483 | Shah | Oct 1989 | A |
4953547 | Poole, Jr. | Sep 1990 | A |
4995388 | Brain | Feb 1991 | A |
5038766 | Parker | Aug 1991 | A |
5174283 | Parker | Dec 1992 | A |
5193544 | Jaffe | Mar 1993 | A |
5235973 | Levinson | Aug 1993 | A |
5241956 | Brain | Sep 1993 | A |
5249571 | Brain | Oct 1993 | A |
5277178 | Dingley | Jan 1994 | A |
5282464 | Brain | Feb 1994 | A |
5285778 | Mackin | Feb 1994 | A |
5297547 | Brain | Mar 1994 | A |
5303697 | Brain | Apr 1994 | A |
5339805 | Parker | Aug 1994 | A |
5339808 | Don Michael | Aug 1994 | A |
5355879 | Brain | Oct 1994 | A |
5391248 | Brain | Feb 1995 | A |
5477851 | Callaghan et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5487383 | Levinson | Jan 1996 | A |
5529582 | Fukuhara | Jun 1996 | A |
5569219 | Hakki et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5582167 | Joseph | Dec 1996 | A |
5584290 | Brain | Dec 1996 | A |
5599301 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5623921 | Kinsinger et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632271 | Brain | May 1997 | A |
RE35531 | Callaghan et al. | Jun 1997 | E |
5642730 | Baran | Jul 1997 | A |
5653229 | Greenberg | Aug 1997 | A |
5655528 | Pagan | Aug 1997 | A |
5682880 | Brain | Nov 1997 | A |
5694929 | Christopher | Dec 1997 | A |
5711293 | Brain | Jan 1998 | A |
5738094 | Hoftman | Apr 1998 | A |
5743254 | Parker | Apr 1998 | A |
5743258 | Sato et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746202 | Pagan | May 1998 | A |
5771889 | Pagan | Jun 1998 | A |
5791341 | Bullard | Aug 1998 | A |
5850832 | Chu | Dec 1998 | A |
5865176 | O'Neil | Feb 1999 | A |
5878745 | Brain | Mar 1999 | A |
5881726 | Neame | Mar 1999 | A |
5896858 | Brain | Apr 1999 | A |
5915383 | Pagan | Jun 1999 | A |
5937860 | Cook | Aug 1999 | A |
5979445 | Neame et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983897 | Pagan | Nov 1999 | A |
5988167 | Kamen | Nov 1999 | A |
5996582 | Turnbull | Dec 1999 | A |
6003510 | Anunta | Dec 1999 | A |
6003514 | Pagan | Dec 1999 | A |
6012452 | Pagan | Jan 2000 | A |
6021779 | Pagan | Feb 2000 | A |
6050264 | Greenfield | Apr 2000 | A |
6070581 | Augustine et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079409 | Brain | Jun 2000 | A |
D429811 | Bermudez | Aug 2000 | S |
6095144 | Pagan | Aug 2000 | A |
6116243 | Pagan | Sep 2000 | A |
6119695 | Augustine et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6240922 | Pagan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6390093 | Mongeon | May 2002 | B1 |
6427686 | Augustine et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439232 | Brain | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6626169 | Gaitini | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6705318 | Brain | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20030131845 | Lin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2067782 | Jun 1999 | CA |
2012750 | Aug 1999 | CA |
0 389 272 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0 402 872 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0 294 200 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 580 385 | May 1996 | EP |
0 712 638 | May 1996 | EP |
0 732 116 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0 796 631 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 845 276 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0 865 798 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0 922 465 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 125 595 | Aug 2001 | EP |
2111394 | Dec 1982 | GB |
2205499 | Jun 1987 | GB |
2317342 | Aug 1997 | GB |
2317830 | Sep 1997 | GB |
2318735 | Oct 1997 | GB |
2319478 | Oct 1997 | GB |
2321854 | Jan 1998 | GB |
2323289 | Feb 1998 | GB |
2323290 | Mar 1998 | GB |
2323291 | Mar 1998 | GB |
2323292 | Mar 1998 | GB |
2359996 | Sep 2001 | GB |
10118182 | May 1998 | JP |
10216233 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10263085 | Oct 1998 | JP |
10277156 | Oct 1998 | JP |
10314308 | Dec 1998 | JP |
10323391 | Dec 1998 | JP |
10328303 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11128349 | May 1999 | JP |
11192304 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11206885 | Aug 1999 | JP |
WO 9103207 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO 9107201 | May 1991 | WO |
WO 9112845 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO 9213587 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO 9533506 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9712640 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9712641 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9816273 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9906093 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 0009189 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0022985 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0023135 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0061212 | Oct 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050051175 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |