Patent Grant
7852881
The invention relates to inverse multiplexing within telecommunication, and in particular to inverse multiplexing with TDM Bonding.
For digital transmission with bit rates not available on standards like E1/E2/E3 and T1/T2/T3 a flexible bandwidth can be provided with inverse multiplexing. The aggregate bitstream is split in a cyclic manner into several transmission links (E1/T1) and recombined in the remote end. In cable transmission systems the transmission range will be dependent on line bit rate, as seen with SHDSL, hence an increased transmission range will be possible by inverse multiplexing over multiple lines with lower bit rates. The increased range will reduce the complexity between two inverse multiplexers within the network because of the reduced number of repeaters necessary, further, less complexity/components means less service and maintenance, and hence an increased reliability.
A known solution is inverse multiplexing with ATM bonding. The ATM inverse multiplexing involves multiplexing and demultiplexing of ATM cells in a cyclic fashion among multiple links to form a higher bandwidth.
ATM inverse multiplexing has its basis in ATM networks where each ATM cell has a length of 53 byte with 5-byte header and 48 byte payload. For TDM networks use, the TDM bitstream has to be circuit emulated into an ATM cellstream by ATM circuit emulation.
The serial bitstream is segmented into ATM cells. However, in ATM with circuit emulation (AAL-1) there is a need of 1 extra byte, Sequence Number field (SN) and Sequence Number Protection (SNP), hence ATM CE-cells have the length of 53-bytes including 47 bytes payload and 6 bytes overhead. Filling up the ATM payload with bits from the serial bitstream creates delay. On lower bit rates this delay can be prohibitive. The efficiency ratio for Circuit emulation is poor with an overhead of approximately 12.5%.
To meet the requirements of low transmission delay, a minimized overhead, an increased working range, a reduced number of repeaters, reduced service and maintenance, an increased reliability and robustness, as well as higher availability for the transmission systems, a new and inventive mechanism of inverse multiplexing using TDM bonding is disclosed. Compared to the complexity of ATM the invention has among others the following characteristics:
These and other features will be met by the present invention.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and a system avoiding the above described problems.
The features defined in the independent claims enclosed characterize this method.
In particular, the present invention provides a method and a system within inverse multiplexing, said system comprises one or more network components within a telecommunication network, wherein said network is a serial bitstream network and the network component(s) is/are comprising one or more inverse multiplexers wherein said multiplexer(s) are/is TDM bonding multiplexers. Said method describes a method for inverse multiplexing of one or more serial bitstreams within a telecommunication network wherein said method uses spare bit and/or frame alignment signals from a protocol to:
measure differential delay between transmission lines at the receiving end, and/or
secure timeslot integrity by compensation for individual link delay, and/or
secure correct transmitter and receiver timeslot sequence by link identification, and/or
monitor both end of the channel for availability by block error checking and local and remote alarm indications.
In order to make the invention more readily understandable, the discussion that follows will refer to the accompanying drawing.
The present invention discloses an arrangement and a method for the use of said arrangement, where the arrangement's main feature is its versatility and flexibility within inverse multiplexing and particularly within inverse multiplexing with TDM bonding. In the following a detailed description of the present invention with support in the accompanying drawings is given.
FAS with Basic frame is in accordance with ITU rec. G.704. The Basic frame can be used as a “building block” in a hierarchical system where several basic frames can constitute of parts in a multiframe; a multiframing of 8×2 basic frames is also in line with the G.704. The spare bits in the multiframe are used for the control of the specific functions of the inverse multiplexer in accordance with the present invention. Table 1 shows the structure of the G.704 basic frame.
It is bit number 2 in the table, that decides whether it is a frame alignment signal or not. If this bit is set to 0 (zero) we will have a frame alignment signal.
A basic frame is always 125 μs (
Applying a number of transmission lines between nodes will result in a differential delay between the lines as indicated in
The Sa bit can be utilized as line identification bit to compensate for pair crossing; this is of particular interest where cable systems having short time delay is used. The principle will work for up to 32 lines, in that it is 5 Sa bits available, if pair crossing is detected, this will be compensated for at the receiving end.
Alternatively, the spare bit can be used for sequence numbering forming a multi-multiframe pattern of up to 32 multiframes. A delay compensation of 32×2 mS=64 mS can be achieved. The length of the payload is variable from N=1 and upwards, depending on bit rate, in that a basic frame is 125 μs, if standards are applied, E1 . . . . T1 . . . , the payload will increase step by step depending on the bit rate adapted to these standards. In
The shown c bits in table 2 indicate the checksum.
For the TDM inverse multiplexer, the transmission overhead is limited to 3% compared to the ATM with 12.5%. Transmission delay is kept at a minimum as there are no cells to be filled up. For ATM based inverse multiplexer, the aggregate will be reduced to less than 7.264 Mbit/s.
With reference to
The solution shown in
As shown in the figure, one or more 2.048 Mbit/s TDM bitstreams are transported between two or more nodes, employing the present invention. The bitstream(s) is/are bonded in the block assigned TDM bonding according to the methods depicted in table 1 and 2 and the accompanying text. After the bonding process we will have four lines each with a payload of 512 kbit/s, derived from
2.048 Mbit/s/4=512 kbit/s,
adding to the payload is the FAS of 64 kbit/s resulting in a bit transfer rate of 576 kbit/s per pair of cables and 8 byte payload and 1 byte overhead per frame. ATM inverse multiplexing would have given an overhead to payload ratio of 6/8.
With reference to
(2.048 Mbit/s*125 μs)/8.
The payload is of 31 bytes length, whereas the overhead is of 1 byte length per frame, resulting in a payload transfer rate per line of:
((32−1)*8) bit/125 μs=1.984 Mbit/s.
The overhead ratio is held at a minimum compared to what is the case in traditional solutions; it is given from
(2.048−1.984) Mbit/s/1.984 Mbit/s˜3%.
The aggregate payload bit transfer rate is
4*1.984 Mbit/s=7.936
and the transmission delay is kept at a minimum as there are no cells to be filled up. For ATM Based inverse multiplexer, the aggregate will be reduced to less than 7.264 Mbit/s.
As depicted in
In
The STM-1 multiplexer can be used for combined E1 TDM channels, mapped into VC-12 and for E1 channels forming a transparent high capacity data channel via the inverse multiplexer, also mapped into VC-12.
In
The hybrid solution shown can be expanded to cover signal lines with bit transfer rates different from those shown in this and the previous examples, furthermore solutions employing other virtual containers may be applied, as well as E1/E2/E3 and T1/T2/T3 signals. Wherever the bonding technique described with support in table 1 and 2 is applicable, the present invention will be applicable.
The preferred embodiments above are meant to make the invention more readily understandable. However, wherever TDM signals are applied between a transmitter and a receiving end, and one wishes to reduce the bit rate between the transmitter and the receiver without reducing the overall bandwidth, as long as there are enough spare bits for ?-t handling, the present invention is applicable.
Note that while in the foregoing, a detailed description of particular embodiments of the present invention has been provided, it is to be understood that equivalents are to be included within the scope of the invention as claimed.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/NO03/00298 | 8/27/2003 | WO | 00 | 8/11/2008 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2005/022837 | 3/10/2005 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5515371 | Venters | May 1996 | A |
| 6381243 | Ekstedt | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6717960 | Anesko et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6788686 | Khotimsky et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6928056 | Evans | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7075952 | Torma et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7145908 | Anesko et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7558272 | Meir | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7623541 | Stiegler et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7636358 | Manchester et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 20020122435 | Mundkur et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020122439 | Evans | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020181458 | Amidan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030123476 | Shenoi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030219019 | Wilson | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 98 08355 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080298396 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |
