Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates in general to an inverted-sprinkler system for inverting and elevating water sprinklers. Inversion of the sprinklers, as shown and described herein, means turning the sprinkler upside down and securing it from an elevated position above the ground such that fluid is directed from above to the desired coverage area below, much like natural rainwater. The invention is directed, in particular, to a base and support structure that elevates and inverts an oscillating wave-type sprinkler, a rotary-type sprinkler, a pulsating type sprinkler, an impulse-type sprinkler, and a plurality of other sprinklers for the efficient and uniform distribution, from above, of any fluid that is to be dispensed over a particular surface or coverage area.
2. Prior Art
The effective sprinkler coverage area of residential and commercial irrigation systems is often reduced by growing crops, vines, shrubbery, trees and other natural and man-made obstacles which interfere with the stream of water ejected by the sprinkler. There are any number of commercially available sprinklers utilized in such irrigation systems. Oscillating sprinklers, for example, are commonly used to cover square or rectangular coverage areas. Typical oscillating wave-type sprinklers are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,860,954 issued to Allemann (1989); U.S. Pat. No. 4,252,246 B2 issued to Heren, et al. (1981); U.S. Pat. No. 4,245,786 issued to Abrahamsen (1981); and U.S. Pat. No. D303,283 issued to Best, et al. (1989). Rotary sprinklers are commonly used to cover circular or elliptical coverage areas. Typical rotary sprinklers are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,307,993 issued to Simmonetti (1994) and U.S. Pat. No. D378,399 issued to Simmonetti (1997). Pulsating sprinklers are commonly used to cover circular, angular, or elliptical coverage areas. Typical pulsating sprinklers are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,978,070 issued to Chow (1990). Impulse sprinklers are also commonly used to cover circular, angular, or elliptical coverage areas. Typical impulse sprinklers are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,907,742 issued to Whitehead and Ferguson (1990). Sprinklers are typically positioned on the ground in the center of the sprinkler coverage area. In the case of the oscillating wave-type sprinkler, locking devices are provided to restrict the coverage area by restraining the lateral movement of the sprinkler head, by having a pattern select feature (Heren and Breedlove, U.S. Pat. No. 7,252,246 B2 (2007)) or a sprinkler with perforated spray hose that is selectively flexed to produce a variable water spray pattern (Abrahamsen and Spector, U.S. Pat. No. 4,245,786 (1981)). In the case of pulsating and impulse sprinklers, deflectors are provided to minimize or maximize coverage areas by restraining the rotational limits of the sprinkler head.
A number of devices have been suggested to elevate the sprinkler above the level of the ground in order to allow the stream of water to pass without obstruction over vertical obstacles. Most such devices are sprinkler stands of some form which elevate the sprinkler above ground level to an appropriate height where fluid leaving the sprinkler is no longer blocked.
Inventors have created several types of sprinkler stands to maintain a sprinkler in an elevated position. Adequate for overcoming obstacles which block the delivery of water, these devices nonetheless have limited utility in achieving sprinkler coverage area patterns specific to the need of the residential or commercial gardener and others desiring to use sprinklers to deliver fluid to precise coverage areas.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,824,020 to Harward (1989), for instance, discloses a lightweight vertical support stand for a water sprinkler head. The invention has flexible elongated legs which are pivotally attached to a support hub. This invention is an improvement on earlier stands, such as U.S. Pat. No. 1,959,886 to Wadsworth (1934) and U.S. Pat. No. 2,694,600 to Richey (1954) which taught elevated tripod sprinkler stands with bases of varying stability, weight, and mobility. U.S. Pat. No. 4,884,749 issued to Ruprechter, (1989) teaches a swingable mount which tends to orient the sprinkler on nonlevel ground by the force of gravity. It has the advantage of optimizing sprinkler coverage area on nonlevel ground. Other than addressing the vertical limitations of watering nonlevel ground, however, it does little to overcome more typical vertical obstacles such as shrubs, vines, growing crops, and the like.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,322,027 issued to Hsu (2001) discloses yet another adjustable sprinkler stand, including a sprinkler mount which is supported by three adjustable support rod sets. A principal objective of the device is to elevate the sprinkler by means of the three adjustable support rods which can be set to various heights.
In all of these devices, the primary objective was to vertically elevate a water sprinkler head to reduce interference with the sprinkler coverage area caused by vertical obstacles.
United States Patent Application Publication No. US2007/0051829 A1 (Griffin, Mar. 8, 2007) discloses a stand for an oscillating wave-type sprinkler. The stand holds an oscillating wave-type sprinkler in an elevated and generally vertical orientation to provide desired sprinkler coverages. The device is limited to use with oscillating wave-type sprinklers and does not teach the complete inversion of the sprinkler to achieve the type of direct downward spray coverage areas taught by this invention.
Each of the foregoing inventions suffers from a number of common disadvantages.
a) The primary objective of the devices is limited to maintaining the sprinkler in an elevated position.
b) None of the devices allow for the full inversion of the sprinkler from an elevated position.
c) All of the devices direct the pressure of water leaving the sprinkler up from the surface in some fashion before gravity pulls the stream back toward the ground.
d) None of the devices teach the simultaneous elevation and complete inversion of the sprinkler head to achieve desired fluid coverage from above.
e) None of the devices teach the use of sprinkler stands to direct water leaving the sprinkler directly down to the ground.
f) Not all of the devices are able to achieve uniform and efficient watering because they spray water into the air, where it falls to the ground after the stream reaches its apogee, sometimes blowing beyond the desired coverage area, rather than spraying the water directly from above toward the ground.
g) None of the devices mimic natural rainfall by providing an elevated sprinkler which is inverted such that fluid is directly applied to the coverage area from above.
h) None of the devices have the variety of horizontal, vertical, and angular adjustments as does the present invention.
i) None of the devices allow the elevation and inversion of a plurality of sprinkler types (e.g. wave, rotary, oscillating, pulsating, impulse, etc.).
Accordingly, the clear objects and advantages of the present invention are:
a) To provide an inverted-sprinkler system which simultaneously elevates and inverts the sprinkler to achieve desired fluid coverage areas.
b) To provide a vertical support member, adjustable in length, to elevate a horizontal support member, also adjustable in length, upon which a sprinkler base is attached for sprinkler inversion.
c) To provide for desired irrigation coverage areas by inverting a plurality of sprinkler types for direct fluid application from above.
d) To provide for portability and stability of the system by means of a plurality of support bases.
e) To provide for the adjustment of the vertical height and horizontal reach of the sprinkler base support by means of telescopic adjustment.
f) To provide for the adjustment of the angle between the vertical support member and horizontal support member by means of a slanted support member with telescopic adjustment.
g) To provide a sprinkler base support with fastening means for the inverted support of a plurality of sprinklers.
h) To provide for the further fine adjustments of the vertical and horizontal support members by means of rotational movement of each support member along its axis.
i) To provide for the further fine adjustment of the angle of the sprinkler support base to the horizontal support member by means of adjustment screws.
j) To couple the invention to a hose timer to facilitate automatic dispensing of fluid.
Further objects and advantages are to provide an inverted-sprinkler system which can be used easily and conveniently to irrigate residential and commercial lawns, gardens, row crops, greenhouses, nurseries, and the like; to allow for the quick and portable transport and movement of the vertical sprinkler system; to save watering time; to conserve water use through direct application; to easily remove, disassemble and store the system; to allow for the precise application of fluids to the desired sprinkler coverage area; to mimic natural rainfall by delivering water from an elevated source; to achieve uniform and rain-like watering of plants; and to function in outdoor and indoor settings.
In accordance with the present invention an inverted-sprinkler system comprising an adjustable vertical support member secured to a sprinkler system base, said vertical support member able to rotate axially; an adjustable horizontal support member, also able to rotate axially; said vertical and horizontal support members pivoting about a pin to form a right angle; a slanted support member attached to the horizontal and vertical support members near the pivot pin to allow for the adjustment of the angle between said horizontal and vertical support members; a sprinkler support base attached to the distal end of said horizontal support member to secure and permit the inversion of a plurality of sprinklers, the angle of said sprinkler support base to the horizontal support member being adjustable; for the direct and elevated application of water and other fluids (e.g. fertilizer, herbicide) to the desired sprinkler coverage area.
FIG. 1—Shows an isometric view of inverted-sprinkler system: base and support.
FIG. 2—Shows an exploded isometric view of inverted-sprinkler system: base and support.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
The inverted-sprinkler system depicted is constructed of durable and lightweight material. In its preferred embodiment, the inverted-sprinkler system is made of hard plastic. However, it can consist of any other durable and lightweight material suited for fabrication into a weather-proof stand, including aluminum, lightweight metal alloys, fiberglass, or laminates. In its preferred embodiment, the inverted-sprinkler system is comprised of vertical and horizontal support members through which residential or commercial hose is internally contained. Alternatively, the hose may be externally supported by the vertical and horizontal support members.
As shown in the preferred embodiment, the proximal end of the vertical support member 1 (
An adjustable horizontal support member 5A (
The adjustable horizontal support member 5A (
Affixed to the distal end of the horizontal support member is a sprinkler support base 9 (
In an alternate embodiment, the sprinkler support base 9 (
Advantages
From the description above, a number of advantages of the inverted-sprinkler system become evident:
a) The system is. compact and portable.
b) The system allows both commercial and amateur horticulturalists to quickly set up an elevated irrigation system to achieve direct watering or application of other fluids from above the coverage area.
c) The system allows a user to adjust the elevation and angular orientation of the system to increase or decrease coverage area and watering intensity.
d) The system allows a user to adjust the angle of the horizontal support member to assure uniform application rates in circumstances such as irrigating non-level surfaces.
e) The system allows for the complete inversion of a plurality of sprinklers such that irrigation is uniform and natural (like rain).
f) The base allows for easy movement and relocation of the system.
g) The angle between the sprinkler support base and the horizontal support member may be finely adjusted to create exactly and uniform sprinkler coverage areas.
h) The vertical and horizontal support members may be lengthened or shortened as needed. This feature allows the system to be located just above the desired coverage area thereby reducing wind drift of fluid during sprinkling.
i) The vertical and horizontal support members may be rotated axially as needed.
j) The system allows a user to make further adjustments using the locking and deflecting mechanisms indigenous to the type of sprinkler being inverted (e. g. wave-type, impulse-type, and pulsating-type).
h) Fluid pressure may be varied to adjust the flow rate and coverage area.
Although the description above contains many specifications, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, but merely as providing illustrations of preferred embodiments of this invention. For example, the system can have many dimensions; the support members and base members can be made of aluminum, lightweight metal, alloys, fiberglass or laminates; the interior hose can be eliminated and a garden house secured to the vertical and horizontal members with exterior fasteners; the support members may take shapes other than cylindrical; the sprinkler support base may take shapes other than rectangular; all types of sprinklers may be inverted; the telescopic member locking devices may be replaced with other types of locking devices (e. g. slides and fasteners); the telescopic member locking devices may be fixed to certain heights and lengths; the sprinkler support base may be affixed in tandem to counterpart frames, each having an adjustable horizontal support member, a base support member, an adjustable slanted support member, and a sprinkler support base to give the system additional support, a reduced propensity to tip, and wider areas of coverage; the tandem counterpart frame embodiment may be utilized to affix more than one sprinkler support base; the sprinkler support base may be eliminated and a plurality of sprinklers (e.g. wave, rotary, oscillating, impulse, etc.) may be inverted and secured from the distal end of the adjustable horizontal support member by other fastening means (e. g. a coupler to thread said plurality of sprinkler directly to said distal end) as shown in
PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATION NO. 60849339 FILED: Oct. 4, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
180007 | Copping | Jul 1876 | A |
539657 | Van Horn et al. | May 1895 | A |
872469 | Snell | Dec 1907 | A |
912894 | Ryan | Feb 1909 | A |
973810 | Regan | Oct 1910 | A |
1512581 | Deming | Oct 1924 | A |
1959886 | Wadsworth | May 1934 | A |
2590400 | Gollnick | Mar 1952 | A |
2694600 | Richey | Nov 1954 | A |
2852307 | Clark | Sep 1958 | A |
2986364 | Vestal | May 1961 | A |
2997242 | Grosholz | Aug 1961 | A |
3113723 | Arnt | Dec 1963 | A |
3286927 | Zysk | Nov 1966 | A |
3915382 | Davis | Oct 1975 | A |
4245786 | Abrahamsen et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4529156 | Heuer | Jul 1985 | A |
4824020 | Harward | Apr 1989 | A |
4860954 | Allemann | Aug 1989 | A |
D303283 | Best et al. | Sep 1989 | S |
4884749 | Ruprechter | Dec 1989 | A |
4907742 | Whitehead et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4978070 | Chow | Dec 1990 | A |
5307993 | Simonetti et al. | May 1994 | A |
D378399 | Simonetti et al. | Mar 1997 | S |
5836516 | Van Epps et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6322027 | Hsu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
7252246 | Heren et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20030062424 | McKinney et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040188540 | Mills | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20070051829 | Griffin | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080083839 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60849339 | Oct 2006 | US |