The present invention relates generally to stackable concrete blocks and more particularly to concrete blocks which may be stacked with a base course in an inverted configuration.
Concrete blocks for free standing and retaining walls have been known and used for many years. They can be both functional and decorative, and range from small gardening applications to large-scale construction projects. Such walls are typically used to form horizontal surfaces or terraces by providing a generally vertical barrier behind which backfill may be deposited. Such walls reduce erosion and slumping and maximize land use.
Walls can be constructed from stackable concrete blocks. Blocks are stacked in horizontal rows called courses. Multiple successive courses may be used to create a vertically rising wall of a desired height. These types of blocks can generally be assembled quickly and economically due to the interlocking of adjacent courses of blocks. Typically, each block includes some type of interlocking system such as pins, lips or projections so that one course of blocks interlocks with an adjacent course of blocks to create a stable structure. These features are often located on the bottom surfaces of the blocks and project downward into an opening in a lower course of blocks because if the projections are on the top surface of the blocks the wall will require specially manufactured cap blocks. This, however, can cause problems with the first course of blocks because it is laid directly upon the base surface so there is no open area for the interlocking features to rest in. In order to create a level base course, builders often have to excavate material from the base surface. This process often makes the base course the most difficult and time consuming course to build. Alternatively, blocks manufactured without projections can be used in the base course. This, however, requires having two different types of blocks on hand which increases the cost and complexity of stacking, manufacturing, storing, and palletizing the blocks.
The present invention addresses the need to provide for a block design that can form a base and subsequent courses without the need for separate base blocks or provision of relief in the base surface. Such invertible retaining wall block comprises a front portion, a rear portion and a neck portion connecting the front portion and rear portion. A projection extends outwardly from the block to interlock with similar blocks in adjacent courses of blocks. One or more notches are provided to the front portion in order to allow the base course of blocks to be placed in an inverted orientation with respect to subsequent courses because the notch provides clearance for the protrusion.
Referring to
Front portion 102 comprises a front surface 108 and opposing rearwardly facing or rear-facing inner surface 110 on the rear side 111 of the front portion 102, a top surface 112 and opposing bottom surface 114 and opposing first 116 and second 118 side surfaces. Rear portion 104 comprises a rear surface 120 and opposing forward-facing inner surface 122, a top surface and 124 and opposing bottom 126 surface, and opposing first 125 and second 127 side surfaces. The neck portion 106 extends between the inner surfaces 110 and 122 of front portion 102 and rear portion 104 and includes a top surface 134 and opposing bottom surface 154 and first 138 and second 140 side surfaces. As shown in
Front surface 108 of front portion 102 may be given a decorative appearance. Such decorative appearances include broken rock, stacked rocks, natural stone, brick, striated or roughened texture. Persons of skill in the art will recognize that the present invention is not limited to a specific decorative facial appearance unless specifically indicated in a given Claim. Alternatively, some or all of front surface 108 may be provided with a smooth appearance.
Invertible block 100 further includes a projection 121 extending outwardly from the block opposite of block top surface 142. Projection 121 comprises an interlocking portion 128 and a spacing portion 130. Interlocking portion 128 includes a front surface 146 and opposing rear surface 148, opposing first 150 and second 152 side surfaces, and an indexing surface 154. Indexing surface 154 may comprise some or all of the same surface as neck portion bottom surface. Side surfaces 150, 152 extend only partway along the length of top surface, until intersecting with side surfaces 138, 140 of neck portion. Front surface 146 of interlocking portion 128 is generally perpendicular in order to facilitate the interlocking of adjacent blocks. Rear surface 148 and side surfaces 150, 152 may be at an angle to make projection 121 easier to manufacture. Interlocking portion 128 may be generally rectangular, square, triangular, trapezoidal, or any other similar shape.
Spacing portion 130 extends outwardly from rear surface 148 of interlocking portion 128 and outwardly opposite of block top surface 142. Spacing portion 130 comprises a tail portion 129 and a tapered neck portion 131. A projection 121 formed of an integral interlocking portion 128 and spacing portion 130 increases the strength and chipping resistance of the projection 121. Although one specific spacing portion 130 configuration is depicted, one of skill in the art will recognize that spacing portion 130 may take on a variety of configurations, for example, neck portion 131 may not taper, linearly taper, taper in the opposite direction, or be eliminated. Spacing projection 130 has dual functions, one of which is to position the block when it is placed on a lower course of blocks that are arranged in a convex course, the other of which is to facilitate stacking on a pallet for shipping.
Invertible block 100 also includes first and second notched portions 132, 133 defined in front portion 102. Notched portions 132, 133 each include a stop surface 135 and extend inward from front portion inner surface 110 and downward from front portion bottom surface 114. Notched portions 132, 133 are located on each side of neck portion 106 and may extend laterally from front portion side surfaces 116 and 118 to interlocking portion side surfaces 150 and 152. The depth of notched portions 135 from bottom surface 114 of front portion 102 is preferably greater than, but at least equal to, the distance that interlocking portion 128 extends outward opposite of block top surface 142. Notched portions 132, 133 may define a curve, a right angle, or any other angle. As will be described more fully below, notched portions 132 allow invertible blocks 100 to be stacked with an inverted base course.
Referring now to
Blocks 100a in the base course 156 are laid upside down, with the top surface 142a of each base block 100a contacting the ground or other base surface. Consequently, the interlocking portion 128a and spacing portion 130a of each projection 129a of each base block 100a extend upwardly from each block 100a. It is therefore unnecessary to dig a recess in the base surface to create a level base course.
The second course 158 of blocks 100b is then placed on top of the first course 156 in the usual orientation, with the bottom surface 144 of the blocks facing downward. Each block 100b in the second course is centered above two base blocks 100a. Stop surfaces 135b of notched portions 132b, 133b of the blocks 100b in the second course 158 may rest upon the indexing surfaces 154a of interlocking portions 128a of projections 129a of base blocks 100a. In addition, indexing surfaces of interlocking portions of the blocks in the second course may rest upon stop surfaces of notched portions in base blocks. Because the depth of notched portions is greater than or equal to the height of interlocking portions, bottom surfaces of front and rear portions of the second course 158 rest flush against bottom surfaces of front and rear portions of first course 156. Spacing portions 130b in the second course 158 of blocks rest between rear portion side surfaces 125a and 127a of each pair of base blocks 100a.
When two courses of blocks are inverted and placed on each other, the outermost sections of the front portion 102b of each block 100b in the second course 158 are aligned with the interlocking portions 128a projecting outward from the top surface 102a of the blocks 100a in the first course 156, which would ordinarily cause the second course 158 to rest unevenly on the first course 156. However, the addition of notched portions 132b, 133b greater than or equal to the height of the interlocking portions 128a to receive the interlocking portions 128a allows the second course to rest flush on the first course. Notched portions in base blocks that are aligned with the portion of interlocking portions of the blocks in the second course that would otherwise rest upon bottom surface of base block front portions further prevent blocks from resting unevenly on each other. Blocks of this design therefore allow the base course 156 to be placed upside down, with the projections 129a projecting upwardly, which eliminates the need either to dig up a portion of the base surface to accommodate projections or to use a projectionless base course of blocks.
The third course 160 of blocks 100c, and subsequent courses, can then be added in the same orientation as the second course 158. Projections 129c of the blocks 100c in the third course 160 rest against the front portion inner surfaces 110b of the second course of blocks. This prevents forward movement of each new course of blocks and also creates a setback between adjacent courses.
In order for blocks to align properly such that a block in an overlying course rests between two blocks in an underlying course, block courses must be shifted by half of a block relative to one another. This is commonly referred to as a running bond. Accordingly, half-blocks having a notched portion can be utilized to provide this offset and, where necessary, to present a finished appearance to ends of walls where necessary. Such half-blocks as well as quarter-blocks, corner blocks, cap blocks and other block variations can be provided by slight variations to the basic block design, as is known in the art. Due to the generally planar nature of top surface of invertible blocks, conventional cap blocks having a flat bottom surface can be used.
Because rear portion 104 is narrower in width that front portion 102, blocks may be oriented at oblique angles to one another to create curved or serpentine walls. Due to this size difference, rear portions 104 of adjacent angled blocks do not interfere with one another even when blocks are angled towards one another.
A wall 163 formed of invertible blocks 100A-100E is shown in
Blocks of the present invention are preferably made from a rugged, weather resistant material, such as zero-slump concrete, for high strength and durability in outdoor applications. However, blocks may be made of numerous other materials, for example, plastic, fiberglass, wood, metal, or stone. Blocks are most preferably manufactured in a high-speed application using the so called dry-cast manufacturing method known in the art. The material composition for such process generally comprises sand, aggregate, cement, fly ash and, optionally, selected admixtures. Persons having skill in the art of dry-cast concrete block manufacture understand that material mixtures can be varied to meet a variety of performance requirements.
Persons of skill in the art will recognize that by providing a block design that can be manufactured with at least one of a flat top or bottom surface, the manufacturing process can be performed more easily, quickly and inexpensively using dry-cast manufacturing methods, when compared to designs that do not have at least one of a flat top or bottom surface. These advantages are due, at least in part, to the fact that core pulling need not be performed to form relief in the block surface opposite the compression head.
Referring now to
A retaining wall block 400 according to another embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Referring now to
The present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments. However, particular features of each of the exemplary embodiments may be mixed and matched with the features of any other embodiment, depending on the demands of the particular situation in which the block is to be used, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Design Patent Application No. 29/240,236, filed Oct. 11, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. D,547,881 U.S. Design Patent Application No. 29/240,237, filed Oct. 11, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. D,548,365 U.S. Design Patent Application No. 29/240,278, filed Oct. 11, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. D,546,972 and U.S. Design Patent Application No. 29/240,296, filed Oct. 11, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. D,555,808 all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
751346 | Schall | Feb 1904 | A |
1526730 | Zottoli | Feb 1925 | A |
1727362 | Bone | Sep 1929 | A |
4123881 | Muse | Nov 1978 | A |
4470728 | Broadbent | Sep 1984 | A |
4592678 | McNinch, Jr. et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4802320 | Forsberg | Feb 1989 | A |
4909010 | Gravier | Mar 1990 | A |
4914876 | Forsberg | Apr 1990 | A |
4920712 | Dean, Jr. | May 1990 | A |
D317048 | Forsberg | May 1991 | S |
5044834 | Janopaul, Jr. | Sep 1991 | A |
5064313 | Risi et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5145288 | Borcherdt | Sep 1992 | A |
5163261 | O'Neill | Nov 1992 | A |
5337527 | Wagenaar | Aug 1994 | A |
5474405 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484235 | Hilfiker et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490363 | Woolford | Feb 1996 | A |
5505034 | Dueck | Apr 1996 | A |
5511910 | Scales | Apr 1996 | A |
5540525 | Miller et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5551809 | Forsberg | Sep 1996 | A |
5653558 | Price | Aug 1997 | A |
5673530 | Bailey, II | Oct 1997 | A |
5704183 | Woolford | Jan 1998 | A |
5709062 | Woolford | Jan 1998 | A |
5711129 | Woolford | Jan 1998 | A |
5795105 | Guth | Aug 1998 | A |
5823709 | Maher et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827015 | Woolford et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
D405543 | Shillingburg | Feb 1999 | S |
5913790 | Dawson | Jun 1999 | A |
6019550 | Wrigley et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6113318 | Guth | Sep 2000 | A |
6168353 | Price | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6168354 | Martin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
RE37278 | Forsberg | Jul 2001 | E |
6336773 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
D459487 | Bott | Jun 2002 | S |
6474036 | Martin et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6536994 | Race | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6622445 | Shillingburg et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6641334 | Woolford | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651401 | Price et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652197 | Shaw | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6701687 | Shillingburg | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6792731 | Bott et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
D497399 | May et al. | Oct 2004 | S |
D501935 | Dawson et al. | Feb 2005 | S |
D508739 | Shillingburg | Aug 2005 | S |
D509911 | Shillingburg | Sep 2005 | S |
7096635 | Price et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
D530832 | Rainey | Oct 2006 | S |
20050016106 | Dawson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
54107105 | Aug 1979 | JP |
54107106 | Aug 1979 | JP |
59-167842 | Nov 1984 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070094991 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 29240236 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 11400923 | US | |
Parent | 29240237 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 29240236 | US | |
Parent | 29240278 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 29240237 | US | |
Parent | 29240296 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 29240278 | US |