Patent Application
20070135736
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to medical diagnostic tests and, more specifically, to a diagnostic test for evaluating a neurological deficiency in a patient by inducing an involuntary abdominal contraction and obtaining a measurement of pressure generated by the involuntary contraction.
2. Description of the Prior Art
People may experience many different types of neurological deficiencies. One common type, for example, is the iatrogenic neurological deficiency caused by general anesthesia. Another example includes urinary incontinence, where a patient loses either complete or partial bladder control due to nerve damage of some sort. Still another example, may be the stroke victim who has lost muscle strength and tone along one side of the body, consequently being unable to contract at least half the muscles which help produce a cough forceful enough to properly clear the respiratory airways.
For example, a patient experiencing urinary incontinence must be properly diagnosed to identify the specific type of incontinence from which the patient suffers. The treatments may be different, depending on the type of incontinence. Therefore, proper diagnosis becomes important at least for that reason.
Stress incontinence is a condition believed to result primarily in older women due to loss of extrinsic support for the pelvic organs and for the neck of the bladder. The tissues of the pelvis and of the distal urethra contain estrogen and progesterone receptors. Following menopause and decrease of the hormones, the tissues of the urethra may lose resiliency and become somewhat flaccid. Under those conditions, any increase in intra-abdominal pressure causes urine in the bladder to be pushed outwardly as resistance in the urethra is overcome, resulting in, leakage of urine. This condition is known as stress incontinence and occurs in the absence of contractions by the detrusor muscle of the bladder. Stress incontinence may be responsive to treatment with exogenous estrogens, although this is not an effective treatment for all patients, particularly depending on age. Alternative treatments may include pelvic muscle exercises, a-adrenergic agents, such as phenylpropanolamine, that act on the a-adrenergic receptors along the urethra and increase urethral tone.
The most common cause of urinary incontinence, however, is detrusor hyperreflexia, or hyperactivity of the detrusor muscle. This type of incontinence is believed to result from lack of inhibition of the detrusor muscle due to a decreased detrusor reflex in the brain stem. Nevertheless, in most affected elderly there appears to be no underlying neurological defect. In this condition, treatment may include antispasmodic agents which tend to relax the wall of the bladder.
A typical test employed to distinguish these two types of urinary incontinence is one which increases intra-abdominal pressure so as to, in turn, put pressure on the bladder. The Valsalva maneuver is one such test. This procedure is named after Antonio M. Valsalva, an Italian anatomist of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. In this technique, the patient generates a muscular contraction of the chest, abdomen and diaphragm in a forced expiration against a closed glottis. This increases pressure within the thoracic cavity and also in the abdominal cavity. The Valsalva maneuver also refers to raising the pressure in the nasopharynx by a forced expiration with the mouth closed and the nostrils pinched, for example, to clear the patency of the Eustachian tubes. Other testing techniques involve having the patient jump up and down to jostle the bladder, or bend down so as to compress the abdomen. Yet another method involves having the patient generate one or more strong voluntary coughs.
It is known, however, that some patients are unable to perform these physical acts. For example, a patient may not be able to jump, or to bend, or to generate a strong voluntary cough. Additionally, there are some patients who will not be correctly diagnosed on the basis of the cough test, perhaps because their coughs are insufficiently strong. Accordingly, there is a need for alternative or supplementary tests that will aid in diagnosing urinary stress incontinence.
As noted above, however, other clinical diagnostic tests also rely on the patient's ability to generate a forceful volitional abdominal contraction or Valsalva maneuver as an identifier of normal neurological and/or muscular function. Many patients, however, are unable to produce a forceful voluntary abdominal contraction or voluntary Valsalva maneuver and the associated diagnosis may be hampered or missed altogether.
A rather complete discussion of methods of evaluating urinary incontinence is found in a February 2006 article by J L Martin et al. entitled “Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence (hereinafter referred to as Systematic review).”
3. Problems of the Prior Art
One of the problems associated with the prior art techniques is that some patient's are unable or are unwilling to perform the physical acts to the extent needed. For example, a patient may not be able to jump, or to bend, or to generate a strong voluntary cough. For some patient's they maybe able to perform these acts, but be unwilling to do so because, in the use of stress incontinence, an involuntary release of urine maybe embarrassing or contrary to what is considered proper in society.
Various aspects of the invention are directed toward apparatus and techniques for evaluating neurological deficiency, such as iatrogenic neurological deficiency caused by general anesthesia, urinary incontinence (full or partial) caused by nerve damage, or loss of muscular control caused by stroke.
The present invention seeks to provide a clinical test which depends neither on the patient's ability to generate a forceful volitional abdominal contraction or Valsalva maneuver nor on personal observation by the physician to make the diagnosis. The method of the invention includes positioning a pressure transducer in a patient being evaluated, inducing an involuntary abdominal contraction. In one embodiment of the present invention, the involuntary contraction may be initiated through induction of an involuntary cough by any suitable means. For example, a chemoirritant may be introduced into the patient's upper airway. Mechanical stimulation may be employed, for example, by use of an endoscope. Other stimuli may also be employed, for example, electrical stimulation of the abdominal muscles to produce an involuntary Valsalva maneuver, etc.
The skilled will recognize that the induction of an involuntary cough is but one method of generating an involuntary abdominal contraction and that the invention is not limited to any one specific method of doing so. It is important, however, that the contraction be an involuntary response that does not require the patient's volitional cooperation. Additionally, it is also important that the pressure generated by the involuntary abdominal contraction be measured. The skilled will further understand that such a pressure measurement may be obtained by any one of a variety of devices and processes, most typically by a pressure transducer, although the invention is not intended to be limited to such.
As noted, one approach to generating the involuntary abdominal contraction, or Valsalva maneuver, would be by having the patient breathe an aerosol containing a chemoirritant agent effective for causing the involuntary cough and obtaining a measure of the pressure generated by the involuntary cough. Placement of the transducer in the body of the patient will depend on the specific neurological deficit being evaluated. The transducer may be placed intrarectally, for example. The agent effective for inducing an involuntary cough may be any one of several known to the skilled, for example, tartaric acid, capsaicin, citric acid, saline, distilled water, powders of various types, and others. Whatever the method of induction, whether involuntary chemoirritant induced cough, eletrical stimulus, mechanical stimulation, because the contraction produced is involuntary, any uncertainty as to the degree of patient cooperation is eliminated. Further, since patient cooperation in producing a involuntary contraction is not needed, the test may be applied to patients who may be under sedation, for example, a patient who may have had a spinal anesthetic. Similarly, a patient who has had a stroke and who has lost volitional muscle control on one side of the body will still be able to produce an involuntary abdominal contraction, for example, an involuntary cough, albeit having a lower expiratory pressure.
The pressure produced by the involuntary abdominal contraction will be sensed by a pressure transducer placed in the patient's body and provides a quantitative, non-subjective measure by which the patient's condition may be determined. A population of healthy, non-smoking, normal individuals would be expected to produce a range of involuntary contraction-induced pressures displaying the typical bell-shaped curve. It is also predicted that there will probably be one normal curve or range for males and a slightly different normal curve or range for females.
Comparing the involuntary contraction-induced pressure generated by a patient to the normal distribution, it would be possible to classify the patient to be either within the normal range or outside the normal range and this could be done with a large degree of certainty based on objectively measured pressures, rather than more subjectively based on skilled observation.
The presently described diagnostic test could be used to quantify loss of function or, conversely, return of function following a loss. For example, in a stroke patient, measurement of the involuntary contraction-induced pressure could be used to monitor the return of muscle tonicity and control during recovery. Expiratory pressure readings would be indicative of whether the patient has sufficient ability to clear the airway and, consequently, whether the patient is recovering or whether the patient requires continued ventilatory assistance.
In another example, the presently described test could be applied to a patient undergoing surgery for strengthening the support of the neck of the bladder so as to correct urinary incontinence. The patient would most likely have received a spinal anesthetic but may not be easily able to produce a voluntary cough while on the operating table so as to test the effectiveness of the repair. The patient could be administered a cough-inducing inhalant while the intrarectal pressure is monitored. The pressure reading would indicate whether a normal pressure was reached during the cough and the surgeon could monitor whether there was bladder leakage during the cough. Leakage occurring during an induced cough generating normal pressure would definitely indicate that the repair has not been effective. The surgeon would then have the opportunity of realigning the repair in order to make it effective, this with the patient still on the surgical table.
The patient is then asked to voluntarily cough (120) and the results of the voluntary cough are recorded (130) by recording the variations in pressure as a function of time and by recording whether or not the cough induced involuntary expulsion of urine. See item 130.
Then, a reflex cough test is performed (140) and the results are recorded in a manner substantially similar to step 130. Details of the reflex cough tests are discussed more in conjunction with
The present invention has been described above, in which description preferred embodiments of the invention are discussed. Unless otherwise defined, technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, suitable methods and materials are described above. In addition, the materials, methods and examples given are illustrative in nature only and not intended to be limiting. Accordingly, this invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the illustrated embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these illustrated embodiments are provided solely for exemplary purposes so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the above detailed description, and from the claims.
This application claims priority to and incorporates by reference in its entirety U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/748,892, filed Dec. 9, 2005, entitled Involuntary Contraction-Induced Pressure as a Medical Tool by inventor W. Robert Addington and Robert Stephens, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60748892 | Dec 2005 | US |
