This disclosure relates in general to the field of photovoltaics and solar cells, and more particularly to methods for manufacturing thin-film solar cells (TFSCs). More particularly, the present disclosure provides ion implantation applications for manufacturing Thin-Film Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells (TFSC).
Ion implantation involves implantation of ions of certain elements into a solid and is a standard technique used in the fabrication of semiconductor devices. The implantation of dopant atoms such as phosphorous (P), arsenic (As), and boron (B) are used to form semiconductor P/N junctions, while the implantation of oxygen is used in silicon-on-oxide (SOI) devices. In current manufacturing methods for thin-film crystalline silicon solar cell (TFSC), either planar or three dimensional cells, the p-n junctions are often formed by either POCl3-based doping, or a phosphorous compound deposition or spray-on followed by annealing. Additionally for thin film crystalline silicon (c-Si) substrates obtained using epitaxial deposition the emitter may be formed is-situ by depositing a highly doped surface layer of desired doping type, either P or N.
There are reports of utilizing ion implantation of P and B for forming emitters in a p-type or n-type silicon substrate, respectively followed by a suitable annealing treatment to form a solar cell. However, these ion implantation efforts have been limited to planar, thick c-Si wafers (typically ≧200 um).
High efficiency c-Si solar cells have been made on very thin wafers, down to 45 um, by thinning down the conventional c-Si wafers from bulk silicon ingots or bricks, using integrated circuits (IC) packaging techniques such as chemical mechanical polishing. However, this approach is not practical because of the high cost. Crystalline Silicon (C-Si) Thin-Film Solar Cells (TFSC), of thickness less than 150 um may be advantageously made by depositing a thin layer of c-Si on a suitable substrate or by slicing a c-Si ingot into thin wafers using advanced wire sawing or other known techniques such as hydrogen implantation followed by annealing to cause thin wafer separation.
Often, high performance thin-film silicon substrates (TFSS) are made by depositing an epitaxial crystalline silicon layer according to chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process. Solar cells created in this epitaxial silicon deposition method may be planar or have a well defined structure. Although, in principle, any three-dimensional surface structure is possible for 3-D cells, various performance limitations make certain 3-D structures more advantageous—such as pyramidal or prism based three-dimensional crystalline silicon structures.
The current standard technique for the formation of selective emitters involves several steps. Usually, the full front surface of a p-type wafer is lightly doped using the POCl3 based process or a process involving spraying a phosphorous-compound followed by anneal. Then a passivating dielectric is deposited on the front surface of the silicon substrate. The regions that are desired to be metallization contacts are then selectively opened in this dielectric, usually by a laser ablation or an etch gel process. A second doping process is then carried out to selectively dope these localized regions with a high concentration of phosphorous. However, this process is often lengthy, costly, and inefficient.
When forming homogeneous emitter layers on a TFSS, controlling the dopant profile may provide higher efficiency. To maximize current collection from the solar cell, a good ‘blue response’ is required. This requires the maximum phosphorous content near the surface to not exceed 1E21 cm-3 and the depth of the highly phosphorous doped region to be low, preferably 0.1 um or less and the total depth of the phosphorous doped region to be preferably in the range of 0.3 to 0.5 um. Because of this, there is a growing need in the solar industry for shallow emitters. However, the current industrial emitter formation processes, such as POCl3-based doping, phosphosilicate (PSG) deposition, or phosphoric acid spray-on followed by in-line anneal, do not provide control of the phosphorous concentration and depth independently. Thus, the emitter characteristics are solely determined by the temperature and time used for the doping anneal. This method does not provide good control of the dopant profile for the emitter.
Further, the lifetime of minority charge carriers is greatly reduced at concentrations above 1E18 cm-3. For maximum blue response this would appear to be the upper limit of the dopant concentration in the emitter. However, this would lead to very high emitter sheet resistance and high series resistance and low fill factor (FF) and low current density (Jsc). Therefore, a thin higher doped region near the surface is desired. However, current dopant profile controlling methodology is limited in controlling the thickness of this highly doped region.
Therefore a need has arisen for a simplified manufacturing method for forming a thin-film crystalline silicon solar cell. The method must include improved methods for forming emitter regions, base regions, and back/front surface fields in shallow surface regions of thin-film crystalline silicon solar cells.
In accordance with the disclosed subject matter, applications of ion implantation in the manufacturing of thin-film crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells are provided that substantially reduce disadvantages of prior art methods.
A front contact thin-film solar cell is formed on a thin-film crystalline silicon substrate. Emitter regions, selective emitter regions, and a back surface field are formed through ion implantation processes. In yet another embodiment, a back contact thin-film solar cell is formed on a thin-film silicon substrate. Emitter regions, selective emitter regions, base regions, and a front surface field are formed through ion implantation processes.
In yet another embodiment, three-dimensional thin-film crystalline silicon substrates are used to form three-dimensional thin-film crystalline silicon solar cells. The three-dimensional structure of the substrates is utilized to obtain selective doping (selective emitter) using implants that are either normal to the plane of the TFSC, or are angled. The ion implantation is used to make variable conductivity emitter junction regions in 3D TFSC solar cells for the purpose of self-aligned selective emitter fabrication.
Alternatively, ion implantation is used to make homogeneous emitters in front contacted in TFSC. The ion implantation is used to independently control the dopant concentration and the dopant depth, i.e., profile engineering of emitter to maximize the solar cell performance.
The ion implantation is used to make homogeneous back surface field (BSF) in front contacted cells. The three dimensional structure of the cells is again utilized to obtain selective doping (for point contacts) using implants that are either normal to the plane of the TFSC or are angled.
Technical advantages of the disclosed method include improving the surface passivation by suitably charging the overlying dielectric using ion implantation The negative charge of the films in contact with boron doped surfaces can be improved by doping them with boron to improve surface passivation.
Further, the disclosed ion implantation methods may be used to selectively retard oxidation to obtain localized non-oxidized regions for metal point contacts on the back side of the TFSC.
Additionally, the ion implantation applications disclosed may be used to make solar cells with the standard configuration (known as a front contact solar cell) of contacts on the front and back surface of the cell, or the an alternative configuration (known as a back contact solar cell) where all the contacts are on the backside of the solar cells. Back contact solar cells may be best designed as inter-digitated back contact solar cells.
These and other advantages of the disclosed subject matter, as well as additional novel features, will be apparent from the description provided herein. The intent of this summary is not to be a comprehensive description of the subject matter, but rather to provide a short overview of some of the subject matter's functionality. Other systems, methods, features and advantages here provided will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following FIGURES and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages included within this description, be within the scope of the claims of subsequently filed applications based on this provisional.
The features, nature, and advantages of the disclosed subject matter will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made for the purpose of describing the general principles of the present disclosure. The scope of the present disclosure should be determined with reference to the claims. And although described with reference to the manufacture of planar thin-film solar cells and three-dimensional thin-film solar cells with pyramidal and prism surface features, a person skilled in the art could apply the principles discussed herein to the manufacture of all structural types of thin-film solar cells.
Although described with reference to specific embodiments, one skilled in the art could apply the principles discussed herein to other areas and/or embodiments. A preferred semiconductor material for the 3-D TFSS is crystalline silicon (c-Si), although other semiconductor materials may also be used. One embodiment uses monocrystalline silicon as the thin film semiconductor material. Other embodiments use multicrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, and/or a combination thereof. The designs here are also applicable to other semiconductor materials including but not limited to germanium, silicon germanium, silicon carbide, a crystalline compound semiconductor, or a combination thereof. Additional applications include copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) and cadmium telluride semiconductor thin films.
Further, in this application the term “front” and “back” are used to refer to the surface facing the incoming photons and away from the photons, respectively. A front contact solar cell, or frontside contact, is one that has metal contacts on the solar cell side facing towards the light. A back contact solar cell, or backside contact, is one where all the metal contacts are on the solar cell side facing away from the light. It should be noted that the so called “front contact” cells have metal contacts on back also.
Although the disclosure describes phosphorous ion implantation to form emitters and born implantation to form BSFs for p-type TFSCs, the same principles apply to B implantation to form emitters and P implantation to form BSFs for n-type TFSCs.
Although the disclosure has typically described P and B implantation for n and p doping, respectively, other elements such as As and Sb may be used for n doping, and Al, Ga, In, may be used for p doping.
Those with skill in the arts will recognize that the disclosed embodiments have relevance to a wide variety of areas in addition to those specific examples described below.
The present disclosure describes the use of ion implantation technique in the manufacture of 3-dimensional thin-film crystalline silicon solar cells (TFSC), including those with pyramidal and prism unit cell structures. The present disclosure also describes the use of ion implantation technique in the manufacture of planar thin film crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells (TFSC). The present disclosure describes the use of ion implantation to form emitter regions, selective emitter regions, base regions, back surface fields, and front surface fields in a TFSC and the application of ion implantation methods to form the p-n junction for TFSC.
Further, the present disclosure enables the use of ion implantation to independently control the dopant concentration and the dopant depth for emitter. The dopant profile control, sometimes referred to as profile engineering of emitters, is used to maximize the solar cell performance including but not limited to blue response, Voc, and current collection.
One method for forming planar or three-dimensional TFSSs involves using an initial thick wafer as a substrate. The substrate may be mono- or multi-crystalline. To obtain a 3-D structure, the substrate surface may be patterned using techniques such as lithography followed by wet etch. Next, a porous silicon structure is created on the surface. This is followed by epitaxially depositing the desired thickness of the silicon using techniques such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD). The epitaxial silicon layer is then dislodged from the porous silicon layer by mechanical or chemical means. This results in a wafer with a desired thickness and a planar or 3-D structure. The example thin-film silicon substrates shown in
In one embodiment, the present disclosure employs thin film solar cells that have a three-dimensional structure where a desired structural pattern has been formed using MEMS type processing.
The following describes the formation of N+ emitter for a p-type base c-Si TFSC material. The same procedures may be used to make P+ emitter for an n-type base c-Si TFSC material. To form an N+ emitter in a p-type silicon TFSC, the dopant species may be P, As, and Sb, while B, Al, Ga, and In may be used to form P+ emitter in an n-type silicon TFSC substrate.
Ion implantation of P and B for forming the emitter in a p-type and n-type silicon, respectively, followed by a suitable annealing treatment, have been shown to yield solar cells with high efficiency. The present disclosure provides a similar P and B ion implantation combined with a suitable annealing treatment to form emitters in thin-film planar and three-dimensional solar cells in p-type or n-type silicon, respectively.
In one embodiment, the ion implantation methods for forming a homogenous emitter layer 32 and back surface field 34 include forming a homogeneous phosphorous doped emitter in the front surface of the substrate by using ion implantation after manufacturing a 3-D thin-film c-Si p-type wafer. The back surface field is created by implanting a P-type dopant such as boron. The cell is then completed using standard passivation and metallization techniques.
As in
For homogeneous emitter layers, using blanket implantation control of the dopant profile can provide higher efficiency. To maximize current collection from the solar cell, a good ‘blue response’ is required. This requires the maximum phosphorous content near the surface to be less than 1E21 cm-3 and the depth of the emitter to be preferably in the range of 0.3 to 0.5 um. Hence, the solar industry is moving to shallow emitters. However, the current industrial emitter formation processes, such as POCl3-based doping or PSG deposition or phosphoric acid spray-on followed by in-line anneal, do not provide the control of the phosphorous concentration and depth independently. The emitter characteristics are solely determined by the temperature and time used for the doping anneal. On the other hand, ion implantation provides the ability to make shallow junctions of desired dopant concentrations by the control of ion dose and energy. The use of the disclosed ion implantation process thus makes it possible to obtain emitters with the desired surface dopant concentration, profile, and depth. Implanted emitters also eliminate the phosphorus dead layer and other complications commonly associated with POCl3-doped emitters.
Alternatively, higher efficiency of solar cells may be obtained using the ‘selective emitter’ approach. The current standard technique for the formation of selective emitters involves several steps. First, the full front surface of a p-type wafer is lightly doped using the POCl3 based process or a process involving spraying a phosphorous-compound followed by anneal. Then a passivating dielectric is deposited on the front surface. The regions that are desired to be contacted by metal are then selectively opened in this dielectric, either using laser ablation or etch gel. A second doping process is then carried out to selectively dope these localized regions with a high concentration of phosphorous. However, this process is often lengthy and costly.
The present disclosure also describes implantation of B and P ions to produce suitable back surface field (BSF) in thin-film planar and three dimensional solar cells in p-type or n-type silicon, respectively.
The current industrial practice of making the back surface field (BSF) using Al-paste firing and forming the Al—Si alloy to provide the P+ layer has severe limitations. The p/p+ interface is not sharp but is instead diffused—resulting in low reflectivity for minority carrier electrons. The Si/Al—Si interface is also diffused, resulting in low optical reflectivity for long wavelength photons. Additionally, there are manufacturing problems such as the low conductivity of Al paste and the wafer bow resulting from the intimate mixing of the thick paste with silicon wafer. Using the implantation of B ions for p-type substrates (and P for n-type) eliminates these issues. As explained above for emitters, a sharp BSF of a desired profile may be easily obtained using the ion implantation methods of the present disclosure.
To achieve uniform doping of the ledges of the 3-D TFSC, the wafer may be rotated during implantation so that all sides or faces of the structure are uniformly doped.
Similar to the profile engineering disclosed above for the emitter, any desired profile of BSF may be obtained. The structure of 3-D TFSC may be used to obtain selective doping for the BSF. The heavily doped tips are then selectively contacted by a back metal, such as aluminum.
Similar to the case of emitter formation discussed in above, an angled ion implantation of the 3-D TFSC may be also used to obtain selective doping for the BSF. The heavily doped tips are then selectively contacted by back metal.
After the formation of the emitter and BSF, either homogeneously or selectively doped, the implant anneal process may be combined with oxidation to produce high quality front and back passivation of cells.
It is known that the passivation on N+ surfaces is enhanced when the passivating dielectric has extra positive charge. The SiN:H typically used in the solar industry has a surplus positive charge which, when controlled properly, can help provide superior passivation of N+ surfaces. Similarly, the dielectric layer passivating the back surface field may be implanted with a negatively charged ion to further reduce the surface recombination due to the field effect.
The ion implantation methods of the present disclosure may also be used to obtain localized openings in the dielectric layer for metal contacts. For this, the tips or ledges of the 3-D TFSC are selectively implanted with an ion species, such as nitrogen, that retards/slows the growth of oxide during a subsequent thermal oxidation process. During oxidation the passivating oxide grows everywhere except for these high, tip regions which have been selectively implanted. The small amount of SiN formation due the implantation of N is easily removed in a cleaning sequence involving dilute HF followed by phosphoric acid etch. These regions are then selectively contacted by metal. On the front surface the selectively opened regions can be selectively contacted with metal using plating, ink-jet or other techniques. This facilitates the optimization of front metal pattern to improve the cell performance. On the back side these regions can be selectively plated or contacted upon the blanket deposition of aluminum using PVD or evaporation schemes. Such localized contact scheme leads to the well know PERL (passivated emitter and rear locally diffused) type of cell structure and with it well known performance benefits.
Selective emitter 104 is conveniently obtained during the blanket implantation of emitter layer 94. The n-type wafer with a pyramidal 3-D structure is implanted with boron to form emitter layer 94—lower doped on the side walls but highly doped on the flat surface. Front side field 92 is obtained by blanket implantation of phosphorous.
The planar back contact TFSC in
The silicon template making process starts with a mono-crystalline (100) silicon wafer (140). The starting wafer may be in circular or square shapes. Step 160 involves forming a thin hard masking layer (144) on the exposed wafer surfaces. The hard masking layer is used to mask the silicon surface areas that do not need to be etched in the later steps—the surface areas that will become the top surface of the template. The proper hard masking layer includes, but is not limited to, thermally grown silicon oxide and low-pressure vapor phase deposited (LPCVD) silicon nitride. Steps 162 involves a photolithography step, which consists of photoresist coating, baking, UV light exposure over a photomask, post baking, photoresist developing, wafer cleaning and drying. After this step, the pattern on the photomask (146) depicting an array or a staggered pattern of inverted pyramidal base openings, will be transferred to the photoresist layer. The patterned photoresist layer is used as a soft masking layer for the hard masking layer etching of step 164. Step 164 involves further transferring the photoresist pattern to the hard masking layer layered underneath by chemical etching, such as etching a thin silicon oxide layer with buffered HF solution. Other wet etching methods and dry etching methods as known in semiconductor and MEMS wafer processing may also be used. After oxide etch the remaining soft masking layer, i.e. the photoresist layer (150), is removed and the wafer (148) is cleaned. Examples of photoresist removal process include wet methods, such as using acetone or piranha solution (a mixture of sulfuric acid and In step 166 the wafers are batch loaded in an anisotropic silicon wet etchant such as KOH solution. The typical etch temperature is in the range of 50° C. to 80° C. and etch rate is about 0.2 um/min to 1 um/min. TMAH (tetramethylammonium hydroxide) is an alternative anisotropic silicon etching chemical. The KOH or TMAH silicon etch rate depends upon the orientations to crystalline silicon planes. The (111) family of crystallographic planes are etched at a very slow rate and are normally “stop” planes for the anisotropic etching of a (100) silicon wafer with patterned hard mask. As a result, the intersection of two (111) planes or a (111) plane with a bottom (100) plane produce anisotropic etching structures for (100) silicon wafers after a time-controlled etch. Examples of these structures include V-grooves and pyramidal cavities with sharp tip cavity bottom (where (111) planes meet) or a small flat cavity bottom (a remaining (100) plane). In step 168 the oxide from the top is removed and the template cleaned. Next, the wafer may be cleaned in standard SC1 (mixture of NH4OH and H2O2) and SC2 (mixture of HCL and H2O2) wafer wet cleaning solutions followed by a thorough deionized wafer rinsing and hot N2 drying. The disclosed process results in a silicon template with inverted pyramidal cavities In step 170, silicon template 154 is ready for processing.
Step 180 marks the beginning of a silicon template re-use cycle. In step 182, a porous silicon layer (192) is formed by electrochemical HF etching on the silicon template front surfaces. The porous silicon layer is to be used as a sacrificial layer for epitaxial silicon layer release. The porous silicon layer preferably consists of two thin layers with different porosities. The first thin porous silicon layer is a top layer and is formed first from the bulk silicon wafer. The first thin layer preferably has a lower porosity of 10%-35%. The second thin porous silicon layer is directly grown from the bulk silicon and is underneath the first thin layer of porous silicon. The 2nd thin porous silicon layer preferably has a higher porosity in the range of 40%˜80%. The top porous silicon layer is used as a crystalline seed layer for high quality epitaxial silicon growth and the bottom underneath higher porosity porous silicon layer is used for facilitating TFSS release due to its less dense physical connections between the epitaxial and bulk silicon interfaces and its weak mechanical strength. Alternatively, a single porous silicon layer with a progressively increased or graded porosity from top to bottom may also be used. In this case, the top portion of the porous silicon layer has a low porosity of 10% to 35% and the lower portion of the porous silicon layer has a high porosity of 40% to 80%. Before step 184, the epitaxial silicon growth, the wafer may be baked in a high temperature (at 950° C. to 1150° C.) hydrogen environment within the epitaxial silicon deposition reactor in order to form coalesced structures with relatively large voids within the higher-porosity porous silicon layer (or portion of a single layer) while forming a continuous surface seed layer of crystalline silicon on the lower-porosity porous silicon layer (or portion of a single layer). In step 184, a mono-crystalline silicon epitaxial layer with n-type base (194) is deposited on the front side only. For front contacted cell, the bulk base of the epitaxial layer is p-type, boron (B2H6) doped. The thickness of the epitaxial layer is preferably in the range of 10 um to 60 um. Prior to the release of the epitaxial silicon layer, an encompassing border trench may be made on the peripheral of the active wafer area to facilitate the release of the TFSS. The encompassing trenches may be formed by controlled laser cutting and their depths are preferably in the range of 10 um to 100 um. The trenches define the boundary of the 3-D TFSS to be released and allow initiation of the release from the trenched region. The remaining epitaxial silicon layer may be removed by mechanical grinding or polishing of the template edges. In step 186, the epitaxial layer of silicon (200) is released and separated from the silicon template. The released epitaxial silicon layer is referred to as a 3-D thin film silicon substrate (3-D TFSS). The epitaxial layer release methods disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/473,811 entitled, SUBSTRATE RELEASE METHODS AND APPARATUS are hereby incorporated by reference. The 3-D TFSS may be released in an ultrasonic DI-water bath. Or in another release method, the 3-D TFSS may be released by direct pulling with wafer backside and top epitaxial vacuum chucked. In another release method, the epitaxial layer is released by direct pulling with wafer backside and top epitaxial vacuum chucked. Using this method the porous silicon layer may be fully or partially fractured. The chucks may use either electrostatic or vacuum chucking to secure the wafer. The wafer is first placed on bottom wafer chuck with TFSS substrate facing upwards. A bottom chuck secures the template side of wafer, and the top wafer chuck is gently lowered and secures TFSS substrate side of the wafer. The activated pulling mechanism lifts top chuck upwards, and the movement may be guided evenly by slider rails.
In step 188, the released 3-D TFSS backside surface is cleaned by short silicon etching using KOH or TMAH solutions to remove the silicon debris and fully or partially remove the quasi-mono-crystalline silicon (QMS) layer. After removal of the epitaxial silicon layer from the template, the template is cleaned in step 175 by using diluted HF and diluted wet silicon etch solution, such as TMAH and/or KOH to remove the remaining porous silicon layers and silicon particles. Then the template is further cleaned by conventional silicon wafer cleaning methods, such as SC1 and SC2 wet cleaning to removal possible organic and metallic contaminations. Finally, after proper rinsing with DI water and N2 drying, the template is ready for another re-use cycle.
In operation, the disclosed subject matter provides ion implantation methods for forming emitter regions, selective emitter regions, front surface fields, back surface fields, and base regions for the formation of crystalline thin-film silicon solar cells.
The foregoing description of the exemplary embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the subject matter. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without the use of the innovative faculty. Thus, the subject matter to be claimed in subsequently filed applications is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
This application also claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/175,698 filed on Apr. 5, 2009, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4043894 | Gibbs | Aug 1977 | A |
4070206 | Kressel et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4082570 | House et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4165252 | Gibbs | Aug 1979 | A |
4249959 | Jebens | Feb 1981 | A |
4251679 | Zwan | Feb 1981 | A |
4348254 | Lindmayer | Sep 1982 | A |
4361950 | Amick | Dec 1982 | A |
4409423 | Holt | Oct 1983 | A |
4427839 | Hall | Jan 1984 | A |
4461922 | Gay et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4479847 | McCaldin et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4626613 | Wenham et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4672023 | Leung | Jun 1987 | A |
4922277 | Carlson | May 1990 | A |
5024953 | Uematsu et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5073230 | Maracas et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5112453 | Behr et al. | May 1992 | A |
5208068 | Davis | May 1993 | A |
5248621 | Sano | Sep 1993 | A |
5316593 | Olson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5348618 | Canham et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5397400 | Matsuno et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5459099 | Hsu | Oct 1995 | A |
5494832 | Lehmann et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5538564 | Kaschmitter | Jul 1996 | A |
5645684 | Keller | Jul 1997 | A |
5660680 | Keller | Aug 1997 | A |
5681392 | Swain | Oct 1997 | A |
5882988 | Haberern et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5928438 | Salami | Jul 1999 | A |
6091021 | Ruby | Jul 2000 | A |
6096229 | Shahid | Aug 2000 | A |
6114046 | Hanoka | Sep 2000 | A |
6127623 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6204443 | Kiso et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6294725 | Hirschberg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6331208 | Nishida et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6399143 | Sun et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416647 | Dordi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429037 | Wenham et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441297 | Keller et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448155 | Iwasaki et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461932 | Wang | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6524880 | Moon et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6534336 | Iwane | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6555443 | Artmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6566235 | Nishida et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6602760 | Poortmans et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6602767 | Nishida et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613148 | Rasmussen | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624009 | Green et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645833 | Brendel | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649485 | Solanki et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653722 | Blalock | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6664169 | Iwasaki et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6756289 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6881644 | Malik et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6946052 | Yanagita et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964732 | Solanki | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7022585 | Solanki et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7026237 | Lamb | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7368756 | Bruhns et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7402523 | Nishimura | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20020153039 | Moon et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168592 | Vezenov | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179140 | Toyomura | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030017712 | Brendel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030039843 | Johnson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030124761 | Baert | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040028875 | Van Rijn | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040173790 | Yeo | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040259335 | Narayanan | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265587 | Koyanagi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050160970 | Niira | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172998 | Gee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050176164 | Gee et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177343 | Nagae | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189015 | Rohatgi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050199279 | Yoshimine et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050274410 | Yuuki et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281982 | Li | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021565 | Zahler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043495 | Uno | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054212 | Fraas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070884 | Momoi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105492 | Veres et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060196536 | Fujioka | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231031 | Dings et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266916 | Miller et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283495 | Gibson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070077770 | Wang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082499 | Jung et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080047601 | Nag et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080157283 | Moslehi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080210294 | Moslehi | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080264477 | Moslehi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080289684 | Moslehi | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295887 | Moslehi | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090042320 | Wang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090107545 | Moslehi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090227094 | Bateman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090301549 | Moslehi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100022074 | Wang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100116316 | Moslehi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
06-260670 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2002-2299661 | Oct 2002 | JP |
PCTEP1999008573 | May 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alvin D. Compaan, Photovoltaics: Clean Power for the 21st Century, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 2170-2180, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
C.Berge, 150-mm Layer Transfer for Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cells, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 3102-3107, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
C.Oules et al, Silicon on Insulator Structures Obtained by Epitaxial Growth of Silicon over Porous Silicon, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Inc., 1992, p. 3595, vol. 139, No. 12, Meylan Cedex, France. |
C.S.Solanki, et al, Porous Silicon Layer Transfer Processes for Solar Cells, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2004, pp. 101-113, vol. 83, Elsevier B.V., Leuven, Belgium. |
C.S.Solanki, et al, Self-Standing Porous Silicon Films by One-Step Anodizing, Journal of Electrochemical Society, 2004, pp. C307-C314, vol. 151, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Leuven, Belgium. |
F.Duerinckx, et al, Reorganized Porous Silicon Bragg Reflectors for Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells, IEEE Electron Device Letters, Oct. 2006, vol. 27, No. 10. |
Francois J. Henley, Layer-Transfer Quality Cleave Principles, SiGen, Jul. 8, 2005 pp. 1-6, The Silicon Genesis Corporation, San Jose, California. |
H.J.Kim, et al, Large-Area Thin-Film Free-Standing Monocrystalline Si Solar cells by Layer Transfer, Leuven, Belgium, IEEE. |
J.H.Werner et al, From Polycrystalline to Single Crystalline Silicon on Glass, Thin Solid Films, 2001, pp. 95-100, vol. 383, Issue 1-2, Elsevier Science B.V., Germany. |
J.J. Schermer et al., Epitaxial Lift-Off for large area thin film III/V devices, phys. Stat. sol. (a) 202, No. 4, 501-508 (2005). |
Jianhua Zhao, et al, A 19.8% Efficient Honeycomb Multicrystalline Silicon Solar Cell with Improved Light Trapping, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1999, vol. 46, No. 10. |
K. Van Nieuwenhuysen et al., Progress in epitaxial deposition on low-cost substrates for thin-film crystalline silicon solar cells at IMEC, Journal of Crystal Growth, 2006, pp. 438-441, vol. 287, Elsevier B.V., Leuven, Belgium. |
K.L. Chopra et al., Thin-Film Solar Cells: An Overview, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2004, pp. 69-92, vol. 12, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Lammert et al., The Interdigitated Back Contact Solar Cell: A Silicon Solar Cell for Use in Concentrated Sunlight, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, pp. 337-342. |
Macdonald et al., “Design and Fabrication of Highly Topographic Nano-imprint Template for Dual Damascene Full 3-D Imprinting,” Dept. of Chemical Eng., University of Texas at Austin, Oct. 24, 2005. |
Martin A. Green, Consolidation of Thin-Film Photovoltaic Technology: The Coming Decade of Opportunity, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 383-392, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Martin A. Green, Silicon Photovoltaic Modules: A Brief History of the First 50 Years, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2005, pp. 447-455, vol. 13, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Nobuhiko Sato et al, Epitaxial Growth on Porous Si for a New Bond and Etchback Silicon-on-Insulator, Journal of Electrochemical Society, Sep. 1995, vol. 142, No. 9, The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Hiratsuka, Japan. |
P.J.Verlinden, et al, Sliver® Solar Cells: A New Thin-Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Technology, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 3422-3430, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
P.R. Hageman et al., Large Area, Thin Film Epitaxial Lift Off III/V Solar Cells, 25th PVSC, 1996, May 13-17, Washington D.C., IEEE. |
Photovoltaic Technology Research Advisory Council, A Vision for Photovoltaic Technology, 2005, pp. 1-41, European Commision Publications Office. |
Prometheus Institute, U.S. Solar Industry Year in Review: U.S. Solar Energy Industry Charging Ahead, (SEIA) The Solar Energy Industry Association. |
R.Brendel, et al, Sol-Gel Coatings for Light Trapping in Crystalline Thin Film Silicon Solar Cells, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1997, pp. 391-394, vol. 218, Elsevier Science B.V., Germany. |
Richard Auer et al, Simplified Transfer Process for High-Current Thin-Film Crystalline Si Solar Modules, 3rd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, May 11-18, 2003, Osaka, Japan. |
Richard M. Swanson, A Vision for Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 443-453, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Rolf Brendel, A Novel Process for Ultrathin Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cells on Glass, 14th European Photovolaic Solar Energy Conference, Jun. 30-Jul. 4, 1997, Barcelona, Spain. |
Rolf Brendel, Review of Layer Transfer Processes for Cystalline Thin-Film Silicon Solar Cells, The Japan Journal of Applied Physics, 2001, pp. 4431-4439, vol. 40, Part 1, No. 7, The Japan Society of Applied Physics, Japan. |
Rolf Brendel, Thin-Film Crystalline Silicone Mini-Modules Using Porous Si for Layer Transfer, Solar Energy, 2004, pp. 969-982, vol. 77, Elsevier Ltd., Germany. |
S. Hegedus, Thin Film Solar Modules: The Low Cost, High Throughput and Versatile Alternative to Si Wafers, Progress in Photvoltaics: Research and Applications, 2006, pp. 393-411, vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Takao Yonehara, et al, Epitaxial Layer Transfer by Bond and Etch Back of Porous Si, Applied Physics Letter 64, Apr. 18, 1994, vol. 16, American Institute of Physics. |
Toshiki Yagi, et al, Ray-Trace Simulation of Light Trapping in Silicon Solar Cell with Texture Structures, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2006, pp. 2647-2656, vol. 90, Elsevier B.V. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100304522 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61175698 | May 2009 | US |