The present invention relates to an ion mobility separation device.
Ion mobility separation devices, which separate and detections according to their ion mobilities, are widely used as devices for on-site measurement such as environmental analysis, detection of explosives, detection of illegal drugs and detection of chemicals, owing to their capability to operate at atmospheric pressure without requiring a vacuum pump. In ion mobility separation devices, a technique for separating ions generated by an ion source with high accuracy and then detecting the ions with high sensitivity and high throughput is considered to be important in order to further broaden their applications and reduce the false detection.
PTL 1 describes a method for reducing the size of an ion mobility separation device and increasing its throughput using plate insulator materials such as glass. PTL 1 also describes a method in which current detection electrodes are disposed in the direction in which ions travel to increase the ability by using plate insulator materials.
PTL 1: U.S. Pat. No. 6,495,823
In an ion mobility detector, which separates and detects ions according to their ion mobilities, a technique for separating and detecting ions generated by an ion source with high sensitivity, high accuracy and high throughput is important. In particular, in a field asymmetric ion mobility detector, increase of the ion resolution and increase of the throughput have been conflicting factors. That is, when the correction electric field is set in detail to increase the ion resolution, the time required for scanning the measurement condition becomes longer and this causes the reduction of the throughput.
Although PTL 1 discloses that the throughput is increased by arraying separation electrodes and flow paths, arrayed separation electrodes cause the charge-up phenomenon in insulator parts in the gaps of the arrayed electrodes or generate a fringing field, resulting in a problem of deteriorated resolution or specificity. This problem arises remarkably, especially when the array distances become finer. In addition, arrayed flow paths also cause a problem of deteriorated resolution or specificity due to the flow generated by the friction against the wall surfaces.
The above problems are solved for example by the following means. Namely, an ion mobility separation device: which comprises an ion source generating ions; a pair of spaced plate electrodes defining a flow path between a sample inlet and a sample outlet of the ions; a voltage controller for applying an asymmetric time-varying voltage and direct-current voltages to the plate electrodes; and current detectors aligned in a direction perpendicular to a flow-path direction and a direction in which the asymmetric time-varying voltage is applied: wherein at least one of the pair of plate electrodes contains a first electrode section having a first conductivity, a second electrode section having a second conductivity, and a third electrode section interposed between the first electrode section and the second electrode section, wherein the third electrode section has a third conductivity smaller than the first conductivity and the second conductivity; the first electrode section, the third electrode section and the second electrode section are aligned in a direction perpendicular to the flow-path direction and the direction in which the asymmetric time-varying voltage is applied; and the voltage controller applies different direct-current voltages to the first electrode section and the second electrode section.
According to the invention, it becomes possible in a field asymmetric ion mobility separation device to obtain spectra corresponding to correction voltages simultaneously, while the deterioration of the resolution due to the charge-up phenomenon is reduced, and thus the throughput and the resolution can be compatible.
Example 1 is supplementarily explained using
Because the flow of the gas is disturbed near the spacers 20, it is desirable to use areas other than the areas near the spacers 20 (around 2d) for the ion separation sections. In this case, it is possible to make a modification in which the separation electrode(s) is(are) divided into sections with high conductivities (2a and 2c) and a section with a low conductivity (2b) and thus the value of the voltage applied to this section (2b) is controlled low. The sections with high conductivities (2a and 2c) are metals or the like: while the section with a low conductivity (2b) has semiconductivity and can be produced from for example a metal oxide thin film, a metal nitride thin film or an organic conductor. When the widths of the sections 2a, 2b and 2c are all 1 cm for example, the power consumption becomes about one third by producing only the section 2b from a substance with a low conductivity and the risk of the damage of a separation electrode 2 due to the temperature rise can be reduced. The section with a low conductivity (2b) has an end-to-end resistance of about 50 Ω or more and 5 kΩ or less. As the end-to-end resistance becomes larger, there is a disadvantage that the influence of the surrounding electrical noise becomes greater or the separation voltage distorts at around the center: while when the end-to-end resistance is decreased, the power consumption increases and there is a risk of the damage of the separation electrode 2 due to the temperature rise. However, an end-to-end resistance in the above range can solve both problems. It is possible to make a modification in which the value of the voltage applied to 2b is controlled low, also by reducing the numbers of the detection electrodes and the signal processors thorough disposing the detection electrodes 3 and 4 on areas except for the areas near the spacers. On the other hand, when different DC voltages are applied to electrodes sectioned as in PTL 1, there is a problem that the charge-up phenomenon or the like is caused in the insulator parts between the electrodes and the electric field is disturbed, resulting in the deterioration of the resolution.
A composite voltage of a separation voltage (SV), which is an asymmetric voltage, and a calibration voltage (CV) is applied to the separation electrode 1 and the separation electrode 2 by the power sources 51, 52 and 53. An example of the separation voltage to be applied is shown in
Composite Wave=Vmain Sin(2πft)+Vsub Cos(2π(2f)t+φ) (Math. 1)
In addition to the above example, the separation voltage (SV), which is an asymmetric voltage, varies widely for example a square wave. By using a wave with a high frequency and a harmonic wave thereof as described above, it is possible to generate an asymmetric voltage of several kV relatively easily with a single coil.
The calibration voltage varies depending on the position in the x-direction (see
CV(x)=Va+(Vc−Va)x/s (Math. 2)
As described above, because the correction voltage varies depending on the position in a direction (x-direction) perpendicular to the ion-traveling direction and the asymmetric voltage, it is possible to obtain information of spectra corresponding to different correction voltages simultaneously by aligning the detectors in the x-direction. It is also possible to determine the positions of the detectors on the x-axis based on the values of the calibration voltages on the x-axis. The detectors are sometimes disposed at a regular interval or may be disposed at irregular intervals to achieve desired calibration voltages.
When the charge-up phenomenon is caused by the collision of ions with insulators, the transmittance of ions decreases and the ion resolution deteriorates. However, by disposing electrodes such as electrodes 14 and electrodes 15 near the paths of the ions on the substrate 12 and the substrate 13, the charge-up phenomenon can be prevented. By using a region formed by a direct-current electric field at the inlet edge of the separation electrode 1 to which the RF voltage is applied, like the electrodes 15, it is possible to decrease the degree of the phenomenon in which ions are deflected by the fringing electric field at the edge of the separation electrode 1 and the transmittance is reduced.
A diagram explaining an effect of this system is shown in
A diagram explaining an effect of this system is shown in
In this regard, although examples in which an atmospheric-pressure ion source was used as the ion source have been described in the Examples, it is possible to use ions generated at a high pressure or a low pressure and combine them with any of the separation devices of Example 1 to Example 3.
In addition, although examples in which the ion mobility separation systems were placed at atmospheric pressure have been described, the separator device can be placed in a low vacuum to at a high pressure, in which ion mobility separation is considered to be possible.
Furthermore, in the Examples, although examples in which a detector ammeter and a weak-current amplifier were used in combination as the detector have been described, it is possible to combine with semiconductor detectors such as a charge coupled device and a complementary metal oxide semiconductor, and ion detection methods such as an electron multiplier.
1 Separation electrode (conductive electrode), 2 separation electrode, 3 detection electrode (for cations), 4 detection electrode (for anions), 5 mesh electrode, 6 mesh electrode, 8 ion, 9 ion, 10 ion source, 11 pump, 12 substrate, 13 substrate, 14 electrode, 15 electrode, 18 detection electrode (for cations), 19 detection electrode (for anions), 20 spacer, 50 controller, 51 power source, 52 power source, 53 power source, 54 amplifier, 55 data recorder, 56 signal processor, 57 pulse acceleration power source, 61 signal derived from sample A, 62 signal derived from sample B, 63 signal derived from sample C, 64 signal derived from sample D, 65 signal derived from sample E, 71 signal derived from sample A, 72 signal derived from sample B, 73 signal derived from sample C, 74 signal derived from sample D, 75 signal derived from sample E, 101 gas-flow direction, 102 ion-traveling direction, 103 ion-traveling direction, and 105 ion-traveling direction.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2012/067060 | 7/4/2012 | WO | 00 | 12/24/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/006698 | 1/9/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5180480 | Manz | Jan 1993 | A |
6495823 | Miller et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6512224 | Miller et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
20010023825 | Frumin | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20100148053 | Belford et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
5-80032 | Mar 1993 | JP |
2003-514349 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2012-512506 | May 2012 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Jul. 31, 2012 with English translation (five (5) pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150190815 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |