The present invention relates to an ion sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) and, in particular, to improving the sensitivity of an ISFET through dynamic biasing of the front gate.
Reference is made to
Reference is made to
See, Al-Ahdal, et al., “High Gain ISFET based vMOS Chemical Inverter,” Sensors and Actuators B 171-171 (2012), incorporated by reference.
See, also, Parizi, et al., “Exceeding Nerst Limit (59 mV/pH): CMOS-based pH Sensor for Autonomous Applications,” IEEE Electron Devices Meeting (2012), incorporated by reference.
See, also, Spijkma, et al., “Beyond the Nerst-limit With Dual-Gate ZnO Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistors,” Applied Physicas Letters 98 (2011), incorporated by reference.
In an embodiment, a sensing system comprises: a dual gate ion sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) having a first bias voltage node coupled to a back gate of the ISFET and a second bias voltage node coupled to a control gate of the ISFET; and a bias voltage generator circuit configured to generate a back gate voltage having a first magnitude and a first polarity for application to the first bias voltage node and configured to generate a control gate voltage having a second magnitude and a second polarity, wherein the second polarity is opposite the first polarity, for application to the second bias voltage node.
In an embodiment, a method is provided for controlling operation of a dual gate ion sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) having a first bias voltage node coupled to a back gate of the ISFET and a second bias voltage node coupled to a control gate of the ISFET. The method comprises: generating a back gate voltage having a first magnitude and a first polarity for application to the first bias voltage node; and generating a control gate voltage having a second magnitude and a second polarity, wherein the second polarity is opposite the first polarity, for application to the second bias voltage node.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.
In the drawings:
Reference is made to
An active region of the film layer 106 is delimited by trench isolation structures 108. Within the active region, source and drain regions 114 and 116, respectively, are provided in the film layer 106. The regions 114 and 116 are, for example, doped with an n-type dopant. Although not specifically illustrated in
A gate oxide layer 118 extends on a top surface of the film layer 106 at least over a channel region 120 positioned between the source region 114 and drain region 116. Metal source and drain contacts 122 and 124, respectively, are provided in electrical connection to the source and drain regions 114 and 116. A front gate electrode 126f is provided on and over the gate oxide layer 118 along with a metal front gate contact 128f.
The trench isolation structures 108 further delimit a region 112 of the substrate for accessing, through electrical connection, the semiconductor support layer 102. In particular, the electrical access to a portion 126b of the semiconductor support layer 102 adjacent the buried oxide layer 104 and the channel region 120 provides a back gate electrode. Electrical connection to the region 112 is made through a metal back gate contact 128b. In an embodiment, the portion 126b of the semiconductor support layer 102 may have a different (i.e., higher) dopant concentration level than the semiconductor support layer 102 itself. The back gate electrode is biased by a back gate voltage Vbg.
An insulating material 130 covers the structures described above with an electrical connection 132 (provided by metallization layers—lines and vias) to the gate contact 128 extending through the insulating material. A conductive chemical gate electrode 134 extends on a top surface of the insulating material and is electrically connected to the electrical connection 132. An insulating passivation layer 138, for example made of oxinitride or silicon nitride, extends on the top surface of the conductive chemical gate electrode 134 and is configured to receive a drop of test liquid 142. The test liquid 142 is biased by a reference electrode 144 coupled to receive a control gate voltage Vcg. The reference electrode 144 may, for example, be deposited on the surface of the insulating passivation layer 138. In this implementation, the front gate electrode 126f and electrically connected conductive chemical gate electrode 134 form a floating gate electrode and the liquid deposit provides the sensing gate electrode. The test liquid 142 may, for example, comprise a biological or electrochemical material. In operation, the drain current of the ISFET 100 is modulated by the ion content of the test liquid. The ISFET 100 accordingly functions as an ion sensor (for example, a pH sensor).
For comparison purposes,
The floating gate voltage Vfg is given by the following equation:
where Ct is the summation of the capacitances Cox and Ccg. Qi is the induced charge in the floating gate due to the charge σ at the insulating passivation layer 138 above the conductive chemical gate electrode 134. As noted above, the control gate voltage Vcg is dynamically varied as a function of the applied back gate voltage Vbg. In particular, the control gate voltage Vcg has a dynamically set value that is proportional in magnitude to the back gate voltage Vbg but inverse in polarity.
Reference is now made to
The use of an opposite polarity voltage is mandatory for sensitivity enhancement (for example, if Vbg is swept from 0 to 4V, Vcg can be swept from 0 to −0.3V—or whatever negative voltage can be tolerated by the front gate of the transistor). The magnitude of the Vcg sweep has no single optimal value: the wider the sweep applied to the control gate, the greater the resulting sensitivity. But there are constraints set by the maximum permissible negative voltage that can be applied to the transistor front gate. In an example implementation, the Vbg sweep is 0 to 4V while the control gate sweep is −0.1 to −0.6V and this produces a 5× sensitivity amplification. If the transistor front gate can withstand −1.1V, then even greater sensitivity can be obtained by sweeping −0.1 to −1.1 V at the control gate. Regarding proportionality each Vcg sweeping point in voltage should correspond to a proportional sweeping point of Vbg. A proportional relationship is required if smooth ID-VBG curves are desired. Advantageously, information defining the functional proportional relationship (for example, magnitudes) between the control gate voltage Vcg and the back gate voltage Vbg can be programmed 196 into the bias voltage generator circuit 190. This information is used by the first and second voltage generator circuits 192 and 194 to generate the respective voltages. In this way, the same ISFET 100 configuration with bias voltage generator circuit 190 can be used in a number of different applications simply by adjusting the programmed functional relationship information for the control gate voltage Vcg and the back gate voltage Vbg depending on the desired application.
It is noted that limited sensitivity is a critical concern with prior art ISFET systems such those in
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20050230271 | Levon | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20150330941 | Smith | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160013205 | Vinet | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Spijknnan et al. (Adv. Funct. Mater. 20, 898-905) (Year: 2010). |
Jang et al. (Appl. Phys. Letters 99, 043703) (Year: 2011). |
Agilent 4155C Technical Data (Year: 2000). |
Jang et al. (Appl. Phys. Letters 100, 073701) (Year: 2012). |
Agilent 4155C User's Guide (Year: 2012). |
Ayele, et al., “TCAD Simulation of an Ultrahigh Sensitive ISFET with a Sensitive Gate Integrated in the BEOL of an FDSOI Industrial Platform,”. |
P. Bergveld, Development of an Ion-Sensitive Solid-State Device for Neurophysiological Measurements, IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering, Jan. 1970. |
Hyun-June Jang, Won-Ju Cho, Performance Enhancement of Capacitive-Coupling Dual-gate Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistor in Ultra-Thin-Body, Seoul 139-701, Scientific reports, 2014. |
Kaisti, et al., “An Ion-Sensitive Floating Gate FET Model: Operating Principles and Electrofluidic Gating,” IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, vol. 62, No. 8, 2015. |
K. B. Parizi, A. J. Yeh, A. S. Y. Poon and H. S. P. Wong, (2012, Dec.) “Exceeding Nernst limit (59mV/pH): CMOS-based pH sensor for autonomous applications,” Presented at Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), IEEE. |
Rahhal, et al., “High Sensitivity pH Sensing on the BEOL of Industrial FDSOI Transistors,”. |
Ramesh, et al., “Towards in vivo biosensors for low-cost protein sensing,” Electronics Letters, vol. 49, No. 7, 2013. |
Rothberg, J. M., Hinz, W., Rearick, T. M., Schultz, J., Mileski, W., Davey, M., . . . & Hoon, J. (2011). An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing. Nature, 475(7356), 348-352. |
M. Spijkman, et. al., Beyond the Nernst-limit with dual-gate ZnO ion-sensitive field-effect Transistors, Applied Physics Letters, 2011 (3 pages). |
S. Mezzasalma and D. Baldovino. (Dec. 1995). Characterization of silicon nitride surface in water and acid environment: a general approach to the colloidal suspensions. Coll. Inter. Sci. (8 pages). |
A. Al-Ahdal, et al, High gain ISFET based MOS chemical inverter, Sensors and Actuators B 171-172 (2012) (8 pages). |
Grattarola, Massimo et al: “Modeling H+-Sensitive FET's with SPICE,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 39, No. 4, Apr. 1992, pp. 813-819. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180372679 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |