Ion-sensitive hard water dispersible polymers and applications therefor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6630558
  • Patent Number
    6,630,558
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 7, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 7, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
The present invention is directed to ion-sensitive, hard water dispersible polymers. The present invention is also directed to a method of making ion-sensitive, hard water dispersible polymers and their applicability as binder compositions. The present invention is further directed to fiber-containing fabrics and webs comprising ion-sensitive, hard water dispersible binder compositions and their applicability in water dispersible personal care products.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to ion-sensitive, hard water dispersible polymers. The present invention is also directed to a method of making ion-sensitive, hard water dispersible polymers and their applicability as binder compositions. The present invention is further directed to fiber-containing fabrics and webs comprising ion-sensitive, hard water dispersible binder compositions and their applicability in water dispersible personal care products.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




For many years the problem of disposability has plagued industries, which provide disposable diapers, wet wipes, incontinent garments and feminine care products. While much headway has been made in addressing this problem, one of the weak links has been the inability to create an economical coherent fibrous web, which will readily dissolve or disintegrate in water, but still have in-use strength. See, for example, U.K. patent disclosure 2,241,373 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,186,233. Without such a product, the ability of the user to dispose of the product by flushing it down the toilet is greatly reduced, if not eliminated. Furthermore, the ability of the product to disintegrate in a landfill is quite limited because a large portion of the product components, which may well be biodegradable or photodegradable, are encapsulated in or bound together by plastic which degrades over a long period of time, if at all. Accordingly, if the plastic disintegrated in the presence of water, the internal components could degrade as a result of the rupture of the plastic encapsulation or binding.




Disposable diapers, feminine care products and adult incontinent care products usually comprise a body side liner which must rapidly pass fluids, such as urine or menses, so that the fluid may be absorbed by an absorbent core of the product. Typically, the body side liner is a coherent fibrous web, which desirably possesses a number of characteristics such as softness and flexibility. The fibrous web of the body side liner material is typically formed by wet or dry (air) laying a generally random plurality of fibers and joining them together to form a coherent web with a binder. Past binders have preformed this function well. From an environmental standpoint, it might be stated that the past binders have performed this function too well in that the binders tended not to degrade and thus the liner remained intact, severely hampering any environmental degradation of the disposable product.




Recent binder compositions have been developed which are more environmentally responsible and exhibit better water solubility than past binders. One class of binders includes polymeric materials having inverse solubility in water. These binders are insoluble in warm water, but are soluble in cold water, such as found in a toilet. It is well known that a number of polymers exhibit cloud points or inverse solubility properties in aqueous media. These polymers have been cited in several publications for various applications, including (1) as evaporation retarders (JP 6207162); (2) as temperature sensitive compositions, which are useful as temperature indicators due to a sharp color change associated with a corresponding temperature change (JP 6192527); (3) as heat sensitive materials that are opaque at a specific temperature and become transparent when cooled to below the specific temperature (JP 51003248 and JP 81035703); (4) as wound dressings with good absorbing characteristics and easy removal (JP 6233809); and (5) as materials in flushable personal care products (U.S. Pat. No. 5,509,913, issued to Richard S. Yeo on Apr. 23, 1996 and assigned to Kimberly-Clark Corporation).




Other recent binders of interest include a class of binders, which are ion-sensitive. Several U.S. and European patents assigned to Lion Corporation of Tokyo, Japan, disclose ion-sensitive polymers comprising acrylic acid and alkyl or aryl acrylates. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,312,883; 5,317,063; and 5,384,189; as well as, European Patent No. 608460A1. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,312,883, terpolymers are disclosed as suitable binders for flushable nonwoven webs. The disclosed acrylic acid-based terpolymers, which comprise partially neutralized acrylic acid, butyl acrylate and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, are suitable binders for use in flushable nonwoven webs in some parts of the world. However, because of the presence of a small amount of sodium acrylate in the partially neutralized terpolymer, these binders fail to disperse in water containing more than about 15 ppm Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


. When placed in water containing more than about 15 ppm Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


ions, nonwoven webs using the above-described binders maintain a tensile strength greater than 30 g/in, which negatively affects the “dispersibility” of the web. The proposed mechanism for the failure is that each calcium ion binds with two carboxylate groups either intramolecularly or intermolecularly. Intramolecular association causes the polymer chain to coil up, which eventually leads to polymer precipitation. Intermolecular association yields crosslinking. Whether intramolecular or intermolecular associations are taking place, the terpolymer is not soluble in water containing more than about 15 ppm Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


. Due to the strong interaction between calcium ions and the carboxylate groups of the terpolymer, dissociation of the complex is highly unlikely because this association is irreversible. Therefore, the above-described polymer that has been exposed to a high Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


concentration solution for about 8 hours or more will not disperse in water even if the calcium concentration decreases. This limits the application of the polymer as a flushable binder material because most areas across the U.S. have hard water, which contains more than 15 ppm Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


.




Although many patents disclose various ion and temperature sensitive compositions for flushable materials, there exists a need for flushable products possessing softness, three dimensionality, and resiliency; wicking and structural integrity in the presence of body fluids at body temperature; and true fiber dispersion after toilet flushing so that fibers do not become entangled with tree roots or at bends in sewer pipes. Moreover, there is a need in the art for flushable products having water-dispersibility in all areas of the world, including soft and hard water areas. Such a product is needed at a reasonable cost without compromising product safety and environmental concerns, something that past products have failed to do.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to ion-sensitive polymers, which have been developed to address the above-described problems associated with currently available, ion-sensitive polymers and other polymers described in literature. The ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention have a “trigger property,” such that the polymers are insoluble in high salt solutions, but soluble in low salt solutions, including hard water. Unlike some ion-sensitive polymers, which lose dispersibility in hard water because of ion cross-linking by calcium ions, the polymers of the present invention are relatively insensitive to calcium and/or magnesium ions. Consequently, flushable products containing the polymers of the present invention maintain dispersibility in hard water.




The polymeric materials of the present invention are useful as binders and structural components for air-laid and wet-laid nonwoven fabrics for applications such as body-side liner, fluid distribution material, fluid in-take material (surge) or cover stock in various personal care products. The polymeric materials of the present invention are particularly useful as a binder material for flushable personal care products such as diapers, feminine pads, panty liners, and wet wipes. The flushable products maintain integrity during storage and use, and break apart after disposal in the toilet when the salt concentration falls below a critical level.




The present invention also discloses how to make water-dispersible nonwovens, including coverstock (liner), intake (surge) materials and wet wipes, which are stable in fluids having high ionic content, using the above-described unique polymeric binder compositions. The resultant nonwovens are flushable and water-dispersible due to the tailored ion sensitivity, which is triggered regardless of the hardness of water found in toilets throughout the United States and the world.




DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




In order to be an effective ion triggerable material suitable for use in flushable personal care products, the material should desirably be (1) functional, i.e., maintain wet strength under controlled conditions and dissolve or disperse rapidly in soft or hard water such as found in a toilets and sinks around the world; (2) safe (not toxic); and (3) economical. The ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention meet the above criteria.




Unlike the Lion polymers and other polymers cited in technical literature, the polymers of the present invention are ion triggerable, as well as, soluble in water having from greater than about 15 ppm Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


to about 200 ppm Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


. The polymers of the present invention have been formulated to minimize the potentially strong interaction between the anions of the polymers and the cations in the water. This strong interaction can be explained via the hard-soft acid-base theory proposed by R. G. Pearson in the


Journal of the American Chemical Society


, vol. 85, pg. 3533 (1963); or N. S. Isaacs in the textbook,


Physical Organic Chemistry


, published by Longman Scientific and Technical with John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1987). Hard anions and hard cations interact strongly with one another. Soft anions and soft cations also interact strongly with one another. However, soft anions and hard cations, and vice-versa, interact weakly with one another. In the Lion polymers, the carboxylate anion of the sodium acrylate is a hard anion, which interacts strongly with the hard cations, Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


, present in moderately hard and hard water. By replacing the carboxylate anions with a softer anion, such as a sulfonate anion, the interaction between the anions of an ion-triggerable polymer and the hard cations, Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


, present in moderately hard and hard water, is reduced.




The polymers of the present invention are formed from one or more monomers such that the resulting polymer has a “hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance” throughout the polymer chain. As used herein, the term “hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance” refers to a balance of hydrophobic and hydrophilic moieties having a controlled degree of hardness or softness, as discussed above, along the polymer chain, which results in a polymer having a desired trigger property in soft, moderately hard, or hard water. As used herein, the term “soft water” refers to water having a divalent ion content of less than about 10 ppm. As used herein, the term “moderately hard water” refers to water having a divalent ion content of from about 10 to about 50 ppm. As used herein, the term “hard water” refers to water having a divalent ion content of more than about 50 ppm. By controlling the hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance and the composition of the polymer, ion-sensitive polymers having desired in-use binding strength and water-dispersibility in hard water are produced.




The polymers of the present invention may comprise any vinyl monomers capable of free radical polymerization. At least a portion of the resulting polymer comprises one or more monomer units having a hydrophobic moiety thereon and one or more monomer units having a hydrophilic moiety thereon. Suitable monomers, which provide a degree of hydrophobicity to the resulting polymer include, but are not limited to, vinyl esters, such as vinyl acetate; alkyl acrylates; acrylonitrile; methacrylonitrile; and vinyl chloride. Suitable monomers, which provide a degree of hydrophilicity to the resulting polymer include, but are not limited to, acrylamide and methacrylamide based monomers, such as acrylamide, N,N-dimethyl acrylamide, N-ethyl acrylamide, N-isopropyl acrylamide, and hydroxymethyl acrylamide; N-vinylpyrrolidinone; N-vinylforamide; hydroxyalkyl acrylates and hydroxyalkyl methacrylates, such as hydroxyethyl methacrylate and hydroxyethyl acrylate; and monomers containing one or more of the following functional groups: hydroxy, amino, ammonium, sulfonate, ether, carboxylate, carboxylic acid, amide, and sulfoamide groups. Other suitable hydrophilic and hydrophobic monomers include the vinyl monomers disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,317,063, assigned to Lion Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.




The amount of hydrophobic monomer used to produce the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention may vary depending on the desired properties in the resulting polymer. Desirably, the mole percent of hydrophobic monomer in the ion-sensitive polymer is up to about 70 mol %. More desirably, the mole percent of hydrophobic monomer in the ion-sensitive polymer is from about 15 to about 50 mol %. Most desirably, the mole percent of hydrophobic monomer in the ion-sensitive polymer is from about 25 to about 40 mol %.




The ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention may have an average molecular weight, which varies depending on the ultimate use of the polymer. Desirably, the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention have a weight average molecular weight ranging from about 10,000 to about 5,000,000. More desirably, the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention have a weight average molecular weight ranging from about 25,000 to about 2,000,000.




The ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention may be prepared according to a variety of polymerization methods, preferably a solution polymerization method. Suitable solvents for the polymerization method include, but are not limited to, lower alcohols such as methanol, ethanol and propanol; a mixed solvent of water and one or more lower alcohols mentioned above; and a mixed solvent of water and one or more lower ketones such as acetone or methyl ethyl ketone.




In the polymerization method, any polymerization initiator may be used. Selection of a particular initiator may depend on a number of factors including, but not limited to, the polymerization temperature, the solvent, and the monomers used. Suitable polymerization initiators for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, 2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile, 2,2′-azobis(2-methylbutyronitrile), 2,2′-azobis(2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile), 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane)dihydrochloride, 2,2′-azobis(N,N′-dimethyleneisobutylamidine), potassium persulfate, ammonium persulfate, and aqueous hydrogen peroxide. The amount of polymerization initiator may range from about 0.01 to 5 wt % based on the total weight of monomer present.




The polymerization temperature may vary depending on the polymerization solvent, monomers, and initiator used, but in general, ranges from about 20° C. to about 90° C. Polymerization time generally ranges from about 2 to about 8 hours.




In one embodiment of the present invention, hydrophilic monomers, such as acrylic acid or methacrylic acid, are incorporated into the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention along with one or more sulfonate-containing monomers. The sulfonate anion of these monomers are softer than carboxylate anion since the negative charge of the sulfonate anion is delocalized over three oxygen atoms and a larger sulfur atom, as oppose to only two oxygen atoms and a smaller carbon atom in the carboxylate anion. These monomers, containing the softer sulfonate anion, are less interactive with multivalent ions present in hard water, particularly Ca


2+


and Mg


2+


ions. Suitable sulfonate-containing monomers include, but are not limited to, sodium salt of styrenesulfonic acid (NaSS), 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid (AMPS), sodium salt of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid (NaAMPS), vinylsulfonic acid, and sodium salt of vinylsulfonic acid. To maintain the hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance of the ion-sensitive polymer, one or more hydrophobic monomers are added to the polymer.




In a further embodiment of the present invention, ion-sensitive polymers are produced from four monomers: acrylic acid, AMPS, butyl acrylate, and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate. Desirably, the monomers are present in ion-sensitive polymer at the following mole percents: acrylic acid, about 50 to less than 67 mol %; AMPS, greater than 0 to about 10 mol %; butyl acrylate, about 15 to about 28 mol %; and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, about 7 to about 15 mol %. More desirably, the monomers are present in ion-sensitive polymer at the following mole percents: acrylic acid, about 57 to about 66 mol %; AMPS, about 1 to about 6 mol %; butyl acrylate, about 15 to about 28 mol %; and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, about 7 to about 13 mol %.




In order to further fine tune the hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance of the ion-sensitive polymers, at least a portion of the acid moieties, if present, along the polymer chain may be neutralized. For example, the above-described ion-sensitive polymer comprising four distinct monomers may be partially or wholly neutralized to convert some or all of the AMPS to NaAMPS. Any inorganic base or organic base may be used as a neutralizing agent to neutralize the acid component of the ion-sensitive polymers. Examples of neutralizing agents include, but are not limited to, inorganic bases such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, lithium hydroxide and sodium carbonate, and amines such as monoethanolamine, diethanolamine, diethylaminoethanol, ammonia, trimethylamine, triethylamine, tripropylamine, morpholine. Preferred neutralizing agents include ethanolamines, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, or a combination thereof.




In a further embodiment of the present invention, the above-described ion-sensitive polymers are used as a binder material for flushable and/or non-flushable products. In order to be effective as a binder material in flushable products throughout the United States, the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention remain stable and maintain their integrity while dry or in high concentrations of monovalent and/or multivalent ions, but become soluble in water containing up to about 200 ppm Ca


2+


ions. Desirably, the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention are insoluble in a salt solution containing at least about 0.3 weight percent of one or more inorganic and/or organic salts containing monovalent and/or multivalent ions. More desirably, the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention are insoluble in a salt solution containing from about 0.3 wt % to about 5.0 wt % of one or more inorganic and/or organic salts containing monovalent and/or multivalent ions. Even more desirably, the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention are insoluble in a salt solution containing from about 0.5 wt % to about 3.0 wt % of one or more inorganic and/or organic salts containing monovalent and/or multivalent ions. Suitable monovalent and/or multivalent ions include, but are not limited to, Na


+


ions, K


+


ions, Li


+


ions, NH


4




+


ions, Cl





ions, Ca


2+


ions, Mg


2+


ions, Zn


2+


ions, CO


3




2−


ions, and a combination thereof.




Based on a recent study conducted by the American Chemical Society, water hardness across the United States varies greatly, with CaCO


3


concentration ranging from near zero for soft water to about 500 ppm CaCO


3


(about 200 ppm Ca


2+


ion) for very hard water. To ensure polymer dispersibility across the country, the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention are desirably soluble in water containing up to about 50 ppm Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


ions. More desirably, the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention are soluble in water containing up to about 100 ppm Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


ions. Even more desirably, the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention are soluble in water containing up to about 150 ppm Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


ions. Even more desirably, the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention are soluble in water containing up to about 200 ppm Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


ions.




The binder formulations of the present invention may be applied to any fibrous substrate. The binders are particularly suitable for use in water-dispersible products. Suitable fibrous substrates include, but are not limited to, nonwoven and woven fabrics. In many embodiments, particularly personal care products, preferred substrates are nonwoven fabrics. As used herein, the term “nonwoven fabric” refers to a fabric that has a structure of individual fibers or filaments randomly arranged in a mat-like fashion. Nonwoven fabrics can be made from a variety of processes including, but not limited to, air-laid processes, wet-laid processes, hydroentangling processes, staple fiber carding and bonding, and solution spinning.




The binder composition may be applied to the fibrous substrate by any known process of application. Suitable processes for applying the binder material include, but are not limited to, printing, spraying, impregnating or by any other technique. The amount of binder composition may be metered and distributed uniformly within the fibrous substrate or may be non-uniformly distributed within the fibrous substrate. The binder composition may be distributed throughout the entire fibrous substrate or it may be distributed within a multiplicity of small closely spaced areas. In most embodiments, uniform distribution of binder composition is desired.




For ease of application to the fibrous substrate, the binder may be dissolved in water, or in a non-aqueous solvent such as methanol, ethanol, acetone, or the like, with water being the preferred solvent. The amount of binder dissolved in the solvent may vary depending on the polymer used and the fabric application. Desirably, the binder solution contains up to about 25 percent by weight of binder composition solids. More desirably, the binder solution contains from about 10 to 20 percent by weight of binder composition solids. Plasticizers, perfumes, coloring agents, antifoams, bactericides, surface active agents, thickening agents, fillers, tackifiers, detackifiers, and similar additives can be incorporated into the solution of binder components if so desired.




Once the binder composition is applied to the substrate, the substrate is dried-by any conventional means. Once dry, the coherent fibrous substrate exhibits improved tensile strength when compared to the tensile strength of the untreated wet-laid or dry-laid substrates, and yet has the ability to rapidly “fall apart”, or disintegrate when placed in soft or hard water having a relatively low monovalent and/or multivalent ionic concentration and agitated. For example, the dry tensile strength of the fibrous substrate may be increased by at least 25 percent as compared to the dry tensile strength of the untreated substrate not containing the binder. More particularly, the dry tensile strength of the fibrous substrate may be increase by at least 100 percent as compared to the dry tensile strength of the untreated substrate not containing the binder. Even more particularly, the dry tensile strength of the fibrous substrate may be increased by at least 500 percent as compared to the dry tensile strength of the untreated substrate not containing the binder.




A desirable feature of the present invention is that the improvement in tensile strength is effected where the amount of binder composition present, “add-on”, in the resultant fibrous substrate represents only a small portion, by weight of the entire substrate. The amount of “add-on” can vary for a particular application; however, the optimum amount of “add-on” results in a fibrous substrate which has integrity while in use and also quickly disperses when agitated in water. For example, the binder components typically are from about 5 to about 65 percent, by weight, of the total weight of the substrate. More particularly, the binder components may be from about 10 to about 35 percent, by weight, of the total weight of the substrate. Even more particularly, the binder components may be from about 10 to about 25 percent, by weight, of the total weight of the substrate.




The nonwoven fabrics of the present invention have good in-use tensile strength, as well as, ion triggerability. Desirably, the nonwoven fabrics of the present invention are abrasion resistant and retain significant tensile strength in aqueous solutions containing greater than about 0.5 weight percent NaCl or a mixture of monovalent and multivalent ions, wherein the multivalent ion concentration is greater than about 500 ppm. Yet the nonwoven fabrics are dispersible in soft to moderately hard to hard water. Because of this latter property, nonwoven fabrics of the present invention are well suited for disposable products such as sanitary napkins, diapers, and dry and premoistened wipes, which can be thrown in a flush toilet after use in any part of the world.




The fibers forming the fabrics above can be made from a variety of materials including natural fibers, synthetic fibers, and combinations thereof. The choice of fibers depends upon, for example, the intended end use of the finished fabric and fiber cost. For instance, suitable fibrous substrates may include, but are not limited to, natural fibers such as cotton, linen, jute, hemp, wool, wood pulp, etc. Similarly, regenerated cellulosic fibers such as viscose rayon and cuprammonium rayon, modified cellulosic fibers, such as cellulose acetate, or synthetic fibers such as those derived from polyesters, polyamides, polyacrylics, etc., alone or in combination with one another, may likewise be used. Blends of one or more of the above fibers may also be used if so desired.




The fiber length is important in producing the fabrics of the present invention. In some embodiments such as flushable products, fiber length is of more importance. The minimum length of the fibers depends on the method selected for forming the fibrous substrate. For example, where the fibrous substrate is formed by carding, the length of the fiber should usually be at least about 42 mm in order to insure uniformity. Where the fibrous substrate is formed by air-laid or wet-laid processes, the fiber length may desirably be about 0.2 to 6 mm. Although fibers having a length of greater than 50 mm are within the scope of the present invention, it has been determined that when a substantial quantity of fibers having a length greater than about 15 mm is placed in a flushable fabric, though the fibers will disperse and separate in water, their length tends to form “ropes” of fibers which are undesirable when flushing in home toilets. Therefore, for these products, it is desired that the fiber length be about 15 mm or less so that the fibers will not have a tendency to “rope” when they are flushed through a toilet. Although fibers of various lengths are applicable in the present invention, desirably fibers are of a length less than about 15 mm so that the fibers disperse easily from one another when in contact with water.




The fabrics of the present invention may be formed from a single layer or multiple layers. In the case of multiple layers, the layers are generally positioned in a juxtaposed or surface-to-surface relationship and all or a portion of the layers may be bound to adjacent layers. Nonwoven webs of the present invention may also be formed from a plurality of separate nonwoven webs wherein the separate nonwoven webs may be formed from single or multiple layers. In those instances where the nonwoven web includes multiple layers, the entire thickness of the nonwoven web may be subjected to a binder application or each individual layer may be separately subjected to a binder application and then combined with other layers in a juxtaposed relationship to form the finished nonwoven web.




In one embodiment, the fabric substrates of the present invention may be incorporated into cleansing and body fluid absorbent products such as sanitary napkins, diapers, surgical dressings, tissues, wet wipes, and the like. These products may include an absorbent core, comprising one or more layers of an absorbent fibrous material. The core may also comprise one or more layers of a fluid-pervious element, such as fibrous tissue, gauze, plastic netting, etc. These are generally useful as wrapping materials to hold the components of the core together. Additionally, the core may comprise a fluid-impervious element or barrier means to preclude the passage of fluid through the core and on the outer surfaces of the product. Preferably, the barrier means also is water-dispersible. A film of a polymer having substantially the same composition as the aforesaid water-dispersible binder is particularly well-suited for this purpose. In accordance with the present invention, the polymer compositions are useful for forming each of the above-mentioned product components including the layers of absorbent core, the fluid-pervious element, the wrapping materials, and the fluid-impervious element or barrier means.




The binder formulations are particularly useful for binding fibers of air-laid nonwoven fabrics. These air-laid materials are useful for body-side liners, fluid distribution materials, fluid in-take materials, such as a surge material, absorbent wrap sheet and cover stock for various water-dispersible personal care products. Air-laid materials are particularly useful for use as a premoistened wipe. The basis weights for air-laid non-woven fabrics may range from about 20 to about 200 grams per square meter (gsm) with staple fibers having a 2-3 denier and a length of about 6-15 millimeters. Surge or in-take materials need better resiliency and higher loft so staple fibers having about 6 denier or greater are used to make these products. A desirable final density for the surge or in-take materials is between about 0.025 Crams per cubic centimeter (g/cc) to about 0.050 g/cc. Fluid distribution materials may have a higher density, in the desired range of about 0.10 to about 0.20 g/cc using fibers of lower denier, most desirable fibers have a denier of less than about 1.5. Wipes generally, have a density of about 0.05 g/cc to about 0.2 g/cc and a basis weight of about 30 gsm to about 90 gsm.




One particularly interesting embodiment of the present invention is the production of premoistened wipes, or wet wipes, from the above-described ion-sensitive polymers and fibrous materials. For wipes, the nonwoven fabric is, desirably, formed from relatively short fibers, such as wood pulp fibers. The minimum length of the fibers depends on the method selected for forming the nonwoven fabric. Where the nonwoven fabric is formed by the wet or dry method, the fiber length is desirably from about 0.1 millimeters to 15 millimeters. Desirably, the nonwoven fabric of the present invention has a relatively low wet cohesive strength when it is not bonded together by an adhesive or binder material. When such nonwoven fabrics are bonded together by an adhesive, which loses its bonding strength in tap water and in sewer water, the fabric will break up readily by the agitation provided by flushing and moving through the sewer pipes.




The finished wipes may be individually packaged, preferably in a folded condition, in a moisture proof envelope or packaged in containers holding any desired number of sheets in a water-tight package with a wetting agent applied to the wipe. Relative to the weight of the dry fabric, the wipe may contain from about 10 percent to about 400 percent and desirably from about 100 percent to about 300 percent of the wetting agent. The wipe must maintain its desired characteristics over the time periods involved in warehousing, transportation, retail display and storage by the consumer. Accordingly, shelf life may range from two months to two years.




Various forms of impermeable envelopes for containing wet-packaged materials such as wipes and towelettes and the like are well known in the art. Any of these may be employed in packaging the premoistened wipes of the present invention.




In one embodiment of the present invention, wet wipes, comprising the above-described nonwoven fabric, are stored in an impermeable package and saturated with a salt solution containing greater than about 0.5 weight percent of one or more monovalent salts, such as NaCl or KCl. Desirably, the salt solution contains about 0.5 to 3.0 weight percent of one or more monovalent salts. In another embodiment, the wet wipes are saturated with a salt solution containing greater than about 500 ppm of one or more multivalent ions, such as Ca


2+


or Mg


2+


ions. In a further embodiment, the wet wipes are saturated with a salt solution containing greater than about 0.5 weight percent of one or more monovalent salts in combination with one or more multivalent ions, wherein the concentration of multivalent ions is greater than about 500 ppm. Desirably, the wet wipes possess an in-use tensile strength of at least 100 g/in, and a tensile strength of less than about 30 g/in after being soaked in water having a concentration of Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


ions of about 50 ppm for about one hour. More desirably, the wet wipes possess an in-use tensile strength of at least 300 g/in, and a tensile strength of less than about 30 g/in after being soaked in water having a concentration of Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


ions of about 50 ppm for about one hour. In a further embodiment, the wet wipes desirably possess an in-use tensile strength of at least 200 g/in, and a tensile strength of less than about 20 g/in after being soaked in water having a concentration of Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


ions of about 200 ppm for about one hour. Even more desirably, the wet wipes possess an in-use tensile strength of at least 300 g/in, and a tensile strength of less than about 20 g/in after being soaked in water having a concentration of Ca


2+


and/or Mg


2+


ions of about 200 ppm for about one hour.




The nonwoven fabrics of the present invention may also be incorporated into such body fluid absorbing products as sanitary napkins, diapers, surgical dressings, tissues and the like.




The binder is such that it will not dissolve when contacted by body fluids since the concentration of ions in the body fluids is above the level needed for dissolution. The nonwoven fabric retains its structure, softness and exhibits a toughness satisfactory for practical use. However, when brought into contact with water having a concentration of multivalent ions, such as Ca


2+


and Mg


2+


ions, of up to about 200 ppm, the binder disperses. The nonwoven fabric structure is then easily broken and dispersed in the water.




In one embodiment of the present invention, the in-use tensile strength of a nonwoven fabric is enhanced by forming the nonwoven fabric with a binder material comprising an ion sensitive polymer of the present invention and subsequently applying one or more monovalent and/or multivalent salts to the nonwoven fabric. The salt may be applied to the nonwoven fabric by any method known to those of ordinary skill in the art including, but not limited to, applying a solid powder onto the fabric and spraying a salt solution onto the fabric. The amount of salt may vary depending on a particular application. However, the amount of salt applied to the fabric is typically from about 0.1 wt % to about 10 wt % salt solids based on the total weight of the fabric. The salt-containing fabrics of the present invention may be used in a variety of fabric applications including, but not limited to, feminine pads and diapers.




Those skilled in the art will readily understand that the binder formulations and fibrous substrates of the present invention may be advantageously employed in the preparation of a wide variety of products, including but not limited to, absorbent personal care products designed to be contacted with body fluids. Such products may only comprise a single layer of the fibrous substrate or may comprise a combination of elements as described above. Although the binder formulations and fibrous substrates of the present invention are particularly suited for personal care products, the binder formulations and fibrous substrates may be advantageously employed in a wide variety of consumer products.




The present invention is further illustrated by the following examples, which are not to be construed in any way as imposing limitations upon the scope thereof. On the contrary, it is to be clearly understood that resort may be had to various other embodiments, modifications, and equivalents thereof which, after reading the description herein, may suggest themselves to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention and/or the scope of the appended claims.











EXAMPLE 1




Preparation of Ion-Sensitive Polymers




Acrylic acid (43.3 g, 0.60 mol), AMPS (10.7 g, 0.052 mol), butyl acrylate (35.2 g, 0.27 mol), and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (20 g, 0.11 mol) were dissolved in 55 g of acetone/water (70/30) mixture. An initiator, 2,2-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) (0.51 g, 3.1×10


−3


mol), was dissolved in 20 ml of acetone. The monomer solution was deoxygenated by bubbling N


2


through the solution for 20 minutes. To a 1000 ml three-neck round bottom flask, equipped with a condenser, two addition funnels and a magnetic stirrer, was added 120 g of an acetone/water (70/30) mixture. The solvent was heated to gentle reflux under nitrogen. Monomers and initiator were added simultaneously from the addition funnels over a period of two hours. Polymerization was allowed to proceed for an additional two hours, at the end of which, the addition funnels and condenser were replaced with a distillation head and a mechanical stir rod to remove acetone. A steady stream of N


2


was kept during distillation while the temperature was increased gradually from about 65° C. to about 90° C. When the distillation was completed, 400 g of deionized water was added to reduce the viscosity of the polymer solution. A hazy, but uniform solution was obtained.




A total of twelve polymers (Samples 1-12) were synthesized using the above-described procedure. NaOH (2.1 g, 0.052 mol) in 20 ml of water was added at room temperature to neutralize the AMPS component in Samples 3-7 and 9-12. The compositions of Samples 1-12 are summarized in Table 1 below. All percentages are given in mole percent.












TABLE 1











Ion-Sensitive Polymer Compositions
















Sample




% AMPS




% NaAMPS




% AA




% BA




% EHA



















1




1.5




0.0




65.5




22.5




10.5






2




3.0




0.0




64.0




22.5




10.5






3




0.0




3.0




64.0




22.5




10.5






4




0.0




3.5




63.5




22.5




10.5






5




0.0




3.9




62.1




24.6




9.4






6




0.0




4.0




57.0




26.5




12.5






7




0.0




4.2




64.7




19.7




11.4






8




5.0




0.0




62.0




22.5




10.5






9




0.0




5.0




58.0




26.5




10.5






10 




0.0




4.0




63.0




21.5




11.5






11 




0.0




5.0




59.0




25.5




10.5






12 




0.0




5.0




60.0




24.5




10.5














COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1




Comparative Testing of a Polymer Supplied from Lion Corporation




A Lion polymer was supplied from Lion Corporation and tested as outlined in the examples below. The polymer was one of the polymers disclosed and claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,312,883, assigned to Lion Corporation.




COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2




Preparation of a Lion Corporation Polymer




A Lion polymer was produced using the polymerization procedure outlined in Example 2 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,312,883. The following monomers were used: acrylic acid (50 g, 0.69 mol), butyl acrylate (25 g, 0.20 mol), and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (25 g, 0.14 mol). The polymer was neutralized with 0.1 mol sodium hydroxide.




EXAMPLE 2




Improved Hard Water Sensitivity of Unneutralized Polymer Compared to the Lion Polymers




The sensitivity of the unneutralized polymers of Example 1 and the Lion polymers of Comparative Examples 1 and 2 to divalent cations present in hard water was measured. Samples 1, 2, and 8 of Example 1 and the Lion polymer were placed in a number of CaCl


2


solutions with a Ca


2+


concentration varying from 100 to 1000 ppm. Following soaking for an hour, the solubility of each polymer was noted. The solubility results are given below in Table 2.












TABLE 2











Solubility Results













Solubility in Ca


2+

















Sample




100 ppm




200 ppm




300 ppm




1000 ppm









Sample 1




1




2




3




5






Sample 2




1




2




2




5






Sample 8




1




1




1




5






Comp. Ex. 1




4




5




5




5






Comp. Ex. 2




2




4




4




5











Note:










1: very light cloudiness;










2: light cloudiness;










3: moderate cloudiness (cloudy, but light still able to penetrate through solution);










4: severe cloudiness (milky);










5: heavy precipitaion (solid gel formation).













The results of Table 2 indicate that the AMPS-containing polymers were much less sensitive to Ca


2+


ion concentration relative to the Lion polymers. However, with a sufficient amount of Ca


2+


ion present (about 1000 ppm), all of the polymers will “salt out” of the solution. In other words, all of the polymers will be insoluble in the 1000 ppm Ca


2+


ion solution.




A further dissolution experiment supported these results. The five precipitates were then removed from the 1000 ppm Ca


2+


solutions and placed in deionized water. Samples 1, 2 and 8, which contained AMPS, redissolved in the deionized water; however, the Lion polymers (from Comparative Examples 1-2) did not due to irreversible crosslinking of the sodium acrylate sites.




Reduction in the ion sensitivity of AMPS-containing polymers toward multivalent ions was found to be not limited to Ca


2+


ions. In a separate experiment, Samples 2 and 8 along with the Lion polymers of Comparative Examples 1-2 were precipitated in a ZnCl


2


solution having a Zn


2+


ion concentration of 5000 ppm. The precipitates of Sample 2 and 8 redissolved in water, but the Lion polymers did not. This suggested that, in general, the AMPS-containing polymers were less sensitive toward divalent cations and did not form a permanent cross-linking structure.




EXAMPLE 3




Testing the Binding Strength of the AMPS-Containing Polymers Compared to the Lion Polymer




The binding strength of the AMPS-containing polymers was tested in 100 and 200 ppm Ca


2+


solutions. The five polymers (Samples 1, 2 and 8 and the Lion polymers of Comparative Examples 1 and 2) were applied via a #20 wire-wound rod to five identical water-dispersible, wet-laid non-woven webs composed of BFF rayon fibers (1.5 d×25 mm). The fabric samples were dried in a forced-air oven at 50° C. The add-on level was between about 55 and 61 wt % based on the total weight of the fabric. The non-woven sheets were cut to provide 1 inch×3 inch strips from each sheet. The dry samples were put directly into Ca


2+


ion solutions. The strips were tested for tensile strength after soaking in solution for an hour according to the following test method.




The strips were mounted onto a minitensile tester with a 2″ grip separation. The strength was tested at a speed of 18 cm/min and the maximum peak load was recorded. The results are summarized in Table 3 below.












TABLE 3











Tensile Strength














Strength (g/in)








in Ca


2+


(ppm) Solutions















Sample




100 ppm




200 ppm



















Sample 1




0




360







Sample 2




0




361







Sample 8




0




0







Comp. Ex. 1




292




529







Comp. Ex. 2




281




567















The results of Table 3 again illustrate the reduced sensitivity of AMPS-containing polymers toward Ca


2+


ions. Binders composed of Sample 1 and 2 were dispersible in 100 ppm Ca


2+


solutions and a binder composed of Sample 8 was dispersible in solution containing up to 200 ppm Ca


2+


. These polymers showed a significant improvement over the Lion polymers.




EXAMPLE 4




Adjusting the pH of Solutions Containing the Ion-Sensitive Polymers




The solution pH of Samples 1, 2 and 8 of Example 1 were found to be quite low, ranging from 1.7 for Sample 8 to 2.1 for Sample 1, due to the presence of sulfonic acid groups. Low pH is undesirable in applications such as wet wipes, not only because it causes yellowing of the pulp substrate in the drying process, but it may irritate the skin during use. To adjust the pH of these solutions, equimolar amounts of NaOH were added to neutralize the AMPS. The pH of the solutions rose to about 3.1-3.3, a more desirable pH range for skin health, which also eliminates yellowing of the fibrous substrate during drying.




EXAMPLE 5




Effect of Neutralization on the Dispersion Rate of Ion-Sensitive Polymers




Five polymer solutions containing three polymers of Example 1 (Samples 1-3) and the Lion polymers of Comparative Examples 1-2 were applied via a #20 wire-wound rod to five identical water-dispersible, wet-laid non-woven webs composed of BFF rayon fibers (1.5 d×25 mm). The fabric samples were dried in a forced-air oven at 50° C. The add-on level was between about 55 and 61 wt % based on the total weight of the fabric. The non-woven sheets were cut to provide 1 inch×3 inch strips from each sheet.




The strips were placed in deionized water. The time of dispersion (i.e., the time at which each fabric sample had substantially zero tensile strength) was recorded. Results are given in Table 4 below.












TABLE 4











Time of Dispersion in Deionized Water














Fabric Sample




Time to Disperse











1




>2 hours







2




>2 hours







3




˜10 minutes







Comp. Ex. 1




˜3 minutes







Comp. Ex. 2




˜3 minutes















As shown in Table 4, the strips containing Lion polymer lost all of their strength in about three minutes, indicating good dispersibility in deionized water. The strips formed from the AMPS-containing polymers had poor dispersibility in deionized water. However, the strips formed from the NaAMPS-containing polymer had good dispersibility in deionized water.




In order to determine the effect of Ca


2+


ion concentration on the dispersibility of Sample 3, strips of Sample 3 were tested for tensile strength after soaking for up to one hour in solutions containing from 0 to 200 ppm Ca


2+


ion. The sample was found to be stable in a 0.9 wt % NaCl solution, and dispersable in deionized water in less than 10 minutes. In a 200 ppm Ca


2+


solution, the strip had an initial strength of about 275 g/in. In a 100 ppm Ca


2+


solution, the strip had the strength of less than about 50 g/in after one hour and became unrecognizable after two hours. It was concluded that while neutralization increased the dispersion rate significantly, it did not negatively alter the strength characteristics and Ca


2+


sensitivity of the ion-sensitive polymers of the present invention.




EXAMPLE 6




Water-Dispersibility Testing of Nonwoven Fabrics




Ten polymer solutions containing eight polymers of Example 1 (Samples 1 and 3-9) and the Lion polymers of Comparative Examples 1-2 were applied via a #20 wire-wound rod to ten identical water-dispersible, wet-laid non-woven webs composed of BFF rayon fibers (1.5 d×25 mm). The fabric samples were dried in a forced-air oven at 50° C. The add-on level was between about 55 and 61 wt % based on the total weight of the fabric. The non-woven sheets were cut to provide 1 inch×3 inch strips from each sheet. The strips were tested for water-dispersibility according to the following procedure.




The 1 inch×3 inch strips from the ten nonwoven sheets were soaked in solutions having a Ca


2+


ion concentration from 100 to 1000 ppm for about one hour. The samples were removed from the solutions and tested for tensile strength in the machine direction using the procedure outlined above. Samples having a low tensile strength showed good water-dispersibility. Test results are given below in Table 5.












TABLE 5











Tensile Strength of Jon-Sensitive Polymers in Ca


2+


Ion






Solutions (ppm Ca


2+


Ion) (g/in)















Fabric Sample




100 ppm




200 ppm




500 ppm




1000 ppm


















1




0




360








3




0




275




498






4




0




39




471




445






5




0




327




522




441






6




310




482




529






7




0




0




301




335






8




0




0






9




0




21




510




503






Comp. Ex. 1




292




529






Comp. Ex. 2




281




567




813




799














As shown in Table 5, the tensile strength of the nonwoven fabrics formed from the AMPS-containing or NaAMPS-containing polymers, in most cases, decreased as the concentration of Ca


2+


ion decreased. By controlling the hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance in the composition of the polymeric binder, nonwoven fabrics were produced having good water-dispersibility as identified by a low tensile strength in solutions having a Ca


2+


ion concentration of 100 or 200 ppm (see Samples of Polymer 4, 7, 8, and 9 above).




In contrast, the water-dispersibility or ion-triggerability of the Lion polymers was found to be unacceptable for flushable applications. The nonwoven fabrics formed from the Lion polymers had an extremely high tensile strength (>281 g/in) in solutions having a Ca


2+


ion concentration of 100 or 200 ppm. Given these results, nonwoven fabrics formed from the Lion polymers would not be suitable in flushable products in areas of hard water.




EXAMPLE 7




Variation of the Composition of NaAMPS-Containing Polymers to Affect Tensile Strength in NaCl Solutions and Dispersibility in Ca


2+


Solutions




Ten nonwoven fabrics comprising binder materials formed from eight polymers of Example 1 (Samples 4-7 and 9-12) and the Lion polymers of Comparative Examples 1-2 were prepared as in Example 7. In-use strength and dispersibility of the NaAMPS-containing fabrics and the Lion polymer-containing fabrics were measured as described above.




The 1 inch×3 inch strips from the ten nonwoven sheets were tested on a machine using the test method described above. In-use strength of the polymeric binder was measured as the tensile strength in the machine direction of each sample tested in a 0.9 wt % NaCl salt solution or a 1.5 wt % NaCl salt solution after soaking overnight at room temperature, unless otherwise indicated.




To determine the dispersibility of some of the pre-soaked samples, the sample was transferred after soaking in one of the above salt solutions to a solution containing a Ca


2+


ion concentration from 100 to 200 ppm Ca


2+


for an hour, and tested for tensile strength. Samples having a low tensile strength showed good water-dispersibility. Test results are given below in Table 6.












TABLE 6











Tensile Strength of Ion-Sensitive Polymers in Ca


2−


Ion






Solutions (ppm Ca


2+


Ion) and NaCl Solutions (g/in)
















Fabric




0.9 wt %




1.5 wt %




100 ppm




150 ppm




200 ppm






Sample




NaCl




NaCl




Ca


2+






Ca


2+






Ca


2+





















4*




0




364




0





39






5*




0




350




0





327






6*




315





310





482






7*




0




322




0





0






9**




0




449






62






10**




0




378





52




155






11**





442






0






12**





386






0






Comp. Ex.




529





292





529






1*






Comp. Ex.




375




645




699





698






2**











Note:










*Samples were tested after 1 hour soaking in the designated solution.










**Dry samples were pre-soaked overnight in a NaCl solution, then put directly into a Ca


2+


solution, and tested after 1 hour.













As shown in Table 6, the fabric samples formed from NaAMPS-containing polymers had very little tensile strength in 0.9 wt % NaCl solution. In contrast, fabric samples formed from the Lion polymers had high tensile strength. In the 1.5 wt % NaCl solution, fabric samples formed from NaAMPS-containing polymers had good tensile strength. The increase in tensile strength may be attributed to an increase in the salting-out effect of the NaAMPS-containing polymers.




Further, Table 6 shows that most of the fabric samples formed from NaAMPS-containing polymers lost all or a significant portion of their tensile strength after soaking in a 100 ppm Ca


2+


ion solution. Also, fabric samples 11 and 12 lost their tensile strength after being transferred to and soaking in a 200 ppm Ca


2+


ion solution, indicating good water dispersibility. In contrast, fabric samples formed from the Lion polymers did not lose their tensile strength in 100 ppm or 200 ppm Ca


2+


ion solutions, indicating poor dispersibility.




EXAMPLE 8




Effect of Divalent Ion Salts on the In-Use Tensile Strength and Water-Dispersibility of Nonwoven Fabrics Bound with NaAMPS-Containing Polymers




Example 7 indicates that NaAMPS-containing polymers, that are dispersible in 200 ppm Ca


2+


solution, have acceptable in-use tensile strength only in higher NaCl concentrations (greater than 0.9 wt % NaCl). In order to possibly increase the tensile strength of these binders at a lower NaCl concentration, salts containing divalent cations such as Ca


2+


and Zn


2+


were added to the NaCl solutions because of their higher salting-out capability. Samples 3-7 and 9 of Example 1 were used as binder material for nonwoven fabrics comprising BFF rayon fibers as described above. Tensile strength of the fabrics was measured after soaking in a variety of solutions. Results of the testing are summarized in Table 7 below.












TABLE 7











Tensile Strength of Ion-Sensitive Polymers in Mixed






Salts Solutions (g/in)

















500




1000




0.9% NaCl




0.9% NaCl




0.9% NaCl






Fabric




ppm




ppm




with 500




with 1000




with 500






Sample




Ca


2+






Ca


2+






ppm Ca


2+






ppm Ca


2+






ppm Zn


2+











3




498





498








4




471




445





420




335






5




522




441





432






6




529





573






7




301




335




379




335




304






9




 0




503




585




461




379














The results of Table 7 indicate that the NaAMPS-containing polymers are stable in all test solutions, demonstrating the effectiveness of divalent ions in stabilizing the polymer, even at low NaCl concentrations. In some cases, the polymers may be stabilized with the divalent ion salt alone. As further shown in Table 7 in comparison with Table 6, Ca


2+


ions are more effective at stabilizing the polymers than Na


+


ions or Zn


2+


ions, as demonstrated by the higher tensile strength values in the NaCl solutions containing Ca


2+


ions as opposed to the NaCl solutions containing Zn


2+


ions in the comparable concentration level.




EXAMPLE 9




Solubility of Ion-Triggerable Polymers as Measured by Percentage Weight Loss in a Divalent Ion Salt Solution




Films were produced from three polymers of Example 1 (Samples 9, 10, and 12) and the Lion polymer of Comparative Example 1. Weighed samples of each film were placed in a 1.5 wt % NaCl solution for 24 hours. The samples were removed and weighed to determine the percent weight loss of each sample. Similarly, weighed samples of each film were placed in a solution containing 200 ppm Ca


2+


/Mg


2+


ions (2 parts Ca


2+


to 1 part Mg


2+


) and agitated by shaking for about 2 hours. The samples were removed and weighed to determine the percent weight loss of each sample.












TABLE 8











Percent Weight Loss of Films of Ion-Sensitive Polymers






in Salts Solutions
















% Wt. Loss in 1.5%




% Wt. Loss in 200







Sample




NaCl




ppm Ca


2+


/Mg


2+





















 9




0




38







10




0




34







12




0




100







Comp. Ex. 1




0




5















All five samples show 0% weight loss after being soaked in 1.5% NaCl for 24 hours, indicating that all samples were substantially insoluble in the NaCl solution. In the Ca


2+


/Mg


2+


solution, the Lion polymer had very little weight loss, indicating that the Lion polymer was substantially insoluble in the solution. However, the polymers of the present invention had a weight loss of at least 34% in the Ca


2+


/Mg


2+


solution, indicating that the samples formed from the ion-triggerable polymers of the present invention were soluble in the solution. Moreover, Sample 12 had a weight loss of 100%, indicating substantial solubility in the Ca


2+


/Mg


2+


solution.




The results of Table 8 further confirm the results of Example 6. In particular, the water-dispersibility or ion-triggerability of the Lion polymer was found to be unacceptable for flushable applications, especially flushable applications in areas of hard water. However, the water-dispersibility or ion-triggerability of the polymers of the present invention was found to be acceptable for flushable applications, including flushable applications in areas of hard water.




The above disclosed examples are preferred embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way. Various modifications and other embodiments and uses of the disclosed water-dispersible polymers, apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, are also considered to be within the scope of the present invention.















EXHIBIT A














Attorney and/or Agent




Registration No.


















Roger T. Frost




22,176







Charles Y. Lackey




22,707







Anthony B. Askew




24,154







John M. Harrington




25,592







Donald R. Andersen




28,280







Robert E. Richards




29,105







John S. Pratt




29,476







A. Jose Cortina




29,733







James L. Ewing, IV




30,630







Stephen M. Schaetzel




31,418







James Dean Johnson




31,771







Charles W. Calkins




31,814







Larry A. Roberts




31,871







Jamie L. Greene




32,467







George T. Marcou




33,014







Dean W. Russell




33,452







Richard T. Peterson




35,320







Charles T. Simmons




35,359







Tracy W. Druce




35,493







Eleanor M. Musick




35,623







Nora M. Tocups




35,717







Bruce D. Gray




35,799







Theodore R. Harper




35,890







Geoff L. Sutcliffe




36,348







Pat Winston Kennedy




36,970







David P. Lecroy




37,869







Suzanne Seavello Shope




37,933







Mitchell G. Stockwell




39,389







Jeffery B. Arnold




39,540







Houri Khalilian




39,546







Mary Anthony Merchant




39,771







Brenda Ozaki Holmes




40,339







Michael J. Turton




40,852







Yoncha L. Kundupogln




41,130







George A. Willinghan, III




41,377







Alana G. Kriegsman




41,747







J. Steven Gardner




41,772







Theodore M. Green




41,801







Joni Stutman




42,173







Heather D. Carmichael




42,389







Thomas A. Corrado




42,439







John K. McDonald




42,860







Sima Singadia Kulkarni




43,732







Camilla Camp Williams




43,992







Christopher J. Chan




44,070







John William Ball, Jr.




44,433







Dawn-Marie Bey




44,442







Tiep H. Nguyen




44,465







John M. Briski




44,562







Michael J. Dimino




44,657







Kristin L. Johnson




44,807







Paul E. Knowlton




44,842







J. Jason Link




44,874







Cheryl L. Huseman




45,392







Vaibhav P. Kadaba




45,865







Greg Moldafsky




46,514







J. Michael Boggs




46,563







Michael K. Dixon




46,665







Tywanda L. Harris




46,758







Kristin D. Mallatt




46,895







Cynthia B. Rothschild




47,040







John C. Alemanni




47,384







Geoffrey K. Gavin




47,591







Janina Malone




47,768







Aleta A. Mills




47,794







Robert M. Stevens




47,972







Christopher L. Bernard




48,234







Jeffrey S. Bernard




50,020







Ralph E. Gaskins




P50,136














Claims
  • 1. A nonwoven fabric comprising fibrous material and a binder material, wherein the binder material comprises a binder composition comprising an ion-sensitive polymer formed from: acrylic acid; AMPS or NaAMPS; butyl acrylate; and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate; further wherein the polymer is insoluble in a neutral salt solution containing at least about 0.3 weight percent salt, said salt comprising one or more monovalent or multivalent ions; and wherein the polymer is soluble in tap water containing one or more multivalent ions.
  • 2. A nonwoven fabric comprising fibrous material and a binder material, wherein the binder material comprises a binder composition for binding fibrous material into an integral web, said binder composition comprising an ion-sensitive polymer formed from four monomers: acrylic acid, AMPS or NaAMPS, butyl acrylate, and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate; wherein the polymer is insoluble in a neutral salt solution containing at least about 0.3 weight percent salt, said salt comprising one or more monovalent or multivalent ions; and wherein the polymer is soluble in tap water containing from about 15 ppm to about 500 ppm of one or more multivalent ions.
  • 3. A fibrous substrate comprising:fibrous material; and a binder composition for binding said fibrous material into an integral web, said binder composition comprising an ion-sensitive polymer formed from: acrylic acid; AMPS or NaMPS; butyl acrylate; and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, wherein the polymer is insoluble in a neutral salt solution containing at least about 0.3 weight percent salt, said salt comprising one or more monovalent or multivalent ions; and wherein the polymer is soluble in tap water containing from about 15 ppm to about 500 ppm of one or more multivalent ions.
  • 4. The fibrous substrate of claim 3, wherein the polymer is insoluble in a neutral salt solution containing at least about 0.3 weight percent salt, said salt comprising one or more monovalent or multivalent ions; and wherein the polymer is soluble in tap water containing from about 15 ppm to about 200 ppm of one or more multivalent ions.
  • 5. The fibrous substrate of claim 4, wherein the polymer is insoluble in a neutral salt solution containing at least about 0.3 weight percent salt, said salt comprising one or more monovalent or multivalent ions; and wherein the polymer is soluble in tap water containing from about 15 ppm to about 100 ppm of one or more multivalent ions.
  • 6. The fibrous substrate of claim 4, wherein the polymer is insoluble in a neutral salt solution containing at least about 0.3 weight percent salt, said salt comprising one or more monovalent or multivalent ions; and wherein the polymer is soluble in tap water containing from about 15 ppm to about 50 ppm of one or more multivalent ions.
  • 7. The fibrous substrate of claim 3, wherein the polymer is insoluble in a neutral salt solution containing from about 0.5 weight percent to about 5.0 weight percent of the salt.
  • 8. The fibrous substrate of claim 7, wherein the polymer is insoluble in a neutral salt solution containing from about 0.5 weight percent to about 3.0 weight percent of the salt.
  • 9. A water-dispersible article comprising the fibrous substrate of claim 3.
  • 10. The water-dispersible article of claim 9, wherein the water-dispersible article comprises a body-side liner, fluid distribution material, fluid in-take material, absorbent wrap sheet, cover stock, or wet wipe.
  • 11. A wet wipe comprising the fibrous substrate of claim 3.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application is a divisional application of copending of patent application U.S. Ser. No. 09/223,999 filed on Dec. 31, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,423,804.

US Referenced Citations (359)
Number Name Date Kind
2185789 Jacque Jan 1940 A
2265913 Lilienfeld Dec 1941 A
2306451 Lilienfeld Dec 1942 A
2831852 Savage Apr 1958 A
3097991 Miller et al. Jul 1963 A
3099067 Merriam et al. Jul 1963 A
RE25880 Cline Oct 1965 E
3340327 Spellberg Sep 1967 A
3388082 Rodgers Jun 1968 A
3406688 Cubitt Oct 1968 A
3407164 Schmidt Oct 1968 A
3435705 Harmon Apr 1969 A
3453261 Scherff Jul 1969 A
3461193 Gilardi Aug 1969 A
3480016 Costanza et al. Nov 1969 A
3515325 Kalwaites Jun 1970 A
3521638 Parrish Jul 1970 A
3546755 Lynch, Jr. Dec 1970 A
3554788 Fechillas Jan 1971 A
3561447 Alexander Feb 1971 A
3564677 Kalwaites Feb 1971 A
3577586 Kalwaites et al. May 1971 A
3582519 Gomsi Jun 1971 A
3595454 Kalwaites Jul 1971 A
3606887 Roeder Sep 1971 A
3616797 Champaigne, Jr. et al. Nov 1971 A
3639199 Brandts et al. Feb 1972 A
3654064 Laumann Apr 1972 A
3656672 Kalwaites Apr 1972 A
3663348 Liloi et al. May 1972 A
3665923 Champaigne, Jr. May 1972 A
3670069 Mitchell et al. Jun 1972 A
3670731 Harron Jun 1972 A
3683919 Ells Aug 1972 A
3692725 Duchane Sep 1972 A
3702610 Sheppard et al. Nov 1972 A
3709876 Glomski Jan 1973 A
3712847 Rasmussen Jan 1973 A
3719540 Hall Mar 1973 A
3753826 Plummer Aug 1973 A
3800797 Tunc Apr 1974 A
3804092 Tunc Apr 1974 A
3808165 Duchane Apr 1974 A
3838695 Comerford et al. Oct 1974 A
3839319 Greminger Oct 1974 A
3859125 Miller et al. Jan 1975 A
3865918 Mitchell et al. Feb 1975 A
3867324 Clendinning Feb 1975 A
3867549 Costello et al. Feb 1975 A
3869310 Fukushima et al. Mar 1975 A
3881210 Drach et al. May 1975 A
3881487 Schrading May 1975 A
3882869 Hanke May 1975 A
3897782 Tunc Aug 1975 A
3911917 Hanke Oct 1975 A
3913579 Srinivasan et al. Oct 1975 A
3923592 George et al. Dec 1975 A
3926951 Lindenfors et al. Dec 1975 A
3939836 Tunc Feb 1976 A
3946158 Leclercq et al. Mar 1976 A
3950578 Laumann Apr 1976 A
3951900 Bath Apr 1976 A
3952745 Duncan Apr 1976 A
3976734 Dunning et al. Aug 1976 A
3978257 Ring Aug 1976 A
RE28957 Drelich et al. Sep 1976 E
3991754 Gertzman Nov 1976 A
4002171 Taft Jan 1977 A
4005251 Tunc Jan 1977 A
4009313 Crawford et al. Feb 1977 A
4011871 Taft Mar 1977 A
4014635 Kroyer Mar 1977 A
4032993 Coquard et al. Jul 1977 A
4035540 Gander Jul 1977 A
4041203 Brock et al. Aug 1977 A
4073777 O'Neill et al. Feb 1978 A
4082886 Butterworth et al. Apr 1978 A
4084033 Drelich Apr 1978 A
4084591 Takebe et al. Apr 1978 A
4092454 Domoto et al. May 1978 A
4099976 Kraskin et al. Jul 1978 A
4100324 Anderson et al. Jul 1978 A
4112167 Dake et al. Sep 1978 A
4117187 Adams et al. Sep 1978 A
4136798 Oberstein Jan 1979 A
4141713 Ammannati et al. Feb 1979 A
4154883 Elias May 1979 A
4164595 Adams et al. Aug 1979 A
4186233 Krajewski et al. Jan 1980 A
4201216 Mattei May 1980 A
4220244 Elmore Sep 1980 A
4226753 Lewis et al. Oct 1980 A
4242408 Evani et al. Dec 1980 A
4245744 Daniels et al. Jan 1981 A
4251416 Palmer Feb 1981 A
4258849 Miller Mar 1981 A
4301203 Keuchel Nov 1981 A
4306998 Wenzel et al. Dec 1981 A
4309469 Varona Jan 1982 A
4325861 Braun et al. Apr 1982 A
4332319 Hurwood Jun 1982 A
4333464 Nakano Jun 1982 A
4343133 Daniels et al. Aug 1982 A
4343134 Davidowich et al. Aug 1982 A
4343403 Daniels et al. Aug 1982 A
4344804 Bijen et al. Aug 1982 A
4362781 Anderson Dec 1982 A
4372447 Miller Feb 1983 A
4375448 Appel et al. Mar 1983 A
4377544 Rasmussen Mar 1983 A
4377645 Guthrie et al. Mar 1983 A
4385019 Bernstein et al. May 1983 A
4419403 Varona Dec 1983 A
4425126 Butterworth et al. Jan 1984 A
4440105 Jeltema Apr 1984 A
4491645 Thompson Jan 1985 A
4494278 Kroyer et al. Jan 1985 A
4496619 Okamoto Jan 1985 A
4511687 Nakanishi et al. Apr 1985 A
4512279 Damrau et al. Apr 1985 A
4528360 Fujita et al. Jul 1985 A
4537807 Chan et al. Aug 1985 A
4543128 Troesch et al. Sep 1985 A
4585835 Saegusa et al. Apr 1986 A
4588400 Ring et al. May 1986 A
4592850 Castner Jun 1986 A
4594389 Lal et al. Jun 1986 A
4600404 Sheldon et al. Jul 1986 A
4617235 Shinonome et al. Oct 1986 A
4627950 Matsui et al. Dec 1986 A
4638017 Larson et al. Jan 1987 A
4640810 Laursen et al. Feb 1987 A
4702947 Pall et al. Oct 1987 A
4711725 Amick et al. Dec 1987 A
4725489 Jones et al. Feb 1988 A
4732797 Johnson et al. Mar 1988 A
4737405 Bouchette Apr 1988 A
4738992 Larson et al. Apr 1988 A
4740398 Bouchette Apr 1988 A
4744830 Kobayashi et al. May 1988 A
4753844 Jones et al. Jun 1988 A
4755421 Manning et al. Jul 1988 A
4757891 Krumpe et al. Jul 1988 A
4772492 Bouchette Sep 1988 A
4772501 Johnson et al. Sep 1988 A
4781974 Bouchette et al. Nov 1988 A
4792326 Tews Dec 1988 A
4795668 Krueger et al. Jan 1989 A
4814131 Atlas Mar 1989 A
4837078 Harrington Jun 1989 A
4855132 Heller et al. Aug 1989 A
4894118 Edwards et al. Jan 1990 A
4902559 Eschwey et al. Feb 1990 A
4930942 Keyes et al. Jun 1990 A
4941989 Kramer et al. Jul 1990 A
4966808 Kawano Oct 1990 A
4998984 McClendon Mar 1991 A
5009652 Morgan et al. Apr 1991 A
5026363 Pratt Jun 1991 A
5033172 Harrington Jul 1991 A
5045387 Schmalz Sep 1991 A
5049440 Bornhoeft, III et al. Sep 1991 A
5053482 Tietz Oct 1991 A
5057361 Sayovitz et al. Oct 1991 A
5084136 Haines et al. Jan 1992 A
5096640 Brody et al. Mar 1992 A
5097004 Gallagher et al. Mar 1992 A
5097005 Tietz Mar 1992 A
5102601 Farris et al. Apr 1992 A
5104367 Hill Apr 1992 A
5104923 Steinwand et al. Apr 1992 A
5120598 Robeson et al. Jun 1992 A
5145727 Potts et al. Sep 1992 A
5149335 Kellenberger et al. Sep 1992 A
5149576 Potts et al. Sep 1992 A
5171308 Gallagher et al. Dec 1992 A
5171309 Gallagher et al. Dec 1992 A
5171402 Haines et al. Dec 1992 A
5173526 Vijayendran et al. Dec 1992 A
5178646 Barber, Jr. et al. Jan 1993 A
5178812 Sanford et al. Jan 1993 A
5181966 Honeycutt et al. Jan 1993 A
5181967 Honeycutt Jan 1993 A
5182162 Andrusko Jan 1993 A
5194517 Blubaugh et al. Mar 1993 A
5196470 Anderson et al. Mar 1993 A
5204104 Bolinger et al. Apr 1993 A
5205968 Damrow et al. Apr 1993 A
5206064 Scholz Apr 1993 A
5207662 James May 1993 A
5207837 Honeycutt May 1993 A
5208098 Stover May 1993 A
5216050 Sinclair Jun 1993 A
5217495 Kaplan et al. Jun 1993 A
5217798 Brady et al. Jun 1993 A
5218492 Miyamoto et al. Jun 1993 A
5219646 Gallagher et al. Jun 1993 A
5227101 Mahoney et al. Jul 1993 A
5246647 Beck et al. Sep 1993 A
5248461 Pluyter et al. Sep 1993 A
5252332 Goldstein Oct 1993 A
5256417 Koltisko Oct 1993 A
5257982 Cohen et al. Nov 1993 A
5264269 Kakiuchi et al. Nov 1993 A
5264491 Quirk Nov 1993 A
5270358 Asmus Dec 1993 A
5275699 Allan et al. Jan 1994 A
5281306 Kakiuchi et al. Jan 1994 A
5286538 Pearlstein et al. Feb 1994 A
5292581 Viazmensky et al. Mar 1994 A
5295985 Romesser et al. Mar 1994 A
5300192 Hansen et al. Apr 1994 A
5304420 Hirakawa et al. Apr 1994 A
5312883 Komatsu et al. May 1994 A
5317063 Komatsu et al. May 1994 A
5330827 Hansen Jul 1994 A
5330832 Liu Jul 1994 A
5334176 Buenger et al. Aug 1994 A
5346541 Goldman et al. Sep 1994 A
5350624 Georger et al. Sep 1994 A
5356963 Kauffman et al. Oct 1994 A
5360826 Egolf et al. Nov 1994 A
5362565 Murano et al. Nov 1994 A
5366804 Dugan Nov 1994 A
5369155 Asmus Nov 1994 A
5384189 Kuroda et al. Jan 1995 A
5393602 Urry Feb 1995 A
5400982 Collins Mar 1995 A
5405342 Roessler et al. Apr 1995 A
5407442 Karapasha Apr 1995 A
5409747 Pearlstein et al. Apr 1995 A
5415643 Kolb May 1995 A
5415813 Misselyn et al. May 1995 A
5427899 Avison et al. Jun 1995 A
5437908 Demura et al. Aug 1995 A
5439521 Rao Aug 1995 A
5442016 Jarrett et al. Aug 1995 A
5443084 Saleur Aug 1995 A
5449127 Davis Sep 1995 A
5449551 Taniguchi Sep 1995 A
5456420 Frazier Oct 1995 A
5458591 Roessler et al. Oct 1995 A
5464170 Mitchell et al. Nov 1995 A
5466410 Hills Nov 1995 A
5466518 Isaac et al. Nov 1995 A
5470640 Modrak Nov 1995 A
5470941 Kim et al. Nov 1995 A
5473789 Oster Dec 1995 A
5476457 Roessler et al. Dec 1995 A
5476909 Kim et al. Dec 1995 A
5480060 Blythe Jan 1996 A
5486307 Misselyn et al. Jan 1996 A
5494250 Chen Feb 1996 A
5495997 Moody Mar 1996 A
5500068 Srinivasan et al. Mar 1996 A
5500281 Srinivasan et al. Mar 1996 A
5509913 Yeo Apr 1996 A
5514380 Song et al. May 1996 A
5516432 King et al. May 1996 A
5519085 Ma et al. May 1996 A
5522841 Roby et al. Jun 1996 A
5527171 Soerensen Jun 1996 A
5530074 Jarrett et al. Jun 1996 A
5532300 Koubek et al. Jul 1996 A
5532306 Kauffman et al. Jul 1996 A
5534178 Bailly et al. Jul 1996 A
5534229 Nomura et al. Jul 1996 A
5542566 Glaug et al. Aug 1996 A
5545472 Koubek et al. Aug 1996 A
5569230 Fisher et al. Oct 1996 A
5576364 Isaac et al. Nov 1996 A
5578344 Ahr et al. Nov 1996 A
5589545 Ramachandran et al. Dec 1996 A
5604195 Misselyn et al. Feb 1997 A
5612404 Das et al. Mar 1997 A
5613959 Roessler et al. Mar 1997 A
5616201 Finch et al. Apr 1997 A
5618911 Kimura et al. Apr 1997 A
5620788 Garavaglia et al. Apr 1997 A
5629081 Richards et al. May 1997 A
5631317 Komatsu et al. May 1997 A
5647862 Osborn, III et al. Jul 1997 A
5647863 Hammons et al. Jul 1997 A
5648083 Blieszner et al. Jul 1997 A
5649336 Finch et al. Jul 1997 A
5667635 Win et al. Sep 1997 A
5670110 Dirk et al. Sep 1997 A
5684075 Patel et al. Nov 1997 A
5693698 Patel et al. Dec 1997 A
5695551 Buckingham et al. Dec 1997 A
5698322 Tsai et al. Dec 1997 A
5714157 Sandell et al. Feb 1998 A
5725789 Huber et al. Mar 1998 A
5725821 Gannon et al. Mar 1998 A
5753246 Peters May 1998 A
5756112 Mackey May 1998 A
5756625 Crandall et al. May 1998 A
5763044 Ahr et al. Jun 1998 A
5763332 Gordon et al. Jun 1998 A
5765717 Gottselig Jun 1998 A
5766758 Hirakawa et al. Jun 1998 A
5770528 Mumick et al. Jun 1998 A
5786065 Annis et al. Jul 1998 A
5795921 Dyer et al. Aug 1998 A
5800417 Goerg-Wood et al. Sep 1998 A
5804203 Hahn et al. Sep 1998 A
5807364 Hansen Sep 1998 A
5837627 Halabisky et al. Nov 1998 A
5846230 Osborn, III et al. Dec 1998 A
5849805 Dyer Dec 1998 A
5858342 Giret et al. Jan 1999 A
5866675 Ahmed et al. Feb 1999 A
5869596 Ahmed et al. Feb 1999 A
5871763 Luu et al. Feb 1999 A
5899893 Dyer et al. May 1999 A
5905046 Takeda et al. May 1999 A
5916678 Jackson et al. Jun 1999 A
5935384 Taniguchi Aug 1999 A
5935880 Wang et al. Aug 1999 A
5948710 Pomplun et al. Sep 1999 A
5952077 Booth et al. Sep 1999 A
5952251 Jackson et al. Sep 1999 A
5958187 Bhat et al. Sep 1999 A
5958555 Takeuchi et al. Sep 1999 A
5968286 Crudele et al. Oct 1999 A
5969052 Mumick et al. Oct 1999 A
5971138 Soughan Oct 1999 A
5972805 Pomplun et al. Oct 1999 A
5976694 Tsai et al. Nov 1999 A
5980673 Takeuchi et al. Nov 1999 A
5986004 Pomplun et al. Nov 1999 A
6005045 Klanica Dec 1999 A
6007585 Syed et al. Dec 1999 A
6010972 Zacharias et al. Jan 2000 A
6017832 Yahiaoui et al. Jan 2000 A
6028016 Yahiaoui et al. Feb 2000 A
6031045 Wei et al. Feb 2000 A
6042769 Gannon et al. Mar 2000 A
6043317 Mumick et al. Mar 2000 A
6056235 Brozinsky May 2000 A
6059882 Steinhardt et al. May 2000 A
6059928 Van Luu et al. May 2000 A
6083854 Bogdanski et al. Jul 2000 A
6093410 Peffly et al. Jul 2000 A
6098836 Gottselig Aug 2000 A
6103858 Yamamoto et al. Aug 2000 A
6121170 Tsai et al. Sep 2000 A
6123811 Komarnycky et al. Sep 2000 A
6127593 Bjorkquist et al. Oct 2000 A
6132557 Takeuchi et al. Oct 2000 A
6171292 Osborn, III et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187141 Takeuchi et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190502 Takeuchi et al. Feb 2001 B1
6238683 Burnett et al. May 2001 B1
6277768 Mumick et al. Aug 2001 B1
6292186 Lehman et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294645 Allen et al. Sep 2001 B1
RE53753 Engekhart Dec 2001
6423804 Chang et al. Jul 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (121)
Number Date Country
748453 Apr 1970 BE
631395 Nov 1961 CA
2057692 Oct 1992 CA
1719395 Dec 1970 DE
251325 Sep 1976 DE
0 027 997 May 1981 EP
0 103 902 Mar 1984 EP
0 206 489 Dec 1986 EP
0 303 528 Feb 1989 EP
0 315 466 May 1989 EP
0 355 254 Feb 1990 EP
0 408 199 Jan 1991 EP
0 525 671 Mar 1993 EP
0 358 313 Aug 1993 EP
0 241 127 Oct 1993 EP
0 372 388 Feb 1994 EP
0 582 123 Feb 1994 EP
0 601 518 Jun 1994 EP
0 608 460 Aug 1994 EP
0 613 675 Sep 1994 EP
0 619 074 Oct 1994 EP
0 620 256 Oct 1994 EP
0 421 163 Nov 1994 EP
0 572 569 Dec 1994 EP
0 634 466 Jan 1995 EP
0 639 381 Feb 1995 EP
0 507 878 Apr 1995 EP
0 648 871 Apr 1995 EP
0 654 492 May 1995 EP
0 445 655 Jun 1995 EP
0 411 752 Jul 1995 EP
0 552 762 Aug 1995 EP
0 672 787 Sep 1995 EP
0 689 817 Jan 1996 EP
0 597 978 Mar 1996 EP
0 726 068 Aug 1996 EP
0 580 764 Jan 1997 EP
0 765 649 Apr 1997 EP
0 768 425 Apr 1997 EP
0 225 800 May 1997 EP
0 443 627 Jun 1997 EP
0 510 572 Jun 1997 EP
0 779 387 Jun 1997 EP
0 781 538 Jul 1997 EP
0 801 157 Oct 1997 EP
0 801 172 Oct 1997 EP
0 802 282 Oct 1997 EP
0 802 804 Oct 1997 EP
0 807 704 Nov 1997 EP
0 598 204 Dec 1997 EP
0 896 089 Feb 1998 EP
0 531 112 Mar 1998 EP
0 829 503 Mar 1998 EP
0 549 988 Jun 1998 EP
0 637 950 Jul 1998 EP
0 766 756 Sep 1998 EP
0 864 418 Sep 1998 EP
0 873 100 Oct 1998 EP
0 875 233 Nov 1998 EP
0 792 144 Dec 1998 EP
0 706 361 Mar 1999 EP
0 761 795 Mar 1999 EP
0 904 933 Mar 1999 EP
0 905 313 Mar 1999 EP
0 671 496 Apr 1999 EP
0 580 811 Aug 1999 EP
0 937 453 Aug 1999 EP
0 693 915 Sep 1999 EP
0 699 727 Sep 1999 EP
0 945 536 Sep 1999 EP
0 766 755 Dec 1999 EP
0 793 743 Mar 2000 EP
0 773 315 May 2000 EP
1 024 225 Aug 2000 EP
1 050 297 Aug 2000 EP
1 039 024 Sep 2000 EP
1 046 747 Oct 2000 EP
1 065 302 Jan 2001 EP
2672788 Aug 1992 FR
1 452 325 Oct 1976 GB
4943114 Nov 1974 JP
5125123 May 1993 JP
6172453 Jun 1994 JP
06220793 Aug 1994 JP
62 33809 Aug 1994 JP
8239428 Sep 1996 JP
705013 Dec 1979 SU
WO 9003156 Apr 1990 WO
WO 9114413 Oct 1991 WO
WO 9307199 Apr 1993 WO
WO 9425189 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9518191 Jul 1995 WO
WO 9612615 May 1996 WO
WO 9621475 Jul 1996 WO
WO 9630576 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9702375 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9702376 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9710100 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9716597 May 1997 WO
WO 9718784 May 1997 WO
WO 9747227 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9826808 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9829461 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9829501 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9836117 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9841577 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9844141 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9844181 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9848684 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9853006 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9857608 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9901106 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9906523 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9907273 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9925318 May 1999 WO
WO 0000026 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0038751 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0039373 Jul 2000 WO
WO 00397851 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0059427 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0113880 Mar 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (27)
Entry
Patent Abstract of Japan, JP 06-207324 (Unitka Ltd.), Jul. 26, 1994.
Robeson, L.M., et al., “Microfiber Formation: Immiscible Polymer Blends Involving Thermoplastic Poly(vinyl Alcohol) as an Extractable Matrix”, J. Applied Polymer Science, vol. 52, pp. 1837-1846 (1994).
D 5034-11, “Standard Test Method for Breaking Force and Elongation of Textile Fabrics (Grab Test),” 1994 Ann. Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 7.02, pp 708-709 (1994).
Abstract Derwent WPI, JP 5-179548 (Lion Corp), Jul. 20, 1993).
Abstract Derwent WPI and JAPIO, JP 03-239709 (Lion Corp) Oct. 25, 1991.
Carlsson et al., “Thermal Gelation of Nonionic Cellulose Ethers and Ionic Surfactants in Water”, Colloids and Surfaces, vol. 47, pp. 147-165 (1990).
Abstract Derwent WPI, J: 1-306661 (Lion Corp) Dec. 11, 1989.
Chowdhury et al., “Direct Observation of the Gelatin of Rodlike Polymers”, Poly. Mat. Sci. and Eng., vol. 59, pp. 1045-1052 (9/88).
Abstract Derwent WPI and JAPIO, JP 63/139906 (Lion Corp) Jun. 11, 1988.
Nagura et al., “Temperature-Viscosity Relationships of Aqueous Solutions of Cellulose Ethers”, Kobunshi Ronbunshu, vol. 38 (3), pp. 133-137 (8/80).
Stafford et al., “Temperature Dependence of the Disintegration times of compressed tablets containing hydroxypropylcellulose as binder”, J. Pharm. Pharmac., vol. 30, pp. 1-5 (8/77).
Govindan, T.S., “Process for Making Smooth Vapro-Permeable Microporous Sheet Material”, Defensive Publication, vol. T901 (007), (8/72).
The Encyclopedia of Chemistry, 3rd Ed. p. 14, 1974.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 01207457 (Uni-Charm Corp.), Aug. 21, 1989.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 020822925 (Kinpou Seish KK), Mar. 23, 1990.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 02221489 (Kanetoyo Seishi KK), Sep. 4, 1990.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 03167400 (Nichirin Kagaku Kogyo KK), Jul. 19, 1991.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 0321596 (S T Chem Co. Ltd Japan Vilene Co. Ltd), Sep. 18, 1991.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 05003248 (Seiko Instr. Inc.), Jan. 8, 1993.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 06192527 (Nichiyu Giken Kogyo KK), Jul. 12, 1994.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 06207162 (S T Chem Co. Ltd.), Jul. 26, 1994.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 09131388 (Kaminaga Taira), May 20, 1997.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 09132896 (Uni Charm Corp.), May 20, 1997.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 09132897 (Uni Charm Corp.), May 20, 1997.
Patent Abstract of Japan No. 10277088 (Kao Corp.), Oct. 20, 1998.
Abstract Derwent WPI, JP 62141199 (Agency of Ind Sci & Technology), Jun. 24, 1987.
Abstract Derwent WPI, JP 63 294851 (Takasago Perfumery Co), Dec. 1, 1988.