Patent Application
20170117113
Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to an indirectly heated cathode (IHC) ion source, and more particularly, an IHC ion source with variable electrode voltages to improve the life of the IHC ion source.
Indirectly heated cathode (IHC) ion sources operate by supplying a current to a filament disposed behind a cathode. The filament emits thermionic electrons, which are accelerated toward and heat the cathode, in turn causing the cathode to emit electrons into the chamber of the ion source. The cathode is disposed at one end of a chamber. A repeller is typically disposed on the end of the chamber opposite the cathode. The repeller may be biased so as to repel the electrons, directing them back toward the center of the chamber. In some embodiments, a magnetic field is used to further confine the electrons within the chamber.
In certain embodiments, electrodes are also disposed on one or more sides of the chamber. These electrodes may be positively or negatively biased so as to control the position of ions and electrons, so as to increase the ion density near the center of the chamber. An extraction aperture is disposed along another side, proximate the center of the chamber, through which the ions may be extracted.
One issue associated with IHC ion sources is that the cathode may have a limited lifetime. The cathode is subjected to bombardment from electrons on its back surface, and by positively charged ions on its front surface. This bombardment results in sputtering, which causes erosion of the cathode. In many embodiments, the life of the IHC ion source is dictated by the life of the cathode.
Therefore, an IHC ion source that can increase the life of the cathode may be beneficial. Further, it would be advantageous if this apparatus maintained the desired beam current throughout the life of the IHC ion source.
An IHC ion source having improved life is disclosed. The IHC ion source comprises a chamber having a cathode and a repeller on opposite ends of the ion source. Biased electrodes are disposed on one or more sides of the ion source. The bias voltage applied to at least one of the cathode, the repeller and the electrodes, relative to the chamber, is varied over time. In certain embodiments, the voltage applied to the electrodes may begin at an initial positive voltage. Over time, this voltage may be reduced, while still maintaining the target ion beam current. Advantageously, the life of the cathode is improved using this technique.
According to one embodiment, an indirectly heated cathode ion source is disclosed. The indirectly heated cathode ion source comprises a chamber into which a gas is introduced; a cathode disposed on one end of the chamber; a repeller disposed at an opposite end of the chamber; and at least one electrode disposed along a side of the chamber; wherein a voltage applied to at least one of the cathode, the repeller and the at least one electrode relative to the chamber varies over time. In certain embodiments, the voltage decreases over time. In certain embodiments, the ion source comprises a controller. In certain embodiments, the controller monitors hours of operation of the indirectly heated cathode ion source and determines the voltage to be applied based on hours of operation of the indirectly heated cathode ion source. In certain embodiments, the controller is in communication with a current measurement system, wherein the measurement system measures current of an ion beam extracted from the indirectly heated cathode ion source through an extraction aperture, and the controller adjusts the voltage to be applied based on measured current of the ion beam. In certain embodiments, at least one of the cathode, the repeller and the at least one electrode is initially formed with a front surface having a concave surface.
According to another embodiment, an indirectly heated cathode ion source is disclosed. The indirectly heated cathode ion source comprises a chamber into which a gas is introduced; a cathode disposed on one end of the chamber; a repeller disposed at an opposite end of the chamber; and at least one electrode disposed along a side of the chamber; wherein a voltage applied to the at least one electrode decreases over time. In certain embodiments, the ion source further comprises a second electrode on a side opposite the at least one electrode, where the second electrode is electrically connected to the chamber. In certain embodiments, the cathode and the repeller are negatively biased relative to the chamber and the at least one electrode is initially positively biased relative to the chamber. In certain embodiments, the indirectly heated cathode ion source comprises a controller, and the controller decreases the voltage by a first rate during a burn-in phase and decreases the voltage by a second rate during an operational phase, wherein the first rate is greater than the second rate
According to another embodiment, an indirectly heated cathode ion source is disclosed. The indirectly heated cathode ion source comprises a chamber; a cathode disposed on one end of the chamber, in communication with a cathode power supply; a repeller disposed on an opposite end of the chamber, in communication with a repeller power supply; an electrode disposed within the chamber and on a side of the chamber, in communication with an electrode power supply; an extraction aperture disposed on another side of the chamber; and a controller, in communication with at least one of the cathode power supply, the repeller power supply and the electrode power supply, wherein the controller modifies a voltage applied to one of the cathode, the repeller and the electrode relative to the chamber over time. In certain embodiments, the cathode power supply and the repeller power supply are one power supply.
For a better understanding of the present disclosure, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein by reference and in which:
As described above, indirectly heated cathode ion sources may be susceptible to shortened life due to the effect of sputtering, especially on the cathode and the repeller. Typically, over time, one or both of these components fail, often when a hole develops through the component.
Thus, the filament power supply 165 supplies a current to the filament 160. The cathode bias power supply 116 biases the filament 160 so that it is more negative than the cathode 110, so that electrons are attracted toward the cathode 110 from the filament 160. Finally, the cathode power supply 115 biases the cathode 110 more negatively than the chamber 100.
A repeller 120 is disposed in the chamber 100 on the end of the chamber 100 opposite the cathode 110. The repeller 120 may be in communication with repeller power supply 125. As the name suggests, the repeller 120 serves to repel the electrons emitted from the cathode 110 back toward the center of the chamber 100. For example, the repeller 120 may be biased at a negative voltage relative to the chamber 100 to repel the electrons. Like the cathode power supply 115, the repeller power supply 125 may negatively bias the repeller 120 relative to the chamber 100.
For example, the repeller power supply 125 may have an output in the range of 0 to −150V, although other voltages may be used. In certain embodiments, the repeller 120 is biased at between 0 and −40V relative to the chamber 100.
In certain embodiments, the cathode 110 and the repeller 120 may be connected to a common power supply. Thus, in this embodiment, the cathode power supply 115 and repeller power supply 125 are the same power supply.
Although not shown, in certain embodiments, a magnetic field is generated in the chamber 100. This magnetic field is intended to confine the electrons along one direction. For example, electrons may be confined in a column that is parallel to the direction from the cathode 110 to the repeller 120 (i.e. the y direction).
Electrodes 130a, 130b may be disposed on sides of the chamber 100, such that the electrodes 130a, 130b are within the chamber 100. The electrodes 130a, 130b may be biased by a power supply. In certain embodiments, the electrodes 130a, 130b may be in communication with a common power supply. However, in other embodiments, to allow maximum flexibility and ability to tune the output of the IHC ion source 10, the electrodes 130a, 130b may each be in communication with a respective electrode power supply 135a, 135b.
Like cathode power supply 115 and repeller power supply 125, the electrode power supplies 135a, 135b serve to bias the electrodes relative to the chamber 100. In certain embodiments, the electrode power supplies 135a, 135b may bias the electrodes 130a, 130b positively or negatively relative the chamber 100.
For example, the electrode power supplies 135a, 135b may initially bias at least one of the electrodes 130a, 130b at a voltage of between 0 and 150 volts relative to the chamber. In certain embodiments, at least one of the electrodes 130a, 130b may be initially biased at between 60 and 150 volts relative to the chamber. In other embodiments, one or both of the electrodes 130a, 130b may be electrically connected to the chamber 100, and therefore is at the same voltage as the chamber 100.
Each of the cathode 110, the repeller 120 and the electrodes 130a, 130b are made of an electrically conductive material, such as a metal.
Disposed on another side of the chamber 100 may be an extraction aperture 140. In
A controller 180 may be in communication with one or more of the power supplies such that the voltage or current supplied by these power supplies may be modified. Further, in certain embodiments, the controller 180 may be in communication with a measurement system 200 (see
During operation, the filament power supply 165 passes a current through the filament 160, which causes the filament to emit thermionic electrons. These electrons strike the back surface of the cathode 110, which may be more positive than the filament 160, causing the cathode 110 to heat, which in turn causes the cathode 110 to emit electrons into the chamber 100. These electrons collide with the molecules of gas that are fed into the chamber 100 through the gas inlet. These collisions create ions, which form a plasma 150. The plasma 150 may be confined and manipulated by the electrical fields created by the cathode 110, the repeller 120, and the electrodes 130a, 130b. In certain embodiments, the plasma 150 is confined near the center of the chamber 100, proximate the extraction aperture 140.
Over time, the cathode 110, the repeller 120 and the electrodes 130a, 130b may be worn down due to the sputtering of the ions and electrons on these components. For example,
In some cases, the current supplied to the filament 160 may be increased by the controller 180 to compensate for this decrease in plasma density. This causes the cathode 110 to heat to a higher temperature, emitting more electrons. In some cases, the potential difference between the filament 160 and the cathode 110 is changed, by varying the output of cathode bias power supply 116, changing the energy at which the electrons from the filament 160 strike the cathode 110. In certain cases, both of these techniques are used. However, these techniques, while successful in restoring the desired extracted ion beam current, may have deleterious effects on the life of the ion source.
Rather than modifying the current in the filament 160, or modifying the bias voltage between filament 160 and cathode 110, the present system adjusts the voltages applied to at least one of the cathode 110, the repeller 120 and the electrodes 130a, 130b relative to the chamber over time.
The controller 180 may modify these voltages in one of two ways. First, the controller 180 may modify the voltages based on hours of operation. For example, the controller 180 may include a table, formula, equation or other technique which associates a voltage with the current hours of operation. Further, the controller 180 may include a clock function allowing the controller 180 to track the amount of time that the IHC ion source 10 has been utilized. In other words, if the IHC ion source 10 has been in operation for 50 hours, the controller 180 may refer to a table or perform a calculation to determine the appropriate voltage to apply to the cathode 110, the repeller 120 and the electrodes 130a, 130b, based on this value. The controller 180 may change the voltage continuously, or may change the voltage in discrete steps. For example, the controller 180 may change the voltage after every N hours of operation.
In another embodiment, the controller 180 may utilize closed loop feedback, as shown in
In one specific embodiment, the controller 180 may monitor hours of operation and adjust the voltage applied to electrode 130a, using electrode power supply 135a. In certain embodiments, the voltage applied to the electrode 130a may decrease over time. For example, the voltage may be a first value when the ion source is initialized. This first value may be positive relative to the chamber 100, such as, for example, between 60 and 150V. This voltage may decrease over time. In one embodiment, there is a relationship between the voltage applied to electrode 130a and the hours of operation of the IHC ion source 10. This relationship may be linear, or may be any suitable function. For example, the voltage applied to electrode 130a may be changed after every 10 hours of operation.
In a further embodiment, the controller 180 may further classify the operation of the ion source as either the burn-in phase or the operational phase. The burn-in phase may be considered, for example, the first 50 hours of operation, although other durations may also be used. The operational phase may be the hours of operation after the burn-in phase. The controller 180 may use one linear relationship between voltage and hours of operation during the burn-in phase and a second linear relationship between voltage and hours of operation during the operating phase.
In another embodiment, the controller 180 may monitor the actual extracted ion beam current and adjust the voltage applied to electrode 130a, using electrode power supply 135a. In certain embodiments, the voltage applied to the electrode 130a may decrease over time. For example, the voltage may be a first value when the ion source is initialized. This first value may be positive relative to the chamber 100, such as, for example, between 60 and 150V. To maintain a constant extracted ion beam current, the voltage may decrease over time.
In a particular embodiment, the voltage applied to the electrode 130a may be initially set to 80V. Over time, that voltage may decrease in order to maintain the target extracted ion beam current. In some embodiments, this decrease may be linear as a function of hours of operation. For example, the voltage of the electrode 130a may be defined as V−m*H, where V is the initial voltage applied to the electrode 130a, H is the number of hours of operation for the ion source and m is the rate at which the voltage is to be decreased with respect to hours of operation. In other embodiments, this decrease is determined by monitoring the extracted ions beam current and varying the voltage applied to electrode 130a to maintain the target extracted ion beam current. In this embodiment, the decrease in the voltage applied to the electrode 130a may or may not be linear over time.
In certain embodiments, the initial shape of the cathode 110, repeller 120 and the electrodes 130a, 130b may be changed to improve the life of the IHC ion source 10. For example, typically, the front surfaces of these components are flat. However, in certain embodiments, these components may be initially formed with a front surface having a concave shape. While
The embodiments described above in the present application may have many advantages. As described above, IHC ion sources are susceptible to short life due to the sputtering effect on the cathode and the repeller. Unlike other IHC ion sources, the present system modifies the voltage applied to the cathode, repeller and/or electrodes over time to maintain a desired ion beam current. However, as the voltages applied to these components decreases, less sputtering occurs due to the reduced electrical potentials, increasing the life of the IHC ion source. In one test, the life of an IHC ion source was increased by over 40% using this technique.
In other words, prior art techniques seek to vary the temperature of cathode 110, which achieves the purpose of controlling the extracted ion beam current. However, none of these prior art techniques seeks to control the sputter rate of cathode 110, because the sputter rate primarily depends on the differential voltage between cathode 110, the repeller 120 and the other electrodes 130a, 130b. The present system maintains ion beam current, while simultaneously extending the life of the IHC ion source.
The present disclosure is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments described herein. Indeed, other various embodiments of and modifications to the present disclosure, in addition to those described herein, will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from the foregoing description and accompanying drawings. Thus, such other embodiments and modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the present disclosure. Furthermore, although the present disclosure has been described herein in the context of a particular implementation in a particular environment for a particular purpose, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that its usefulness is not limited thereto and that the present disclosure may be beneficially implemented in any number of environments for any number of purposes. Accordingly, the claims set forth below should be construed in view of the full breadth and spirit of the present disclosure as described herein.
This application claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 62/245,567, filed Oct. 23, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62245567 | Oct 2015 | US |
