IONICALLY AND THERMALLY ENHANCED SOLID STATE GENERATOR

Abstract
A solid state energy conversion device along with its production methods and systems of use is provided. The device in its most basic form consists of two layers, in contact with each other, of dissimilar materials in terms of electron density and configuration, sandwiched between metal layers, which serve as the anode and cathode of the device. One example, of the inside layers, is when a carbon and an ionic material layer (carbon matrix) is contacted with, the other inner material, consisting of an oxide mixed with an ionic material (oxide matrix). This device takes advantage of the built-in potential that forms across the barrier between the carbon matrix and the oxide matrix. The built-in potential of the device (when not attached to a resistive load at the terminals), which is determined mathematically by integrating the electrostatic forces that have created themselves across the barrier, will rise or fall in direct proportion to the rise and fall of the device temperature (in kelvins). When a load is attached across the terminals of the device, current flows. Depending on the size of the load or the surface area of the device, a reduced current will allow sustained recombination such that the built-in potential and current remains steady overtime. Otherwise, the current curve will fall over time similar to a capacitor device. Experimentation shows that current rises by the fourth power of the temperature factor.
Description
FIELD OF THE TECHNOLOGY

This technology relates to the generation of electric energy by a solid-state device and more particularly, by the use as a voltage source of thermally enhanced, built-in potentials arising at the junction between dissimilar materials including metals, semiconductors, ceramics (oxides, carbides, etc.) and carbons (graphite, charcoal).


BACKGROUND OF THE TECHNOLOGY

Electrical power generation devices use power inputs including, but not limited to electromagnetic waves (sunlight, infrared light, etc.), thermal energy, mechanical energy and nuclear energy and then convert these different forms of energy inputs into useable electrical power. The manufacture of these devices, although well established, can still be expensive and complicated.


Most power generation today occurs from the irreversible combustion of fossil fuels and although this form of energy conversion is still less expensive than other types of electricity generation, the long term damage to the environment and human health is not currently born by the cost of energy production. In addition, the conversion of petroleum to electrical energy is estimated to be only 9% efficient.


The cost of electricity produced from solar cells is still quite expensive when compared to fossil fuel based electrical power generation, and there remains the problem of energy storage in the absence of relevant light frequencies (night time). In addition, because of the photoelectric effect, solar cells can take advantage of only certain frequencies of sunlight, rendering their efficiency at around 11-30% of incident energy from the sun.


Other types of energy conversion systems based on wind, hydroelectric, and nuclear energy input, while cost effective in some cases, still negatively impact the environment and/or may require large capital outlays. Other more exotic types of electrical generation devices such as thermoelectric, thermionic and magneto-hydrodynamic ones do not currently have the conversion efficiencies necessary to make them adaptable to mass electrical power production and in addition, are complicated to manufacture. Even with the current price of oil as of Oct. 2, 2006 hovering at $61/barrel, alternative forms of energy conversion are still not cost effective to produce and operate. Those forms of energy input (for example, coal and nuclear) that are considered cost competitive with petroleum-based energy inputs create damage to the environment through the emission of greenhouse gases and particulates or through the production of radioactive waste.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE TECHNOLOGY

The present technology, a new type of electrical power generation device, is based on layering of stabilized materials-oxides, semiconductors, metals and carbons-such that voltage differentials are manifested at the interface of the materials and an overall voltage value is exhibited between the anode and cathode outer layers of the device. The production of electricity from this device or cell is possible by exploiting built-in potential created across the interface between stable materials with dissimilar electron/hole configurations and densities.


Accordingly, several objects and advantages of the technology are: (a) to provide a method of electrical power generation which can be produced by a variety of materials that are readily available in most parts of the world; (b) to provide a method of electrical power generation that is easily manufactured with age-old, continuous or batch, printing and painting techniques and without the need for expensive machining or manufacturing processes; (c) to provide a method of electrical power generation that does not involve the emission of particulates, radioactive waste, greenhouse gases or other harmful pollutants; (d) to provide a method of electrical power generation that operates both at very low temperatures (below room temperature) and at very high temperatures (above 3000 K) as well as, those in between; (e) to provide a method of electrical power generation that does not necessarily require a constant feed of input power for conversion purposes; (f) to provide a method of electrical power generation that merely requires the presence of heat in order to take advantage of the existing built-in potential, from the electrostatic force available between certain materials at their interfaces when they are joined; (g) to provide a method of electrical power generation that can have very flat dimensions, so as to be incorporated unobtrusively into existing areas such as walls, car hoods, airplane fuselages, roads, etc.; (h) to provide a method of electrical power generation that can be used in transportation vehicles, including but not limited to airplanes, bikes, cars, ships and trucks; (i) to provide a method of electrical power generation where the power generation devices can be employed in familiar configurations already used by batteries, generators and capacitors to take advantage of already existing infrastructure.


Further objects and advantages are to provide a method of electrical power generation that can vary in size and scale to accommodate the power needs of smaller devices, such as radios, as well as larger entities, such as homes, towns and cities. Still further objects and advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the ensuing description and drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A is a two dimensional view of the most basic device cell as seen from the side of the cathode or anode;



FIG. 1B is the theoretical electric circuit equivalent of the cell;



FIG. 1C is a perspective view of the most basic device cell, constructed in accordance with one example of the technology;



FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing how ambient cell temperatures are managed in an encapsulated or insulated scenario;



FIG. 3 is a graph showing the current flow of two actual cells after different heat treatments;



FIG. 4 is a graph showing the voltage of two actual cells after different heat treatments;



FIG. 5 shows the best fit voltage-current line against the sample points from the steel, praseodymium oxide, carbon/graphite and zinc-plated steel cell with different resistive loads attached;



FIG. 6 is a lateral cross-sectional schematic view of a power cell device contained in an insulative type container such as a Dewar's flask or a ceramic container, with controller circuit, as well as thermocouple and heating element;



FIG. 7A is an illustrative schematic of charge behaviors prior to joining the carbon and oxide layers of the device;



FIG. 7b is a schematic representation of charge behaviors immediately after joining the carbon and oxide layers of the device;



FIG. 7c is a schematic representation of charge behavior at thermal equilibrium after joining the carbon and oxide layers of the device;



FIG. 7d is a schematic representation of charge behavior throughout cell, when a resistive load is attached across the joined carbon and oxide layers of the device; and



FIG. 8 is an oxide carbon cell encased/heat sealed in glass or plastic sheets with a black body absorber and heat storage panel.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EXAMPLES

The present technology, a new type of electrical power generation device, is based on the purposeful layering of different materials, oxides, semiconductors, metals and carbons, such that voltage differentials are manifested at the interface of the materials and an overall voltage value is exhibited between the anode and cathode of the device. The production of electricity from this device is caused by the creation of a built-in potential across the interface between stable materials with dissimilar electron configurations and densities. Once the correct series of layers are applied, the device may then be treated as any electrical power device and stacked in series or parallel, in order to reach a desired voltage or current output.


Electrons oscillate and emit electromagnetic energy in the form of waves. These waves possess a frequency distribution based on Planck's formula. Also, due to the connections between atoms, the displacement of one or more atoms from their equilibrium positions will give rise to a set of vibration waves propagating through the lattice. Since materials may contain both amorphous and crystalline components in their rigid states, the movement of electrons can result from, but not be restricted to photonic and photonic causes. In thermionic emission, electrons flow from the surface of a material and condense onto a dissimilar material, due to thermal vibrational energy overcoming the electrostatic forces which hold the electrons to the surface of the original material. The Seebeck effect instead deals with the manifestation of a voltage created in the presence of a temperature different metals or semiconductors. In photoelectric emission, electrons are emitted from matter when they absorb electromagnetic radiation that is above a threshold frequency.


When two dissimilar materials, with differing electron/hole densities, are brought into contact with each other, at the boundary between the two materials a built-in potential is formed. This occurs because of the diffusion of electrons and holes into regions with lower concentrations of electrons and holes. As recombination occurs, an electrical field eventually forms that opposes further recombination. The integration of this electric field over the depletion region between the two materials, determines the value of the built-in potential.


As free electrons gain kinetic energy due to the addition of heat from thermal or electromagnetic sources, more of them are able to migrate across the depletion zone and join with holes on the other side of the barrier region. The result is a widening depletion zone and an increased built-in voltage that is a linear function of junction temperature. If a load is connected across the two dissimilar materials, current flows. Ionic fluids present in the device's layers, facilitate further, the flow of electrons throughout the circuit.


When thermal equilibrium is reached, the built-in potential also reaches a constant and equilibrium value. At this point if a resistive load is applied across the terminals of the cell, the built-in potential acts as a charge pump, pushing current through the load. If the surface area of the cell is large enough or if resistive load is large enough, the current in the current will be small enough such that the rate of recombination across the depletion zone will be fast enough to allow the built-in potential and current to remain steady and indefinite. If however, the resistive load is too small or the surface area of the cell is too small, the rate of recombination, can not keep up with the power needs of the cell and the current will take on the shape found more in a capacitor device, ultimately deteriorating.


The combination of photonic, photonic and kinetically induced electron movement combined with the existence of a built-in potential across appropriately chosen materials results in a solid state electricity generator which demonstrates increasing voltage directly proportional to increasing temperature of the device and increasing current proportional to the fourth power of increasing temperature. Unlike in thermionic/thermoelectric devices, a temperature gradient is not necessary for the device to work and in fact the device produces electricity at room temperature, as long as the correct materials with certain determinate characteristics are chosen. Unlike photoelectric devices, which depend on electromagnetic radiation that is above the threshold frequency of the specific material used, the present technology uses the thermal energy that exists within its materials to create a built-in potential, which will result in an electron flow when a load is applied to the cell.


In one example of the solid-state generator herein described, carbon graphite (circa 90% by volume but variable), sodium chloride (ionic solid-circa 10% by volume but variable) and optionally, small amounts of binders such as an acrylic polymer emulsion, as well as evaporable fluids (water) are mixed to form a thin paste or ink. This paste is then applied to a metal surface or foil to a sufficient and uniform thickness (thicknesses of 0.2-1.0 millimeters were employed although, greater thicknesses may be required depending on higher operating temperatures and higher required built-in potentials at those temperatures) and allowed to dry and then optionally heated to a temperature sufficient to cause it to cure into a more stable solid material (drying temperatures used were not in excess of 150 degrees Celsius but may be higher depending on the operating temperatures and conditions of device).


Onto this dried layer of the first matrix is then applied the second paste of an oxide, sodium chloride, acrylic polymer emulsion binder (see above) and water matrix to a sufficient thickness ((again thicknesses of 0.2-1 millimeter were employed although, greater thicknesses may be required depending on operating conditions)). Before this second matrix layer is allowed to dry, a metal sheet or foil is applied onto this layer. This allows a much better adherence between the inner layers of the cell and the cathodes and/or anodes. This fundamental cell consisting of four layers: metal—carbon/graphite material-oxide-metal is allowed to dry and/or be heated to a high enough temperature that does not damage the cell, but cures to a more stable solid material (<150 Celsius).


Once dried the cell, depending on the expected operating minimum and maximum temperatures, may be allowed to absorb a fluid such as water, which will facilitate the conduction of charge carriers, by either combining with the electrolyte in the solid and dissolving it, or by actually being the primary electrolyte. The choice of ionic fluids is dependent on the operating temperature of the cell. Cells that will operate at a higher temperature than the evaporation point of the electrolyte, must be sealed and pressurized to ensure that the ionic fluids do not escape.


When the cell has absorbed a sufficient quantity of electrolytic fluid, it is then sealed, around the edges with the temperature appropriate, electrical and moisture insulating sealant to ensure the integrity of the cell. Sealants can include but not be limited to epoxy glues, heat treated plastics, electrical tape or other types of sealants as well as ceramic glazes that cure below the melting temperature of the electrolyte. The cell will exhibit a voltage, as long as it remains at an operating temperature, that allows the electrolyte fluid to function but does not result in any of the other non-electrolyte materials or metals in the cell, to reach their melting point. At this point, the immersion of the cell in different temperature baths will result in a proportional change in voltage. The cell does not need a temperature differential to work, but erogates based on the resistive load attached to it and the ambient temperature of the cell. The ideal resistive load allows the recombination of electrons and holes to occur at a rate that maintains a constant voltage and current.


Manufacturing and Materials Details


Since power output is directly proportional to the size of the surface area between the carbon and oxide layers, the metal substrate can be formed with many grooves, crinkles or ridges, and as the carbon, and then oxide layers, are applied, the grooving, crinkling or ridging continues through each applied layer, resulting in a higher surface area. The carbon paste or paint and the oxide paste or paint may be applied by the use of rollers, brushes, sprayers, screen printing techniques, inkjet printers or any other method that allows the dispersion of ink or paint onto a surface. Although the cells should work not only with amorphous materials but also more crystalline layers of carbon materials and oxides, the ability to simply apply the materials as a paste should greatly decrease manufacturing costs and the use of expensive crystal growing and manufacturing technologies.


One of the current drawbacks of current photoelectric and thermoelectric devices, is the need for clean rooms and highly sophisticated (i.e. expensive) techniques and processes for crystal growth and device manufacture. In the prototypes created, the metal foils or sheeting used were aluminum, stainless steel and zinc-coated stainless steel. The carbon layer consisted of graphite mixed with sodium chloride, water and an acrylic binder. The oxide layers used were from each of the following metals: praseodymium, titanium, tin, nickel, iron, copper, chromium, manganese and also were mixed with sodium chloride, water and an acrylic binder. In terms of maximum voltage and current obtained at room temperature and ease of application, praseodymium and titanium oxide were optimal. Finally, the entire cell was encased in a plastic sheet and heat sealed with anode and cathode contacts exposed. One basic cell was the size of a typical 8.5×11 inch sheet of paper and the thickness of roughly 8 sheets of paper. It should be noted that cells made with manganese oxide were able to be recharged and therefore can also serve as a charge storage device.


In terms of operating temperature, different materials should and can be used. For example in the case of the cell made with aluminum sheets, praseodymium oxide and graphite, the operating temperature should be below the melting temperature of aluminum and should be much lower because of the presence of water. The use of a cell containing water as part of the ionic solution, implies that the operating temperature be below water's boiling point or that the cell, be externally pressurized in order to hold its integrity from expanding water vapor. A high temperature cell might include tungsten (melting point 3695 K) as the cathodes and anodes, graphite (melting point 4300-4700 K) or another carbon material and thorium oxide (melting point 3573 K). The use of sodium chloride as the ionic fluid for charge carrier enhancement would allow a theoretical maximum operating temperature that is below its 1738 degrees Kelvin boiling temperature.


If a ionic fluid can be used with a melting point close to thorium oxide, then the maximum operating temperature would be somewhere below the 3573 K melting point of Kelvin. Note that a single one square meter cell using tungsten, graphite and thorium oxide erogating 100 micro amps at 1 volt (0.0001 watts) at room temperature would theoretically erogate at 3000 K around 1 Amp at 10 Volts (10 watts). Thus, an increase in operating temperature from 300 K to 3000 K results in a 100,000 times increase in power output of a device. This assumes of course, that the ionic fluid works properly at this higher temperature.


A second example also considers the use of ceramics that have been bisque fired into tiles. Onto these tiles may be applied the carbon paste and then the metal cathodes applied as above or simply held in place by pressure. Since in this case the oxide layer is in the form of a much more stable ceramic, operating temperatures can be higher. In any case, this embodiment should still be sealed to contain the electrolytic fluid.


Experimental Results


FIG. 1C is a perspective view taken from the corner of a cell. A conductive sheet or foil 20 is used as a base onto which is applied any donor material 21 at a proper thickness that will manifest a voltage difference across interface between the conductor 20 and the donor material 21. Conductors used for sheet or foil 20 include but are not limited to aluminum, copper, iron, steel, stainless steel, zinc-coated stainless steel and carbon plates. Additional conductors could include any of the other metals or metallic alloys not already mentioned. The donor material 21 can be but is not limited to the materials tested so far which exhibited a voltage differential and good conductivity-praseodymium oxide mix containing also zirconium and silica compounds, chromium oxide and silicon carbide.


Voltages manifested at the interface between sheet or foil 20 and donor material 21 are also influenced by the presence of moisture content or other charge carrier enabling fluids and compounds. Titanium oxide, zinc oxide, tin oxide, aluminum oxide, cuprous oxide, cupric oxide and Fe2O2 iron oxide all manifested discernible voltages with the addition of a charge carrier fluid consisting of the following ingredients in any proportion: water, propylene glycol and sodium chloride. The charge carrier (ionic) fluid can consist of any fluid that enables the development of the interface voltage between sheet or foil 20 and donor material 21. Propylene glycol and salt increases the temperature range over which the ionic fluids stay liquid and in motion.


Onto layer 23, the donor material, is applied the layer 22 which should not be the same conductor as layer 20 since the voltage created would be the same as that between layers 20 and 21, thus canceling out any voltage potential created at the interface between layers 21 and 22, once the three layers 20, 21, 22 are formed together. Instead an effective conductor for layer 22 was determined to be a graphite paste, containing graphite, water and an acrylic binder used for making paints. Other carbon powders can work just as graphite has. The graphite paste created a voltage potential of 1 volt between layers 20 and 22. Layer 23 can be the same metal as that used in layer 20. In the case of an aluminum, praseodymium oxide, graphite, aluminum layered cell, the positive lead is denoted by 25 in FIG. 1C and the negative lead is denoted by 24 in FIG. 1C. The theoretical electric symbol of the cell is denoted by FIG. 1B, where the internal resistance of the cell 27 is in series with the voltage potential 28.



FIG. 3 shows the current flow as a function of time for three different scenarios (graphed line 31, 32 and 33) of a layered and heat plastic sealed aluminum foil, praseodymium oxide and carbon graphite cell attached to a 100,000 ohm resistor. Also is shown the current flow (graphed line 34 of FIG. 3) of a larger steel-praseodymium oxide-carbon graphite-zinc coated steel cell attached to a 100,000 ohm resistor.


Graphed current line 31 shows the current spiking to 3.2 EE-5 Amps from zero and then descending at a descending rate.


Graphed current line 32 shows the current spiking to 2.8 EE-5 Amps from zero and then descending at a descending rate. This was after the cell was rested for 10 minutes.


Graphed current line 33 shows the current spiking to 4 EE-5 Amps from zero and then descending at a descending rate. This was after the cell was heated vigorously in boiling water for a few minutes.


Graphed current line 34 shows the current rising to 2.7 EE-5 Amps at room temperature for the larger steel cell. The current here is steadier and descends more slowly. This is a function of the surface area of this cell, which allows electrons to move across the depletion zone more readily.



FIG. 4. Shows the voltage as a function of time for three different scenarios (graphed lines 45, 46 and 47) measured across a layered and heat plastic sealed aluminum foil, praseodymium oxide and carbon graphite cell attached to a 100,000 ohm resistor. Also is shown the voltage measured as a function of time 48 of a larger steel-praseodymium oxide-carbon graphite-zinc coated steel cell attached to a 100,000 ohm resistor.


Graphed voltage line 45 shows the open circuit voltage at time zero equal to 4.5 volts. When the circuit is closed with a 100,000 ohm resistor, the voltage descends downward at a descending rate.


Graphed voltage line 46 shows the open circuit voltage at time zero equal to 4.2 volts. When the circuit is closed with a 100,000 ohm resistor, the voltage descends downward at a descending rate. This result was after the cell was rested for 10 minutes from the earlier discharge shown in Voltage line 45 and current line 31 of FIG. 3.


Graphed voltage line 47 of FIG. 4 shows the open circuit voltage at time zero equal to 4.9 volts. When the circuit is closed with a 100,000 ohm resistor, the voltage descends downward at a descending rate. This result was after the cell was heated vigorously in boiling water for 2 minutes and rested (open circuit) for 10 minutes.


Graphed voltage line 48 of FIG. 4 shows the room temperature open circuit voltage at zero equal to 3 volts for the larger steel-praseodymium oxide-carbon/graphite-zinc coated steel cell. When the circuit is closed with a 100,000 ohm resistor, the voltage descends downward at a very slow rate. This cell was considerably larger in area than the cell used in voltage plots 45 through 47 and discharges much more slowly while recharging itself more quickly.


It bears repeating that the amount of current that is erogable by the cell is directly proportional to the area of the interface between the layers in the cell. In addition, the current erogable by the cell is polynomially proportional to the ambient temperature of the cell. These two most important factors for a given cell structure should be taken into account when a cells dimensions are being determined. When space is at a premium, the ambient temperature of the cell should be maximized. When space is not at a premium, then more consideration can be given to a larger cell array operating at lower temperatures.



FIG. 5 shows the voltage-current graph for the steel, praseodymium oxide, carbon/graphite and zinc plated steel cell. The voltage-current line 59 for this particular cell at room temperature is as follows:






V=−5.6356*I+Voc





or






V=−5.6356I+2.64.


Given that power P=V×I, we have P=−5.6356*I{circumflex over ( )}2+Voc*I






dP/dI=−5.6356*2*I+Voc


equating dP/dI=0 and solving for I we get






I max=−Voc/(5.6356*2)=2.64/(5.6356*2)=0.23423 EE-5 Amps


This is the current at which power output is maximized and would result from a load of






R max=(−5.6356*I max+Voc)/I max=563560 Ohms.



FIG. 6. is a lateral cross-sectional view of several stacked power cells in series 64 contained in an insulated container 60 with an insulating lid 61. The stacked cells 64 have positive 65 and negative 66 leads that come out of the container 60 and attach to a controller circuit 72. The logic of the controller circuit is illustrated in FIG. 2. The controller circuit 72 uses power from the cells through the leads 65 and 66. The controller circuit measures temperature through a connection 69 to a thermocouple device 63.


To maintain the rated voltage across leads 70 and 71, the controller circuit 72 uses the power from the cell 64 to increase the temperature in the insulated container 60, 61 by heating the inside of the container 60 through the use of the solenoid 62 attached to the leads 68 and 67. The controller cell 72 is preprogrammed to cause an optimal temperature rise as well as prevent the overheating of the insulated container's 60 cavity. Note that the drop in temperature of the inside of the container 60, 61 would be due to the effects of conduction of heat out of the container through the walls, wires and lid of the container and not through the conversion of heat into electricity.


Integration of Cells into Energy Systems


Because of the absence of a need for a temperature differential, many interesting system designs can be employed for the use of the herein mentioned cell.


A number of cells, connected in series or parallel can be placed together and will supply energy in the form of direct current to various uses. An inverter should be used to convert DC to AC where necessary. Because the built-in voltage of the cells vary with temperature, a DC-to-DC converter to furnish predictable DC voltage will be necessary.


Cells in various combinations can be encased in a heat trap, to produce higher working voltages and power output. In the case of electromagnetic radiation (sunlight, artificial light, etc.), the cells may be placed in a light absorbing medium which converts light to heat. See FIG. 8—an oxide carbon cell encased in glass or plastic with black body absorber that converts sunlight to heat and stores it.


The efficiency of any system employing these cells will depend on the ability of the system to store heat and prevent its loss away from the cells. Cells may be used in a cascading manner by which outer cells, convert ambient heat to electricity, which is then converted to heat at the center most cells. In this way, cells themselves are used as the insulating medium, moving heat up stream to warmer areas. In addition, a completely encapsulated or isolated system would result in an extremely efficient generator, in that heat could be incorporated into the system in a contactless manner, through the use of induction heating and a susceptor. The correct material used as the encapsulant would greatly reduce the loss of heat energy. Encapsulants could include ceramics, plastics, epoxies and acrylics. See FIG. 6 for a logical design of an isolated/encapsulated system diagram.


The device generates electricity at room temperature. Immersing the device into a heat bath causes a proportional rise in voltage (proportional to device temperature in Kelvin) and an exponential rise in current. Consequently, lowering ambient temperature of the device reduces the manifested voltage. Because of the heat-voltage-power characteristics, a more efficient system would be to keep the device in an insulated container or embedded in a thermally and electrically insulating material. The ambient temperature inside the container could be increased, depending on the power outputs needs, by the use of an inductive heater. To avoid losing heat inside the device from conduction through the output wires, power could be extracted from the device by converting its current from direct to alternating and using a transformer device to extract current from the generated magnetic field.


While the technology has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred examples, it is to be understood that the inventions are not to be limited to the disclosed examples, but on the contrary, are intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A solid state energy device comprising at least one cell, the at least one cell comprising two electrodes, wherein the first electrode comprises a layer of solid, planar donor material on a conductive base, in direct contact with the second electrode comprising a layer of solid, planar acceptor material on a conductive base, both conductive bases in electrical contact with a circuit; the at least one cell further characterized by an ionic material absorbed or incorporated into the at least one cell to facilitate the flow of electrons from one side of the at least one cell to the other, thereby creating an at least one cell with an electric potential across the interface of the donor and acceptor materials.
  • 2. A solid state energy device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ionic material is a liquid or a solid.
  • 3. A solid state energy device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the donor material is an n-type material that is conductive.
  • 4. A solid state energy device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the donor material comprises graphite or another carbon powder.
  • 5. A solid state energy device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ionic material consists of the following ingredients in any proportion: water, propylene glycol and sodium chloride.
  • 6. A method for pushing current through a resistive load, the method including connecting a resistive load to a device as claimed in claim 1.
  • 7. A method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the resistive load is such that it allows the recombination of electrons and holes to occur at a rate that maintains a constant voltage and current.
  • 8. A method as claimed in claim 6, further adding heat from thermal or electromagnetic sources to cause free electrons to gain kinetic energy and thereby increase the built-in voltage of the at least one cell.
  • 9. The solid state device as in claim 1, further including an insulative sealant around the at least one cell.
  • 10. The solid state device as in claim 1, wherein the donor material and the acceptor material are crystalline.
  • 11. A solid state generator comprising at least one cell, the at least one cell comprising two planar layers of dissimilar materials with differing electron density and configuration, in direct contact with each other, wherein the first layer comprises a layer of solid, planar donor material on a conductive base, in direct contact with the second layer comprising a layer of solid, planar acceptor material on a conductive base, both conductive bases in electrical contact with a circuit, thereby creating an at least one cell with an electric potential across the interface of the donor and acceptor materials.
  • 12. The solid state generator as in claim 11, wherein an ionic material is absorbed or incorporated into the at least one cell to facilitate the flow of electrons from one side of the at least one cell to the other.
  • 13. The ionic material as claimed in claim 12, wherein the ionic material is a liquid or a solid.
  • 14. A solid state energy device as claimed in claim 11, wherein the donor material is an n-type material.
  • 15. A solid state energy device as claimed in claim 11, wherein the donor material comprises graphite or another carbon powder.
  • 16. A solid state energy device as claimed in claim 11, wherein the ionic material consists of the following ingredients in any proportion: water, propylene glycol, and salt, including sodium chloride.
  • 17. A method for pushing current through a resistive load, the method including connecting a resistive load to a device as claimed in claim 11.
  • 18. A method as claimed in claim 17, wherein the resistive load is such that it allows the recombination of electrons and holes to occur at a rate that maintains a constant voltage and current.
  • 19. A method as claimed in claim 17, further adding heat from thermal or electromagnetic sources to cause free electrons to gain kinetic energy and thereby increase the built-in voltage of the at least one cell.
  • 20. The solid state device as in claim 11, further including an insulative sealant around the at least one cell.
  • 21. The solid state device as in claim 11, wherein the donor material and the acceptor material are crystalline.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 11/543,001, filed Oct. 4, 2006, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/723,696, filed on Oct. 5, 2005, the disclosures of both of which are incorporated herein by reference.