Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The present invention pertains to an exercise apparatus and method used to create a continuous-motion rope climbing machine that maintains a constant rope speed and resistance regardless of the climber's weight or force exerted.
Rope climbing offers an effective means for developing strength by placing the climber's arm and back muscles under constant tension while ascending and descending a rope. Leg muscles are also engaged as the climber pinches the rope between his feet to maintain elevation and support the weight of his body while the arms are repositioned to either move up or down the rope.
Rope climbing is often done by affixing a length of rope to an elevated point on a building and the resistance is created by the force of gravity exerted on the climber's mass. This form of rope climbing is inaccessible unless the climber possesses sufficient upper body strength to support his own weight.
Muscle mass is increased by fatiguing and tearing down the targeted muscle fibers and an effective exercise works those muscles to the point of failure. This poses a problem when that fatigue occurs at the top of a rope suspended at an unsafe elevation. A number of rope climbing machines have been designed to avoid this dilemma by offering endless loop climbing machines. These machines are positioned near the ground and allow the climber to ascend and/or descend a length of rope, exercising to failure without the fear of falling.
Rope climbing machines generally create resistance by threading a length of rope through a system of friction and drag mechanisms, employing a plurality of channels, pulleys or hydraulic cylinders and requiring the user to manually tension the device. Other designs use microprocessor controlled systems to set a desired resistance. Both of these approaches are affected by the user's weight and the resistance and rope speed are compromised as greater force is exerted by the climber.
Exercise machines traditionally require the user to move a fixed resistance or weight through a particular range of motion (ROM.) The movement of the device varies in speed throughout the ROM depending on the exercise being undertaken and the resistance system being used. In rope climbing, the climber reaches one arm over the head, grasps the rope and pulls down, advancing the body up the rope length. The opposite arm then reaches above the head to repeat the ROM cycle.
A climber exerts a greater force on the rope when the ROM cycle begins due to the leverage exerted by the arm. The body is hoisted up the rope length, causing the rope to advance more quickly until the climber's gripping hand is at waist level. In a traditional climbing machine this variation in the acceleration of the rope within the resistance mechanism results in non-uniform tensioning. Consequently, the force exerted by the arm at the bottom of the exercise stroke is generally much less than it was at the top of that stroke. This variation in tension of the climber's muscles results in a less efficient form of exercise and may increase the risk of injury.
There is a growing trend in exercise called isokinetics. This is a strength training method that blends the intense muscular contractions experienced in isometric exercise with the full range of motion required in isotonic workouts. Isokinetic machines require the targeted muscle groups to overcome a substantially constant resistance throughout the entire ROM of the exercise. In a rope climbing machine, this is accomplished by generating a constant rope speed regardless of the climber's weight or force exerted. This dynamic tensioning maintains the climber's muscles in a constant state of strain and contraction, accelerating muscle fatigue and consequently assisting in the break down and subsequent rebuilding of stronger muscles.
There have been several attempts to create exercise machines that exert a constant opposing force. U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,466 suggested the regulation of resistance through the use of a microprocessor controlled electro-hydraulic system. The apparatus requires the collection of strength input data to calculate a constant resistance and apply the required opposing force using a solenoid type pressure control valve. The problem with this design is that it calculates the needed resistance by measuring strength input data collected at the beginning of the workout. It then applies the calculated resistance only at fixed application points in the motion of the device's working arm. The user's strength will likely be greater at the beginning of the workout making this calculated resistance excessive as the workout progresses. This device does not compensate for the reduction in muscle strength as the workout progresses and may lead to injury.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,060,938 suggests the use of a series of pulleys and a drum with several circumferential grooves to create a constant opposing force while the machine is use. The climber is required to select a weight and must pull with enough force to lift this weight from a teeterboard to engage a drag mechanism. The device demands a great deal of floor space and requires the user to select and lock the needed weights with a pin system. The need to pull that weight with sufficient force to engage the resistance mechanism may subject the user to injury.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,811,204 suggests the use of a braking system comprised of a motor or governor and a series of springs or weight plates to maintain a constant rope speed by transferring rotational forces from inertial to linear forces. As the user pulls on the rope, the force rotates a sprocket causing a governor to spin. When excessive force is exerted on this governor a brake disk engages, increasing the resistance within the machine. The friction employed in this mechanical apparatus will eventually wear the braking system making it less effective over time. This machine is overly complex and requires the user to select an offsetting weight; the harder one pulls on the machine, the faster the machine will move. This design is not intended to support the climber's weight and merely engages the user's arms in a cardiovascular workout similar to that of a rowing machine.
There is therefore a need in the art for a less complicated isokinetic rope climbing machine, capable of instantaneously sensing and adjusting the pressure within the system to maintain a constant resistance regardless of the weight or force applied by the climber.
The present invention addresses the problems discussed above by offering a climbing machine that maintains a constant resistance and therefore a constant rope speed for the climber.
A greater weight or force applied by the climber will result in a greater force on the resistance mechanism. A pressure compensated control valve mounted within this mechanism senses any changes in force or weight The application of force or weight of the climber, causes more or less fluid to enter the pressure compensated control valve where a pressure compensating spool is in fluid communication with a pressure adjustment chamber inside the valve. This pressure compensating spool shifts position in response to and in synchrony with an increase or decrease in pressure within the pressure adjustment chamber, consequently allowing or inhibiting rotation of the hydraulic pump shaft. The pressure within this valve regulates the movement of fluid within the hydraulic pump and governs the rotation of the friction sheave to generate a constant rope speed. The movement of the pressure compensating spool within the pressure adjustment chamber maintains a constant pressure drop across the speed adjustment orifice. In a typical hydraulic rope climbing machine the higher the pressure, the higher the flow rate, and the faster the climbing rope will move and vice versa; however, the use of a pressure compensated flow control valve in the present invention ensures that the climbing rope speed will remain constant regardless of pressure.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a safe, compact and straight forward method and apparatus that simulates the motion of natural rope climbing while offering a constant rope speed, subjecting the targeted muscle groups to isokinetic resistance. It is a further object of this invention to offer a wide variation in rope speed to accommodate varying abilities of the climbers.
As previously mentioned, isokinetic exercise puts a constant dynamic tension on the targeted muscles. Because the force remains constant, the risk of injury is significantly reduced making this an ideal means for rehabilitation of injured or compromised muscles. In the preferred embodiment, the rope is oriented in the vertical position. A seat may be added to assist those with reduced mobility or a fear of falling. The support structure may also be modified such that the rope is oriented in a horizontal position, allowing the user to pull the rope in a tug-of-war style or alternatively to lie on one's back and pull the rope overhead. Foot holds may also be added to improve the user's stance.
In this patent application cords, strings, filaments, cables and flexible chains will be generally referred to as “rope.”
Referring to
Looking now to
Referring now to
Referring now to the arrows depicting fluid movement in
The bias spring 105 compensates for the pressure differential between the flow rate orifice 65 and the exit orifice 95. Pressure at the exit orifice 95 is transferred to the bias spring chamber 108, causing the bias spring 105 to either advance or retract within this chamber 108 thereby increasing or decreasing the spring force exerted on the bias spring 105. Incoming fluid at the entrance orifice 90 pushes the pressure compensating spool 75 forward until resistance from the bias spring 105 prevents further movement of the pressure compensating spool 75. The position of the pressure compensating spool 75 determines the volume of fluid within the pressure adjustment chamber 100, regulating fluid flow to the flow rate orifice 65 and thereby regulating the rotation of the hydraulic pump shaft 44 shown in
Rope speed is determined by the fluid flow which may be selected by manually adjusting the flow rate orifice needle 70 position within the PCFC valve. Alternatively, the flow adjustment may be altered using a selector mechanism such as the rack and pinion control cable design depicted with more particularity in
While the above description contains many specifics, these should be considered exemplifications of one or more embodiments rather than limitations on the scope of the invention. As previously discussed, many variations are possible and the scope of the invention should not be restricted by the examples illustrated herein.
This application claims benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/598,240 of Mark Small filed Dec. 13, 2017, entitled ISOKINETIC ROPE CLIMBING METHOD AND MACHINE the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
641519 | Kerns | Jan 1900 | A |
3782718 | Saylor | Jan 1974 | A |
4846466 | Stima, III | Jul 1989 | A |
5060938 | Hawley, Jr. | Oct 1991 | A |
5076574 | Johnson, Jr. | Dec 1991 | A |
5496234 | Sussich | Mar 1996 | A |
7018323 | Reynolds | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7060003 | Reynolds | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7303506 | Reynolds | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7727118 | McCall | Jun 2010 | B1 |
8307851 | Warsowe | Nov 2012 | B2 |
10016645 | Reynolds | Jul 2018 | B1 |
20040014568 | Williams | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050148437 | Ryan | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070270287 | McDonnell | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Screen captures from YouTube video clip entitled “Pressure Compensated Flow Control—Part 1,” 9 pages, uploaded on Mar. 6, 2017 by user “LunchBox Sessions”. Retrieved from Internet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCPJvrEiXCA (Year: 2017). |
“Pressure-compensated Flow Control Valves,” posted on Jan. 6, 2011, 2 pages, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.valvehydraulic.info/creation-and-control-of-fluid-flow/pressure-compensated-flow-control-valves.html (Year: 2011). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190175972 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62598240 | Dec 2017 | US |