An issue that many electronic designers are faced with is “crosstalk.” Crosstalk refers to electromagnetic radiation produced by one electrical signal path that induces an undesirable current in another signal path. Crosstalk manifests itself as “noise” on the affected signal path. Depending on the application, the type of information encoded in the signals, and other factors, crosstalk can be disruptive and even disabling to an electronic device or system.
An integrated circuit is disclosed that contains at least one electrically isolated channel. The integrated circuit may include a first transistor, a second transistor, and a third transistor. The second transistor may be disposed between the first and third transistors. A terminal of the second transistor may be grounded precluding the second transistor from being used as a switch.
For a detailed description of the exemplary embodiments of the invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims to refer to particular system components. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, computer companies may refer to a component by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not function. In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . ”. Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct electrical connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct connection, or through an indirect connection via other devices and connections.
The following discussion is directed to various embodiments of the invention. Although one or more of these embodiments may be preferred, the embodiments disclosed should not be interpreted, or otherwise used, as limiting the scope of the disclosure, including the claims, unless otherwise specified. In addition, one skilled in the art will understand that the following description has broad application, and the discussion of any embodiment is meant only to be exemplary of that embodiment, and not intended to intimate that the scope of the disclosure, including the claims, is limited to that embodiment.
In accordance with exemplary embodiments of the invention, an integrated circuit may include a plurality of conductive pathways (generally referred to as “channels”) with at least one channel being isolated from the other channels. Without limitation, the integrated circuit may comprise a multi-channel FET switch assembly which may include an isolated channel. “Isolated” in this context means that radiated electromagnetic energy from the non-isolated channels in the FET switch assembly may not detrimentally affect the isolated channel, or at least interfere with the isolated channel below an acceptable level.
Referring now to
In accordance with various embodiments, the clock (“CLK”) channel may be isolated from the other data channels D0–D7. The isolation may be provided by sandwiching the clock channel, which may include FET 44, between two ground conductive pathways 42. Conductive pathways may be implemented as traces internal to the FET switch assembly 30. The ground pathways 42 provide shielding for the clock channel to reduce the amount of noise generated by the various data channels from impinging on the clock channel.
In
The embodiment of
In yet another embodiment,
The FET switch assembly with isolated channel described above may be used in a computer system 100 comprising a central processing unit (“CPU”) 102, bridge logic 104, memory 106, input/output devices (e.g., display 112, keyboard 146, mouse 148) and other logic coupled together. See e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,401,157, incorporated herein by reference, for an exemplary computer system embodiment. The FET switch assembly may be implemented on an expansion bus usable for add-in cards as is commonly known.
Referring now the
The FET switch assembly described above includes at least one channel that is isolated from other channels to minimize or prevent crosstalk contamination of the isolated channel. The above discussion is meant to be illustrative of the principles and various embodiments of the present invention. Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. For example, more than one isolated channel can be included in the FET switch assembly. Further, although the clock channel is considered the isolated channel in the discussion above, it could also be said that the data channels are isolated from the clock channel. Thus, any noise from the clock channel will be prevented, or reduced, from interfering with the data channels. Further still, the use of the isolated channel can be for any desired signal, not just a clock signal. Also, all of the aforementioned isolation techniques can be implemented together to provide the desired isolation. The various embodiments described herein are not limited to just FET switch assemblies and can be extended to other types of integrated circuits in which crosstalk is a concern between channels or signals in the same device. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3189758 | Bell | Jun 1965 | A |
4459621 | Okano | Jul 1984 | A |
4649505 | Zinser et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4845482 | Howard et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5003512 | Geddes | Mar 1991 | A |
5808502 | Hui et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818884 | Reymond | Oct 1998 | A |
5835049 | Nagaraj | Nov 1998 | A |
5870573 | Johnson | Feb 1999 | A |
5914844 | Lutley et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6184702 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189058 | Jones, III et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6236585 | Hill | May 2001 | B1 |
6401157 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6452424 | Shamlou et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6507935 | Aingaran et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511884 | Quek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6536022 | Aingaran et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538780 | Murphy et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6574128 | Morgan | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6664839 | Ootake et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6807236 | Fujimura | Oct 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
740346 | Oct 1996 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040183567 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |