Pay-as-you-go or pay-per-use business models have been used in many areas of commerce, from cellular telephones to commercial Laundromats. In developing a pay-as-you go business, a provider, for example, a cellular telephone provider, offers the use of hardware (a cellular telephone) at a lower-than-market cost in exchange for a commitment to remain a subscriber to their network. In this specific example, the customer receives a cellular phone for little or no money in exchange for signing a contract to become a subscriber for a given period of time. Over the course of the contract, the service provider recovers the cost of the hardware by charging the consumer for using the cellular phone.
The pay-as-you-go business model is predicated on the concept that the hardware provided has little or no value, or use, if disconnected from the service provider. To illustrate, should the subscriber mentioned above cease to pay his or her bill, the service provider deactivates their account, and while the cellular telephone may power up, calls cannot be made or received because the service provider will not allow communication to the cellular telephone. The deactivated phone has no “salvage” value, because the phone will not work elsewhere and the component parts do not have a significant street value. When the account is brought current, the service provider will re-allow use of the device to make calls.
This model works well when the service provider, or other entity taking the financing risk, has a tight control on the use of the hardware. The model does not work well when the hardware has substantial uses outside the service provider's span of control, such as that of a computer, where the computer may be useful whether connected to a service provider network or not. Therefore there is a need to monitor and correct unauthorized configuration of a computer that could move the computer beyond the service provider's span of control.
According to one aspect of the disclosure, an isolated computing environment may provide for securely storing programs and information used to monitor and enforce policies related to configuration and operation of a computer. The isolated computing environment may have a secure memory, for storing or validating verification and enforcement programs, cryptographic keys and other data requiring limited access. The isolated computing environment may further have a clock or timer and a logic circuit responsive to the clock or timer for activating the verification program. When a state of the computer is determined not to be in compliance with terms required under a pay-per-use or other business agreement, the enforcement program may initiate a sanction, to correct or encourage a user to correct the non-compliant state of the computer.
A method for assembling a computer using an isolated computing environment may include disposing the isolated computing environment on a motherboard of the computer, either directly or indirectly, and may include attaching the isolated computing environment to the motherboard in a manner that irreparably damages the computer if removed. The isolated computing environment may also be tested as part of the assembly process.
Although the following text sets forth a detailed description of numerous different embodiments, it should be understood that the legal scope of the description is defined by the words of the claims set forth at the end of this disclosure. The detailed description is to be construed as exemplary only and does not describe every possible embodiment since describing every possible embodiment would be impractical, if not impossible. Numerous alternative embodiments could be implemented, using either current technology or technology developed after the filing date of this patent, which would still fall within the scope of the claims.
It should also be understood that, unless a term is expressly defined in this patent using the sentence “As used herein, the term ‘——————’ is hereby defined to mean . . . ” or a similar sentence, there is no intent to limit the meaning of that term, either expressly or by implication, beyond its plain or ordinary meaning, and such term should not be interpreted to be limited in scope based on any statement made in any section of this patent (other than the language of the claims). To the extent that any term recited in the claims at the end of this patent is referred to in this patent in a manner consistent with a single meaning, that is done for sake of clarity only so as to not confuse the reader, and it is not intended that such claim term by limited, by implication or otherwise, to that single meaning. Finally, unless a claim element is defined by reciting the word “means” and a function without the recital of any structure, it is not intended that the scope of any claim element be interpreted based on the application of 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph.
Much of the inventive functionality and many of the inventive principles are best implemented with or in software programs or instructions and integrated circuits (ICs) such as application specific ICs. It is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation. Therefore, in the interest of brevity and minimization of any risk of obscuring the principles and concepts in accordance to the present invention, further discussion of such software and ICs, if any, will be limited to the essentials with respect to the principles and concepts of the preferred embodiments.
Many prior art high-value computers, personal digital assistants, organizers and the like may not be suitable for use in a pre-pay or pay-for-use business model without additional security. As discussed above, such equipment may have significant functions apart from those requiring a service provider. For example, a personal computer can be disconnected from a provided Internet service and still be useful for word processing, spreadsheets, etc. In the case where a service provider, for example an Internet service provider or other business entity, underwrites the cost of the personal computer with the expectation of future fees, this “untethered value” creates an opportunity for fraudulent applications and theft. Pre-pay business models, where a user pays in advance for use of a subsidized, high value computing system environment is one example of such a risk for fraud and theft.
Computer 110 typically includes a variety of computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by computer 110 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can accessed by computer 110. Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency, infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of the any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer readable media.
The system memory 130 includes computer storage media in the form of volatile and/or nonvolatile memory such as read only memory (ROM) 131 and random access memory (RAM) 132. A basic input/output system 133 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 110, such as during start-up, is typically stored in ROM 131. RAM 132 typically contains data and/or program modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on by processing unit 120. By way of example, and not limitation,
The computer 110 may also include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media. By way of example only,
The drives and their associated computer storage media discussed above and illustrated in
The computer 110 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 180. The remote computer 180 may be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to the computer 110, although only a memory storage device 181 has been illustrated in
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 110 is connected to the LAN 171 through a network interface or adapter 170. When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 110 typically includes a modem 172 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 173, such as the Internet. The modem 172, which may be internal or external, may be connected to the system bus 121 via the user input interface 160, or other appropriate mechanism. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 110, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. By way of example, and not limitation,
The communications connections 170 and 172 allow the device to communicate with other devices. The communications connections 170 and 172 are an example of communication media. The communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. A “modulated data signal” may be a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media. Computer readable media may include both storage media and communication media.
The isolated computing environment 125, discussed in more detail with respect to
The isolated computing environment 125 may be instantiated in more than one manner. When implemented by one or more discrete components, the isolated computing environment 125 may be disposed on the motherboard (not depicted) of the computer. The motherboard may be any circuit interconnect and component mounting base technology suitable for a given application and may range from a fiberglass material, to molded epoxy resin, mylar, ceramic, etc. When the isolated computing environment 125 is disposed on or in the motherboard, the isolated computing environment 125 may be coated in an epoxy or buried beneath interconnect layers or components. Coating or burying the isolated computing environment 125 may serve to increase the difficulty of removing or tampering with the isolated computing environment 125 itself, associated power and ground connections to the isolated computing environment 125 or data and address connections to the isolated computing environment 125. Ideally, the removal or de-lidding of the isolated computing environment 125 causes permanent damage to the motherboard and/or surrounding components and renders the computer 110 inoperable.
Another instantiation of the isolated computing environment 125 may be as depicted in
Referring to
The blocks of the isolated computing environment 125 may be coupled by a bus 212. The bus 212 may be separate from a system or processing unit bus 214 used for external access. Separating the busses may improve security by limiting access to data passed by bus 212. The bus 212 may incorporate security precautions such as balanced data lines to make power attacks on cryptographic keys 216 stored in the memory 202 more difficult.
The memory 202, in addition to storing cryptographic keys 216, may store at least one verification program 218 and at least one enforcement program 220. These programs are discussed in more detail below. Other data 222 may be stored in the memory 202, for example, hash codes and/or other digital signature information associated with known BIOS code or application programs. Another example of data 222 that may be stored in memory 202 is certificate information for verification of downloaded updates to verification programs 218 or enforcement programs 220.
The validation and enforcement programs 218 and 220 are shown stored in the isolated computing environment 125, but may also be stored externally, with a digital signature or hash of the programs stored in the isolated computing environment 125, for example, in the data section 222 of the memory 202. When monitoring or measuring an application program, the isolated computing environment 125 may validate a hash or digital signature of the application program before or during the program's execution. Since the programs 218 and 220 and data stored in memory 202 are part of the security associated with the success of the pay-as-you-go, pay-per-use business model, it may be important that the data be protected from unauthorized access and tampering. Unauthorized access of the memory 202 may be limited using either the logic circuit 204 or the digital signature verification circuit 208 or a combination of the two. The access to the memory may be restricted to processes running a known program code, i.e. a program code trusted by the isolated computing environment 125. The program code may be the validation program 218 or the enforcement program 220. However, other programs may be granted access to the memory 202. For example, an application supporting the management of usage credits or balances may use the memory of the isolated computing environment 125. When repair or maintenance is required, access to the memory 202 may be granted to a service process supported on a networked device having proper credentials in order to effect the repair.
The isolated computing environment 125 may have several functions. One function of the isolated computing environment 125 is to protect itself from unauthorized updates and tampering. Programs and data stored in the isolated computing environment 125 may be injected at the time of manufacture or may be downloaded if correctly signed with the signature authenticated by the isolated computing environment 125 itself. Another function may be to monitor and/or measure the state of the computer 110 to determine if a hack or other unauthorized change in the state of the computer 110 is in process or has occurred. Another aspect of monitoring and measuring may be to support legitimate changes of state of the computer 110 related to functions associated with provisioning resources and hosting secure functions such as an event dispatcher or balance manager. A third function may be to validate current BIOS code and validate updates and extensions to BIOS code. Another function of the isolated computing environment 125 may be to provide a reliable clock or timer both as a source of time for metering programs and expiration dates. The clock or timer may also ensure that the isolated computing environment 125 is routinely granted access to the computer 110 and not “starved” for CPU cycles. Another function may be to enforce sanctions when a non-compliant state is determined in the computer 110.
To protect from unauthorized updates and tampering the memory 202 may be secured. To accomplish this, the memory 202 may be made accessible only to a specific program, for example, an update routine authenticated by a digital signature under the control of a secure operating mode of the computer 110. The memory 202 may be made inaccessible to any program executed by another execution environment such as the operating system or the kernel. The kernel typically runs when the computer 110 is booting. By way of example, x86 processors from Intel™ can be operated in several modes, or rings of execution. Ring 0 is occupied by the kernel, Ring 3 is occupied by the operating system. A third mode SMM/SM (system management mode) is occupied by the BIOS. The program with access to the secure memory 202 may be run in the SMM/SM because it is out of reach of the kernel, but would require securing the BIOS.
Another method of securing the memory 202 may be to create another mode of execution, for example, a Mode Z or Ring −1. The memory 202 may be partitioned according to function such that some areas of memory 202 are only accessible by Mode Z, whereas other areas of memory 202 are read-only from Ring 0. There may be case-specific access to memory 202, such as read access from Ring 0, but only when not in Mode Z. For example, keys 216 may be read-only from Ring 0, but are inaccessible when in Mode Z.
The isolated computing environment 125 may serve to host functions related to provisioning and activating licensed or pay-per-use resources. Such resources may include some or all of the above, for example, network connections 170 and 172, hard disk drive 141, or video interface 190. The isolated computing environment 125 may also host a balance manager that maintains an accounting of pay-per-use resources used and available.
The verification program 218 may monitor or measure a state of the computer 110. The state of the computer 110 may be used to determine the level of compliance of the computer 110 with a set of policies or pre-determined conditions. The pre-determined conditions may be both positive and negative, that is, the policy or condition may require the presence of certain elements, be they hardware, software, peripherals, etc. or the policy may prohibit the presence of certain other elements. For example, one policy may require the presence of a given version of a system driver, while another policy may prohibit the presence of an alternative boot device. To determine compliance, the verification program 218 may monitor the state of a resource used by the operating system, the state of an application program, the state of a BIOS structure or a BIOS extension.
The clock 206 may provide a reliable measure for pay-per-use terms involving periods of time, for example, unlimited use for a month. The clock may also act as a trigger to ensure that the verification and/or enforcement programs 218 and 220 of the isolated computing environment 125 receive enough processor execution cycles to perform their respective tasks. The trigger function may cause the logic circuit 204 to force execution of the verification program 218. The logic circuit may force an interrupt that causes the processing unit to execute from the validation program 218 from the appropriate location.
When the verification program determines non-compliance, a corrective action may instituted. For example, the enforcement program may cause a non-compliant driver to be overwritten with a driver from a known location. Conversely, when the non-compliant state is not automatically correctable, a sanction may be imposed to encourage the user to bring the system into compliance. Sanctions may be invoked by the logic circuit 204 activating the enforcement program 220. To carry out the enforcement task, the isolated computing environment 125, under the direction of the enforcement program, may disable or otherwise sanction resources. The policy may vary according to the state of the computer and may include reducing the processing speed of the computer or reducing the functional operation of the computer, such as booting in “safe mode”. The goal of sanctions is that they be recoverable, and more specifically, be recoverable by the user. However, certain policies may exist that call for disabling the computer 110 to the point that qualified service personnel with special equipment are required to restore service. This may be the case when it is determined that repeated hostile attacks have been attempted over a period of time, despite warnings.
When disposed on the motherboard, the isolated computing environment 125 may be protected 306 from tampering. Tamper-resistant mechanisms are known, but may include potting in epoxy and sandwiching underneath other components. To discourage key theft, metal coatings may be applied to prevent laser probing. As discussed above, the isolated computing environment 125 itself may have separate measures to protect the integrity of its own circuitry and contents.
Before or after disposing 304 on the motherboard, the isolated computing environment 125 may be initialized 308 with executable code, such as verification and enforcement program code 218 and 220. The function of the verification and enforcement programs is discussed above. In addition, keys and other data, such as certificates and known hash codes may be downloaded or injected. Injection usually occurs early in the manufacturing process, such as during chip testing. Later downloading may require cryptographic authentication and/or secure channels.
When assembled, the computer 110 may be tested. To perform a test of isolated computing environment 125 function, one or more of the states of the computer may be altered 310. The alteration may include attaching an unauthorized peripheral, loading/executing unauthorized code, or configuring the computer 110 to operate past an expiration date. Testing 312 the isolated computing environment 125 may be done by determining correct function of the verification program 218 to identify the non-compliant state and that appropriate sanctions are imposed by the enforcement program 220.
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application “Method for pay-as-you-go Computer and Dynamic Differential Pricing,” filed Dec. 8, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/006,837, which is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application, “Method and Apparatus for Provisioning Software,” filed Nov. 15, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/989,122.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4620150 | Germer et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4750034 | Lem | Jun 1988 | A |
4817094 | Lebizay et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4855730 | Venners et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4855922 | Huddleston et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4857999 | Welsh | Aug 1989 | A |
4910692 | Outram et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4967273 | Greenberg | Oct 1990 | A |
5001752 | Fischer | Mar 1991 | A |
5012514 | Renton | Apr 1991 | A |
5249184 | Woest et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5274368 | Breeden et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5301268 | Takeda | Apr 1994 | A |
5355161 | Bird et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5369262 | Dvorkis et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5442704 | Holtey | Aug 1995 | A |
5459867 | Adams et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5473692 | Davis | Dec 1995 | A |
5500897 | Hartman, Jr. | Mar 1996 | A |
5513319 | Finch et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5522040 | Hofsass et al. | May 1996 | A |
5530846 | Strong | Jun 1996 | A |
5563799 | Brehmer et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568552 | Davis | Oct 1996 | A |
5671412 | Christiano | Sep 1997 | A |
5710706 | Markl et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715403 | Stefik | Feb 1998 | A |
5754763 | Bereiter | May 1998 | A |
5758068 | Brandt et al. | May 1998 | A |
5763832 | Anselm | Jun 1998 | A |
5768382 | Schneier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771354 | Crawford | Jun 1998 | A |
5774870 | Storey | Jun 1998 | A |
5793839 | Farris et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802592 | Chess et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825883 | Archibald et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841865 | Sudia | Nov 1998 | A |
5844986 | Davis | Dec 1998 | A |
5845065 | Conte et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5883670 | Sporer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5925127 | Ahmad | Jul 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5949876 | Ginter et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953502 | Helbig, Sr. | Sep 1999 | A |
5983238 | Becker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994710 | Knee et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6021438 | Duvvoori | Feb 2000 | A |
6026293 | Osborn | Feb 2000 | A |
6061794 | Angelo et al. | May 2000 | A |
6101606 | Diersch et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6147773 | Taylor | Nov 2000 | A |
6148417 | da Silva | Nov 2000 | A |
6158657 | Hall, III et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185678 | Arbaugh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188995 | Garst et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189146 | Misra et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192392 | Ginter | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219652 | Carter et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223291 | Puhl | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226747 | Larsson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230185 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233600 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243439 | Arai et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253224 | Brice et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263431 | Lovelace et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272469 | Koritzinsky et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279156 | Amberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286051 | Becker et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289319 | Lockwood | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303924 | Adan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314408 | Salas et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321335 | Chu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327652 | England et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330670 | England et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334189 | Granger et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6363488 | Ginter et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373047 | Adan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385727 | Cassagnol et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6408170 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411941 | Mullor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441813 | Ishibashi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442529 | Krishan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442690 | Howard, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463534 | Geiger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496858 | Frailong et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6571216 | Garg et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6585158 | Norskog | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6587684 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609201 | Folmsbee | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625729 | Angelo et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6646244 | Aas et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6664948 | Crane et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671803 | Pasieka | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690556 | Smola et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694000 | Ung et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704873 | Underwood | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708176 | Strunk et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711263 | Nordenstam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6738810 | Kramer et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6763458 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765470 | Shinzaki | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6791157 | Casto et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6816809 | Circenis | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816900 | Vogel et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6834352 | Shin | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839841 | Medvinsky et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6844871 | Hinckley et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847942 | Land et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6851051 | Bolle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6868433 | Philyaw | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871283 | Zurko et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6920567 | Doherty et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6934942 | Chilimbi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6954728 | Kusumoto et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6957186 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6976162 | Ellison et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6983050 | Yacobi et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6986042 | Griffin | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990174 | Eskelinen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993648 | Goodman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000100 | Lacombe et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7000829 | Harris et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7054468 | Yang | May 2006 | B2 |
7076652 | Ginter et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7096469 | Kubala et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7097357 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103574 | Peinado et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7113912 | Stefik et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121460 | Parsons et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7143297 | Buchheit et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162645 | Iguchi et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171539 | Mansell et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174457 | England et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7207039 | Komarla et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7234144 | Wilt et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236455 | Proudler et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7266569 | Cutter et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7299358 | Chateau et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7353402 | Bourne et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359807 | Frank et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360253 | Frank et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7392429 | Frank et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395245 | Okamoto et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406446 | Frank et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7421413 | Frank et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7441121 | Cutter, Jr. et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7441246 | Auerbach et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7461249 | Pearson et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7464103 | Siu | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7490356 | Lieblich et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493487 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494277 | Setala | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7519816 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7539863 | Phillips | May 2009 | B2 |
7540024 | Phillips et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7549060 | Bourne et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7562220 | Frank et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7565325 | Lenard et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568096 | Evans et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7596784 | Abrams et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7610631 | Frank et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7669056 | Frank et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7694153 | Ahdout et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7770205 | Frank | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809646 | Rose | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7814532 | Cromer et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7877607 | Circenis et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7891007 | Waxman et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7958029 | Bobich et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7979721 | Westerinen et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20010034711 | Tashenberg | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010056413 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002597 | Morrell, Jr. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007310 | Long | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023212 | Proudler | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020046098 | Maggio | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055906 | Katz et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091569 | Kitaura et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107701 | Batty et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112171 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123964 | Kramer et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020124212 | Nitschke et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129359 | Lichner | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138549 | Urien | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141451 | Gates et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147601 | Fagan | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147782 | Dimitrova et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147912 | Shmueli et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184482 | Lacombe et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184508 | Bialick et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193101 | McAlinden | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194132 | Pearson et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005135 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014323 | Scheer | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030027549 | Kiel et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028454 | Ooho et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035409 | Wang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037246 | Goodman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040960 | Eckmann | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046026 | Levy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030048473 | Rosen | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056107 | Cammack et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084104 | Salem et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084278 | Cromer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084337 | Simionescu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084352 | Schwartz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088500 | Shinohara et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093694 | Medvinsky et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097596 | Muratov et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115458 | Song | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126519 | Odorcic | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131252 | Barton et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135380 | Lehr et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149671 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156572 | Hui et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156719 | Cronce | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172376 | Coffin, III et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185395 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030188165 | Sutton et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196102 | McCarroll | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196106 | Erfani et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208338 | Challener et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208573 | Harrison et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229702 | Hensbergen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001088 | Stancil et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003288 | Wiseman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010440 | Lenard et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019456 | Circenis | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023636 | Gurel et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030912 | Merkle, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034816 | Richard | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039916 | Aldis et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039924 | Baldwin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054907 | Chateau et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054908 | Circenis et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059937 | Nakano | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064707 | McCann et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040067746 | Johnson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073670 | Chack et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088548 | Smetters et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093371 | Burrows et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093508 | Foerstner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107359 | Kawano et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040107368 | Colvin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123127 | Teicher et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128251 | Adam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133794 | Kocher et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193919 | Dabbish et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199769 | Proudler | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205357 | Kuo et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220858 | Maggio | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225894 | Colvin | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255000 | Simionescu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021944 | Craft et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028000 | Bulusu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033747 | Wittkotter | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039013 | Bajikar et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050355 | Graunke | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060388 | Tatsumi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065880 | Amato et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080701 | Tunney et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091104 | Abraham | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097204 | Horowitz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102181 | Scroggie et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108547 | Sakai | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108564 | Freeman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125673 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129296 | Setala | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138370 | Goud et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138389 | Catherman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138423 | Ranganathan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141717 | Cromer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144099 | Deb et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050166051 | Buer | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182921 | Duncan | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182940 | Sutton | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188843 | Edlund et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203801 | Morgenstern et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213761 | Walmsley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216577 | Durham et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221766 | Brizek et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235141 | Ibrahim et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240533 | Cutter et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246521 | Bade et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246525 | Bade et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246552 | Bade et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257073 | Bade | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050275866 | Corlett | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278519 | Luebke et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050279827 | Mascavage et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286476 | Crosswy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289177 | Hohmann, II | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289343 | Tahan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010326 | Bade et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015717 | Liu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015718 | Liu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015732 | Liu | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020784 | Jonker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026418 | Bade | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026419 | Arndt et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026422 | Bade et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060055506 | Nicolas | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072748 | Buer | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074600 | Sastry et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075014 | Tharappel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085634 | Jain et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085637 | Pinkas | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089917 | Strom et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100010 | Gatto et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106845 | Frank et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106920 | Steeb et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060156008 | Frank et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165005 | Frank et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168664 | Frank et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206618 | Zimmer et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060213997 | Frank et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060282319 | Maggio | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282899 | Raciborski | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033102 | Frank et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070280422 | Setala | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090070454 | McKinnon, III et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20120137127 | Jain | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1531673 | Sep 2004 | CN |
0635790 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0843449 | May 1998 | EP |
1061465 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1085396 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1387237 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1429224 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1223722 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1460514 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1233337 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2359969 | Sep 2001 | GB |
2378780 | Feb 2003 | GB |
2378780 | Feb 2003 | GB |
H0535461 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H0635718 | Feb 1994 | JP |
H07036559 | Feb 1995 | JP |
H07141153 | Jun 1995 | JP |
H086729 | Jan 1996 | JP |
H08-054952 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2001526550 | May 1997 | JP |
H09185504 | Jul 1997 | JP |
H9251494 | Sep 1997 | JP |
2000293369 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001051742 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2003510684 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001101033 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2003510713 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001184472 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001312325 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001331229 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001338233 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002108478 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002108870 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002374327 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003507785 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003140761 | May 2003 | JP |
2003140762 | May 2003 | JP |
2003157335 | May 2003 | JP |
2003208314 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003248522 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003296487 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004031474 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004062561 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004118327 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004164491 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004295846 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004304755 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2007525774 | Sep 2007 | JP |
20010000805 | Jan 2001 | KR |
20020037453 | May 2002 | KR |
20050008439 | Jan 2005 | KR |
20050021782 | Mar 2005 | KR |
WO-9721162 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO-9811478 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO-0054126 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0135293 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0145012 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO-0163512 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0177795 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-0193461 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-0208969 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-02056155 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO-02103495 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO-03009115 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-03030434 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO-03073688 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO-03107585 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-03107588 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004092886 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2007032974 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US05/40950 mailed Nov. 30, 2006. |
Written Opinion for PCT/US05/40950 mailed Nov. 30, 2006. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2006/034622 mailed Jan. 16, 2007. |
Written Opinion for PCT/US2006/034622 mailed Jan. 16, 2007. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Apr. 22, 2008”, Application No. PCT/US2007/087960, 7 pages. |
Eren, H. et al., “Fringe-Effect Capacitive Proximity Sensors for Tamper Proof Enclosures”, Proceedings of 2005 Sensors for Industry Conference, (Feb. 2005),pp. 22-25. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 15, 2004”, Application No. PCT/US05/40966, 9 pages. |
Schneier, B. “Applied Cryptography, Second Edition: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C (cloth)”, (Jan. 1, 1996),13 pages. |
Goering, Richard “Web Venture Offers Metered Access to EDA Packages—Startup Winds Clocks by the Hour Tools (E*CAD Will Launch Web Site That Provides Pay-Per-Use and Pay-Per-Hour Access to Range of Chip Design Software)”, Electronic Engineering Times, (Nov. 6, 2000),3 pages. |
Zemao, Chen et al., “A Malicious Code Immune Model Based on Program Encryption”, IEEE—Wireless Communication, Networking and Mobile Computing, WICOM '08, 4th International Conference on Oct. 12-14, 2008,(2008),5 pages. |
Mufti, Dr. Muid et al., “Design and Implementation of a Secure Mobile IP Protocol”, Networking and Communication, INCC 204, International Conference on Jun. 11-13, 2004,(2004),5 pages. |
Davida, George I., et al., “UNIX Guardians: Active User Intervention in Data Protection”, Aerospace Computer Security Applications Conference, Fourth Dec. 12-16, (1988),6 pages. |
Morales, Tatiana “Understanding Your Credit Score”, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/04/29/earlyshow/contributors/raymartin/main55152.shtml retrieved from the Intenet on Apr. 23, 2009,3 pages. |
“Achieving Peak Performance: Insights from a Global Survey on Credit Risk and Collections Practices”, GCI Group Pamphlet, (2002, 2004),12 pages. |
“Equifax Business Solutions—Manage Your Customers”, Retrieved from the Internet from http://www.equifax.com/sitePages/biz/smallBiz/?sitePage=manage Customers on Oct. 14, 2005, 3 pages. |
“Prequalification Using Credit Reports”, Retrieved from the Internet at http://www.credco.com/creditreports/prequalification.htm on Oct. 14, 2005, 2 pages. |
Gao, Jerry et al., “Online Advertising—Taxonomy and Engineering Perspectives”, http://www.enqr.sjsu.edu/gaojerry/report/OnlineAdvertising%20.pdf, (2002),33 pages. |
Oshiba, Takashi et al., “Personalized Advertisement-Duration Control for Streaming Delivery”, ACM Multimedia, (2002),8 pages. |
Yue, Wei T., et al., “The Reward Based Online Shopping Community”, Routledge, vol. 10, No. 4, (Oct. 1, 2000),2 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 8, 2007”, Application No. PCT/US05/40967, 5 pages. |
“Final Office Action mailed Feb. 7, 2011”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,214, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final OA Mailed Aug. 30, 2010”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,214, 12 pages. |
“Final Office Action mailed May 11, 2010”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,214, 23 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 30, 2009”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,214, 17 pages. |
“Final Office Action mailed Nov. 18, 2008”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,214, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2008”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,214, 14 pages. |
“Advisory Action mailed Jan. 31, 2011”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/006,837, 3 pages. |
“Final Office Action mailed Nov. 18, 2010”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/006,837, 22 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action mailed May 12, 2010”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/006,837, 27 pages. |
“Advisory Action mailed Mar. 1, 2010”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/006,837, 3 pages. |
“Final Office Action mailed Nov. 10, 2009”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/006,837, 24 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 10, 2009”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/006,837, 18 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 18, 2009”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/989,122, 14 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 4, 2009”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/989,122, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 6, 2008”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/989,122, 12 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2008”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/989,122, 10 pages. |
“Final Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2007”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/989,122, 22 pages. |
Qiao, Daji et al., “MiSer: An Optimal Low-Energy Transmission Strategy for IEEE 802.11 a/h”, obtained from ACM, (Sep. 2003),pp. 161-175. |
“Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 24, 2006”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/989,122, 20 pages. |
“European Search Report”, Mailed Date: Dec. 6, 2010, Application No. EP/05820177, Filed Date: Dec. 7, 2010, pp. 8. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application Serial No. PCT/US05/40940, 18 pages. |
“EP Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings mailed Sep. 27, 2007”, Application No. 05110697.9, 7 pages. |
“Decision to Refuse a European Application mailed Feb. 15, 2008”, Application No. 05110697.9, 45 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 25, 2007”, Application No. PCT/US06/12811, 10 pages. |
“Examiner's First Report mailed Sep. 15, 2009”, AU Application No. 2006220489, 2 pages. |
“Notice of Acceptance mailed Jan. 25, 2010”, AU Application No. 2006220489, 2 pages. |
“The First Office Action mailed Aug. 22, 2008”, CN Application No. 200680006199.2, 23 pages. |
“The Second Office Action mailed Feb. 20, 2009”, CN Application No. 200680006199.2, 9 pages. |
“The Fourth Office Action mailed Jan. 8, 2010”, CN Application No. 200680006199.2, 10 pages. |
“The Fifth Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2010”, CN Application No. 200680006199.2, 6 pages. |
“Notice on Grant of Patent mailed Oct. 20, 2010”, CN Application No. 200680006199.2, 4 pages. |
“First Office Action mailed Aug. 21, 2009”, CN Application No. 200680030846.3, 8 pages. |
“Notice on the First Office Action mailed Dec. 11, 2009”, CN Application No. 200510127170.7, 16 pages. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Jun. 21, 2011”, JP Application No. 2005-330496, 6 pages. |
“The Third Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2009”, CN Application No. 200680006199.2, 7 pages. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Sep. 9, 2011”, JP Application No. 2007-548385, 9 pages. |
Lampson, Butler et al., “Authentication in Distributed Systems: Theory and Practice”, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, v10, 265,(1992),18 pages. |
“DMOD WorkSpace OEM Unique Features”, www.dmod.com/oem—features, Retrieved from the Internet on Jan. 12, 2005,3 pages. |
“Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2009”, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2007/005657, 2 pages. |
“Search Report Dated Jan. 11, 2008”, EP Application No. 05820090.8, 7 pages. |
“Examination Report mailed Mar. 5, 2008”, EP Application No. 05820090.8, 1 page. |
“First Office Action mailed Apr. 11, 2008”, Chinese Application No. 200580038813.9, 11 pages. |
“Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2009”, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2007/005656, 6 pages. |
“Office Action mailed Nov. 30, 2009”, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2007/005659, 6 pages. |
“Second Office Action mailed Dec. 18, 2009”, Chinese Application No. 200580038812.4, 24 pages. |
“Third Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2010”, Chinese Application No. 200580038812.4, 9 pages. |
“Notice on Grant of Patent Right for Invention mailed May 5, 2011”, Chinese Application No. 200580038812.4, 4 pages. |
“Office Action mailed Jul. 7, 2009”, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2007/005660, 8 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report mailed Aug. 13, 2010”, EP Application No. 05823253.9, 7 pages. |
“Notice on the First Office Action mailed Sep. 27, 2010”, Chinese Application No. 20050038745.6, 6 pages. |
“Office Action mailed Jul. 8, 2009”, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2007/005662, 7 pages. |
“Partial Search Report mailed Jul. 23, 2010”, EP Application No. 05821183.0. |
“Extended European Search Report mailed Jan. 7, 2011”, EP Application No. 05821183.0, 9 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 25, 2009”, Chinese Application No. 200580038773.8, 4 pages. |
“Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2009”, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2007/005655, 5 pages. |
“Office Action mailed Feb. 9, 2010”, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2007/005855, 6 pages. |
“Office Action mailed Sep. 24, 2010”, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2007/005655, 3 pages. |
“Office Action mailed Mar. 19, 2010”, EP Application No. 05819896.1, 1 page. |
“Office Action mailed Feb. 10, 2010”, Mexican Applicaiton No. MX/a/2007/005656, 5 pages. |
“Office Action mailed Oct. 18, 2010”, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2007/005656, 3 pages. |
“Notice on the First Office Action mailed Jul. 30, 2010”, Chinese Application No. 200680033207.2, 7 pages. |
“Flonix: USB Desktop OS Solutions Provider, http://www.flonix.com”, Retrieved from the Internet Jun. 1, 2005, (Copyright 2004),2 pages. |
“Migo by PowerHouse Technologies Group, http://www.4migo.com”, Retrieved from the Internet Jun. 1, 2005, (Copyright 2003),3 pages. |
“WebServUSB, http://www.webservusb.com”, Retrieved from the Internet Jun. 1, 2005, (Copyright 2004),16 pages. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Jul. 5, 2011”, Japanese Application No. 2007-541363, 10 pages. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Aug. 5, 2011”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-552142, 8 pages. |
“Forward Solutions Unveils Industry's Most Advanced Portable Personal Computing System on USB Flash Memory Device”, Proquest, PR Newswire, http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=20&did=408811931&SrchMode=1&sid=6&Fmt=3, Retrieved from the Internet Feb. 15, 2008,(Sep. 22, 2003),3 pages. |
“Office Action mailed May, 26, 2008”, EP Application No. 05109616.2, 5 pages. |
“Notice on Division of Application mailed Aug. 8, 2008”, CN Application No. 200510113398.0, (Aug. 8, 2008),2 pages. |
“Notice on First Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2008”, CN Application No. 200510113398.0. |
“The Second Office Action mailed Jul. 3, 2009”, CN Application No. 200510113398.0, 7 pages. |
“Notice on Proceeding with the Registration Formalities mailed Oct. 23, 2009”, CN Application No. 200510113398.0, 4 pages. |
“Examiner's First Report on Application mailed Jun. 4, 2010”, AU Application No. 2005222507, 2 pages. |
“Notice of Acceptance mailed Oct. 14, 2010”, AU Application No. 2005222507, 3 pages. |
“Decision on Grant of a Patent for Invention mailed Apr. 29, 2010”, Russian Application No. 2005131911, 31 pages. |
“TCG Specification Architecture Overview”, Revision 1.2, (Apr. 28, 2004),55 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 19, 2007”, PCT Application No. PCT/US05/46091, 11 pages. |
“Notice on Grant of Patent Right for Invention mailed Jan. 29, 2010”, CN Application No. 200580040764.2, 4 pages. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Jun. 17, 2011”, Japanese Application No. 2007-541361 3 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 6, 2010”, EP Application No. 05820177.3, 8 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report mailed Jan. 21, 2010”, EP Application No. 05819896.1, 8 pages. |
“Office Action mailed May 22, 2009”, Chinese Application No. 200580038771.9, 5 pages. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Jul. 12, 2011”, JP Application No. 2007-541351, 4 pages. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Jul. 22, 2011”, JP Application No. 2007-541362. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Jul. 15, 2011”, JP Application No. 2007-541356, 4 pages. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Jul. 26, 2011”, JP Application No. 2007-541352, 5 pages. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Jul. 22, 2011”, JP Application No. 2007-541355, 4 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12,2011”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,907. |
“Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 30, 2011”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/018,095. |
“EP Office Action mailed Mar. 8, 2012”, EP Application No. 05109616.2, 6 pages. |
“EP Search Report mailed Mar. 8, 2012”, EP Application No. 05109616.2, 6 pages. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Nov. 11, 2011”, Japanese Application No. 2005-301957, 11 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 21, 2011”, EP Application No. 05854752.2, 7 pages. |
“Final Rejection mailed Jan. 17, 2012”, Japan Application No. 2007/552142, 8 pages. |
“Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2011”, JP Application No. 2008-528054, 7 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application Serial No. PCT/US05/40940, 18 pages, mailed Jun. 18, 2008. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Apr. 25, 2007”, Application No. PCT/US05/40965, 5 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 25, 2006”, Application No. PCT/US05/40949, 7 pages. |
“EP Office Action Mailed Nov. 17, 2006”, Application No. 05110697.9, 6 pages. |
“EP Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2007”, Application No. 05110697.9, 5 pages. |
“EP Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings mailed Sep. 27, 2007”, Application No.05110697.9, 7 pages. |
“Decision to Refuse a European Application mailed Feb. 15, 2008”, Application No.05110697.9, 45 pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 8, 2006”, Application No. PCT/US05/40942, 20 pages. |
“Notice of Preliminary Rejection mailed May 30, 2012”, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2007-7011069, 1 page. |
Mois, Dan et al., “Reconfiguration Security for Hardware Agents in Testing”, Automation Quality and Testing Robotics (AQTR), 2010 IEEE International Conference on Volume: 2, (2010), pp. 1-5. |
Zhang, Kai et al., “Reconfigurable Security Protection System Based on Net FPGA and Embedded Soft-Core Technology”, Computer Design and Applications (ICCDA), 2010 International Conference on Volume, (2010), pp. V5-540-V5-544. |
Ooi, Joo G., et al., “A Proof of Concept on Defending Cold Boot Attack”, Quality Electronic Design, ASQED 2009, 1st Asia Symposium, (2009), pp. 330-335. |
Utagawa, Mari et al., “Creation of Card Application by IC Card OS ‘MULTOS’ Which Can Rewrite Application”, Interface, vol. 29, No. 3, ISSN: 0387-9569, CQ Publishing Co. Ltd., (Mar. 1, 2003), pp. 46-55. |
“Notice of Rejection mailed Nov. 11, 2011”, Japanese Application No. 2005-301957, 11 pages (in Japanese). |
“Final Rejection mailed Jan. 17, 2012”, Japan Application No. 2007-552142, 8 pages (in Japanese). |
“Office Action mailed Jul. 4, 2012”, Korean Application No. 10-2007-7012294, 2 pages. |
Extended European Search Report; EP Application No. 05851550.3 of Jul. 5, 2012; 6 pages 6. |
“Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2012”, Japanese Application No. 2005-301957, 8 pages. |
Nakajima, S; “Do You Really Know It? Basics of Windows2000/XP, Network, 4th Installment, What Is Logon Like?,” Nikkei Windows for IT professionals, Jan. 2004 (No. 82); pp. 116-121; Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., Jan. 1, 2004; ISSN: 1346-8308. |
“First Special Feature, Security-oriented Web Application Development, Part 3, Method for Realizing Secure Session Management,” N+I Network Guide, Jan. 2004 (vol. 4, No. 1, Serial No. 32); pp. 47-59; Softbank Publishing Inc., Jan. 1, 2004. |
Reexamination U.S. Appl. No. 90/011,186, filed Aug. 25, 2010. |
Chinese PT Appln. 200580044294.7; Second Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2013; 7 pages. |
Canadian PT Appln. 2,597,231; Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2013; 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060107328 A1 | May 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11006837 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 11022493 | US | |
Parent | 10989122 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 11006837 | US |