1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to devices for measuring electrical current by converting current into a voltage. More particularly, the invention relates to high-bandwidth devices for measuring both direct and alternating currents that are isolated from the circuit being measured.
2. Description of Related and Prior Art
Several techniques for measuring current are known. The simplest one comprises a shunt resistor inserted into the current path. While this method is inexpensive, it provides no isolation, and it consumes excessive power, especially when a large signal amplitude is required.
Another technique employs a Hall-effect current sensor. This kind of sensor provides isolation, good resolution and low losses. Unfortunately, the bandwidth of such a device is limited to a few hundred kilohertz, and the cost is high compared with that of a shunt resistor. Moreover, this sensor exhibits a sizeable temperature drift, even when additional compensating circuitry is employed. Furthermore, to achieve an accuracy that is satisfactory for most purposes, the sensor must be implemented using a relatively large magnetic core with a gap in order to adequately concentrate the magnetic field around the current-carrying conductor. This adds to the bulk, weight, and cost of this type of current sensor.
Recently, current sensors based on the Anisotropic Magneto Resistance (AMR) effect have been introduced. The AMR effect results from the resistance change of ferromagnetic materials in the presence of an applied magnetic field. Using this effect, it is possible to build a sensor with a higher bandwidth than a Hall-effect sensor, but the output voltage of such a sensor is also subject to temperature variations. Furthermore, to generate a sufficient output voltage, an amplifier circuit is required that adds cost to the device. Overall, this sensor is more expensive than either a Hall-effect current sensor or a simple shunt resistor.
The Giant Magnetic Resistance (GMR) effect may also be used for current measurement. This effect results from the magnetic sensitivity of the resistance of a multi-layer structure. Although the GMR effect exhibits a higher sensitivity than the AMR effect, the GMR effect also exhibits a strong non-linear behavior. As of yet, no commercial current sensors based on this technique are available.
Fluxgate-based sensors have better accuracy and temperature behavior than sensors based on any of the above principles but achieve this at remarkably higher cost, and larger physical size. This makes such sensors undesirable for many applications.
Another class of sensors is based on the principle of routing a current to be measured through the primary side of a transformer and using it to hold the transformer core in saturation. A voltage is then applied at the secondary side to force the core into the linear range, creating a current through the secondary side that is proportional to the primary current. This secondary current is then measured using a sense resistor. However, such sensors are unable to measure small currents that are insufficient to saturate the magnetic core.
Currents near zero can be measured with the addition of a bias winding carrying a steady current sized to keep the core in saturation. However, the bias current produces a steady power drain, and furthermore produces a voltage offset at the sense resistor. Therefore, to achieve high accuracy, the current through the bias winding must be controlled to high precision. Furthermore, the bandwidth of this type of current sensor is necessarily quite small because it employs a magnetic core of a ferrite or permalloy material with a large cross-sectional area. In addition, because ferrite and permalloy cores are highly susceptible to temperature changes, this type of sensor exhibits a significant temperature dependence.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved current sensor that measures alternating and direct currents over a large measurement range while exhibiting high-bandwidth and high-accuracy and achieving low power consumption, good isolation from the current being measured, low temperature sensitivity, and low cost.
A high-accuracy, high-bandwidth current sensor is achieved using a transformer comprising a magnetic core, having a primary winding with one or more turns that carries the current to be measured, a secondary winding that is used to sample the primary current, and an auxiliary winding used to selectively bring the core into saturation regardless of the magnitude of the primary current. Alternatively, the auxiliary winding may be eliminated and both the sampling and the saturation function performed using the secondary winding at the cost of a slightly more complex control circuit. This current sensor consumes little power, provides galvanic isolation between the measured current and the sensor, exhibits low temperature sensitivity, and is inexpensive due to the nature of the magnetic core material and the method of controlling the windings.
In several embodiments, discussed below, of a current sensor in accordance with the present invention, a direct current or alternating current is converted into a voltage with a defined and reproducible transfer characteristic. The resulting output voltage of the sensor has an amplitude of several volts that makes it possible to interface directly with an analog-to-digital converter (ADC). The sensor provides isolation between the current to be measured and the sense circuit and induces an average voltage drop on the primary side of zero. The sensor is able to measure positive and negative currents with a bandwidth beyond 1 MHz at minimum power loss. It is also able to accurately measure currents down to zero amps by using a pulsed auxiliary current to selectively saturate the magnetic core material rather than a constant current as employed by prior-art sensors. This method greatly reduces power consumption and the output voltage offset, thereby improving the dynamic range of input current the sensor is able to measure. Because the auxiliary current is pulsed, the auxiliary winding can be adapted to recover a substantial amount of the energy used to control the transformer flux, resulting in a reduction of power losses of up to 50% as compared with prior art sensors. Further, because the invention eliminates the dependency of the offset voltage on the supply voltage, the measurement accuracy is increased over prior-art sensors that use a constant auxiliary current. In addition, because the auxiliary current does not affect the accuracy of the measurement, it can be generated by a very simple and low-cost circuit. A further benefit of the pulsed auxiliary current is that an overcurrent event will not alter the offset voltage, as it does in several prior-art sensors.
The pulsed nature of the auxiliary current enables additional embodiments of the present invention in which the auxiliary winding can be eliminated and the saturation function taken over by the secondary winding. Because the invention does not require a constant current to flow through an auxiliary winding, the secondary winding can be time shared, serving first to saturate the magnetic core and then to sample the primary current. This reduces the size and complexity of the magnetic circuit at a cost of slightly increased circuit complexity. However, if the control circuit and switches are implemented in an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), the increased circuit complexity increases neither the cost nor the bulk of the sensor.
The output voltage of a sensor in accordance with the present invention may be processed digitally to further improve the precision by using curve fitting and temperature compensation techniques well known to those skilled in the art. However, alternative embodiments that do not employ digital correction techniques are also within the scope and spirit of the present invention. Several specific embodiments of a current sensor are discussed below and should be taken as illustrative examples of the advantages afforded by the present invention to one skilled in the art and are not intended to restrict the invention to any particular embodiment.
A first embodiment of a current sensor in accordance with the present invention comprises a transformer with a magnetic core around which are wound a primary winding comprising of one or more turns, a secondary winding used to measure the primary current, and an auxiliary winding used to force the magnetic core into saturation. A programmable saturating switch is used to selectively apply a voltage across the auxiliary winding in order to bring the magnetic core into saturation, even in cases in which the current flowing through the primary winding is insufficient to do so by itself. In order to reduce power consumption, the saturating switch is closed just long enough to ensure that the magnetic core is saturated. The saturating switch is then opened, and a sampling switch is closed. The sampling switch applies a voltage across the secondary winding, and forces the magnetic core back into the linear region. Once there, the current flowing through the secondary winding becomes proportional to the current in the primary winding. This current is converted to a voltage across a sense resistor, and the sense voltage is then sampled by an analog-to-digital converter. The sampling switch is then opened, and the current through the secondary winding freewheels through a set of diodes, eventually returning the circuit back to its original state. The measurement process may be repeated at a frequency limited only by the time required to bring the core out of saturation and into a state in which the measurement signal is stable, and then to reset the circuit after opening the sampling switch. A judicious choice of magnetic core material and geometry enables sampling rates in excess of 1 MHz. Alternatively, because the sensor consumes power only during the measurement process, the power consumption may be further reduced by decreasing the sampling rate.
To minimize offset current and the time required to force the transformer out of saturation, a magnetic material with a low coercive force and highly square B-H loop is selected in an embodiment of a current sensor in accordance with the present invention. The sampling frequency can be increased by reducing the cross sectional area of the core material without affecting the measurement accuracy. Amorphous and nanocrystalline alloys are examples of magnetic materials that exhibit the desired characteristic. While permalloys and supermalloys are generally more costly and exhibit poorer temperature stability, they can be plated onto a substrate that allows for a highly compact geometry. Accordingly, these materials are also within the scope and spirit of the present invention.
A second embodiment of a sensor in accordance with the present invention can be used to measure bidirectional as well as unidirectional currents at a cost of slightly increased power consumption and a dependence of the measurement accuracy on the auxiliary current used to saturate the magnetic core. This is achieved by using the circuit of the first embodiment but changing the switch control scheme. Rather than opening the saturating switch, it is left closed while the sampling switch is closed. The field created by the auxiliary current thus effectively adds to that created by the primary current and results in the appearance of an offset voltage at the sense resistor. Thus, the accuracy of the primary current measurement becomes dependent on the precision of the auxiliary current, but provides the benefit of being able to measure bidirectional currents. Because the auxiliary current is switched off after the voltage of the sense resistor is measured, the overall power consumption of the sensor remains low with respect to prior-art sensors.
A third embodiment of a current sensor in accordance with the present invention includes a modification to the primary-side input circuit to allow the measurement of a voltage source rather than a current source. To do so, a resistor is placed in series with the voltage source in order to generate a current that is routed through the primary winding. Since a large resistor and correspondingly small currents are desirable in order to conserve power, the number of turns of the primary winding may be increased to compensate for the smaller current. This embodiment of a current sensor is particularly useful in applications requiring the measurement of a voltage superimposed upon a high, floating voltage potential and enables the construction of high-bandwidth and high-accuracy voltage probes. This embodiment is also a particularly good low-cost solution when an isolated measurement of a voltage is required, e.g., to overcome the isolation boundary between the primary side and secondary side of an isolated switched mode power supply. It should be noted that no auxiliary power supply is required on the primary side.
A fourth embodiment of a current sensor in accordance with the present invention generates a low-cost analog output by eliminating the analog-to-digital converter and replacing it with a simple sample-and-hold circuit. The sample-and-hold circuit is clocked by the control circuit managing the switches in order to ensure that the sense voltage is captured at the correct moment.
In a fifth embodiment in accordance with the present invention, the output circuit is configured to act as an overcurrent alarm or protection circuit. The voltage across the sense resistor is compared to a reference voltage level using an analog comparator. The output of the comparator is latched using a D-Q flip flop or other latching circuit clocked by the control circuit controlling the switch timings. The output of the D-Q flip flop thus is useful as a stable logic-level overcurrent alarm or protection signal.
In a sixth embodiment of a current sensor in accordance with the present invention, the dynamic range of the current sensor is improved by including one or more range-select switches. The range-select switches allow the control circuit to selectively switch additional resistors into or out of the circuit in parallel or in series with the sense resistor. This enables both low-current and high-current sources to be measured with a single analog-to-digital converter at high relative accuracy by selecting a high range or a low range by changing the position of one or more range-select switches.
A seventh embodiment of a current sensor in accordance with the present invention eliminates the auxiliary winding and uses the secondary winding to saturate the magnetic core before the sampling switch is closed. Because the auxiliary current is required only during time intervals when the sampling switch is closed, the single secondary winding can be time shared between the saturating and sampling functions. Because only two windings are required, this embodiment achieves a higher level of integration and potentially lower cost. This embodiment is particularly well suited for control by an application-specific integrated circuit as is discussed in more detail below. Note, however, that because this embodiment necessarily requires the saturating switch to be opened while the sampling switch is closed, it cannot be used to measure bidirectional currents as described in the second embodiment.
In an eighth embodiment in accordance with the present invention, two copies of a sensor circuit are configured to measure a single primary current in order to provide a continuous measurement of the primary current, thus greatly increasing the measurement bandwidth. The primary current is routed through the primary windings of two transformer cores, and a single control circuit manages two measurement circuits operating in accordance with the present invention. The control circuit periodically switches the output between the two measurement circuits, and as long as the sampling duty cycles of each circuit are maintained greater than 50% and are shifted approximately 180 degrees out of phase, a continuous measurement of the primary current is maintained.
In a ninth embodiment in accordance with the present invention, the sensor is adapted to reduce the power loss by recovering some of the energy used to control the transformer via the auxiliary winding back into the power source. This can reduce the power loss up to 50%. Further, the components count is reduced, which decreases the system cost. This embodiment points out an additional important advantage over prior art sensors that use a constant auxiliary current. Due to the constant auxiliary current in prior art sensors, the auxiliary winding cannot be adapted to recover the energy, and the current that flows after opening the sampling switch is dissipated resulting in substantially higher power loss.
In any of the above-described embodiments, a control circuit may control the timing and duty cycles of a saturating switch and a sampling switch and may also control the timing of an analog-to-digital converter used to sample a voltage developed by a sensing circuit. The control circuit may also control a sample-and-hold circuit or a D-Q flip flop used to sample a sense voltage. The control circuit may comprise a digital signal processor (DSP), a microcontroller, a field programmable gate array (FPGA), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a circuit built from discrete logic, or any other digital control circuit known to those skilled in the art. The use of an analog circuit to control switch timings is also within the scope and spirit of the present invention.
The foregoing descriptions of several embodiments of a current sensor are intended to serve as illustrative examples of the advantages afforded by the present invention to one skilled in the art and are not intended to restrict the invention to any particular set of embodiments. A more complete understanding of a current sensor providing high-accuracy and high-bandwidth current measurements, as well as low temperature sensitivity and low cost, will be afforded to those skilled in the art, as well as a realization of additional advantages and objects thereof, by consideration of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment. Reference will be made to the appended sheets of drawings which will first be described briefly.
a-c depict representative voltage waveforms measured at different locations of a representative embodiment of a current sensor in accordance with the present invention;
The present invention provides a current sensor adapted to measure a current flowing through a primary winding using a magnetic-core transformer that is selectively brought to saturation, regardless of the magnitude of the primary current. The sensor provides high-accuracy and high-bandwidth current measurements as well as low temperature sensitivity and low cost. In the detailed description that follows, like element numerals are used to indicate like elements appearing in one or more of the figures.
In this embodiment, a saturating switch 132 is pulsed closed under the control of a control circuit 102 which could be implemented as a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a digital signal processor (DSP), a microcontroller, or built from discrete digital components. However, it should be appreciated that the saturating switch 132 could also be closed under the control of an analog circuit and still fall within the scope and spirit of the present invention. When the saturating switch 132 is closed, current Iaux flows from power source 110 through the auxiliary winding 130. The magnitude of current Iaux is limited to Vdc/R1, where Vdc is the voltage of power source 110, and R1 is the resistance of the current-limiting resistor 122. The magnitude of this current is chosen to assure that the magnetic core 112 is brought into saturation prior to measurement of the primary current 108. However, it should be noted that when the saturating switch 132 is open, no current flows through the auxiliary winding 130 and therefore, no power is dissipated here during the off cycle.
A sampling switch 124 is pulsed closed under the control of the control circuit 102. When the sampling switch 124 is closed, a voltage is applied at the secondary transformer winding 128 that forces the transformer core 112 out of saturation. Two diodes, 120 and 118, allow the current to freewheel through the secondary winding 128 once the sampling switch 124 has been opened.
a-c illustrate a representative timing diagram in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The time bases of
The vertical axis 316 of
The saturating switch 132 is then opened and the sampling switch 124 is closed at the beginning of time period t2. At this point, the auxiliary current Iaux stops flowing, and the current, Is, through the secondary winding 128 takes over. The voltage, Vt, across the secondary winding is given by:
Vt=Vdc−Is*Rs,
where Vdc is the voltage of the power source 110, and Rs is the value of the sense resistor 134, depicted in
Is=(Imag+Ip*Np)/Ns.
Here, Imag is the magnetizing current induced by the magnetic core 112, Ip is the primary current 108, Np is the number of turns of the primary winding 126, and Ns is the number of turns of the secondary winding 128. It should be noted that the secondary current depends neither on the auxiliary current nor on the on-state resistance of the sampling switch 124. The magnetizing current, Imag, can be written as:
Imag=Im*Hc,
where Im is the magnetic path length determined by the shape of the transformer core and Hc is the coercive force, a property of the magnetic material comprising the core. By selecting a core that exhibits low coercive force, a condition is achieved in which:
Ip*Np>>Im*Hc,
thus allowing the influence of the magnetizing current to be neglected. This is desirable because the value of the coercive force Hc is subject to device-to-device variation and exhibits a distinct temperature dependence. In this case, the secondary current Is is simply equal to the primary current Ip multiplied by the turns ratio Np/Ns. Magnetic cores based on amorphous or nanocrystalline alloys are particularly suitable because they have a low coercive force Hc and exhibit a low temperature drift. Permalloys and supermalloys do not offer high temperature stability but provide fairly low coercive force together with a high machinability that makes them suitable for use with the present invention. Ferrite materials provide neither low coercive force nor low temperature drift, but they do exhibit low cost and high machinability that makes them attractive for low-cost, low-precision current sensing applications. Thus cores made of ferrite materials also fall within the scope and spirit of the present invention. In high-precision applications in which the magnetizing current cannot be neglected, temperature and offset compensation can be implemented by any number of schemes well known to those skilled in the art.
The cross sectional area of the magnetic core 112 has no bearing on the measurement accuracy. In fact, a smaller cross sectional area, Ac, is preferred because the time to force the core into saturation is decreased because fewer volt-seconds must be applied across the secondary winding. Referring to
Thus, reducing the cross sectional area of the magnetic core 112 not only decreases the size and cost of the current sensor but also increases its sampling rate. Alternatively, if the sampling rate is kept constant, the smaller cross sectional area reduces power consumption. Moreover, core losses are decreased because the total core volume is reduced.
After the ton time period 334 has elapsed, the sense voltage 114 is sampled at the sampling instant 320. In one embodiment of the current sensor in accordance with the present invention, the sense voltage 114 is sampled using an analog-to-digital converter 104 with a sample-and-hold front-end circuit. This digital signal may then be processed by the control circuit 102 or alternatively may be converted back to an analog output 136 using an optional digital-to-analog converter 106 (see
At the end of time period t2, the sampling switch 124 is opened, and the current through the secondary winding 128 freewheels through the diodes 118 and 120. The voltage Vt across the secondary winding goes negative, as illustrated by trace 332 of
The length of time interval t1 is set such that even at zero primary current, the circuit is able to bring the magnetic core 112 into saturation. The minimum interval for t2, on the other hand, is set by the time ton required to reach the set point 204 as illustrated in
The embodiment of the present invention illustrated in
It is also possible to use a current source with high output impedance instead of resistor R1 to set the auxiliary current. In this case, the gain would again be dependent only on the turns ratio and the sense resistor Rs 134 because R1 becomes very large.
Vt=Vdc−Vd1−Vd2,
where Vt 816 is the voltage across the secondary winding 840, Vdc is the voltage of the power supply 802, Vd1 is the voltage drop across diode 818, and Vd2 is the voltage drop across diode 820.
An advantage of this embodiment is that the power loss is reduced by up to 50% over the embodiment shown in
One drawback of this seventh embodiment of the present invention is that it is not possible to measure bidirectional currents by maintaining both the saturating and sampling switches closed as described previously. This is because the auxiliary current cannot be provided during the sampling phase because it shares the same winding with the sampling circuit.
Having thus described several embodiments of an isolated current sensor, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that certain advantages of the invention have been achieved. It should also be appreciated that various modifications, adaptations, and alternative embodiments thereof may be made within the scope and spirit of the present invention. The invention is further defined by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119(e), of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/983,884, filed Oct. 30, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3660672 | Berger et al. | May 1972 | A |
4021729 | Hudson, Jr. | May 1977 | A |
4147171 | Greene et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4194147 | Payne et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4204249 | Dye et al. | May 1980 | A |
4328429 | Kublick et al. | May 1982 | A |
4335445 | Nercessian | Jun 1982 | A |
4350943 | Pritchard | Sep 1982 | A |
4451773 | Papathomas et al. | May 1984 | A |
4538073 | Freige et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4538101 | Shimpo et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4607330 | McMurray et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4616142 | Upadhyay et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4622627 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4630187 | Henze | Dec 1986 | A |
4654769 | Middlebrook | Mar 1987 | A |
4677566 | Whittaker et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4761725 | Henze | Aug 1988 | A |
4940930 | Detweiler | Jul 1990 | A |
4988942 | Ekstrand | Jan 1991 | A |
5004972 | Roth | Apr 1991 | A |
5053920 | Staffiere et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5073848 | Steigerwald et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5079498 | Cleasby et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5117430 | Berglund | May 1992 | A |
5168208 | Schultz et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5229699 | Chu et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5270904 | Gulczynski | Dec 1993 | A |
5272614 | Brunk et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5287055 | Cini et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5325062 | Bachand et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5349523 | Inou et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5377090 | Steigerwald | Dec 1994 | A |
5398029 | Toyama et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5426425 | Conrad et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5440520 | Schutz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5481140 | Maruyama et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489904 | Hadidi | Feb 1996 | A |
5508606 | Ryczek | Apr 1996 | A |
5532577 | Doluca | Jul 1996 | A |
5610826 | Whetsel | Mar 1997 | A |
5627460 | Bazinet et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631550 | Castro et al. | May 1997 | A |
5646509 | Berglund et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5675480 | Stanford | Oct 1997 | A |
5684686 | Reddy | Nov 1997 | A |
5727208 | Brown | Mar 1998 | A |
5752047 | Darty et al. | May 1998 | A |
5815018 | Soborski | Sep 1998 | A |
5847950 | Bhagwat | Dec 1998 | A |
5870296 | Schaffer | Feb 1999 | A |
5872984 | Berglund et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874912 | Hasegawn | Feb 1999 | A |
5883797 | Amaro et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889392 | Moore et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892933 | Voltz | Apr 1999 | A |
5905370 | Bryson | May 1999 | A |
5917719 | Hoffman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5929618 | Boylan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929620 | Dobkin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935252 | Berglund et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943227 | Bryson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946495 | Scholhamer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5990669 | Brown | Nov 1999 | A |
5994885 | Wilcox et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005377 | Chen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021059 | Kennedy | Feb 2000 | A |
6055163 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057607 | Rader, III et al. | May 2000 | A |
6079026 | Berglund et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6100676 | Burstein et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111396 | Lin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115441 | Douglass et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121760 | Marshall et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6136143 | Winter et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137280 | Ackermann | Oct 2000 | A |
6150803 | Varga | Nov 2000 | A |
6157093 | Giannopoulos et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6157182 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160697 | Edel | Dec 2000 | A |
6163143 | Shimamori | Dec 2000 | A |
6163178 | Stark et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170062 | Henrie | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177787 | Hobrecht | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181029 | Berglund et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191566 | Petricek et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194856 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194883 | Shimamori | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198261 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199130 | Berglund et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208127 | Doluca | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211579 | Blair | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246219 | Lynch et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249111 | Nguyen | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262900 | Suntio | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288595 | Hirakata et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291975 | Snodgrass | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294954 | Melanson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304066 | Wilcox et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304823 | Smit et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320768 | Pham et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351108 | Burnstein et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355990 | Mitchell | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366069 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370047 | Mallory | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373334 | Melanson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385024 | Olson | May 2002 | B1 |
6392577 | Swanson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396169 | Voegli | May 2002 | B1 |
6396250 | Bridge | May 2002 | B1 |
6400127 | Giannopoulos | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411071 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411072 | Feldman | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414864 | Hoshi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421259 | Brooks et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429630 | Pohlman et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6448745 | Killat | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448746 | Carlson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456044 | Darmawaskita | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465909 | Soo et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465993 | Clarkin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469478 | Curtin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469484 | L'Hermite et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6476589 | Umminger et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6556158 | Steensgaard-Madsen | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559684 | Goodfellow | May 2003 | B2 |
6563294 | Duffy et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6583608 | Zafarana et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6590369 | Burstein et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6608402 | Soo et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614612 | Menegoli et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621259 | Jones et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6651178 | Voegeli et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665525 | Dent et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683494 | Stanley | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686831 | Cook | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6693811 | Bowman et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6717389 | Johnson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731023 | Rothleitner et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744243 | Daniels et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6771052 | Ostojic | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778414 | Chang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788033 | Vinciarelli | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6788035 | Bassett et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791298 | Shenai et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791302 | Tang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791368 | Tzeng et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795009 | Duffy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801027 | Hann et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807070 | Ribarich | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6816758 | Maxwell, Jr. et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819537 | Pohlman et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825644 | Kernahan et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828765 | Schultz et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6829547 | Law et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6833691 | Chapuis | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850046 | Chapuis | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850049 | Kono | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850426 | Kojori et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853169 | Burstein et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853174 | Inn | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6888339 | Travaglini et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6903949 | Ribarich | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911808 | Shimamori | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6915440 | Berglund et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917186 | Klippel et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928560 | Fell, III et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6933709 | Chapuis | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933711 | Sutardja et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936999 | Chapuis | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947273 | Bassett et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949916 | Chapuis | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963190 | Asanuma et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965220 | Kernahan et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965502 | Duffy et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975494 | Tang et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6975785 | Ghandi | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6977492 | Sutardja et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7000125 | Chapuis et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7000315 | Chua et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002265 | Potega | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007176 | Goodfellow et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7023192 | Sutardja et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7023672 | Goodfellow et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047110 | Lenz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7049798 | Chapuis et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7068021 | Chapuis | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080265 | Thaker et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7141956 | Chapuis | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7190754 | Chang et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7266709 | Chapuis et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7301313 | Hart et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7315157 | Chapuis | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7315160 | Fosler | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7359643 | Aronson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7394445 | Chapuis et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7584371 | Zhang | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20010052862 | Roelofs | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020070718 | Rose | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073347 | Zafarana et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075710 | Lin | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020104031 | Tomlinson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020105227 | Nerone et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020144163 | Goodfellow et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030006650 | Tang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030067404 | Ruha et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030122429 | Zhang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137912 | Ogura | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142513 | Vinciarelli | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030201761 | Harris | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040080044 | Moriyama et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093533 | Chapuis et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040123164 | Chapuis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123167 | Chapuis | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040174147 | Vinciarelli | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040178780 | Chapuis | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189271 | Hanson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201279 | Templeton | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225811 | Fosler | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246754 | Chapuis | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050093594 | Kim et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117376 | Wilson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146312 | Kenny et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050200344 | Chapuis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050289373 | Chapuis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060022656 | Leung et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060085656 | Betts-LaCroix | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060149396 | Templeton | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174145 | Chapuis et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060244570 | Leung et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060250120 | King | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070114985 | Latham et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080074373 | Chapuis et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080238208 | Potter et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2521825 | Nov 2002 | CN |
0255258 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0315366 | May 1989 | EP |
0401562 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0660487 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0875994 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0877468 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0997825 | May 2000 | EP |
2377094 | Dec 2002 | GB |
60-244111 | Dec 1985 | JP |
1185329 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-289754 | Oct 1999 | JP |
200284495 | Aug 2002 | KR |
1814177 | May 1993 | RU |
1359874 | Dec 1985 | SU |
WO9319415 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO0122585 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0231943 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0231951 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0250690 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO02063688 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO03030369 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090108833 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60983884 | Oct 2007 | US |