The invention relates to an item of footwear, in particular a motorcycle boot.
It is particularly suitable for motor sports and, more particularly, off-road motorcycle sports where the feet of the user are very exposed. However, it can also be found to be advantageous for road racing or mountain biking in particular.
Motocross boots which have a leather upper onto which plastics reinforcements are fixed are already known. The reinforcements provide protection, whilst the leather brings about the connection between the reinforcements and allows a degree of flexibility. Boots of this type are hardly satisfactory since the protection is limited.
The object of the invention is to provide protection for the feet of a user without depriving him of the sensations necessary for participation in his activity. To this end, according to the invention, the item of footwear comprises a rigid shell which is produced from a first material and which defines a body which is intended to surround the foot of a user, the body has a lower portion which forms a sole, an upper portion which forms a vamp, an inner lateral portion and an outer lateral portion, said lateral portions connecting the lower portion and the upper portion, and these four portions extend in an extension direction between a first zone which forms a heel and a second zone which forms a tip, said item has an opening defined in only one of the said four portions of the body, said opening extending through the rigid shell and being closed by means of a flexible pad which is produced from a second material, said second material being more flexible than the first.
In this manner, the rigid shell effectively protects the foot of the user against impacts. The localized opening through the shell allows the user to feel, via the flexible pad, the contact of the item of footwear with an external element, such as a gear lever or a motorcycle footbrake. The item of footwear advantageously comprises more than one opening which extends through the shell, but each of them is included in a single portion of the body so as not to compromise the rigidity of the shell and the protection of the user.
The term flexible must be understood in the sense of having lower Shore hardness.
Advantageously, according to the invention, the opening is provided with spacing from the ends of the body in the extension direction.
Since the end portions are most exposed to risk of impacts, it is preferable not to provide any opening in the shell at that location.
According to another advantageous feature of the invention, the opening is provided in a zone of the lower portion which serves to support the sole of the foot of the user.
Since that region of the sole of the foot is very sensitive, this solution is particularly suitable for sensing elements which are located below the foot.
Additionally, the invention proposes that the opening extends transversely to the extension direction over less than half the width of the item of footwear.
The opening which is provided through the shell thus hardly reduces the protection of the foot and does not inconvenience the user when walking.
Furthermore, according to the invention, the pad extends in a recessed manner relative to the rigid shell.
There is thus less risk of the pad becoming damaged when the user walks on the ground.
On the other hand, the invention proposes that an opening is provided in the upper portion so that the user can feel the contact with an element which is located above his foot.
The invention will be appreciated even more clearly from the following description, given with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
The body 4 has an inner face and an outer face. It is substantially constituted by a rigid shell 5 which extends in an extension direction 6 between a rear zone 8 which forms a heel and a front zone 10 which forms a tip. It comprises a lower portion which forms a sole 20, an upper portion which forms a vamp 22, an inner lateral portion 21 and an outer lateral portion 23 which connect the lower portion 20 and the upper portion 22.
Openings 16, 18 are provided over the entire thickness of the shell 5 in order to allow the user to have tactile sensations. Each of said openings 16, 18 is included in only one of the four portions, the lower portion 20, upper portion 22, and lateral portions 21, 23, in order to allow the body to maintain its rigidity and to provide effective protection for the foot of the user. These openings 16, 18 are provided in the lower portion 20 which forms a sole and in the upper portion 22 which forms a vamp, respectively. They are closed by means of a lower flexible pad 12 and an upper flexible pad 14 which extend inside said openings and which are defined in the immediate proximity of said openings. Said openings 16, 18 are further produced substantially with spacing from the front end 24 and rear end 26 of the body 4 in the direction of extension 6.
The lower opening 16 is produced in the sole 20 in the zone of the tip 10 and, more precisely, in a zone which is intended to receive the sole of the foot of the user. It extends transversely to the extension direction 6 from the inner face 4a over a width which is slightly less than half the width of the boot at this location.
The flexible pad 12 has a slight recess 28 relative to the general surface of the sole 20.
The upper opening 18 is produced in the zone of the tip 10 and, more precisely, in the vamp 22, substantially at the centre thereof in the longitudinal direction 6.
In order to retain the flexible pads 12, 14 more effectively inside the openings 16, 18, provision may be made for the flexible pads to further extend slightly outside the openings 16, 18 in the immediate vicinity of the said openings, which would further prevent premature wear at this location of the inner lining (not shown) which is intended to be introduced inside the body 4 in order to receive the foot of the user in a tight manner therein.
The pad is advantageously produced from leather or from foam based on an elastomer material. The hardness thereof is advantageously between 60 and 80 Shore, whilst the hardness of the rigid shell 4 is advantageously between 80 and 120 Shore. Furthermore, the Shore hardness rating of the rigid shell 4 is advantageously at least 20%, preferably at least 30%, greater than the Shore hardness rating of the pad 12.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
02 07634 | Jun 2002 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR03/01837 | 6/17/2003 | WO | 00 | 12/29/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO04/000056 | 12/31/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2292556 | Whitman | Aug 1942 | A |
3363342 | Stohr | Jan 1968 | A |
3419974 | Lange | Jan 1969 | A |
4062133 | McGee et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4505056 | Beneteau | Mar 1985 | A |
4640027 | Berlese | Feb 1987 | A |
4882858 | Signori | Nov 1989 | A |
5086575 | Bonaventure | Feb 1992 | A |
5325611 | Dyer et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5681649 | Mashita et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
6112435 | Collavo | Sep 2000 | A |
6671981 | Brooks | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6826853 | Zanatta | Dec 2004 | B1 |
7000334 | Gillespie | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7124519 | Issler | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7257908 | Valat et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20020004997 | Quagliotto et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020112374 | Gillespie | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20050150134 | Issler | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050246923 | Bergamin | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060130364 | Greene et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 931 468 | Jul 1999 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060101672 A1 | May 2006 | US |