The disclosure relates generally to a device for protecting an item during shipping and installation and a method for using the device the item and in particular to a device for protecting a window or any cornered unit during shipping, movement or installation.
When a new building is built, whether residential or commercial, the building typically has one or more windows that are placed into the walls of the building. These new windows are manufactured by various window unit manufacturers and shipped to the construction site for installation. Each window unit includes a glass or plexiglass that forms the panes of the window and a frame of the window pre-assembled with various materials to include wood, vinyl, plastic, metal or other composites. During the shipping of the window units to the constructions site and handling of the window units at the constructions site (or at a shipping location), it is very possible for the window units to become damaged rendering them unusable. This damages of the window units is problematic for the general contractor at the construction site since another window units must be ordered and delivered and also problematic for the window manufacturer who may need to replace the window at no cost. In addition to new constructions projects, the same issue with damaged window units exists with replacement window units in which a person, such as a general contractor, is replacing current window units in a building with replacement window units.
In both cases, it is desirable to be able to protect the window unit during shipping and installation to reduce the damage. Currently, there are a number of products on the market that protect the window unit during shipping and installation. These products are generally comprised of scrap wood blocks, cardboard, Styrofoam, or plastic blocks that attach to the sides of a window unit hoping to prevent damage to the window unit during shipping and installation. The problems with these existing blocks are: 1) the blocks do not adequately protect the corner of the window unit; 2) different types of blocks may be required for a corner, bottom or a side of the window unit, 3) the material degrades during transportation, 4) the material and cost to apply it are cost-prohibitive and 5) the blocks or material may be knocked off of the window unit during shipping or installation resulting in a greater possibility of damage to the window unit. Thus, it is desirable to provide a window unit protection device and method for use that overcomes the above problems and limitations of the conventional window protection blocks and it is to this end that the disclosure is directed.
The disclosure is particularly applicable to a window unit protection device and method for use and it is in this context that the disclosure will be described. It will be appreciated, however, that the device may be used for both new window units and replacement window units in which the window unit has one or more panes of glass or other material, a frame around the panes and some mechanism by which the window unit may be secured to a new building or an existing building. Furthermore, the window unit protection device may have a slightly different configuration for each different window unit manufacturer since the window unit made by each window unit manufacturer may have slightly different dimensions, angles (i.e. square, hexagon, etc.), features, etc. and the window unit protection device may be easily modified to accommodate the different window units for the different window unit manufacturers. Furthermore, the device may be easily modified so that the protection device may be used to protect other items during shipping, installation or movement of the item. For example, the protection device may be modified for use with a consumer or commercial appliance device wherein it is being moved and/or protected from one location to another (e.g., stove, refrigerator, dishwasher, crate, box, furniture, etc.), a motor assembly or any other item in which it is desirable to be able to protect the item during the shipping, movement or installation of the item.
To protect a corner region, the first and second portions 12, 14 of the item protection device 10 may be folded towards each other at a prescribed angle of 0-180 degrees depending on the contour of the product to protect a corner of an item such as a window unit. Alternatively, the item protection device 10 may remain flat and may be used to protect a flat surface of the item so that the item protection device 10 may be used for both flat surfaces and corners of the item being protected. Since the item protection device 10 may be manufactured in a flat configuration as shown in
Each portion 12, 14 may have a first and/or a second tower portions 18, 20 adjacent each other with a valley region 19 in between the tower portions 18, 20. In the embodiment in which the item protection device 10 is being used to protect a window unit (as shown in
In one embodiment, a top surface 26 of the tower portions 18 and/or 20 on the second portion 14 and/or 12 may have an adhesive material that may be adhered to the frame of the item when the item protection device 10 is installed. In one embodiment, the adhesive material may be well known double sided sticky tape or glue that both adheres to the top surface 26 of the tower portion(s) and the frame of the item being protected when installed.
The item protection device 10 may further include a locking mechanism that locks the first and second portions 12, 14 together when the first and second portions 12, 14 are folded towards each other. The locking mechanism may further comprise a male portion 22 on each tower portion 18, 20 of the first portion 12 and a female portion 24 on each tower portion 18, 20 of the second portion 12 and lock together when the first and second portions 12,14 are folded towards each other using the hinge portion 16 as described in more detail below.
The item protection device 10 may further comprise a curved ramp region 32 at the corner of each of the first and second portions 12, 14. When the first and second portions 12,14 are folded together, such as to protect the corner of a window unit for example, the ramp regions 32 form a curved corner surface that slides more easily over rough surfaces. Furthermore, each end of each of the first and second portions 12, 14 distal from the hinge 16 may also have a ramp region 32 that slides more easily over rough surfaces.
In one embodiment shown in
In operation, when the male portion 22 and its hook end 80 go into the female portion 24, the ridge portions 82 engages the hook ends 80 to lock the two portions 12, 14 of the item protection device 10 together. In some embodiments, each hook end 80 may be slightly bent/angled (inwards or outwards depending on the embodiment) to create tension that assists the engagement of the hook end 80 by the ridge feature 82. In different embodiments for different items being protected, the height of the hook end 80 relative to a thickness of the overall item protection device 10 and the ridge feature 82 may be adjusted so as to engage tightly to maintain the desired angle of the item protection device 10 when locked. In the example shown in
The foregoing description, for purpose of explanation, has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, the illustrative discussions above are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the disclosure and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the disclosure and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Although certain presently preferred implementations of the invention have been specifically described herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains that variations and modifications of the various implementations shown and described herein may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only to the extent required by the applicable rules of law.
While the foregoing has been with reference to a particular embodiment of the disclosure, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes in this embodiment may be made without departing from the principles and spirit of the disclosure, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/591,616 filed Nov. 28, 2017 and entitled “Item Protection Device and Method for Use”, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1316467 | Tollis | Sep 1919 | A |
1376686 | Fleckner | May 1921 | A |
1667279 | Allen | Apr 1928 | A |
1886531 | Dalchow | Nov 1932 | A |
2462442 | Wallace | Feb 1949 | A |
2489029 | Guerrant | Nov 1949 | A |
2742146 | Lester, Jr. | Apr 1956 | A |
2844913 | Brill, Jr. | Jul 1958 | A |
2887219 | Lester, Jr. | May 1959 | A |
2903823 | Westford | Sep 1959 | A |
2929495 | Simonsen | Mar 1960 | A |
2931603 | Johnston et al. | Apr 1960 | A |
3017022 | Amundson | Jan 1962 | A |
3111724 | Piekarski | Nov 1963 | A |
3205982 | Chimienti | Sep 1965 | A |
3301820 | Haendiges | Jan 1967 | A |
3593458 | Wahlfeld et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3618261 | Torbetter | Nov 1971 | A |
3668906 | Josephart | Jun 1972 | A |
3739525 | Rybak | Jun 1973 | A |
3800365 | Bruggart | Apr 1974 | A |
3807622 | Belcher | Apr 1974 | A |
3868054 | Congleton | Feb 1975 | A |
3893647 | Kennedy | Jul 1975 | A |
3983602 | Barry | Oct 1976 | A |
3987956 | Congleton | Oct 1976 | A |
3992810 | Kimball | Nov 1976 | A |
4024604 | Klimek et al. | May 1977 | A |
4050187 | Geiger et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4099299 | Bruggert et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4176494 | Boucher et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4201013 | Robbins | May 1980 | A |
4483101 | Berzina | Nov 1984 | A |
4518279 | Suttles | May 1985 | A |
4615140 | Frano | Oct 1986 | A |
4620389 | Coulson | Nov 1986 | A |
4635886 | Santucci et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4636105 | Johansson | Jan 1987 | A |
4709889 | Erickson | Dec 1987 | A |
4718195 | Ortega | Jan 1988 | A |
D307078 | Guillement | Apr 1990 | S |
4922654 | Hawke | May 1990 | A |
4942704 | King | Jul 1990 | A |
D319007 | Rogers et al. | Aug 1991 | S |
5052086 | Nasuno | Oct 1991 | A |
5054613 | Johansson | Oct 1991 | A |
5056198 | Viglione | Oct 1991 | A |
5159782 | Sales | Nov 1992 | A |
5167091 | Schroeder | Dec 1992 | A |
5209017 | Ridge | May 1993 | A |
5210973 | Kratky et al. | May 1993 | A |
5255727 | Saruwatari et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5312078 | Marsh | May 1994 | A |
5358423 | Burkhard et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5365697 | Vanderpan | Nov 1994 | A |
5463189 | Deneke et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5473839 | Stidham | Dec 1995 | A |
5474268 | Yu | Dec 1995 | A |
5542209 | Sheu | Aug 1996 | A |
5562315 | Sales | Oct 1996 | A |
5565254 | Norvell | Oct 1996 | A |
5603403 | Sather | Feb 1997 | A |
5617672 | Garrett | Apr 1997 | A |
5635697 | Shellhammer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5655332 | Papadopoulos | Aug 1997 | A |
5722203 | Staples et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5787639 | Lamore | Aug 1998 | A |
5806683 | Gale | Sep 1998 | A |
5819374 | Chiles et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5857429 | Hostetler | Jan 1999 | A |
5863471 | Stanek | Jan 1999 | A |
5924259 | Marousek | Jul 1999 | A |
6029410 | Westberg, II et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
D427894 | Benz et al. | Jul 2000 | S |
6142304 | Moren | Nov 2000 | A |
6170198 | Staples et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6276526 | Miller et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301828 | Vanderpan | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343772 | Oi | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357181 | Triemstra | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357200 | Vanderpan | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378175 | Vanderpan | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6443401 | Vanderpan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470637 | Gratz | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6488247 | Gonzalez | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6532704 | Hart | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6725604 | Vanderpan | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6840381 | Stephens | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6968954 | Hsieh | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7213371 | Vanderpan et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7743922 | Pitt | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8662307 | Pitt | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20010042813 | Taylor | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20040060241 | Staples et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060243636 | Robichaud | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20110233099 | Pitt | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
568764 | Jan 1959 | CA |
101266 | Oct 1897 | DE |
392148 | Mar 1924 | DE |
823064 | Nov 1951 | DE |
2232988 | Jan 1975 | FR |
2247157 | May 1975 | FR |
H0667786 | Mar 1994 | JP |
1464965 | Mar 1989 | SU |
WO9925172 | May 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62591616 | Nov 2017 | US |