The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for determining if an item of media is valid or invalid. In particular, but not exclusively, the present invention relates to a method for determining if an item of media such as a currency note or financial check is invalid in the sense that a currency note is a forgery or a value associated with the item has previously been exhausted. For example, the sum indicated on a check is a value that is exhausted when the check is presented and cashed at a financial institution.
There are many known items of media today which are associated with a value such as a pre-payment value or face value. Such items of media such as prepayment cards, scratch cards, currency checks, currency notes, vouchers or the like, are typically presented by a user at a redeeming node whereby goods or services or money or credit are exchanged for the item. Often, the fact that the value in the item has been exhausted by such an exchange must be identified. This can be achieved by an authorized user at the redemption node keeping possession of the presented item, but on occasion this can be inconvenient. The item must often therefore be marked in some way so that, if returned to an initial user, that user cannot subsequently re-present the item to attempt to receive the value associated with the item again.
For example, today, many item processing devices, including check processing modules in an automated teller machine (ATM), usually offer an option to endorse a check on the rear during an acceptance process. Some offer the ability to put a stamp on the front or rear of the check (endorsement, bank stamp or void stamp). The endorsement mechanisms used often take the form of printing via a printer or roll-on stamper in the ATM with some form of inking method, such as a rubber ink pad stamper, thermal print, or inkjet printer, or the like.
These printers have issues with ink running out, ink drying out, misfires, printer hardware failures and faint and/or smeared print. Furthermore, the orientation of the check which is presented must be fixed so that the printer prints on a correct side of the check and fully prints a pre-determined message. Customers have long accepted these limitations as a printer was the only method available to get required information onto the face or rear of the check to meet paper-based check processing rules. Vendors have had to provide one or multiple printers in check processing devices along with their associated high cost and failure rates.
With the advent of Check 21 in the US, it is now possible to fully process a check based upon an image of a check captured at an ATM, branch or other point of first presentation. A remaining requirement for marking the physical check has been to render it non-negotiable after initial presentation in order to prevent the check being retrieved and re-presented for deposit or cashing a second or more time. This has been prone to the problems mentioned above.
A still further problem occurs when an automated process is used to handle deposited items and allocated a value to a user or user account if the deposited item is valid. Printed endorsements can be overlooked and can be tampered with to fool a machine into allowing a value associated with re-presented items to be re-used.
It is an aim of the present invention to at least partly mitigate the above-mentioned problems.
It is an aim of certain embodiments of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for determining if an item of media is invalid or valid.
It is an aim of certain embodiments of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for determining if a financial check has been previously presented. If not so presented, then processed and thereafter marked invalid in some way to prevent a value of the check being re-applied during subsequent re-presentation.
It is an aim of certain embodiments of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for determining if an item of media is invalid, which can be automated and executed with a high degree of certainty.
It is an aim of certain embodiments of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for determining if a currency check is valid for subsequent negotiation and thereafter executing a financial transaction and marking the check in such a way that it will subsequently no longer be able to be re-presented as part of a negotiation.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for determining if an item of media is invalid, comprising:
Aptly, the step of determining if the location of said regions satisfies a pre-determined condition comprises determining if the location of said regions are arranged substantially in a pre-determined pattern.
Aptly, the method further comprises determining if said regions are arranged in a cancellation pattern corresponding to a pattern of through holes generated in an item if a resource value of the item is used up.
Aptly, the step of determining a plurality of regions of the image that satisfy a pre-determined condition comprises determining regions of the image in which a detected sensor value is at least a pre-determined threshold value.
Aptly, the step of providing an ultrasound image comprises generating ultrasound waves proximate to the item proximate to the item of media via at least one ultrasound transducer element;
Aptly, the at least one ultrasound sensor comprises an array of ultrasound sensors and the method further comprises, via the array of sensors, determining if at least one further parameter associated with the item of media satisfies an associated pre-determined condition.
Aptly, the item of media is a check and the method is carried out in a check depositing Automated Teller Machine (ATM).
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of operating an image-based check depositing terminal, comprising:
Aptly, the method further comprises, if the check has not been pre-presented, generating a plurality of through holes in a cancellation pattern in the check.
Aptly, the method further comprises, if the check has not been pre-presented, transmitting an image associated with the check from the terminal to an institution.
According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided apparatus for determining if an item of media is invalid, comprising:
Aptly, the apparatus further includes a photographic imaging camera for capturing a photographic image of at least one side of the item of media.
Aptly, the apparatus includes a perforator for punching a plurality of through holes in the item of media in a pre-determined cancellation pattern.
Aptly, the apparatus further comprises an array of ultrasonic sensors arranged to provide an ultrasonic image of an item of media located at a pre-determined validation location in a terminal.
Aptly, the perforator comprises at least one rotatable roller element and a plurality of pin elements extending radially outwardly from a substantially cylindrical outer surface of the roller element.
Aptly, the perforator further comprises a resilient roller element having an outer, substantially cylindrical abutment surface urged against the pin elements.
Aptly, the pre-determined cancellation pattern comprises a pattern of holes arranged as letters that spell a word visible to a human user.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of determining if a check is invalid, comprising:
According to a fifth aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for ascertaining if an item of media is invalid, comprising:
The method may include capturing an ultrasound image of an item of media prior to the step of receiving an ultrasound image of the item of media.
The rejection criterion may comprise (i) a plurality of perforations in the media item, (ii) each perforation exceeding a specified size, and (iii) the combination of the perforations matching a specified shape.
Certain embodiments of the present invention provide the advantage that a method for determining if an item of media is valid or invalid can be provided via an automated system which is not prone to error.
Certain embodiments of the present invention provide the advantage that items of media such as currency notes, checks, prepayment cards, vouchers or the like may be marked as invalid subsequent to a value associated with those items being exhausted. The way the items are marked does not require ink and therefore the machines used to process the items do not require an ink source. Therefore, there is no ongoing cost or maintenance associated with replacing ink supplies such as ribbons or print heads. Also, reliable, observable results are achieved which are not subject to ink smearing, ink drying out, ribbons going faint etc. There is thus a lower failure rate than most printing methods as there is no print carriage, print head or similar device required in a terminal carrying out the automated negotiations.
Certain embodiments of the present invention are able to determine if an item is valid or invalid and/or optionally, subsequently mark an item as invalid in a way that is effective regardless of an orientation of the item presented at a terminal.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described hereinafter, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
In the drawings like reference numerals refer to like parts.
As illustrated in
The fascia 101 provides a user interface for allowing an ATM customer to execute a transaction. The fascia 101 includes an encrypting keyboard 120 for allowing an ATM customer to enter transaction details. A display 130 is provided for presenting screens to an ATM customer. A fingerprint reader 140 is provided for reading a fingerprint of an ATM customer to identify the ATM customer.
Within the chassis of the ATM it will be understood that items of media must be transported from time to time from one location to another. The pathway taken by any particular item of media is dependent upon an operation being carried out at the ATM and may also be dependent upon other factors such as whether a user of the ATM is authorized and/or whether an item of media being transported satisfies certain pre-determined criteria.
The nip rollers co-operate and are rotated in opposite directions with respect to each other to either draw deposited checks inwards (and urge those checks towards the right hand side in
Items of media from the escrow 240 can selectively be removed from a storage drum and re-processed after temporary storage. This results in items of media moving from the escrow 240 towards the left hand side of
Certain embodiments of the present invention thus provide several advantages over prior printing methods used to void a currency note or check or other such item of media. The solution offered does not require ink and therefore there is little ongoing cost or maintenance associated with replacing ink supplies such as ribbons or print heads. Also, clearly observable results can be achieved which are not subject to ink smearing, ink drying out or ribbon going faint problems associated with prior known techniques. There is thus a lower failure rate than previous known printing and verification methods.
Certain embodiments of the present invention also provide an advantage in that they offer a lower cost solution to the determining and marking of valid or invalid items than most printing methods. This is because printing carriages, print heads and the like are not required in the terminals utilized to process the items of media. Also, many of the functioning parts needed for the present invention are typically already provided in many of the terminals already processing such items of media for other purposes.
Certain embodiments of the present invention thus help prevent re-presentment of a check for deposit or cashing. It would otherwise be very possible to overlook a printed endorsement on the back of a check and accept the check despite the fact that it had previously been presented. By contrast, punched holes in a check are very visible and therefore it is clear that the check is no longer negotiable. This can be more easily detected by human or automated means compared to prior known endorsement techniques.
Certain embodiments of the present invention also provide advantages over the prior known systems which operate to cancel an item of media by destroying that item. For example, in the past voiding/invalidating has been achieved by shredding techniques once accepted. Such techniques make it difficult to store the cancelled items at a terminal and require higher maintenance levels. By contrast, according to certain embodiments of the present invention the presented items of media remain primarily intact and legible and can thus subsequently be referred to if a transaction error occurs.
Throughout the description and claims of this specification, the words “comprise” and “contain” and variations of them mean “including but not limited to” and they are not intended to (and do not) exclude other moieties, additives, components, integers or steps. Throughout the description and claims of this specification, the singular encompasses the plural unless the context otherwise requires. In particular, where the indefinite article is used, the specification is to be understood as contemplating plurality as well as singularity, unless the context requires otherwise.
Features, integers, characteristics or groups described in conjunction with a particular aspect, embodiment or example of the invention are to be understood to be applicable to any other aspect, embodiment or example described herein unless incompatible therewith. All of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), and/or all of the steps of any method or process so disclosed, may be combined in any combination, except combinations where at least some of the features and/or steps are mutually exclusive. The invention is not restricted to any details of any foregoing embodiments. The invention extends to any novel one, or novel combination, of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), or to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the steps of any method or process so disclosed.
The reader's attention is directed to all papers and documents which are filed concurrently with or previous to this specification in connection with this application and which are open to public inspection with this specification, and the contents of all such papers and documents are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4780352 | Palumbo | Oct 1988 | A |
4984281 | Matsuhashi et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5039020 | Leuthold et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5225666 | Amarena et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5463922 | Mori | Nov 1995 | A |
5532464 | Josephson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5814389 | Giacometti | Sep 1998 | A |
6233340 | Sandru | May 2001 | B1 |
6774986 | Laskowski | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6819219 | Bolle et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7229012 | Enright et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7337955 | Block et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7404559 | Yoshimura et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7571796 | Stenzel et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7607528 | Derks et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7661617 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8256683 | Von Fellenberg et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8464587 | Domke et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8510062 | Domke et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8567777 | Syracuse et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8585050 | Syracuse et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8684262 | Eastman et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8688579 | Ethington | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8730529 | Link et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8763897 | Enright et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8833761 | Dukart et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20020156683 | Stoutenburg et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030099379 | Monk et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040150155 | Okitsu et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060000889 | Ma et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070138255 | Carreon et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090260440 | Pellaton | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090312957 | Domke et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100052237 | Herczeg | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100060881 | Kayani | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100243729 | Russell et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110206235 | Sullivan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110254219 | Helmlinger et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120019841 | Schaertel et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120048932 | Xiao | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120061901 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130020172 | Cha et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130026004 | Cha et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130049282 | Shin et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1087302 | Jun 1994 | CN |
1107774 | Sep 1995 | CN |
1636222 | Jul 2005 | CN |
1638975 | Jul 2005 | CN |
1729488 | Feb 2006 | CN |
1853202 | Oct 2006 | CN |
101490542 | Jul 2009 | CN |
102401815 | Apr 2012 | CN |
1102217 | May 2001 | EP |
1573433 | May 2003 | EP |
2428766 | Mar 2012 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Harrell; Local Government and Single Audits; (2006). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130336086 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |