The subject invention relates to an iterative approach to achieve angular ambiguity resolution.
A synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a radar that uses the motion of the antenna to improve spatial resolution. The distance that the SAR travels in the time it takes for reflections to return to the antenna based on transmitted pulses creates a synthetic antenna aperture that is larger than the actual antenna size. Increased antenna aperture improves image resolution of the two- or three-dimensional image obtained with the SAR. A beamforming antenna transmits the pulses at a selected angle. When the velocity at which the SAR is moving is known, the Doppler frequency of static objects determines their angle with respect to the direction of travel of the SAR, but Doppler SAR in two dimensions, azimuth and elevation, suffers from angular ambiguity. Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a SAR that achieves angular ambiguity resolution.
In one exemplary embodiment, a method of achieving angular ambiguity resolution in a two-dimensional Doppler synthetic aperture radar system includes transmitting pulses using a plurality of transmit elements during movement of a platform on which the system is mounted, receiving reflections from a target resulting from the pulses, and processing the reflections to determine a Doppler measurement, the processing including subtracting a component specific to the movement of the platform to isolate movement of the target in the Doppler measurement. Determining a target azimuth angle and a target elevation angle to the target is based on an iterative process that includes estimating the target elevation angle or the target azimuth angle and then determining the target azimuth angle or the target elevation angle, respectively, based on a beamforming matrix. The beamforming matrix indicates amplitude and phase at each azimuth angle and each elevation angle among a set of azimuth angles and a set of elevation angles.
In another exemplary embodiment, a system to achieve angular ambiguity resolution using includes a platform to move, a two-dimensional Doppler synthetic aperture radar mounted on the platform to transmit pulses and receive reflections resulting from the pulses, and a memory to store a beamforming matrix. The beamforming matrix indicates amplitude and phase at each azimuth angle and each elevation angle among a set of azimuth angles and a set of elevation angles. The system also includes a processor to obtain a Doppler measurement specific to a target and determine a target azimuth angle and a target elevation angle to the target based on an iterative process that includes estimating the target elevation angle or the target azimuth angle and then determining the target azimuth angle or the target elevation angle, respectively, based on the beamforming matrix.
The above features and advantages and other features and advantages are readily apparent from the following detailed description when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Other features, advantages and details appear, by way of example only, in the following detailed description of embodiments, the detailed description referring to the drawings in which:
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, its application or uses. It should be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features.
As previously noted, angular ambiguity in azimuth and elevation is an issue associated with Dopper SAR systems. While SAR was traditionally used in aircraft and spaceborne vehicles, it is increasing used in terrestrial vehicles such as automobiles, for example. As previously indicated, the moving platform on which the radar system is mounted forms a larger synthetic aperture with enhanced angle resolution as compared with the dimensions of the real antenna array. The narrow beam capability of a SAR radar system facilitates multi-target discrimination and imaging. While the synthetic array length increases linearly with the speed of the platform on which the radar system is mounted, the beam resolution or angular resolution decreases exponentially with platform speed.
One or more embodiments of the systems and methods detailed herein relate to iteratively resolving ambiguity in angular resolution of the two-dimensional Doppler SAR based on a beamforming matrix. The beamforming matrix is a data structure such as a table, for example, that indicates the response in phase and amplitude of the reflection coming from each direction of arrival at each array element. Beamforming alone represents an inefficient solution to angular resolution because its performance is determined solely by array aperture. However, according to one or more embodiments, an elevation estimate is refined using the beamforming matrix to determine both elevation and azimuth of the target.
vcosθ [FN. 1]
In FN. 1, v is the velocity of the platform on which the radar system is mounted, and θ is the look angle. As FN. 1 indicates, the look angle θ can be determined from the Doppler measurement in this case of a one-dimensional angle.
In the two-dimensional case of the SAR, the radar system measures the projection of the static target velocity relative to the platform. The resulting one dimensional projection vector of target velocity must be resolved in azimuth and elevation. That is, the Doppler measurement is a function of:
v cos (θ) cos (φ) [FN. 2]
In FN. 2, θ is the look angle in azimuth, and co is the look angle in elevation. While determining the one-dimensional look angle based on the Doppler measurement according to FN. 1 is straight-forward, resolving the ambiguity between the azimuth and elevation contributions of the look angle, according to FN. 2, is more challenging. Embodiments of the systems and methods detailed herein relate to iteratively resolving the angular ambiguity in a moving-platform based radar system that is a two-dimensional Doppler SAR.
As indicated, the transmissions by the radar system 120 have look angles from 0 to 180 degrees on each side of the automobile 205. A controller 210 can be coupled to the radar system. The controller 210 includes processing circuitry that may include an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), an electronic circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) and memory that executes one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or other suitable components that provide the described functionality. In addition to partially or fully processing the signals received by the radar system 120, the controller 210 can be involved in other systems of the automobile 205 such as the collision avoidance, automatic braking, and automated driving systems.
The radar system 120 includes known components such as a transmit portion, a receive portion and antennas that are either dedicated to transmission or reception or function in a transceiver configuration. The radar system 120 can be a multi-input multi-output (MIMO) radar with multiple transmit elements and multiple receive elements or, in an alternate embodiment, can have multiple transmit elements and a single receive element. Each receive element receives reflections resulting from transmission by every transmit element. The size of the beamforming matrix is a function of the field of view and resolution in azimuth and elevation. For example, if the MIMO radar array is such that the field of view in both azimuth and elevation is −10 degrees to 10 degrees with a 1 degree resolution, and there are 12 elements that receive reflections, then the beamforming matrix is a 441-by-12 array with complex values that indicate phase and amplitude. This is because there are 21 discrete angle values in each of azimuth and elevation (21*21=441). The beamforming matrix can be stored by the controller 210, for example.
At block 330, the azimuth angle (θ) is determined. To determine the azimuth angle, the beamforming matrix, which can be stored in a database 340, for example, is searched. As previously noted, the database 340 can be part of the controller 210. Specifically, the azimuth angle corresponding with the maximum amplitude in the beamforming matrix for the elevation angle (estimated at block 320) is found. Once the azimuth angle is determined, FN. 2 can be used to refine the elevation estimate (at block 320). As
The iterative process can stop based on different conditions that are checked at block 350. According to an exemplary embodiment, the check at block 350 can be a threshold change in angles between two consecutive iterations can be used as a condition to stop the iterations (e.g., angles did not change by more than 0.5 degrees from the last iteration). According to another embodiment, the iterations can continue until there is no improvement in the amplitude value associated with the latest elevation angle and azimuth angle. While the exemplary embodiment discussed for explanatory purposes relates to estimating an elevation angle (at block 320) and iteratively determining the azimuthal component, the azimuth angle can instead be estimated (at block 320), and the elevation angle can be determined (at block 330) based on the beamforming matrix. The angle determination that is based on the beamforming matrix (at block 330) can be more accurate than the estimate based on FN. 2 (at block 320). Thus, the specific embodiment that is used to determine elevation angle and azimuth angle can be selected based on which angle is deemed to be more critical.
The processes discussed with reference to
While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2577785 | Lyon | Dec 1951 | A |
2718355 | Hammond, Jr. | Sep 1955 | A |
3075190 | Laporte | Jan 1963 | A |
3438033 | Preston | Apr 1969 | A |
3513707 | Russell | May 1970 | A |
3903525 | Mullins | Sep 1975 | A |
3935572 | Broniwitz | Jan 1976 | A |
3952302 | Mullins | Apr 1976 | A |
4321601 | Richman | Mar 1982 | A |
4546354 | Boles | Oct 1985 | A |
5103233 | Gallagher | Apr 1992 | A |
5115243 | Perry | May 1992 | A |
5115244 | Freedman | May 1992 | A |
5128683 | Freedman | Jul 1992 | A |
5172118 | Peregrim | Dec 1992 | A |
5173706 | Urkowitz | Dec 1992 | A |
5245347 | Bonta | Sep 1993 | A |
5424742 | Long | Jun 1995 | A |
5430445 | Peregrim | Jul 1995 | A |
5774087 | Rose | Jun 1998 | A |
6404379 | Yu | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6628844 | Benitz | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6801156 | Wasiewicz | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7479920 | Niv | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7522097 | Wakeman | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7633429 | Liu | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7944390 | Krieger | May 2011 | B2 |
8299958 | Kemkemian | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8456349 | Piesinger | Jun 2013 | B1 |
20030048214 | Yu | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030174088 | Dizaji | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040178943 | Niv | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040178951 | Ponsford | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050184987 | Vincent | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050242985 | Ponsford | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20080117098 | Johnson | May 2008 | A1 |
20090109086 | Krieger | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110140952 | Kemkemian | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20130176161 | Derham | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20150369912 | Kishigami | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160025849 | Wang | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160139254 | Wittenberg | May 2016 | A1 |
20170098891 | Nishimoto | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180203108 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |