The present document relates to wireless communication, and more particularly, transmission and reception of multi-level constellation signals.
Due to an explosive growth in the number of wireless user devices and the amount of wireless data that these devices can generate or consume, current wireless communication networks are fast running out of bandwidth to accommodate such a high growth in data traffic and provide high quality of service to users.
Various efforts are underway in the telecommunication industry to come up with next generation of wireless technologies that can keep up with the demand on performance of wireless devices and networks.
This document discloses techniques for transmission and reception of signals with improved error-rate performance, using multi-level constellations symbols.
In one example aspect, a method of wireless signal transmission is disclosed. The method includes receiving information bits for transmission, segmenting the information bits into a stream of segments, applying a corresponding forward error correction (FEC) code to each of the stream of segments, combining the streams to generate a stream of symbols, processing the stream of symbols to generate a waveform, and transmitting the waveform over a communication medium.
In another example aspect, a wireless communication method, implemented at a receiver-side is disclosed. The method include performing channel equalization on the signal to generate a channel equalized signal, logically dividing the channel equalized signal into a first number of segments, wherein the number of segment is equal to a second number of segments used at a transmitter-side to generate the signal, demodulating and symbol de-mapping the channel equalization signal in successive steps such that each step operates to recover one or more bits of one of the number of the segments to generate a demodulated bitstream, processing the demodulated bitstream to generate information related to the bits of the signal, and providing a feedback signal to the channel equalization operation based on the processing of the demodulated bitstream. The order in which the successive steps are performed depends on a reliability of success of recovering the one or more bits in each of the successive steps.
In another example aspect, a wireless communication apparatus that includes a processor is disclosed. The apparatus is configured to implement one of the methods described herein.
These, and other, features are described in this document.
Drawings described herein are used to provide a further understanding and constitute a part of this application. Example embodiments and illustrations thereof are used to explain the technology rather than limiting its scope.
To make the purposes, technical solutions and advantages of this disclosure more apparent, various embodiments are described in detail below with reference to the drawings. Unless otherwise noted, embodiments and features in embodiments of the present document may be combined with each other.
Section headings are used in the present document, including the appendices, to improve readability of the description and do not in any way limit the discussion to the respective sections only.
A typical wireless signal transmission system usually may include a transmit chain 200, as shown in
In transmit chain 200, all the source bits have (almost) equal protection by the FEC code, but the coded bits, which are mapped into different positions in the constellation symbol's label, do not typically have equal protection. Some of the bits in the constellation label may be more reliable than other bits (have lower probability of error). For example, in some standard constellation mappings, such as Gray mapping, the Most-Significant-Bits (MSBs) are typically more reliable than the Least-Significant-Bits (LSBs).
Described herein are alternative method for data segmentation and encoding along with its matching iterative receiver, which is advantageous in terms of error-rate performance.
Multi-Level Data Segmentation and Encoding
In various embodiments, the number of levels may be smaller than log2 M and each FEC may be connected to more than one bit in the constellation label. For example, in constellation mappings (308) where the real part of the complex constellation is independent of the imaginary part, pairs of constellation bits (one mapped to the real and one mapped to the imaginary) may be encoded together.
To achieve the best error-rate performance, the different FEC code rates may be optimally selected along with the choice of the constellation mapping.
Iterative Equalization & Decoding of Multi-Level Encoded Symbols
In general, iterative receivers exchange extrinsic information between the equalizer and the FEC decoder to achieve close to optimal performance, as shown in
Compared to other techniques described next, the error-rate performance of the scheme 400 may be degraded. One reason for the degradation may be because of the mixture of bits with different level of reliability in every FEC codeword that is being decoded. The constellation bits with low reliability make it harder for the FEC decoder to converge to the correct codeword and therefore, the feedback to the equalizer has less information to improve the equalization.
When multi-level encoding is applied at the transmitter (e.g., as shown in
In some embodiments, the segmentation operation may comprise serial-to-parallel conversion of the information bits such that each segment has a size equal to the number of bits used to generate constellations of a downstream modulation scheme. For example, 3 bits per segment may be used for 8 QAM modulation.
In some embodiments, the number of bits per segment may be equal to the block size for the downstream forward error correction scheme used. For example, 40 or 80 bit segments may be used for FEC block. In general, FECs with different error protection may be used and thus each FEC block may have a same number of bit size on the output (so that the outputs of each FEC can be combined to form symbols) but may have a different number of input bits. For example, the bit-expansion due to a stronger FEC code may mean fewer input bits will produce the same number of output FEC bits. However, in some embodiments, some FEC modules may have same input and output bit sizes but may offer different degrees of error correction coding due to algorithmic differences in the error correction code used for implementing the FEC.
In some embodiments, the transmission signal generation operation 606 may include application of a symplectic transform such as the OTFS transform to the signal to transform a corresponding delay-Doppler domain signal to a signal that is used for transmission.
In another example aspect, a wireless communication method 700, implemented at a receiver-side is disclosed. The method 700 include performing channel equalization on the signal to generate a channel equalized signal (702), logically dividing the channel equalized signal into a first number of segments, wherein the number of segment is equal to a second number of segments used at a transmitter-side to generate the signal (704), demodulating and symbol de-mapping the channel equalization signal in successive steps such that each step operates to recover one or more bits of one of the number of the segments to generate a demodulated bitstream (706), processing the demodulated bitstream to generate information related to the bits from the signal (708), and providing a feedback signal to the channel equalization operation based on the processing of the demodulated bitstream (710). The order in which the successive steps are performed depends on a reliability of success of recovering the one bit in each of the successive steps.
For example, the processing 710 may include forward error correction decoding using a plurality of forward error correction codes, at least some of which have different block sizes. In some embodiments, the feedback provided in step 710 may be based on performing symbol mapping and orthogonal time frequency space transformation to generate a feedback signal. In some embodiments, the processing operation 710 may include deinterleaving each segment of the first number of segments, and forward error correction decoding using a plurality of forward error correction codes, at least some of which have different block sizes, outputs of the deinterleaving of the first number of segments.
Examples of Multi-Level Coding and Decoding Schemes
In some multi-level-coding schemes where different code rates are assigned to different bits in the constellation label, along with methods for obtaining the optimal rates. Decoder embodiments may start from the least reliable bits, decode them, remove them from the received signal and decode the next reliable bit up to the most reliable bit.
It will be appreciated that the disclosed techniques can be used to improve transmission/reception performance of wireless apparatus.
The disclosed and other embodiments, modules and the functional operations described in this document can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this document and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. The disclosed and other embodiments can be implemented as one or more computer program products, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a computer readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. The computer readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more them. The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them. A propagated signal is an artificially generated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, that is generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus.
A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a standalone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
The processes and logic flows described in this document can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto optical disks; and CD ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
While this patent document contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of an invention that is claimed or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this document in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or a variation of a sub-combination. Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results.
Only a few examples and implementations are disclosed. Variations, modifications, and enhancements to the described examples and implementations and other implementations can be made based on what is disclosed.
This patent document is a continuation-in-part of PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/046634, filed Aug. 11, 2017 which claims the benefits and priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/374,585, filed Aug. 12, 2016, and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/379,184, filed Aug. 24, 2016, all entitled “ITERATIVE MULTI-LEVEL EQUALIZATION AND DECODING.” The entire content of the before-mentioned patent applications is incorporated by reference as part of the disclosure of this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4754493 | Coates | Jun 1988 | A |
5083135 | Nagy et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5182642 | Gersdorff et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5623511 | Bar-David et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5831977 | Dent | Nov 1998 | A |
5872542 | Simons et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5956624 | Hunsinger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6212246 | Hendrickson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6275966 | Sitterley | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289063 | Duxbury | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6356555 | Rakib et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6388621 | Lynch | May 2002 | B1 |
6426983 | Rakib et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6498789 | Honda et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6584158 | Ito | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6608864 | Strait | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6631168 | Izumi | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6704366 | Combes et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6956814 | Campanella | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7010048 | Shattil | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7170951 | Perthold | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7327812 | Auer | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7392018 | Ebert et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7689049 | Monro | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7773685 | Tirkkonen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7864877 | Hottinen | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8229017 | Lee et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8259845 | Dent | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8401131 | Fety et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8547988 | Hadani et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8619892 | Vetter et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8717210 | Eldar et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8879378 | Rakib et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8892048 | Turner | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8976851 | Hadani et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9031141 | Hadani et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9071285 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9071286 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9083483 | Rakib et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9083595 | Rakib et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9130638 | Hadani et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9282528 | Hashimoto | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9294315 | Hadani et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9444514 | Hadani et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9548840 | Hadani et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9553984 | Krause et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9590779 | Hadani et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9634719 | Rakib et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9660851 | Hadani et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9668148 | Hadani et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9712354 | Hadani et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9729281 | Hadani et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20010031022 | Petrus et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010033614 | Hudson | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010046205 | Easton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020001308 | Heuer | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020034191 | Shattil | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020104058 | Rappaport | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020136276 | Franceschini | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020181388 | Jain et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020181390 | Mody et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020181607 | Izumi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194570 | Birru | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030073464 | Giannakis et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030185295 | Yousef | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030235147 | Walton et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040044715 | Aldroubi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040086027 | Shattil | May 2004 | A1 |
20040174812 | Murakami et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189581 | Sako et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040218523 | Varshney et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050157778 | Trachewsket et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050157820 | Wongwirawat et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050180517 | Abe | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050207334 | Hadad | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050251844 | Martone et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060008021 | Bonnet | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060039270 | Strohmer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070014272 | Palanki et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038691 | Candes et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070078661 | Sriram et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070104283 | Han et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110131 | Guess et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140320 | Banna | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070211952 | Faber et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070237181 | Cho et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253465 | Muharemovic et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070253504 | Hasegawa | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080043857 | Dias et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080117999 | Kadous et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080165873 | Ghosh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186843 | Ma et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080187062 | Pan et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080232504 | Ma et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080250294 | Ngo | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080310383 | Kowalski | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090080403 | Hamdi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092259 | Jot et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103593 | Bergamo | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122854 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090161804 | Chrabieh et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090204627 | Hadani | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222226 | Baraniuk et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090276680 | Chiu | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303961 | Popovic et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100001901 | Baraniuk et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100008432 | Kim et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100014558 | Nieto | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027608 | Priotti | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100080312 | Moffatt et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111138 | Hosur et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100142476 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100187914 | Rada et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100238787 | Guey | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254484 | Hamaguchi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277308 | Potkonjak | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303136 | Ashikhmin et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322349 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007789 | Garmany | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013505 | Dyson | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110096814 | Wu | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110532 | Svendsen | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116489 | Grandhi | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116516 | Hwang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126071 | Han et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131463 | Gunnam | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110216808 | Tong et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110286502 | Adachi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287778 | Levin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292971 | Hadani et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110293030 | Rakib et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110299379 | Sesia et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305267 | Rius et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120021769 | Lindoff et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120051457 | Ma et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120140716 | Baldemair et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170680 | Stern | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120170684 | Yim et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120201322 | Rakib et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120213098 | Sun | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120235795 | Liao et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120269201 | Atungsiri et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272117 | Stadelmeier et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120320994 | Loghin et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130021977 | Yang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130058390 | Haas et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077579 | Cho et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130083661 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130121497 | Smaragdis et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130130751 | Vummintala | May 2013 | A1 |
20130230010 | Kim et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130260787 | Hashimoto | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130279627 | Wu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130311848 | Purohit | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130315133 | Wang | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140143639 | Loghin et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140161154 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169385 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169406 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169433 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169436 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169437 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169441 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140247803 | Arambepola et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140348252 | Siohan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140364128 | Lee et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150117395 | Hadani et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150326273 | Rakib et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150327085 | Hadani et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150349995 | Zhang | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150382231 | Jabbar et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160043835 | Hadani et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160135132 | Donepudi et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160182269 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191217 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191280 | Hadani et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160254889 | Shattil | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160277225 | Frenne et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160309345 | Tehrani et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160380743 | Rakib | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381576 | Hadani et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170012749 | Rakib et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170012810 | Rakib et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170019238 | Sharma | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170019297 | Rakib | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170033899 | Rakib et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170040711 | Rakib et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170078054 | Hadani et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170099122 | Hadani et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170099607 | Hadani et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170149594 | Rakib | May 2017 | A1 |
20170149595 | Rakib et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170201354 | Hadani et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170207817 | Hadani et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170222700 | Hadani et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170230215 | Rakib et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170244524 | Hadani et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20190173617 | Kons | Jun 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1235720 | Nov 1999 | CN |
101682316 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101939935 | Jan 2011 | CN |
1432168 | Jun 2004 | EP |
2011127910 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2007004297 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2011137699 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011150315 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2013148546 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014004585 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2016014596 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016014598 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016176642 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2016183230 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2016183240 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2016209848 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2017003952 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2017011478 | Jan 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chilamkurti et al., Reliable Transmission Mechanism for safety-critical information in vehicular wireless networks, IEEE, vol. 2, pp. 514-517 (Year: 2010). |
Ishizaki et al., Forward link capacity evaluation for W-CDMA with amplitude limited and forward error correction, IEEE, vol. 1, Conference Paper, pp. 439-443. (Year: 2002). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/117,119, dated Aug. 5, 2013, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/117,119, dated Feb. 28, 2014, 13 pages. |
Banelli, P. et al., “Modulation Formats and Waveforms for 5G Networks: Who Will Be the Heir of OFDM?,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 81, pp. 80-93, Nov. 2014. |
El Hattachi, R. et al., “NGMN 5G Initiative White Paper,” NGMN Alliance, Feb. 17, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.ngmn.org/uploads/media/NGMN_5G_White_Paper_V1_0.pdf, 125 pages. |
Rusek, F. et al., “Scaling Up MIMO, Opportunities and Challenges with Very Large Arrays,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 40-60 (2013). |
Vodafone, “Cellular Internet of Things: Architectural Aspects,” RP-150869, 3GPP RAN#68, Malmo, Sweden (Jun. 9, 2015), 19 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 11787483.4, dated Sep. 9, 2014, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/038302, dated Nov. 15, 2011, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2011/038302, dated Dec. 4, 2012, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/117,124, dated Feb. 22, 2013, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/117,124, dated Aug. 8, 2013, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/605,957, dated Jun. 22, 2017, 6 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 13809004.8, dated Apr. 14, 2016, 8 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 13809004.8, dated Feb. 17, 2017, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,087, dated Feb. 25, 2015, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,087, dated Nov. 12, 2014, 14 pages. |
Gurevich, S. et al. “Group Representation Design of Digital Signals and Sequences,” S.W. Golomb et al. (eds.), Seta 2008, LNCS 5203, pp. 153-166, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (2008). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/047723, dated Oct. 29, 2013, 17 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/047723, dated Dec. 31, 2014, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,088, dated Feb. 18, 2015, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,088, dated Nov. 28, 2014, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,086, dated Dec. 26, 2014, 8 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,086, dated Mar. 19, 2015, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,086, dated Oct. 14, 2014, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,089, dated Dec. 24, 2014, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,089, dated Aug. 14, 2015, 7 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,091, dated Jun. 11, 2015, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,091, dated Apr. 24, 2015, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,091, dated Jan. 27, 2015, 15 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,092, dated Oct. 8, 2014, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,092, dated Oct. 24, 2014, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,095, dated Apr. 30, 2015, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,095, dated Nov. 4, 2015, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,095, dated Jun. 1, 2016, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/717,886, dated Apr. 19, 2016, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,377, dated Dec. 11, 2015, 12 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,377, dated Jul. 13, 2016, 17 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2013239970, dated Dec. 8, 2015, 3 pages. |
“AT&T Annual Report 2014,” Opening Our Network [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: Sep. 22, 2016. <URL: http://www.att.com/Investor/ATT_Annual/2014/att_introduces_new_concepts_for_telecom_network.html>, 5 pages. |
Catt, “UL ACK/NACK transmission methods for LTE-A,” 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #60bis, R1-102453, Beijing, China, Apr. 12-16, 2010, 8 pages. |
Toskala, A. et al., “Physical Layer,” Chapter 5 In: “LTE for UMTS: OFDMA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access,” Holma, H. et al. (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., United Kingdom, 2009, pp. 83-135. |
Mecklenbrauker, W., “A Tutorial on Non-Parametric Bilinear Time-Frequency Signal Representations,” In: Time and Frequency Representation of Signals and Systems, Longo, G. et al. (eds.), Springer-Verlag Wien, vol. 309, pp. 11-68 (1989). |
Nehorai, A. et al., “MURI: Adaptive waveform design for full spectral dominance (2005-2010),” AFOSR FA9550-05-1-0443, Final Report, [online], Mar. 11, 2011 Retrieved on May 11, 2013, Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA565420>, 103 pages. |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2015-518647, dated Jul. 7, 2015, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/754,596, dated Apr. 19, 2016, 18 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/809,129, dated Jul. 19, 2016, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/617,962, dated Sep. 6, 2017, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/050825, dated Feb. 8, 2017, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/052524, dated Dec. 20, 2016, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/374,995, dated Aug. 7, 2017, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/025797, dated Jun. 21, 2017, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/030259, dated Aug. 4, 2016, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/152,464, dated Apr. 6, 2017, 10 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2013280487, dated May 2, 2016, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/031928, dated Oct. 7, 2016, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/188,946, dated May 8, 2017, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/038584, dated Sep. 26, 2016, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,668, dated Feb. 16, 2017, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/031909, dated Aug. 11, 2016, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/194,494, dated May 5, 2017, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/039662, dated Nov. 29, 2016, 14 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,653, dated Jun. 2, 2017, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/208,545, dated Aug. 21, 2017, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/041940, dated Oct. 20, 2016, 8 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 13768150.8, dated Oct. 30, 2015, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/033652, dated Jun. 12, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/041417, dated Oct. 1, 2015, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/805,407, dated Dec. 14, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/041420, dated Oct. 1, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/046634, dated Dec. 7, 2017, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/17090, dated Jun. 14, 2018. 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/273,649, filed Feb. 12, 2019, dated Jan. 3, 2020. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/273,649, filed Feb. 12, 2019, dated Jul. 29, 2020. |
Okabe et al., 10-Gbps forward error correction system for 120-GHz-band wireless transmission, IEEE, Conference Paper, pp. 472-475 (Year: 2010). |
Yiqing Zhou et al.: “OFCDM: a promising broadband wireless access technique”, IEEE Communications Magazine, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, US, vol. 46, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2008 (Mar. 1, 2008), pp. 38-49, XP011225377. |
Lin Zhang Et Al: “Hierarchical MMSE linear equalization for multilayer coded modulation”, Communications, Circuits and Systems, 2009. ICCCAS 2009. International Conference On, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Jul. 23, 2009 (Jul. 23, 2009), pp. 164-168. |
Mei Chen et al.: “Multilevel Coding for Nonlinear ISI Channels” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IEEE Press, USA, vol. 55, No. 5, May 1, 2009 (May 1, 2009), pp. 2292-2303. |
U. Wachsmann et al: Multilevel codes: theoretical concepts and practical design rules IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 45, No. 5, Jul. 1, 1999 (Jul. 1, 1999), pp. 1361-1391. |
Extended European Search Report, 17840382.0, dated Mar. 20, 2020, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180167165 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62374585 | Aug 2016 | US | |
62379184 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2017/046634 | Aug 2017 | US |
Child | 15889867 | US |