Iterative multi-level equalization and decoding

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10873418
  • Patent Number
    10,873,418
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 6, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 22, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A wireless communication method for transmitting wireless signals from a transmitter includes receiving information bits for transmission, segmenting the information bits into a stream of segments, applying a corresponding forward error correction (FEC) code and an interleaver to each of the stream of segments and combining outputs of the interleaving to generate a stream of symbols, processing the stream of symbols to generate a waveform, and transmitting the waveform over a communication medium.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present document relates to wireless communication, and more particularly, transmission and reception of multi-level constellation signals.


BACKGROUND

Due to an explosive growth in the number of wireless user devices and the amount of wireless data that these devices can generate or consume, current wireless communication networks are fast running out of bandwidth to accommodate such a high growth in data traffic and provide high quality of service to users.


Various efforts are underway in the telecommunication industry to come up with next generation of wireless technologies that can keep up with the demand on performance of wireless devices and networks.


SUMMARY

This document discloses techniques for transmission and reception of signals with improved error-rate performance, using multi-level constellations symbols.


In one example aspect, a method of wireless signal transmission is disclosed. The method includes receiving information bits for transmission, segmenting the information bits into a stream of segments, applying a corresponding forward error correction (FEC) code to each of the stream of segments, combining the streams to generate a stream of symbols, processing the stream of symbols to generate a waveform, and transmitting the waveform over a communication medium.


In another example aspect, a wireless communication method, implemented at a receiver-side is disclosed. The method include performing channel equalization on the signal to generate a channel equalized signal, logically dividing the channel equalized signal into a first number of segments, wherein the number of segment is equal to a second number of segments used at a transmitter-side to generate the signal, demodulating and symbol de-mapping the channel equalization signal in successive steps such that each step operates to recover one or more bits of one of the number of the segments to generate a demodulated bitstream, processing the demodulated bitstream to generate information related to the bits of the signal, and providing a feedback signal to the channel equalization operation based on the processing of the demodulated bitstream. The order in which the successive steps are performed depends on a reliability of success of recovering the one or more bits in each of the successive steps.


In another example aspect, a wireless communication apparatus that includes a processor is disclosed. The apparatus is configured to implement one of the methods described herein.


These, and other, features are described in this document.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Drawings described herein are used to provide a further understanding and constitute a part of this application. Example embodiments and illustrations thereof are used to explain the technology rather than limiting its scope.



FIG. 1 shows an example communication network.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an example of a transmission system.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an example of a multi-level transmission system.



FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of an example iterative receiver apparatus.



FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of an example iterative receiver apparatus that uses multi-level decoding.



FIG. 6 shows a flowchart of an example wireless communication transmission method.



FIG. 7 shows a flowchart of an example wireless communication reception method.



FIG. 8 shows an example of a wireless transceiver apparatus.



FIG. 9 is a block diagram showing an example of a multi-level transmission system that includes an interleaving function.



FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing of an example of an iterative receiver apparatus that includes a de-interleaving function.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

To make the purposes, technical solutions and advantages of this disclosure more apparent, various embodiments are described in detail below with reference to the drawings. Unless otherwise noted, embodiments and features in embodiments of the present document may be combined with each other.


Section headings are used in the present document, including the appendices, to improve readability of the description and do not in any way limit the discussion to the respective sections only.



FIG. 1 shows an example communication network 100 in which the disclosed technologies can be implemented. The network 100 may include a base station transmitter that transmits wireless signals s(t) (downlink signals) to one or more receivers 102, the received signal being denoted as r(t), which may be located in a variety of locations, including inside or outside a building and in a moving vehicle. The receivers may transmit uplink transmissions to the base station, typically located near the wireless transmitter. The technology described herein may be implemented at a receiver 102, or by the receiving function of the base station.


A typical wireless signal transmission system usually may include a transmit chain 200, as shown in FIG. 2. Source data 202 is segmented into blocks (204), which are encoded by a Forward-Error-Correction (FEC) code of rate R into codewords (206). These codewords are segmented (208) into groups of q bits where each group is mapped to a constellation symbol (such as M-QAM, where 2q=M). These symbols may be transformed by an orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) transform (210) and then used for the generation of the transmission waveform (212). In some embodiments, an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) technique may be used in 210. Alternatively, modulation based on other modulations schemes such as dispersed OTFS or a general M-dimensional transform may also be possible.


In transmit chain 200, all the source bits have (almost) equal protection by the FEC code, but the coded bits, which are mapped into different positions in the constellation symbol's label, do not typically have equal protection. Some of the bits in the constellation label may be more reliable than other bits (have lower probability of error). For example, in some standard constellation mappings, such as Gray mapping, the Most-Significant-Bits (MSBs) are typically more reliable than the Least-Significant-Bits (LSBs).


Described herein are alternative method for data segmentation and encoding along with its matching iterative receiver, which is advantageous in terms of error-rate performance.


Multi-Level Data Segmentation and Encoding



FIG. 3 depicts an example of a transmit chain 300 that uses multi-level data segmentation and encoding. In the scheme implemented by the transmit chain 300, shown in FIG. 3, the data is segmented into q multiple blocks of different sizes and encoded in q different levels by multiple FEC codes (306a to 306q) of different rates R1, R2, . . . , Rq. In the simplest case, each FEC output is used to map a specific bit in each constellation symbol. For example, 8-QAM may be encoded with 3 levels using 3 different FEC codes. Their output maps the MSB, middle bit and LSB of the constellation symbol's label. In some embodiments, different sets of the multiple FEC codes (306a to 306q), depending on the portion of data packet being sent, may be used. For example, a first FEC code group may be used for headers, while a second FEC code group may be used for payload of the packet being transmitted.


In various embodiments, the number of levels may be smaller than log2 M and each FEC may be connected to more than one bit in the constellation label. For example, in constellation mappings (308) where the real part of the complex constellation is independent of the imaginary part, pairs of constellation bits (one mapped to the real and one mapped to the imaginary) may be encoded together.


To achieve the best error-rate performance, the different FEC code rates may be optimally selected along with the choice of the constellation mapping.


Iterative Equalization & Decoding of Multi-Level Encoded Symbols


In general, iterative receivers exchange extrinsic information between the equalizer and the FEC decoder to achieve close to optimal performance, as shown in FIG. 4 for an OTFS receiver 400. The extrinsic information may include a priori knowledge of which transmission resources (e.g., time slots of subcarriers) use which particular FEC. For example, the equalizer 402 uses prior information on the data symbols coming from the FEC feedback path to improve the equalization of the symbols. This feedback path comprises a symbol mapper 410 and OTFS transformation module 412. Then, these symbols are converted to bit likelihoods that are FEC decoded. Several iterations are performed until all the source data is decoded correctly, or until some other stopping criteria is met. An inverse OTFS transform module 404 may apply inverse OTFS transform and a symbol demapper 406 may recover bits from modulation symbols.


Compared to other techniques described next, the error-rate performance of the scheme 400 may be degraded. One reason for the degradation may be because of the mixture of bits with different level of reliability in every FEC codeword that is being decoded. The constellation bits with low reliability make it harder for the FEC decoder to converge to the correct codeword and therefore, the feedback to the equalizer has less information to improve the equalization.


When multi-level encoding is applied at the transmitter (e.g., as shown in FIG. 3), the iterative receiver 550, in each decoding iteration, decodes only a part of the constellation bits. It typically starts with the most reliable bits and then proceeds in the next iterations to less reliable ones. This scheme, shown in FIG. 5, allows the equalizer to receive in earlier iterations priors, which are dominant from the constellation symbols point of view and better improve the equalization. When the FEC has successfully decoded one level, it switches to decode the next one. The receiver continues to iterate until all levels have been decoded successfully or until some other stopping criteria is met. The most reliable bits are often bits that are used to decide the “macro” region within the constellation map where a symbol lies—e.g., the quadrant in which a constellation symbol of a 4 or 8 QAM signal lies, followed by sub-quadrant within the quadrant, and so on. Thus, as shown in FIG. 5 the received signal may be equalized by the equalizer 402. In the forward path, the equalized signal may undergo an inverse OTFS transform (404), and the symbols from the resulting transformed signal may be demapped for decoding by multiple different FECs FEC1 to FECq (modules 558a to 558q). In the feedback path, the decoded symbol (bit) outputs of the FEC modules may be mapped to symbols (410) and transformed into OTFS domain signals (symbols) for feedback to the equalizer 402. As described above, in some implementations, different forward error correction codes are used for symbols from the multiple symbols corresponding to header and payload portions of the bits from the signal.



FIG. 6 shows a flowchart representation of an example method 600 of wireless signal transmission is disclosed. The method includes receiving information bits for transmission (602), segmenting the information bits into a stream of segments (604), applying a corresponding forward error correction (FEC) code to each of the stream of segments and combining outputs of the FECs to generate a stream of symbols (606), and generating an output signal for transmission (608). The output signal generation operation 608 may include processing the stream of symbols to generate a waveform, and transmitting the waveform over a communication medium. The processing of the stream of symbol may include operations such as digital to analog conversion, lowpass filtering.


In some embodiments, the segmentation operation may comprise serial-to-parallel conversion of the information bits such that each segment has a size equal to the number of bits used to generate constellations of a downstream modulation scheme. For example, 3 bits per segment may be used for 8 QAM modulation.


In some embodiments, the number of bits per segment may be equal to the block size for the downstream forward error correction scheme used. For example, 40 or 80 bit segments may be used for FEC block. In general, FECs with different error protection may be used and thus each FEC block may have a same number of bit size on the output (so that the outputs of each FEC can be combined to form symbols) but may have a different number of input bits. For example, the bit-expansion due to a stronger FEC code may mean fewer input bits will produce the same number of output FEC bits. However, in some embodiments, some FEC modules may have same input and output bit sizes but may offer different degrees of error correction coding due to algorithmic differences in the error correction code used for implementing the FEC.


In some embodiments, the transmission signal generation operation 606 may include application of a symplectic transform such as the OTFS transform to the signal to transform a corresponding delay-Doppler domain signal to a signal that is used for transmission.


In another example aspect, a wireless communication method 700, implemented at a receiver-side is disclosed. The method 700 include performing channel equalization on the signal to generate a channel equalized signal (702), logically dividing the channel equalized signal into a first number of segments, wherein the number of segment is equal to a second number of segments used at a transmitter-side to generate the signal (704), demodulating and symbol de-mapping the channel equalization signal in successive steps such that each step operates to recover one or more bits of one of the number of the segments to generate a demodulated bitstream (706), processing the demodulated bitstream to generate information related to the bits from the signal (708), and providing a feedback signal to the channel equalization operation based on the processing of the demodulated bitstream (710). The order in which the successive steps are performed depends on a reliability of success of recovering the one bit in each of the successive steps.


For example, the processing 710 may include forward error correction decoding using a plurality of forward error correction codes, at least some of which have different block sizes. In some embodiments, the feedback provided in step 710 may be based on performing symbol mapping and orthogonal time frequency space transformation to generate a feedback signal. In some embodiments, the processing operation 710 may include deinterleaving each segment of the first number of segments, and forward error correction decoding using a plurality of forward error correction codes, at least some of which have different block sizes, outputs of the deinterleaving of the first number of segments.



FIG. 8 shows an example of a wireless transceiver apparatus 500. The apparatus 500 may be used to implement method 600 or 700. The apparatus 500 includes a processor 502, a memory 504 that stores processor-executable instructions and data during computations performed by the processor. The apparatus 500 includes reception and/or transmission circuitry 506, e.g., including radio frequency operations for receiving or transmitting signals.



FIG. 9 depicts another example transmit chain 900 that uses multi-level data segmentation and encoding. Compared to the transmit chain 300, in the transmit chain 900, after data segmentation, each data segment may be encoded by its own FEC code (FEC1 to FECq) and the corresponding interleaver functions 902a to 902q. The resulting outputs of the interleaver may then be combined prior to the symbol mapping 308. For example, data segments may represent bits with different importance or significance (e.g., least significant bit position, most significant bit position etc.). The corresponding FEC code may have a block size to provide an error protection that is proportional to the importance of that bit in the message being transmitted.



FIG. 10 depicts another example OTFS receiver 1000 in which, compared to the receiver 400, a deinterleaving function is used for each level. In the forward path of the receive chain, deinterleavers 1002a to 1002q are used, respectively, to deinterleave segments generated from the symbol demapper. The deinterleaved output of each deinterleaver is then fed into the corresponding FEC block. In the feedback path, the output of each FEC block is fed into the corresponding interleaver function 1004a to 1004q and the outputs of the interleaving operations are used by the symbol demapper 410.


Examples of Multi-Level Coding and Decoding Schemes


In some multi-level-coding schemes where different code rates are assigned to different bits in the constellation label, along with methods for obtaining the optimal rates. Decoder embodiments may start from the least reliable bits, decode them, remove them from the received signal and decode the next reliable bit up to the most reliable bit.


It will be appreciated that the disclosed techniques can be used to improve transmission/reception performance of wireless apparatus.


The disclosed and other embodiments, modules and the functional operations described in this document can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this document and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. The disclosed and other embodiments can be implemented as one or more computer program products, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a computer readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. The computer readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more them. The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them. A propagated signal is an artificially generated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, that is generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus.


A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a standalone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.


The processes and logic flows described in this document can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).


Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto optical disks; and CD ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.


While this patent document contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of an invention that is claimed or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this document in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or a variation of a sub-combination. Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results.


Only a few examples and implementations are disclosed. Variations, modifications, and enhancements to the described examples and implementations and other implementations can be made based on what is disclosed.

Claims
  • 1. A wireless communication method for transmitting orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulated wireless signals from a transmitter, comprising: receiving information bits for transmission;segmenting the information bits into a stream of segments;applying a corresponding forward error correction (FEC) code to each of the stream of segments and combining outputs of the FEC codes to generate a first stream of symbols;transforming, using an OTFS transformation comprising a symplectic transform, the first stream of symbols into a second stream of symbols;processing the second stream of symbols to generate a waveform; andtransmitting the waveform over a communication medium.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein each segment in the stream of segments has an equal bit length.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein at least some of the FEC codes have different block sizes from each other.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein each segment in the stream of segments is applied to one or more constellation symbol labels.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the combining the outputs of the FEC codes includes: performing, on an output of each FEC, a corresponding interleaving operation; andcombining outputs of the interleaving operations to generate the first stream of symbols.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein different FEC codes are used for header and payload portions of the information bits.
  • 7. A wireless communication method, implemented at a receiver-side, for receiving a signal comprising multiple symbols; comprising: performing channel equalization on the signal to generate a first channel equalized signal;transforming, using an inverse orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) transformation comprising an inverse symplectic transform, the first channel equalized signal into a second channel equalized signal;logically dividing second the channel equalized signal into a first number of segments;demodulating and symbol de-mapping the channel equalization signal in successive steps such that each step operates to recover one or more bits of one of the first number of segments to generate a demodulated bitstream, wherein an order in which the successive steps are performed depends on a reliability of success of recovering the one or more bits in each of the successive steps;processing the demodulated bitstream to generate information related to the bits from the signal; andproviding a feedback signal to the channel equalization operation based on the processing of the demodulated bitstream.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the processing the demodulated bitstream comprises forward error correction decoding using a plurality of forward error correction codes, at least some of which have different block sizes.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the providing the feedback signal comprises performing symbol mapping and an orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) transformation to generate the feedback signal.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, wherein the order of which the successive steps are performed is from the most reliable bit to the least reliable bit.
  • 11. The method of claim 7, wherein the processing the demodulated bitstream comprises deinterleaving each segment of the first number of segments, and forward error correction decoding using a plurality of forward error correction codes, at least some of which have different block sizes, outputs of the deinterleaving of the first number of segments.
  • 12. The method of claim 7, wherein the providing the feedback signal comprises interleaving, the recovered one or more bit-related information from each of the first number of segments using a corresponding interleaver depth.
  • 13. A wireless communication device comprising a processor configured to implement a method for transmitting orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulated wireless signals from a transmitter the method comprising: receiving information bits for transmission;segmenting the information bits into a stream of segments;applying a corresponding forward error correction (FEC) code to each of the stream of segments and combining outputs of the FEC codes to generate a first stream of symbols;transforming, using an orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) transformation comprising a symplectic transform, the first stream of symbols into a second stream of symbols;processing the second stream of symbols to generate a waveform; andtransmitting the waveform over a communication medium.
  • 14. A non-transitory computer-readable memory storing instructions comprising processor-implementable code, wherein the code include instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to implement method for transmitting orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulated wireless signals from a transmitter, comprising: instructions for receiving information bits for transmission;instructions for segmenting the information bits into a stream of segments;instructions for applying a corresponding forward error correction (FEC) code to each of the stream of segments and combining outputs of the FEC codes to generate a stream of symbols;instructions for transforming, using an orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) transformation comprising a symplectic transform, the first stream of symbols into a second stream of symbols;instructions for processing the second stream of symbols to generate a waveform; andinstructions for transmitting the waveform over a communication medium.
  • 15. A wireless communication device comprising a processor configured to implement a method for receiving a signal comprising multiple symbols, the method comprising: performing channel equalization on the signal to generate a first channel equalized signal;transforming, using an inverse orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) transformation comprising an inverse symplectic transform, the first channel equalized signal into a second channel equalized signal;logically dividing the second channel equalized signal into a first number of segments;demodulating and symbol de-mapping the channel equalization signal in successive steps such that each step operates to recover one or more bits of one of the first number of segments to generate a demodulated bitstream, wherein an order in which the successive steps are performed depends on a reliability of success of recovering the one or more bits in each of the successive steps;processing the demodulated bitstream to generate information related to the bits from the signal; andproviding a feedback signal to the channel equalization operation based on the processing of the demodulated bitstream.
  • 16. The wireless communication device of claim 15, wherein the processing the demodulated bitstream comprises forward error correction decoding using a plurality of forward error correction codes, at least some of which have different block sizes.
  • 17. A non-transitory computer-readable memory storing instructions comprising processor-implementable code, wherein the code includes instructions which, when executed by the processor, causes the processor to implement method for receiving a signal comprising multiple symbols, comprising: instructions for performing channel equalization on the signal to generate a first channel equalized signal;instructions for transforming, using an inverse orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) transformation comprising an inverse symplectic transform, the first channel equalized signal into a second channel equalized signal;instructions for logically dividing the second channel equalized signal into a first number of segments;instructions for demodulating and symbol de-mapping the channel equalization signal in successive steps such that each step operates to recover one or more bits of one of the first number of segments to generate a demodulated bitstream, wherein an order in which the successive steps are performed depends on a reliability of success of recovering the one or more bits in each of the successive steps;instructions for processing the demodulated bitstream to generate information related to the bits from the signal; andinstructions for providing a feedback signal to the channel equalization operation based on the processing of the demodulated bitstream.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer-readable memory of claim 17, wherein the processing the demodulated bitstream comprises forward error correction decoding using a plurality of forward error correction codes, at least some of which have different block sizes.
PRIORITY CLAIM

This patent document is a continuation-in-part of PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/046634, filed Aug. 11, 2017 which claims the benefits and priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/374,585, filed Aug. 12, 2016, and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/379,184, filed Aug. 24, 2016, all entitled “ITERATIVE MULTI-LEVEL EQUALIZATION AND DECODING.” The entire content of the before-mentioned patent applications is incorporated by reference as part of the disclosure of this application.

US Referenced Citations (198)
Number Name Date Kind
4754493 Coates Jun 1988 A
5083135 Nagy et al. Jan 1992 A
5182642 Gersdorff et al. Jan 1993 A
5623511 Bar-David et al. Apr 1997 A
5831977 Dent Nov 1998 A
5872542 Simons et al. Feb 1999 A
5956624 Hunsinger et al. Sep 1999 A
6212246 Hendrickson Apr 2001 B1
6275966 Sitterley Aug 2001 B1
6289063 Duxbury Sep 2001 B1
6356555 Rakib et al. Mar 2002 B1
6388621 Lynch May 2002 B1
6426983 Rakib et al. Jul 2002 B1
6498789 Honda et al. Dec 2002 B1
6584158 Ito Jun 2003 B1
6608864 Strait Aug 2003 B1
6631168 Izumi Oct 2003 B2
6704366 Combes et al. Mar 2004 B1
6956814 Campanella Oct 2005 B1
7010048 Shattil Mar 2006 B1
7170951 Perthold Jan 2007 B1
7327812 Auer Feb 2008 B2
7392018 Ebert et al. Jun 2008 B1
7689049 Monro Mar 2010 B2
7773685 Tirkkonen et al. Aug 2010 B2
7864877 Hottinen Jan 2011 B2
8229017 Lee et al. Jul 2012 B1
8259845 Dent Sep 2012 B2
8401131 Fety et al. Mar 2013 B2
8547988 Hadani et al. Oct 2013 B2
8619892 Vetter et al. Dec 2013 B2
8717210 Eldar et al. May 2014 B2
8879378 Rakib et al. Nov 2014 B2
8892048 Turner Nov 2014 B1
8976851 Hadani et al. Mar 2015 B2
9031141 Hadani et al. May 2015 B2
9071285 Hadani et al. Jun 2015 B2
9071286 Hadani et al. Jun 2015 B2
9083483 Rakib et al. Jul 2015 B1
9083595 Rakib et al. Jul 2015 B2
9130638 Hadani et al. Sep 2015 B2
9282528 Hashimoto Mar 2016 B2
9294315 Hadani et al. Mar 2016 B2
9444514 Hadani et al. Sep 2016 B2
9548840 Hadani et al. Jan 2017 B2
9553984 Krause et al. Jan 2017 B2
9590779 Hadani et al. Mar 2017 B2
9634719 Rakib et al. Apr 2017 B2
9660851 Hadani et al. May 2017 B2
9668148 Hadani et al. May 2017 B2
9712354 Hadani et al. Jul 2017 B2
9729281 Hadani et al. Aug 2017 B2
20010031022 Petrus et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010033614 Hudson Oct 2001 A1
20010046205 Easton et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020001308 Heuer Jan 2002 A1
20020034191 Shattil Mar 2002 A1
20020104058 Rappaport Aug 2002 A1
20020136276 Franceschini Sep 2002 A1
20020181388 Jain et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020181390 Mody et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020181607 Izumi Dec 2002 A1
20020194570 Birru Dec 2002 A1
20030073464 Giannakis et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030185295 Yousef Oct 2003 A1
20030235147 Walton et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040044715 Aldroubi et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040086027 Shattil May 2004 A1
20040174812 Murakami et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040189581 Sako et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040218523 Varshney et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050157778 Trachewsket et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050157820 Wongwirawat et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050180517 Abe Aug 2005 A1
20050207334 Hadad Sep 2005 A1
20050251844 Martone et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060008021 Bonnet Jan 2006 A1
20060039270 Strohmer et al. Feb 2006 A1
20070014272 Palanki et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038691 Candes et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070078661 Sriram et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070104283 Han et al. May 2007 A1
20070110131 Guess et al. May 2007 A1
20070140320 Banna Jun 2007 A1
20070211952 Faber et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070237181 Cho et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070253465 Muharemovic et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070253504 Hasegawa Nov 2007 A1
20080043857 Dias et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080117999 Kadous et al. May 2008 A1
20080165873 Ghosh et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080186843 Ma et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080187062 Pan et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080232504 Ma et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080250294 Ngo Oct 2008 A1
20080310383 Kowalski Dec 2008 A1
20090080403 Hamdi Mar 2009 A1
20090092259 Jot et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090103593 Bergamo Apr 2009 A1
20090122854 Zhu et al. May 2009 A1
20090161804 Chrabieh et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090204627 Hadani Aug 2009 A1
20090222226 Baraniuk et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090276680 Chiu Nov 2009 A1
20090303961 Popovic et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100001901 Baraniuk et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100008432 Kim et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100014558 Nieto Jan 2010 A1
20100027608 Priotti Feb 2010 A1
20100080312 Moffatt et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100111138 Hosur et al. May 2010 A1
20100142476 Jiang et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100187914 Rada et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100238787 Guey Sep 2010 A1
20100254484 Hamaguchi et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100277308 Potkonjak Nov 2010 A1
20100303136 Ashikhmin et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100322349 Lee et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110007789 Garmany Jan 2011 A1
20110013505 Dyson Jan 2011 A1
20110096814 Wu Apr 2011 A1
20110110532 Svendsen May 2011 A1
20110116489 Grandhi May 2011 A1
20110116516 Hwang et al. May 2011 A1
20110126071 Han et al. May 2011 A1
20110131463 Gunnam Jun 2011 A1
20110216808 Tong et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110286502 Adachi et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110287778 Levin et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110292971 Hadani et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110293030 Rakib et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110299379 Sesia et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110305267 Rius et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120021769 Lindoff et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120051457 Ma et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120140716 Baldemair et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120170680 Stern Jul 2012 A1
20120170684 Yim et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120201322 Rakib et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120213098 Sun Aug 2012 A1
20120235795 Liao et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120269201 Atungsiri et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120272117 Stadelmeier et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120320994 Loghin et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130021977 Yang et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130058390 Haas et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130077579 Cho et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130083661 Gupta et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130121497 Smaragdis et al. May 2013 A1
20130130751 Vummintala May 2013 A1
20130230010 Kim et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130260787 Hashimoto Oct 2013 A1
20130279627 Wu et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130311848 Purohit Nov 2013 A1
20130315133 Wang Nov 2013 A1
20140143639 Loghin et al. May 2014 A1
20140161154 Hadani et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140169385 Hadani et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140169406 Hadani et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140169433 Hadani et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140169436 Hadani et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140169437 Hadani et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140169441 Hadani et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140247803 Arambepola et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140348252 Siohan et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140364128 Lee et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150117395 Hadani et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150326273 Rakib et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150327085 Hadani et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150349995 Zhang Dec 2015 A1
20150382231 Jabbar et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160043835 Hadani et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160135132 Donepudi et al. May 2016 A1
20160182269 Hadani et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160191217 Hadani et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160191280 Hadani et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160254889 Shattil Sep 2016 A1
20160277225 Frenne et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160309345 Tehrani et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160380743 Rakib Dec 2016 A1
20160381576 Hadani et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170012749 Rakib et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170012810 Rakib et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170019238 Sharma Jan 2017 A1
20170019297 Rakib Jan 2017 A1
20170033899 Rakib et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170040711 Rakib et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170078054 Hadani et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170099122 Hadani et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170099607 Hadani et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170149594 Rakib May 2017 A1
20170149595 Rakib et al. May 2017 A1
20170201354 Hadani et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170207817 Hadani et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170222700 Hadani et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170230215 Rakib et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170244524 Hadani et al. Aug 2017 A1
20190173617 Kons Jun 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (18)
Number Date Country
1235720 Nov 1999 CN
101682316 Mar 2010 CN
101939935 Jan 2011 CN
1432168 Jun 2004 EP
2011127910 Jun 2011 JP
2007004297 Jan 2007 WO
2011137699 Nov 2011 WO
2011150315 Dec 2011 WO
2013148546 Oct 2013 WO
2014004585 Jan 2014 WO
2016014596 Jan 2016 WO
2016014598 Jan 2016 WO
2016176642 Nov 2016 WO
2016183230 Nov 2016 WO
2016183240 Nov 2016 WO
2016209848 Dec 2016 WO
2017003952 Jan 2017 WO
2017011478 Jan 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (81)
Entry
Chilamkurti et al., Reliable Transmission Mechanism for safety-critical information in vehicular wireless networks, IEEE, vol. 2, pp. 514-517 (Year: 2010).
Ishizaki et al., Forward link capacity evaluation for W-CDMA with amplitude limited and forward error correction, IEEE, vol. 1, Conference Paper, pp. 439-443. (Year: 2002).
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/117,119, dated Aug. 5, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/117,119, dated Feb. 28, 2014, 13 pages.
Banelli, P. et al., “Modulation Formats and Waveforms for 5G Networks: Who Will Be the Heir of OFDM?,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 81, pp. 80-93, Nov. 2014.
El Hattachi, R. et al., “NGMN 5G Initiative White Paper,” NGMN Alliance, Feb. 17, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.ngmn.org/uploads/media/NGMN_5G_White_Paper_V1_0.pdf, 125 pages.
Rusek, F. et al., “Scaling Up MIMO, Opportunities and Challenges with Very Large Arrays,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 40-60 (2013).
Vodafone, “Cellular Internet of Things: Architectural Aspects,” RP-150869, 3GPP RAN#68, Malmo, Sweden (Jun. 9, 2015), 19 pages.
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 11787483.4, dated Sep. 9, 2014, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/038302, dated Nov. 15, 2011, 8 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2011/038302, dated Dec. 4, 2012, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/117,124, dated Feb. 22, 2013, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/117,124, dated Aug. 8, 2013, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/605,957, dated Jun. 22, 2017, 6 pages.
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 13809004.8, dated Apr. 14, 2016, 8 pages.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 13809004.8, dated Feb. 17, 2017, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,087, dated Feb. 25, 2015, 9 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,087, dated Nov. 12, 2014, 14 pages.
Gurevich, S. et al. “Group Representation Design of Digital Signals and Sequences,” S.W. Golomb et al. (eds.), Seta 2008, LNCS 5203, pp. 153-166, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (2008).
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/047723, dated Oct. 29, 2013, 17 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2013/047723, dated Dec. 31, 2014, 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,088, dated Feb. 18, 2015, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,088, dated Nov. 28, 2014, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,086, dated Dec. 26, 2014, 8 pages.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,086, dated Mar. 19, 2015, 4 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,086, dated Oct. 14, 2014, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,089, dated Dec. 24, 2014, 13 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,089, dated Aug. 14, 2015, 7 pages.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,091, dated Jun. 11, 2015, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,091, dated Apr. 24, 2015, 8 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,091, dated Jan. 27, 2015, 15 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,092, dated Oct. 8, 2014, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,092, dated Oct. 24, 2014, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,095, dated Apr. 30, 2015, 11 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,095, dated Nov. 4, 2015, 9 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,095, dated Jun. 1, 2016, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/717,886, dated Apr. 19, 2016, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,377, dated Dec. 11, 2015, 12 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,377, dated Jul. 13, 2016, 17 pages.
Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2013239970, dated Dec. 8, 2015, 3 pages.
“AT&T Annual Report 2014,” Opening Our Network [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: Sep. 22, 2016. <URL: http://www.att.com/Investor/ATT_Annual/2014/att_introduces_new_concepts_for_telecom_network.html>, 5 pages.
Catt, “UL ACK/NACK transmission methods for LTE-A,” 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #60bis, R1-102453, Beijing, China, Apr. 12-16, 2010, 8 pages.
Toskala, A. et al., “Physical Layer,” Chapter 5 In: “LTE for UMTS: OFDMA and SC-FDMA Based Radio Access,” Holma, H. et al. (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., United Kingdom, 2009, pp. 83-135.
Mecklenbrauker, W., “A Tutorial on Non-Parametric Bilinear Time-Frequency Signal Representations,” In: Time and Frequency Representation of Signals and Systems, Longo, G. et al. (eds.), Springer-Verlag Wien, vol. 309, pp. 11-68 (1989).
Nehorai, A. et al., “MURI: Adaptive waveform design for full spectral dominance (2005-2010),” AFOSR FA9550-05-1-0443, Final Report, [online], Mar. 11, 2011 Retrieved on May 11, 2013, Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA565420>, 103 pages.
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2015-518647, dated Jul. 7, 2015, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/754,596, dated Apr. 19, 2016, 18 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/809,129, dated Jul. 19, 2016, 5 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/617,962, dated Sep. 6, 2017, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/050825, dated Feb. 8, 2017, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/052524, dated Dec. 20, 2016, 8 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/374,995, dated Aug. 7, 2017, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/025797, dated Jun. 21, 2017, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/030259, dated Aug. 4, 2016, 13 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/152,464, dated Apr. 6, 2017, 10 pages.
Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2013280487, dated May 2, 2016, 3 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/031928, dated Oct. 7, 2016, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/188,946, dated May 8, 2017, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/038584, dated Sep. 26, 2016, 8 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,668, dated Feb. 16, 2017, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/031909, dated Aug. 11, 2016, 13 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/194,494, dated May 5, 2017, 16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/039662, dated Nov. 29, 2016, 14 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,653, dated Jun. 2, 2017, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/208,545, dated Aug. 21, 2017, 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/041940, dated Oct. 20, 2016, 8 pages.
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 13768150.8, dated Oct. 30, 2015, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/033652, dated Jun. 12, 2013, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/041417, dated Oct. 1, 2015, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/805,407, dated Dec. 14, 2016, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/041420, dated Oct. 1, 2015, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/046634, dated Dec. 7, 2017, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/17090, dated Jun. 14, 2018. 13 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/273,649, filed Feb. 12, 2019, dated Jan. 3, 2020.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/273,649, filed Feb. 12, 2019, dated Jul. 29, 2020.
Okabe et al., 10-Gbps forward error correction system for 120-GHz-band wireless transmission, IEEE, Conference Paper, pp. 472-475 (Year: 2010).
Yiqing Zhou et al.: “OFCDM: a promising broadband wireless access technique”, IEEE Communications Magazine, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, US, vol. 46, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2008 (Mar. 1, 2008), pp. 38-49, XP011225377.
Lin Zhang Et Al: “Hierarchical MMSE linear equalization for multilayer coded modulation”, Communications, Circuits and Systems, 2009. ICCCAS 2009. International Conference On, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Jul. 23, 2009 (Jul. 23, 2009), pp. 164-168.
Mei Chen et al.: “Multilevel Coding for Nonlinear ISI Channels” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IEEE Press, USA, vol. 55, No. 5, May 1, 2009 (May 1, 2009), pp. 2292-2303.
U. Wachsmann et al: Multilevel codes: theoretical concepts and practical design rules IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 45, No. 5, Jul. 1, 1999 (Jul. 1, 1999), pp. 1361-1391.
Extended European Search Report, 17840382.0, dated Mar. 20, 2020, 15 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180167165 A1 Jun 2018 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62374585 Aug 2016 US
62379184 Aug 2016 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/US2017/046634 Aug 2017 US
Child 15889867 US