The present disclosure relates generally to endoscopic surgical instruments, and in particular to component arrangements and manufacturing processes suitable for use with instruments having relatively small end effectors.
Typically in a laparoscopic, an endoscopic, or other minimally invasive surgical procedure, a small incision or puncture is made in a patient's body. A cannula is then inserted into a body cavity through the incision, which provides a passageway for inserting various surgical devices such as scissors, dissectors, retractors, or similar instruments. To facilitate operability through the cannula, instruments adapted for laparoscopic surgery typically include a relatively narrow shaft supporting an end effector at its distal end and a handle at its proximal end. Arranging the shaft of such an instrument through the cannula allows a surgeon to manipulate the proximal handle from outside the body to cause the distal end effector to carry out a surgical procedure at a remote surgical site inside the body. This type of endoscopic procedure has proven beneficial over traditional open surgery due to reduced trauma, improved healing and other attendant advantages.
To fully realize the benefits of endoscopic surgery, instruments used for this purpose are typically designed to pass through a cannula providing a relatively small opening. For example, a cannula opening may have a diameter in the range of about five millimeters to about twelve millimeters. Even smaller openings may prove beneficial if instruments are designed without compromising the integrity or functionality of the instrument.
One type of endoscopic instrument that presents a particular challenge for designers is an electrosurgical forceps for sealing tissue. An electrosurgical forceps is a relatively complex instrument typically including several moving parts. For example, a pair of moveable jaw members may be provided for grasping tissue, and reciprocating blade may move to cut through the tissue at an appropriate time. Also contributing to the complexity is a stop member that controls the gap, or a minimum distance maintained between sealing surfaces of the jaw members. Maintaining an appropriate gap between the sealing surfaces is a necessary factor for forming an effective tissue seal. These and other manufacturing challenges become increasingly difficult to overcome when designing instruments to fit through smaller cannula openings. Conventional machining and assembly methods may lend difficulty to instrument manufacturing as the size of the components is reduced. Therefore, a jaw configuration that reduces the number or complexity of components may prove beneficial for small diameter instruments.
The present disclosure describes an endoscopic bipolar forceps assembly that may be configured for use with a cannula having an opening of five millimeters or less in diameter. Several component arrangements and manufacturing process are described herein that may prove useful for larger instruments as well.
According to an aspect of the disclosure, an endoscopic forceps for joining tissue includes an elongate shaft with a distal end and a proximal end. The elongate shaft defines an instrument axis. An end effector adjacent the distal end of the elongate shaft includes first and second jaw members each supporting an opposed sealing surface for clamping tissue. At least one of the jaw members is movable relative to the instrument axis such that the jaw members are movable between a first spaced-apart configuration and a second closed configuration for grasping tissue. A cutting instrument including a reciprocating blade is translatable relative to the sealing surfaces to sever tissue clamped between the jaw members. The reciprocating blade contacts an undersurface of an opposite jaw member when the jaw members are in the second configuration to define a gap distance between the sealing surfaces. A handle adjacent to the proximal end of the elongate shaft is operable to induce motion in the jaw members to move the jaw members between the first configuration the second configuration. An actuator is operable to selectively translate the reciprocating blade.
The cutting instrument may include a distal blade and a proximal blade each contacting the undersurface of the opposite jaw member when the end effector is in the closed configuration to provide bilateral support to the opposite jaw member. The proximal blade and the distal blade may be independently movable relative to the sealing surfaces.
The reciprocating blade may include a tubular member extending proximally through the elongate shaft and a taper at a distal end of the tubular member that forms a cutting edge.
At least one of the sealing surfaces may be spring biased against a body of the respective jaw member. At least one of the first and second jaw members may include a generally flat stamped spine supporting a laterally extending backing to form the respective sealing surface. The end effector may be configured to fit through a five millimeter diameter cannula opening.
According to another aspect of the disclosure, an endoscopic forceps for joining tissue includes an elongate shaft with a distal end and a proximal end. The elongate shaft defines an instrument axis. An end effector adjacent the distal end of the elongate shaft includes first and second jaw members each supporting an opposed sealing surface for clamping tissue. At least one of the jaw members is movable relative to the instrument axis to move the jaw members a first spaced-apart configuration and a second closed configuration for grasping tissue. A cutting instrument including a reciprocating blade is translatable relative to the sealing surfaces to sever tissue clamped between the jaw members. The reciprocating blade includes a tubular member extending proximally through the elongate shaft and a taper at a distal end of the tubular member that forms a cutting edge. A handle adjacent the proximal end of the elongate shaft is operable to induce motion in the jaw members to move the jaw members between the first configuration the second configuration. An actuator is operable to selectively translate the reciprocating blade. The tubular member may include a lateral opening to provide access to an interior region of the tubular member.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the present disclosure and, together with the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
Detailed embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein. The disclosed embodiments are not to be interpreted as limiting, but are merely examples to provide a representative basis for the claims. In the drawings and in the description which follows, the term “proximal,” as is traditional, will refer to the direction toward the operator or a relative position on the surgical device or instrument which is closer to the operator, while the term “distal” will refer to the direction away from the operator or a relative position on the instrument which is further from the operator.
Referring initially to
Electrosurgical generator 14 supplies the forceps 12 with electrosurgical energy, typically in the form of monopolar or bipolar radio frequency (RF) energy. In a bipolar mode, electrical energy may be provided through cable 16 and may be directed to two opposed poles on the end effector 20. The electrosurgical energy may be passed through tissue clamped between the jaw members 30, 32 to effect a tissue seal. With respect to a monopolar mode, energy of a first potential is supplied to one or both of the jaw members 30, 32 and a return pad (not shown) carries the energy back to the generator.
Referring now to
Sealing surface 38 on lower jaw member 32 is equipped with a plurality of electrically insulative stop members 44 that project from the sealing surface 38 a particular distance to control the gap between the sealing surfaces 38, 40 when end effector 20 is moved to the closed configuration. When the sealing surface 40 on the upper jaw member 30 contacts the stop members 44, sealing surface 40 is separated from sealing surface 38 by an appropriate gap for sealing tissue. An appropriate gap may be in the range of about 0.001 inches to about 0.006 inches.
A knife channel 46 extends in a generally longitudinal direction along lower jaw member 32. Knife channel 46 supports a knife blade (not shown) that may traverse the knife channel 46 to sever tissue clamped between the sealing surfaces 38, 40. For example, once a tissue seal has been effected, a surgeon may advance a knife blade distally through the knife channel 46. The knife may protrude from the knife channel 46 into a similar channel (not shown) formed in the upper jaw member 30 to ensure that any tissue captured between the jaw members 30, 32 is engaged by the knife.
Various materials and configurations may be used for constructing the jaw bodies 36, 42, the sealing surfaces 38, 40, the stop members 44 and various other components of the end effector 20. For example, jaw bodies 36, 42 may be machined from a stainless steel or similar metal, while stop members 44 may comprise a ceramic material disposed directly on the sealing surface 38. A ceramic material provides electrical insulative properties and is tolerant of the pressures and temperatures associated with tissue sealing for repeated sealing cycles. Alternatively, stop members 44 may be constructed of a plastic material molded onto the body 36 of the lower jaw member 32. Molding a plastic stop member 44 on the body 36 lower jaw member 32 may prove to be an attractive option for small instruments to permit a more significant portion of the sealing surface 38 to contact tissue. A plastic stop member 44 could be molded at a periphery of the body 36 or adjacent the knife channel 46.
Another alternative construction for jaw members 30, 32 includes forming the bodies 36, 42 from an electrically insulative material such as glass or a ceramic. The sealing surfaces 38 and 40 may be constructed with a thin coating of an electrically conductive material applied to the bodies by a physical or chemical vapor deposition process. Vapor deposition is a process commonly employed by the semi-conductor industry to form thin films from electrically conductive materials such as titanium or molybdenum. A sealing surface 38, 40 constructed by vapor deposition could be electrically coupled to a source of electrosurgical energy (e.g., electrosurgical generator 14,
Referring now to
Components formed by this process typically maintain tolerances of about ±0.5 percent, or down to ±0.001 inches for small dimensions, without secondary manufacturing processes. This makes metal injection molding an attractive option for producing the bodies 56, 58 of the jaw members 52 and 54, which are intended to be relatively small. Additionally, the metal substrate permits the bodies 56, 58 of the jaw members 52 and 54 to exhibit the mechanical performance properties required to effectively form a tissue seal. The metal substrate may, for example, comprise a common stainless steel such as 304L, 316L or 440C. Other alloys may be considered to enhance magnetic or thermal expansion properties of the jaw members 52, 54.
A sealing surface 60 is formed in the lower jaw member 54 such that the sealing surface 60 is recessed into the body 58. A periphery 62 of the body 58 extends around the sealing surface 60 to define a gap, or the minimum distance that may be maintained between sealing surface 60 and a sealing surface 64 disposed on the upper jaw member. The periphery 62 may include a semi-conductive film to provide insulation. Sealing surface 64 may be recessed into the body 56 of the upper jaw, or the sealing surface 64 may lie flush with an exterior surface of the upper jaw member 52. The recess may be roughly formed in the body 58 with the metal injection molding process described above. Fine surface adjustments may be made to the flatness or surface finish of the sealing surface 64 by a machining process such as wire EDM manufacturing.
Wire EDM, or electrical discharge machining, is a high precision manufacturing process capable of forming a sealing surface 64 suitably flat and smooth to permit an effective tissue seal. Tolerances of ±0.0002 inches are routinely achieved by the wire EDM process. The process involves removing metal from the jaw body 58 by generating a series of electrical arcs between the body 58 and a moveable electrode in the presence of an electric field. The electrical arcs remove metal along the cutting path by melting and vaporization.
Referring now to
Jaw member 68, depicted in
Stamped spine 80 is a generally flat component formed by stamping a particular profile from a sheet metal or other rigid flat stock material. The spine 80 may be stamped to define the external shape of the proximal projection 70, and may extend the full length of the jaw member 68 into the distal region 72. Stamping is a common process in metal working, wherein a press and a die apply shear pressure to a stock material to form a particular shape. High tolerances may be achieved by stamping, and thus the need for a secondary machining process may be avoided. For example, the spine 80 may be formed including the bore 76 and the slot 78 in a single stamping operation.
The stamped spine 80 supports a backing 82 thereon. The backing 82 extends laterally from the stamped spine 80 to define a width of a sealing surface 74. The backing 82 may extend in a single direction as shown, or in various lateral and vertical directions to form other surfaces of the jaw member 68. Backing 82 may comprise a plastic material molded, or otherwise affixed to the spine 80. An appropriate plastic backing may be configured to project from the jaw member 68 to control a gap between sealing surface 74 and an opposed sealing surface (not shown). Backing 82 may alternatively be constructed from a metallic material such as zinc, magnesium or aluminum.
Jaw member 86, depicted in
Jaw member 96, depicted in
Jaw member 110, depicted in
The appendages 114 and 116 may be constructed of a ceramic to provide electrical insulation to the jaw member 110. For example, proximal appendage 114 includes a pivot bore 122 for receiving a pin (not shown), which may be electrically isolated from the body 112 due to the ceramic construction of the proximal appendage 114. Proximal appendage 114 also provides a step 124 to define a gap distance “g” from sealing surface 120. Distal appendage 116 may also protrude above the sealing surface 120 by the gap distance “g” to provide bilateral support for an opposing jaw member (not shown).
Referring now to
The proximal blade 140 may translate to traverse the knife channel 136 in a distal direction to cut tissue clamped between the upper and lower jaw members 132 and 134, while the distal blade 144 may traverse the channel 136 in a proximal direction to cut tissue. The two blades 140, 144 may be selectively and independently actuated from a handle 18 (
As depicted in
Jaw member 152 depicted in
The body 154 of the jaw may be a die cast or metal injection molded component having the knife channel 158 formed integrally therein. A channel wall 160 protrudes from a laterally interior region of the body 154 to define the knife channel 158. Laterally outward from the channel wall 160, a layer of insulation 162 electrically separates the body 154 from a seal plate 164. The channel wall 160 extends beyond the sealing surface 156 of the seal plate 160 by a distance “g” such that a gap may be formed between the sealing surface 156 and a sealing surface of an opposed jaw member (not shown).
Referring now to
Referring now to
Tissue may be captured within the wire loop 182. As the wire loop 182 is withdrawn into the sheath 184, the tissue may be drawn toward the forward surface 186. An electrical current may be transmitted through the tissue between the wire loop 182 and the forward surface 186 such that the tissue may be electrosurgically cut.
Snare 180 represents a relatively simple mechanism, which may be readily incorporated into a small diameter endoscopic instrument, or may be configured for use in open surgical procedures. Other embodiments include a monopolar snare 180 wherein wire loop 182 and/or the forward surface 186 exhibits a first electrical polarity (−) and a return pad (not shown) exhibits the second electrical polarity (+), and a rigid snare 180 having a wire loop 182 that does not withdraw into the sheath 184.
Referring now to
The wire loop 182 may exhibit a first electrical polarity (−) while the sealing surfaces 196a, 196b exhibit a second electrical polarity (+) to permit an electrical current to be transmitted through tissue captured between the jaw members 192, 194. Alternatively, the sealing surfaces 196a (−), 196b (+) may exhibit opposite electrical polarities, while wire loop 182 (+) exhibits one or the other polarity. The snare 180 may thus serve as a reciprocating blade for electrosurgically cutting tissue as the snare 180 reciprocates within the channel 198. The snare 180 may be configured in any manner described above with reference to
Referring now to
A connector portion 212 of the seal plate receives an electrical lead 214 in a manner similar to a standard wire terminal connector. The electrical lead 214 may be crimped, soldered or otherwise placed in electrical communication with the connector portion 212. In this way, an electrosurgical current may be transmitted between the lead 214 and the sealing surface 206.
Although the foregoing disclosure has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example, for purposes of clarity or understanding, it will be obvious that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/665,722, filed Aug. 1, 2017, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/969,278, filed Aug. 16, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,724,116 which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/574,292, filed Oct. 6, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,512,371. The entire contents of each of the above applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3786814 | Armao | Jan 1974 | A |
D249549 | Pike | Sep 1978 | S |
D263020 | Rau, III | Feb 1982 | S |
4589411 | Friedman | May 1986 | A |
4608981 | Rothfuss et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
D295893 | Sharkany et al. | May 1988 | S |
D295894 | Sharkany et al. | May 1988 | S |
D298353 | Manno | Nov 1988 | S |
D299413 | DeCarolis | Jan 1989 | S |
D343453 | Noda | Jan 1994 | S |
5307976 | Olson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5322055 | Davison et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
D348930 | Olson | Jul 1994 | S |
D349341 | Lichtman et al. | Aug 1994 | S |
D354564 | Medema | Jan 1995 | S |
D358887 | Feinberg | May 1995 | S |
D384413 | Zlock et al. | Sep 1997 | S |
5665100 | Yoon | Sep 1997 | A |
H1745 | Paraschac | Aug 1998 | H |
D402028 | Grimm et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
D408018 | McNaughton | Apr 1999 | S |
D416089 | Barton et al. | Nov 1999 | S |
D424694 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2000 | S |
D425201 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2000 | S |
H1904 | Yates et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
D449886 | Tetzlaff et al. | Oct 2001 | S |
D453923 | Olson | Feb 2002 | S |
D454951 | Bon | Mar 2002 | S |
D457958 | Dycus et al. | May 2002 | S |
D457959 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2002 | S |
H2037 | Yates et al. | Jul 2002 | H |
D465281 | Lang | Nov 2002 | S |
D466209 | Bon | Nov 2002 | S |
6726694 | Blatter et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
D493888 | Reschke | Aug 2004 | S |
D496997 | Dycus et al. | Oct 2004 | S |
D499181 | Dycus et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
D502994 | Blake, III | Mar 2005 | S |
D509297 | Wells | Sep 2005 | S |
7011657 | Truckai et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
D525361 | Hushka | Jul 2006 | S |
D531311 | Guerra et al. | Oct 2006 | S |
D533274 | Visconti et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
D533942 | Kerr et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
D535027 | James et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
7156846 | Dycus et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
D538932 | Malik | Mar 2007 | S |
D541418 | Schechter et al. | Apr 2007 | S |
D541611 | Aglassinge | May 2007 | S |
D541938 | Kerr et al. | May 2007 | S |
D545432 | Watanabe | Jun 2007 | S |
D547154 | Lee | Jul 2007 | S |
D564662 | Moses et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
D567943 | Moses et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
D575395 | Hushka | Aug 2008 | S |
D575401 | Hixson et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
7407078 | Shelton, IV et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
D582038 | Swoyer et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
7488319 | Yates | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500975 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
D617900 | Kingsley et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617901 | Unger et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617902 | Twomey et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617903 | Unger et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D618798 | Olson et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
7758577 | Nobis et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
D621503 | Otten et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
7819872 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
D627462 | Kingsley | Nov 2010 | S |
D628289 | Romero | Nov 2010 | S |
D628290 | Romero | Nov 2010 | S |
D630324 | Reschke | Jan 2011 | S |
D649249 | Guerra | Nov 2011 | S |
D649643 | Allen, IV et al. | Nov 2011 | S |
D661394 | Romero et al. | Jun 2012 | S |
9724116 | Kerr et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10675046 | Kerr et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20030018331 | Dycus et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030229344 | Dycus et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20060064113 | Nakao | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070213711 | Eder et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080009854 | Yates | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015575 | Odom et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20110082456 | Welt | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20130245623 | Twomey | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130247343 | Horner et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253489 | Nau, Jr. et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130255063 | Hart et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130267948 | Kerr et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130267949 | Kerr | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274736 | Garrison | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282010 | McKenna et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289561 | Waaler et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130296856 | Unger et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296922 | Allen, IV et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201299462 | Sep 2009 | CN |
2415263 | Oct 1975 | DE |
02514501 | Oct 1976 | DE |
2627679 | Jan 1977 | DE |
03423356 | Jun 1986 | DE |
03612646 | Apr 1987 | DE |
3627221 | Feb 1988 | DE |
8712328 | Feb 1988 | DE |
04303882 | Feb 1995 | DE |
04403252 | Aug 1995 | DE |
19515914 | Jul 1996 | DE |
19506363 | Aug 1996 | DE |
29616210 | Nov 1996 | DE |
19608716 | Apr 1997 | DE |
19751106 | May 1998 | DE |
19738457 | Mar 1999 | DE |
19751108 | May 1999 | DE |
19946527 | Jul 2001 | DE |
20121161 | Apr 2002 | DE |
10045375 | Oct 2002 | DE |
202007009165 | Aug 2007 | DE |
202007009317 | Aug 2007 | DE |
202007009318 | Aug 2007 | DE |
10031773 | Nov 2007 | DE |
202007016233 | Jan 2008 | DE |
102004026179 | Jan 2009 | DE |
102008018406 | Jul 2009 | DE |
1281878 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1159926 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1769766 | Apr 2007 | EP |
61501068 | May 1986 | JP |
1024051 | Jan 1989 | JP |
1147150 | Jun 1989 | JP |
65502328 | Mar 1992 | JP |
55106 | Jan 1993 | JP |
540112 | Feb 1993 | JP |
6121797 | May 1994 | JP |
6285078 | Oct 1994 | JP |
06343644 | Dec 1994 | JP |
6511401 | Dec 1994 | JP |
07265328 | Oct 1995 | JP |
08056955 | Mar 1996 | JP |
08252263 | Oct 1996 | JP |
8289895 | Nov 1996 | JP |
8317934 | Dec 1996 | JP |
8317936 | Dec 1996 | JP |
9000538 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09010223 | Jan 1997 | JP |
9122138 | May 1997 | JP |
10000195 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10155798 | Jun 1998 | JP |
1147149 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11070124 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11169381 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11192238 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11244298 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000102545 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000135222 | May 2000 | JP |
2000342599 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2000350732 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001003400 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001008944 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001029355 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001029356 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001128990 | May 2001 | JP |
2001190564 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002136525 | May 2002 | JP |
2002528166 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003116871 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003175052 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003245285 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004517668 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004528869 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005152663 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005253789 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005312807 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006015078 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006501939 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006095316 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2011125195 | Jun 2011 | JP |
6030945 | Nov 2016 | JP |
401367 | Oct 1973 | SU |
0036986 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0059392 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0115614 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0154604 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0245589 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2006021269 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2005110264 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2008040483 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2011018154 | Feb 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Int'l Search Report EP 09 003813.4 dated Aug. 3, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 004491.8 dated Sep. 9, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 005575.7 dated Sep. 9, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 152267.2 dated Jun. 15, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 152898.4 dated Jun. 10, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 154850.3 dated Jul. 20, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 160476.9 dated Aug. 4, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 09 164903.8 dated Aug. 21, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US98/18640 dated Jan. 29, 1999. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US98/23950 dated Jan. 14, 1999. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US98/24281 dated Feb. 22, 1999. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US99/24869 dated Feb. 3, 2000. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11218 dated Aug. 14, 2001. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11224 dated Nov. 13, 2001. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11340 dated Aug. 16, 2001. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US01/11420 dated Oct. 16, 2001. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US02/01890 dated Jul. 25, 2002. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US02/11100 dated Jul. 16, 2002. |
Int'l Search Report PCTTUS03/28534dated Dec. 19, 2003. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US04/03436 dated Mar. 3, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US04/13273 dated Dec. 15, 2004. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US04/15311dated Jan. 12, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US07/021438 dated Apr. 1, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US07/021440 dated Apr. 8, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US08/61498 dated Sep. 22, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report PCT/US09/032690 dated Jun. 16, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 04027479.7 dated Mar. 8, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 04027705.5 dated Feb. 3, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 04752343.6 dated Jul. 20, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05002671.5 dated Dec. 22, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05002674.9 dated Jan. 16, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05013463.4 dated Oct. 7, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05013895.7 dated Oct. 21, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05016399.7 dated Jan. 13, 2006. |
Intl Search Report EP 05017281.6 dated Nov. 24, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05019130.3 dated Oct. 27, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05019429.9 dated May 6, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05020665.5 dated Feb. 27, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05020666.3 dated Feb. 27, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05021197.8 dated Feb. 20, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05021779.3 dated Feb. 2, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05021780.1 dated Feb. 23, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05021937.7 dated Jan. 23, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report—extended—EP 05021937.7 dated Mar. 15, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 05023017.6 dated Feb. 24, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06002279.5 dated Mar. 30, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06005185.1 dated May 10, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06006716.2 dated Aug. 4, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06008515.6 dated Jan. 8, 2009. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06008779.8 dated Jul. 13, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06014461.5 dated Oct. 31, 2006. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06020574.7 dated Oct. 2, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06020583.8 dated Feb. 7, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06020584.6 dated Feb. 1, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06020756.0 dated Feb. 16, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06 024122.1 dated Apr. 16, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 06024123.9 dated Mar. 6, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 001480.8 dated Apr. 19, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 001488.1 dated Jun. 5, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 009026.1 dated Oct. 8, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report Extended—EP 07 009029.5 dated Jul. 20, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 009321.6 dated Aug. 28, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 010672.9 dated Oct. 16, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 013779.9 dated Oct. 26, 2007. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 014016 dated Jan. 28, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 015191.5 dated Jan. 23, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 015601.3 dated Jan. 4, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 020283.3 dated Feb. 5, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 021646.0 dated Mar. 20, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 021646.0 dated Jul. 9, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 07 021647.8 dated May 2, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 08 002692.5 dated Dec. 12, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 08 004655.0 dated Jun. 24, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 08 006732.5 dated Jul. 29, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 08 006917.2 dated Jul. 3, 2008. |
Int'l Search Report EP 08 016539.2 dated Jan. 8, 2009. |
Tinkcler L.F., “Combined Diathermy and Suction Forceps”, Feb. 6, 1967 (Feb. 6, 1965), British Medical Journal Feb. 6, 1976, vol. 1, nr. 5431 p. 361, ISSN: 0007-1447. |
Burdette et al. “In Vivo Probe Measurement Technique for Determining Dielectric Properties at VHF Through Microwave Frequencies”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-28, No. 4, Apr. 1980 pp. 414-427. |
Benaron et al., “Optical Time-of-Flight and Absorbance Imaging of Biologic Media”, Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, vol. 259, Mar. 5, 1993, pp. 1463-1466. |
Michael Choti, “Abdominoperineal Resection with the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System and LigaSure Atlas 20 cm Open Instrument” Innovations That Work, Jun. 2003. |
Chung et al., “Clinical Experience of Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum vol. 46, No. 1 Jan. 2003. |
Carbonell et al., “Comparison of theGyrus PlasmaKinectic Sealer and the Valleylab LigaSure Device in the Hemostasis of Small, Medium, and Large-Sized Arteries” Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte,NC; Date: Aug. 2003. |
Peterson et al., “Comparison of Healing Process Following Ligation with Sutures and Bipolar Vessel Sealing” Surgical Technology International (2001). |
“Electrosurgery: A Historical Overview” Innovations in Electrosurgery; Sales-Product Literature; Dec. 31, 2000. |
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealing Device in Hemorrhoidectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004. |
E. David Crawford, “Evaluation of a New Vessel Sealing Device in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hemorrhoidectormy” American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinicla Congress Poster (2000). |
Muller et al. “Extended Left Hemicolectomy Using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System” Innovations That Work; Sep. 1999. |
Kennedy et al. “High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing” Surgical Endoscopy (1998) 12:876-878. |
Carus et al., “Initial Experience With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Abdominal Surgery” Innovations That Work,Jun. 2002. |
Heniford et al. “Initial Research and Clinical Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Oct. 1999. |
Heniford et al “Initial Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Surgical Endoscopy (2000) 15:799-801. |
Herman et al., “Laparoscopic Intestinal Resection With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: A Case Report”; Innovations That Work, Feb. 2002. |
Koyle et al., “Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocele Ligation in Children and Adolescents” Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, vol. 6, No. 1, 2002. |
W. Scott Helton, “LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: Revolutionary Hemostasis Product for General Surgery”; Sales/Product Literature 1999. |
LigaSure Vessel Sealing System, the Seal of Confidence in General, Gynecologic, Urologic, and Laparaoscopic Surgery; Sales/Product Literature; Apr. 2002. |
Joseph Ortenberg “LigaSure System Used in Laparoscopic 1st and 2nd Stage Orchiopexy” Innovations That Work, Nov. 2002. |
Sigel et al., “The Mechanism of Blood Vessel Closure by High Frequency Electrocoagulation” Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics, Oct. 1965 pp. 823-831. |
Sampayan et al, “Multilayer Ultra-High Gradient Insulator Technology” Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 1998. Netherlands Aug. 17-21, 1998; vol. 2, pp. 740-743. |
Paul G. Horgan, “A Novel Technique for Parenchymal Division During Hepatectomy” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, No. 3, Apr. 2001 pp. 236-237. |
Olsson et al. “Radical Cystectomy in Females”. Current Surgical Techniques in Urology, vol. 14, Issue 3, 2001. |
Palazzo et al. “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy” British Journal of Surgery 2002, 89, 154-157. |
Levy et al. “Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 102, No. 1, Jul. 2003. |
“Reducing Needlestick Injuries in the Operating Room”; Sales/Product Literature 2001. |
Bergdahl et al., “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” J. Neurosurg, vol. 75, Jul. 1991, pp. 148-151. |
Strasberg et al. “A Phase I Study of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hepatic Surgery” Section of HPB Surger, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, Presented at AHPBA, Feb. 2001. |
Sayfan et al., “Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy: A New Technique” Annals of Surgery, vol. 234, No. 1, Jul. 2001, pp. 21-24. |
Levy et al., “Update on Hysterectomy—New Technologies and Techniques” OBG Management, Feb. 2003. |
Dulemba et al. “Use of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealer in Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004. |
Strasberg et al., “Use of a Bipolar Vessel-Sealing Device for Parenchymal Transection During Liver Surgery” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 6, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2002 pp. 569-574. |
Sengupta et al., “Use of a Computer-Controlled Bipolar Diathermy System in Radical Prostatectomies and Other Open Urological Surgery” ANZ Journal of Surgery (2001)71.9 pp. 538-540. |
Rothenberg et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children” Int'l Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) 2000. |
Crawford et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Urologic Cancer Surgery”; Grand Rounds in Urology 1999 vol. 1 Issue 4 pp. 10-17. |
Craig Johnson, “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Bloodless Hemorrhoidectomy”; Innovations That Work, Mar. 2000. |
Levy et al. “ Use of a New Energy-based Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy”; Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) World Congress 1999. |
Barbara Levy, “Use of a New Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” FIGO 2000, Washington, D.C . . . . |
E. David Crawford, “Use of a Novel Vessel Sealing Technology in Management of the Dorsal Veinous Complex” Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Jarrett et al., “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System for Peri-Hilar Vessels in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy”; Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Crouch et al. “A Velocity-Dependent Model for Needle Insertion in Soft Tissue”; MICCAI 2005; LNCS 3750 pp. 624-632, Dated: 2005. |
McLellan et al., “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Pelvic Surgery” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics FIGO World Congress 2000, Washington, DC. |
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Gynecologic Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 1999. |
Int'l Search Report EP 98944778.4 dated Oct. 31, 2000. |
Int'l Search Report EP 98957771 dated Aug. 9, 2001. |
Int'l Search Report EP 98958575.7 dated Sep. 20, 2002. |
Intl Search Report EP 04013772.1 dated Apr. 1, 2005. |
Int'l Search Report EP 04027314.6 dated Mar. 10, 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200297368 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15665722 | Aug 2017 | US |
Child | 16896691 | US | |
Parent | 13969278 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 15665722 | US | |
Parent | 12574292 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 13969278 | US |