1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a jaw set used in demolition and recycling equipment. More particularly, the present invention relates to a jaw set having serrated blade inserts to provide for efficient cutting of wire cable, small diameter pipe, and the like.
2. Description of Related Art
While the present invention relates to demolition and recycling equipment, this equipment is also referred to as construction equipment and scrap handling/processing equipment. The description of demolition equipment, recycling equipment, scrap handling equipment, or construction equipment is not intended to be restrictive to the equipment being referenced.
In the dismantling of an industrial site, wire cable and small diameter pipes are often encountered.
A second jaw blade 70 extends from a front end 75 of the second jaw 30 to a back end 80 of the second jaw 30 proximate to the rotational axis RA.
The first jaw blade 40 and the second jaw blade 70 have mounted therein blade inserts having smooth surfaces as illustrated in
While this configuration is capable of cutting small diameter pipe P and, additionally, wire cable, as illustrated for pipe in
A design is needed to provide for more efficient cutting of small diameter pipes and wire cable by utilizing a greater portion of the first jaw blade and the second jaw blade.
The subject invention is directed to a jaw set for demolition equipment, wherein the jaw set is made up of a first jaw and a second jaw and, wherein at least one jaw rotates relative to the other jaw about a rotational axis. The jaw set comprises a first jaw blade extending from a front end of the first jaw to a back end of the first jaw proximate to the rotational axis, wherein the first jaw blade has a front section and a rear section forming an obtuse angle relative to the front section defining an apex therebetween. At least one blade insert is secured to each of the front section and the rear section of the first blade, wherein each blade insert has a longitudinal axis extending along the length of each insert. At least one blade insert of the front section has a cutting surface with grooves spaced along the longitudinal axis to provide a serrated cutting surface. A second jaw blade extends from a front end of the second jaw to a back end of the second jaw proximate to the rotational axis. At least one blade insert is secured to a section of the second blade, wherein each blade insert has a longitudinal axis extending along the length of each insert. At least one blade insert of the section has a cutting surface with grooves spaced along the longitudinal axis to provide a serrated cutting surface. In a closed position, the cutting surface of the blade insert of the front section of the first jaw forms an acute angle with the cutting surface of the blade insert of the section of the second jaw blade.
In a second embodiment of the subject invention, a blade insert for use with jaws for demolition equipment has a generally rectangular body with a longitudinal axis extending thereon and a width extending thereacross. Each blade is comprised of a top side having a cutting surface. The cutting surface has grooves extending thereacross with planar surfaces therebetween. Bolt holes extend through the width of the blade and are positioned along the longitudinal axis at a location spaced from that of the grooves to provide maximum strength to the blade.
The inventors have discovered that by changing the configuration of the blade inserts in the jaw set, it is possible to cause the cutting of a small diameter pipe or a wire cable to occur at different locations along the first jaw blade and the second jaw blade and to minimize or prevent the cutting of such items at the apex location. By utilizing different areas of the first jaw blade and the second jaw blade for cutting, not only is the blade wear at the apex minimized or eliminated, but, furthermore, by distributing the cutting along different parts of the jaw blades, the life of the blade inserts may be significantly extended while, at the same time, maintaining a high quality cut. The modification of the subject invention relative to the prior art is the substitution of one or more blade inserts within the jaw blades to provide serrated blade inserts as opposed to smooth blade inserts. In particular, the inventors have discovered that by providing serrated blade inserts within the first jaw blade and the second jaw blade, the small diameter pipe or the wire cable is essentially grabbed and not permitted to slide along the jaw blade to the apex. Additionally, such a configuration may be more effective in cutting larger structural steel because the serrated blade inserts cause the steel to yield before the part is cut, thereby reducing the force needed to sever the part.
Directing attention to
Directing attention to
The jaw set 20 is made up of a first jaw blade 40 extending from a front end 45 of the first jaw 25 to a back end 50 proximate to the rotational axis RA. The first jaw blade 40 has a front section 55 and a rear section 60 forming an obtuse angle A relative to the front section 55 defining an apex 65 therebetween.
At least one blade insert 100 is secured to the front section 55 of the first jaw blade 40 and at least one blade insert 105 is secured to the rear section 60 of the first jaw blade 40. Each blade insert has a longitudinal axis L extending along the length of that insert.
Directing attention to
Returning to
The blade inserts 120, 125 have similar features as those associated with blade insert 100 and, as a result, the blade insert 100, previously discussed with respect to
Directing attention again to
Of particular importance with respect to the subject invention,
As illustrated in
As further illustrated in
Directing attention to
Directing attention to
As a general guideline, the groove length L2 may be at least twice the depth of the groove depth D.
As illustrated again in
While it was previously mentioned that the bolt holes 135a, 135b, 135c are intentionally positioned away from the grooves 115a, 115b, 115c, 115d, it should be appreciated that the length of the planar sections 130a, for example, may vary to permit the bolt holes 135a, 135b, 135c to be offset from the grooves 115a, 115b, 115c, 115d.
The invention is also directed to a blade insert 100 for use with jaws for demolition equipment, wherein the blade insert 100, as illustrated in
Directing attention to
It should also be apparent from inspection of
It has been found that the serrated blade inserts of the subject invention cut 80-90% longer than the traditional smooth blades before requiring blade rotation to a new edge. This benefit does not factor in the further extended blade life that can be achieved by sharpening and shimming.
An added benefit of the serrated blade inserts occurs during the cutting operation, wherein the blade inserts progressively saw through the wire cable in the same fashion as a hack saw blade cuts, rather than trying to sever the cable, like chopping at something with a dull axe. While the sharp shear blade edge of the cutting insert does cut the cable, the cutting action is further implemented because the serrated blade insert utilizes a tearing or shredding action rather than complete shearing or snipping. Additionally, serrated blades weaken the structural integrity of wire cable by unraveling it, while simultaneously shredding the strands, which enable the blades to cut the cable with far less effort, thus minimizing overall wear and tear to the blades and all of the other shear components.
When cutting small diameter pipe, the smooth, traditional blade inserts gather and bunch the material, forcing the jaw to cut a mass of material all at once in the region of the apex. In contrast, utilizing the serrated blade inserts, smaller diameter material is trapped at various notches along each of the blades, sequentially spreading out the strands of the cable, thus using a fraction of the energy to cut the same material volume, resulting in longer blade life, less stress on the blade bolts, and overall lower maintenance.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4519135 | LaBounty | May 1985 | A |
4670983 | Ramun et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4838493 | LaBounty | Jun 1989 | A |
4951886 | Berto | Aug 1990 | A |
5044569 | LaBounty et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5060378 | LaBounty et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5301882 | Morikawa et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5361999 | Sakato et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5474242 | Rafn | Dec 1995 | A |
RE35432 | LaBounty et al. | Jan 1997 | E |
5822893 | Ostermeyer | Oct 1998 | A |
5926958 | Ramun | Jul 1999 | A |
5940971 | Ramun | Aug 1999 | A |
6061911 | LaBounty et al. | May 2000 | A |
6202308 | Ramun | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6766973 | Muri | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6839969 | Jacobson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6926217 | LaBounty et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7121489 | Ramun | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7284718 | Christenson | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7354010 | Ramun et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7578461 | Sederberg et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7971816 | Andrina | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20030132327 | Muri | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20060131454 | Ramun et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070001041 | Christenson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070006439 | Ramun | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070245568 | Schipp et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080263870 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2008 | A2 |
20110031338 | Ramun et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110068205 | Ramun | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4417832 | Nov 1994 | DE |
0384872 | Aug 1990 | EP |
58128258 | Aug 1983 | JP |
63111550 | Jul 1988 | JP |
4183516 | Jun 1992 | JP |
2001327882 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2004176536 | Jun 2004 | JP |
0128687 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0168992 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2004044349 | May 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130270379 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |