Jet mill micronizers are commonly used to reduce the particle size of friable material to the micron range. Typical jet mill micronizers feed the friable material into a vortex created by injection of a fluid such as compressed air, gas or steam through a nozzle into the micronizer. The vortex entrains the friable material and accelerates it to a high speed. Subsequent particle on particle impacts within the micronizer create increasingly smaller particles, with particles of the desired size ultimately moving to the center of the micronizer where they exit through a vortex finder.
The efficiency of the micronizer is dictated by the ability to properly entrain the friable material within the jet stream created by the injected gas. Over the years, the industry has attempted to improve the entrainment of the particles through changes in nozzle design as well as through recirculation devices incorporated into the micronizer. While such efforts have met with limited success, they frequently rely upon complicated designs subject to wear and increased maintenance.
One attempt to improve the efficiency of a micronizer resulted in the development and use of the now standard convergent-divergent nozzles. Converging-diverging nozzles generate extremely high velocity gaseous streams commonly achieving supersonic velocities. However, because the gaseous streams expand within the nozzle, entrainment of particles within the resulting jet is difficult. Thus, the benefits of the supersonic velocity are not generally imparted to the friable material.
High pressure steam is commonly used to generate the micronizing jet when milling titanium dioxide particles to pigmentary size. In view of the energy costs associated with steam generation, improved entrainment efficiencies can lead to significant cost savings during the TiO2 pigment manufacturing process. The quantity of steam used during the TiO2 micronization process, for example, is typically quite substantial, generally varying between about 0.5 to greater than two tons per ton of pigment.
In view of the significant energy costs associated with steam jet mills, it would be desirable to provide an improved jet nozzle which enhances entrainment of particles to be milled. Preferably, such improvements would be provided without significant design changes to the micronizer. Further, it would be even more beneficial if the changes enabling the improved operations of the micronizer could be readily retrofitted to existing units. The current invention, as described herein, provides for each of the above needs through an improved micronizer jet nozzle.
The current invention provides an improved jet nozzle for use in a micronizing jet mill. The nozzle of the current invention includes a nozzle body having a passageway extending from a first open end to a second open end suitable for forming a gaseous jet. Located within the passageway is a Coanda effect inducing element. Preferably, the Coanda effect inducing element extends outwardly from the exit (second end) of the passageway.
In another embodiment, the current invention provides an improved jet nozzle for use in a micronizing jet mill. The jet nozzle has a nozzle body with a conduit passing through the length of the nozzle body providing a passageway for generating a gaseous jet. The exit point of the nozzle forming the gaseous jet preferably has a slot-like design. Positioned within the passageway and preferably extending outwards from the exit point of the passageway is a Coanda effect inducing element. Preferably, the Coanda effect inducing element has a configuration corresponding to the slot-like exit of the passageway. Thus, the slot-like exit of the passageway and the Coanda effect inducing element define a generally consistent gap suitable for generating the steam jet.
Still further, the current invention provides an improved jet nozzle for use in a micronizing jet mill. The improved nozzle comprises a nozzle body with a passageway passing the length of the nozzle body for generating a gaseous jet. The exit point of the nozzle has a slot-like design defined by two longer, essentially inwardly hyperbolic sides and two opposing generally rounded ends. Removably positioned within the passageway and preferably extending outwards from the exit point of the passageway is a Coanda effect inducing element. Preferably, the removable Coanda effect inducing element has a configuration corresponding to the slot-like exit of the passageway. Thus, the slot-like exit of the passageway and the Coanda effect inducing element define a generally consistent gap through which the gaseous steam flows to form the jet. While other means may be employed to secure the Coanda effect inducing element in position within the nozzle, the preferred embodiment utilizes a hollow set screw having a passageway running the length of the screw. The screw is inserted into the first end of the jet nozzle following placement of the Coanda effect inducing element within the nozzle, thereby securing the Coanda effect inducing element in position within the nozzle.
In 1910, Henri Coanda first observed a phenomenon wherein a free jet emerging from a nozzle attached itself to a nearby surface. Known as the Coanda effect, this phenomenon is the result of low pressure developing between the free flowing stream of gas and the wall. The Coanda effect can be observed in both liquid and gaseous fluids.
The current invention takes advantage of the Coanda effect to extend a thin layer supersonic zone 31 outward from the jet nozzle 10. As depicted in
Preferred embodiments of the current invention will be described with reference to
Improved jet nozzle 10 of the current invention is depicted in detail in
As depicted in
As the steam jet exits nozzle body 14, it will be attracted to and maintained in close proximity to Coanda effect inducing element 30 by the Coanda effect. Due to the induced Coanda effect, the resulting jet's supersonic zone 31 will be extended outward from nozzle 10 a greater distance than would be true of a jet under the same pressure and temperature conditions, without using Coanda effect inducing element 30.
As shown in
The improved entrainment of particles within supersonic zone 31 is evident from a comparison of
In the preferred embodiment, exit point 26 preferably has a modified slot-like configuration wherein opposing walls 44 and 46 are pinched inwards toward one another, each presenting a generally inwardly hyperbolic shape, with the opposing shorter ends 48 and 50 being generally rounded in configuration. To obtain maximum efficiency of nozzle 10, Coanda effect inducing element 30 preferably has a configuration which conforms to the configuration of exit point 26. Typically, the conforming configuration extends from exit point 26 into passageway 18 a distance of about ten times (10×) to about twenty times (20×) the width of the air passage or gap 52 defined between the outer surface of Coanda effect inducing element 30 and the inner surface of exit point 26. Thus, if gap 52 is about 0.254 mm (about 0.01″) wide, then the conforming configuration will extend about 2.54 mm to about 10.16 mm (about 0.1″ to about 0.2″) into passageway 18. Alternatively, the conforming configuration may characterize the entire length of Coanda effect inducing element 30 from end 36 to flange 54 or some intermediate distance.
In alternative embodiments, exit point 26 may have a different configuration than depicted in
In a preferred embodiment, Coanda effect inducing element 30 carries a flange 54 suitable for retaining Coanda effect inducing element 30 within passageway 18 by engaging a lip or other similar device (not shown). Following positioning of Coanda effect inducing element 30 within passageway 18, set screw 34 is threaded into nozzle body 14. Although shown as having a fixed position within nozzle body 14, Coanda effect inducing element 30 may be adjustably secured within passageway 18 thereby allowing fine tuning of micronizer 5 for changes in operating conditions. Methods for adjustably securing Coanda effect inducing element 30 within passageway 18 are well known to those skilled in the art and will typically use a solenoid or stepper motor operating in a manner similar to an idle air control valve commonly found a modern fuel injected engine.
In addition to the benefits depicted by
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated for the purpose of the present disclosure, other embodiments of the current invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of this specification, the drawings or practice of the invention disclosed herein. Thus, the foregoing disclosure will enable the construction of a wide variety of apparatus within the scope of the following claims. Accordingly, the foregoing specification is considered merely exemplary of the current invention with the true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/047707 | 12/14/2006 | WO | 00 | 6/11/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/073094 | 6/19/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2052869 | Coanda | Sep 1936 | A |
3240254 | Hughes | Mar 1966 | A |
3302887 | Holmes et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
3713590 | Dorschner et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
4018388 | Andrews | Apr 1977 | A |
4155850 | Rathbone et al. | May 1979 | A |
4184636 | Bauer | Jan 1980 | A |
4248387 | Andrews | Feb 1981 | A |
4252512 | Kornylak | Feb 1981 | A |
4300033 | Scarton et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4302134 | Johnson, Jr. et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4339081 | Lindqvist | Jul 1982 | A |
4344479 | Bailey | Aug 1982 | A |
4370538 | Browning | Jan 1983 | A |
4458729 | Brouwer et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4484710 | Rozniecki | Nov 1984 | A |
4489825 | Gladish | Dec 1984 | A |
4531592 | Hayatdavoudi | Jul 1985 | A |
4550823 | Gladish | Nov 1985 | A |
4558822 | Nieuwkamp et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4621684 | Delahunty | Nov 1986 | A |
4687079 | Gladish | Aug 1987 | A |
4691745 | Takekawa et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
5016823 | Kato et al. | May 1991 | A |
5135167 | Ringer | Aug 1992 | A |
5347805 | Butzke et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5423490 | Zampini | Jun 1995 | A |
5628464 | Smith et al. | May 1997 | A |
5683039 | Leute et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5732893 | Nied | Mar 1998 | A |
5749525 | Stouffer | May 1998 | A |
5849453 | Mikuriya et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5895869 | Von Behrens et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5983735 | Von Behrens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6123542 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6142425 | Armanios et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6210151 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6276924 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6408866 | Carver et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6709630 | Cameron et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6780917 | Hashimoto et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6826910 | Easton | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6942170 | Casalmir et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951312 | Casalmir et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6976507 | Webb et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7334427 | Ozaki et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7354029 | Rutstein | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7404416 | Schultz et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7438245 | Kawamoto et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
20050072866 | Petit | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060151641 | Li | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 573 933 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0 894 026 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1 300 445 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1 316 621 | Jun 2003 | EP |
0 999 411 | Nov 2004 | EP |
639762 | Jul 1950 | GB |
1 543 371 | Apr 1979 | GB |
2 006 148 | May 1979 | GB |
2 009 624 | Jun 1979 | GB |
2 035 846 | Jun 1980 | GB |
2 038 209 | Jul 1980 | GB |
2 065 505 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2 125 710 | Mar 1984 | GB |
2 276 708 | Oct 1994 | GB |
S63-205159 | Aug 1988 | JP |
H06-285384 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H11-319674 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-093831 | Apr 2000 | JP |
WO 8000368 | Mar 1980 | WO |
WO 0019881 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 2008073094 | Jun 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dattus™ fM Meter Technical Reference Guide, Actaris metering systems, Chapter 2, p. 2-1, publisher and date unknown. |
Sturtevant, Inc., “Jet Mill Micronizer by Sturtevant,” (2004). |
Sturtevant, Inc., “Sanitary Design Micronizer” (2005). |
Moore Process Automation Solutions, “Flowmeters,” pp. 305-319, undated but admitted to be prior art, discovered in Oct. 2006. |
IPRP for PCT/US2006/47707, completed Oct. 29, 2009, Tronox LLC. |
European Search Report mailed Dec. 12, 2010 in Applicant's corresponding European application, Application No. 06845418.0. |
First Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2011 in Applicant's corresponding Chinese application, application No. 200680056641.2. |
Written Opinion mailed Nov. 19, 2010 in Applicant's corresponding Singapore application, Application No. 200903961-1. |
Examination Report mailed May 8, 2012 in Applicant's corresponding Singapore application, Application No. 200903961-1. |
Examiner's First Report, mailed Dec. 6, 2010 in Applicant's corresponding Australian application, Application No. 2006351884. |
Notice of Acceptance mailed Jul. 27, 2011 in Applicant's corresponding Australian application, Application No. 2006351884. |
Second office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2012 in Applicant's corresponding Chinese application, application No. 200680056641.2 (and English translation). |
Substantive Examination Adverse Report mailed Sep. 28, 2012 in Applicant's corresponding Malaysian application, Application No. PI 20092366. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100025502 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |