This invention relates generally to the subsea burial of products such as pipelines, umbilicals and power cables and more particularly concerns the use of jetting systems to bury and protect these products in soft and loose materials, such as soft and medium stiffness clays and in sands and silts.
In most conventional jetting systems, one or more high-pressure water-jetting swords are used to excavate a trench. The jetting creates a mix of water and excavated soil and, assuming continuance of a super-critical density of the resulting mix, the product will fall by gravity to the trench floor.
However, as the mix of water and soil begins to settle, its density increases and descent of the product gradually slows. At critical density product descent ceases, often significantly before the product has reached the floor of the trench. In the sub-critical density range that follows, the settling soil solidifies under and around the stabilized product. The product never reaches its desired depth in the trench.
Also, while the pipelines, umbilicals and power cables buried using jetting system techniques do have inherent stiffness, they tend to bend under their own weight to natural minimum bend radii exceeding two meters. The greater the bending radii, the longer the time required for the product to reach the desired depth and the greater the likelihood that reaching critical density will occur before the product reaches the trench floor.
A common response to the critical density dilemma is the use of expensive, very-high-powered jetting systems, consuming as much as two megawatts of power, in an effort to increase the speed of advance of the jetting system along the product path, allowing the product to fall to the trench bottom more rapidly. This is somewhat palatable given that increased trenching speeds reduce total trenching time. But, while maximum trenchers speeds are desirable, there are many factors which, alone or in concert, limit the possibilities of increasing, and may even result in decreasing, trenching speeds in any specific application.
Furthermore, in hard soils and gravels, the jets take significant time to do their work. En route variations in the soil quality, such as mixed soils with different super-critical and sub-critical properties, soils that are both horizontally and vertically stratified, changes in the types of soil and competent soils supporting the products ahead of the jetting swords, all complicate maximizing trenching speed. Maximum speeds of the trencher tracks, the power available to the tracks and the water power available to the system all cap the possible trenching speed. For any or all of these reasons, achievement of sufficient speed to permit backfill at super-critical density cannot be assured with known jetting systems.
Known alternatives to the increasing-trenching-speed solution include the use of multiple passes of the jet system to lower the product in stages, the use of suction devices to remove the water and soil mix from the trench and directing some of the jets of the swords backwards to keep the water and soil mix at as low a density as possible. Multi-pass systems increase time and cost. Adding devices increases cost and complexity. Redirecting jets diminishes the cutting forces applied by the system and slows progress along the product path.
Other problems with presently known jetting systems include their mass which is typically in a range of 15,000 kg and requires sophisticated launch and recovery equipment, their high sensitivity to weather, their reliance on delicate equipment which makes repair difficult and time consuming, and their multiple lift lines, hoses and control umbilicals which can lead to entanglement with, and loss of control of, the trencher.
It is, therefore, an object of this invention to provide a jetting system which maintains the water and soil mix at a super-critical density for longer distances behind the jetting swords. Another object of this invention is to provide a jetting system which facilitates rapid descent of the product in the trench. It is also an object of this invention to provide a jetting system which increases the likelihood of the product reaching its desired depth in the trench. A further object of this invention is to provide a jetting system which permits the advance of the jetting system along the product path at lower speeds. And it is an object of this invention to provide a jetting system which reduces the need for multiple passes of the jetting system to lower the product in stages, suction devices to remove the water and soil mix from the trench and/or redirection of some of the jets of the swords backwards to keep the water and soil mix at as low a density as possible.
In accordance with the invention, a jetting system for an undersea trencher has a chassis with one or more jetting swords extending downward from chassis. Liquid under pressure is applied to the jetting swords. A jetting conduit extends aftward from at least one of the jetting swords. Each jetting conduit receives liquid under pressure, preferably from its sword but possibly from another source. A plurality of nozzles displaced along the length of each jetting conduit redirect the liquid radially into the trench being excavated by the jetting swords. Preferably, joints connecting the swords and corresponding conduits articulate in a vertical plane.
The joints may be remotely controlled. The conduits may be flexible or rigid with at least one articulating joint in the conduit. Each of the conduit joints may independently articulate in either/or horizontal and vertical planes and may be remotely controlled. The jetting conduits, taken together, direct sufficient liquid into the trench to maintain a mix of trenched soil and water in the trench along the length of the conduits at not more than a super-critical density.
Each jetting conduit may be configured to define a vertical frame. The height of each frame extends from a first longitudinal axis through a lower end of its corresponding sword to a second longitudinal axis through an upper portion of its corresponding sword. The length of each frame is predetermined to maintain the mix of trenched soil and water of the in the portion of the trench commensurate with the frame length at not more than a super-critical density. In the case of a two sword system, a member may space the trailing ends of the frames at a distance substantially equal to the space between the swords. Opposing side walls may be defined by the opposing frames. A top wall may be defined by aft portions of opposed upper trailing portions of the frames.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
While the invention will be described in connection with a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to those embodiments or to the details of the construction or arrangement of parts illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
Looking first at
As shown, the swords D are inclined aftward below the trencher A. Their angle of inclination may be variable to permit changes in the attack angle of their nozzles during trenching and/or to adjust the trench depth reached by the swords D. The swords D may also be retractable and extendable during trenching to permit variation of the trench depth.
Forward nozzles G are oriented in the jetting swords D to jet high volumes of water at high pressure in a forward direction and cut the leading end H of the trench F. Transverse nozzles I may be oriented in the jetting swords D to jet water toward their opposite swords D and maintain spacing of the swords D during trenching. Aft nozzles J may be oriented in the jetting swords D to jet water at lower pressure into the mix K and maintain its density immediately trailing the swords D.
Looking at
Continuing to look at
Turning now to
However, looking at
As best seen in
As seen in
The jetting swords 30 may be independently supplied with water under high pressure or, as seen in
Looking at
In
In
In
The numbers of segments 65 and types of connecting joints 67 and 69 can be varied to accommodate most anticipated trench contours in a given trenching application.
Alternatively, looking at
Turning now to
One or more transverse members 89 may be mounted between the upper horizontal 85 and aft vertical 83 portions of the jetting conduits 50 of opposed jetting swords 30 to maintain the space 91 between their respective jetting conduits 50 substantially the same as the space between the swords 30. The members 89 must be configured and located so that the product P will pass between the swords 30 and below the spacing members 89. A sidewall may be provided in the area defined by each of the rigid frame jetting conduits 81, 83, 85 to prevent decomposition of the sides of the trench F by the jetting of the nozzles 51 and also to prevent loosened soil along the sides of the trench F from penetrating and increasing the density of the super-critical mix 25. A top wall may also be provided so long as the front top area through which product P must pass remains unobstructed.
Regardless of whether rigid or flexible jetting conduit 50 is used, the free end 73 of a jetting conduit 51 may be open, closed (as shown) or controlled by a remotely operated shutoff valve. If, for example, during trenching, a need for greater length of super-critical mix 25 arises, a capped conduit end might be opened to meet the need. Whether rigid or flexible, the jetting conduit 50 may be made of any suitable material, metal or plastic, provided the strength and flexibility of the resulting conduit 50 is suited to the necessities of the particular trenching application. Steel conduit may have sufficient elasticity for the bends required in some applications while plastic conduit may have sufficient rigidity for other applications.
Nozzles for jetting swords are well known and can be used for the jetting conduits 50. The nozzles 51 of the jetting conduits 50 are typically independently angled to flow water upwards and towards the opposite trench wall, preferably directed toward the center of the desired volume of the super-critical density mix 25. However, the number, size, spacing and discharge vectors of the nozzles 51 can be empirically determined to suit the particular trenching application. The high pressure water discharge of the jetting conduits 50 will serve to keep the trench F open, maintain the mix 23 of water and excavated soil at super-critical densities 25 for greater lengths and also sustain the separation of the lower ends 39 of the swords 30.
If the source 22 of water at high pressure is connected to the trencher 20 by high strength flexible hose, the hose can also serve as the trencher lift line. It is further anticipated that the trencher 20 can be served by a detachable remote operating vehicle (ROV) and, therefore, be launched and retrieved via a chute or stern roller of a relatively small transporting vessel, reducing greatly the cost of the launch and recovery system (LARS). Assuming the availability of a suitable flexible jetting conduit 50, chute or stern roller launch and recovery might be achieved without need for an articulating joint 37 between the jetting sword 30 and the jetting conduit 50. It is also anticipated that high strength flexible hose can be employed as the launch and recovery lines. Reducing the number of lift, launch and recovery lines serving the trencher 20 reduces the risks of entanglement and loss of control.
Thus, it is apparent that there is been provided, in accordance with the invention, an improved jetting system that fully satisfies the objects, aims and advantages set forth above. While the invention has been described in conjunction with a specific embodiment thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art and in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations as fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation application claiming priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/683,388 filed Aug. 22, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/976,909 filed Dec. 21, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,745,716.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15683388 | Aug 2017 | US |
Child | 15803403 | US | |
Parent | 14976909 | Dec 2015 | US |
Child | 15683388 | US |