The present invention generally relates to jewelry clasps, and in particular, to a clasp having complementary closed portions adapted to selectively engage at least one chain or bead strand.
Traditionally, a jewelry chest has had to contain a variety of necklaces, bracelets, anklets, and the like, in order to provide jewelry complementary to apparel and suitable for various social functions. As a result, there is a considerable expense associated with buying specialized jewelry articles and, further, the transfer of pendants or beaded sections between articles.
While one can wear multiple strands simultaneously, often a desired appearance with multiple strand wear requires a relative positional relationship therebetween. While a relationship between multiple strands is readily provided at the beginning of the day, it is often the case that a longer strand in a graded strand positional relationship can work around a wearer's neck on top of the other strands and thereby destroy the evenly graduated appearance of the strands. Alternatively, if a pendent or central element of a strand shifts from its initial position, the desired appearance is impaired. Additionally, securing a strand with a conventional clasp is a delicate and time-consuming process that predisposes a wearer to avoid multiple strand jewelry even though the wearer is desirous of the appearance. Thus, there exists a need for a reliable clasp suitable for engaging a variety of beaded strands or chains.
According to one aspect of the invention, a jewelry clasp is provided for supporting a plurality of strands of jewelry each with opposite ends having terminal fasteners. The jewelry clasp includes a first segment and a second segment. The first segment and second segment are selectively connectable to each other, each having a spanner portion with opposite ends and a strand retainer bar extending from at least one of the ends. The strand retainer bars are adapted to selectively couple with the opposite ends of each strand of jewelry for maintaining a desired positional relationship between the plurality of strands of jewelry.
According to another aspect of the invention, the strand retaining bar is subdivided to define a plurality of apertures. Each of the apertures is adapted to allow attachment of at least one terminal fastener therethrough.
According to another aspect of the invention, the apertures have a spaced orientation along the strand retainer bar for maintaining the desired positional relationship between the plurality of strands of jewelry.
The present invention is further illustrated with reference to the accompanying drawings of preferred embodiments. These drawings are not intended to limit the scope of the invention as claimed.
The present invention has utility as a securement for a stranded or chained body ornamentation. While the present invention is described herein with respect to a necklace, it should be appreciated that the present invention is equally well suited for use as a bracelet, belt, anklet or beaded headwear.
The present invention allows one to wear multiple strands simultaneously and retain the positional relationship therebetween. Additionally, the present invention promotes ease of strand securement and further prevents clasp travel during the course of wear to a position where the clasp becomes prominently displayed.
Referring to
Each of the first 12 and second 14 clasp segments has a spanner portion 30 having opposite ends. Strand dual retainer bars 32 extend from at least one of the opposite ends of the spanner portion 30. Preferably, the strand dual retainer bars 32 extend between the opposite ends of the spanner portion 30. Most preferably, the dual strand retaining bars 32 are brazed or otherwise secured to the ends of the spanner portion 30 to form a closed-loop segment. It should be appreciated that a complete segment 12 or 14 is optionally molded from metal or plastic as a unitary piece.
Preferably, the spanner portion 30 extends arcuately between the opposite ends. It should, however, be appreciated that the spanner portion 30 can be formed in a variety of shapes, such as the shape of a “C”, “D”, “U”, a disc, a discoid, a continuous or perforated sheet, and more complex shapes. Additionally, it should be appreciated that the spanner portion can include embossments, inlays and ornamental colorations.
A gap 36 is defined between the spanner portion 30 and the retainer bars 32. The gap 36 is adapted to receive a conventional lobster claw type strand securement 38. The gap 36 separates the retainer bars 32 from the spanner portion 30 at least one point along the length of the retainer bars 32. The closed loop nature of the inventive clasp segment 12, 14 affords greater durability over conventional clasps having selectively openable segments. The strand retaining bars 32, like the spanner portion 30, are readily formed from a variety of materials conventional to the art. These materials illustratively include gold alloys, silver, pewter, brass, platinum, plastic and combinations thereof.
In operation, the inventive clasp is separated into the at least two segments 12, 14 through disengagement of the fastener portions 16, 18. As best shown in
Alternative embodiments of the inventive clasp are shown in
In
In both embodiments of
The invention has been described in an illustrative manner. It is, therefore, to be understood that the terminology used is intended to be in the nature of words of description rather than of limitation. Many modifications and variations of the invention are possible in light of the above teachings. Thus, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described.
This application is a non-provisional application claiming priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/497,278, filed Aug. 22, 2003; the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1380827 | Mullins | Jun 1921 | A |
1813963 | Schick | Jul 1931 | A |
2586758 | Zerr | Feb 1952 | A |
2598597 | Philippe | May 1952 | A |
2615227 | Hornik | Oct 1952 | A |
2644992 | McFarland | Jul 1953 | A |
3098364 | Verri | Jul 1963 | A |
3135031 | Brosse | Jun 1964 | A |
3621651 | Gillespie | Nov 1971 | A |
4000627 | Wahlbeck | Jan 1977 | A |
4382319 | Mones Mendoza | May 1983 | A |
4527316 | Murphy | Jul 1985 | A |
4549411 | Ivey | Oct 1985 | A |
5341659 | Wright | Aug 1994 | A |
5687585 | Ferrell | Nov 1997 | A |
5689867 | Katz | Nov 1997 | A |
5794459 | Ignatowski | Aug 1998 | A |
5893198 | DeCotis | Apr 1999 | A |
6138356 | Hertelendy | Oct 2000 | A |
6308385 | Ball | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6422036 | Giannis et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
20020148251 | Plumly | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030010057 | Hunter | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030110798 | Ignatowski | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040007017 | Flaherty | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040194502 | Ma | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050039487 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60497278 | Aug 2003 | US |