The need for high performance and reliable energy storage in the modern society is well documented. Lithium batteries represent a very attractive solution to these energy needs due to their superior energy density and high performance. However, available Li-ion storage materials limit the specific energy of conventional Li-ion batteries. While lithium has one of the highest specific capacities of any anode (3861 mAh/g), typical cathode materials such as MnO2, V2O5, LiCoO2 and (CF)n have specific capacities less than 200 mAh/g.
Recently, lithium/oxygen (Li/O2) or lithium air batteries have been suggested as a means for avoiding the limitations of today's lithium ion cells. In these batteries, lithium metal anodes are used to maximize anode capacity and the cathode capacity of Li air batteries is maximized by not storing the cathode active material in the battery. Instead, ambient O2 is reduced on a catalytic air electrode to form O22−, where it reacts with Li+ ions conducted from the anode. Aqueous lithium air batteries have been found to suffer from corrosion of the Li anode by water and suffer from less than optimum capacity because of the excess water required for effective operation.
Abraham and Jiang (J. Electrochem. Soc., 1996, 143 (1), 1-5) reported a non-aqueous Li/O2 battery with an open circuit voltage close to 3 V, an operating voltage of 2.0 to 2.8 V, good coulomb efficiency, and some re-chargeability, but with severe capacity fade, limiting the lifetime to only a few cycles. Further, in non-aqueous cells, the electrolyte has to wet the lithium oxygen reaction product in order for it to be electrolyzed during recharge. It has been found that the limited solubility of the reaction product in available organic electrolytes necessitates the use of excess amounts of electrolyte to adequately wet the extremely high surface area nanoscale discharge deposits produced in the cathode. Thus, the required excess electrolyte significantly decreases high energy density that would otherwise be available in lithium oxygen cells.
Operation of Li/O2 cells depends on the diffusion of oxygen into the air cathode. Oxygen absorption is a function of the electrolyte's Bunsen coefficient (α), electrolyte conductivity (σ), and viscosity (η). It is known that as the solvent's viscosity increases, there are decreases in lithium reaction capacity and Bunsen coefficients. Additionally, the electrolyte has an even more direct effect on overall cell capacity as the ability to dissolve reaction product is crucial. This problem has persisted in one form or another in known batteries.
Indeed, high rates of capacity fade remain a problem for non-aqueous rechargeable lithium air batteries and have represented a significant barrier to their commercialization. The high fade is attributed primarily to parasitic reactions occurring between the electrolyte and the mossy lithium powder and dendrites formed at the anode-electrolyte interface during cell recharge, as well as the passivation reactions between the electrolyte and the LiO2 radical which occurs as an intermediate step in reducing Li2O2 during recharge.
During recharge, lithium ions are conducted across the electrolyte separator with lithium being plated at the anode. The recharge process can be complicated by the formation of low density lithium dendrites and lithium powder as opposed to a dense lithium metal film. In addition to passivation reactions with the electrolyte, the mossy lithium formed during recharge can be oxidized in the presence of oxygen into mossy lithium oxide. A thick layer of lithium oxide and/or electrolyte passivation reaction product on the anode can increase the impedance of the cell and thereby lower performance. Formation of mossy lithium with cycling can also result in large amounts of lithium being disconnected within the cell and thereby being rendered ineffective.
Lithium dendrites can penetrate the separator, resulting in internal short circuits within the cell. Repeated cycling causes the electrolyte to break down, in addition to reducing the oxygen passivation material coated on the anode surface. This results in the formation of a layer composed of mossy lithium, lithium-oxide and lithium-electrolyte reaction products at the metal anode's surface which drives up cell impedance and consumes the electrolyte, bringing about cell dry out.
Attempts to use active (non lithium metal) anodes to eliminate dendritic lithium plating have not been successful because of the similarities in the structure of the anode and cathode. In such lithium air “ion” batteries, both the anode and cathode contain carbon or another electronic conductor as a medium for providing electronic continuity. Carbon black in the cathode provides electronic continuity and reaction sites for lithium oxide formation. To form an active anode, graphitic carbon is included in the anode for intercalation of lithium and carbon black is included for electronic continuity. Unfortunately, the use of graphite and carbon black in the anode can also provide reaction sites for lithium oxide formation. At a reaction potential of approximately 3 volts relative to the low voltage of lithium intercalation into graphite, oxygen reactions would dominate in the anode as well as in the cathode. Applying existing lithium ion battery construction techniques to lithium oxygen cells would allow oxygen to diffuse throughout all elements of the cell structure. With lithium/oxygen reactions occurring in both the anode and cathode, creation of a voltage potential differential between the two is difficult. An equal oxidation reaction potential would exist within the two electrodes, resulting in no voltage.
As a solution to the problem of dendritic lithium plating and uncontrolled oxygen diffusion, known aqueous and non-aqueous lithium air batteries have included a barrier electrolyte separator, typically a ceramic material, to protect the lithium anode and provide a hard surface onto which lithium can be plated during recharge. However, formation of a reliable, cost effective barrier has been difficult. A lithium air cell employing a protective solid state lithium ion conductive barrier as a separator to protect lithium in a lithium air cell is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,691,536 of Johnson. Thin film barriers have limited effectiveness in withstanding the mechanical stress associated with stripping and plating lithium at the anode or the swelling and contraction of the cathode during cycling. Moreover, thick lithium ion conductive ceramic plates, while offering excellent protective barrier properties, are extremely difficult to fabricate, add significant mass to the cell, and are rather expensive to make.
As it relates to the cathode, the dramatic decrease in cell capacity as the discharge rate is increased is attributed to the accumulation of reaction product in the cathode. At high discharge rate, oxygen entering the cathode at its surface does not have an opportunity to diffuse or otherwise transition to reaction sites deeper within the cathode. The discharge reactions occur at the cathode surface, resulting in the formation of a reaction product crust that seals the surface of the cathode and prevents additional oxygen from entering. Starved of oxygen, the discharge process cannot be sustained.
Another significant challenge with lithium air cells has been electrolyte stability within the cathode. The primary discharge product in lithium oxygen cells is Li2O2. During recharge, the resulting lithium oxygen radical, LiO2, an intermediate product which occurs while electrolyzing Li2O2, aggressively attacks and decomposes the electrolyte within the cathode, causing it to lose its effectiveness.
High temperature molten salts have been suggested as an alternative to organic electrolytes in non-aqueous lithium-air cells. U.S. Pat. No. 4,803,134 of Sammells describes a high lithium-oxygen secondary cell in which a ceramic oxygen ion conductor is employed. The cell includes a lithium-containing negative electrode in contact with a lithium ion conducting molten salt electrolyte, LiF—LiCl—Li2O, separated from the positive electrode by the oxygen ion conducting solid electrolyte. The ion conductivity limitations of available solid oxide electrolytes require that such a cell be operated in the 700° C. range or higher in order to have reasonable charge/discharge cycle rates. The geometry of the cell is such that the discharge reaction product accumulates within the molten salt between the anode and the solid oxide electrolyte. The required space is an additional source of impedance within the cell.
Molten nitrates also offer a viable solution and the physical properties of molten nitrate electrolytes are summarized in Table 1 (taken from Lithium Batteries Using Molten Nitrate Electrolytes by Melvin H. Miles; Research Department (Code 4T4220D); Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division; China Luke, Calif. 93555-61000).
The electrochemical oxidation of the molten LiNO3 occurs at about 1.1 V vs. Ag+/Ag or 4.5 V vs. Li+/Li. The electrochemical reduction of LiNO3 occurs at about −0.9V vs. Ag+/Ag, and thus these two reactions define a 2.0V electrochemical stability region for molten LiNO3 at 300° C. and are defined as follows:
LiNO3→Li++NO2+½O2+e− (Equation 1)
LiNO3+2e−→LiNO2+O−− (Equation 2)
This work with molten nitrates was not performed with lithium air cells in mind; however, the effective operating voltage window for the electrolyte is suitable for such an application. As indicated by the reaction potential line in
A need remains for a lithium air cell which overcomes problems associated with those of the prior art.
A rechargeable lithium air battery comprises a ceramic separator forming an anode chamber, a molten lithium anode contained in the anode chamber, an air cathode, and a non-aqueous electrolyte, wherein the cathode has a temperature gradient comprising a low temperature region and a high temperature region, and wherein the temperature gradient provides a flow system for reaction product produced by the battery.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of the invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there are shown in the drawings embodiments which are presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
In the drawings:
This invention relates generally to energy storage, and more particularly to a lithium air electrochemical cell. For the purposes of this disclosure, the terms lithium air cell, lithium air electrochemical engine and lithium oxygen battery are used interchangeably.
The present invention provides a rechargeable lithium air cell having a high rate of cell charge/discharge with limited capacity fade, high energy density, high power density, and the ability to operate on oxygen from ambient air. As such, it removes significant barriers that have prevented the commercialization of lithium air cells. For example, the formation of mossy lithium powder and dendrites at the anode-electrolyte interface during cell recharge are eliminated by the use of molten lithium supplied as a flow reactant to the anode side of a stable solid state ceramic electrolyte. The battery according to the invention also includes a flow system for removing reaction product from the cathode.
The reactions of lithium with oxygen are as follows:
2Li+O2→Li2O2 Eo=3.10 V
4Li+O2→2Li2O Eo=2.91V
To avoid problems associated with past approaches to lithium air cells, a lithium air cell according to the invention may be operated at a wide range of temperatures in the range of 20° C. to 700° C., which include elevated temperatures, such as the preferred temperatures of about 200° C. to 450° C., more preferably about 200° to about 250° C. The solvent in the electrolyte may be selected based on the preferred operating temperature of the specific battery. Operation at elevated temperature enables faster kinetics for higher power density, thus eliminating a major issue associated with lithium air technology. Further, operation at elevated temperature also allows for the use of high temperature organic electrolytes and inorganic, molten salt electrolyte solutions that have high electrochemical stability, thus avoiding another of the major problems that has plagued conventional approaches to lithium air cells. Selected inorganic molten salts have good solubility of lithium/oxygen reaction products, thus allowing better control of cell kinetics.
The rechargeable air battery according to the invention contains a ceramic separator which forms an anode chamber, a molten lithium anode contained in the anode chamber, an air cathode, and a non-aqueous electrolyte. Each of these components will be described in more detail below.
The cell further comprises a flow system which is provided by a temperature gradient across the cathode. More specifically, the cathode has two temperature regions: a high temperature region (preferably located near the anode, where the reaction takes place) and a low temperature region which is located further away from the anode. As the electrolyte circulates through the cell during discharge, the reaction product produced by the battery migrates from the high temperature region to the low temperature region.
The anode chamber is preferably formed by a sealed ceramic enclosure that is lithium ion conductive and which functions as the separator for the battery. Preferably, the ceramic material is stable in contact with lithium metal and protects the anode from ambient oxygen and moisture. Preferred materials include lithium ion conducting glasses such as lithium beta alumina, lithium phosphate glass, lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO), Al2O3:Li7La3Zr2O12, lithium aluminum germanium phosphate (LAGP), and lithium aluminum titanium phosphate (LATP). In a preferred embodiment, the anode chamber is maintained at about 20° C. to about 200° C., more preferably at about 175° C. to about 200° C., most preferably about 175° C. to about 195° C.
The anode comprises metallic lithium in a molten state; lithium has a melting point of about 180° C. The benefit of the molten lithium anode is that it limits undesirable dendrite growth in the cell.
The non-aqueous electrolyte is chosen for stability in contact with lithium. Thus, a breach in the ceramic enclosure will not result in rapid reactions, particularly because air ingress into the cell will be controlled. Preferred electrolytes include molten inorganic salts, for example, alkali nitrates such as lithium and sodium nitrate, alkali chlorides and bromides such as lithium, potassium and sodium chlorides and bromides, alkali carbonates such as sodium and lithium carbonates, as well as sodium nitrate-potassium nitrate (NaNO3—KNO3) eutectic mixtures and silane and siloxane-based compounds including, for example, hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane, octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, decamethylcyclopentasiloxane, and dodecamethylhexatetrasiloxane with or without polyethylene oxide groups.
The inorganic salt, silane, or siloxane in the electrolyte is present in a solvent. The solvent is not limited, and may be selected based on the preferred operating temperature of the battery. A preferred solvent is LiCl—KCl eutectic, which works at a temperature of 350° C. to 450° C. The temperature of the electrolyte may be controlled with a heater and is preferably about 200° C. to 450° C.
The air cathode or positive electrode is porous so that oxygen can penetrate through the pores and form lithium peroxide as the reaction product; electrolyte also flows through the porous cathode. The cathode is preferably formed from a porous ceramic material which is lithium conductive and which is infiltrated or impregnated with a metal nitrate such as silver nitrate or a carbon material such as carbon fibers, carbon black, or carbon foam. Preferred porous ceramic materials include LLZO, LAGP, LATP, and lithium oxyanions such as lithium carbonate; most preferred is LLZO. In another preferred embodiment, the cathode contains a carbon material, a heat resistance polymer binder such as polyimide, and a metal oxide catalyst. An exemplary cathode material of this type contains about 60% by weight vapor grown carbon fibers, about 30% polyimide binder, and about 10% manganese dioxide. The cathode may also be constructed of electrically conductive sintered metal oxide powder, sintered metal nitride, carbon, or sintered silicon carbide.
As a preferred example, porous lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO) ceramic substrates are prepared by pressing 10-15 grams of LLZO powder into a disc at 1000 psi. The disc is densified by placing in a furnace at 1000° C. for a period of 1 hour. The disc is then impregnated with a metal nitrate such as silver nitrate to form the cathode.
A thermodynamic process is employed to remove and supply electrolyte to cathode reaction sites. In its basic configuration, a temperature gradient is maintained across the structure of the cathode wetted by the electrolyte. The active charge/discharge reaction region of the cell forms the higher temperature region of the gradient. As a result of the temperature gradient, during discharge, reaction product accumulated within the electrolyte at the higher temperature region migrates to the lower temperature region where it precipitates/solidifies. The configuration of the cell is such that reaction product can accumulate within the lower temperature region physically away from the higher temperature reaction region of the cell. Accumulation of reaction product in the lower temperature region prevents it from significantly affecting the charge/discharge cell kinetics occurring in the higher temperature cathode reaction region. Ultimately, the cooled and settled reaction product will become re-dissolved in the electrolyte. This flow system is a key attribute of the inventive batteries.
In an alternative embodiment, the cell contains a pump to circulate the electrolyte across the temperature gradient. Such a cell contains a molten or another appropriate electrolyte reservoir and a temperature control system for controlling the relative temperatures of the cathode and the reservoir. Further, a heating element is employed for electrolyte temperature control. The pump system cycles electrolyte between the cathode and the electrolyte reservoir, which are adjacent to and in fluid communication with each other. Operation is such that during discharge, the cathode is maintained at a temperature that is elevated above that of the electrolyte reservoir. Reaction product dissolved in the electrolyte at high temperature in the cathode is carried to the electrolyte reservoir where it precipitates due to the lower temperature therein. In contrast, during charge, heat is supplied to the reservoir to maintain solubility of reaction product into the electrolyte. During charge, the electrolyte carries dissolved reaction product from the reservoir to the cathode, where it is electrolyzed. Oxygen is released and lithium ions are conducted through the ceramic separator such that lithium metal is plated at the anode. Electrolyte depleted of reaction product circulates back to the reservoir where it dissolves and carries more reaction product to the cathode as the charge process continues. The configuration is such that the reaction product is temporarily stored as a solid in the electrolyte reservoir as opposed to the cathode. Operation in this manner enables the cathode to be maintained in an optimum configuration for maximum charge and discharge performance.
Dissolved reaction product 11 generated during discharge will preferentially precipitate in the lower temperature regions of the fins as opposed to the warmer core region. Molten electrolyte reservoir 1 contains excess electrolyte 3 and electrolyte that has been displaced by reaction product as it is produced and deposited within fins 10. Reservoir 1 may be maintained at a temperature that is lower than the core of the cell such that the reaction product preferentially precipitates therein as well. The temperature of the reservoir is controlled by heater element 5. During recharge, reaction product re-dissolves into the molten salt electrolyte to maintain concentration equilibrium as product is electrolyzed and lithium is re-plated at the anode. Heater 5 is used during recharge to heat the electrolyte to redissolve reaction product. The heat source for core 6 of the cell is not shown but would maintain temperature for operation during both charge and discharge.
Reservoir 18 supplies lithium 14 to annular cavity 4 so that the cavity does not become depleted as the lithium is consumed during discharge. Similarly, as lithium is reduced into the annular section during recharge, lithium is resupplied and accumulated in the reservoir.
Heater element 7 located in the center region of the cell maintains the lithium anode and the electrolyte salt contained in the cathode in a molten state. Because of its location and because of the loss of heat from the cathode fins to the air surrounding the cell, a decreasing temperature exists between the core of the cell 6 and fin tips 12. The molar equilibrium of dissolved lithium/oxygen reaction product in the molten salt will be lower at the lower temperature fin tips 12 than at the high temperature cathode material 45 that is closest to the core of the cell. As such, reaction product 48 will tend to precipitate out of solution in the region of fin tips 12, resulting in a buildup of reaction product 41 in that location. Although reaction kinetics will favor the high temperature region, creation of reaction product in high temperature region 14 will cause over saturation and precipitation of reaction product in lower temperature fin tip region 12. Migration to fin tips 12 will occur because the molar concentration of reaction product in the salt is continuous between the two regions. The salt level will naturally be uniformly distributed, limited only by mass transport rate across the concentration gradients of the dissolved product within the molten salt. Further production of reaction products in the solution in the higher temperature regions will cause precipitation of reaction product in the lower temperature region since the increase would cause over saturation in the low temperature region.
Having the reaction product accumulate in the fin tip regions of the cell is important because precipitation in this region has only very limited adverse impacts on operation of the cell. The invention thus avoids over accumulation of reaction product in the active region of the cell which could cause a reduction of ionic conductivity and could block access and diffusion of oxygen to reaction sites.
As reaction product 58 is consumed from the molten salt electrolyte solution, its molar concentration level in the electrolyte eutectic tends lower, thus allowing additional reaction product precipitant 41 to dissolve into the electrolyte. The re-dissolved reaction product naturally migrates toward the core region of the cell due to the concentration gradient created as reaction product in the core region is removed by the recharge process. Continuous dissolving of reaction product 41 maintains a molar equilibrium concentration level of the reaction product in the electrolyte in fin tip region 12 until all of discharge reaction product 41 is re-dissolved and electrolyzed, whereby the cell will be fully charged.
Operation of the cell is such that molten salt electrolyte 102 washing through cathode 98 dissolves lithium-air reaction products produced therein as the cell is discharged. Oxygen depleted air 99 exits the reactor chamber through port 100. Air 84 enters the cell at port 91 and passes through heat exchanger 90, heat exchanger 105 and heat exchanger 92 prior to entering reaction chamber and molten salt electrolyte reservoir 68. The flow rate can be controlled by valve 108. The heat exchangers preheat air 84 to a level such that it enters nozzle 87 near the temperature of molten salt electrolyte 78 exiting nozzle 80. Air entering the reaction chamber and molten salt electrolyte reservoir 68 is heated within heat exchangers 90 and 92 by oxygen depleted air 99 exiting the reaction chamber through conduit 88. Air passing through heat exchanger 105 inside reactorreaction chamber and molten salt electrolyte reservoir 68 is heated by molten electrolyte salt 78. Extraction of heat from electrolyte 78 in the electrolyte reservoir maintains its temperature below the temperature of the electrolyte 102 that is washing through cathode 98. Electric heater 96 is thermally coupled to separator 71 and supplies energy as needed to maintain the temperature of cathode 98 above the temperature the reservoir electrolyte 78 that is thermally coupled to heat exchanger 105. The effect of the thus maintained temperature difference is that electrolyte 102 washing through cathode 98 is raised to a higher temperature than electrolyte 78 that is in the reservoir. Continuous flow of electrolyte continuously dissolves and washes away reaction product being produced in cathode 98. On the other hand, when the electrolyte leaves cathode 98 and is cooled by heat exchanger 105 in the reservoir, its saturation limit for dissolved reaction product decreases, which causes a portion of the reaction product to precipitate, 97. The electric heater 94 is used to control the temperature of the electrolyte. The discharge process continues as pump 75 resupplies electrolyte 78, now depleted of reaction product, to nozzle 80 where it entrains more air and carries it to cathode 98, is reheated, and dissolves more reaction product as it occurs from lithium air reactions ongoing therein.
In an exemplary cell shown in
In a cell operating at 300° C. with NaNO3—KNO3 molten salt eutectic electrolyte, the conductivity of the electrolyte is 0.66 S/cm. Similarly, the conductivity of the solid electrolyte containment cylinder 2 at 300° C. is 0.1 S/cm as shown in
Sintered LLZO electrolyte had been demonstrated to be stable with lithium in all solid state batteries. (See T. Yoshida, et. al.; Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 157-10, A1076-A1079 (2010)). The cyclic voltammogram of the Li/LLZO/Li cell showed that the dissolution and deposition reactions of lithium occurred reversibly without any reaction with LLZO. This indicates that a Li metal anode can be employed in contact with LLZO electrolyte.
In an exemplary embodiment, a 1 kWh battery is designed to operate at a discharge rate of 1 C, i.e. battery totally discharged in 1 hour. Lithium has a specific energy of 11,580 Wh/kg. If the mass of the oxygen is included, the net energy density is 5,200 Wh/kg. For a 1 kWh battery, 86 g of lithium would be needed. Lithium has a discharge current capacity of 3.86 Ah/g. At a discharge rate of 1 C, the required discharge current would be 332 A (86 g*3.86 Ah/g/1 hr). In this example, the area of the separator may be defined as 100 cm2 and the solid separator as LLZO or other suitable substitute thereof. In this example the use of a 100 cm2 separator results in a net current density of 3.32 A/cm2. As indicated in
The atomic mass of lithium is 6.9 g/mole. The primary discharge reaction for the cell is 2Li+O2>Li2O2, 1 mole of oxygen is required for per mole of lithium. The number of moles of lithium in the reaction is 12.46, (86 g/6.9 g/mole). Therefore, 6.23 moles or 199.4 grams (6.23 moles *32 grams/mole) of oxygen are required to balance the reaction. Air is 23% oxygen by mass so that the total amount of air needed for the reaction is 866 g, (199.4 g O2/(0.23 g O2/gAir). For the 1 C discharge, the air mass flow rate is 866 g/hr or 0.24 g/sec. The density of air is 0.00123 g/cm3. This gives a volumetric flow rate of 195 cm3/sec.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the broad inventive concept thereof. It is understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but it is intended to cover modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 10,218,044, issued on Feb. 26, 2019 from U.S. application Ser. No. 15/408,991, filed Jan. 18, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/281,875, filed Jan. 22, 2016, the disclosuredisclosures of which isare herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3237078 | Mallory | Feb 1966 | A |
3393355 | Whoriskey et al. | Jul 1968 | A |
4299682 | Oda et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4303877 | Meinhold | Dec 1981 | A |
4352068 | Weppner | Sep 1982 | A |
4386020 | Hartwig et al. | May 1983 | A |
4419421 | Wichelhaus et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4495078 | Bell et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4513069 | Kreuer et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4526855 | Hartwig et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4614905 | Petersson et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4654281 | Anderman et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4704341 | Weppner et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4710848 | Schlechtriemen et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4719401 | Altmejd | Jan 1988 | A |
4728590 | Redey | Mar 1988 | A |
4777119 | Brault et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4792752 | Schlechtriemen et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4803134 | Sammells | Feb 1989 | A |
4885267 | Takahara et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4931214 | Worrell et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5023153 | Weppner | Jun 1991 | A |
5202788 | Weppner | Apr 1993 | A |
5238761 | Ryan | Aug 1993 | A |
5260821 | Chu et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270635 | Hoffman et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5291116 | Feldstein | Mar 1994 | A |
5314765 | Bates | May 1994 | A |
5322601 | Liu et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5336573 | Zuckerbrod et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5338625 | Bates et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5362581 | Chang et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5387857 | Honda et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5411592 | Ovshinsky et al. | May 1995 | A |
5432026 | Sahm et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5445906 | Hobson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455126 | Bates et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5474959 | Schafer et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5512147 | Bates et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5522955 | Brodd | Jun 1996 | A |
5561004 | Bates et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5567210 | Bates et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569520 | Bates | Oct 1996 | A |
5597660 | Bates et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5612152 | Bates | Mar 1997 | A |
5654084 | Egert | Aug 1997 | A |
5677081 | Iwamoto et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5705293 | Hobson | Jan 1998 | A |
5778515 | Menon | Jul 1998 | A |
5783333 | Mayer | Jul 1998 | A |
5783928 | Okamura | Jul 1998 | A |
5811205 | Andrieu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821733 | Turnbull | Oct 1998 | A |
6022642 | Tsukamoto et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6136472 | Barker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139986 | Kurokawa et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168884 | Neudecker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182340 | Bishop | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201123 | Daikai et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6242129 | Johnson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255122 | Duncombe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6387563 | Bates | May 2002 | B1 |
6413285 | Chu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6413672 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6541161 | Scanlon, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6679926 | Kajiura et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6827921 | Singhal et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6852139 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6886240 | Zhang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6887612 | Bitterlich et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7230404 | Kimoto et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7276308 | Formanski et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7510800 | Yoshida et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7524580 | Birke et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7540886 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7557055 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7674559 | Min et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691536 | Johnson | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7732096 | Thackeray et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7776478 | Klaassen | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7824795 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7901658 | Weppner et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914932 | Yoshida et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7998622 | Inda | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8092941 | Weppner et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8173292 | Kato | May 2012 | B2 |
8192869 | Teramoto | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8211496 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8221916 | Inda | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8313721 | Thackeray et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8383268 | Inda | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8431287 | Teramoto | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8476174 | Inda | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8568921 | Johnson | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8778546 | Farmer | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8795868 | Miles | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8808407 | Inda | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8822077 | Katoh | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852816 | Ogasa | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8883355 | Inda | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8951681 | Katoh | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9034525 | Babic et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9153838 | Ogasa | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9159989 | Ogasa | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9178255 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9203123 | Prochazka, Jr. et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9263770 | Boxley et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9266780 | Ogasa | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9379375 | Sugiura et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9385405 | Murata et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9413033 | Ogasa | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9413036 | Bhavaraju et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9425454 | Sugiura et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9450278 | Kim et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9680191 | Lee et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9711822 | Nakashima et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9917304 | Lee et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9954260 | Ho | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9997813 | Park et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10566611 | Allie et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10686224 | Angell et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10693170 | Jin et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10734686 | Robins et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10797340 | Lee et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
20010014505 | Duncombe et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010036578 | Nishida et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020000541 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020008706 | Mayes et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020119375 | Zhang | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030012996 | Bitterlich et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030039 | Sasaki et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030118897 | Mino et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030157407 | Kosuzu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040081888 | Thackeray et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040101761 | Park et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111874 | Schierle-Arndt et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118700 | Schierle-Arndt et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040151986 | Park et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040191617 | Visco et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050084758 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095506 | Klaassen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100793 | Jonghe et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050147890 | Shembel et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050266150 | Yong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060046149 | Yong et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068282 | Kishi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060093916 | Howard et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060165578 | Sasaki et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060246355 | Min et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287188 | Borland et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070031323 | Baik et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048617 | Inda | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087269 | Inda | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070148545 | Amine et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148553 | Weppner | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070231704 | Inda | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070264579 | Ota | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080131781 | Yong et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080220334 | Inda | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080241698 | Katoh | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268346 | Inda | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090004371 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090068563 | Kanda et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081554 | Takada et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081555 | Teramoto | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092903 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090098281 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090142669 | Shinohara et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162755 | Neudecker | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090194222 | Teramoto | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090197178 | Inda | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090197182 | Katoh | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090214957 | Okada et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090274832 | Inda | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100028782 | Inda | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100047696 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100104948 | Skotheim et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100203383 | Weppner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100291443 | Farmer | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100308278 | Kepler et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110053001 | Babic et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110059369 | Nan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110076542 | Farmer | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110086274 | Chang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110133136 | Weppner et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110177397 | Ogasa | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110209859 | Reinke et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223460 | Farmer | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223467 | Shacklette et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223487 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110300451 | Inda | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110318650 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120100433 | Suyama et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120141881 | Geier et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120196189 | Babic et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237834 | Ogasa | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120251882 | Moon et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120264021 | Sugiura et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120270115 | Johnson | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130011751 | Nakada et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130011752 | Tanaami et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130017454 | Sato et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130095394 | Tanaami et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130157149 | Peled | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130164616 | Nakada et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130230777 | Babic et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130273437 | Yoshioka et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130309551 | Ogasa | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130344416 | Sakamoto et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140008006 | Lee et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140011080 | Lee et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140011095 | Lee et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140023933 | Chiga et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140038058 | Holzapfel et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140065456 | Bhavaraju | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140099538 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140099556 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140287305 | Wachsman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150037688 | Otsuka et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150056518 | Babic et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150056520 | Thokchom et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150099187 | Cui et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150099197 | Nakashima et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150333307 | Thokchom et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160028133 | Miles | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036109 | Kim et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160149261 | Zaghib et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160164153 | Kim et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160181657 | Kawaji et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160329539 | Kawaji et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160336583 | Smith et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170179521 | Sakamoto | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170214106 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170222287 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20190296276 | Bradwell et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190372148 | He et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20210218091 | Uddin et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210265616 | Kim et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1866583 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101434417 | May 2009 | CN |
101494299 | Jul 2009 | CN |
102214827 | Oct 2011 | CN |
102013536 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102934279 | Feb 2013 | CN |
104245624 | Dec 2014 | CN |
206048735 | Mar 2017 | CN |
107437636 | Dec 2017 | CN |
206921981 | Jan 2018 | CN |
207413450 | May 2018 | CN |
4309070 | Sep 1994 | DE |
102004010892 | Nov 2005 | DE |
102007030604 | Jan 2009 | DE |
102010019187 | Nov 2011 | DE |
102015220354 | Apr 2017 | DE |
0070020 | Jan 1983 | EP |
0033935 | Aug 1985 | EP |
0177062 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0190605 | Aug 1986 | EP |
0206339 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0226955 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0232513 | Aug 1987 | EP |
0243975 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0249802 | Dec 1987 | EP |
238383 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0408039 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0227996 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0470597 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0693581 | May 1998 | EP |
1271683 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1431422 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1431423 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1237212 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2037527 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2086040 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2181971 | May 2010 | EP |
2685551 | Jan 2014 | EP |
2706598 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2903060 | Aug 2015 | EP |
2466107 | Mar 1981 | FR |
1329688 | Sep 1973 | GB |
1599792 | Oct 1981 | GB |
2226441 | Dec 1992 | GB |
S628452 | Jan 1987 | JP |
H05-310417 | Nov 1993 | JP |
H07235291 | Sep 1995 | JP |
2000311710 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000331680 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000331684 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001126757 | May 2001 | JP |
2001126758 | May 2001 | JP |
2001243954 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2003132921 | May 2003 | JP |
2004127613 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2006260887 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006261008 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006310295 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2008505458 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2009176741 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2010067499 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010080426 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010129190 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010132533 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010244729 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2011134675 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2011150817 | Aug 2011 | JP |
2011249254 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012003940 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012099315 | May 2012 | JP |
2012146479 | Aug 2012 | JP |
2013037992 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2013157084 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2013532359 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2015013775 | Jan 2015 | JP |
2015138741 | Jul 2015 | JP |
2015144061 | Aug 2015 | JP |
2015204215 | Nov 2015 | JP |
2015230801 | Dec 2015 | JP |
20140006046 | Jan 2014 | KR |
2126192 | Feb 1999 | RU |
2005085138 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006005066 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006019245 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007004590 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007075867 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2009003695 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009029746 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2011007445 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011125481 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011150528 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011154869 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2011156392 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012008422 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012016606 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012018831 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012128374 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2012144553 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2013049460 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013085557 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013130983 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013131005 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2014058683 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014058684 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2015007680 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015104538 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015128982 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2015151144 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2016102373 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016116400 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2016141765 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2020225313 | Nov 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2020 in CN Application No. 201780007783.8. |
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 12, 2020 in EP Application No. 19192837.3. |
Kim et al., “A review of lithium and non-lithium based solid state batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 282, pp. 299-322 (2015). |
Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,991, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2019 in JP Application No. 2018538203 (Partial English Translation). |
“All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Battery Using Li2.2C0.8B0 203 Electrolyte” External Program 20th Century International Conferencer, Presented on Poster Board, 2 pgs (Jun. 15, 2015). |
Aaltonen et al., “Lithium Lanthanum Titanate Thin Films Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition for All-Solid-State Lithium Ion Battery Applications,” Abstract #688, The 15th International Meeting on Lithium Batteries (2010). |
Adachi et al., “Ionic Conducting Lanthanide Oxides,” Chem. Rev., vol. 102, pp. 2405-2429 (2002). |
Ahn et al., “Characteristics of Amorphous Lithium Lanthanum Titanate Electrolyte Thin Films Grown by PLD for Use in Rechargeable Lithium Microbatteries,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. A75-A78 (2005). |
Ahn et al., “Characteristics of Perovskite (Li0.5La0.5)TiO3 Solid Electrolyte Thin Films Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition for Rechargeable Lithium Microbattery,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 50, pp. 371-374 (2004). |
Ahn et al., “Effect of Li0.5La0.5TiO3 Solid Electrolyte Films on Electrochemical Properties of LiCoO2 Thin Film Cathodes with Different Rapid-Thermal Annealing Conditions,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 2089-2094 (2005). |
Allen et al., “Effect of substitution (Ta, Al, Ga) on the conductivity of Li7La3Zr2012,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 206, pp. 315-319(2012). |
Allnatt et al., “Atomic Transport in Solids,” Cambridge University Press, pp. ix-xiii (2003). |
Annamareddy et al., “Ion Hopping and Constrained Li Diffusion Pathways in the Superionic State of Antifluorite Li2O,” Entropy, vol. 19, No. 227, pp. 1-11 (2017). |
Aruna et al., “Combustion Synthesis and Nanomaterials,” Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, vol. 12, pp. 44-50 (2008). |
Awaka et al., “Synthesis and Structure Analysis of Tetragonal Li7La3Zr2012 with the Garnet-Related Type Structure,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 182, No. 8, pp. 2046-2052 (2009). |
Balkanski et al., “Integrable lithium solid-state microbatteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 26, pp. 615-622 (1989). |
Bates et al., “Rechargeable Thin-Film Lithium Batteries,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory Publication, 9 pgs (1993). |
Billinge, “The Nanostructure Problem,” Physics, vol. 3, No. 25, pp. 1-3 (2010). |
Birke et al., “A first approach to a monolithic all solid state inorganic lithium battery,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 118, pp. 149-157 (1999). |
Birke et al., “Electrolytic Stability Limit and Rapid Lithium Insertion in the Fast-Ion-Conducting Li0.29La0.57TiO3 Perovskite-Type Compound,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 144, No. 6, pp. L167-L169 (1997). |
Bohnke et al., “Mechanism of Ionic Conduction and Electrochemical Intercalation of Lithium into the Perovskite Lanthanum Lithium Titanate,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 91, pp. 21-31 (1996). |
Boyd, “Thin Film Growth by Pulsed Laser Deposition,” Ceramics International, vol. 22, pp. 429-434 (1996). |
Boyle et al., “All-Ceramic Thin Film Battery,” Sandia Report 2002-3615 Unlimited Release, 53 pages (Nov. 2002). |
Brenier, “Stress and Moisture-Sorption in Ozone-Annealed Films of Zirconium Oxide Obtained from Sol-Gel,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 25, pp. 57-63 (2002). |
Brinker et al., “Sol-Gel Science: The Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing,” Academic Press, pp. 21, 95, 153, 513, 675, 742, 787, and 837 (1990). |
Buschmann et al., “Structure and dynamics of the fast lithium ion conductor 'Li7La3Zr2012,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 13, p. 19378-19392 (2011) (Abstract Only). |
Cao et al., “Microstructure and Ionic Conductivity of Sb-doped Li7La3Zr2012,” Journal of Inorganic Materials,vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 220-224 (2014). |
Chabal et al., “Safer High-performance Electrodes, Solid Electrolytes, and Interface Reactions for Lithium-Ion Batteries,” Material Matters, vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 104-110 (2013). |
Chen et al., “High Capacity and Cyclic Performance in a Three-Dimensional Composite Electrode Filled with Inorganic Solid Electrolyte,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 249, pp. 306-310 (2014). |
Chen et al., “Improving ionic conductivity of Li0.35La0.55Ti03 ceramics by introducing Li7La3Zr2012 sol into the precursor powder,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 235, pp. 8-13 (2013). |
Cussen, “Structure and Ionic Conductivity in Lithium Garnets,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 20, pp. 5167-5173 (2010). |
Davison et al., “Low Cost, Novel Methods for Fabricating All-Solid-State Lithium Ion Batteries,” downloaded from web page: <http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-042312-141301/unrestricted/SS_Lithium_Ion_Battery_MQP_Final_Report.pdf>, Download date: Apr. 23, 2012, original posting date unknown, 126 pages. |
Decision to Grant dated Nov. 24, 2020 in KR Application No. 1020187020835. |
Drabold, “Topics in the Theory of Amorphous Materials,” The European Physical Journal B, vol. 68, pp. 1-21 (2009). |
Elliott, “Physics of Amorphous Materials,” Longman Scientific & Technical, Ed. 2, pp. v-vi (1990). |
Examination Report dated Jun. 22, 2016 in EP Application No. 13776685.3. |
Examination Report dated Nov. 30, 2016 in EP Application No. 13776685.3. |
Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 8, 2017 in EP Application 16202541. |
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 16, 2017 in EP Application No. 17150717. |
Furusawa et al., “Ionic Conductivity of Amorphous Lithium Lanthanum Titanate Thin Film,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 176, pp. 553-558 (2005). |
Gao et al., “Sol-gel Synthesis and Electrical Properties of Li5La3Ta2O12 Lithium Ionic Conductors,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 181, Nos. 1-2, pp. 33-36 (2009). |
Geiger et al., “Crystal Chemistry and Stability of‘Li7La3Zr2O12’ Garnet: A Fast Lithium-Ion Conductor,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 50, pp. 1089-1097 (2011). |
Giordani et al., “A Molten Salt Lithium-Oxygen Battery,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, 26 pages (2016). |
Glass et al., “Ionic Conductivity of Quenched Alkali Niobate and Tantalate Glasses,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 4808-4811 (1978). |
Goodenough et al., “Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 587-603 (2010). |
Hámáláinen et al., “Lithium Phosphate Thin Films Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 15 9, No. 3, pp. A259-A263 (2012). |
Huggins, “Advanced Batteries: Materials Science Aspects,” Springer, Ed. 1, p. xvii-xxx and pp. 368-371 (2008). |
Inaguma et al., “High Ionic Conductivity in Lithium Lanthanum Titanate,” Solid State Communications, vol. 86, No. 10, pp. 689-693 (1993). |
Int'l Preliminary Examination Report on Patentability dated Jul. 5, 2018 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2016/068105. |
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 14, 2013 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2011/046289. |
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 23, 2015 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/063160. |
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 2, 2014 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/028672. |
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 12, 2014 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/028633. |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 16, 2021 in EP Application No. 21186896.3. |
Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2022 in EP Application No. 16823507.5. |
Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2016 in EP Application No. 13776685.3. |
Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,421 by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2018 in CN Application No. 201380052598.2. |
Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/387,143, by Allie. |
Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/382,194, by Thokchom. |
Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,525 by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2017 in CN Application No. 201380052598.2. |
Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2017 in JP Application No. 2014-560097. |
Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2020 in KR Application No. 1020187020835. |
Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2016 in CN Application No. 201380023413.5. |
Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,525, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/109,295, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2021 in CN Application No. 201680075318.3. |
Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2018 in CN Application No. 201380023413.5. |
Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,525 by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2018 in EP Application No. 16202541.5. |
Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/848,991 by Babic. |
Office Action dated May 1, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/410,895, by Babic. |
Office Action dated May 4, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,951 by Johnson. |
Office Action dated May 4, 2016 in KR Application No. 10-2014-7027734. |
Office Action dated May 19, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,421, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated May 30, 2017 in JP Application No. 2015-535772. |
Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2016 in CN Application No. 201380052598.2. |
Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2019 in CN Application No. 201380052598.2. |
Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/382,194, by Thokchom. |
Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2017 in JP Application No. 2015-535773. |
Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/382,191, by Thokchom. |
Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/387,143, by Allie. |
Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,951, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2019 in JP Application No. 2018551909. |
Office Action datedJun. 26, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/530,171 by Babic. |
Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/382,194, by Thokchom. |
Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,525 by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2016 in CN Application No. 201380052635.X. |
Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,044, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2016 in KR Application No. 10-2014-7027734. |
Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2017 in CN Application No. 201380052635.X. |
Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,951, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,525, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2020 in CN Application No. 201680075318.3. |
Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,525, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,421, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2021 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,421, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2017 in CN Application No. 2013800234135. |
Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,421, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2016 in JP Application No. 2014-560097. |
Office Action dated Aug. 30, 2021 in JP Application No. 2020114023. |
Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2015 in KR Application No. 10-2014-7027734. |
Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2018 in CN Application No. 201380052598.2. |
Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2015 in EP Application No. 13776685.3. |
Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2015 in JP Application No. 2014-560097, translation only. |
Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,421 by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2021 in CN Application No. 201910697285.1 (with English Translation of Search Report). |
Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,421, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2020 in JP Application No. 2019173287. |
Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,421, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2021 in CN Application No. 201680075318.3. |
Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2016 in CN Application No. 201380023413.5. |
Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,951, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/848,991 by Babic. |
Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2018 in CN Application No. 2013800234135. |
Oh et al., “Ionomer Binders Can Improve Discharge Rate Capability in Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 158, No. 2, pp A207-A213 (2011). |
Ohta et al., “All-solid-state lithium ion battery using garnet-type oxide and Li3BO3 solid electrolytes fabricated by screen-printing,” Journal of Power Sources (2013). |
Okumura et al., “All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Battery Using Li2.2C0.8B0.8B0.2O3 Electrolyte”, Solid State Ionic, vol. 288, pp. 248-252 (2016). |
Owen, “Rechargeable Lithium Batteries,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 26, pp. 259-267 (1997). |
Peters et al., “Ionic Conductivity and Activation Energy for Oxygen Ion Transport in Superlattices - The Multilayer System CSZ (ZrO2 + CaO) / AI203,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 178, Nos. 1-2, pp. 67-76 (2007). |
Pham et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Nanostructured Fast Ionic Conductor Li0.30La0.56TiO3,” Chemistry ol Materials, vol. 18, No. 18, pp. 4385-4392 (2006). |
Popovici et al., “Sol-gel Preparation and Characterization of Perovskite Lanthanum Lithium Titanate,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 42, pp. 3373-3377 (2007). |
Ramzy et al., “Tailor-Made Development of Fast Li Ion Conducting Garnet-Like Solid Electrolytes,” Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 385-390 (2010). |
Raskovalov et al., “Structure and transport properties of Li7La3Zr2-0.75xAlxO2 superionic solid electrolytes,” Journal of Power Sources (2013). |
Rowsell et al., “A new class of materials for lithium-ion batteries: iron(III) borates,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 98-98, pp. 254-257 (2001). |
Sakamoto, “Lithium Batteries,” Michigan State University (2011). |
Sanchez et al., “Chemical Modification of Alkoxide Precursors,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 100, pp. 65-76 (1988). |
Scanlon, “Lithium Polymer Battery, Final Report for Dec. 8, 1994-Dec. 30, 2002,” Energy Storage and Thermal Sciences Branch, Air Force Research Laboratory (2003). |
Shannon et al., “New Li Solid Electrolytes”, Electro, vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 783-796 (Jul. 1977). |
Singhal et al., “High Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Design and Applications,” Elsevier Advanced Technology, 430 pages (2003). |
Song et al., “Review of Gel-Type Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium-ion Batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 77, pp. 183-197 (1999). |
Stramare et al., “Lithium Lanthanum Titanates: A Review,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 15, pp. 3974-3990 (2003). |
Sulaiman, “Fabrication and Characterization of LiN03-AI203 Composite Solid Electrolytes,” 2013 3rd International Conference on Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, vol. 38, pp. 1-5 (2012). |
Sun et al., “High-Strength All-Solid Lithium Ion Electrodes Based on Li4Ti5012,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 196, pp. 6507-11 (2011). |
Tadnaga et al., “Low temperature synthesis of highly ion conductive Li7La3Zr2O12-Li3B03 composites,” Electrochemistry Communications (Apr. 3, 2013). |
Tan et al., “Fabrication and Characterization of Li7La3Zr2012 Thin Films for Lithium Ion Battery,” ECS Solid State Letters, vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 057-060 (2012). |
Tan et al., “Garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12 Electrolyte Prepared by a Solution-Based Technique for Lithium ion battery,” Water. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, vol. 1440, 6 pages (2012). |
Fan et al., “Synthesis of Cubic Phase Li7La3Zr2O12 Electrolyte for Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. A37-A39 (2012). |
Tan, “Materials for energy storage in Lithium-Ion batteries,” Dissertation submitted to the University of Utah (Dec. 2012). |
Thangadurai et al., “Investigations on Electrical Conductivity and Chemical Compatibility Between Fast Llithium Ion Conducting Garnet-Life Li6BaLa2Ta2O12 and Lithium Battery Cathodes,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 142, pp. 339-344 (2005). |
Vijayakumar et al., “Synthesis of Fine Powders of Li3xLa2/3-xTiO3 Perovskite by a Polymerizable Precursor Method,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 16, No. 14, pp. 2719-2724 (2004). |
Wang et al., “lonic/Electronic Conducting Characteristics of LiFePO4 Cathode Materials,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. A65-A69 (2007). |
West, “Basic Solid State Chemistry,” John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Ed. 2, pp. vii-xv, 346-351 (1999). |
Wohrle et al., “Sol-Gel Synthesis of the Lithium-Ion Conducting Perovskite La0.57Li0.3TiO3 Effect of Synthesis and Thermal Treatments on the Structure and Conducting Properties,” Ionics, vol. 2, pp. 442-445 (1996). |
Wolfenstine, “Grain Boundary Conductivity in Crystalline LiTi2(PO4)3,” Army Research Laboratory (Apr. 2008). |
Written Opinion dated Sep. 22, 2014 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/063161. |
Wu et al., “Sol-gel preparation and characterization of Li1.3AI0.3Ti1 7(PO4)3 sintered with flux of LiBO2,” Rare Metals, vol. 29, No. 5, p. 515(2010). |
Xiong et al., “Effects of Annealing Temperature on Structure and Opt-Electric Properties of Ion-Conducting LLTO Thin Films Prepared by RF Magnetron Sputtering,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 509, pp. 1910-1914 (2011). |
Xu et al., “Structures of Orthoborate Anions and Physical Properties of Their Lithium Salt Nonaqueous Solutions,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 150, No. 1, pp. E74-E80 (2003). |
Xu, “Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 104, pp. 1303-4417 (2004). |
Yang et al., “Ionic to Mixed lonic/Electronic Conduction Transition of Chemically Lithiated Li0.33La0.56TiO3 at Room Temperature: Lithium-ion-Motion Dependent Electron Hopping,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, pp. 1-3 (2006). |
Yu et al., “A Stable Thin-Film Lithium Electrolyte: Lithium Phosphorus Oxynitride,” J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 144, No. 2, pp. 524-532 (1997). |
Zallen, “The Physics of Amorphous Solids,” Wiley-VCH, Ed. 1, pp. ix-xi (1983). |
Zhang et al., “Effect of lithium borate addition on the physical and electrochemical properties of the lithium ion conductor Li3.4Si0.4P0.6O4,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 231, pp. 109-115 (2013). |
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 22, 2014 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/063161. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 6, 2012 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2011/046289. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 25, 2014 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/063160. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 23, 2014 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/063161. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 15, 2013 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/028672. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 22, 2013 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/028633. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2020 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2020/026334. |
Int'l Search Report dated Feb. 17, 2017 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2016/068105 (Partial). |
Int'l Search Report dated Apr. 12, 2017 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2016/068105 (Complete). |
Jena et al., “Studies on the Ionic Transport and Structural Investigations of La0.5Li0.5TiO3 Perovskite Synthesized by Wet Chemical Methods and the Effect of Ce, Zr Substitution at Ti site,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 40, pp. 4737-4748 (2005). |
Jin et al., “Al-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 synthesized by a polymerized complex method,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 196, pp. 8683-8687 (2011). |
Jin et al., “All-Solid-State Rechargeable Lithium Ion Battery Fabrication with Al-Doped Li7La3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolyte,” Retrieved from <http://intemational.dep.anl.gov/Postdocs/Symposium/Program/Presentations/32.pdf>, Download date: Oct. 8, 2012, original posting date: unknown, 1 page. |
Jin et al., “Bulk solid state rechargeable lithium ion battery fabrication with Al-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 electrolyte and Cu0.1V2O5 cathode,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 89, pp. 407-412 (2013). |
Jin, “Processing and characterization of secondary solid-state Li-Ion batteries,” Dissertation submitted to the University of Notre Dame, 128 pages (Apr. 2013). |
Jinlian et al., “Enhanced high temperature performance of LiMn2O4 coated with Li3BO3 solid electrolyte,” Bull. Mater. Sci., vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 687-691 (2013). |
Kanamura et al., “Three Dimensionally ordered composite solid materials for all solid-state rechargeable lithium batteries” Journal of Power Sources, 146, pp. 86-89, 2005. |
Khatun et al., Impact of Lithium Composition on Structural, Electronic and Optical Properties of Lithium Cobaltite Prepared by Solid-state Reaction Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 217-231 (2014). |
Kim et al., “Characterization of the Interface Between LiCoO2 and Li7La3Zr2O12 in an All-Solid-State Rechargeable Lithium Battery,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 196, pp. 764-767 (2011). |
Kishida et al., “Microstructure of the LiCoO2 (cathode)/La2/3-xLi3xTiO3 (electrolyte) Interface and its Influences on the Electrochemical Properties,” Acta Materialia, vol. 55, No. 14, pp. 4713-4722 (2007). |
Kitaoka et al., “Preparation of La0.5Li0.5TiO3 Perovskite Thin Films by the Sol-Gel Method,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 32, pp. 2063-2070 (1997). |
Kobayashi et al., “All-Solid-State Lithium Secondary Battery with Ceramic/Polymer Composite Electrolyte,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 152-153, pp. 137-142 (2002). |
Kokal et al., “Sol-gel Synthesis and Lithium Ion Conductivity of Li7La3Zr2O12 with a Garnet-Related Type Structure,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 185, pp. 42-46 (2011). |
Kotobuki et al., “Fabrication of All-Solid-State lithium battery using novel garnet type electrolyte,” ECS Meeting Abstracts (2010). |
Kotobuki et al., “Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Battery Using Ceramic Electrolyte with Honeycomb Structure by Sol-Gel Process,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 157, No. 4, pp. A493-A498 (2010). |
Kreiter et al., “Sol-gel Routes for Microporous Zirconia and Titania Membranes,” J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., vol. 48, pp. 203-211 (2008). |
Laughlin et al., “Using Sol-Gel Chemistry to Synthesize a Material with Properties Suited for Chemical Sensing,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 77-78 (2000). |
Lee et al., “The Production of LiCoO2 Cathode Thick Films for an All-Solid-State Microbattery,” Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 106-109 (2007). |
Li et al., “Developments of electrolyte systems for lithium-sulfur batteries: a review,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 1-12 (2015). |
Li et al., “Physical and Electrochemical Characterization of Amorphous Lithium Lanthanum Titanate Solid Electrolyte Fhin-Film Fabricated by e-beam Evaportation,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 515, pp. 1886-1892 (2006). |
Li et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Li ion Conducting La2/3-xLi3xTiO3 by a Polymerizable Complex Method,” Ceramics International, vol. 33, pp. 1591-1595 (2007). |
Liu et al., “Enhanced high temperature performance of LiMn204 coated with Li3B03 solid electrolyte,” Bull. Mater. Sci., vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 687-691 (2013). |
Ma, Ying, “Ceria-based Nanostructured Materials for Low-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” School of Information and Communication Technology, Functional Materials Division, Royal Institute of Technology, 52 pages (2012). |
Machida et al., “All-Solid-State Lithium Battery with LiCo0.3Ni0.7O2 Fine Powder as Cathode Materials with an Amorphous Sulfide Electrolyte,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 149, No. 6, pp. A688-A693 (2002). |
Maqueda et al., “Structural, Microstructural and Transport Properties Study of Lanthanum Lithium Titanium Perovskite Thin Films Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 516, pp. 1651-1655 (2008). |
Masset et al., “Thermal activated (thermal) battery technology Part II Molten salt electrolytes,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 164, pp. 397-414 (2007). |
Mateishina et al., “Solid-State Electrochemical Lithium Cells with Oxide Electrodes and Composite Solid Electrolyte,” Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 606-608 (2007). |
Meda et al., “Lipon Thin Films Grown by Plasma-Enhanced Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition in a N2-H2-Ar Gas Mixture,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 520, pp. 1799-1803 (2012). |
Mei et al., “Role of amorphous boundary layer in enhancing ionic conductivity of lithium-lanthanum-titanate electrolyte,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 55, pp. 2958-2963 (2010). |
Munshi, “Handbook of Solid State Batteries & Capacitors,” World Scientific, Chapters 10-12 (1995). |
Murugan et al., “Fast Lithium Ion Conduction in Garnet-Type Li7La3Zr2O12,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 46, pp. 7778-7781 (2007). |
Nagata et al., “All Solid Battery with Phosphate Compounds Made Through Sintering Process,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 174, pp. 832-837 (2007). |
Nimisha et al., “Chemical and Microstructural Modifications in LiPON Thin Films Exposed to Atmospheric Humidity,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 185, pp. 47-51 (2011). |
Office Action and Search Report dated Jan. 20, 2021 in TW Application No. 109111527 (with Brief Summary of Relevanl Portions of Office Action). |
Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,421 by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/198,421 by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Jan. 12, 2022 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/592,562, by Allie. |
Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,951 by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2018 in JP Application No. 2015-535773. |
Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2017 in CN Application No. 201380052635. |
Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,525, by Johnson. |
Zhang et al., “Study on Synthesis and Evolution of Sodium Potassium Niobate Ceramic Powders by an Oxalic Acid-Based Sol-Gel Method,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 57, pp. 31-35 (2011). |
International Search Report dated May 3, 2022 in International Application No. PCT/US2022/011012. |
Office Action dated May 16, 2022 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/838,706, by Johnson. |
Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2022 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/918,647, by Johnson. |
Obrovac et al, “Reversible Cycling of Crystalline Silicon Powder,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 154, No. 2, pp. A103-A108 (2007). |
Limthongkul et al, “Electrochemically-Driven Solid State Amorphization in Lithium-Silicon Alloys and Implications for Lithium Storage,” Acta Materialia, vol. 51, pp. 1103-1113 (2003). |
Datta et al, “Silicon and Carbon Based Composite Anodes for Lithium Ion Batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 158, pp. 557-563 (2006). |
Read et al, “Characterization of the Lithium/Oxygen Organic Electrolyte Battery,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 149, No. 9, pp. A1190-A1195 (2002). |
Abraham et al, “A Polymer Electrolyte-Based Rechargeable Lithium/Oxygen Battery,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 143, No. 1, pp. 1-5 (1996). |
Miles et al, “Cation Effects on the Electrode Reduction of Molten Nitrates,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 127, pp. 1761-1766 (1980). |
Briant et al, “Ionic Conductivity in Lithium and Lithium-Sodium Beta Alumina,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 128, No. 9, pp. 1830-1834 (1981). |
Wang et al, “Ionic Conductivities and Structure of Lithium Phosporus Oxynitride Glasses,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 183, pp. 297-306 (1995). |
Kotobuki et al, “Fabrication of All-Solid-State Lithium Battery with Lithium Metal Anode Using Al2O3-Added Li7La3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolyte,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 196, pp. 7750-7754 (2011). |
Kotobuki et al, “Compatibility of Li7La3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolyte to All-Solid-State Battery Using Li Metal Anode,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 157, No. 10, pp. A1076-A1079 (2010). |
Miles, Melvin H., “Lithium Batteries Using Molten Nitrate Electrolytes,” Battery Conference on Applications and Advances. The Fourteenth Annual, pp. 39-42 (1999). |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 16, 2017 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2017/014035. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 2, 2018 in International Application No. PCT/US2017/014035. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62281875 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15408991 | Jan 2017 | US |
Child | 16437141 | US |