The invention relates to joining mechanisms, and particularly to mechanisms for joining turbine vane airfoils to platforms.
Turbine engines have one or more circular arrays of stationary vanes that direct a working gas against corresponding circular arrays of rotating blades. A vane is an airfoil attached at each end to a platform member. This attachment must be strong enough to support cantilever and rotational forces on the vane exerted by the working gas. One assembly method is to cast one or more vanes integrally between inner and outer platform members to form what is called a vane segment or nozzle segment. However, such an integral assembly cannot be disassembled for service. Reversible joining methods are preferred for disassembly and replacement of sub-component pieces for repair or replacement. Threaded bolts and nuts can be used to attach vanes to platforms and allow disassembly. However, threaded fasteners can loosen during operational vibrations. Pin-type fasteners can be used, but they do not draw the vane against the platform, which is desirable to resist shifting and to prevent vibration. Pins and other mechanical fasteners may require precisely machined mating surfaces, yet they still may vibrate, shift, or loosen during service.
U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2005/0254942 A1 of the present assignee teaches a joining method for assembling components in which a first ceramic matrix composite (CMC) component is fabricated and fired to a selected first cured state. A second CMC element is fabricated and left in a green state, or is fired to a second partially cured state less complete than that of the first cured state. The two CMC elements are joined in a mating interface, and are then fired together, resulting in differential shrinkage that compresses the outer joining portion on the inner joining portion, locking them together. This mechanism and method is useful for securing the end of a vane in place relative to a platform element after the two pieces are urged together by another mechanism.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
As shown in
The “non-threaded” aspect of the contact surface 42 means that it is not defined by helical threads. It may instead be defined by conic geometries as later described. This permanently interlocks ring element with the stem, so the ring element cannot loosen like a threaded nut. However, unlike an integral casting, the parts 22, 30 can be disengaged for repair or replacement by cutting the disposable and replaceable ring element. This provides advantages of both permanent and releasable joining mechanisms.
As shown in
The non-threaded contact surface 42 may be formed by a groove 38 in a lateral surface 37 of the stem 34. The groove may have a proximal surface 40 that does not contact the ring element 44 during at least a first portion of the shrinkage process, so that the stem 34 can be drawn upward to create tension F. The distal surface 48 of the ring element may match the angle of the non-threaded contact surface 42 within 5 degrees, and especially within 1 degree therebetween in a plane of the axis 35, in order to distribute contact stress.
Herein, “distal” and “proximal” are relative to the shoulder 32 from which the stem extends, for example an end of an airfoil. Herein, “lateral surface envelope” means the side surface geometry of the stem 34 not including the groove 38, and defines the lateral limits of the stem, which may be cylindrical or non-cylindrical. A “generalized cone” is a surface created by the set of lines passing through a vertex and every point on a base perimeter, which may be any closed convex curve, including a circle, an ellipse, and a polygon. A closed convex curve is a closed curve or closed series of line segments that intersects a straight line at not more than two points. An elliptical cone has an elliptical base perimeter. A circular cone has a circular base perimeter.
The joining mechanism 20 may be produced by forming the second part 30 and the stem 34 of a first sinterable material such as a metal powder; sintering the second part and the stem; forming the ring element 44 of either the first sinterable material or a second sinterable material; processing the ring element 44 to a first rigid state such as a partly sintered or partially compacted metal powder; disposing the ring element around the sintered stem; and sintering the ring element to shrink it relative to the stem.
The size of the ring element 44 can be adjusted to exert the required amount of force. Additionally, an operational coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch can be used to apply additional force by selecting appropriate different materials for the ring element and the stem. The ring element may be formed of a material that sinters at temperatures below the insipient melting temperature of the first and second parts 22, 30. For example, the first and second parts 22, 30 may be made of a alloys such as Ni-based superalloys (for example IN939, CM247LC, CMSX-4), or Co-based superalloys, or FeCrAlY materials, or Fe-based Oxide Dispersion Strengthened alloys (for example PM-2000), and the ring element 44 may be made of relatively sinterable materials such as pure nickel, 17-4 stainless steel, or higher melting temperature alloys having additives such as boron to suppress the melting or sintering temperature.
Full densification of the ring element 44 is not essential for joint strength, since the size of the ring can be adjusted. Thus, lower sintering temperatures may be possible. For typical sintered metal compacts, shrinkages of 15-25% are common, depending on powder size & distribution, green density, and sintering temperature. Such shrinkage amounts can be used effectively to close tolerance gaps and affect preloading 33 of the joint.
The present joining method produces a tight joint that prevents shifting and vibration. The joint elements do not require close machine tolerances, since the ring element 44 shrinks to fit the stem 34, thus removing initial clearance. This joint cannot loosen as with threaded joints, but can be disassembled, unlike integral casting and other permanent joining mechanisms.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Development for this invention was supported in part by Contract No. DE-FC26-05NT42644 regarding Advanced Hydrogen Turbine Development, awarded by the United States Department of Energy. Accordingly, the United States Government may have certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2477375 | Jablonsky | Jul 1949 | A |
3137602 | Lincoln | Jun 1964 | A |
3854189 | Ezis et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3910716 | Roughgarden et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4330568 | Boehm et al. | May 1982 | A |
4396349 | Hueber | Aug 1983 | A |
4501053 | Craig et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4519745 | Rosman et al. | May 1985 | A |
4530884 | Erickson et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4563125 | Boudigues et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4563128 | Rossmann | Jan 1986 | A |
4629397 | Schweitzer | Dec 1986 | A |
4639189 | Rosman | Jan 1987 | A |
4643636 | Libertini et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4645421 | Huether | Feb 1987 | A |
4768924 | Carrier et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4790721 | Morris et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4838031 | Cramer | Jun 1989 | A |
4907946 | Ciokajlo et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5027604 | Krueger | Jul 1991 | A |
5062767 | Worley et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5226789 | Donges | Jul 1993 | A |
5306554 | Harrison et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5314309 | Blakeley et al. | May 1994 | A |
5328331 | Bunker et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5358379 | Pepperman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5375978 | Evans et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382453 | Mason | Jan 1995 | A |
5439627 | De Jager | Aug 1995 | A |
5484258 | Isburgh et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5493855 | Walters et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5494402 | Glezer et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5584652 | Shaffer et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5605046 | Liang | Feb 1997 | A |
5616001 | Boyd | Apr 1997 | A |
5630700 | Olsen et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640767 | Jackson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5720597 | Wang et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5791879 | Fitzgerald et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797725 | Rhodes | Aug 1998 | A |
5820337 | Jackson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5881775 | Owen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887332 | Champenois et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6000906 | Draskovich | Dec 1999 | A |
6164903 | Kouris | Dec 2000 | A |
6197424 | Morrison et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200092 | Koschier | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241469 | Beeck et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6325593 | Darkins, Jr. et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6368663 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6451416 | Holowczak et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6514046 | Morrison et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6617013 | Morrison et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6648597 | Widrig et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6807721 | Choo et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7093359 | Morrison et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7278150 | Hisamoto | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7380798 | Wolters | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7413700 | Merrill et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7563071 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7926162 | Wolters | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8061977 | Keller et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20030207155 | Morrison et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223861 | Morrison et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050254942 | Morrison et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20080104820 | Wolters | May 2008 | A1 |
20080107521 | Morrison et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080284059 | Merrill et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110041313 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |