1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates generally to subsurface oil and gas wells, and in particular, to an apparatus and method for accessing targeted subterranean rock formations by use of liner joints, pup joints, or couplings incorporating one or more mechanically-induced weak points.
2. Description of the Related Art
Hydraulic fracturing is typically employed to create additional passageways or otherwise increase the permeability of underground rock formations to facilitate flow through the formation to a producing well. Typically, fracturing may be accomplished by injecting a fluid containing sand or other proppant under sufficient pressure to create fractures in the rock. In cases where a well has a well liner or casing installed, the well liner is typically perforated prior to fracturing. Perforation helps create one or more holes through the liner or casing and into a targeted rock formation, through which a fracturing fluid may be injected. The perforating and fracturing steps are carried out at one or more predetermined depths in the well to access the targeted rock formations.
Perforation may be accomplished by one of several known methods. For example, perforation may be carried out by injecting abrasive fluids under high pressure to cut a hole through the liner or casing. Another known method of perforation is carried out by lowering an explosive charge within the wellbore to the predetermined depth and detonating the charge, thereby penetrating the well liner or casing. An alternative to perforating is accomplished by dropping one or more actuating balls down the wellbore and increasing pressure in the well, which opens ports in the liner by mechanically activating them.
Known perforation methods may have certain disadvantages associated with them. For example, when perforating with abrasive fluid, the fluid is typically pumped down the well to the perforation location(s), circulated to the surface, re-mixed, and recycled down the well again. Carrying out an abrasive fluid perforation operation generally uses a large amount of fluid, which increases costs, such as costs to transport the fluid to and from the well location. Such transportation costs may increase substantially for wells at isolated locations or on rough terrain.
One disadvantage of using explosive charges is that this method of perforation may present safety concerns in transporting, storing, and preparing the explosive charges. Taking proper measures to mitigate such safety concerns may increase the costs associated with using explosive charges. Another disadvantage of using explosive charges is that the explosion may leave debris within the rock formation, which could potentially restrict the flow of production fluid through the targeted rock formation and into the well, thereby decreasing production.
The ball-drop method employs at least one ball seat and a corresponding port set at depths within a well near a targeted rock formation. In the ball-drop method, an actuating ball is dropped down the well from the surface and landed in its corresponding ball seat. For multiple ports within a well, each ball seat may be larger than other ball seats located down the well. Different-sized actuating balls correspond to different-sized ports in the well. In other words, the smallest actuating ball corresponds to the lowest port in the well, and each port above corresponds to a larger-sized actuating ball. When an actuating ball lands in its corresponding ball seat, it forms a seal. Fluid is pumped down the well creating a pressure differential across the seal formed by the actuating ball and ball seat. The pressure differential causes a sleeve to slide axially, which opens the corresponding port, thereby allowing access to the targeted rock formation. One potential disadvantage of this method is that it is not compatible with cemented well casings; thus it is typically employed in open hole wells. Open hole packers are typically used within open hole wells, which add significant equipment expenses compared to wells with cemented casing.
Another potential disadvantage of the ball-drop method is that each actuating ball is larger than the actuating ball(s) that correspond with the port(s) lower in the well. As a result, a practical limit exists to the quantity of ball-activated ports a well can have because of the size restrictions of the wellbore and actuating balls. Another potential disadvantage of the ball-drop method is that after dropping an actuating ball down the well and opening a port, the ball is typically milled out to allow for production from the well. Milling out each actuating ball may be time-consuming and costly.
The present disclosure is directed to overcoming, or at least reducing the effects of, one or more of the problems set forth above.
An embodiment of the present disclosure is directed to a liner segment having a wall and a mechanically-induced weak point on the wall. The wall forms an inner bore and an outer surface. The mechanically-induced weak point is adapted to rupture at a predetermined pressure differential between the inner bore and the outer surface. The mechanically-induced weak point permits communication between the inner bore and the outer surface after the mechanically-induced weak point has ruptured.
The mechanically-induced weak point may be selected from the group consisting of a machined weakness, a blow-out plug, a burst disc, and a soluble plug. The mechanically-induced weak point may further include a port adapted to permit communication between the inner bore and the outer surface. The liner segment may include a coupling device. The liner segment may have centralizer ribs. The mechanically-induced weak point may be located on an outward-facing surface of at least one centralizer rib.
Another embodiment of the present disclosure is directed to a liner segment having a wall, a port on the wall, and a soluble plug. The wall forms an inner bore and an outer surface. The port on the wall is adapted to permit communication between the inner bore and the outer surface. The soluble plug is adapted to selectively prevent communication through the port. The soluble plug may comprise acid-soluble material.
Another embodiment of the present disclosure is directed to a method of well completion comprising hydraulically isolating an internal length of a wellbore liner that includes a mechanically-induced weak point, pumping a treatment medium into the hydraulically-isolated wellbore length, and increasing the pressure of the treatment medium within the hydraulically-isolated wellbore length to a predetermined pressure, thereby causing the mechanically-induced weak point to burst. The method may include locating the wellbore liner segment having the mechanically-induced weak point at a location in the well.
Yet another embodiment of the present disclosure is directed to a method of well completion comprising hydraulically isolating an internal length of a wellbore liner that includes a plug made of soluble material, and pumping a treatment medium into the hydraulically-isolated wellbore length, thereby causing the plug to partially dissolve. The method may include locating the wellbore liner segment having the plug at a location in the well. The plug may comprise an acid-soluble material. The treatment medium may comprise an acid-based solution. The method may further include increasing the pressure of the treatment medium within the hydraulically-isolated wellbore length, thereby causing the partially-dissolved plug to burst.
This disclosure may be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals identify like elements, and in which:
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
The present disclosure relates to apparatus and methods for accessing targeted subterranean rock formations 170 (depicted in
In the embodiment shown in
A desired blow-out pressure differential may be determined by factoring an assortment of variables of the well, such as hydrostatic pressure, temperature, rock properties, cement type, and surface pumping pressure. A wide range of blow-out pressure differentials is obtainable, thereby allowing the well operator to meet specific needs and circumstances of the well.
The liner joint 10 may be selectively adapted to cause the machined weakness 20 to rupture after the pressure inside the liner joint 10 has exceeded the pressure outside the liner joint 10 by at least the desired blow-out pressure differential. When the machined weakness 20 ruptures, a hole is created that allows communication between the inside of the liner joint 10 and the targeted rock formation 170.
As depicted in
Some embodiments of the liner joint 10 include a mechanically-induced weak point 200 that comprises a pass-through port 40 (not depicted in
The mechanically-induced weak point 200 may be designed for unidirectional pressure blow-out. For example, the mechanically-induced weak point 200 may be adapted to burst if the internal pressure exceeds the external pressure by the predetermined blow-out pressure differential, but not burst if the external pressure is greater than the internal pressure.
Some embodiments of the liner joint 10 comprise multiple mechanically-induced weak points 200. The mechanically-induced weak points 200 may be oriented in a pre-determined fashion on the liner joint 10. For example, the mechanically-induced weak points 200 may be distributed in a radially-symmetrical fashion or along a helical line around the outer surface of the liner joint 10, or in any other conceivable pattern on the liner joint 10. A well operator may choose the distribution and location of machined weaknesses 10 to fit the circumstances of the targeted rock formation 170.
In some embodiments, a pup joint or short liner segment comprises one or more mechanically-induced weak points 200 as described above. Other similar liner components or joint types that comprise mechanically-induced weak points 200 fall under the scope of this disclosure.
In the embodiment depicted in
In some embodiments, the blow-out plug 50 is manufactured from soluble material adapted to selectively dissolve in certain media. For example, a liner joint 10, liner joint coupling device 30, or pup joint may include an acid-soluble blow-out plug 50 that is adapted to dissolve when an acid-based fluid is circulated through the inside or outside of the liner joint 10 or liner joint coupling device 30. Such an acid-soluble blow-out plug 50 may allow communication through the port 40 after dissolution. Alternatively, the soluble blow-out plug 50 may be adapted to partially dissolve in the presence of certain solutions, which partial dissolution effectively lowers the blow-out pressure differential of the blow-out plug 50 to a predetermined blow-out pressure differential.
In the embodiment depicted in
As depicted in
In the embodiment depicted in
Referring now to
As depicted in
In open hole wells, as depicted in
Referring now to
Certain mechanically-induced weak points 200 may be adapted to burst at higher or lower blow-out pressure differentials than other weak points 200. As a result, some weak points 200 may be selectively burst without bursting others. Further, pressures external to the liner may differ throughout the well; thus the pressure differential may vary even if the internal pressure is uniform. As will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure, a mechanically-induced weak point 200 may be any structure, such as a burst disc 140, blow-out plug 50, or soluble plug 50 that is adapted to burst, rupture, or fail, thereby permitting communication between the inside and outside of the liner 300 at a predetermined pressure differential.
In operation of systems where one or more blow-out plugs 50 are manufactured from soluble material, for example an acid-soluble blow-out plug 50, a dissolving medium may be pumped down the well to the soluble plug 50, which may completely or partially dissolve one or more soluble blow-out plugs 50. Upon partial dissolution of the blow-out plugs 50, the dissolving medium or a different treatment fluid may be circulated at higher pressure to burst the partially-dissolved blow-out plugs 50 from the port 40, thereby permitting communication between the inside and outside of the liner 300.
In operation, after bursting one or more mechanically-induced weak points 200, the internal liner packers 152 may be deactivated and run to a new location in the liner 300, to straddle and selectively burst additional mechanically-induced weak points 200. Treatment fluid pressure inside the liner 300 is increased to burst the mechanically-induced weak point(s) 200 as described above. This process may be repeated as many times as desired or needed to burst multiple mechanically-induced weak points 200 installed in the wellbore 100.
Referring now to
As will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure, after the mechanically-induced weak points 200 are burst or opened, access to the targeted rock formation 170 may allow treatment of the targeted rock formation 170 using methods already known in the art.
While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention covers the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application claims benefit to U.S. Provisional Patent Ser. No. 61/221,414, filed on Jun. 29, 2009 by Lyle Laun, and titled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTI-STAGE HYDRAULIC FRACTURE STIMULATING BY USE OF A LINER JOINT OR PUP JOINT INCORPORATING A MECHANICALLY INDUCED WEAK POINT (MACHINED WEAKNESS, BLOW-OUT PLUG(S), OR ACID SOLUABLE PLUG(S) INSTALLED) OR A LINER JOINT COUPLING DEVICE INCORPORATING A SIMILAR STYLE OF MECHANICALLY INDUCED WEAK POINT,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61221414 | Jun 2009 | US |