As demand for wireless communication spectrum continues to increase, for example demand associated with applications executing on smart phones, spectrum shortages may occur. Spectrum shortages may detrimentally affect the performance of such applications. Techniques may be implemented to mitigate the impact of such spectrum shortages.
One approach to mitigating such spectrum shortages is to increase the density of spectrum available to wireless communication devices. For example, spectrum density may be increased by implementing heterogeneous, multi-tiered networks. Such heterogeneous networks may include a number of distributed macrocell base stations (BS). Within the coverage area of a macrocell, one or more other sources of wireless communication spectrum may be defined, such as one or more femtocells, picocells, microcells, remote radio heads, and the like.
Signals transmitted on the backhaul links of a cloud radio access network may be compressed using joint compression encoding, for example as described herein. The example joint compression encoding may be performed using a successive estimation-compression architecture. The example joint compression encoding may include designing precoding matrices that may be used with signal compression. The example joint compression encoding may be applied to signals transmitted on the downlink of the cloud radio access network. One or more baseband signals to be delivered over the backhaul links may be jointly compressed using multivariate compression. Multivariate compression may be implemented using successive compression based on a sequence of minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimations and per BS compression.
An example central encoding device may include a processor and a memory comprising instructions. The example central encoding device may be associated with a cloud radio access network. The instructions, when executed by the processor, may cause the example central encoding device to perform one or more of the following. The central encoding device may precode a first signal into a first precoded signal and to precode a second signal into a second precoded signal. The central encoding device may quantize the first precoded signal into a first quantized signal. The central encoding device may generate an MMSE estimate based on the first quantized first signal and the second precoded signal. The central encoding device may quantize the second precoded signal into a second quantized signal. Quantizing the second precoded signal may include applying the MMSE estimate to the second precoded signal. The central encoding device may transmit the first and second quantized signals. The central encoding device may design a first optimized precoding matrix for the first signal and to apply the first optimized precoding matrix to the first signal while precoding the first signal.
As shown in
The communications systems 100 may also include a base station 114a and a base station 114b. Each of the base stations 114a, 114b may be any type of device configured to wirelessly interface with at least one of the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c. 102d to facilitate access to one or more communication networks, such as the core network 106/107/109, the Internet 110, and/or the networks 112. By way of example, the base stations 114a, 114b may be a base transceiver station (BTS), a Node-B, an eNode B, a Home Node B, a Home eNode B, a site controller, an access point (AP), a wireless router, and the like. While the base stations 114a, 114b are each depicted as a single element, it will be appreciated that the base stations 114a. 114b may include any number of interconnected base stations and/or network elements.
The base station 114a may be part of the RAN 103/104/105, which may also include other base stations and/or network elements (not shown), such as a base station controller (BSC), a radio network controller (RNC), relay nodes, etc. The base station 114a and/or the base station 114b may be configured to transmit and/or receive wireless signals within a particular geographic region, which may be referred to as a cell (not shown). The cell may further be divided into cell sectors. For example, the cell associated with the base station 114a may be divided into three sectors. Thus, in one embodiment, the base station 114a may include three transceivers. i.e., one for each sector of the cell. In an embodiment, the base station 114a may employ multiple-input multiple output (MIMO) technology and, therefore, may utilize multiple transceivers for each sector of the cell.
The base stations 114a, 114b may communicate with one or more of the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c, 102d over an air interface 115/116/117, which may be any suitable wireless communication link (e.g., radio frequency (RF), microwave, infrared (IR), ultraviolet (UV), visible light, etc.). The air interface 115/116/117 may be established using any suitable radio access technology (RAT).
More specifically, as noted above, the communications system 100 may be a multiple access system and may employ one or more channel access schemes, such as CDMA, TDMA, FDMA, OFDMA, SC-FDMA, and the like. For example, the base station 114a in the RAN 103/104/105 and the WTRUs 102a, 102b. 102c may implement a radio technology such as Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA), which may establish the air interface 115/116/117 using wideband CDMA (WCDMA). WCDMA may include communication protocols such as High-Speed Packet Access (HSPA) and/or Evolved HSPA (HSPA+). HSPA may include High-Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) and/or High-Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA).
In an embodiment, the base station 114a and the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c may implement a radio technology such as Evolved UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA), which may establish the air interface 115/116/117 using Long Term Evolution (LTE) and/or LTE-Advanced (LTE-A).
In an embodiment, the base station 114a and the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c may implement radio technologies such as IEEE 802.16 (i.e., Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX)), CDMA2000, CDMA2000 1×, CDMA2000 EV-DO, Interim Standard 2000 (IS-2000), Interim Standard 95 (IS-95), Interim Standard 856 (IS-856), Global System for Mobile communications (GSM). Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE). GSM EDGE (GERAN), and the like.
The base station 114b in
The RAN 103/104/105 may be in communication with the core network 106/107/109, which may be any type of network configured to provide voice, data, applications, and/or voice over internet protocol (VoIP) services to one or more of the WTRUs 102a, 102b. 102c, 102d. For example, the core network 106/107/109 may provide call control, billing services, mobile location-based services, pre-paid calling, Internet connectivity, video distribution, etc., and/or perform high-level security functions, such as user authentication. Although not shown in
The core network 106/107/109 may also serve as a gateway for the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c, 102d to access the PSTN 108, the Internet 110, and/or other networks 112. The PSTN 108 may include circuit-switched telephone networks that provide plain old telephone service (POTS). The Internet 110 may include a global system of interconnected computer networks and devices that use common communication protocols, such as the transmission control protocol (TCP), user datagram protocol (UDP) and the internet protocol (IP) in the TCP/IP internet protocol suite. The networks 112 may include wired or wireless communications networks owned and/or operated by other service providers. For example, the networks 112 may include a core network connected to one or more RANs, which may employ the same RAT as the RAN 103/104/105 or a different RAT.
Some or all of the WTRUs 102a. 102b, 102c, 102d in the communications system 100 may include multi-mode capabilities, i.e., the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c, 102d may include multiple transceivers for communicating with different wireless networks over different wireless links. For example, the WTRU 102c shown in
The processor 118 may be a general purpose processor, a special purpose processor, a conventional processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in association with a DSP core, a controller, a microcontroller, Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGAs) circuits, any other type of integrated circuit (IC), a state machine, and the like. The processor 118 may perform signal coding, data processing, power control, input/output processing, and/or any other functionality that enables the WTRU 102 to operate in a wireless environment. The processor 118 may be coupled to the transceiver 120, which may be coupled to the transmit/receive element 122. While
A processor, such as the processor 118, may include integrated memory (e.g., WTRU 102 may include a chipset that includes a processor and associated memory). Memory may refer to memory that is integrated with a processor (e.g., processor 118) or memory that is otherwise associated with a device (e.g., WTRU 102). The memory may be non-transitory. The memory may include (e.g., store) instructions that may be executed by the processor (e.g., software and/or firmware instructions). For example, the memory may include instructions that when executed may cause the processor to implement one or more of the implementations described herein.
The transmit/receive element 122 may be configured to transmit signals to, or receive signals from, a base station (e.g., the base station 114a) over the air interface 115/116/117. For example, in one embodiment, the transmit/receive element 122 may be an antenna configured to transmit and/or receive RF signals. In an embodiment, the transmit/receive element 122 may be an emitter/detector configured to transmit and/or receive IR, UV, or visible light signals, for example. In yet an embodiment, the transmit/receive element 122 may be configured to transmit and receive both RF and light signals. It will be appreciated that the transmit/receive element 122 may be configured to transmit and/or receive any combination of wireless signals.
In addition, although the transmit/receive element 122 is depicted in
The transceiver 120 may be configured to modulate the signals that are to be transmitted by the transmit/receive element 122 and to demodulate the signals that are received by the transmit/receive element 122. As noted above, the WTRU 102 may have multi-mode capabilities. Thus, the transceiver 120 may include multiple transceivers for enabling the WTRU 102 to communicate via multiple RATs, such as UTRA and IEEE 802.11, for example.
The processor 118 of the WTRU 102 may be coupled to, and may receive user input data from, the speaker/microphone 124, the keypad 126, and/or the display/touchpad 128 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) display unit or organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display unit). The processor 118 may also output user data to the speaker/microphone 124, the keypad 126, and/or the display/touchpad 128. In addition, the processor 118 may access information from, and store data in, any type of suitable memory, such as the non-removable memory 130, the removable memory 132, and/or memory integrated with the processor 118. The non-removable memory 130 may include random-access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), a hard disk, or any other type of memory storage device. The removable memory 132 may include a subscriber identity module (SIM) card, a memory stick, a secure digital (SD) memory card, and the like. In an embodiment, the processor 118 may access information from, and store data in, memory that is not physically located on the WTRU 102, such as on a server or a home computer (not shown).
The processor 118 may receive power from the power source 134, and may be configured to distribute and/or control the power to the other components in the WTRU 102. The power source 134 may be any suitable device for powering the WTRU 102. For example, the power source 134 may include one or more dry cell batteries (e.g., nickel-cadmium (NiCd), nickel-zinc (NiZn), nickel metal hydride (NiMH), lithium-ion (Li-ion), etc.), solar cells, fuel cells, and the like.
The processor 118 may also be coupled to the GPS chipset 136, which may be configured to provide location information (e.g., longitude and latitude) regarding the current location of the WTRU 102. In addition to, or in lieu of, the information from the GPS chipset 136, the WTRU 102 may receive location information over the air interface 115/116/117 from a base station (e.g., base stations 114a, 114b) and/or determine its location based on the timing of the signals being received from two or more nearby base stations. It will be appreciated that the WTRU 102 may acquire location information by way of any suitable location-determination method while remaining consistent with an embodiment.
The processor 118 may further be coupled to other peripherals 138, which may include one or more software and/or hardware modules that provide additional features, functionality and/or wired or wireless connectivity. For example, the peripherals 138 may include an accelerometer, an e-compass, a satellite transceiver, a digital camera (for photographs or video), a universal serial bus (USB) port, a vibration device, a television transceiver, a hands free headset, a Bluetooth® module, a frequency modulated (FM) radio unit, a digital music player, a media player, a video game player module, an Internet browser, and the like.
As shown in
The core network 106 shown in
The RNC 142a in the RAN 103 may be connected to the MSC 146 in the core network 106 via an IuCS interface. The MSC 146 may be connected to the MGW 144. The MSC 146 and the MGW 144 may provide the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c with access to circuit-switched networks, such as the PSTN 108, to facilitate communications between the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c and traditional land-line communications devices.
The RNC 142a in the RAN 103 may also be connected to the SGSN 148 in the core network 106 via an IuPS interface. The SGSN 148 may be connected to the GGSN 150. The SGSN 148 and the GGSN 150 may provide the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c with access to packet-switched networks, such as the Internet 110, to facilitate communications between and the WTRUs 102a, 102b. 102c and IP-enabled devices.
As noted above, the core network 106 may also be connected to the networks 112, which may include other wired or wireless networks that are owned and/or operated by other service providers.
The RAN 104 may include eNode-Bs 160a, 160b. 160c, though it will be appreciated that the RAN 104 may include any number of eNode-Bs while remaining consistent with an embodiment. The eNode-Bs 160a, 160b, 160c may each include one or more transceivers for communicating with the WTRUs 102a, 102b. 102c over the air interface 116. In one embodiment, the eNode-Bs 160a. 160b, 160c may implement MIMO technology. Thus, the eNode-B 160a, for example, may use multiple antennas to transmit wireless signals to, and receive wireless signals from, the WTRU 102a.
Each of the eNode-Bs 160a, 160b, 160c may be associated with a particular cell (not shown) and may be configured to handle radio resource management decisions, handover decisions, scheduling of users in the uplink and/or downlink, and the like. As shown in
The core network 107 shown in
The MME 162 may be connected to each of the eNode-Bs 160a, 160b, 160c in the RAN 104 via an S1 interface and may serve as a control node. For example, the MME 162 may be responsible for authenticating users of the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c, bearer activation/deactivation, selecting a particular serving gateway during an initial attach of the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c, and the like. The MME 162 may also provide a control plane function for switching between the RAN 104 and other RANs (not shown) that employ other radio technologies, such as GSM or WCDMA.
The serving gateway 164 may be connected to each of the eNode-Bs 160a, 160b, 160c in the RAN 104 via the S1 interface. The serving gateway 164 may generally route and forward user data packets to/from the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c. The serving gateway 164 may also perform other functions, such as anchoring user planes during inter-eNode B handovers, triggering paging when downlink data is available for the WTRUs 102a. 102b, 102c, managing and storing contexts of the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c, and the like.
The serving gateway 164 may also be connected to the PDN gateway 166, which may provide the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c with access to packet-switched networks, such as the Internet 110, to facilitate communications between the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c and IP-enabled devices.
The core network 107 may facilitate communications with other networks. For example, the core network 107 may provide the WTRUs 102a. 102b, 102c with access to circuit-switched networks, such as the PSTN 108, to facilitate communications between the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c and traditional land-line communications devices. For example, the core network 107 may include, or may communicate with, an IP gateway (e.g., an IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) server) that serves as an interface between the core network 107 and the PSTN 108. In addition, the core network 107 may provide the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c with access to the networks 112, which may include other wired or wireless networks that are owned and/or operated by other service providers.
As shown in
The air interface 117 between the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c and the RAN 105 may be defined as an R1 reference point that implements the IEEE 802.16 specification. In addition, each of the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c may establish a logical interface (not shown) with the core network 109. The logical interface between the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c and the core network 109 may be defined as an R2 reference point, which may be used for authentication, authorization, IP host configuration management, and/or mobility management.
The communication link between each of the base stations 180a, 180b, 180c may be defined as an R8 reference point that includes protocols for facilitating WTRU handovers and the transfer of data between base stations. The communication link between the base stations 180a, 180b, 180c and the ASN gateway 182 may be defined as an R6 reference point. The R6 reference point may include protocols for facilitating mobility management based on mobility events associated with each of the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c.
As shown in
The MIP-HA may be responsible for IP address management, and may enable the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c to roam between different ASNs and/or different core networks. The MIP-HA 184 may provide the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c with access to packet-switched networks, such as the Internet 110, to facilitate communications between the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c and IP-enabled devices. The AAA server 186 may be responsible for user authentication and for supporting user services. The gateway 188 may facilitate interworking with other networks. For example, the gateway 188 may provide the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c with access to circuit-switched networks, such as the PSTN 108, to facilitate communications between the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c and traditional land-line communications devices. In addition, the gateway 188 may provide the WTRUs 102a, 102b, 102c with access to the networks 112, which may include other wired or wireless networks that are owned and/or operated by other service providers.
Although not shown in
Interference management and/or cell association among various devices of heterogeneous networks may be problematic. To mitigate such problems, cloud radio access networks may be implemented. In such a network, the encoding and/or decoding functions of one or more BSs may be migrated to a central unit. The BSs in such a network may function as soft relays that interface with the central unit, for example via backhaul links that may be used to carry baseband signals. The implementation of cloud radio access networks may mitigate inter-cell interference, and/or may lower costs (e.g., costs related to the deployment and/or management of BSs).
However, such cloud radio access networks may exhibit limitations. For example, one limitation of cloud radio access networks may be the capacity limitations of respective digital backhaul links connecting the BSs to the central unit. The central unit may be configured to individually compress signals transmitted to the respective BSs. However, the efficiency of such a point-to-point compression technique may be limited.
Within the coverage area of a macrocell BS, one or more other sources of wireless communication spectrum may be defined, such as one or more femtocells, picocells, microcells, remote radio heads, and the like. As shown, a macrocell in the example cloud radio access network may include one or more small cells (e.g., picocells). A picocell may include a picocell base station (BS) that may be, for example, a multi-antenna BS. A picocell BS may be referred to as a pico BS. A cloud radio access network, such as the example cloud radio access network, may include NN multi-antenna BSs, which may include, for example, macro BSs, pico BSs, or other BSs.
The illustrated example cloud radio access network may include a central unit that may be responsible for encoding and/or decoding functions of one or more BSs of the cloud radio access network. The central unit may be referred to as a central encoder. The central encoder may be implemented as a standalone network device, or may be a logical entity (e.g., implemented on one or more network devices that may perform other functions). The central encoder may be connected to (e.g., in communication with) the BSs of the cloud radio access network via respective backhaul links. Traffic on the backhaul links may be bidirectional, such that the backhaul links may additionally, or alternatively, be referred to as fronthaul links. The backhaul links may be physical links (e.g., via fiber), wireless links (e.g., via directional microwave), or any combination thereof.
In a cloud radio access network, such as the example cloud radio access network, the BSs (e.g., the macro BSs and/or pico BSs) may operate as soft relays that interface with the central encoder, for example via the backhaul links.
As shown, the example cloud radio access network may include one or more mobile stations (MSs), such as a plurality of MSs, that may be associated with one or more BSs of the cloud radio access network. The MSs may be, for example, multi-antenna MSs. A cloud radio access network, such as the example cloud radio access network, may include NA, multi-antenna MSs. As shown, the NM mobile stations may be distributed across one or more cells of the cloud radio access network (e.g., across macrocells and/or picocells).
Signals transmitted on the backhaul links of a cloud radio access network, such as the example cloud radio access network, may be compressed using joint compression encoding, for example as described herein. The example joint compression encoding may be performed using a successive estimation-compression architecture. The example joint compression encoding may include designing precoding matrices that may be used with signal compression, such that joint design of precoding and backhaul compression may be provided. The example joint compression encoding may be applied to signals transmitted on the downlink of a cloud radio access network.
Quantization noise signals corresponding to different base stations (BSs) may be correlated with each other. Design of the correlation of the respective quantization noises across BSs may limit the effect of the resulting quantization noise seen at one or more associated mobile stations (MSs). In order to create such correlation, one or more baseband signals to be delivered over the backhaul links may be jointly compressed, for example using multivariate compression. Multivariate compression (e.g., across multiple BSs) may be implemented using successive compression that may be based on a sequence of minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimations and per BS compression.
Quantization noise signals corresponding to different BSs may be correlated with each other. The correlation of the quantization noises across the BSs may be used to limit the effect of the resulting quantization noise seen at respective MSs. In order to create such correlation, baseband signals delivered over respective backhaul links may be jointly compressed, for example using multivariate compression. Multivariate compression may be implemented without performing joint compression across the BSs (e.g., all BSs) of a cloud radio access network. For example, multivariate compression may be implemented using successive compression based on MMSE estimation and per BS compression.
The central encoder of a cloud radio access network may perform joint encoding of messages intended for one or more mobile stations (MSs) of the network, for example in the downlink of the cloud radio access network. The central encoder may compress (e.g., independently compress) respective produced baseband signals to be transmitted by one or more BSs of the network. The baseband signals may be transmitted to respective BSs, for example via corresponding backhaul links. The BSs may upconvert the received baseband signals, and may transmit the signals, for example via respective antennas, to the MSs.
A central encoder may be configured to perform dirty-paper coding (DPC) of MS signals before compression. The effect of imperfect channel state information (CSI) may be accounted for. Compute-and-forward techniques may be implemented. The backhaul links of a cloud radio access network may be used to transmit message information.
Definitions of mutual information I(X;Y) between the random variables X and Y, conditional mutual information I(X;Y|Z) between X and Y conditioned on random variable Z, differential entropy h(X) of X and conditional differential entropy h(X|Y) of X conditioned on Y may be adopted. The distribution of a random variable X may be denoted by p(x), and the conditional distribution of X conditioned on Y may be represented by p(x|y). Algorithms illustrated and describer herein, unless otherwise specified, may be in base two.
The circularly symmetric complex Gaussian distribution with mean μ and covariance matrix R may be denoted by XN(μ, R). The set of M×N complex matrices (e.g., all M×N complex matrices) may be denoted by XM×N, and E(•) may represent the expectation operator. The notation X±0 may be used to indicate that the matrix X is positive semidefinite. The notation X0 may be used to indicate that the matrix X is positive definite. Given a sequence X1, . . . , Xm, a set XΣ={Xj|jεΣ} may be defined for a subset Σ⊂{1, . . . , m}. The operation (•)† may denote Hermitian transpose of a matrix or vector. The notation Σx may be used for the correlation matrix of random vector x, e.g., Σx=E[xx†]. The cross-correlation matrix, e.g., Σx,y=E[xy†], may be represented by Σx,y. The conditional correlation matrix. e.g., Σx|y=E[xx†|y], may be represented by Σx|y.
With reference to
Based on the bits received on the backhaul links, each BS i may produce a vector xi εXn
E[∥x1∥2]≦Pl, for iεNB. (1)
Results described herein may be extended to a case with more general power constraints, for example of the form E[x†Θix]≦δl for lε{1, . . . , L}, where the matrix Θl may be a non-negative definite matrix.
Assuming flat-fading channels, the signal ykεXn
yk=Hkx+zk, (2)
where the aggregate transmit signal vector may be represented by x=[x1†, . . . , xN
Hk=└Hk,lHk,2 . . . Hk,N
where Hk,lεXn
Rk=I(sk;yk) (4)
may be achieved for each MS kεNM.
With continued reference to
{tilde over (x)}=As, (7)
where the matrix A may be factorized as
A=└A1 . . . AN
where AkεXn
{tilde over (x)}l=El†As, (9)
where the matrix EiεXn
Each precoded data stream {tilde over (x)}i for iεNB may be compressed, such that the central encoder may transmit the data stream to the i th BS through a corresponding backhaul link of capacity Cl bits per c.u. Each i th BS may forward the compressed signal xl obtained from the central encoder. The BSs may not be aware of the channel codebooks used by the central encoder, and/or of the precoding matrix A used by the central encoder. The BSs may be informed about one or more quantization codebooks. The one or more quantization codebooks may be selected by the central encoder.
Using rate-distortion considerations (e.g., standard rate-distortion considerations), a Gaussian test channel may be used to model the effect of compression on a backhaul link. The compressed signals xi to be transmitted by a BS i may be represented by
xi={tilde over (x)}l+qi. (10)
where the compression noise qi may be modeled as a complex Gaussian vector distributed as XN(0,Ωi,i). The test channel xi=Bi{tilde over (x)}i+qi may be more general than equation (10). This may be captured by adjusting the matrix A in equation (7). The vector x=[x1†, . . . , xN
x=As+q, (11)
where the compression noise q=[q1†, . . . , qN
where the matrix Ωi,j may be defined as Ωi,j=E[qiqj†], and may define correlation between the quantization noises of BS i and BS j.
With the example precoding and compression operations described herein, the achievable rate for MS k, for example represented by equation (4), may computed as:
The signals {tilde over (x)}i corresponding to each BS i may be compressed independently. This may correspond to setting Ωi,j=0 for each i≠j in equation (12). Correlated compression for the signals of different BSs may be leveraged, for example to control the effect of the additive quantization noises at the MSs. The design of the precoding matrix A and of the quantization covariance Ω may be performed separately, for example using a precoder (e.g., zero-forcing (ZF) or MMSE precoding), or may be performed jointly.
One or more BSs of a cloud radio access network may be connected to a corresponding central encoder via finite-capacity backhaul links. The precoded signals {tilde over (x)}i as represented by equation (9) for iεNB may be compressed before being communicated to the BSs, for example using the Gaussian test channels represented by equation (10). Where the compression noise signals related to the different BSs are uncorrelated, for example such that Ωi,j=0 for each i≠jεNB, the signal xi to be emitted from BS i may be communicated from the central encoder to the BS i, for example if the condition
I({tilde over (x)}i;xi)=log det(Ei†AA†Ei+Ωi,i)−log det(Ωi,i)≦Ci (15)
is satisfied for iεNB. Equation (15) may be valid, for example, if each BS i is informed about the quantization codebook used by the central encoder, as defined by the covariance matrix Ωi,i.
Correlation may be introduced among the compression noise signals, for example by setting Ωi,j≠0 for i≠j. This may control the effect of the quantization noise at the respective MSs. Correlated quantization noises may be introduced in accordance with joint compression of the precoded signals of different BSs. Compression techniques that produce descriptions with correlated compression noises may be referred to as multivariate compression. By choosing the test channel in accordance with equation (11), sufficient conditions may be obtained for the signal xi to be delivered to BS i for each iεNB. A matrix obtained by stacking the matrices Ei for iεΣ horizontally may be denoted by EΣ.
The signals x1, . . . , xN
is satisfied for each of the subsets Σ⊂NB.
The weighted sum-rate Rsum=Σk=1N
Formulations (17a), (17b), and (17c) may be referred to as problem (17). The condition of (17b) may correspond to backhaul constraints due to multivariate compression. The condition (17c) may impose transmit power constraints, for example in accordance with equation (1). The objective function Σk=1N
A successive technique, based on MMSE estimation and per BS compression, as illustrated in
The central encoder may compress the signal {tilde over (x)}π(1), for example using the test channel of equation (10), such that xπ(1)={tilde over (x)}π(1)+qπ(1), with qπ(1): XN (0,Ωπ(1),π(1)), and may transmit the bit stream describing the compressed signal xπ(1) over a respective backhaul link to a corresponding BS π(1). For other iεNB with i>1, the central encoder may obtain the compressed signal xπ(i) for BS π(i) in a successive manner in the given order π, by performing estimation and compression.
In accordance with estimation, the central encoder may obtain the MMSE estimate {circumflex over (x)}π(i) of xπ(i) given the signal {tilde over (x)}π(i) and the previously obtained compressed signals xπ(1), . . . , xπ(i−1). This estimate may be represented by
where the vector may be represented by uπ(i)=[xπ(i)†, . . . , xπ(i−1)†, {tilde over (x)}π(i)†]†, and the correlation matrices Σx
with ΩΣ,T=Σ†ΩET for subsets Σ, T⊂NB, and the set Σπ,l defined as Zπ,i≈{π(1), . . . , π(i)}.
In accordance with compression, the central encoder may compress the MMSE estimate {circumflex over (x)}π(i) to obtain xπ(i) using the test channel
xπ(i)={circumflex over (x)}π(i)+{circumflex over (q)}π(i), (21)
where the quantization noise {circumflex over (q)}π(i) may be independent of the estimate {circumflex over (x)}π(i), and may be distributed as {circumflex over (q)}π(i): XN(0, Σx
The first equality in equation (22) may follow, for example, if the MMSE estimate {circumflex over (x)}π(i) may be a sufficient statistic for the estimation of xπ(i) from uπ(i). The compression rate I({circumflex over (x)}π(i);xπ(i)), which may be used by the test channel of equation (21), may be represented by:
To illustrate, in an example of multivariate compression based on successive MMSE estimation and per base station compression, a cloud radio access network may include a central encoder and three base stations (e.g., such that NB=3) that may be connected to the central encoder via respective backhaul links. The central encoder may receive first, second, and third signals (e.g., xπ(1), xπ(2), xπ(3)) that correspond to the first, second, and third base stations, respectively. The central encoder may precode the first, second, and third signals into respective, first, second, and third precoded signals (e.g., {tilde over (x)}π(1), {tilde over (x)}π(2), {tilde over (x)}π(3)).
The central encoder may quantize (e.g., compress) the first signal into a first quantized signal. The central encoder may generate a first MMSE estimate that may be based on the quantized first signal and the second precoded signal. The central encoder may quantize the second precoded signal into a second quantized signal. The first MMSE estimate may be applied during quantization of the second precoded signal. The central encoder may generating a second MMSE estimate that may be based on the first quantized first signal, the second quantized signal, and the third precoded signal. The second MMSE estimate may be applied during quantization of the third precoded signal. The central encoder may transmit the first, second, and third quantized signals.
In an example, the precoding matrix A and the compression covariance Rf may be jointly improved (e.g., optimized), for example by solving equations (17). In another example, the precoding matrix may be fixed, for example by using ZF, MMSE, or weighted sum-rate maximizing precoding by neglecting the compression noise, and the compression noise matrix Ω may be improved (e.g., optimized).
With reference to the above illustrated example, precoding the first, second, and third signals may include designing respective optimized precoding matrices for the first, second, and third signals, and applying the optimized precoding matrices to the first, second, and third signals. Precoding the first signal and quantizing the first precoded signal may be performed concurrently, precoding the second signal and quantizing the second precoded signal may be performed concurrently, and precoding the third signal and quantizing the third precoded signal may be performed concurrently, for example in succession.
The optimization of problem (17) may be non-convex. The variables Rk≈AkAk† may be defined for kεNM. The functions ƒk({Rj}j=1N
The algorithm may be summarized as, for example where the functions ƒk′({Rj(t+1)}j=1N
with the function φ(X,Y) represented by
An example MM algorithm for problem (17) may include performing one or more of the following processes. First, the matrices {Rk}k=1N
Second, the matrices {Rk(t+1)}k=1N
Third if a convergence criterion is not satisfied, t may be set to t←t+1 and the second process of updating the matrices {Rk(t+1)}k=1N
Fourth, precoding matricies Ak←VkDk1/2 may be calculated for kεNM, where Dk is a diagonal matrix whose diagonal elements may be the nonzero eigenvalues of Rk(t), and the columns of Vk are the corresponding eigenvectors.
Given the solution (A, Ω), for example as obtained with the example algorithm, the central encoder may perform joint compression to obtain the signals xi to be transmitted by the BSs. If one or more subsets of the inequalities in (17b) are satisfied with equality, and the one or more subsets correspond to the subsets Σ={π(1)}, {π(1), π(2)}, . . . , {π(1), . . . , π(NB)} for a given permutation π, the successive estimation-compression structure of
A weighted sum-rate maximization with independent quantization noises may be formulated as problem (17) with additional constraints represented by
Ωi,j=0, for all i≠jεNB. (29)
The constraints (29) are affine, and the example MM algorithm may be applicable by setting to zero matrices Ωi,j=0 for i≠j.
The central encoder may have information about the global channel matrices Hk for kεNM. In the presence of uncertainty at the central encoder regarding the channel matrices Hk for kεNM, a robust design of the precoding matrix A and the compression covariance Ω may be implemented. Deterministic, worst-case optimization may be described under different uncertainty models, for example a singular value uncertainty model or an ellipsoidal uncertainty model. The singular value uncertainty model may be related via appropriate bounds to normed uncertainty on the channel matrices. The ellipsoidal uncertainty model may be more accurate when knowledge of the covariance matrix of the CSI error, due, for example, to estimation, is available.
Deterministic worst-case optimization may be described under a singular value uncertainty model. Considering a multiplicative uncertainty model, the actual channel matrix Hk toward each MS k may be modeled as
Hk=Ĥk(I+Δk), (30)
where the matrix Ĥk may be the CSI known at the central encoder, and the matrix ΔkεXn
σmax(Δk)≦εk<1, (31)
where σmax(X) may be the largest singular value of matrix X. The worst-case weighted sum-rate may be maximized over each of the possible uncertainty matrices Δk for kεNM, subject to the backhaul capacity (17b) and power constraints (17c), for example
Formulations (32a), (32b), and (32c) may be referred to as problem (32). The problem (32) may be equivalent to the problem (17), with the channel matrix Hk replaced with (1−εk)Ĥk for kεNM. Based on this, the problem (32) may be solved by using the MM algorithm, with a change of the channel matrices from {Hk}k=1N
Deterministic worst-case optimization may be described under an ellipsoidal uncertainty model. In an example ellipsoidal uncertainty model, a multiple-input single-output (MISO) case may be used, where each MS may be equipped with a single antenna, such that nM,k=1 for kεNM. The channel vector corresponding to each MS k may be denoted by Hk=hk†εX1×n
hk=ĥk+ek, (33)
with ĥk and ek being the presumed CSI available at the central encoder and the CSI error, respectively. The error vector ek may be assumed to be bounded within an ellipsoidal region that may be described as
ek†Ckek≦1, (34)
for kεNM with the matrix Ck0 specifying a size and shape of the ellipsoid.
A dual problem of power minimization under signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) constraints for each of the MSs, may be stated as:
where the coefficients μi≧0 are arbitrary weights, Γk may be the SINR constraint for MS k, and Rk≈AkAk† for kεNM. Formulations (35a), (35b), and (35c) may be referred to as problem (35). Problem (35) may have an infinite number of constraints is (35b). Following the S-procedure, the constraints of (35b) may be translated into a finite number of linear constraints by introducing auxiliary variables βk for kεNM.
The constraints (35b) may hold if constants, {βk≧0}k=1N
is satisfied for each of the kεNM, where Θk=Rk−ΓkΣjεN
By transforming the constraint (35b) into the condition (36), a resulting problem may fall in the class of DC problems. An MM algorithm, for example similar to the MM algorithm described herein, may be derived by linearizing the non-convex terms in the constraint (35c). The algorithm may converge to a stationary point of problem (35).
Design of precoding and compression may be performed separately. The precoding matrix A may be fixed, for example in accordance with ZF precoding, MMSE precoding, or weighted sum-rate maximizing precoding by neglecting compression noise. The compression covariance Ω may be designed separately, so as to maximize the weighted sum-rate.
The precoding matrix A may be selected according to a criterion (e.g., a standard criterion), by neglecting the compression noise. The precoding matrix A may be designed by assuming a reduced power constraint, for example γiPi for some γiε(0,1), for iεNB. The power offset factor γiε(0,1) may be used. The final signal xi transmitted by each BS i may be represented by equation (10), and may be the sum of the precoded signal Ej†As and the compression noise ql. If the power of the precoded part El†As is selected to be equal to the power constraint Pi, the compression noise power may be forced to be zero. This may be possible when the backhaul capacity may grow to infinity, for example due to (17b). To make the compression feasible, the parameters γi, . . . , γN
Having fixed the precoding matrix A, the problem may reduce to solving problem (17) with respect to the compression covariance Ω. The obtained problem may be a DC problem which may be solved, for example, using the example MM algorithm described herein, by limiting the optimization to matrix Ω. This problem may not be feasible if the parameters γi, iεNB, are too large. These parameters may be set using one or more search strategies, such as bisection.
In
Although features and elements are described above in particular combinations, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that each feature or element may be used alone or in any combination with the other features and elements. In addition, the methods described herein may be implemented in a computer program, software, or firmware incorporated in a computer-readable medium for execution by a computer or processor. Examples of computer-readable media include electronic signals (transmitted over wired or wireless connections) and computer-readable storage media. Examples of computer-readable storage media include, but are not limited to, a read only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a register, cache memory, semiconductor memory devices, magnetic media such as internal hard disks and removable disks, magneto-optical media, optical media such as CD-ROM disks, and digital versatile disks (DVDs). A processor in association with software may be used to implement a radio frequency transceiver for use in a WTRU, terminal, base station, RNC, or any host computer.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/810,129, filed Apr. 9, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/033517 | 4/9/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/169048 | 10/16/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6801582 | Hovakimyan | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6882217 | Mueller | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7170926 | Zeira | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7447255 | De | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460580 | Pan | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7529305 | Tong | May 2009 | B1 |
7620096 | Bar-Ness | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630337 | Zheng | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7724835 | Naguib | May 2010 | B2 |
7903609 | Zheng | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8000421 | Takano | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8325844 | Walton | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8451944 | Gaur | May 2013 | B2 |
8576896 | Bar-Ness | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8693416 | Zheng | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8861637 | Na | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8976850 | Clerckx | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9106297 | To | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9124313 | Ko | Sep 2015 | B2 |
RE45807 | Agee | Nov 2015 | E |
9191080 | Yokomakura | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9319197 | Sahin | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9374141 | Murakami | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20020054621 | Kyeong | May 2002 | A1 |
20030021249 | Kim | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040095907 | Agee | May 2004 | A1 |
20040116122 | Zeira | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040141565 | Kwak | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050025267 | Reznik | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031024 | Yang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050063500 | Li | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075081 | Catreux-Erceg | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100120 | Barton | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101353 | Zeira | May 2005 | A1 |
20050157809 | Yuk | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060146725 | Li | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070015543 | Ojard | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070064632 | Zheng | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064829 | Zheng | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066237 | Zhang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066331 | Zheng | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070149117 | Hwang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070191066 | Khojastepour | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080096488 | Cho | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080112504 | Jiang | May 2008 | A1 |
20090075686 | Gomadam | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090196224 | Zhang | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090232191 | Gupta | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090264087 | Chae | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090280760 | Ohwatari | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090280855 | Ohwatari | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090280856 | Ohwatari | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090285271 | Perez De Aranda Alonso | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090285325 | Zhou | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100091675 | Sawai | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100150013 | Hara | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150036 | Zheng | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100157901 | Sanderovitz | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100208712 | Wax | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100246377 | Zhang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100272211 | Ohwatari | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110007850 | Cao | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110063989 | Yang | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110199926 | Zheng | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120249370 | Okamoto | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120269280 | Li | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130064150 | Hirata | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130343481 | Zhang | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140064354 | Nakano | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140146904 | Onodera | May 2014 | A1 |
20140177763 | Tomeba | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140204841 | Ruiz Delgado | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140293904 | Dai | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150171950 | Phan Huy | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150230266 | Sung | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150236771 | Pan | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245373 | Kim | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Andrews, Jeffrey G., “Seven Ways that HetNets are a Cellular Paradigm Shift”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Mar. 2013, pp. 136-144. |
Beck et al., “Gradient-Based Algorithms With Applications to Signal Recovery Problems”, Convex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communications, Edited by Y. Eldar and D. Palomar, Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 42-48. |
Bjornson et al., “Optimal Resource Allocation in Coordinated Multi-Cell Systems”, Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory, vol. 9, Nos. 2-3, 2013, pp. 113-381. |
Boyd et al., “Convex Optimization”, Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 1-730. |
Chandrasekhar et al., “Femtocell Networks: a Survey”, IEEE, Communications Magazine, vol. 46, No. 9, Sep. 12, 2008, pp. 59-67. |
China Mobile, “C-Ran: the Road Towards Green Ran”, White Paper, V2.5, China Mobile Research Institute, Oct. 2011, pp. 1-48. |
Coso et al., “Distributed Compression for Mimo Coordinated Networks With a Backhaul Constraint”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, No. 9, Sep. 2009, pp. 4698-4709. |
Costa, M.H.M, “Writing on Dirty Paper (Corresp.)”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 29, no. 3, May 1983, pp. 439-441. |
Erez et al., “A Close-to-Capacity Dirty Paper Coding Scheme”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 51, No. 10, Oct. 2005, pp. 3417-3432. |
Ericsson, “Heterogeneous Networks”, Ericsson White Paper, Feb. 2012. |
Flanagan, Tom, “Creating Cloud Base Stations With Ti's Keystone Multicore Architecture”, White Paper, Texas Instruments, Oct. 2011, pp. 1-9. |
Forney Jr., G. D., “Shannon Meets Wiener Ii: on Mmse Estimation in Successive Decoding Schemes”, Available at http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0409011.pdf, Sep. 26, 2004, pp. 1-9. |
Gesbert et al., “Multi-Cell Mimo Cooperative Networks: a New Look at Interference”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 28, No. 9, Dec. 2010, pp. 1380-1408. |
Grieger et al., “Large Scale Field Trial Results on Frequency Domain Compression for Uplink Joint Detection”, IEEE Globecom Workshops (Gc Wkshps), Anaheim, Ca, Dec. 3-7, 2012, pp. 1128-1133. |
Hong et al., “Decomposition by Successive Convex Approximation: a Unifying Approach for Linear Transceiver Design in Interfering Heterogeneous Networks”, Available at http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.1507v1.pdf, Oct. 4, 2012, pp. 1-41. |
Hong et al., “Joint Base Station Clustering and Beamformer Design for Partial Coordinated Transmission in Heterogeneous Networks”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 31, No. 2, Feb. 2013, pp. 226-240. |
Hong et al., “Quantized Compute and Forward: a Low-Complexity Architecture for Distributed Antenna Systems”, IEEE Information Theory Workshop (Itvv), Paraty, Brazil, Oct. 16-20, 2011, pp. 420-424. |
Hong et al., “Reverse Compute and Forward: a Low-Complexity Architecture for Downlink Distributed Antenna Systems”, IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings (Isit), Cambridge, Ma, Jul. 1-6, 2012, pp. 1147-1151. |
Huh et al., “Multiuser Miso Transmitter Optimization for Intercell Interference Mitigation”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 58, No. 8, Apr. 19, 2010, pp. 4272-4285. |
Intel, “Intel Heterogeneous Network Solution Brief”, Solution Brief, Intel Core Processor, Telecommunications Industry, 2011, pp. 1-5. |
Lee et al., “High Snr Analysis for Mimo Broadcast Channels: Dirty Paper Coding Versus Linear Precoding”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 53, No. 12, Dec. 2007, pp. 4787-4792. |
Lim et al., “Noisy Network Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 57, No. 5, May 2011, pp. 3132-3152. |
Liu et al., “A 25 Gb/s(/km ) Urban Wireless Network Beyond Imt-Advanced”, IEEE, Communications Magazine, vol. 49 , No. 2, Feb. 2011, pp. 122-129. |
Loyka et al., “On the Compound Capacity of a Class of Mimo Channels Subject to Normed Uncertainty”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 58, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 2048-2063. |
Maric et al., “Resource Allocation for Constrained Backhaul in Picocell Networks”, Information Theory and Applications Workshop (Ita), La Jolla, Ca, Feb. 6-11, 2011, pp. 1-6. |
Marsch et al., “On Downlink Network Mimo Under a Constrained Backhaul and Imperfect Channel Knowledge”, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Globecom, Honolulu, Hawaii, Nov. 30, 2009, pp. 1-6. |
Nazer et al., “Structured Superposition for Backhaul Constrained Cellular Uplink”, IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, ISIT, Seoul, Korea, Jun. 28, 2009, pp. 1530-1534. |
Ng et al., “Distributed Downlink Beamforming with Cooperative Base Stations”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory vol. 54, No. 12, Dec. 2008, pp. 5491-5499. |
Ng et al., “Linear Precoding in Cooperative Mimo Cellular Networks with Limited Coordination Clusters”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 28, No. 9, Oct. 4, 2010, pp. 1446-1454. |
Park et al., “Joint Precoding and Multivariate Backhaul Compression for the Downlink of Cloud Radio Access Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 61, No. 22, Nov. 15, 2013, pp. 5646-5658. |
Park et al., “Robust and Efficient Distributed Compression for Cloud Radio Access Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 62 , No. 2, Feb. 12, 2013, pp. 692-703. |
Sanderovich et al., “Distributed Mimo Receiver—Achievable Rates and Upper Bounds”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 55 , No. 10, Oct. 2009, pp. 4419-4438. |
Sanderovich et al., “Uplink Macro Diversity of Limited Backhaul Cellular Network”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 55 , No. 8, Aug. 2009, pp. 3457-3478. |
Scutari et al., “Decomposition by Partial Linearization: Parallel Optimization of Multi-Agent Systems”, Available at http://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.0756v1.pdf, Feb. 4, 2013, pp. 1-12. |
Segel et al., “Lightradio Portfolio-Technical Overview”, Technology White Paper 1, Alcatel-Lucent, 2011, pp. 1-16. |
Shen et al., “Distributed Robust Multicell Coordinated Beamforming with Imperfect CSI: An ADMM Approach”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 60, No. 6, Feb. 22, 2012, pp. 2988-3003. |
Simeone et al., “Cooperative Wireless Cellular Systems: An Information-Theoretic View”, Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory, vol. 8, Nos. 1-2, 2012, pp. 1-177. |
Simeone et al., “Downlink Multicell Processing with Limited-Backhaul Capacity”, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2009, pp. 1-10. |
Tse et al., “Multiaccess Fading Channels-Part I: Polymatroid Structure, Optimal Resource Allocation and Throughput Capacities”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 44, No. 7, Nov. 1998, pp. 2796-2815. |
Zakhour et al., “Optimized Data Sharing in Multicell MIMO with Finite Backhaul Capacity”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 59, No. 12, Aug. 25, 2011, pp. 6102-6111. |
Zhang et al., “On Gaussian MIMO BC-MAC Duality with Multiple Transmit Covariance Constraints”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 58, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 2064-2078. |
Zhang et al., “Successive Coding in Multiuser Information Theory”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 53, No. 6, Jun. 2007, pp. 2246-2254. |
Zhang, Rui, “Cooperative Multi-Cell Block Diagonalization with Per-Base-Station Power Constraints”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 28, No. 9, Dec. 2010, pp. 1435-1445. |
Zhou et al., “Uplink Multicell Processing with Limited Backhaul via Successive Interference Cancellation”, IEEE, Communication Theory Symposium, Globecom, Dec. 3-7, 2012, pp. 2322-2327. |
Gamal et al., “Lecture Notes Network Information Theory”, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Jun. 22, 2010, 640 pages. |
Marsch et al., “Future Mobile Communication Networks: Challenges in the Design and Operation”, IEEE, Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 7 , No. 1, Mar. 2012, pp. 16-23. |
Sohn et al., “Belief Propagation for Distributed Downlink Beamforming in Cooperative MIMO Cellular Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 10, No. 12, Dec. 2011, pp. 4140-4149. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160087820 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61810129 | Apr 2013 | US |