Patent Grant
11648019
This disclosure relates generally to devices and methods for preparing and realigning bones.
Bones, such as the bones of a foot, may be anatomically misaligned. In certain circumstances, surgical intervention is required to correctly align the bones to reduce patient discomfort and improve patient quality of life.
In general, this disclosure is directed to devices and techniques for preparing and realigning one or more bones from an anatomically misaligned position to an anatomically aligned position. In some examples, the devices and techniques are utilized to correct a bunion deformity where a first metatarsal is anatomically misaligned relative to a medial cuneiform and/or second metatarsal. To correct such a misalignment, a system may be utilized that includes a bone preparing guide and a spacer. The bone preparing guide can provide one or more cutting surfaces and/or cutting slots along or through which a cutting instrument can be translated to prepare opposed ends of the first metatarsal and/or medial cuneiform for relative realignment. The spacer can serve as an alignment and/or reference tool for the bone preparing guide.
In some examples, a clinician inserts the spacer into the joint space between the first metatarsal and medial cuneiform. The spacer can have a variety of different configurations, such as a centered insertion portion, an offset insertion portion, a constant thickness, a tapered thickness, or the like. After suitably positioning the spacer, the clinician may insert the bone preparing guide across the joint space, e.g., by installing the bone preparing guide over a portion of the spacer projecting out of the joint space. The clinician can then use the bone preparing guide to cut the end of the first metatarsal and/or the end of the medial cuneiform to facilitate realignment of the bones relative to each other. In some examples, the clinician utilizes a tissue removing instrument location check to check the position and/or orientation of one or more cutting surfaces or slots relative to the bone(s) to be cut before making such cuts. In either case, the clinician may adjust the position of the first metatarsal either before or after making the cuts to achieve realignment of the metatarsal.
In one example, a method for preparing one or more bones is described. The method includes inserting a spacer into a space defined between a first bone and a second bone. The method further involves aligning a bone preparation guide with a portion of the first bone or the second bone while the spacer is inserted into the space, using the spacer as a reference. In addition, the method includes contacting the portion of the first bone or the second bone with a tissue removing instrument using the bone preparation guide to guide the tissue removing instrument.
In another example, a bone preparation guide is described that includes a body and a spacer. The body has a first guide surface to define a first preparing plane and a second guide surface to define a second preparing plane. The first and second guide surfaces are spaced from each other by a distance. The example specifies that a first end extends from the body in a first direction and a second end extends from the body in a second direction, the second direction being different than the first direction, with each of the first end and the second end including a fixation aperture configured to receive a fixation device. The example also specifies that the spacer extends from the body in a third direction, the third direction being different than the first and second directions. The spacer is configured to be placed into a joint space between opposing bones.
In another example, a spacer configured to be inserted into a joint space between first and second opposing bones is described. The spacer includes a first portion configured to extend into the joint space and a second portion, opposite the first portion, configured to extend above the joint space. The spacer also includes an intermediate portion disposed between the first portion and the second portion. The example specifies that the spacer is configured to serve as a reference to position a tissue removing instrument with respect to the first and/or second bone.
The details of one or more examples are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
The details of one or more examples are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
The following detailed description is exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. Rather, the following description provides some practical illustrations for implementing exemplary embodiments of the present invention. Examples of constructions, materials, and dimensions are provided for selected elements, and all other elements employ that which is known to those of ordinary skill in the field of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many of the noted examples have a variety of suitable alternatives.
In general, this disclosure is directed to surgical instruments and techniques that can be used in a bone correction procedure. Embodiments of the disclosure include a spacer, bone preparing guide, and/or tissue removing instrument location check member along with methods of positioning such spacers and guides in a medical procedure. Such instruments can be used alone or in combination to improve the efficacy of a bone correction procedure as compared to when the procedure is used without the instruments.
In an exemplary application, embodiments of the spacer, bone preparing guide, and/or tissue removing instrument location check member can be used before and/or during a surgical procedure, such as a bone alignment, osteotomy, fusion procedure, and/or other procedures where one or more bones are to be prepared (e.g., cartilage or bone removal and/or cut). Such a procedure can be performed, for example, on bones (e.g., adjacent bones separated by a joint or different portions of a single bone) in the foot or hand, where bones are relatively smaller compared to bones in other parts of the human anatomy. In one example, a procedure utilizing one or more embodiments of the disclosure can be performed to correct an alignment between a metatarsal (e.g., a first metatarsal) and a second metatarsal and/or a cuneiform (e.g., a medial, or first, cuneiform), such as in a bunion correction surgery. An example of such a procedure is a Lapidus procedure (also known as a first tarsal-metatarsal fusion). In another example, the procedure can be performed by modifying an alignment of a metatarsal (e.g., a first metatarsal). An example of such a procedure is a basilar metatarsal osteotomy procedure.
For example, the described surgical instruments can be used in combination during a tarsometatarsal (“TMT”) fusion procedure to achieve a multi-planar realignment (e.g., bi-planar, tri-planar) of a first metatarsal with respect to a medial cuneiform. The spacer can be used to properly position a bone preparation guide, or cut guide, with respect to the TMT joint and, more particularly, guide surfaces or slots of the cut guide with respect to bone ends to be cut. In some examples, one or more guide surfaces or slots of the cut guide are angled. For example, the cut guide may be configured to position a guide slot through which a cutting instrument is translated parallel to the end face of a first metatarsal while another guide slot is skewed with respect to the end face of a medial cuneiform. The guide slot positioned over the end of the medial cuneiform may angle proximally from the medial to the lateral sides of the medial cuneiform, resulting in a wedge-shaped section of bone being removed from the medial cuneiform. The disclosed instruments can help appropriately prepare the ends of the first metatarsal and medial cuneiform for repositioning in multiple planes (e.g., a frontal plane, a transverse plane, and/or a sagittal plane), allowing the first metatarsal to be corrected from an anatomically misaligned position to an anatomically aligned position.
In some embodiments, as shown in
In some embodiments, an opening 30 can be defined by the body 16 between the first and second facing surfaces 22, 24. The opening 30 can thus be an area between the slots 26, 28 useful, for instance, for allowing a practitioner to have a visual path to an osteotomy site (e.g., cartilage, bones, and/or joint space) during bone preparation and/or to receive instruments, as discussed further below. In the embodiment shown, the opening 30 extends across the body 16 a distance from a surface 32 opposite of the first facing surface 22 to a surface 34 opposite of the second facing surface 24.
The embodiment shown also includes a first end 40 extending from the body 16 in a first direction and a second end 42 extending from the body 16 in a second direction. The second direction can be different than the first direction (e.g., an opposite direction). The first and second ends 40, 42 can each extend out perpendicularly from the body 16 as shown or, in other embodiments, the first and second ends 40, 42 can extend out from the body at differing angles. As shown, each of the first end 40 and the second end 42 can include at least one fixation aperture 44 configured to receive a fixation device (e.g., a pin, not shown) to secure the guide 12 to one or more bones. Such apertures 44, as shown, may extend through each respective end at a vertical or skewed angle relative to a top surface of the guide 12.
The bone preparing guide 12 can also include a first adjustable stabilization member 46 engaged with the first end 40. In some embodiments, the bone preparing guide 12 also includes a second adjustable stabilization member 48 engaged with the second end 42. Each of the members 46, 48 can be threaded and engage a threaded aperture defined by the ends 40, 42. The elevation of each end 40, 42 can be adjusted with respect to one or more bones by adjusting the member 46, 48 at the end for which an elevation adjustment is desired. In some embodiments, as shown, the members 46, 48 may be cannulated such that they can receive respective fixation devices. While bone preparing guide 12 is illustrated with two adjustable stabilization members, in other examples, the guide can include fewer adjustable stabilization members (e.g., none, one) or more adjustable stabilization members (e.g., three, four, or more) and the disclosure is not limited in this respect.
As noted, the bone preparing guide as shown in
In the embodiment shown, the spacer 14 can be selectively engaged with the bone preparing guide 12, such that the spacer and guide can be attached and detached. For instance, the spacer 14 can be received by the body 16 of the guide 12, such as by inserting the spacer into opening 30. When the spacer 14 is received in the opening 30, the spacer 14 may extend from the body in between the first guide surface 18 and the second guide surface 20, or in between the first and second slots 26, 28, when provided. In some instances where the spacer 14 is received within the opening 30, no connection between the guide 12 and spacer 14 need be present, as the opening 30 itself may be sufficient for engaging the guide and spacer. The spacer 14 can engage the guide 12 such that the guide 12 and/or spacer 14 can move relative to one another while engaged (e.g., in a vertical direction). For example, in some embodiments, the guide 12 can move relative to the spacer 14 while the guide 12 and spacer 14 are engaged, such that the guide can be inserted over the spacer or removed from the spacer while the spacer is engaged within a joint space. For example, a distal portion of the spacer can be inserted into a joint space (e.g., tarsal-metatarsal joint space) and the guide 12 positioned over the top of the spacer with a proximal portion of the spacer projecting out from the top of the guide. In yet further embodiments, the guide 12 and spacer 14 can be removably attachable, such as by magnets, a snap-fit, male-female interfacing parts, or other temporary connections.
In one application, the space between two bones into which the spacer 14 is configured to be inserted can be a TMT joint space, such as the first metatarsal-cuneiform joint as shown in
As seen in the embodiment of
As shown in
A length of the keel 62, and first portion 60, can be configured to allow the keel 62 to extend vertically to a bottom base of the space between two bones (e.g., where the spacer 14 is used in an application on the foot as seen in
The keel 62, and the first portion 60, can be made of various materials appropriate for one or more desired applications of the spacer. In one example, the keel can made of a rigid material, such as metal or plastic, which does not deform or otherwise change geometry when inserted into the space between two bones. By preventing the keel from deforming when inserted into the space between two bones, the spacer can be maintained in general alignment with the interfacing bone surfaces at the space. In other examples, the keel can be made of a flexible material in order to generally maintain alignment of the spacer with the interfacing bones surfaces at the space while providing the keel with some give in its geometry to conform to one or more non-parallel portions of interfacing bones at the space. In other embodiments, the keel includes a combination of a rigid material and a flexible material. For example, a perimeter of the keel may include the flexible material to facilitate insertion into the joint space and a central portion can include a rigid material to prevent deformation.
The spacer 14 can further include a second portion 64 at or near an end of the spacer 14 opposite the keel 62. The second portion 64 can be designed to be gripped, such as by a hand of a surgeon during a procedure. The second portion 64 can have, in some instances, one or more recesses 66 (two recesses 66 are shown in
In some embodiments, the spacer 14 can have an intermediate portion 68 disposed between the first and second portions 60, 64. The first, second, and intermediate portions can be provided as an integral member or can be provided as separately joined components. In either case, each portion can comprise a material different from the other portions, and the material can have different characteristics, such as rigidity and flexibility, than the materials of the other portions. Alternatively, all the portions of spacer 14 may be fabricated from the same material, such as a unitary body formed of metal or plastic.
In embodiments where the spacer is provided as a separate component from the bone preparation guide and configured to be engaged with the bone preparation guide, the intermediate portion 68 can be engageable with the body of the guide (e.g., at the opening defined by the body of the guide). In the example shown, the intermediate portion 68 can have a first region 70 and a second region 72. The first region 70 can have an extended thickness relative to the thickness of the first portion 60 (and thus the keel 62) and can transition from interfacing with the guide to the second portion 64 along its length. The second region 72 can have an extended width relative to the width of the first portion 60 (and thus keel 62). The extended thickness of the first region and/or the extended width of the second region 72 can allow the spacer 14 to be more stably received by the body of the guide in examples where the spacer 14 and guide are separate components.
In embodiments where the spacer 14 is configured to be used as a stand-alone device without a bone guide, the intermediate portion 68 can be used to provide a first guide surface and an opposite second guide surface. In such embodiments, the first portion 60 (and thus the keel 62) of the spacer can be inserted into a joint space, and a surface of the intermediate portion 68 can be used to provide a guide surface. For example, the surface of the first region 70 on a first side of the spacer 14 can be configured as a first guide surface, and the surface of the first region 70 on an opposite side of the spacer 14 can be configured as a second guide surface. In some embodiments, at least the first region 70 of the intermediate portion 68 has a thickness greater than the thickness of the first portion 60. The difference in thickness of the first region 70 and the first portion 60 on each side of the spacer 14 can define a length and thickness of tissue to be removed by a tissue removing instrument guided by the surface of the intermediate portion.
In use, the first portion 60 may be inserted into a joint space and a tissue removal instrument placed against the intermediate portion 68 to guide a preparation of a first bone on a first side of the spacer 14. A tissue removal instrument can be placed against the intermediate portion 68 to guide a second preparation to a second bone on a second, opposite side of the spacer 14. In a specific example, the tissue removing instrument can be guided by the spacer 14 for about one-half of a thickness of the tissue to be removed. Then the spacer can be removed from the joint space and the tissue removing instrument could be reinserted to finish the tissue removal.
Independent of how spacer 14 is inserted into the joint between bones 50, 52 relative to installation of guide 12 over the bones, the spacer 14 can serve to provide initial stability to the guide 12 (e.g., prior to the guide 12 receiving fixation devices). For example, the spacer 14 can engage with the guide 12 and, once seated in the space between the bones, act to support the guide 12. Moreover, where the guide 12 and spacer 14 are separate components insertable into each other, the depth that the spacer 14 is inserted within the space between bones can be adjusted without needing to remove the guide 12. Similarly, the distance between where the guide 12 is positioned vertically in relation to the space between bones can be adjusted while leaving the spacer 14 in place.
In operation, spacer 14 can serve as an alignment and/or reference tool for the guide 12 with respect to the one or more bone surfaces to be prepared (e.g., cut, morselized). Such surfaces to be prepared can include all or a portion of an interfacing surface of bone 50 or 52 as shown. When the spacer 14 is inserted into the space (e.g., a joint) between the bones 50, 52, the spacer 14 can act to align the guide 12 at an appropriate position (e.g., longitudinal along the bones 50, 52) and orientation (e.g., angle relative to the bones 50, 52 in multiple planes selected from more than one of a frontal plane, a transverse plane, and a sagittal plane) for the intended procedure relative to the surfaces of the bones 50, 52 to be prepared.
For example, when the spacer 14 is inserted into the space between bones 50, 52, the spacer can help align and orient, in one or more planes, the first guide surface 18 and the second guide surface 20 (and/or slots 26, 28, when provided) of the guide 12 relative to respective surfaces of the bones 50, 52 to be prepared. When inserted into the space between bones 50, 52, the spacer 14 can engage the guide 12 (e.g., physically restrict the free range of movement of guide 12), longitudinally aligning the guide 12 with the surface of each of bones 50 and 52 to be prepared. For example, spacer 14 can longitudinally align the first guide surface 18 with the end surface of the bone 52 and the second guide surface 20 with the end surface of the bone 50. Additionally, when inserted into the space between bones, the spacer 14 can extend out from the space and provide an indication as to the location of the interfacing, end surfaces of each of bones 50 and 52. In this way, orienting the guide 12 relative to the spacer 14 serves as an angular reference relative to the end surfaces of each of bones 50 and 52. Thus, the spacer 14 can facilitate accurate preparation of a desired surface of one or more bones 50, 52.
In some applications, it can be desirable to prepare interfacing surfaces of one or both bones 50, 52 by cutting a slice from one or both surfaces, where the slice has a generally constant thickness. In such an application, the spacer 14 can be configured to orient a first guide surface 18 parallel to the preparation surface of bone 52 and/or a second guide surface 20 parallel to the preparation surface of bone 50. In the case of a metatarsal-cuneiform joint as shown in
In other additional or alternative applications, it can be desirable to prepare interfacing surfaces of one or both bones 50, 52 by cutting a wedge-shaped portion from the interfacing surfaces of one or both bones 50, 52, where the wedge-shaped portion does not have a uniform thickness (e.g., in the medial to lateral direction of cut). For instance, in one application, a plantar-based wedge may be cut from a medial cuneiform (e.g., bone 52), e.g., to correct a misaligned first metatarsal (e.g., bone 50). To cut a wedge-shaped portion from the interfacing end surface of one or both bones 50, 52, the first guide surface 18 and the second guide surface 20, or slots 26 and 28, when provided, can be oriented at a skewed angle relative to respective bones 52 and/or 50 using the spacer 14 as a reference for the skewed angle at which the one or more bones 50, 52 are to be cut. For example, first guide surface 18 and/or second guide surface 20 may skew proximally back along the length of the medial cuneiform as the guide surface extends from the medial side of the medial cuneiform to the lateral side of the medial cuneiform. As a result, the bone portion cut using a guide surface so configured can remove more bone from the lateral side of the medial cuneiform than the medial side of the medial cuneiform, resulting in a wedge-shaped portion of bone being removed from the medial cuneiform.
In addition to serving as a reference for positioning and orientation in bone preparation, the spacer 14 can also serve as a reference for indicating a thickness of tissue (e.g., such as bone) to be removed from a surface of a bone 50 and/or 52. For instance, a distance between a first longitudinal surface of spacer 14 and the first guide surface 18 may define a thickness of tissue to be cut from the surface of the bone 52. Similarly, a distance between a second longitudinal surface (e.g., opposite the first longitudinal surface) of the spacer 14 and the second guide surface 20 may define a thickness of tissue to be cut from the surface of the bone 50. Thus, a clinician can utilize the spacer 14 as a reference prior to preparing one or more bones in order to visualize whether the proposed bone preparation matches the desired bone preparation, such as whether the thickness of the cut to be made is in accordance with a desired thickness of tissue to be removed, and make any adjustments prior to implementation of the bone preparation action.
In some embodiments, a guide can be designated with an identification number representing a cut thickness facilitated by that particular guide, which is defined by the distance between an adjacent surface of the spacer 14 and the respective guide surface of the guide. In certain embodiments, the distance between a first guide surface 18 and the spacer 14 can be different from the distance between a second guide surface 20 and the spacer 14, such that different thickness cuts can be made on different, interfacing bones. In some examples, the distance between one or more guide surfaces on the guide and the spacer 14 can be adjustable, allowing a user to vary the thickness of matter removed by a cut.
In applications where cut guide 12 includes a guide surface (e.g., first guide surface 18 and/or second guide surface 20) that skews proximally from the medial to the lateral side of the foot to which the cut guide is applied, the angle of skew may be fixed or may be variable. For example, cut guide 12 may have an adjustable guide surface (e.g., first guide surface 18 and/or second guide surface 20) where the angle of skew can be adjusted. In practice, a clinician can set the angle of the guide surface(s) relative to the bone, e.g., to remove more on the lateral side than the medial side, more on the medial side than the lateral side, or the same amount on both the lateral and medial sides, depending on the angle set. In some configurations, the adjustable angle can be temporarily fixed, or locked, to prevent inadvertent movement after setting the desired angle. Depending on the design, the guide surface (e.g., first guide surface 18 and/or second guide surface 20) may be adjustable to provide an angle (e.g., between the guide surface and first and/or second facing surfaces 22, 24) ranging from 0 degrees to 25 degrees, such as 0 degrees to 10 degrees. For example, the guide surface may be adjustable from 25 degrees to a non-zero degree angle less than 25 degrees.
Although the spacer 14 is illustrated to be engageable with the guide 12, the spacer 14 can also be configured to engage with other guides. For example, spacer 14 may be used as part of a kit that includes a plurality of guides with different sized cut widths. A clinician can select one of the plurality of different sized guides and use the selected guide in combination with the spacer to perform a procedure. For example, a clinician may select one guide 12 to engage with spacer 14 and provide a designated first cut thickness. If the clinician, using the spacer 14 as a reference, determines that the cut thickness that would result using the first guide is not desirable for the particular operation, the spacer 14 can be removed from the first guide and engaged with a second guide having a designated second cut thickness different from the first cut thickness of the first guide.
While spacer 14 illustrated and described above with respect to
As one example, the width of the spacer 14 can be sized such that the spacer extends into a lateral region of adjacent bone ends, when the spacer is positioned between the bones. For example, the width of the portion of spacer 14 configured to be positioned between adjacent portions of bone (e.g., first portion 60) can be wide enough (in the medial to lateral direction) that the spacer extends at least into the lateral half of the end faces of the adjacent bones between which the spacer is positioned.
For example, when spacer 14 is configured to be inserted into a tarsal-metatarsal joint space (e.g., between first metatarsal 50 and medial cuneiform 52), first portion 60 of the spacer may be project laterally a distance sufficient to position the first portion of the spacer between the lateral half of the end faces of first metatarsal 50 and medial cuneiform 52. The first portion 60 may contact the ends of first metatarsal 50 and medial cuneiform 52 on the lateral side of the bone ends (e.g., lateral-most half, lateral-most third, lateral-most edges). In some configurations, the first portion 60 of spacer 14 extends laterally a distance sufficient to contact a medial side of an adjacent bone (e.g., second metatarsal), when positioned between first metatarsal 50 and medial cuneiform 52.
In configurations where spacer 14 is symmetric, the first portion 60 of the spacer may also project medially to contact the ends of first metatarsal 50 and medial cuneiform 52 on the medial side of the bone ends (e.g., medial-most half, medial-most third, medial-most edges). Alternatively, as discussed in more detail below, first portion 60 may be laterally offset in the medial-lateral dimension. In either case, second portion 64 may be symmetric with respect to the first portion and have the same width as the first portion or may be asymmetric with respect to the first portion and/or have a different width than the first portion.
Configuring spacer 14 to have a portion positionable within a lateral portion of a joint space can be useful to help prevent misalignment of guide 12. In practice, when bone 50 is realigned relative to bone 52 and/or an adjacent bone (e.g., second metatarsal), a gap between bone 50 and bone 52 may open on the medial side of the joint space between the ends of the bones. This gap may occur, e.g., as an intermetatarsal angle between a first metatarsal and second metatarsal is closed by pivoting and/or rotating the first metatarsal toward the second metatarsal. In some situations, as a gap on the medial side of the joint space opens, a spacer positioned inside of the joint space can shift (e.g., laterally or medially) and/or rotate (e.g., such that the portion of the spacer above the joint space does not project dorsally but instead projects in a lateral-dorsal or medial-dorsal direction). When the guide 12 is subsequently positioned over the shifted and/or rotated spacer 14, the cutting surface(s) of the guide may be misaligned with respect to when the ends of bones 50 and 52 are desirably cut.
By configuring the spacer 14 so that at least a portion of the spacer positioned between the ends of bones 50 and 52 (e.g., within the tarsal-metatarsal joint space) is on the lateral side of the joint space, the spacer may remain properly positioned through realignment of bone 50. For example, as the intermetatarsal angle between a first metatarsal and second metatarsal is closed by pivoting and/or rotating the first metatarsal toward the second metatarsal, the lateral side of the ends of bones 50 and 52 may move toward each other while the medial side of the ends of the bones may move away from each other. This can pinch the lateral portion of spacer 14 between the ends of the bones (e.g., by having the lateral sides of the ends of the bones press against opposing sides of the spacer). As a result, the spacer 14 may be retained in a stable position in the joint space between the bones such that, when guide 12 is subsequently positioned over spacer 14, the guide is appropriately positioned to cut the ends of bones 50 and 52 (e.g., by translating a cutting instrument along and/or through guide surfaces of the guide to resects the bone ends).
Spacer 14 can have a variety of different configurations that allow at least a portion of the spacer to be positioned on lateral sides of the end faces of the bones between which the spacer is inserted. As another example, the portion of spacer 14 that is configured to project plantarly of bone preparation guide 12 (e.g., the portion positioned in the joint space between opposed ends of bones 50 and 52 while guide 12 is positioned on top of the bones) may be asymmetrical with respect to portion of the spacer located inside of guide 12 and/or projecting out of the top of the guide (e.g., dorsally of the guide). For example, instead of configuring first portion 60 of spacer 14 to be positioned substantially centered in the joint between the ends of bones 50 and 52, the first portion 60 of the spacer may be offset relative to an axis extending through a geometric center of the ends of the bones and the joint therebetween. When so configured, the spacer 14 may be inserted into one side of the joint space between the bones 50 and 52 while leaving another side of the joint space devoid of any spacer substrate.
As one example in accordance with this configuration, spacer 14 may be configured so that first portion 60 is offset relative to an axis extending through a geometric center of second portion 64. For example, when second portion is configured to have guide 12 insertable into and removable over the top of the second portion 64, first portion 60 may project downwardly from one side of the second portion. In use, such a configuration can cause first portion 60 to project asymmetrically with respect to the cross-sectional plane (e.g., medial-lateral plane at a single elevation) relative to second portion 64 and/or guide 12 positioned over the guide.
For example, when spacer 14 is configured to be inserted into a tarsal-metatarsal joint space (e.g., between a first metatarsal and medial cuneiform), first portion 60 of the spacer may be laterally offset relative to second portion 64. That is, first portion 60 may be positioned preferentially toward the lateral side of the joint as opposed to the medial side of the joint. The laterally-offset first portion 60 of spacer 14 may contact the ends of bones 50 and 52 on the lateral side of the bone ends (e.g., lateral-most half, lateral-most third, lateral-most edges) but not on the medial side of the bone ends (e.g., medial-most half, medial-most third, medial-most edges). The second portion 64 of the spacer may be substantially centered between the lateral and medial edges of bones 50 and 52. Accordingly, the portion of spacer 14 that is visible by the clinician and/or used to orient guide 12 (e.g., by positioning the guide over the spacer) can be substantially centered in the medial-lateral direction over the ends of the bones 50 and 52. However, the portion of spacer 14 that actually projects below the dorsal face of bones 50 and 52 in the plantar direction can be offset to the lateral side in the medial-lateral direction.
As shown in the example of
The spacer 400 illustrated in
The spacer 400 can also have, in some embodiments, an intermediate portion 68 disposed between the first and second portions 62, 64. In embodiments where the spacer 400 is provided as a separate component from the bone preparation guide and configured to be engaged with the bone preparation guide, the intermediate portion 68 can be engageable with the body of the guide (e.g., at the opening defined by the body of the guide). In the example shown, the intermediate portion 68 has a first region 70 and a second region 72. The first region 70 can have an extended thickness relative to the thickness of the first portion 60 (and thus the keel 62) and can transition from interfacing with the guide to the second portion 64 along its length. The second region 72 can have an extended width relative to the width of the first portion 60 (and thus keel 62). In the example shown, the intermediate portion 68, including the first and second regions 70, 72, has a central longitudinal axis that coincides (e.g., is coaxial) with the central longitudinal axis 408 of the second portion 64.
As shown in
The spacer 400 can be inserted into the space between two bones 50 and 52, such as shown in
The offset configuration of the spacer 400 can be useful in providing a stable spacer within the joint space, for instance, during a procedure where a bone alignment is to be altered. For example, in one type of bone alignment procedure the bone 50 may need to be realigned (e.g., using positioner device 410) in a manner that reduces an angle between the bone 50 and the bone 53. While the bone 50 is realigned, a gap at the medial side of the joint between the bone 50 and bone 52 may increase. This may cause a spacer positioned within the joint to become unstable (e.g., because the spacer is no longer tightly engaged between the bones 50 and 52 due to the increased gap at the medial side of the joint).
Using the spacer 400 having the offset configuration within the joint during bone realignment can help stably maintain the spacer 400 within the joint. For example, because the spacer 400 can have the first portion 60 positioned in the joint closer to the lateral side than the medial side (e.g., at the lateral region of the joint such that the first sidewall 404 contacts the medial side of the second metatarsal 53) the spacer can be generally maintained at a constant position within the joint during this realignment. This can result because the spacing between the bones 50 and 52 at the lateral side of the joint during realignment may stay substantially constant or be reduced relative to the spacing before the realignment. As a result, the first portion 60 positioned at the lateral region can be stably held within the joint even after this realignment is completed. Furthermore, because the first portion 60 is stably maintained within the joint, the second portion 64, and central longitudinal axis 408 thereof, may also be generally maintained at its original position, such as at the center of the joint. This spacer 400 configuration, which may provide increased stability, can in turn be useful when the spacer 400 is utilized to facilitate preparation (e.g., cutting) of one or more bone surfaces, as will be described below with reference to
Independent of whether a spacer is configured with a first portion aligned with a second portion (e.g., as discussed with respect to spacer 14) or a first portion offset relative to a second portion (e.g., as discussed with respect to spacer 400), the spacer can have a variety of different cross-sectional configurations. For example, while spacer 14 in
When configured with a differential thickness across its width, spacer 14 (
In use, a spacer with tapered thickness may be positioned in a TMT joint with the thicker side of the spacer located medially and the thinner side of the spacer located laterally across the joint. During realignment of the first metatarsal relative to the medial cuneiform, a larger gap may open on the medial side between the end face of the first metatarsal and the end face of the medial cuneiform than on the lateral side. Accordingly, positioning the thicker portion of the spacer medially and the thinner portion of the spacer laterally across the TMT joint can help fill a gap between the bones, e.g., helping the spacer to fit snuggly within the TMT joint space and prevent inadvertent movement of the spacer.
Spacer 14/400 can have any suitable cross-section shape. For example, while spacer 14/400 is illustrated as defining a substantially rectangular shape, in other examples the spacer can define other shapes. Spacer 14/400 can define any polygonal (e.g., square, hexagonal) or arcuate (e.g., circular, elliptical) shape, or even combinations of polygonal and arcuate shapes. Indeed, first portion 60 of spacer 14/400 need not be a continuous structure across its width W but can be formed of discontinuous segments or portions of material which, in combination, achieve spacer functions.
When configured with pins 403A and 403B, the ends or tips of the pins may be rounded and/or tapered (e.g., to a point) to provide for easier insertion of the pins into the space between two bones.
While bone preparing guide 450 can have a variety of different configurations, as described above with respect to bone preparing guide 12, in the configuration illustrated in
Where the guide 450 is used to prepare one or more bones during a procedure on the foot as shown in the exemplary illustration of
In some examples, guide 450 is configured to be flipped in the frontal plane 180 degrees for interchangeable use on either the right or left foot of a patient. For example, if a TMT fusion procedure is being performed on the left foot of the patient, guide 450 may be rotated in a first orientation so slot 26 is angled proximal from the medial to lateral direction of the left foot. By contrast, if the TMT fusion procedure is being performed on the right foot of the patient, guide 450 may be rotated 180 degrees to a second orientation so slot 26 is angled proximal from the medial to lateral direction of the right foot. The top and bottom surfaces of guide 450 may be devoid of projections or other structural features that prevent the guide from being flipped and placed over a joint to be cut in order to configure the guide with skewed cutting slot for deployment on either foot.
In some examples, guide 450 with skewed slot 26 is provided as part of a kit that includes a plurality of different guides. The guides can vary by having different sizes and/or angles at which slot 26 is skewed relative to each other. During a procedure, a clinician can select one of the plurality of different guides, e.g., that best matches the size and/or angle of the cut desired to be made. To facilitate interchangeability of the guides during the procedure, each of the plurality of guides can have anchoring apertures (e.g., first and second adjustable stabilization members 46, 48) that are at the same location relative to each other (e.g., same separation distance and angle). When so configured, a clinician may remove one guide from anchoring pins set into first metatarsal 50 and medial cuneiform 52 (e.g., by pulling the guide up off the pins) and insert a different guide, for example having a slot 26 skewed at a different angle than the removed guide, over the same pins (e.g., by pushing the second guide down over the pins).
To help select an appropriate one of the plurality of available guides each having a cutting surface skewed at a different angle, a clinician may take an X-ray of a TMT joint being operated upon before selecting the guide. The clinician may take the X-ray from the dorsal to plantar direction to select and size the cut angle to be made on the medial cuneiform. The clinician may then select a particular one of the plurality of available guides whose angle best matches the size and/or angle of the cut to be made for subsequently deployment over the TMT joint, and particularly over the end of the medial cuneiform to be cut, during the procedure.
In the example of
The tissue removing instrument location check member 80 can include a first portion 82 and a second portion 84. In some embodiments, such as that shown, the member 80 may further include an opening 86 defined between the first portion 82 and the second portion 84. The member 80 can be engageable with the guide 12, such as at a slot 26 or 28 or opening 30, via the first portion 82 of the member 80. As shown, the first portion 82 is engaged with the guide 12 at the slot 28 and in some cases can extend down through the slot 28. In other examples, the first portion 82 can engage the guide 12 at the slot 26 or at the opening 30. Depending on the configuration of the tissue removing instrument location check member 80, the first portion 82 may in some instances engage the guide 12 at more than one of the slot 26, slot 28, and opening 30.
The second portion 84 is connected to or integral with the first portion 82 and extends and is spaced from the first portion 82. As illustrated, the second portion 84 can be configured to extend out from the guide 12 while the first portion 82 is engaged with the guide 12. For example, the first portion 82 can be within the slot 28 of the guide 12 while the second portion 84 is spaced from the first portion 82 in a direction (e.g., radial) outside of the slot 28. The second portion 84 can have a width less than a width of the first portion 82, and additionally may include curvature along its length. As shown, the second portion 84 includes curvature along its length in a direction toward the guide 12 when the first portion 82 is engaged with the guide 12. In embodiments where the opening 86 is included in the member 80, the opening 86 may be configured to receive a portion of a bone such that the second portion 84 can extend outwardly around such bone portion received in the opening 86.
The first portion 82 and the second portion 84 can be designed to be complimentary portions. In particular, in some examples, the position of the second portion 84 can in some predetermined manner correspond to the position of the first portion 82. For instance, where the member 80 is properly engaged with the guide 12, a tip of the second portion 84 can extend a same depth as a bottom edge of the first portion 82 (e.g., the tip of the second portion 84 and a bottom edge of the first portion 82 extend along a same plane). In such instance, visually inspecting a depth of the second portion 84 (e.g., extended outside of the guide 12) can provide an indication as to a depth of the first portion 82. This can be beneficial in applications where the bottom edge of the first portion 82 is inserted into tissue and not easily seen by a surgeon, but where the second portion 84 extends out from the tissue and can be seen by the surgeon. As such, in some examples the second portion 84 can allow a surgeon to ascertain how deep the first portion 82 is within the tissue by simply looking at the second portion 84 that is outside the tissue. In some cases, the depth of the second portion 84 can directly correspond to the depth of the first portion 82, and in other cases the correspondence between the first and second portions can be a predetermined ratio.
The tissue removing instrument location check member 80 can engage with the guide 12 in a manner that allows the member 80 to rotate relative to the guide 12 while engaged with the guide 12. This can be seen by comparing the position of the member 80 in
The member 80 can be engaged with the guide 12 when the guide 12 is placed onto a foot (as shown in
In some cases, in addition to or as an alternative to visualization using the member 80 (e.g. visualization of a position of complimentary second portion 84), imaging techniques (e.g., X-ray) can be used in conjunction with the member 80. For example, in one embodiment the member 80 can be engaged with the guide 12 such that the first portion 82 extends into tissue and contacts a bone end at a same depth and location at which a cutting instrument would contact this bone end when using the guide 12 in conjunction with the cutting instrument. The foot can then be imaged using an appropriate imaging technique while the first portion of the member 80 is within the tissue. Resulting images from the imaging technique can show the first portion of the member 80 relative to the bone end desired to be prepared in the specific application, and provide an indication as to a proposed cut depth and/or trajectory. In turn, this can allow a surgeon to adjust a position and/or orientation of the guide 12 as needed before performing the desired preparation action on this bone end.
The member 80 can be any component that projects from the guide (e.g., guide slot of a guide) in a manner that allows visualization of bone preparation position, trajectory, and/or thickness. In some cases, the spacer 14 and member 80 can both be used in a procedure to visualize proposed bone preparation and facilitate any adjustments to such bone preparation. As shown, the member 80 can be a separate component. As noted, the member 80 can engage with the guide 12, and in some examples can additionally or alternatively engage with the spacer 14. However, in other embodiments the member 80 can be integral with the spacer 14 and/or guide 12.
In some embodiments, the instrument location check member 80 is capable of showing where the tissue removing instrument will intersect both the first and second bones. Such an embodiment includes an instrument location check member with a first check member and a second check member (either or both of which can include some or all of the features described above with respect to a single member 80) connected together, such as with a bridge member. The first check member can be received within the guide slot 26 and the second check member can be received with the guide slot 28 at the same time.
Embodiments of the present invention also include methods, such as methods for fixing an orientation of a bone or bones. In general, one method of positioning a bone includes the steps of moving a bone from an anatomically misaligned position to an anatomically aligned position with respect to another bone and, after moving the bone into the aligned position, preparing an end of the moved bone and a facing end of another bone.
In some embodiments, a method includes the step of preparing a joint for a corrective procedure. For example, after creating surgical access to the joint and before moving the bones into an aligned position, soft tissue can be released to allow a bone, such as a metatarsal, to rotate freely. In some embodiments, obstructing bone may be excised (e.g., a flare of the metatarsal base, or osteophyte) to further promote free rotation.
In some embodiments, the location of the intersection of the tissue removing instrument and the bone to be prepared is confirmed before bone preparation. In one embodiment, a tissue removing instrument location check member can be engaged with the preparation guide to visually confirm where a tissue removal instrument will contact the bone. In another embodiment, a tissue spacer is engaged with the preparation guide to provide a reference for a position and/or orientation of a cut made through one or more defined by the guide. In either embodiment, such visual confirmation can include the use of an imaging device, such as an X-ray. If the position of the preparation guide is correct, additional fixation devices (e.g., pins) may be inserted through the apertures (e.g., angled apertures) to further fix the position of the preparation guide with respect to the first metatarsal and the medial cuneiform, or other bones depending on the application. In embodiments where the spacer and guide are provided as separate components, the spacer can be reattached prior to further bone preparation steps.
After proper alignment of the bones and the preparation guide, the end of a first metatarsal facing the medial cuneiform, for instance, can be prepared with a tissue removing instrument aligned with the first guide surface, such as by inserting the tissue removing instrument through a slot defined by the first guide surface and a first facing surface. And the end of the medial cuneiform facing the first metatarsal can be prepared with the tissue removing instrument aligned with a second guide surface, such as by inserting the tissue removing instrument through a slot defined by the second guide surface and a second facing surface. In embodiments that include cutting bone or cartilage, the cuneiform cut and the metatarsal cut can be parallel, conforming cuts. After the bones are prepared the guide and any other bone preparation members can be removed and the tissue (e.g., bone or cartilage slices) can be removed from the joint site.
As noted, embodiments of methods in accordance with the invention can also include steps performed after preparing the ends of the bones. For example, the ends of the bones may be placed in apposition and optionally compressed together and the position of the bones can be fixed with one or more bone fixation devices (e.g., compressing bone screw, bone plate, bone staple, external fixator, intramedullary implant or nail) prior to a closing of the surgical access to the joint.
For instance, in view of the details provided herein, one method can include inserting a spacer into a joint (e.g., TMT joint space) and then engaging the guide with the inserted spacer (in embodiments where the guide and the spacer are provided as separate components). Alternatively, the spacer can be inserted into the joint while the guide is placed onto the foot (in embodiments where the guide and the spacer are provided as separate components). In another embodiment, the guide and the spacer can be positioned together. Then, the spacer can be used as a reference for positioning and/or orienting the guide at an appropriate location relative to one or more bones for an intended application. In some examples, a tissue removing instrument location check member can additionally or alternatively be used to provide an indication as to a depth and/or trajectory of a cut to be made through a slot defined by the guide on the foot. In some cases, the location of the guide relative to the one or more bones to be prepared may be adjusted according to references obtained from the spacer and/or tissue removing instrument location check member. After the guide is appropriately located, the guide can be fixed to the foot, such as through fixation devices (e.g., pins) inserted through apertures defined in the guide. After fixing the guide to the foot, the spacer and/or tissue removing instrument location check member may be removed. In some examples, the spacer and/or tissue removing instrument location check member can remain engaged with the guide after the guide is fixed to the foot so long as no interference with the tissue removing instrument will result. A tissue removing instrument can then be inserted through the guide (e.g., through a slot defined in the guide) to prepare one or more bones at the location of the fixed guide. Any cut portions of bone resulting from use of the tissue removing instrument can be removed from the joint. The prepared bones can have their respective ends apposed together and fixation (e.g., one or more bone plates) can be applied for fusion of the prepared bone ends.
Embodiments of the invention also include a disposable, sterile kit that includes an embodiment of a bone positioning guide, bone preparation guide, spacer, and/or tissue removing instrument location check member described herein. Other components that may be included within the sterile kit include bone fixation devices, such as bone plates and/or pins, and tissue removing instruments.
Thus, embodiments of the invention are disclosed. Although the present invention has been described with reference to certain disclosed embodiments, the disclosed embodiments are presented for purposes of illustration, and not limitation, and other embodiments of the invention are possible. One skilled in the art will appreciate that various changes, adaptations, and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/267,531, filed Sep. 16, 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/366,219, filed Jul. 25, 2016, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/220,530, filed Sep. 18, 2015. The entire contents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3664022 | Small | May 1972 | A |
| 4069824 | Weinstock | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4159716 | Borchers | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4187840 | Watanabe | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4335715 | Kirkley | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4338927 | Volkov et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4349018 | Chambers | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4409973 | Neufeld | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4440168 | Warren | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4501268 | Comparetto | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4502474 | Comparetto | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4509511 | Neufeld | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4565191 | Slocum | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4570624 | Wu | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4627425 | Reese | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4628919 | Clyburn | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4632102 | Comparetto | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4664102 | Comparetto | May 1987 | A |
| 4708133 | Comparetto | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4736737 | Fargie et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4750481 | Reese | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4754746 | Cox | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4757810 | Reese | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4895141 | Koeneman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4952214 | Comparetto | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4959066 | Dunn et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4978347 | Ilizarov | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4988349 | Pennig | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4995875 | Coes | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5021056 | Hofmann et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5035698 | Comparetto | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5042983 | Rayhack | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5049149 | Schmidt | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5053039 | Hofmann et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5078719 | Schreiber | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5112334 | Alchermes et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5147364 | Comparetto | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5176685 | Rayhack | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5207676 | Canadell et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5246444 | Schreiber | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5254119 | Schreiber | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5312412 | Whipple | May 1994 | A |
| 5358504 | Paley et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5364402 | Mumme et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5374271 | Hwang | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5413579 | Du Toit | May 1995 | A |
| 5417694 | Marik et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5449360 | Schreiber | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5470335 | Du Toit | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5490854 | Fisher et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5529075 | Clark | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5540695 | Levy | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5578038 | Slocum | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5586564 | Barrett et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5601565 | Huebner | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5613969 | Jenkins, Jr. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5620442 | Bailey et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5620448 | Puddu | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5643270 | Combs | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5667510 | Combs | Sep 1997 | A |
| H1706 | Mason | Jan 1998 | H |
| 5722978 | Jenkins | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5749875 | Puddu | May 1998 | A |
| 5779709 | Harris et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5788695 | Richardson | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5803924 | Oni et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5810822 | Mortier | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5843085 | Graser | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5893553 | Pinkous | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5911724 | Wehrli | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5935128 | Carter et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941877 | Viegas et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5951556 | Faccioli et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5980526 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984931 | Greenfield | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6007535 | Rayhack et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6027504 | McGuire | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030391 | Brainard et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6162223 | Orsak et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6171309 | Huebner | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6203545 | Stoffella | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6248109 | Stoffella | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6391031 | Toomey | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6478799 | Williamson | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6511481 | von Hoffmann et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6547793 | McGuire | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6676662 | Bagga et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6719773 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6743233 | Baldwin et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6755838 | Trnka | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6796986 | Duffner | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6859661 | Tuke | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 7018383 | McGuire | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7033361 | Collazo | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7097647 | Segler et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7112204 | Justin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7153310 | Ralph et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7182766 | Mogul | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7241298 | Nemec et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7282054 | Steffensmeier et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7377924 | Raistrick et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7465303 | Riccione et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7540874 | Trumble et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7572258 | Stiernborg | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7641660 | Lakin et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| D610257 | Horton | Feb 2010 | S |
| 7686811 | Byrd et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7691108 | Lavallee | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7763026 | Egger et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| D629900 | Fisher | Dec 2010 | S |
| 7967823 | Ammann et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7972338 | O'Brien | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| D646389 | Claypool et al. | Oct 2011 | S |
| 8057478 | Kuczynski et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8062301 | Ammann et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| D651315 | Bertoni et al. | Dec 2011 | S |
| D651316 | May et al. | Dec 2011 | S |
| 8080010 | Schulz et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8080045 | Wotton, III | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8083746 | Novak | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8123753 | Poncet | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8137406 | Novak et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8147530 | Strnad et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8167918 | Strnad et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8172848 | Tomko et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8192441 | Collazo | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8197487 | Poncet et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8231623 | Jordan | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8231663 | Kay et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8236000 | Ammann et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8246561 | Agee et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| D666721 | Wright et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
| 8262664 | Justin et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8277459 | Sand et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8282644 | Edwards | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8282645 | Lawrence et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8292966 | Morton | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8303596 | Plassky et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8313492 | Wong et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8323289 | Re | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8337503 | Lian | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8343159 | Bennett | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8377105 | Buescher | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| D679395 | Wright et al. | Apr 2013 | S |
| 8409209 | Ammann et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8435246 | Fisher et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8475462 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8496662 | Novak et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8523870 | Green, II et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8529571 | Horan et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8540777 | Ammann et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8545508 | Collazo | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| D694884 | Mooradian et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
| D695402 | Dacosta et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
| 8652142 | Geissler | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8657820 | Kubiak et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| D701303 | Cook | Mar 2014 | S |
| 8672945 | Lavallee et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8696716 | Kartalian et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8702715 | Ammann et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| D705929 | Frey | May 2014 | S |
| 8715363 | Ratron et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8728084 | Berelsman et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8758354 | Habegger et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8764760 | Metzger et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8764763 | Wong et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8771279 | Philippon et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8777948 | Bernsteiner | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8784427 | Fallin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8784457 | Graham | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8795286 | Sand et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8801727 | Chan et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8808303 | Stemniski et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8828012 | May et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8858602 | Weiner et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8882778 | Ranft | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8882816 | Kartalian et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8888785 | Ammann et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| D720456 | Dacosta et al. | Dec 2014 | S |
| 8900247 | Tseng et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8906026 | Ammann et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8945132 | Plassky et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8998903 | Price et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 8998904 | Zeetser et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9023052 | Lietz et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9044250 | Olsen et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9060822 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9089376 | Medoff et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9101421 | Blacklidge | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9107715 | Blitz et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9113920 | Ammann et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| D740424 | Dacosta et al. | Oct 2015 | S |
| D765844 | DaCosta | Sep 2016 | S |
| D766434 | DaCosta | Sep 2016 | S |
| D766437 | DaCosta | Sep 2016 | S |
| D766438 | DaCosta | Sep 2016 | S |
| D766439 | DaCosta | Sep 2016 | S |
| 9452057 | Dacosta et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9522023 | Haddad et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9750538 | Soffiatti et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9785747 | Geebelen | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9980760 | Dacosta et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10028750 | Rose | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10064631 | Dacosta et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10159499 | Dacosta et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10292713 | Fallin et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10327829 | Dacosta et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10376268 | Fallin et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10470779 | Fallin et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10779867 | Penzimer et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 11304705 | Fallin et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
| 20020099381 | Maroney | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107519 | Dixon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165552 | Duffner | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198531 | Millard et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20040010259 | Keller et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039394 | Conti et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097946 | Dietzel et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138669 | Horn | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004676 | Schon et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050059978 | Sherry et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070909 | Egger et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075641 | Singhatat et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101961 | Huebner et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149042 | Metzger | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228389 | Stiernborg | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251147 | Novak | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267482 | Hyde, Jr. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273112 | McNamara | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060129163 | McGuire | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206044 | Simon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217733 | Plassky et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229621 | Cadmus | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241607 | Myerson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241608 | Myerson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060264961 | Murray-Brown | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070010818 | Stone et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123857 | Deffenbaugh et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233138 | Figueroa et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265634 | Weinstein | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276383 | Rayhack | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080009863 | Bond et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080015603 | Collazo | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039850 | Rowley et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091197 | Coughlin | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140081 | Heavener et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147073 | Ammann et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172054 | Claypool et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195215 | Morton | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208252 | Holmes | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080262500 | Collazo | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080269908 | Warburton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288004 | Schendel | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090036893 | Kartalian et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090036931 | Pech et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054899 | Ammann et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090093849 | Grabowski | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105767 | Reiley | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090118733 | Orsak et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198244 | Leibel | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198279 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222047 | Graham | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254092 | Albiol | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254126 | Orbay et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287309 | Walch et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100069910 | Hasselman | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121334 | Couture et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100130981 | Richards | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100152782 | Stone et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100168799 | Schumer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185245 | Paul et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249779 | Hotchkiss et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100256687 | Neufeld et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318088 | Warne et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100324556 | Tyber et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110009865 | Orfaly | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093084 | Morton | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110118739 | Tyber et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110178524 | Lawrence et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110245835 | Dodds et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110288550 | Orbay et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301648 | Lofthouse et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120016426 | Robinson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120065689 | Prasad et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120078258 | Lo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120123420 | Honiball | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120123484 | Lietz et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120130376 | Loring et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120130382 | Iannotti et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120130383 | Budoff | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120184961 | Johannaber | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185056 | Warburton | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120191199 | Raemisch | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120239045 | Li | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120253350 | Anthony et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120265301 | Demers et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277745 | Lizee | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120303033 | Weiner et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120330135 | Millahn et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130012949 | Fallin et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130035694 | Grimm et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130085499 | Lian | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130085502 | Harrold | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130096563 | Meade et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131821 | Cachia | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130150900 | Haddad et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130150903 | Vincent | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158556 | Jones et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130165936 | Myers | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130165938 | Chow et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130172942 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130184714 | Kaneyama et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130190765 | Harris et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130190766 | Harris et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204259 | Zajac | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130226248 | Hatch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130226252 | Mayer | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130231668 | Olsen et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130237987 | Graham | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130237989 | Bonutti | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130267956 | Terrill et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130310836 | Raub et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325019 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325076 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331845 | Horan et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130338785 | Wong | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140005672 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140025127 | Richter | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140039501 | Schickendantz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140039561 | Weiner et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140046387 | Waizenegger | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074099 | Vigneron et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074101 | Collazo | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094861 | Fallin | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094924 | Hacking et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140135775 | Maxson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140163563 | Reynolds et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140171953 | Gonzalvez et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140180342 | Lowery et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140188139 | Fallin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194884 | Martin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194999 | Orbay et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140207144 | Lee et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140249537 | Wong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257308 | Johannaber | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257509 | Dacosta et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276815 | Riccione | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276853 | Long | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277176 | Buchanan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277214 | Helenbolt et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140288562 | Von Zabern et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296995 | Reiley et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140303621 | Gerold et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140336658 | Luna et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140343555 | Russi et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140350561 | Dacosta et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150032168 | Orsak et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150045801 | Axelson, Jr. et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150045839 | Dacosta et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150051650 | Verstreken et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150057667 | Ammann et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150066094 | Prandi et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150112446 | Melamed et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150119944 | Geldwert | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150142064 | Perez et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150150608 | Sammarco | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182273 | Stemniski et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150223851 | Hill et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150245858 | Weiner et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20160015426 | Dayton | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160022315 | Soffiatti et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160135858 | Dacosta et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160151165 | Fallin et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160175089 | Fallin et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160192950 | Dayton et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160199076 | Fallin et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160213384 | Fallin et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160235414 | Hatch et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160242791 | Fallin et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160256204 | Patel et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160324532 | Montoya et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160354127 | Lundquist et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170042598 | Santrock et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170042599 | Bays et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170143511 | Cachia | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170164989 | Weiner et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20180132868 | Dacosta et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344334 | Kim et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2009227957 | Jul 2014 | AU |
| 2491824 | Sep 2005 | CA |
| 2854997 | May 2013 | CA |
| 695846 | Sep 2006 | CH |
| 2930668 | Aug 2007 | CN |
| 201558162 | Aug 2010 | CN |
| 201572172 | Sep 2010 | CN |
| 201586060 | Sep 2010 | CN |
| 201912210 | Aug 2011 | CN |
| 101237835 | Nov 2012 | CN |
| 202801773 | Mar 2013 | CN |
| 103462675 | Dec 2013 | CN |
| 103505276 | Jan 2014 | CN |
| 203458450 | Mar 2014 | CN |
| 103735306 | Apr 2014 | CN |
| 102860860 | May 2014 | CN |
| 203576647 | May 2014 | CN |
| 104490460 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 104510523 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 104523327 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 104546102 | Apr 2015 | CN |
| 204379413 | Jun 2015 | CN |
| 204410951 | Jun 2015 | CN |
| 204428143 | Jul 2015 | CN |
| 204428144 | Jul 2015 | CN |
| 204428145 | Jul 2015 | CN |
| 204446081 | Jul 2015 | CN |
| 202006010241 | Mar 2007 | DE |
| 102007053058 | Apr 2009 | DE |
| 685206 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1508316 | May 2007 | EP |
| 1897509 | Jul 2009 | EP |
| 2124772 | Dec 2009 | EP |
| 2124832 | Aug 2012 | EP |
| 2632349 | Sep 2013 | EP |
| 2665428 | Nov 2013 | EP |
| 2742878 | Jun 2014 | EP |
| 2750617 | Jul 2014 | EP |
| 2849684 | Mar 2015 | EP |
| 2624764 | Dec 2015 | EP |
| 3023068 | May 2016 | EP |
| 2362616 | Mar 1978 | FR |
| 2764183 | Nov 1999 | FR |
| 2953120 | Jan 2012 | FR |
| 3030221 | Jun 2016 | FR |
| 2154143 | Sep 1985 | GB |
| 2154144 | Sep 1985 | GB |
| 2334214 | Jan 2003 | GB |
| 200903719 | Jun 2009 | IN |
| 200904479 | May 2010 | IN |
| 140DELNP2012 | Feb 2013 | IN |
| 2004KOLNP2013 | Nov 2013 | IN |
| S635739 | Jan 1988 | JP |
| H0531116 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 2004174265 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2006158972 | Jun 2006 | JP |
| 4134243 | Aug 2008 | JP |
| 2008537498 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 4162380 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 2011092405 | May 2011 | JP |
| 2011523889 | Aug 2011 | JP |
| 4796943 | Oct 2011 | JP |
| 5466647 | Apr 2014 | JP |
| 2014511207 | May 2014 | JP |
| 2014521384 | Aug 2014 | JP |
| 5628875 | Nov 2014 | JP |
| 100904142 | Jun 2009 | KR |
| 756 | Nov 2014 | MD |
| 2098036 | Dec 1997 | RU |
| 2195892 | Jan 2003 | RU |
| 2320287 | Mar 2008 | RU |
| 2321366 | Apr 2008 | RU |
| 2321369 | Apr 2008 | RU |
| 2346663 | Feb 2009 | RU |
| 2412662 | Feb 2011 | RU |
| 1333328 | Aug 1987 | SU |
| 0166022 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 03075775 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| 2004089227 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| 2008051064 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2009029798 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| 2009032101 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| 2011037885 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| 2012029008 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2013090392 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| 2013134387 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| 2013169475 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2014020561 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| 2014022055 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| 2014035991 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| 2014085882 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| 2014147099 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014152219 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014152535 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014177783 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| 2014200017 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2015094409 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| 2015105880 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| 2015127515 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2016134160 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Accu-Cut Osteotomy Guide System,” BioPro, Brochure, Oct. 2018, 2 pages. |
| “Acumed Osteotomiesystem Operationstechnik,” Acumed, 2014, 19 pages (including 3 pages English translation). |
| Albano et al., “Biomechanical Study of Transcortical or Transtrabecular Bone Fixation of Patellar Tendon Graft wih Bioabsorbable Pins in ACL Reconstruction in Sheep,” Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Rev Bras Ortop.) vol. 47, No. 1, 2012, pp. 43-49. |
| Anderson et al., “Uncemented STAR Total Ankle Prostheses,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 86(1, Suppl 2), Sep. 2004, pp. 103-111, (Abstract Only). |
| Blomer, “Knieendoprothetik—Herstellerische Probleme und technologische Entwicklungen,” Orthopade, vol. 29, 2000, pp. 688-696, including English Abstract on p. 689. |
| Bouaicha et al., “Fixation of Maximal Shift Scarf Osteotomy with Inside-Out Plating: Technique Tip,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 32, No. 5, May 2011, pp. 567-569. |
| Dayton et al., “Is Our Current Paradigm for Evaluation and Management of the Bunion Deformity Flawed? A Discussion of Procedure Philosophy Relative to Anatomy,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 54, 2015, pp. 102-111. |
| Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal and Transverse Plane Rotation of the Hallux: Does the Hallux Drive the Metatarsal in a Bunion Deformity?,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 584-587. |
| Dayton et al., “Relationship Of Frontal Plane Rotation Of First Metatarsal To Proximal Articular Set Angle And Hallux Alignment In Patients Undergoing Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis For Hallux Abducto Valgus: A Case Series And Critical Review Of The Literature,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, No. 3, May/Jun. 2013, pp. 348-354. |
| Dayton et al., “Quantitative Analysis of the Degree of Frontal Rotation Required to Anatomically Align the First Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint During Modified Tarsal-Metatarsal Arthrodesis Without Capsular Balancing,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2015, pp. 1-6. |
| De Geer et al., “A New Measure of Tibial Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus in Relation to the Coronal Rotation of the First Metatarsal in CT Scans,” Foot and Ankle International, Mar. 26, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Didomenico et al., “Correction of Frontal Plane Rotation of Sesamoid Apparatus during the Lapidus Procedure: A Novel Approach,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 248-251. |
| Dobbe et al. “Patient-Tailored Plate For Bone Fixation And Accurate 3D Positioning In Corrective Osteotomy,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 51, No. 1-2, Feb. 2013, pp. 19-27, (Abstract Only). |
| EBI Extra Small Rail Fixator, Biomet Trauma, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://footandanklefixation.com/product/biomet-trauma-ebi-extra-small-rail-fixator>, 7 pages. |
| “Futura Forefoot Implant Arthroplasty Products,” Tornier, Inc., 2008, 14 pages. |
| Garthwait, “Accu-Cut System Facilitates Enhanced Precision,” Podiatry Today, vol. 18, No. 6, Jun. 2005, 6 pages. |
| Gonzalez Del Pino et al., “Variable Angle Locking Intercarpal Fusion System for Four-Corner Arthrodesis: Indications and Surgical Technique,” Journal of Wrist Surgery, vol. 1, No. 1, Aug. 2012, pp. 73-78. |
| Gotte, “Entwicklung eines Assistenzrobotersystems für die Knieendoprothetik,” Forschungsberichte, Technische Universitat Munchen, 165, 2002, 11 pages, including partial English Translation. |
| Gregg et al., “Plantar plate repair and Weil osteotomy for metatarsophalangeal joint instability,” Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 13, 2007, pp. 116-121. |
| Grondal et al., “A Guide Plate for Accurate Positioning of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint during Fusion,” Operative Orthopädie Und Traumatologie, vol. 16, No. 2, 2004, pp. 167-178 (Abstract Only). |
| “Hat-Trick Lesser Toe Repair System,” Smith & Nephew, Brochure, Aug. 2014, 12 pages. |
| “Hat-Trick Lesser Toe Repair System, Foot and Ankle Technique Guide, Metatarsal Shortening Osteotomy Surgical Technique,” Smith & Nephew, 2014, 16 pages. |
| Hetherington et al., “Evaluation of surgical experience and the use of an osteotomy guide on the apical angle of an Austin osteotomy,” The Foot, vol. 18, 2008, pp. 159-164. |
| Hirao et al., “Computer assisted planning and custom-made surgical guide for malunited pronation deformity after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis: A case report,” Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 19, Nos. 1-3, 2014, pp. 13-19. |
| “Hoffmann II Compact External Fixation System,” Stryker, Brochure, Literature No. 5075-1-500, 2006, 12 pages. |
| “Hoffmann II Micro Lengthener,” Stryker, Operative Technique, Literature No. 5075-2-002, 2008, 12 pages. |
| “Hoffmann Small System External Fixator Orthopedic Instruments,” Stryker, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Stryker-Hoffmann-Small-System-External-Fixator_1438850129.html>, 3 pages. |
| Kim et al., “A New Measure of Tibial Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus in Relation to the Coronal Rotation of the First Metatarsal in CT Scans,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 36, No. 8, 2015, pp. 944-952. |
| “Lag Screw Target Bow,” Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG, Germany 2004, 8 pages. |
| Lieske et al., “Implantation einer Sprunggelenktotalendo-prothese vom Typ Salto 2,” Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, vol. 26, No. 4, 2014, pp. 401-413, including English Abstract on p. 403. |
| MAC (Multi Axial Correction) Fixation System, Biomet Trauma, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://footandanklefixation.com/product/biomet-trauma-mac-multi-axial-correction-fixation-system>, 7 pages. |
| Magin, “Computernavigierter Gelenkersatz am Knie mit dem Orthopilot,” Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, vol. 22, No. 1, 2010, pp. 63-80, including English Abstract on p. 64. |
| Magin, “Die belastungsstabile Lapidus-Arthrodese bei Hallux-valgus-Deformität mittels IVP-Plattenfixateur (V-TEK-System),” Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, vol. 26, No. 2, 2014, pp. 184-195, including English Abstract on p. 186. |
| Michelangelo Bunion System, Surgical Technique, InsliaLek Incorporated, publication date unknown, 4 pages. |
| Mini Joint Distractor, Arthrex, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://www.arthrex.com/foot-ankle/mini-joint-distractor/products>, 2 pages. |
| MiniRail System, Small Bone Innovations, Surgical Technique, 2010, 24 pages. |
| Miyake et al., “Three-Dimensional Corrective Osteotomy for Malunited Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures Using Custom-Made Surgical Guides Based on Computer Simulation,” JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques, vol. 2, No. 4, 2012, 11 pages. |
| Modular Rail System: External Fixator, Smith & Nephew, Surgical Technique, 2013, 44 pages. |
| Monnich et al., “A Hand Guided Robotic Planning System for Laser Osteotomy in Surgery,” World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering vol. 25/6: Surgery, Nimimal Invasive Interventions, Endoscopy and Image Guided Therapy, Sep. 7-12, 2009, pp. 59-62, (Abstract Only). |
| Moore et al., “Effect Of Ankle Flexion Angle On Axial Alignment Of Total Ankle Replacement,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 12, Dec. 2010, pp. 1093-1098, (Abstract Only). |
| Mortier et al., “Axial Rotation of the First Metatarsal Head in a Normal Population and Hallux Valgus Patients,” Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research, vol. 98, 2012, pp. 677-683. |
| Nagy et al., “The AO Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy System Indications and Surgical Technique,” Journal of Wrist Surgery, vol. 3, No. 2, 2014, pp. 91-97. |
| NexFix from Nexa Orthopedics, MetaFix I from Merete Medical, Inc. and The BioPro Lower Extremities from BioPro, found in Foot & Ankle International Journal, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 2007, 4 pages. |
| Odenbring et al., “A guide instrument for high tibial osteotomy,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 60, No. 4, 1989, pp. 449-451. |
| Okuda et al., “Postoperative Incomplete Reduction of the Sesamoids as a Risk Factor for Recurrence of Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 91-A, No. 1, Jul. 2009, pp. 1637-1645. |
| Otsuki et al., “Developing a novel custom cutting guide for curved per-acetabular osteotomy,” International Orthopaedics (SICOT), vol. 37, 2013, pp. 1033-1038. |
| “Patient to Patient Precision, Accu-Cut, Osteotomy Guide System,” BioPro, Foot & Ankle International Journal, vol. 23, No. 8, Aug. 2002, 2 pages. |
| Peters et al., “Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon Laceration as a Complication of Total Ankle Arthroplasty,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 34, No. 1, 2013, pp. 148-149. |
| “Prophecy Inbone Preoperative Navigation Guides,” Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Nov. 2013, 6 pages. |
| “Rayhack Ulnar Shortening Generation II Low-Profile Locking System Surgical Technique,” Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Dec. 2013, 20 pages. |
| Rx-Fix Mini Rail External Fixator, Wright Medical Technology, Brochure, Aug. 15, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Saltzman et al., “Prospective Controlled Trial of STAR Total Ankle Replacement Versus Ankle Fusion: Initial Results,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 30, No. 7, Jul. 2009, pp. 579-596. |
| Scanlan et al. “Technique Tip: Subtalar Joint Fusion Using a Parallel Guide and Double Screw Fixation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 49, Issue 3, May-Jun. 2010, pp. 305-309, (Abstract Only). |
| Scranton Jr. et al, “Anatomic Variations in the First Ray: Part I. Anatomic Aspects Related to Bunion Surgery,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 151, Sep. 1980, pp. 244-255. |
| Siddiqui et al. “Fixation Of Metatarsal Fracture With Bone Plate In A Dromedary Heifer,” Open Veterinary Journal, vol. 3, No. 1, 2013, pp. 17-20. |
| Sidekick Stealth Rearfoot Fixator, Wright Medical Technology, Surgical Technique, Dec. 2, 2013, 20 pages. |
| Simpson et al., “Computer-Assisted Distraction Ostegogenesis By Ilizarov's Method,” International Journal of Medical Robots and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 4, No. 4, Dec. 2008, pp. 310-320, (Abstract Only). |
| Small Bone External Fixation System, Acumed, Surgical Technique, Effective date Sep. 2014, 8 pages. |
| “Smith & Nephew scores a HAT-TRICK with its entry into the high-growth hammer toe repair market,” Smith & Nephew, Jul. 31, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Stableloc External Fixation System, Acumed, Product Overview, Effective date Sep. 2015, 4 pages. |
| Stahl et al., “Derotation Of Post-Traumatic Femoral Deformities By Closed Intramedullary Sawing,” Injury, vol. 37, No. 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 145-151, (Abstract Only). |
| Talbot et al., “Assessing Sesamoid Subluxation: How Good is the AP Radiograph?,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 19, No. 8, Aug. 1998, pp. 547-554. |
| TempFix Spanning the Ankle Joint Half Pin and Transfixing Pin Techniques, Biomet Orthopedics, Surgical Technique, 2012, 16 pages. |
| Tricot et al., “3D-corrective osteotomy using surgical guides for posttraumatic distal humeral deformity,” Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, vol. 78, No. 4, 2012, pp. 538-542. |
| Vitek et al., “Die Behandlung des Hallux rigidus mit Cheilektomie und Akin-Moberg-Osteotomie unter Verwendung einer neuen Schnittlehre und eines neuen Schraubensystems,” Orthopadische Praxis, vol. 44, Nov. 2008, pp. 563-566, including English Abstract on p. 564. |
| Vitek, “Neue Techniken in der Fußchirurgie Das V-tek-System,” ABW Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, 2009, 11 pages, including English Abstract. |
| Weber et al., “A Simple System For Navigation Of Bone Alignment Osteotomies Of The Tibia,” International Congress Series, vol. 1268, Jan. 2004, pp. 608-613, (Abstract Only). |
| Weil et al., “Anatomic Plantar Plate Repair Using the Weil Metatarsal Osteotomy Approach,” Foot & Ankle Specialist, vol. 4, No. 3, 2011, pp. 145-150. |
| Wendl et al., “Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik,” OP-Journal, vol. 17, 2002, pp. 22-27, including English Abstract. |
| Whipple et al., “Zimmer Herbert Whipple Bone Screw System: Surgical Techniques for Fixation of Scaphoid and Other Small Bone Fractures,” Zimmer, 2003, 59 pages. |
| Yakacki et al. “Compression Forces of Internal and External Ankle Fixation Devices with Simulated Bone Resorption,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 76-85, (Abstract Only). |
| Yasuda et al., “Proximal Supination Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal for Hallux Valgus,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 36, No. 6, Jun. 2015, pp. 696-704. |
| European Patent Application No. 16847367.6, Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 18, 2019, 9 pages. |
| International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/052087, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 20, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Alvine et al., “Peg and Dowel Fusion of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint,” Foot & Ankle, vol. 1, No. 2, 1980, pp. 90-94. |
| Bednarz et al., “Modified Lapidus Procedure for the Treatment of Hypermobile Hallux Valgus,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 21, No. 10, Oct. 2000, pp. 816-821. |
| Carr et al., “Correctional Osteotomy for Metatarsus Primus Varus and Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 50-A, No. 7, Oct. 1968, pp. 1353-1367. |
| Coetzee et al., “The Lapidus Procedure: A Prospective Cohort Outcome Study,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 25, No. 8, Aug. 2004, pp. 526-531. |
| Doty et al., “Hallux valgus and hypermobility of the first ray: facts and fiction,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 37, 2013, pp. 1655-1660. |
| Galli et al., “Enhanced Lapidus Arthrodesis: Crossed Screw Technique With Middle Cuneiform Fixation Further Reduces Sagittal Mobility,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 54, vol. 3, May/Jun. 2015, published online Nov. 21, 2014, pp. 437-440. |
| Lapidus, “The Author's Bunion Operation From 1931 to 1959,” Clinical Orthopaedics, vol. 16,1960, pp. 119-135. |
| Osher et al., “Accurate Determination of Relative Metatarsal Protrusion with a Small Intermetatarsal Angle: A Novel Simplified Method,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2014, published online Jun. 3, 2014, pp. 548-556. |
| Patel et al., “Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis: Rate of Nonunion in 227 Cases,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 43, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 2004, pp. 37-42. |
| Toth et al., “The Effect of First Ray Shortening in the Development of Metatarsalgia in the Second Through Fourth Rays After Metatarsal Osteotomy,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 61-63. |
| Dayton et al., “Comparison of the Mechanical Characteristics of a Universal Small Biplane Plating Technique Without Compression Screw and Single Anatomic Plate With Compression Screw,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 55, No. 3, May/Jun. 2016, published online: Feb. 9, 2016, pp. 567-571. |
| Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 41 pages. |
| Prior Art Publications, Exhibit A of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 3 pages. |
| Claim Chart for Fishco, “Making the Lapidus Easy,” The Podiatry Institute (Apr. 2014), Exhibit B1 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 97 pages. |
| Claim Chart for Fishco, “A Straightforward Guide to the Lapidus Bunionectomy,” HMP Global (Sep. 6, 2013), Exhibit B2 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 67 pages. |
| Claim Chart for Groves, “Functional Position Joint Sectioning: Pre-Load Method for Lapidus Arthrodesis,” Update 2015: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Podiatry Institute, Chpt. 6, pp. 23-29 (Apr. 2015), Exhibit B3 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 151 pages. |
| Claim Chart for Mote, “First Metatarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis for the Treatment of First Ray Pathology: A Technical Guide,” The Journal Foot & Ankle Surgery (Sep. 1, 2009), Exhibit B5 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 21 pages. |
| Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 10,376,268 to Fallin et al., entitled “Indexed Tri-Planar Osteotomy Guide and Method,” Issued Aug. 13, 2019, Exhibit B6 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 155 pages. |
| Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 8,282,645 to Lawrence et al., entitled “Metatarsal Bone Implant Cutting Guide,” issued Jan. 18, 2010, Exhibit B7 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 76 pages. |
| Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,057 to Dacosta et al., entitled “Bone Implants and Cutting Apparatuses and Methods,” issued Apr. 8, 2011, Exhibit B8 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 110 pages. |
| Obviousness Chart, Exhibit C of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 153 pages. |
| “Foot and Ankle Instrument Set,” Smith & Nephew, 2013, 2 pages. |
| “Lapidus Pearls: Gaining Joint Exposure to Decrease Non-Union,” Youtube, Retrieved online from <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jqJyE7pj-Y>, dated Nov. 2, 2009, 3 pages. |
| “Reconstructive Surgery of the Foot & Ankle,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2015, Conference Program, May 2015, 28 pages. |
| “Speed Continuous Active Compression Implant,” BioMedical Enterprises, Inc., A120-029 Rev. 3, 2013, 4 pages. |
| “Visionaire: Patient Matched Cutting Blocks Surgical Procedure,” Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2009, 2 pages. |
| Arthrex, “Comprehensive Foot System,” Retrieved online from <https://www.arthrex.com/resources/animation/8U3iaPvY6kO8bwFAwZF50Q/comprehensive-foot-system?referringTeam=foot_and_ankle>, dated Aug. 27, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Baravarian, “Why the Lapidus Procedure is Ideal for Bunions,” Podiatry Today, Retrieved online from <https://www.nmpgloballearhmpgloballe.com/site/podipodi/article/5542>, dated May 2006, 8 pages. |
| Bauer et al., “Offset-V Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal Shaft in Hallux Abducto Valgus,” McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Fourth Edition, vol. 1, Chapter 29, 2013, 26 pages. |
| Cottom, “Fixation of the Lapidus Arthrodesis with a Plantar Interfragmentary Screw and Medial Low Profile Locking Plate,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 51, 2012, pp. 517-522. |
| Coughlin, “Fixation of the Lapidus Arthrodesis with a Plantar Interfragmentary Screw and Medial Low Profile Locking Plate,”Orthopaedics and Traumatology, vol. 7, 1999, pp. 133-143. |
| Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal Plane Rotation of the First Metatarsal in a Cadaveric Foot Model,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 274-278. |
| Dayton et al., “Relationship of Frontal Plane Rotation of First Metatarsal to Proximal Articular Set Angle and Hallux Alignment in Patients Undergoing Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis for Hallux Abducto Valgus: A Case Series and Critical Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, 2013, Article in Press, Mar. 1, 2013, 7 pages. |
| DiDomenico et al., “Lapidus Bunionectomy: First Metatarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis,” McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Fourth Edition, vol. 1, Chapter 31, 2013, 24 pages. |
| Fallin et al., US Provisional Application Entitled Indexed Tri-Planar Osteotomy Guide and Method, U.S. Appl. No. 62/118,378, filed Feb. 19, 2015, 62 pages. |
| Fishco, “A Straightforward Guide To The Lapidus Bunionectomy,” Podiatry Today, Retrieved online from <https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/podiatry/blogged/straightforward-guide-lapidus-bunionectomy>, dated Sep. 6, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Fishco, “Making the Lapidus Easy,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2014, Chapter 14, 2014, pp. 91-93. |
| Fleming et al., “Results of Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis Procedure Using Medial Eminence as an Interpositional Autograft,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 272-275. |
| Fuhrmann, “Arthrodesis of the First Tarsometatarsal Joint for Correction of the Advanced Splayfoot Accompanied by a Hallux Valgus,” Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, No. 2, 2005, pp. 195-210. |
| Gerard et al., “The Modified Lapidus Procedure,” Orthopedics, vol. 31, No. 3, Mar. 2008, 7 pages. |
| Giannoudis et al., “Hallux Valgus Correction,” Practical Procedures in Elective Orthopaedic Surgery, Pelvis and Lower Extremity, Chapter 38, 2012, 22 pages. |
| Greiner, “The Jargon of Pedal Movements,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 109-125. |
| Groves, “Functional Position Joint Sectioning: Pre-Load Method for Lapidus Arthrodesis,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2015, Chapter 6, 2015, pp. 23-29. |
| Hardy et al., “Observations on Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 33B, No. 3, Aug. 1951, pp. 376-391. |
| Holmes, Jr., “Correction of the Intermetatarsal Angle Component of Hallux Valgus Using Fiberwire-Attached Endo-buttons,” Revista Internacional de Ciencias Podologicas, vol. 6, No. 2, 2012, pp. 73-79. |
| Integra, “Integra Large Qwix Positioning and Fixation Screw, Surgical Technique,” 2012, 16 pages. |
| Kilmartin et al., “Combined rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies for hallux valgus: a patient focused 9 year follow up of 50 patients,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, vol. 3, No. 2, 2010, 12 pages. |
| Lee et al., “Technique Tip: Lateral Soft-Tissue Release for Correction of Hallux Valgus Through a Medial Incision Using A Dorsal Flap Over the First Metatarsal,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 8, Aug. 2007, pp. 949-951. |
| Mote et al., “First Metatarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis for the Treatment of First Ray Pathology: A Technical Guide,” JFAS Techniques Guide, vol. 48, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2009, pp. 593-601. |
| Myerson, “Cuneiform-Metatarsal Arthrodesis,” The Foot and Ankle, Chapter 9, 1997, pp. 107-117. |
| Sammarco, “Surgical Strategies: Mau Osteotomy for Correction of Moderate and Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 7, Jul. 2007, pp. 857-864. |
| Schon et al., “Cuneiform-Metatarsal Arthrodesis for Hallux Valgus,” The Foot and Ankle, Second Edition, Chapter 8, 2002, pp. 99-117. |
| Sokoloff, “Lapidus Procedure,” Textbook of Bunion Surgery, Chapter 15, 1981, pp. 277-287. |
| Stamatis et al., “Mini Locking Plate as “Medial Buttress” for Oblique Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 10, Oct. 2010, pp. 920-922. |
| Stewart, “Use for BME Speed Nitinol Staple Fixation for the Lapidus Procedure,” date unknown, 1 page. |
| Wukich et al., “Hypermobility of the First Tarsometatarsal Joint,” Foot and Ankle Clinics, vol. 10, No. 1, Mar. 2005, pp. 157-166. |
| Dayton et al., “Biwinged Excision for Round Pedal Lesions,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 35, No. 3, 1996, pp. 244-249. |
| Dayton et al., “Medial Incision Approach to the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 40, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 414-417. |
| Dayton et al., “Reduction of the Intermetatarsal Angle after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis in Patients with Moderate and Severe Metatarsus Primus Adductus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 41, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2002, pp. 316-319. |
| Dayton et al., “Use of the Z Osteotomy for Tailor Bunionectomy,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 42, No. 3, May/Jun. 2003, pp. 167-169. |
| Dayton et al., “Early Weightbearing After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Observational Case Analysis,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 43, No. 3, May/Jun. 2004, pp. 156-159. |
| Dayton et al., “Dorsal Suspension Stitch: An Alternative Stabilization After Flexor Tenotomy for Flexible Hammer Digit Syndrome,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 48, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2009, pp. 602-605. |
| Dayton et al., “The Extended Knee Hemilithotomy Position for Gastrocnemius Recession,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 214-216. |
| Wienke et al., “Bone Stimulation For Nonunions: What the Evidence Reveals,” Podiatry Today, vol. 24, No. 9, Sep. 2011, pp. 52-57. |
| Dayton et al., “Hallux Varus as Complication of Foot Compartment Syndrome,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 504-506. |
| Dayton et al., “Measurement of Mid-Calcaneal Length on Plain Radiographs: Reliability of a New Method,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 2011, pp. 280-283. |
| Dayton et al., “A User-Friendly Method of Pin Site Management for External Fixators,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, Sep. 16, 2011, 4 pages. |
| Dayton et al., “Effectiveness of a Locking Plate in Preserving Midcalcaneal Length and Positional Outcome after Evans Calcaneal Osteotomy: A Retrospective Pilot Study,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, 2013, pp. 710-713. |
| Dayton et al., “Does Postoperative Showering or Bathing of a Surgical Site Increase the Incidence of Infection? A Systematic Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, 2013, pp. 612-614. |
| Dayton et al., “Technique for Minimally Invasive Reduction of Calcaneal Fractures Using Small Bilateral External Fixation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Dayton et al., “Clarification of the Anatomic Definition of the Bunion Deformity,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 160-163. |
| Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal Plane Rotation of the First Metatarsal in a Cadaveric Foot Model,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in First Metatarsal and Medial Cuneiform Positions after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 32-35. |
| Dayton et al., “Reduction of the Intermetatarsal Angle after First Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 4 pages. |
| Feilmeier et al., “Reduction of Intermetatarsal Angle after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis in Patients with Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 29-31. |
| Dayton et al., “Principles of Management of Growth Plate Fractures in the Foot and Ankle,” Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Foot Deformities, Oct. 2013, 17 pages. |
| Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal and Transverse Plane Rotation of the Hallux: Does the Hallux Drive the Metatarsal in a Bunion Deformity?,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 4 pages. |
| Rodriguez et al., “Ilizarov method of fixation for the management of pilon and distal tibial fractures in the compromised diabetic patient: A technique guide,” The Foot and Ankle Journal Online, vol. 7, No. 2, 2014, 9 pages. |
| Feilmeier et al., “Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in the Foot and Ankle with Early Exposure and Showering of Surgical Sites: A Prospective Observation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 173-175. |
| Catanese et al., “Measuring Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus: When Is the Sesamoid Axial View Necessary,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, 2014, 3 pages. |
| Dayton et al., “Comparison of Complications for Internal and External Fixation for Charcot Reconstruction: A Systematic Review,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Dayton et al., “A new triplanar paradigm for bunion management,” Lower Extremity Review, Apr. 2015, 9 pages. |
| Dayton et al., “American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons' Clinical Consensus Statement: Perioperative Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Clean Elective Foot Surgery,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 7 pages. |
| Dayton et al., “Complications of Metatarsal Suture Techniques for Bunion Correction: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 3 pages. |
| DeCarbo et al., “The Weil Osteotomy: A Refresher,” Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 13, No. 4, Dec. 2014, pp. 191-198. |
| DeCarbo et al., “Resurfacing Interpositional Arthroplasty for Degenerative Joint Diseas of the First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint,” Podiatry Management, Jan. 2013, pp. 137-142. |
| DeCarbo et al., “Locking Plates: Do They Prevent Complications?,” Podiatry Today, Apr. 2014, 7 pages. |
| Easley et al., “Current Concepts Review: Hallux Valgus Part II: Operative Treatment,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 6, Jun. 2007, pp. 748-758. |
| Kim et lal., “A Multicenter Retrospective Review of Outcomes for Arthrodesis, Hemi-Metallic Joint Implant, and Resectional Arthroplasty in the Surgical Treatment of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 51, 2012, pp. 50-56. |
| Easley et al., “Current Concepts Review: Hallux Valgus Part I: Pathomechanics, Clinical Assessment, and Nonoperative Management,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 5, May 2007, pp. 654-659. |
| Sandhu et al., “Digital Arthrodesis With a One-Piece Memory Nitinol Intramedullary Fixation Device: A Retrospective Review,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 6, No. 5, Oct. 2013, pp. 364-366. |
| Weber et al., “Use of the First Ray Splay Test to Assess Transverse Plane Instability Before First Metatarsocuneiform Fusion,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 45, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2006, pp. 278-282. |
| Smith et al., “Opening Wedge Osteotomies for Correction of Hallux Valgus: A Review of Wedge Plate Fixation,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 2, No. 6, Dec. 2009, pp. 277-282. |
| Easley et al., “What is the Best Treatment for Hallux Valgus?,” Evidence-Based Orthopaedics—The Best Answers to Clinical Questions, Chapter 73, 2009, pp. 479-491. |
| Shurnas et al., “Proximal Metatarsal Opening Wedge Osteotomy,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section I, Chapter 13, 2011, pp. 73-78. |
| Coetzee et al., “Revision Hallux Valgus Correction,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section I, Chapter 15, 2011, pp. 84-96. |
| Le et al., “Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section II, Chapter 40, 2011, pp. 281-285. |
| Collan et al., “The biomechanics of the first metatarsal bone in hallux valgus: A preliminary study utilizing a weight bearing extremity CT,” Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 19, 2013, pp. 155-161. |
| Eustace et al., “Hallux valgus, first metatarsal pronation and collapse of the medial longitudinal arch—a radiological correlation,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 23, 1994, pp. 191-194. |
| Mizuno et al., “Detorsion Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal Bone in Hallux Valgus,” Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Tokyo, 1956; 30:813-819. |
| Okuda et al., “The Shape of the Lateral Edge of the First Metatarsal Head as a Risk Factor for Recurrence of Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 89, 2007, pp. 2163-2172. |
| Okuda et al., “Proximal Metatarsal Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus: Comparison of Outcome for Moderate and Severe Deformities,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 29, No. 7, Jul. 2008, pp. 664-670. |
| D'Amico et al., “Motion of the First Ray: Clarification Through Investigation,” Journal of the American Podiatry Association, vol. 69, No. 1, Jan. 1979, pp. 17-23. |
| Groves, “Operative Report,” St. Tammany Parish Hospital, Date of Procedure, Mar. 26, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Claim Chart for Groves Public Use (Mar. 26, 2014), Exhibit B4 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 161 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200155176 A1 | May 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62366219 | Jul 2016 | US | |
| 62220530 | Sep 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15267531 | Sep 2016 | US |
| Child | 16750829 | US |
