This invention relates generally to electrical connectors and more specifically electrical connectors that can inhibit or eliminate the deterioration that occurs at an electrical junction of an aluminum conductor.
None
None
One of the electrical problems with numerous buildings has been the use of aluminum conductors and copper conductors in the same electrical system. Typically, an aluminum conductor is connected directly to the copper conductor through a pressure contact. While such an electrical system can work well for a number of years problems can arise as the electrical system ages.
A number of factors are believed to cause the problems of electrical failure and often fires in electrical junctions in an aluminum/copper electrical wiring system. As aluminum has a higher coefficient of thermal expansion than copper it is believed that the relative expansion between copper conductors and aluminum conductors can lead to loosing of the pressure contact between the conductors resulting in increased resistance which generates heat as the electrical current flows through the high resistance junction.
Another factor is that copper oxidizes over time to form a low resistance electrical conductive layer on the surface of the copper conductor while the oxidation of the aluminum does the opposite, namely, forms an oxidation layer of higher electrical resistance on the surface of the aluminum conductor. The increase resistance due to the presence of an aluminum oxidation layer at the junction between the aluminum and copper generates heat as the current passes therethrough. In addition, because of the different current carrying capacities of aluminum conductors and copper conductors the aluminum conductor in a electrical system may be larger than the copper conductor thus enhancing the connection loosing process as the conductors expand and contract in response to changes in temperature. As a result of various factors as well as the aging of the electrical system conditions arise that can cause fires due to presence of a junction of an aluminum conductor and a copper conductor.
The present invention provides an electrical connector for use in joining aluminum and copper conductors that minimize the occurrence of electrical system failure and the resulting fires. The system can quickly retrofitted to an existing system that uses aluminum and copper wires to thereby remove an electrical fire hazard.
The present invention comprises an electrical connector suitable for connecting an aluminum conductor through pressure contact with the electrical connector inhibiting or preventing corrosion between interfaces with the aluminum conductor. To inhibit or prevent conditions that can cause failure at the interfaces with the aluminum conductor a coating is placed on the electrical connector. To provide further inhibit or prevent conditions that can cause failure at the interfaces with the aluminum conductor the interface with the aluminum conductor can be covered with a sealant. To isolate the aluminum conductor it can be secured in an electrically conducting terminal block, which is positionable in an electrically insulated housing containing a sealant. To further protect the aluminum conductor interfaces from stress that might increase failure the aluminum conductor can be supported by a portion of the electrically insulated housing.
Extending outward from the front of housing 11 is a first tubular wire inlet or port 15, a second tubular wire inlet or port 16 and a third tubular wire inlet or port 17. Each of the tubular wire inlets provides a wire access passage to the terminal block compartment 13 to increase flashover distance and to provide strain relief by shifting the bending point of a conductor away from an electrical junction or interface of an aluminum connector. When the connector is used with both aluminum and copper conductors the use of one port for each conductor prevents copper and aluminum wires from being connected directly to each other. By connection of each conductor directly to the terminal block one can aid in inhibiting corrosion. While the invention can be used for connection of aluminum conductors to copper conductors it can also be used for connecting aluminum conductors to aluminum conductors and it also can be sized for various conductors. For example, the port can be sized for gauge 12 and 10 solid aluminum conductors. Thus one port could accommodate one size wire and another port accommodate a different size wire, a condition not uncommon in aluminum/copper electrical wiring systems.
A sealant 50, such as silicone or the like, is shown located over an encapsulating the connections or interfaces between the terminal screw 30 and the terminal wire passage 24 and the exposed conductor 41 for the purposes of inhibiting corrosion or oxidation on the conductor not protected by the insulation covering 42.
The neck 15, which contains a conductor port support surface 15a, extends outward to provide support for the electrical conductor 42 and thus relieve stress on the contact region between the screw end 32a and the electrical conductor 42.
Thus the present invention also includes the method of making an electrical connection in a terminal block wherein a minimum acceptable contact force with the electrical conductor can be achieved with a shearable screw. By having the connection pressure exceed a threshold one can create conditions wherein one obtains a good electrical connection even though dissimilar metal conductors such as aluminum and copper are connected to each other through the terminal block. While the use of a shearable terminal block screw provides for an automatic check on the needed amount of pressure on the conductor other methods of insuring sufficient contact pressure can be used such as a torque wrench. In this case the terminal block screw is tightened until a predetermined torque is reached and hence the desired contact pressure between the terminal block and the wire conductor. It should be understood that terminal block as used herein includes lugs or other types of devices for connecting terminal ends of conductors thereto.
Thus as illustrated in
This application is a divisional application of Ser. No. 12,313,448 filed Nov. 20, 2008 which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/265,392 filed Nov. 1, 2005. titled JUNCTION FAILURE INHIBITING CONNECTOR, which claims the benefit of provisional application 60/629,764; filed Nov. 20, 2004; titled Wire Connector.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1849595 | Shaw | Mar 1932 | A |
2190824 | Cook | Feb 1940 | A |
2516916 | Richards et al. | Aug 1950 | A |
2740735 | Swain | Apr 1956 | A |
2795770 | Toedtman | Jun 1957 | A |
2824819 | Smith | Feb 1958 | A |
3124409 | Nisula | Mar 1964 | A |
3339174 | Walter et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3350677 | Daum | Oct 1967 | A |
3577114 | Hawkins | May 1971 | A |
3622944 | Tsuchiya et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3622946 | Rogers | Nov 1971 | A |
3629806 | Wiechmann | Dec 1971 | A |
3683331 | Overholser | Aug 1972 | A |
3836941 | Izraeli | Sep 1974 | A |
3864013 | Levy | Feb 1975 | A |
3892459 | Dittmann et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3973824 | Chor | Aug 1976 | A |
3983314 | Filhaber | Sep 1976 | A |
3989331 | Hanlon | Nov 1976 | A |
4097108 | Prodel | Jun 1978 | A |
4188438 | Burns | Feb 1980 | A |
4189204 | Brown et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4269465 | Mueller | May 1981 | A |
4315175 | Hamilton et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4447109 | Hobart, Jr. | May 1984 | A |
4491496 | Laporte et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4498121 | Breedis et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4734061 | Randall et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
5102347 | Cote et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5186661 | Capper | Feb 1993 | A |
5419714 | Nagamine | May 1995 | A |
5439759 | Lippert et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5533912 | Fillinger et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5626785 | Rajnik et al. | May 1997 | A |
5690516 | Fillinger | Nov 1997 | A |
5848913 | Ashcraft | Dec 1998 | A |
5902156 | Geebelen et al. | May 1999 | A |
6074240 | Bradshaw et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6213808 | Whatmore et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231405 | Diconne et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6338658 | Sweeney | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6361381 | Koebbe | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6497592 | Beadle | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6632108 | Hohlfelder | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6739906 | Lawrence et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6817910 | Borgstrom et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839428 | Brower et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6854996 | Yaworski et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6939183 | Ferretti et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6997759 | Zahnen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7037128 | Yaworski et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7070458 | Axenbock et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080451 | Saito et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7438603 | Lewis | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7534148 | Schuttler et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7837517 | Lewis | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7896714 | Moist | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8202131 | Battle | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8512068 | Gassauer | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20040072474 | Nyblin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040121639 | Yaworski et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060155280 | Siebens et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20100304590 | Frassineti et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140322994 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60629764 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12313448 | Nov 2008 | US |
Child | 13986411 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11265392 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 12313448 | US |