1. Field of Invention
The invention is directed to a downhole clean-up tool for use in oil and gas wells, and in particular, to a downhole clean-up tool that is capable of self-cleaning debris out of the flow path so that the tool can continue to operate for a longer period of time.
2. Description of Art
Downhole tools for clean-up of debris in a wellbore are generally known and are referred to as “junk baskets.” In general, the junk baskets have a screen or other structure that catches debris within the tool as fluid flows through the tool. This occurs because the fluid carrying the debris flows through the tool such that at a point in the flow path, the speed of the fluid flowing through the tool decreases such that the junk or debris falls out of the flow path and into a basket.
Broadly, downhole tools for clean-up of debris within a well comprise a screen member in sliding engagement with an inner wall surface of a housing or mandrel. As the screen member becomes blocked, it moves from a first or initial position to a second or actuated position which causes a pressure change detectable at the surface of the wellbore. The pressure change causes the debris blocking fluid flow through the screen member to fall off the screen member thereby allowing an increase in fluid flow through the screen member. As a result, the screen member returns to its initial position and fluid again flows through the screen member for capturing by the screen member.
While the invention will be described in connection with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to that embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Referring now to
Toward upper end 21 of mandrel 20 is partition 30 which divides bore 25 into upper 17 bore and lower bore 19. As shown in
Further, as shown in
Disposed at lower end 22 of mandrel 20 is debris deflector member 40 having a closed upper end 42, bore 44, and opening 46. Debris deflector members such as debris deflector member 40 are known in the art. In general, fluid carrying pieces of debris is carried upward through bore 44 as indicated by the arrow in
Disposed in sliding engagement with flange 27 and inner wall surface 24 of mandrel 20 is sleeve 50. Sleeve 50 comprises upper end 51, lower end 52, outer wall surface 53, a portion of which is in sliding engagement with flange 27 and a portion of which is in sliding engagement with inner wall surface 24, and inner wall surface 54 defining bore 55. Affixed to lower end 52 of sleeve 50 is screen member 60. Screen member 60 can be any type of screen member known in the art. In general, screen member 60 includes one more apertures through which fluid is permitted to pass, yet larger debris is prevented from passing. As a result, the debris that is unable to pass through screen member 60 either falls off of screen into cavity 28 partially defined by inner wall surface 24 of mandrel 20 and an outer wall surface of debris deflector member 40, or becomes stuck on screen member 60.
As shown in
In operation, downhole tool 10 is included as part of a tubing or work string (not shown) that is then disposed within a wellbore (not shown). Conventional fluid circulation down through the work string is utilized to perform a reverse circulating action downhole to collect debris such as metal cuttings and other junk. The circulation of fluid through the work string flows debris upward through bore 44 of debris deflector member 40. In so doing, larger pieces of debris unable to pass through opening 46 are captured within a basket or cavity (not shown) in fluid communication with bore 44. The fluid and smaller pieces of debris capable of passing through opening 46 flow into lower portion 19 of mandrel 20 (see arrow in
To facilitate pulling the fluid up through bore 44 of debris deflector member 40 and, thus, through screen member 60, fluid is flowed down the work string to which downhole tool 10 is attached and into upper portion 17 of bore 25 of mandrel 20. This fluid is restricted from flowing into lower portion 19 of bore 25 by partition 30. Some of this fluid, however, is permitted to flow through partition 30 by flowing through port 32. In certain embodiments, port 32 accelerates the flow of the fluid to create a pressure differential between the fluid flowing out of port 32 and the fluid passing through screen member 60. In the embodiment of
As noted above, as the fluid is flowed upward through debris deflector 40, into lower portion 19 of bore 25 below screen member 60, and then through screen member 60, some debris becomes attached or trapped against screen member 60, thereby decreasing the efficacy of screen member 60 to remove debris from the fluid passing through screen member 60. As a result, the upper flowing fluid below screen member 60, facilitated by the fluid flowing out of port 32 and through port 29, causes sleeve 40 to move from the initial position (
In addition, the pressure differential caused by the fluid flowing through port 32 is lessened and such fluid is re-directed downward toward screen member 60. As a result, the pressure of the fluid flowing upward toward screen member 60 is no longer strong enough to push the attached or trapped debris into screen member 60 and, therefore, the debris attached or trapped in screen member 60 falls away and into cavity 28. Upon a sufficient amount of the attached/trapped debris being removed from screen member 60, return member 70 releases its stored energy and returns sleeve 50 toward the initial position. Consequently, port 29 is no longer blocked and debris clean-up operations can proceed until either all debris is removed from the wellbore, or the cavities of downhole tool 10 are filled. At that time, the work string, including downhole tool 10 together with all debris captured within downhole tool 10 or within another portion of the work string, can be retrieved from the wellbore.
Referring now to
Disposed in sliding engagement with flange 27 and outer wall surface 137 of wall 135 is sleeve 150. Sleeve 150 comprises upper end 151, lower end 152, outer wall surface 153, a portion of which is in sliding engagement with flange 27, and inner wall surface 154 defining bore 155. A portion of inner wall surface 154 at upper end 151 is in sliding engagement with outer wall surface 137. Disposed through outer wall surface 153 and inner wall surface 154 and in fluid communication with bore 155 are ports 157. Affixed to lower end 152 of sleeve 150 is screen member 60.
As shown in
In general, downhole tool 100 operates in a similar manner as the operation of the embodiments of
Upon a sufficient amount of the attached/trapped debris being removed from screen member 60, return member 70 releases its stored energy and returns sleeve 150 toward the initial position. Consequently, ports 134 become blocked and, in certain embodiments, port 29 is no longer blocked, so that debris clean-up operations can proceed until either all debris is removed from the wellbore, or the cavities of downhole tool 100 are filled. At that time, the work string, including downhole tool 100 together with all debris captured within downhole tool 100 or within another portion of the work string, can be retrieved from the wellbore.
As illustrated in
Sleeve 250 comprises upper end 251, lower end 252, outer wall surface 253, a portion of which is in sliding engagement with flange 27 and a portion of which is in sliding engagement with inner wall surface 24, and inner wall surface 254 defining bore 255. A portion of inner wall surface 154 at upper end 151 is in sliding engagement with outer wall surface 137. Disposed through upper end 151 in fluid communication with bore 255 are ports 257. Affixed to lower end 252 of sleeve 250 is screen member 60.
As shown in
In general, downhole tool 200 operates in a similar manner as the operation of the embodiments of
Upon a sufficient amount of the attached/trapped debris being removed from screen member 60, return member 70 releases its stored energy and returns sleeve 250 toward the initial position. Consequently, ports 134 become blocked and, in certain embodiments, port 29 is no longer blocked, so that debris clean-up operations can proceed until either all debris is removed from the wellbore, or the cavities of downhole tool 200 are filled. At that time, the work string, including downhole tool 200 together with all debris captured within downhole tool 200 or within another portion of the work string, can be retrieved from the wellbore.
It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the exact details of construction, operation, exact materials, or embodiments shown and described, as modifications and equivalents will be apparent to one skilled in the art. For example, each of the ports of the mandrel, partition, and sleeve can have any shape desired or necessary to facilitate operation of the downhole tools disclosed herein. Further, a nozzle or other device can be placed within the port(s) of the partition to increase the velocity of the incoming fluid as it flows through the ports. In addition, the partition is not required to include a central elongated extension or be angled as shown in the Figures. Moreover, the apertures in screen member can have any arrangement, size and dimensions as desired or necessary to restrict flow of debris through screen and to allow debris stuck on the screen member to be removed. Additionally, the return member is not required to be a coiled spring. Instead, the return member can comprise a compressible elastomeric device, a Bellville washer, and or the like. Further, one or more seals can be disposed along one or both of the outer wall surface of the sleeve, the inner wall surface of the mandrel, or along the flange disposed on the inner wall surface of the mandrel to isolate one or more areas. Moreover, the number, size, location, and orientation of the ports in the mandrel, partition, or sleeve can be modified as desired or necessary to facilitate the downhole tools disclosed herein operating as disclosed herein.
Further, it is to be understood that the term “wellbore” as used herein includes open-hole, cased, or any other type of wellbores. In addition, the use of the term “well” is to be understood to have the same meaning as “wellbore.” Moreover, in all of the embodiments discussed herein, upward, toward the surface of the well (not shown), is toward the top of Figures, and downward or downhole (the direction going away from the surface of the well) is toward the bottom of the Figures. However, it is to be understood that the tools may have their positions rotated in either direction any number of degrees. Accordingly, the tools can be used in any number of orientations easily determinable and adaptable to persons of ordinary skill in the art. Accordingly, the invention is therefore to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2787327 | Pearson et al. | Apr 1957 | A |
2894725 | Baker | Jul 1959 | A |
3023810 | Anderson | Mar 1962 | A |
3332497 | Page, Jr. | Jul 1967 | A |
3360048 | Watkins | Dec 1967 | A |
3500933 | Burba, Jr. et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
4059155 | Greer | Nov 1977 | A |
4217966 | Garrett | Aug 1980 | A |
4276931 | Murray | Jul 1981 | A |
4335788 | Murphey et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4390064 | Enen, Jr. et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4515212 | Krugh | May 1985 | A |
4588243 | Ramsey et al. | May 1986 | A |
4828026 | Nelson | May 1989 | A |
4857175 | Spinnler | Aug 1989 | A |
4880059 | Brandell et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5228518 | Wilson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5425424 | Reinhardt et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5524709 | Withers | Jun 1996 | A |
5533373 | Plester | Jul 1996 | A |
6112812 | Carter | Sep 2000 | A |
6176311 | Ryan | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179057 | Fontana et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202752 | Kuck et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6276452 | Davis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6341653 | Firmaniuk et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352129 | Best | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361272 | Bassett | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6397959 | Villarreal | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427776 | Hoffman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446737 | Fontana et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6543538 | Tolman et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6568475 | Grubb et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6607031 | Lynde et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6655459 | Mackay | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6719071 | Moyes | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6755256 | Murley et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6951251 | Penisson | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7069992 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7096975 | Aronstam et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114581 | Aronstam et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7174975 | Krueger et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7267172 | Hofman | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7478687 | Lynde et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7497260 | Telfer | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513303 | Hern | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7610957 | Davis et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7721822 | Krueger et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7753113 | Penisson | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7806203 | Krueger et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7861772 | Blair | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7987901 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8011450 | Krueger et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8225859 | Moidel et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
20010050185 | Calder et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020079104 | Garcie et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030098181 | Aronstam et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040251033 | Cameron et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050061508 | Surjaatmadja | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070272404 | Lynde et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100243258 | Fishbeck et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110024119 | Wolf et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110203848 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110253376 | Krpec | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120152522 | Lynde | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120160503 | Davis | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130168091 | Xu et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2883658 | Mar 2007 | CN |
2348226 | Sep 2000 | GB |
WO 9922112 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0004269 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0008295 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 03006778 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03025336 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2014/036817 dated Sep. 22, 2014. |
Don M. Hannegan, et al., Technologies Manage Well Pressures, The American Oil & Gas Reporter, Sep. 2001, pp. 87-93, National Publishers Group Inc., U.S.A. |
Anthony Hill and William Furlow, New Tool Addresses ECD Problem, Offshore, Jun. 2002, pp. 88-89, U.S.A., copy retrieved May 14, 2012, from http://www.pennenergy.com/index/petroleum/display/149477/articles/offshore/volume-62/issue-6/departments/drilling-production/new-tool-addresses-ecd-problem.html, pp. 1-3. |
P.A. Bern, et al., A New Downhole Tool for ECD Reduction, Feb. 19, 2003, pp. 1-4, SPE/IADC 79821, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., U.S.A. |
Sven Krüger, TurboLift Advanced ECD Control, Apr. 2005, pp. 1-13, Baker Hughes Incorporated/INTEQ, U.S.A. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140360725 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |