1. Field of Invention
The invention is directed to a downhole clean-up tool for use in oil and gas wells, and in particular, to a downhole clean-up tool that is capable of self-cleaning debris out of the flow path so that the tool can continue to operate for a longer period of time.
2. Description of Art
Downhole tools for clean-up of debris in a wellbore are generally known and are referred to as “junk baskets.” In general, the junk baskets have a screen or other structure that catches debris within the tool as fluid flows through the tool. This occurs because the fluid carrying the debris flows through the tool such that at a point in the flow path, the speed of the fluid flowing through the tool decreases such that the junk or debris falls out of the flow path and into a basket or screen.
Broadly, downhole tools for clean-up of debris within a well comprise a screen member and a wiper member in sliding engagement with each other to wipe away debris that might be caught in the screen member. The wiper member can be disposed in sliding engagement with the downstream or outer wall surface of the screen member, or in sliding engagement with the upstream or inner wall surface of the screen member. The wiper member also includes one or more window to allow periodic blocking of fluid flow through the screen member during operation of the downhole tools.
In certain specific embodiments, the wiper member includes one or more directional flow ports through one end of the wiper member to facilitate rotation of the wiper member relative to the screen member. In other specific embodiments, the screen member includes one or more directional flow ports through one end of the screen member to facilitate rotation of the screen member relative to the wiper member.
While the invention will be described in connection with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to that embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Referring now to
Screen member 40 comprises upper end 41, lower end 42, upstream or outer wall surface 43, downstream or inner wall surface 44 defining screen bore 45 (
Wiper member 50 comprises upper end 51, lower end 52, upstream or outer wall surface 53, downstream or inner wall surface 54 defining wiper bore 55 (
The term “downstream wall surface” as used herein means the wall surface after the fluid has passed through the screen member or the wiper member and the term “upstream wall surface” as used herein means the wall surface before the fluid has passed through the screen member or the wiper member.
Screen member 40 and wiper member 50 can be formed out of any desired or necessary material to facilitate catching and wiping away debris. In one embodiment, both screen member 40 and wiper member 50 are formed of metal such as steel. In another embodiment, wiper member 50 is formed of a non-metallic material to reduce weight.
Referring now to
Although brush members 70 are shown disposed uniformly over the entire inner wall surface 54, it is to be understood that brush members 70 can be distributed along inner wall surface 54 in any arrangement and can be limited to as few as one brush member 70.
In operation, downhole tool 30 is included as part of a tubing or work string that is then disposed within a wellbore. Conventional fluid circulation down through the work string is utilized to perform a reverse circulating action downhole to collect debris such as metal cuttings and other junk. The circulation of fluid through the work string flows debris upward through downhole tool 30. The fluid passes through apertures 48 into bore 45 of screen member 40. Apertures 48 allow the fluid to pass through screen member 40 (as indicated by arrows 63 (
As shown in the embodiment of
Referring now to
Screen member 140 comprises upper end 141, lower end 142, outer wall surface 143, inner wall surface 144 defining screen bore 145, and a plurality of apertures 148. Although screen member 140 is shown has having a plurality of apertures 148, it is to be understood that screen member 140 can have as few as one aperture 148. Upper end 141 and lower end 142 are closed.
Wiper member 150 comprises upper end 151, lower end 152, outer wall surface 153, inner wall surface 154 defining the wiper bore, and windows 158. Outer wall surface 153, inner wall surface 154, and windows 158 define wiper blades (not shown) in the same manner as described above with respect to wiper member 50. Upper end 151 and lower end 152 are opened so screen member 140 can extend above and below upper end 151 and lower end 152, respectively. Disposed at upper end 151 are directional ports 159. Directional ports 159 facilitate rotation of wiper member 150 so that outer wall surface 143 of screen member 140 is in sliding engagement with inner wall surface 154 of wiper member 150. Directional ports 159 can be in any size, shape, or pattern as long as when fluid is flowing through directional ports 159, wiper member 150 rotates.
In the embodiment of
Chamber 138 is defined by flanges 135, 136 to receive fluid flowing from directional ports 159. Passages 137 permit fluid to flow from chamber 138 through flange 136 and into bore 134 above screen member 140 and wiper member 150.
In operation, fluid flows upward in the same manner as described above with respect to the embodiment of
Referring now to
Wiper member 250 comprises upper end 251, lower end 252, outer wall surface 253, inner wall surface 254 defining the wiper bore, and windows 258. Outer wall surface 253, inner wall surface 254, and windows 258 define wiper blades (not shown) in the same manner as described above with respect to wiper member 50. Upper end 251 and lower end 252 are opened so screen member 240 can extend above and below upper end 251 and lower end 252, respectively.
As shown in
In the embodiment of
In operation, fluid flows upward in the same manner as described above with respect to the embodiment of
It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the exact details of construction, operation, exact materials, or embodiments shown and described, as modifications and equivalents will be apparent to one skilled in the art. For example, in embodiments in which either the screen member or the wiper member is stationary, any device or method known in the art to maintain the screen member or wiper member stationary can be used. In addition, the wiper member can have as few as one window. Alternatively, the wiper member can have three or more windows. Moreover, the apertures in screen member can have any arrangement, size and dimensions as desired or necessary to restrict flow of debris through screen and to allow debris stuck on the screen member to be removed by the wiper member. Further, brush members can be included in any of the embodiments of
In addition, screen member can have a flat geometric shape with the wiper member in sliding engagement with the downstream wall surface of the screen member such that the downstream wall surface is substantially horizontal to a longitudinal axis of the downhole tool. In this embodiment, the wiper can comprise a shaft with an upper end that is operatively associated with a bearing disposed on a flange member and the blades are shape to cause rotation as fluid flows through the aperture(s) of the screen member. The flange member includes one or more passages similar to passages 137 as shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2787327 | Pearson et al. | Apr 1957 | A |
2894725 | Baker | Jul 1959 | A |
3023810 | Anderson | Mar 1962 | A |
3332497 | Page, Jr. | Jul 1967 | A |
3360048 | Watkins | Dec 1967 | A |
3500933 | Burba, Jr. et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
4059155 | Greer | Nov 1977 | A |
4217966 | Garrett | Aug 1980 | A |
4237978 | Calderon et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4276931 | Murray | Jul 1981 | A |
4335788 | Murphey et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4390064 | Enen, Jr. et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4515212 | Krugh | May 1985 | A |
4588243 | Ramsey et al. | May 1986 | A |
4828026 | Nelson | May 1989 | A |
4857175 | Spinnler | Aug 1989 | A |
4880059 | Brandell et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5228518 | Wilson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5425424 | Reinhardt et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5524709 | Withers | Jun 1996 | A |
5533373 | Plester | Jul 1996 | A |
6112812 | Carter | Sep 2000 | A |
6179057 | Fontana et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202752 | Kuck et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6276452 | Davis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6341653 | Firmaniuk et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352129 | Best | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361272 | Bassett | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6397959 | Villarreal | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427776 | Hoffman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446737 | Fontana et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6543538 | Tolman et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6568475 | Grubb et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6607031 | Lynde et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6655459 | Mackay | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6719071 | Moyes | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6755256 | Murley et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6951251 | Penisson | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7069992 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7096975 | Aronstam et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114581 | Aronstam et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7174975 | Krueger et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7267172 | Hofman | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7478687 | Lynde et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7497260 | Telfer | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513303 | Hern | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7610957 | Davis et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7721822 | Krueger et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7753113 | Penisson | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7806203 | Krueger et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7861772 | Blair | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7987901 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8011450 | Krueger et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20010050185 | Calder et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030098181 | Aronstam et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040251033 | Cameron et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20100243258 | Fishbeck et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110024119 | Wolf et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110203848 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120160503 | Davis | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2883658 | Mar 2007 | CN |
2348226 | Sep 2000 | GB |
WO 9922112 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0004269 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0008295 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 03006778 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03025336 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Don M. Hannegan, et al., Technologies Manage Well Pressures, The American Oil & Gas Reporter, Sep. 2001, pp. 87-93, National Publishers Group Inc., U.S.A. |
Anthony Hill and William Furlow, New Tool Addresses ECD Problem, Offshore, Jun. 2002, pp. 88-89, U.S.A., retrieved May 14, 2012, from http://www.pennenergy.com/index/petroleum/display/149477/articles/offshore/volume-62/issue-6/departments/drilling-production/new-tool-addresses-ecd-problem.html, pp. 1-3. |
P.A. Bern, et al., A New Downhole Tool for ECD Reducton, Feb. 19, 2003, pp. 1-4, SPE/IADC 79821, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., U.S.A. |
Sven Krüger, TurboLift Advanced ECD Control, Apr. 2005, pp. 1-13, Baker Hughes Incorporated/INTEQ, U.S.A. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130168091 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |