Kairomone insect trap for capture of corn rootworm

Abstract

A corn rootworm/kairomone insect trap for capturing corn rootworm and other similar insects. A corn rootworm/kairomone trap comprises a capture top dome, a capture reservoir and a container containing a kairomone lure or bait. The trap is useful for corn, peanuts and leafy vegetables crop protection from corn rootworm or other insects.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention concerns a kairomone insect trap for capturing corn rootworm and other similar insects. The trap comprises a capture top dome, a capture reservoir and a container containing a kairomone lure or bait to lure the insects to the trap. The trap is useful for monitoring Diabrotica and other insects in corn, peanuts and leafy vegetables crop protection from corn rootworm.

2. Background of the Invention

Corn rootworm poses a serious economic problems for corn crop. Twenty-one million acres of corn are treated annually in many mid-western states with a soil-applied preventative insecticides for controlling western and/or Northern corn rootworm. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimates that only 30% of these applications are justified against economic loss. Moreover, fewer applications are successful for a variety of reasons ranging from poor application to resistance. Thousand of additional acres of corn, peanuts and leafy vegetables are attacked by two other rootworm species, the Southern and Mexican rootworm.

Iowa State University and the USDA have correlated adult capture rates from yellow glue coated cards to plant counts of adults and these have been correlated to larval root pruning damage in corn. This correlation allows for reduced field monitoring time by consultants or pest control advisors and ultimately results in high accuracy of insect population predictions.

However, due mainly to inconvenience in their use, the yellow glue coated cards have been poorly received and were never adopted in any practical way.

It would therefore be important and advantageous to have available a convenient and practical corn rootworm trap having specific means to attract and capture the insect.

Many methods for prevention of insect infestation and crop destruction of corn, peanuts and leafy vegetables were recently devised. The methods for controlling corn rootworm may include treatments with pathogens, the use of various chemicals and insect growth regulators and recently developed insect sex pheromones and other behavior modifying semiochemicals. Various insect traps have been devised which lure the insects, poison the insects, suffocate the insects and/or remove insects from the stored products using any of the above means.

The current invention provides a corn rootworm trap comprising novel features making it extraordinarily practical and effective.

SUMMARY

One aspect of the current invention concerns a kairomone insect trap for capturing corn rootworm and other similar insects.

Another aspect of the current invention concerns an insect trap comprises a capture top dome, a capture reservoir and a container containing a kairomone lure or bait to lure the insects to the trap.

Another aspect of the invention concerns a trap comprising a kill bait.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a side view of an assembled corn rootworm trap.

FIG. 2 is a upside view of a trap capture top dome.

FIG. 3 is a corn rootworm kairomone lure dispenser, front view (FIG. 3A), side view (FIG. 3B).

FIG. 4 shows results of trap catches of Southern corn rootworm during the season from July to September.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The current invention provides a new type two piece corn rootworm (CRW) trap. The trap comprises a capture top dome, a capture receptacle and a lure or bait to lure the insects to the trap. The lure is typically a kairomone-based attractant. The trap is useful for capturing corn rootworm and similar insects attacking a corn, peanuts and leafy vegetables crop.

Corn rootworm (CRW) trap design features attachments for two types of lures. A kairomone based attractant provides full-season, long-range attraction for CRW adults to the trap surface. The adult corn rootworm land on the trap and find their way up and under the dome cover. As the rootworms enter the area under the dome, they are lured to a full season feeding stimuli mixed with a small amount of insecticide toxicant and are killed within a short time. They then fall into a reservoir which can be removed for counting insects, cleaning the trap and replacing baits if necessary. The clear plastic-based design allows for multiple season use after replacement of lures and allows the user to see insect trapped inside.

The corn rootworm trap features state of the art design characteristics. The design considers insect behavioral preference, such as weather conditions, lure attractiveness, longevity and placement, trap placement, efficiency of data collection, user appeal and production cost.

The trap of the invention allows users detect, monitor emergence and to accurately decide on treating corn rootworm populations based on the number and sex ratio of adults captured in the trap to allow for adult treatment only when necessary versus preventative treatments with soil applied insecticides. The new trap leads to substantial reduction in the annual environmental pesticide load.

Kairomone Corn Rootworm Trap

Kairomone corn rootworm trap and its three major components are shown in FIGS. 1-3.

FIG. 1 shows a two piece corn rootworm trap made of clear polyethylene (PET) or polyvinylchloride (PVC) allowing user to see insects trapped inside.

Trap 50 consists of trap dome or top dome 30 containing a kill bait 4, kill bait insertion slot 9, hanging attachments 10 and 11, retaining stop 6, locking tab 7 for the catch receptacle, reservoir or container 20 which controls size of the opening 8 and serves to lock the two pieces 20 and 30 of the trap 50 together. Trap catch container or capture reservoir 20 shows female part of locking device 7 and a hole 5 allowing insertion of field stake 18. The sides of both parts 20 and 30 are angled to various degree for maximum efficiency of trap entry by rootworm adults or sides of the top dome may be straight. The bottom or capture container 20 easily snaps into the top dome 30 of the trap and can be easily opened for inspection. The Kairomone lure holder is inserted into female insertion of slot 3. Kill bait 4 typically consists of a pill containing a mixture of cucurbitacin feeding stimuli with a carbaryl insecticide bound together by a special formulation of paraffin, such as 60% by volume of paraffin of a melting point above 160 degrees F. Insert hole or slot 5 for insertion of field stake is made from 3/8 inch PVC irrigation pipe to be used as an alternative to the top hanging device for low growing crops. Stop tab 6 for the capture reservoir prevents closing of the circular opening between the two trap pieces 20 and 30. This part insures uniformity of the opening which lowers variation in trap capture. There are several, typically three or four locking tabs 7 insuring attachment of the capture reservoir 20 to the trap top or dome 30. Locking tab extension is smooth in curvature with a depth of under 1/8 inch. Depths over this amount severely reduce capture rate since the insect shows an aversion to crawling over the area. Opening 8 between the trap top or dome 30 and the capture reservoir 20 must be maintained at a uniform distance.

Kill bait insertion hole or slot 9 is tapered to insure a friction fit of the kill bait pill. Top of attachment hanger tap 10 is an integral piece of the teat used internally as the kill bait holder. There is no opening from the inside of the trap to the outside as a result of this. This is an important feature insuring that there is no interference with attraction outside the opening 8. Top hanger insert hole of attachment 11 is for hanging a plastic coated wire hanger or any other hanging or attachment means.

Kairomone lure 40 holder 42 has a laminated seal 12 which seals the Kairomone lure holder. The seal 12 consists of an inner layer of BAREX.TM. plastic and an outer layer of foil. BAREX.TM. 13 is used for the plastic Kairomone lure container. The barex is a necessary nonpermeable barrier extending the shelf life and otherwise protecting the content, that is the lure, from the environmental elements and in reverse, the user from the content of the lure. Plastic wire hanger 15 or other hanging means allows exact placement of trap between tall growing crops like corn or for hanging in fields from stakes.

Kairomone lure container lock-back tap 15 to prevent container from falling out of female insertion slot. Kairomone lure container male insertion tab 16 fitting into female insertion slot. Kairomone lure dispenser 17 is made of high void, highly absorbent polyethylene. The dispenser absorbs a high rate of the active ingredients, release them slowly and protect them from the environment. Alternative suspension means is PVC pipe 18 inserted into the hole 5.

FIG. 2 shows the top dome from the bottom view and shows a locking tabs 7 as well as stop tabs 6. Also seen is the insertion hole 9 for insertion of the kill bait 4 and the female insertion slot 3 for insertion of the kairomone holder and male insertion tab 16.

FIG. 3 shows a kairomone lure holder in the front and side views. Kairomone lure container male insertion tab 16 prevents container from falling out of the female insertion slot.

FIG. 1 illustrates the preferred embodiment of the current invention. Variations of the trap in size, material used or shape are intended to be within a scope of the invention.

The trap is made of light but durable plastic which is preferably transparent to allow the monitor to see how many insects are inside and/or to empty or change the the bottom receptacle section 20. The bottom receptacle is easily removable, emptiable or exchangeable. Thus when the trap becomes too full, the bottom receptacle 20 can be removed and emptied or exchanged. This feature is important particularly for monitoring the number of insects and/or degree of infestation when the receptacle may be, for example, exchanged or checked on a daily, weekly or monthly basis to provide information on whether or not there is an infestation and what the degree of the infestation is. The primary fucntion of the trap is, of course, a capture of the insect to detect and monitor leading elimination of the infestation.

The trap size, material and shape allows the use of the trap anywhere regardless of the environment or weather. It is made of completely non-toxic molded plastic material. There is no known insect which would eat and digest the plastic material. The material is safe to be used even in instances where the trap is placed inside. Moreover, the used plastic is reasonably hard so that it is break-proof and does not deteriorate or disintegrate in humid, dry, hot or cold weather.

Since the various specific kairomones and feeding stimuli may be selected, supplied and or used and exchanged for different insects, the current trap is very versatile, practical and economical.

The feeding stimuli may be any chemical compound or food which will attract the insectsuch as plant or oil-based food attractant, and it may be used alone or it may be a mixture of two or more compounds, for example, it may be a mixture of the food and insecticide. The mixture of both would then be used to attract and kill the insect.

The new trap is more efficient in capturing male and female insects than other existing traps over the full season.

The Kairomone lure is selected from the group of compounds identifed as 1,2,4-trimethoxybenzene, indole, trans-cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, 4-methoxyphenethanol and 4-methoxy cinnamaldehyde alone or in a mixture as seen in Table 1.

TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________CRW LuresTRE Designations 4-MethoxyLure Number Substrate 1,2,4-Trimethoxybenzene Indole trans-Cinnamaldehyde Eugenol 4-Methoxyphenethanol Cinnamaldehyde__________________________________________________________________________TRE 8274 GP-202 H.V. 250 mg 250 mg 250 mg 750 mgTRE 8275 GP-202 H.V. 1500 mgTRE 8276 GP-202 H.V. 500 mg 500 mg 500 mgTRE 8279 GP-202 H.V. 1500 mgTRE 8280 GP-202 H.V. 1500 mgTRE 8281 GP-202 H.V. 1500 mgTRE 8282 GP-202 H.V. 750 mg 750 mgTRE 8291-1 GP-202 H.V. 500 mg 500 mg 500 mgTRE 8291-T GP-202 H.V. 500 mg 500 mg 500 mgTRE 8292 GP-202 H.V. 375 mg 375 mg 375 mg 375 mgTRE 8326 GP-202 H.V. 750 mg 750 mgTRE 8331 GP-202 H.V. 750 mg 750 mgTRE 8336 GP-202 H.V. 500 mg 500 mg 500 mgTRE 8337 GP-202 H.V. 750 mg 375 mg 375 mgTRE 8336 GP-202 H.V. 250 mg 250 mg 250 mgTRE 8339 1/2 GP-202 H.V. 500 mg 500 mg 500 mgTRE 8340 1/2 GP-202 H.V. 250 mg 250 mg 250 mgTRE 8341 GP-203 BRG-100 500 mg 500 mg 500 mgTRG 8342 GP-203 BRG-100 250 mg 250 mg 250 mgTRE 8343 FOAM 500 mg 500 mg 500 mgTRE 8344 FOAM 250 mg 250 mg 250 mgTRE 8345 . . . POLY ROD 500 mg 500 mg 500 mgTRE 8346 POLY ROD 250 mg 250 mg 250 mg__________________________________________________________________________

The effectivity of the CRW trap of the invention has been tested in various conditions and compared to the effectivity of the other types of traps. The results are summarized in enclosed Tables of the actual field trials performed during and off season.

The following examples illustrate testing conditions and results of the trap testing against various insects.

Field Testing of the CRW Kairomone Trap

1. Corn Rootworm Trapping Studies

Corn rootworm trapping studies were conducted on the Texas High Plains in summer 1997. These field tests had three major objectives: (1) compare the timing and numbers of emerging western and Mexican corn rootworm. (2) compare three types of traps for monitoring CRW emergence, and (3) compare two types of the CRW lures aged for different periods of time.

These field evaluations were conducted in five irrigated corn fields in the Northern High Plains of Texas. Fields 1 and 2 were in Parmer County, fields 4 and 5 were in Castro County, and field 3 was in Swisher County. For the bait comparison, only field 1 was used. Each bait type was placed down a row approximately 75 meters apart. The test was replicated five times with each replicate being 25 rows apart.

For evaluation for corn rootworm emergence, sticky traps (FIG. 6), CRW traps (FIG. 6) baited with 8276 lures, and emergence traps (modified pecan weevil traps) were used. The different types of traps were randomized approximately 75 meters down rows of corn. Each treatment was replicated five times, 25 rows apart, at each of the five test fields. The traps were deployed and were serviced weekly except for the last time which was 11 days. At each sampling date, ten plants were sampled per replicate with a "Corn Kiss Sampler". This sampler used a leaf blower to blow 180 mph airstream across the corn plant into a sampling net.

In the bait comparison, the CRW bait 8276 deployed for the length of the test, changed weekly, and aged ten days prior to the start of the test, were all about equal in the effectiveness against both the western and Mexican corn rootworm (Tables 2 and 3). The most effective bait for both types of CRW was the bait 8337, changed weekly.

The results from these studies did not show a significant time difference in the emergence of Mexican and western corn rootworm (Tables 2 and 3). The CRW population in the three county area was 90-95% Western and 5-10% Mexican. The emergence of both types of CRW was somewhat extended since capturing adults began the day the traps were deployed and continued to catch them until were removed. Emerging adult CRW were captured over a 45-period. The extended emergence may have been related to the cool, wet weather which prevailed in the area.

TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________Numbers of Western Corn Rootworm Captured per Observation PeriodAverage number WCR per trap per observation period. July 8 July 15 July 22 July 28 Aug 5 Aug 16 Total__________________________________________________________________________Parmer Co. TX Field 1 Bait TestsEmergence cage 1.8 1.2 2.6 0.4 0.4 2 8.4Sticky trap 31.0 12.8 14.0 12.2 12.8 7.8 90.6Trece crw trap/8276 lure 100.8 10.6 33.6 95.8 121.6 166.6 529Trece crw trap/lure 8276 aged 10 days 62.4 16.2 42.2 129.8 179.8 151.4 581.8Trece crw trap/lure 8276 changed weekly 74.4 18.6 42.2 142.8 206.6 175.8 660.4Trece crw trap/lure 8337 62.4 21.2 44.8 118.4 98.0 114.4 459.2Trece crw trap/lure 8337 changed weekly 88.4 37.4 88.2 288.6 246.4 303.2 1052.2KISS # WCR/plant 0.54 3.0 1.26 0.56 0.08 0.0 5.44Parmer Co. Field 2Emergence cage 0 1.8 2.8 2.2 0.2 0 7Sticky trap 4 12 15.4 28 12.6 0.6 72.6Trece crw trap/8276 lure 0 37.4 96.4 149.8 417.4 15.6 716.6KISS # WCR/plant 0.26 1.48 1.1 1.04 0.04 0 3.92Swisher Co. Field 3Emergence cage 0.8 0.6 0 0 0 0 1.4Sticky trap 4.8 1.2 3.6 2 2.8 1 15.4Trece crw trap/8276 lure 11.6 13.6 46.2 5.2 4.6 4.8 86KISS # WCR/plant 0.26 1.46 0.12 0.22 0.2 0 2.26Castro Co. Field 4Emergence cage 3 5.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 9.2Sticky trap 7.4 37 22 8.4 5.4 0.6 80.8Trece crw trap/8276 lure 17.6 87.75 19 8.4 38 9.8 163KISS # WCR/plant 0.1 0.82 0.26 0.08 0.08 0 1.34Castro Co. Field 5Emergence cage 1 3.2 4.2 2 0.2 0 10.6Sticky trap 2.4 19.4 12 9.8 6.8 9 59.4Trece crw trap/8276 lure 9.2 8.6 12.6 24.8 71 76.4 202.6KISS # WCR/plant 0.26 2.24 0.52 0.68 0.34 0 4.04__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Numbers of Mexican Corn Rootworm Captured per Observation PeriodAverage number MCR per trap per observation period. July 8 July 15 July 22 July 28 Aug 5 Aug 16 Total__________________________________________________________________________Parmer Co. Field 1 Bait TestsEmergence cage 0.4 0 0.8 0 0.4 0.2 1.8Sticky trap 1 0.2 1.4 1 0.6 0.2 4.4Trece crw trap/8276 lure 3.4 1 3.4 4.4 4.2 5.4 21.8Trece crw trap/lure 8276 aged 10 days 4.2 0.8 1.8 5.6 2.8 4.2 19.4Trece crw trap/lure 8276 changed weekly 1.6 0.2 4 7.4 4.4 5 22.6Trece crw trap/lure 8337 6.6 0.6 4 4.2 3 3.8 22.2Trece crw trap/lure 8337 changed weekly 3.4 0.4 22 10 6 9.4 36KISS # WCR/plant 0 0.4 0.16 0 0.04 0 0.56Parmer Co. Field 2Emergence cage 0 0.6 0.4 0 0.2 0 1Sticky trap 0 0 0.2 1.8 0.2 0.4 2.6Trece crw trap/8276 lure 0 7.4 6.8 3.8 5.8 0.6 24.4KISS # WCR/plant 0 0.2 0.1 0.16 0 0 0.46Swisher Co. Field 3Emergence cage 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0.2Sticky trap 0 0.6 0 0.2 0 0 0.8Trece crw trap/8276 lure 0.2 9 4.2 0.2 0.6 0.4 14.6KISS # WCR/plant 0 0.26 0.04 0.06 0 0 0.36Castro Co. Field 4Emergence cage 1.2 0.8 0 0.2 0 0 2.2Sticky trap 1.8 7.6 1.8 1 0.2 0.2 12.6Trece crw trap/8276 lure 1.6 12.25 0.6 1 1.4 0.6 15KISS # WCR/plant 0 0.34 0.06 0.06 0.02 0 0.48Castro Co. Field 5Emergence cage 1.4 0.4 1.4 0.8 0 0 4Sticky trap 0.4 2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 3.6Trece crw trap/8276 lure 2.4 4 2.6 1.4 3.4 3.6 17.4KISS # WCR/plant 0 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.04 0 0.4__________________________________________________________________________ 2. Lure and Trap Comparison

The research results for the lure and trap comparison tests for both the western (w) and southern (s) corn rootworms. These tests were conducted at Scandia, Kans. within the Rootworm Areawide Project's "treated" area, however this field did not reach the treatment threshold. The rootworm populations, both species, were adequate to discern differences.

A. Lure Test for Western Corn Rootworm

In order to compare various lure formulations of corn rootworm (CRW) kairomone for optimum results against western and southern CRW, the field finals were run by the Kansas State University. The trials compared various sticky and non-sticky kairomone based trap designs for efficacy.

Four replicates of eleven different formulations were tested and changed at four week intervals. Traps were observed, counted and emptied at seven day intervals, data recorded and entered. Traps were placed at a density of 60 feet of row. Kill bait was changed only when necessary.

Various trap designs and/or refinements were tested using sticky traps or kairomone type traps. Non-baited dull sticky traps were replicated four times. Kairomone lures were changed twice per season. Traps were observed and counted at seven day intervals.

Treatments with coding: Baited Dull Sticky Trap (BDST) Baited Bright Sticky Trap (BTBS) Clear Top White Bottom Trece Kairomone Trap (CTWB) Clear Top Yellow Bottom Trece Pheromone Trap (CYTB) Clear Top Clear Bottom Trece Pheromone Trap (CTCB) Non-Baited Bright Sticky Trap (NBBS) Sutter Type Old Style Kairomone Trap (SUTT) Alpha=0.05 df=56 MSE=228.0468 Critical Vaulue of T=2.00 Least Significant Difference=16.7 WARNING: Cell sizes are not equal. Harmonic Mean cf cell sizes=6.5625 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N LURE______________________________________A 63.333 6 8391B 33.857 7 8337C 13.000 6 8276C 6.143 7 8326CC 5.286 7 8280CC 4.857 7 8279CC 3.286 7 8336CC 3.000 7 8291-TCC 2.857 7 8347CC 1.857 7 8281CC 0.800 5 8390______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=20 MSE=10321.78 Critical Value of T=2.09 Least Significant Difference=123.23 WARNING: Cell sizes are not equal. Harmonic Mean of cell sizes=5.915493 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N LURE______________________________________ A 265.43 7 8391 AB A 156.71 7 8337B C 125.50 4 8276 C 11.67 6 8336 C C 11.57 7 8326______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=57 MSE=2586.34 Critical Value of T=2.00 Least Significant Difference=59.145 WARNING: Cell sizes are not equal. Harmonic Mean of cell sizes=5.929412 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N LURE______________________________________A 204.29 7 8391B 139.43 7 8337B 112.67 6 8276BB 91.67 3 6282C 11.67 6 8336CC 11.57 7 8326CC 9.33 6 8280CC 8.50 6 8291-TCC 7.43 7 8281CC 6.57 7 8347CC 3.50 6 8390CC 3.29 7 8279______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=38 MSE=2991.499 Critical Value of T=2.02 Least Significant Difference=82.322 WARNING: Cell sizes are not equal. Harmonic Mean of cell sizes=3.61809 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N LURE______________________________________ A 352.67 3 8391 B 113.33 6 8337 BC B 74.00 1 8282C BC B 35.83 6 8347C BC B 31.17 6 8276C 12.60 5 8336CC 11.17 6 8326CC 9.50 4 8291-TCC 8.40 5 8390CC 6.67 6 8280CC 5.00 4 6281CC 2.75 4 8279______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=25 MSE=176.8757 Critical Value of T=2.06 Least Significant Difference=21.75 WARNING: Cell sizes are not equal. Harmonic Mean of cell sizes=3.171806 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N LURE______________________________________A 137.00 4 8391B 66.67 3 8337C 42.00 3 8276C 38.00 3 8282D 13.50 4 8336DD 12.25 4 8326DD 11.50 4 8280DD 10.50 2 8347DD 9.00 4 8291-TDD 5.00 2 8279DD 3.80 5 8281DD 2.00 3 8390______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=56 MSE=208.6729 Critical Value of T=2.00 Least Significant Difference=19.292 WARNING: Cell sizes are not equal. Harmonic Mean of cell sizes=4.5 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N LURE______________________________________ A 54.286 7 8391 AB A 38.167 6 8337B 32.143 7 8276 C 8.143 7 8336 C C 6.143 7 8291-T C C 5.667 6 8347 C C 4.167 6 8326 C C 3.167 6 8280 C C 3.143 7 8390 C C 3.000 1 8282 C C 2.143 7 8281 C C 0.429 7 8279______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=53 MSE=20.65901 Critical Value of T=2.01 Least Significant Difference=6.1799 WARNING: Cell sizes are not equal. Harmonic Mean of cell sizes=4.352332 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N LURE______________________________________A 20.800 5 8391B 12.333 6 8337B 9.429 7 8276C 3.143 7 8347CC 3.000 5 8390CC 2.833 6 8336CC 2.286 7 8291-TCC 1.714 7 8281CC 0.857 7 8326CC 0.714 7 8280CC 0.000 1 8282CC 0.000 6 8279______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=56 MSE=2.616641 Critical Value of T=2.00 Least Significant Difference=2.1642 WARNING: Cell sizes are not equal. Harmonic Mean of cell sizes=4.483986 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N LURE______________________________________ A 4.600 5 8391 AB A 2.571 7 8337B C 1.857 7 6326B CB C 1.429 7 8276B CB C 1.286 7 8291-TB CB C 1.000 1 8282B CB C 0.833 6 8281B CB C 0.571 7 8336B CB C 0.571 7 8280 C C 0.333 6 8390 C C 0.286 7 8347 C C 0.000 7 8279______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=21 MSE=4.082798 Critical Value of T=2.08 Least Significant Difference=29.713 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________Grouping Mean N TRAP______________________________________ A 89.75 4 bdsti= baited dull sticky A A 89.25 4 btbs = baited bright sticky B 56.00 4 ctwb = clear top white bottom B B 53.50 4 ctyb = clear top yellow bottom B B 50.75 4 ctcb = clear top clear bottom BC B 33.00 4 nbbs = nonbaited bright stickyC D 17.25 4 sutt = sutter D D 3.00 4 nbds = nonbaited dull sticky______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=21 MSE=310.6146 Critical Value of T=2.08 Least Significant Difference=25.917 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N TRAP______________________________________ A 75.50 4 btbs AB A 56.25 4 bdstB C 47.75 4 ctcbB CB C 42.75 4 ctwbB CB C 42.25 4 ctybB CB C D 31.25 4 sutt C D C D 29.00 4 nbbs D D 8.00 4 nbds______________________________________

B. B Trap Test

Alpha=0.05 df=5 MSE=120.1714 Critical Value of T=2.57 Least Significant Difference=30.976 WARNING: Cell sizes are not equal. Harmonic Mean of cell sizes=1.655172 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N TRAF______________________________________ A 49.00 1 bdst A A 48.00 1 btbs AB A 33.50 2 ctcbB AB A C 24.00 3 ctybB A CB A C 20.00 2 ctwbB CB C 14.50 2 suttB CB C 5.00 2 nbbs C C 0.00 2 nbds______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=12 MSE=401.5503 Critical Value of T=2.18 Least Significant Difference=37.811 WARNING: Cell sizes are not equal. Harmonic Mean of cell sizes=2.666667 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N TRAP______________________________________ A 62.00 2 btbs AB A 35.50 2 bdstB 21.67 3 ctwbBB 21.33 3 ctcbBB 21.33 3 ctybBB 13.00 3 nbbsBB 6.00 3 suttBB 2.67 3 nbds______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=21 MSE=262.0908 Critical Value of T=2.08 Least Significant Difference=23.806 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N TRAP______________________________________ A 64.75 4 btbs AB A 46.75 4 bdstB C 35.00 4 ctyb CD C 19.75 4 ctcbD CD C 18.25 4 ctwbD CD C 13.25 4 suttDD 6.50 4 nbbsDD 1.50 4 nbds______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=21 MSE=49.91071 Critical Value of T=2.08 Least Significant Difference=10.389 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N TRAP______________________________________ A 16.500 4 btbs AB A 13.000 4 bdstB AB A 11.500 4 ctybB AB A C 7.750 4 ctwbB A CB A C 7.500 4 ctcbB CB C 3.500 4 suttB CB C 2.750 4 nbbs C C 1.000 4 nbds______________________________________ Alpha=0.05 df=20 MSE=10.32381 Critical Value of T=2.09 Least Significant Difference=4.837 WARNING: Cell sizes are not equal. Harmonic Mean of cell sizes=3.84 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. ______________________________________T Grouping Mean N TRAP______________________________________A 4.500 4 btbsA 4.000 4 nbbsAA 2.000 3 ctcbAA 1.500 4 ctybAA 1.250 4 bdstAA 0.750 4 ctwbAA 0.750 4 suttAA 0.000 4 nbds______________________________________ 3. Southern Corn Rootworm Trapping Program

The field testing of trap catching was performed in Gaines County in Texas. Results are seen in FIG. 4 which illustrates Southern corn rootworm trapping from July to September. FIG. 4 shows three adult insect peaks during the tested season, which corresponded well with measured larval activity observed afterwards in the peanuts fields.

______________________________________ Trap Net Ground______________________________________Average No. 15No. Days 7N 6 1 0S 10 0 0E 16 0 0W 11 0 0CP 32 0 0Total 75 1 0Average No. 4.2No. Days 7N 2* 0 0S 0* 0 0E 13 0 0W 3* 0 0CP 3* 0 0Total 21 0 0Average No. .4No. Days 7N 0** 0 0S 0* 0 0E 0* 0 0W 2* 0 0CP 0* 0 0Total 2 0 0Average No. 1.8No. Days 7N 0* 0 0S 6 0 0E 0* 0 0W 0* 0 0CP 3* 0 0Total 9 0 0 *Top off **Trap missing Average No. 63.6No. Days 7N 111 0 0S 17 0 0E 86 0 0W 47 0 0CP 57 0 0Total 318 0 0Average No. 60.1No. Days. 7N 156 0 0S 26 0 0E 54 0 0W 14 0 0CP 56 0 0Total 306 0 0Average No. 65.2No. Days 7N 115 0 0S 53 0 0E 69 0 0W 42 0 0CP 47 1 0Total 326 1 0Average No. 46.6No. Days 7N 28 0 0S 37 0 0E 48 0 0W 83 0 0CP 37 0 0Total 233 0 0Average No. 57No. Days 10N 43 0 0S 54 0 0E 82 0 0W 47 0 0CP 59 0 0Total 285 0 0Average No. 41.2No. Days 10N 44 0 0S 23 0 0E 37 0 0W 49 0 0CP 52 0 0Total 205 0 0Average No. 33No. Days 10N 76 0 0S 37 0 0E 23 0 0W 19 0 0CP 10 0 0Total 165 0 6Average No. 67.3No. Days 10N 57 0 0S 78 0 0E 54 0 0W 120 0 0CP 28 0 0Total 337 0 0Average No. 18.4No. Days 6N 16 0 0S 17 0 0E 27 0 0W 21 0 0CP 11 0 0Total 92 0 0Average No. 5.8No. Days 6N 10 0 0S 1 0 0E 7 0 0W 6 0 0CP 5 0 0Total 29 0 0Average No. 15.4No. Days 6N 34 0 0S 8 0 0E 16 0 0W 9 0 0CP 10 0 0Total 77 0 0Average No. 38No. Days 6N 36 0 0S 42 0 0E 36 0 0W 47 0 0CP 29 0 0Total 190 0 0Average No. 18.8No. Days 6N 9 0 0S 20 0 0E 33 0 0W 19 0 0CP 13 0 0Total 94 0 0Average No. 7No. Days 6N 8 0 0S 3 0 0E 8 0 0W 10 0 0CP 6 0 0Total 35 0 0Average No. 9.6No. Days 6N 26 0 0S 6 0 0E 3 0 0W 2 0 0CP 11 0 0Total 48 0 0Average No. 25.4No. Days 6N 36 0 0S 32 0 0E 13 0 0W 41 0 0CP 5 0 0Total 127 0 0Average No. 10.6No. Days 7N 10 0 0S 11 0 0E 15 1 0W 10 0 0C 7 0 0Total 53 1 0Average No. 6No. Days 7N 5 0 0S 5 0 0E 4 0 0W 3 0 0C 13 1 0Total 30 1 0Average No. 14.8No. Days 7N 36 0 0S 12 0 0E 10 0 0W 4 0 0C 12 0 0Total 74 0 0Average No. 27.4No. Days 7N 31 0 0S 27 0 0E 11 0 0W 47 0 0E 21 0 0Total 137 0 0Average No. 31.6No. Days 7N 24 0 0S 25 0 0E 48 0 0W 36 0 0C 25 0 0Total 158 0 0Average No. 22.5No. Days 7N 15 0 0S 18 0 0E 23 0 0W 22 0 0C 33 0 0Total 111 0 0Average No. 13.6No. Days 7N 23 0 0S 21 0 0E 13 0 0W 9 0 0C 2 0 0Total 68 0 0Average No. 15No. Days 7N 17 0 1S 14 0 0E 15 0 0W 16 0 0C 13 0 0Total 75 0 1Average No. 21No. Days 7N 13 0 0S 17 0 0E 30 0 0W 33 0 0C 22 0 0Total 105 0 0Average No. 16.8No. Days 7N 17 0 0S 10 0 0E 10 0 0W 21 0 0C 26 0 0Total 84 0 0Average No. 16.8No. Days 7N 31 0 0S 21 0 0E 15 0 0W 12 0 0C 5 0 0Total 84 0 0Average No. 18No. Days 7______________________________________ 4. Lure Comparison for Western and Northers Corn Rootworm

This study compares nine different trap designs. Another study compares 12 different lure formulations. Lures were changed weekly and seasonally. The number of captures Western and Northern corn rootworm adults were calculated per trap per testing period.

Trap 1=clear top and bottom Trap 2=clear top and white bottom Trap 3=clear top and yellow bottom Trap 4=Sutter trap Trap 5=Concep trap Trap 6=Pherocon AM with lure Trap 7=Multigard with lure Trap 8=Pherocon AM withot lure Trap 9=Multigard without lute

Results:

There was no statistical difference between various designs, sutter and Concep (modified boll weevil trap) kairomone trap designs. Multigard sticky traps with kairomone lure were more attractive than other designs. But, non-sticky designs demonstrated excellent efficiency for seasonal monitoring of CRW.

Lures most attractive to Western and Northern CRW appeared to be attractive full season.

__________________________________________________________________________Lure Comparison: Lures Changed Weekly - Western and Northern CornRootworm Adults Averaged Per Trap Per Sample Period. Field C1433A.1997 DayLure # 211 218 225 232 239 246 253__________________________________________________________________________1 WCR .female. 12.4 .+-. 6.1 1.7 .+-. 1.7 9.7 .+-. 8.7 14.0 .+-. 6.2 20.2 .+-. 18.2 28.3 .+-. 9.0 76.3 .+-. 16.08276 WCR .male. 82.9 .+-. 35.7 11.3 .+-. 11.3 6.7 .+-. 5.7 5.7 .+-. 1.9 0.8 .+-. 0.8 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 NCR .female. 14.1 .+-. 9.5 0.7 .+-. 0.7 3.3 .+-. 2.0 10.0 .+-. 6.2 7.3 .+-. 5.0 11.3 .+-. 7.7 69.3 .+-. 16.7 NCR .male. 74.2 .+-. 23.4 15.0 .+-. 12.5 8.7 .+-. 6.8 2.3 .+-. 0.9 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 03 WCR .female. 0.7 .+-. 0.7 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.6 1.0 .+-. 0.6 13.0 .+-. 10.6 10.0 .+-. 4.2 14.3 .+-. 5.48326 WCR .male. 13.7 .+-. 2.3 12.7 .+-. 4.8 22.0 .+-. 11.0 2.0 .+-. 1.5 0 0 0 NCR .female. 31.3 .+-. 22.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 3.3 .+-. 0.3 9.7 .+-. 2.9 17.3 .+-. 15.3 80.3 .+-. 25.8 176.0 .+-. 44. NCR .male. 113.7 .+-. 53.8 7.0 .+-. 5.0 10.0 .+-. 0.6 4.0 .+-. 2.6 0 3.3 .+-. 3.3 1.3 .+-. 1.36 WCR .female. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 1.3 .+-. 1.3 0.7 .+-. 0.3 7.0 .+-. 2.0 10.3 .+-. 3.9 16.7 .+-. 9.68280 WCR .male. 7.0 .+-. 2.0 3.0 .+-. 1.7 5.7 .+-. 1.2 0.7 .+-. 0.3 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.7 .+-. 0.3 NCR .female. 16.9 .+-. 14.2 0.3 .+-. 0.3 2.3 .+-. 0.3 6.0 .+-. 1.2 19.7 .+-. 6.1 24.7 .+-. 5.2 73.3 .+-. 24.2 NCR .male. 80.4 .+-. 31.9 0.7 .+-. 0.7 3.7 .+-. 1.2 4.0 .+-. 1.0 0 1.7 .+-. 1.2 07 WCR .female. 0 1.3 .+-. 0.9 2.0 .+-. 1.0 2.7 .+-. 2.1 2.7 .+-. 1.5 1.0 .+-. 0.6 9.3 .+-. 2.38281 WCR .male. 13.0 .+-. 12.5 22.3 .+-. 8.7 12.0 .+-. 9.2 7.0 .+-. 6.0 0 0 0 NCR .female. 1.8 .+-. 1.3 1.7 .+-. 1.2 1.3 .+-. 1.3 2.7 .+-. 1.3 4.3 .+-. 0.9 15.7 .+-. 8.7 85.7 .+-. 41.2 NCR .male. 17.9 .+-. 15.9 6.7 .+-. 3.7 4.7 .+-. 2.4 8.0 .+-. 5.0 0 1.3 .+-. 1.3 08 WCR .female. 0 0 2.1 .+-. 1.7 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.7 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.6 0.7 .+-. 0.78279 WCR .male. 5.0 .+-. 3.0 4.7 .+-. 2.3 56.5 .+-. 8.9 3.3 .+-. 3.3 0 0.7 .+-. 0.7 0 NCR .female. 13.9 .+-. 5.2 2.5 .+-. 1.1 25.9 .+-. 3.4 28.0 .+-. 7.0 87.0 .+-. 18.1 193.1 .+-. 26.9 269.7 .+-. 48. NCR .male. 104.4 .+-. 28.2 35.8 .+-. 16.6 69.8 .+-. 18.0 16.3 .+-. 3.9 0 20.3 .+-. 7.9 011 WCR .female. 1.0 .+-. 0.6 0 1.0 .+-. 0.6 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 0 08390 WCR .male. 6.3 .+-. 4.4 5.3 .+-. 1.9 18.7 .+-. 15.7 3.7 .+-. 2.7 0 0 0 NCR .female. 5.5 .+-. 4.0 0.7 .+-. 0.3 5.1 .+-. 3.2 19.9 .+-. 3.1 39.7 .+-. 15.3 115.2 .+-. 33.7 235.4 .+-. 7.2 NCR .male. 77.5 .+-. 33.4 17.7 .+-. 5.6 41.9 .+-. 16.3 20.1 .+-. 7.1 0.7 .+-. 0.7 6.2 .+-. 4.1 1.6 .+-. 1.612 WCR .female. 12.6 .+-. 8.0 5.8 .+-. 1.4 29.4 .+-. 9.5 38.5 .+-. 10.3 90.9 .+-. 17.3 71.9 .+-. 20.0 84.7 .+-. 21.38391 WCR .male. 205.7 .+-. 25.7 53.5 .+-. 10.4 85.3 .+-. 40.0 23.5 .+-. 3.8 0.4 .+-. 0.4 3.7 .+-. 2.0 0 NCR .female. 11.2 .+-. 6.5 0.3 .+-. 0.3 2.1 .+-. 1.2 8.0 .+-. 6.0 11.3 .+-. 2.3 25.0 .+-. 7.5 91.4 .+-. 32.6 NCR .male. 48.8 .+-. 12.6 13.0 .+-. 4.6 24.6 .+-. 14.6 3.7 .+-. 1.7 0.7 .+-. 0.7 0.7 .+-. 0.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3__________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________Lure Comparison: Lures Changed Weekly - Western and Northern CornRootworm Adults Averaged Per Trap Per Sample Period. Field T411A.1997 DayLure # 212 219 226 233 240 247 254__________________________________________________________________________1 WCR .female. 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.6 2.7 .+-. 0.3 0.7 .+-. 0.3 4.3 .+-. 1.5 7.7 .+-. 3.08276 WCR .male. 0.7 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.6 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.0 1.3 .+-. 1.3 1.3 .+-. 0.3 0 NCR .female. 0 0.7 .+-. 0.3 1.3 .+-. 1.3 3.0 .+-. 2.5 0 5.7 .+-. 2.6 8.7 .+-. 2.4 NCR .male. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.7 .+-. 0.9 1.3 .+-. 0.7 0.3 .+-. 0.3 2.0 .+-. 0.6 1.3 .+-. 0.93 WCR .female. 0 0 1.0 .+-. 1.0 1.3 .+-. 0.3 2.3 .+-. 1.2 2.3 .+-. 1.9 4.3 .+-. 1.38326 WCR .male. 1.0 .+-. 1.0 1.0 .+-. 1.0 3.3 .+-. 1.7 1.0 .+-. 1.0 1.0 .+-. 0.6 2.0 .+-. 1.0 0 NCR .female. 0 1.3 .+-. 0.3 17.5 .+-. 13.6 16.0 .+-. 4.1 16.2 .+-. 3.9 26.7 .+-. 9.3 81.5 .+-. 21.9 NCR .male. 0.7 .+-. 0.3 2.3 .+-. 0.3 24.5 .+-. 14.8 21.0 .+-. 6.6 16.2 .+-. 8.2 16.7 .+-. 13.7 4.5 .+-. 0.36 WCR .female. 0 0 0 0.7 .+-. 0.3 0 2.0 .+-. 2.0 3.0 .+-. 1.28280 WCR .male. 0 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 0 0.7 .+-. 0.3 0 NCR .female. 0 0 3.0 .+-. 1.5 2.7 .+-. 1.2 0.3 .+-. 0.3 2.3 .+-. 1.2 20.3 .+-. 3.4 NCR .male. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 0.7 .+-. 0.3 3.3 .+-. 0.3 1.7 .+-. 1.7 1.7 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.67 WCR .female. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 .+-. 0.78281 WCR .male. 0 0 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 0 0 NCR .female. 0 0 0 1.0 .+-. 0.6 2.0 .+-. 1.5 4.7 .+-. 0.3 31.7 .+-. 11.4 NCR .male. 1.0 .+-. 0.6 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 2.7 .+-. 1.2 1.7 .+-. 0.3 2.0 .+-. 1.5 1.0 .+-. 0.68 WCR .female. 0 0 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 1.3 .+-. 1.3 08279 WCR .male. 0 5.0 .+-. 5.0 5.7 .+-. 5.2 7.0 .+-. 6.0 2.3 .+-. 1.2 0 1.0 .+-. 1.0 NCR .female. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 6.3 .+-. 1.9 15.8 .+-. 4.1 24.1 .+-. 6.3 22.2 .+-. 6.3 68.1 .+-. 23.6 168.8 .+-. 29. NCR .male. 5.7 .+-. 2.0 22.0 .+-. 9.0 50.2 .+-. 22.6 39.6 .+-. 21.6 44.1 .+-. 2.9 28.9 .+-. 12.6 22.0 .+-. 9.9__________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________Lure Comparison: Lures Out All Summer - Western and Northern CornRootworm Adults Averaged Per Trap Per Sample Period. Field T411A.1997 DayLure # 212 219 226 233 240 247 254__________________________________________________________________________1 WCR .female. 0 0 5.5 .+-. 4.8 1.0 .+-. 0.4 1.8 .+-. 0.9 4.8 .+-. 2.8 9.8 .+-. 2.58276 WCR .male. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 1.3 .+-. 0.9 2.0 .+-. 1.4 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.3 .+-. 0.9 0.3 .+-. 0.3 NCR .female. 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 6.8 .+-. 5.8 3.0 .+-. 1.4 1.3 .+-. 0.9 6.3 .+-. 3.7 11.0 .+-. 3.2 NCR .male. 3.0 .+-. 1.8 1.5 .+-. 0.6 2.0 .+-. 0.9 7.8 .+-. 3.9 1.8 .+-. 1.0 6.0 .+-. 4.7 0.8 .+-. 0.52 WCR .female. 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 .+-. 0.5 1.8 .+-. 0.58291T WCR .male. 0.5 .+-. 0.3 0.8 .+-. 0.5 1.8 .+-. 1.8 0.5 .+-. 0.3 0.5 .+-. 0.5 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 NCR .female. 0.5 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.6 3.3 .+-. 1.5 5.5 .+-. 1.8 5.5 .+-. 1.8 4.3 .+-. 2.4 82.9 .+-. 17.9 NCR .male. 2.0 .+-. 0.8 3.3 .+-. 1.8 11.8 .+-. 8.8 8.8 .+-. 4.6 8.8 .+-. 4.6 5.0 .+-. 3.7 14.4 .+-. 8.23 WCR .female. 0 0 2.3 .+-. 1.9 1.3 .+-. 0.9 0 1.8 .+-. 0.8 1.8 .+-. 0.68326 WCR .male. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.3 .+-. 0.8 1.0 .+-. 0.7 7.3 .+-. 4.5 0.5 .+-. 0.5 0.5 .+-. 0.5 0 NCR .female. 0 2.8 .+-. v1.5 15.2 .+-. 12.2 18.2 .+-. 8.7 8.0 .+-. 2.4 42.0 .+-. 15.5 103.0 .+-. 37.7 NCR .male. 1.0 .+-. 0.7 6.8 .+-. 4.3 2.6 .+-. 1.9 21.1 .+-. 10.1 7.0 .+-. 2.4 3.0 .+-. 0.8 3.0 .+-. 4.44 WCR .female. 0 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.8 .+-. 0.5 5.5 .+-. 3.38336 WCR .male. 0 0 0.5 .+-. 0.5 0 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 NCR .female. 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 8.5 .+-. 7.8 5.2 .+-. 2.5 2.0 .+-. 1.1 13.5 .+-. 7.1 41.6 .+-. 14.4 NCR .male. 0.8 .+-. 0.5 0.3 .+-. 0.3 4.8 .+-. 3.8 4.8 .+-. 3.1 2.0 .+-. 1.4 1.3 .+-. 0.5 5.6 .+-. 2.65 WCR .female. 0 0.8 .+-. 0.3 1.3 .+-. 0.5 3.0 .+-. 1.1 0.8 .+-. 0.5 6.5 .+-. 2.3 24.3 .+-. 3.68337 WCR .male. 1.5 .+-. 0.5 4.0 .+-. 2.4 3.3 .+-. 1.7 6.5 .+-. 3.0 16.5 .+-. 7.0 1.8 .+-. 1.4 1.8 .+-. 0.5 NCR .female. 0 4.0 .+-. 1.3 6.0 .+-. 3.7 12.3 .+-. 6.6 16.3 .+-. 6.0 49.7 .+-. 15.0 105.3 .+-. 19.0 NCR .male. 2.3 .+-. 0.9 14.0 .+-. 7.2 11.8 .+-. 4.7 23.4 .+-. 13.1 15.0 .+-. 9.4 7.1 .+-. 3.5 7.2 .+-. 4.111 WCR .female. 0 0 1.0 .+-. 1.0 1.0 .+-. 0.6 3.3 .+-. 3.3 0 13.0 .+-. 13.08390 WCR .male. 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 3.0 .+-. 1.5 17.0 .+-. 2.0 3.7 .+-. 1.5 1.0 .+-. 1.0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 NCR .female. 0 1.7 .+-. 0.3 25.8 .+-. 19.5 32.8 .+-. 4.9 25.7 .+-. 2.3 63.8 .+-. 15.5 83.0 .+-. 58.0 NCR .male. 1.7 .+-. 1.2 3.7 .+-. 1.5 30.2 .+-. 6.8 39.9 .+-. 7.0 59.7 .+-. 20.1 38.2 .+-. 19.8 11.0 .+-. 10.512 WCR .female. 0 1.7 .+-. 0.3 2.7 .+-. 0.7 6.3 .+-. 1.3 1.7 .+-. 1.7 10.7 .+-. 3.5 19.3 .+-. 4.68276 WCR .male. 0.7 .+-. 0.7 2.0 .+-. 1.2 2.3 .+-. 1.2 11.0 .+-. 1.5 12.3 .+-. 3.5 3.7 .+-. 1.3 1.7 .+-. 1.7 NCR .female. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.7 .+-. 0.7 3.7 .+-. 0.9 14.7 .+-. 2.4 4.3 .+-. 3.0 12.3 .+-. 2.0 32.3 .+-. 6.5 NCR .male. 0 1.3 .+-. 0.7 9.3 .+-. 6.4 37.3 .+-. 14.3 13.3 .+-. 7.9 6.7 .+-. 3.7 2.0 .+-. 0.66 WCR .female. 0 0 1.5 .+-. 1.5 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.8 .+-. 0.5 0.5 .+-. 0.5 2.5 .+-. 1.08280 WCR .male. 0 0 4.0 .+-. 3.7 1.0 .+-. 1.0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 NCR .female. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 6.2 .+-. 3.5 1.8 .+-. 1.2 2.3 .+-. 0.9 3.0 .+-. 1.2 21.8 .+-. 7.1 NCR .male. 2.3 .+-. 1.4 1.0 .+-. 0.4 21.3 .+-. 19.6 5.3 .+-. 3.5 1.0 .+-. 0.4 1.0 .+-. 0.7 2.5 .+-. 1.67 WCR .female. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 .+-. 0.58281 WCR .male. 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 0 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 NCR .female. 0 0 1.3 .+-. 0.8 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.7 4.0 .+-. 0.7 16.0 .+-. 3.5 NCR .male. 0.5 .+-. 0.3 0.8 .+-. 0.5 4.0 .+-. 3.4 0.5 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.4 2.3 .+-. 0.6 4.0 .+-. 3.38 WCR .female. 0 0 5.3 .+-. 5.3 1.8 .+-. 0.5 0 0.8 .+-. 0.8 0.3 .+-. 0.38279 WCR .male. 0 5.0 .+-. 3.1 9.8 .+-. 4.1 24.5 .+-. 4.6 7.0 .+-. 4.5 0 0 NCR .female. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 6.6 .+-. 2.3 27.8 .+-. 9.7 46.4 .+-. 12.3 60.8 .+-. 15.5 190.0 .+-. 32.5 296.4 .+-. 38. NCR .male. 4.5 .+-. 2.4 31.9 .+-. 12.7 55.5 .+-. 30.4 61.9 .+-. 7.9 59.2 .+-. 23.2 33.5 .+-. 16.4 25.6 .+-. 6.69 WCR .female. 0 0 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 1.3 .+-. 0.8 1.3 .+-. 0.58347 WCR .male. 0 0 2.5 .+-. 1.9 7.0 .+-. 2.9 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 NCR .female. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.8 .+-. 0.3 3.1 .+-. 0.9 15.0 .+-. 4.8 16.5 .+-. 3.5 59.2 .+-. 13.7 97.9 .+-. 17.2 NCR .male. 1.0 .+-. 0.4 5.5 .+-. 3.9 22.7 .+-. 13.2 34.5 .+-. 11.6 12.0 .+-. 1.5 6.6 .+-. 2.8 13.1 .+-. 4.110 WCR .female. 0 0 1.8 .+-. 0.9 5.8 .+-. 2.3 0.8 .+-. 0.5 4.8 .+-. 1.4 30.0 .+-. 12.28282 WCR .male. 1.3 .+-. 0.8 0.8 .+-. 0.3 3.0 .+-. 2.7 12.0 .+-. 5.2 7.5 .+-. 2.9 0.8 .+-. 0.3 1.8 .+-. 0.9 NCR .female. 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.4 6.6 .+-. 3.3 2.0 .+-. 0.4 2.0 .+-. 0.7 15.0 .+-. 1.8 NCR .male. 1.3 .+-. 1.3 1.3 .+-. 0.9 10.8 .+-. 9.4 23.9 .+-. 12.0 2.8 .+-. 1.5 2.0 .+-. 0.9 0.8 .+-. 0.511 WCR .female. 0 0 1.8 .+-. 1.4 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.5 .+-. 0.58390 WCR .male. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 5.5 .+-. 3.2 4.5 .+-. 3.2 8.8 .+-. 4.7 3.8 .+-. 3.8 0.5 .+-. 0.5 0 NCR .female. 0 4.8 .+-. 1.9 15.9 .+-. 12.5 15.6 .+-. 5.8 24.9 .+-. 4.6 63.7 .+-. 8.8 132.8 .+-. 16.7 NCR .male. 1.5 .+-. 0.3 7.5 .+-. 2.2 21.4 .+-. 12.3 27.2 .+-. 6.5 28.1 .+-. 7.6 14.5 .+-. 7.3 16.0 .+-. 7.012 WCR .female. 0 0.5 .+-. 0.5 3.8 .+-. 2.3 6.3 .+-. 1.9 9.0 .+-. 5.5 18.5 .+-. 3.1 43.6 .+-. 11.48391 WCR .male. 3.8 .+-. 1.0 4.8 .+-. 4.1 5.5 .+-. 1.8 9.0 .+-. 3.2 10.0 .+-. 3.1 3.3 .+-. 2.0 2.1 .+-. 0.7 NCR .female. 0 1.3 .+-. 1.3 4.0 .+-. 1.6 5.0 .+-. 0.7 4.0 .+-. 0.0 20.3 .+-. 4.9 29.5 .+-. 4.9 NCR .male. 1.0 .+-. 0.4 2.0 .+-. 1.7 10.3 .+-. 8.3 7.5 .+-. 2.7 10.0 .+-. 5.3 3.5 .+-. 2.9 1.8 .+-. 1.1__________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________Lure Comparison: Lures Out All Summer - Western and Northern CornRootworm Adults Averaged Per Trap Per Sample Period. Field C1433A.1997 DayLure # 211 218 225 232 239 246 253__________________________________________________________________________1 WCR .female. 4.5 .+-. 1.6 2.9 .+-. 0.9 5.5 .+-. 2.8 7.5 .+-. 3.1 15.3 .+-. 5.8 9.5 .+-. 2.9 37.8 .+-. 6.28276 WCR .male. 65.5 .+-. 17.1 21.6 .+-. 17.3 12.5 .+-. 4.3 11.5 .+-. 5.4 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.8 .+-. 0.5 NCR .female. 6.2 .+-. 1.3 0.5 .+-. 0.3 0.5 .+-. 0.5 2.8 .+-. 1.0 3.5 .+-. 1.2 6.3 .+-. 2.5 14.8 .+-. 1.9 NCR .male. 56.8 .+-. 20.3 9.5 .+-. 7.5 8.8 .+-. 3.3 5.5 .+-. 3.9 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.5 .+-. 0.9 1.0 .+-. 0.42 WCR .female. 1.0 .+-. 0.7 0.5 .+-. 0.5 1.8 .+-. 0.9 0.8 .+-. 0.5 1.3 .+-. 0.5 4.0 .+-. 1.0 2.5 .+-. 1.28291T WCR .male. 30.0 .+-. 4.3 8.8 .+-. 3.8 8.8 .+-. 3.8 2.5 .+-. 2.2 0 0.5 .+-. 0.5 0.3 .+-. 0.3 NCR .female. 18.8 .+-. 6.4 0.5 .+-. 0.3 4.8 .+-. 2.6 8.0 .+-. 2.4 29.8 .+-. 6.6 37.1 .+-. 4.1 100.0 .+-. 13.6 NCR .male. 72.2 .+-. 11.2 5.0 .+-. 2.5 14.5 .+-. 5.7 3.8 .+-. 0.6 0.3 .+-. 0.3 6.2 .+-. 3.2 0.8 .+-. 0.53 WCR .female. 2.0 .+-. 1.7 0.5 .+-. 0.5 0.5 .+-. 0.3 0.8 .+-. 0.8 4.8 .+-. 1.9 6.8 .+-. 2.0 9.0 .+-. 2.68326 WCR .male. 19.0 .+-. 5.8 10.0 .+-. 1.7 17.5 .+-. 6.1 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 NCR .female. 20.1 .+-. 3.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.8 .+-. 0.9 7.5 .+-. 1.4 33.3 .+-. 2.9 45.8 .+-. 18.4 87.8 .+-. 23.6 NCR .male. 80.1 .+-. 14.0 4.3 .+-. 1.3 12.3 .+-. 6.8 4.0 .+-. 2.2 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.74 WCR .female. 1.8 .+-. 0.9 0.3 .+-. 0.3 4.7 .+-. 2.9 1.3 .+-. 0.8 3.3 .+-. 2.0 4.3 .+-. 2.6 18.5 .+-. 12.98336 WCR .male. 15.8 .+-. 8.5 3.8 .+-. 1.7 16.9 .+-. 10.6 1.3 .+-. 1.3 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 NCR .female. 11.6 .+-. 7.3 0 2.3 .+-. 1.1 1.3 .+-. 0.6 9.5 .+-. 2.1 17.5 .+-. 6.8 56.2 .+-. 13.7 NCR .male. 55.1 .+-. 33.3 3.8 .+-. 2.1 9.3 .+-. 4.1 1.0 .+-. 0.0 0 0.8 .+-. 0.5 0.9 .+-. 0.95 WCR .female. 6.8 .+-. 2.9 2.7 .+-. 0.9 9.8 .+-. 3.5 8.8 .+-. 4.2 53.5 .+-. 7.7 34.7 .+-. 5.5 36.5 .+-. 13.98337 WCR .male. 86.7 .+-. 31.6 34.8 .+-. 11.7 67.2 .+-. 27.4 10.5 .+-. 4.9 0 0.5 .+-. 0.3 0 NCR .female. 7.5 .+-. 3.5 1.0 .+-. 0.6 4.5 .+-. 2.4 3.3 .+-. 2.1 12.8 .+-. 1.4 20.8 .+-. 4.9 46.5 .+-. 17.36 WCR .female. 0.5 .+-. 0.5 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.5 .+-. 0.9 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.3 .+-. 0.3 2.3 .+-. 0.5 2.5 .+-. 1.38280 WCR .male. 15.0 .+-. 7.5 10.3 .+-. 5.8 6.3 .+-. 3.4 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 0 0 NCR .female. 12.3 .+-. 8.2 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.8 .+-. 0.5 0.5 .+-. 0.5 3.3 .+-. 0.5 3.8 .+-. 1.9 15.3 .+-. 4.0 NCR .male. 64.0 .+-. 24.1 4.5 .+-. 2.3 3.5 .+-. 1.4 0.8 .+-. 0.3 0 0.8 .+-. 0.5 07 WCR .female. 2.6 .+-. 1.2 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.5 .+-. 0.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.7 2.8 .+-. 1.58281 WCR .male. 20.7 .+-. 10.2 19.3 .+-. 6.8 12.3 .+-. 7.9 1.0 .+-. 0.7 0 0 0 NCR .female. 3.2 .+-. 0.7 2.0 .+-. 0.7 0.5 .+-. 0.5 0.3 .+-. 0.3 3.5 .+-. 0.6 9.3 .+-. 3.7 83.5 .+-. 37.9 NCR .male. 32.1 .+-. 11.3 8.3 .+-. 5.4 8.8 .+-. 7.2 1.3 .+-. 0.6 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.3 .+-. 0.9 2.3 .+-. 1.38 WCR .female. 2.0 .+-. 1.1 1.0 .+-. 0.4 3.5 .+-. 2.0 0 0 0 0.3 .+-. 0.38279 WCR .male. 22.5 .+-. 9.9 17.8 .+-. 7.3 28.5 .+-. 10.1 2.5 .+-. 1.3 0 0 0 NCR .female. 6.6 .+-. 1.8 2.8 .+-. 1.9 10.6 .+-. 3.8 35.5 .+-. 11.5 79.8 .+-. 36.6 127.5 .+-. 38.2 153.0 .+-. 41.9 NCR .male. 66.4 .+-. 13.0 24.2 .+-. 9.4 43.7 .+-. 13.5 19.7 .+-. 8.0 0 14.3 .+-. 6.5 2.2 .+-. 1.39 WCR .female. 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 1.0 .+-. 0.7 0.5 .+-. 0.3 1.0 .+-. 0.6 14.5 .+-. 9.6 2.0 .+-. 1.28347 WCR .male. 12.3 .+-. 2.7 4.0 .+-. 1.5 8.3 .+-. 5.4 0.8 .+-. 0.5 0 0.3 .+-. 0.3 0 NCR .female. 18.3 .+-. 5.2 0.8 .+-. 0.5 2.8 .+-. 1.3 13.3 .+-. 4.5 31.5 .+-. 6.9 53.5 .+-. 17.4 144.6 .+-. 23.7 NCR .male. 64.2 .+-. 13.0 3.0 .+-. 1.7 13.8 .+-. 8.8 6.8 .+-. 2.6 0.5 .+-. 0.5 7.0 .+-. 3.7 6.4 .+-. 4.110 WCR .female. 37.0 .+-. 24.3 1.5 .+-. 0.6 18.0 .+-. 12.5 26.6 .+-. 10.0 50.3 .+-. 12.9 61.6 .+-. 35.0 55.6 .+-. 3.38282 WCR .male. 155.5 .+-. 50.5 24.8 .+-. 1.7 45.2 .+-. 9.4 11.6 .+-. 3.2 0 3.6 .+-. 0.6 1.6 .+-. 1.0 NCR .female. 6.4 .+-. 5.1 0.8 .+-. 0.5 2.5 .+-. 1.3 1.5 .+-. 0.9 1.5 .+-. 0.6 13.8 .+-. 9.1 18.0 .+-. 0.8 NCR .male. 27.4 .+-. 11.5 2.5 .+-. 1.3 18.0 .+-. 5.6 4.8 .+-. 2.1 0 1.3 .+-. 0.9 1.0 .+-. 0.611 WCR .female. 0.5 .+-. 0.5 1.0 .+-. 1.0 2.0 .+-. 1.7 0.3 .+-. 0.3 1.3 .+-. 0.5 2.0 .+-. 0.9 3.5 .+-. 1.28390 WCR .male. 15.7 .+-. 11.5 6.5 .+-. 2.7 31.5 .+-. 26.2 1.3 .+-. 0.8 0 0 0.5 .+-. 0.5 NCR .female. 12.7 .+-. 5.1 0.5 .+-. 0.5 3.3 .+-. 2.6 7.8 .+-. 2.7 38.3 .+-. 14.9 87.1 .+-. 16.0 171.6 .+-. 13. NCR .male. 50.1 .+-. 18.1 5.0 .+-. 1.8 13.3 .+-. 8.4 5.0 .+-. 1.7 0 3.2 .+-. 1.3 1.7 .+-. 1.012 WCR .female. 23.8 .+-. 10.1 9.4 .+-. 2.9 17.5 .+-. 5.7 29.0 .+-. 4.0 93.0 .+-. 12.9 93.0 .+-. 15.2 106.7 .+-. 28391 WCR .male. 153.7 .+-. 38.6 71.6 .+-. 18.6 52.6 .+-. 11.9 12.3 .+-. 3.6 0 3.5 .+-. 0.5 1.5 .+-. 0.9 NCR .female. 6.9 .+-. 4.4 1.3 .+-. 0.3 1.8 .+-. 0.3 5.5 .+-. 1.8 8.0 .+-. 1.1 21.3 .+-. 4.0 52.5 .+-. 5 NCR .male. 21.8 .+-. 8.4 4.0 .+-. 1.8 11.0 .+-. 2.4 2.5 .+-. 0.9 0.3 .+-. 0.3 3.3 .+-. 1.3 0.3 .+-. 0__________________________________________________________________________

Claims

1. An insect trap suitable for capture of corn rootworm flying insect pest comprising:

(a) a capture top dome containing a bait in a bait holder positioned in the center of the top dome;

(b) a capture reservoir comprising

(i) one or more locking devices enabling attachment of the capture reservoir to the capture top dome;

(ii) a circular groove positioned in the center of the bottom of the capture reservoir allowing emplacement of the trap on a field stake;

(c) a kairomone lure dispenser attached to the capture top dome.

2. The trap of claim 1 additionally comprising hanging attachment.

3. The trap of claim 2 wherein the top dome and the capture reservoir are made of polyethylene or polyvinylchloride.

4. The trap of claim 3 wherein the hanging attachment is a hanger tap integrally connected with the bait holder.

5. The trap of claim 4 wherein the hanger tap has an insert opening for attachment of a hanger.

6. The trap of claim 5 wherein the hanger is a plastic coated wire hanger.

7. The trap of claim 6 wherein the locking device is a locking tab.

8. The trap of claim 7 wherein the kairomone lure dispenser comprises a seal consisting of an inner layer of plastic and an outer layer of foil.

9. The trap of claim 8 wherein the kairomone lure dispenser is connected with the top dome through a side slot.

10. The trap of claim 9 wherein the lure is a kairomone-based attractant.

11. The trap of claim 10 wherein the kairomone lure is selected from the group consisting of 1, 2, 4-trimethoxybenzene, indole, transcimamaldehyde, eugenol, 4-methoxyphenethanol and 4-methoxycinnamaldehyde or a mixture thereof.

12. The trap of claim 11 wherein the bait is a kill bait.

13. The trap of claim 12 wherein the kill bait consists of a pill containing a feeding stimulating compound and an insecticide.

14. The trap of claim 13 wherein the feeding stimulating compound is cucurbitacin and insecticide is carbaryl.