The present invention relates generally to key duplicating machines, and particularly to a key duplicating machine with the capability of restricting duplication of an original key.
When making a duplicate key, it is generally necessary to have the original key present at the time of duplication. The original key is generally held in a key duplicating machine that copies the key cuts from the original key to a copy of the key.
Key duplicating machines are known that do not require the original key to be present during the copying process. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,687,565 to Wetterlin et al. describes a key identification code and manufacturing method. After making measurements of a key, the measurements are converted into a compact format which can be read back at a later date or at a different location by apparatus capable of accurately reproducing the original key. The data may be stored on, for example, a sticker, paper strip, or magnetic swipe card. When the duplicate key is required, the data are read from the storage medium and transmitted to a suitable key duplication device to produce a reproduction key.
The present invention seeks to provide a key duplicating machine with the capability of restricting duplication of an original key, as is described more in detail hereinbelow. The machine may have a multiplicity of interfaces for inputting key duplication data.
There is thus provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a method for duplicating a key including receiving a key identification code indicative of key cuts in an original key, and duplicating the original key by forming key cuts in a duplicate key in response to the key identification code, wherein authorization to form the key cuts is restricted by means of a verification code that must be passed before forming the key cuts is permissible. The authorization to form the key cuts may be restricted in various ways, such as to a group of users, a geographic location of a user, or a group of key blanks. The authorization to form the key cuts may be restricted as a function of a physical characteristic of the original key. As another alternative, authorization to form the key cuts may be restricted as a function of whether the original key is a master key or a slave key.
In another embodiment of the invention, the method may further include storing in memory how many times the original key was duplicated. Authorization to form the key cuts may include retrieving from memory how many times the original key was duplicated and restricting duplication of the original key as a function of how many times the original key was duplicated.
There is also provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a machine for duplicating a key including an interface for inputting a key identification code indicative of key cuts in an original key, a processor in communication with the interface for receiving and processing the key identification code, and key-cut forming apparatus for forming key cuts in a duplicate key in response to the key identification code, wherein the processor is adapted to restrict authorization to form the key cuts by means of a verification code that must be passed before forming the key cuts is permissible.
A user-portable device may be provided that has the key identification code stored therein, wherein the interface is capable of transmitting the key identification code from the user-portable device to the processor. The interface may include a keyboard for inputting the key identification code.
Reference is now made to
Key duplicating machine 10 may include a housing 12 with an interface 14 for inputting a key identification code indicative of key cuts in an original key. The key identification code may be stored in a user-portable device 16 (
The key identification code may be recorded on the user-portable device 16 by the key/lock manufacturer, and may include information about the depth of the key cuts that define the key combination (such as to lift pins to a shear line in cylinder lock), as well as other information regarding a physical characteristic of the key, such as but not limited to, the configuration of the keyway profile.
Key duplicating machine 10 may further include another interface 14A, such as a keyboard, that permits entering a key identification code of a key for which no user-portable device 16 has been manufactured. Thus, key duplicating machine 10 may have a multiplicity of interfaces for inputting key duplication data to cover any kind of key and is backward compatible with older keys. A display 15 may be provided for displaying the input code.
Key duplicating machine 10 may further include other interfaces 14B, such as a USB port or a LAN or high speed Internet connection, etc. Such interfaces may be used to download or upload the key identification code from/to another computer, remote server, Internet site, etc.
Key duplicating machine 10 may include a processor 18 (e.g., a microprocessor chip) in communication with interface 14 for receiving and processing the key identification code. Key duplicating machine 10 may further include key-cut forming apparatus 20 for forming key cuts in a duplicate key in response to the key identification code. A cover 22 may be used to cover access to key-cut forming apparatus 20. The key-cut forming apparatus 20 may be any suitable apparatus for machining or otherwise forming key cuts (e.g., singular, telescoping, etc.) and is well known to persons skilled in the art and does not require further description for them. An example of such apparatus is found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,602,030, assigned to Mul-T-Lock Technologies Ltd., which describes key-cut forming apparatus including two rotatable machining heads powered by a motor for forming key cuts on a key blank. A key blank clamping assembly securely and removably mounts a key blank during engagement thereof with the machining heads. A key blank translation assembly selectively positions the key blank clamping assembly such that a key blank mounted thereon is brought into desired engagement with the machining heads. The invention is not limited to this type of key-cut forming apparatus and the invention may be carried out with other kinds of key-cut forming apparatus, such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,687,565 mentioned above.
As another option, the key-cut forming apparatus 20 may include machining heads capable of not only forming key cuts but also of identification marks on the key (e.g., letters, numerals or other characters).
It is further noted that processor 18 may be remote from key duplicating machine 10. For example, the processing may be done by some server connected to machine 10, such as by Internet connection.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the processor 18 is adapted to restrict authorization to form the key cuts by means of a verification code that must be passed before forming the key cuts is permissible. For example, processor 18 may be pre-programmed with the verification code by the manufacturer (and the end user may be given permission and authorization to modify the verification code). As another example, the verification code may be included in the key identification code.
Reference is now made to
A key identification code indicative of key cuts in an original key is received (input) in step 201 (such as by swiping a magnetic swipe card in interface 14 or by inputting the code in the keyboard or by any other suitable way of inputting data, as described above). The processor 18 may check the verification code to determine whether authorization to form the key cuts is granted (202).
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, authorization to form the key cuts may be restricted to a group of users (203). For example, authorization may be restricted to a group of employees at a place of work, a group of teachers at a school, law enforcement agents, etc.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, authorization to form the key cuts may be restricted to a geographic location of a user (204). For example, a manufacturer may wish to restrict sales or use of certain models of locks/keys to a marketing region (e.g., western Canada, Southeast Asia, etc.) and may use the verification code to restrict duplication of keys to these areas only.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, authorization to form the key cuts may be restricted to a group of key blanks (205), e.g., only Chevrolet model key blanks. In accordance with yet another embodiment of the invention, authorization to form the key cuts may be restricted as a function of a physical characteristic of the original key (206). For example, a manufacturer may wish to restrict duplication to a certain range of key profiles.
In another example, authorization to form the key cuts may be restricted as a function of whether the original key is a master key or a slave key (207).
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the number of times the original key was duplicated may be stored in memory (208). The processor 18 may retrieve from memory how many times the original key was duplicated (209), and then provide authorization to duplicate the key as a function of how many times the original key was duplicated (210). This feature may be used to limit the number of permissible copies of the original key, for example.
Once authorization has been provided, the original key may be duplicated by forming key cuts in a duplicate key in response to the key identification code (211).
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, key duplicating machine 10 may comprise different key forming modules (e.g., key-cutting apparatus for cutting different kinds of key cuts, such as telescopic key cuts and non-telescopic key cuts, or apparatus for cutting keyways and key profiles) and authorization to operate key duplicating machine 10 may be restricted to only certain modules (a subset of the key forming modules) (212). In this manner, the manufacturer of key duplicating machine 10 can control which locksmiths or other users are authorized to perform certain key-cutting operations, and can charge money for enabling the use of additional modules or upgrading to other modules.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof that are not in the prior art, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
173803 | Feb 2006 | IL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2007/000171 | 2/7/2007 | WO | 00 | 8/14/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/093982 | 8/23/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5676504 | Mueller et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5711643 | Parr et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
6602030 | Markbreit | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6687565 | Wetterlin et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7070369 | Jalove et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077607 | Foscan | Jul 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10031713 | Jan 2002 | DE |
10031713 | Jan 2002 | DE |
0779120 | Jun 1997 | EP |
1270851 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1339024 | Aug 2003 | EP |
2340644 | Feb 2000 | GB |
2002147075 | May 2002 | JP |
9906179 | Feb 1999 | WO |
2005080717 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006032354 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006102109 | Sep 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EPO Machine Translation—Bosch, Karl-Heinz (2002). DE 10031713 A1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090074528 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |