Patent Application
20060109080
The present invention relates to remote keyless entry systems for vehicles, and in particular to selective deactivation of functions on a key fob of a remote keyless entry system.
Remote keyless entry (RKE) systems for vehicles enjoy wide use today, with RKE systems adding additional functions over and above the more conventional lock/unlock, trunk release and alarm functions. Such functions may include, for example, power door open/close and remote engine start. Typically, the conventional key fob transmits a vehicle function request whenever a button is pressed, whether inadvertent or not. For some, a RKE function being performed when a button is inadvertently pressed is a significant annoyance. For example, when a key fob is in ones pocket or purse, an alarm or trunk release button may be inadvertently pressed, causing the key fob to transmit the requested vehicle function even if not desired by the one carrying the key fob. One may then have to pull out the key fob and press the button again or go over to the vehicle to counteract the inadvertent vehicle function performed.
Thus, it is desirable to provide a means for deactivating a key fob when it is likely that a press of a button thereon is inadvertent.
In its embodiments, the present invention contemplates a key fob for use in a remote keyless entry system of a vehicle. The key fob may include a power source, a user operable button indicative of a remote keyless entry function associated with the vehicle, a tilt sensor capable of detecting a tilt angle of the key fob relative to horizontal, and a transmitter operable to transmit a signal indicative of the remote keyless entry function. The key fob may also include a fob controller operatively engaging the power source, the user operable button, the transmitter, and the tilt sensor, with the controller operative to prevent transmission of the signal indicative of the remote keyless entry function when the tilt sensor detects that the tilt angle is not within a predetermined acceptable range of angles from the horizontal.
The present invention also contemplates a method of operating a key fob adapted to be employed in a remote keyless entry system of a vehicle. The method may comprise the steps of: detecting an actuation of a user operable button on the key fob; detecting the tilt angle of the key fob; determining if the detected tilt angle is within a predetermined range from horizontal; and transmitting a signal indicative of a remote keyless entry function associated with the user operable button if the detected tilt angle is within the predetermined range from the horizontal when the actuation of the user operable button is detected.
An advantage of an embodiment of the present invention is that the key fob is deactivated when it is not within a range around a preferred orientation. Thus, when the key fob is in a pocket or a purse, where it is likely not within the range of the preferred orientation, it will be deactivated. Thus, an inadvertently pressed button on the key fob will not cause the function to be performed on the vehicle.
A further advantage of an embodiment of the present invention is that the deactivation may be applied selectively to only certain functions where an inadvertent button press is a concern.
An additional advantage of an embodiment of the present invention is that the orientation based button deactivation may be disabled for those who wish to be able to activate RKE functions no matter what the key fob orientation. Thus, the key fob may be active even while the key fob is still in ones pocket or purse.
The RKE system 20 also includes a key fob 30 having a housing 32 with exposed buttons. These vehicle function buttons may include, for example, door lock 34, door unlock 36, trunk release 38, and alarm 40 buttons. The key fob 30 also includes a fob controller 42, powered by a battery 44, a transmitter 46, capable of transmitting a radio frequency (RF) signal 48 that can be received by the receiver 26, and a tilt sensor 50. The fob controller 42 is in communication with the transmitter 46, tilt sensor 50 and the vehicle function buttons 34, 36, 38, 40. The details of the fob controller 42, transmitter 46 and other electronic circuitry of the key fob 30 will not be discussed in detail herein since they are known to those skilled in the art. The transmitter 46 may be a transceiver if the RKE system 20 includes two-way communication, and may transmit the signal by wireless means other than by RF transmission, if so desired. Also, while the components in the key fob 30 are schematically illustrated as discrete components, they may be integrated, and/or may be mounted on a printed circuit board, if so desired.
The tilt sensor 50 is employed to detect the orientation of the fob 30 relative to a horizontal plane 56, (i.e., perpendicular to the direction of gravity). The tilt sensor 50 may be any one of different types of conventional gravity based sensors that can react to the angle the fob 30 is tilted from horizontal. For example, the tilt sensor 50 may employ a mercury switch. Moreover, the switch may detect actual upward tilting angle 52 and downward tilting angle 54, or may just detect whether the tilt sensor 50 is inside or outside of the desired range from the preferred horizontal orientation. The upward and downward tilt angles 52, 54 that form the range preferred orientation may be, for example, ten degrees each. Of course, different angles of inclination for deactivation may be employed instead, if so desired. While the key fob 30 is shown in
If the button deactivation function is disabled, then the fob controller 42 will actuate the transmitter 46 to transmit a RF signal, block 110, requesting the RKE function corresponding to the button that was pressed regardless of the tilt angle. The routine then ends, block 112. If the button deactivation function is not disabled, then a determination is made whether the RKE function requested is one of the preferred orientation functions, block 104. That is, the fob controller 42 may be configured so that only certain RKE functions will be deactivated based on the tilt angle while others stay activated no matter what the tilt angle. This selective use of the tilt based disabling may be advantageous if users are typically annoyed only when certain RKE functions are performed if buttons are inadvertently pressed while in a purse or pocket. For example, one may apply the tilt angle deactivation only to the trunk release and alarm RKE functions, while allowing the door lock RKE function to remain active no matter what the tilt angle. The decision step 104 is optional and may be left out of the fob controller 42, if so desired.
If the button pressed is for a RKE function that is not a preferred orientation function, then the fob controller 42 will actuate the transmitter 46 to transmit a RF signal, block 110, requesting the RKE function corresponding to the button that was pressed regardless of the tilt angle. The routine then ends, block 112. If the button pressed is for a RKE function that is a preferred orientation function, then the tilt angle is detected, block 106. Again, this may be detection of an actual angle, or just a detection if the fob 30 is generally within the range of plus or minus angles 52, 54 from horizontal 56.
A determination is then made whether the tilt of the tilt sensor 50, and hence the fob 30, is within the range of preferred orientation, block 108. If the tilt is within the range, then the fob controller 42 will actuate the transmitter 46 to transmit a RF signal, block 110, requesting the RKE function corresponding to the button that was pressed. The routine then ends, block 112. If not, the routine ends, block 112, without performing any RKE function.
An alternative embodiment of the invention, although not necessarily as desirable as the first embodiment, may include the tilt sensor being located between the battery and the fob controller, with the tilt sensor blocking power to the fob controller when the fob is not within the range of preferred orientation. In this embodiment, then, the tilt sensor acts like a simple on-off power switch.
While certain embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention as defined by the following claims.
