Patent Application
20170314294
The present invention relates to and claims the priority of German patent application 10 2014 015 606.0, filed on 23 Oct. 2014, the disclosure of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference into the subject matter of the present application in its entirety.
The invention relates to a key for a locking system and a method for opening or closing the locking system.
Locking systems protect objects or information from unauthorised access. A mechanical or electronic lock having a corresponding mechanical or electronic key moves or controls for example a bolt system for locking a door. However, no lock or locking system is absolutely secure. With enough time, criminal energy and technical expenditure, most locks can be “cracked”. Keys are secretly copied, methods for opening without a key are devised, electronic systems are collected by espionage and defeated. For this reason, over time the technologies of locks and locking systems have been repeatedly further developed in order to make criminal access correspondingly more difficult.
Various types of locks or locking systems exist. In the case of a purely mechanical lock, mechanical unlocking for example of a door is achieved by means of a mechanical key. The force for moving the bolt results from the movement of the mechanical key, for example a rotary movement, once the shape of the key in the lock has been checked and corresponding mechanical features match the lock specification and permit the rotary movement. This shape of the lock, for example as a cylinder lock, is widespread.
In the case of an electrical locking system, an electrical or hydraulic operation moves the bolts. The key that fits the lock merely triggers this operation. This may be done by a simple motor control or by appropriate data items, for example to a central location. Frequent applications include so-called transponder locks, in which an electronic key exchanges data with a corresponding electronic lock.
A: mechanical lock
Typically, a mechanical key carries mechanical features that are externally visible and that are correspondingly checked in the lock. If the key and the lock match, locking is permitted, with the result that turning the key can trigger a further mechanical operation.
Advantage of Mechanical Locks:
They are relatively simple to manufacture, and keys may be passed to other persons without problems. Usually, the keys are made of metal and also withstand high temperatures, for example in the event of a fire.
The disadvantage of locks of this kind consists in so-called lock picking, that is to say opening a mechanical lock using corresponding methods and tools. The fact that there are even official championships for this demonstrates the insecurity of locks of this kind. Moreover, mechanical keys are typically easy to copy, since the key's mechanical “information” is openly shown.
A further type of lock is the combination lock, in which entering an appropriate number triggers an opening mechanism.
Disadvantage: passing on the combination “key” is problematic, since the person receiving it may have to note a relatively long sequence of numbers.
Numbers may be forgotten, in particular when there is time pressure.
B: electronic lock:
The key of an electronic lock comprises electronic components that exchange information by radio or optical link when a magnetic card or the key is brought close to the lock, or in the event of manual activation. If access is authorised, a corresponding opening mechanism is then actuated electrically, for example by way of a servo motor.
Advantage of Electronic Lock:
Data may be managed in central processors, for example ideally as a time-recording system. (Electronic) lock picking is difficult or impossible.
Disadvantage of electronic keys: mechanically sensitive, and can easily become faulty. Can be spied on. Does not withstand high temperatures; in the event of a fire an electronic key is typically irreparably destroyed.
The more difficult it is to pick a lock or to copy a key, the more reliable the locking system. In the case of the cylinder locks which are usual today, a key may be reworked within a few minutes without any problems at all by any specialist locksmith or suitable service provider such as are to be found today in many shopping centres. Even high-security keys only provide “higher” levels of security to the extent that they are not (legally) permitted to be reworked by key service providers because of corresponding regulations. From a technical point of view, copying a key of this kind is hardly ever a problem. There is thus only security against forgery because of corresponding agreements. Nowadays, even a photo of a key taken from some distance away is sufficient to make a complete functional copy of the key using a 3D printer.
Taking this prior art as a starting point, the disclosure provides a key, a locking system and a locking method that are not copiable, or only with the appropriate expertise and considerable technical expenditure, and cannot be actuated by any other desired method without the key that fits.
The invention describes a locking system that comprises a forgery-proof key and a corresponding electronic reader unit. On the key itself, neither the code of the key nor the change that has been made to the microstructure of its metal are detectable, visible or perceptible by touch by people without further aids. The quantum-physically encoded key looks for example simply like a solid metal bar which may be of any desired shape. The code takes place deep into the base body, with the result that external influences such as damage to the surface do not impair the function of the key. Similarly, these quantum-physical changes to the metal microstructure of the solid metal body of the key are scannable without mechanical interaction. The quantum key that is prepared in this way has no features of the code that are visible to the naked eye or perceptible by touch, and may take any desired shape. A length of approximately 70 mm accommodates more than 500 billion different codes.
Thus the key used in the locking system resists very strong mechanical forces, very high wear or very high temperatures. Encoding of the key is based on quantum-physical solid body cryptography. In so doing, the material of the solid base body is partially changed such that this change can be read out by means of suitable reading methods.
Moreover, external coatings using anodisation, polishing, staining or indeed sanding and sand blasting have no effect on the function. It is also possible to incorporate key labelling, promotional material, etc. into the surface by way of deep stamping.
The locking system contains a decoding unit for decoding the codes that have been quantum-physically incorporated into the solid metal of the key. In this way, the arrangement provides a locking system that is forgery-proof and tamper-proof to the very highest level, based on quantum-physical solid body cryptography.
Further advantages are apparent from the subclaims and the description given below of an exemplary embodiment.
The invention is explained in more detail below with reference to an exemplary embodiment that is illustrated in the attached Figures, in which:
The invention is now explained in more detail by way of example, with reference to the attached drawings. However, the exemplary embodiments are only examples, which are not intended to restrict the inventive concept to a particular arrangement. Before the invention is described in detail it should be pointed out that it is not restricted to the respective constituent parts of the device and the respective method steps, since these constituent parts and methods may vary. The terms used here are merely intended to describe particular embodiments and are not used restrictively. Moreover, where the singular or the indefinite article is used in the description or the claims, this also refers to a plurality of these elements unless the overall context unambiguously indicates otherwise.
Within the context of this invention, the term “lock” is not used for the mechanical locking device but, strictly speaking, for a reader unit that is able to read a code on a key and then, if the code that is read matches the code stored for the lock, such as a numerical sequence, to release the mechanical locking device. In this context, for example the locking channel 2.8 is also actually a reader channel.
In the invention described here, a key 1.1 is used, comprising a solid, preferably monolithic, metal part with no structures that are visible or perceptible by touch in any way. In the exemplary embodiment, the key comprises a short stainless-steel bar having for example a length of 120 mm and a diameter of 8 mm. The end of this stainless-steel bar is shaped appropriately for better manageability, and is provided with a hole 1.3 for the conventional key ring 1.4. The end that is inserted into the keyhole is rounded.
The lock in the exemplary embodiment comprises a round or square stainless-steel cylinder, with a cover plate at one end and electrical terminals at the other end. The “keyhole” is a round opening in the cover plate. Located in the interior of the cylinder are the electronics, which scan the key 1.1 by way of corresponding sensors and read the code. The key itself is guided in a tube that has an internal diameter only a little larger than the 8 mm of the key, in the exemplary embodiment a Teflon tube having an internal diameter of for example 8.5 mm. The key is guided freely in the tube and does not make contact, mechanically or electrically, at any point. Seen from this point of view, the keyhole 2.5 is hermetically sealed from the detection system, that is to say for example that no gas or similar can be introduced into the locking system.
For unlocking or locking, the key is simply introduced into the keyhole 2.5, in any desired position, as far as it will go. Once the corresponding code of the key has been read, an opening or closing operation can be triggered electrically. However, the key may also be turned—in the manner of its mechanical counterpart—for example anticlockwise or clockwise, in order only then to initiate unlocking, or clockwise or anticlockwise, in order to trigger a closing operation.
The key is encoded by making a quantum-technical change to the material of the key body, deep in the key body. The cryptographic information of the key number is encoded in these changes.
In the exemplary embodiment of the key body that is 70 mm long and has a diameter of 8 mm according to
Moreover, external coatings using anodisation, polishing, staining or indeed sanding and sand blasting have no effect on the function. It is also possible to incorporate key labelling, promotional material, etc. into the surface by way of deep stamping.
In the exemplary embodiment of
Located in the code region 1.5 is the quantum-technical code of the key, which is invisible even to an attentive observer. Over a length of for example 70 mm, quantum-technical codes are incorporated such that more than 500 billion different cryptographic options can be used.
According to
Located close to the keyhole 2.5 is a sensor 2.3 for detecting a key. This sensor 2.3 detects the fact that the key has been inserted, and activates the sensor unit 2.2 for reading the quantum-physical code of the key. In the exemplary embodiment, the sensor 2.3 consumes an extremely small amount of current from the supply voltage 3.4. In this way, the system is perfectly able to operate for a very long time independently, powered by battery. Once the insertion of a key has been detected, the reader unit 2.2 for reading the quantum-technical code is activated. Admittedly, reading the code consumes more energy, but this is only for a few milliseconds for each opening and closing operation. As a result, the average energy consumption remains very low, with the result that operation using battery power can be guaranteed for a period of years. Naturally, the sensor 2.3 can also be dispensed with if sufficient energy is permanently available.
All the keys that are manufactured carry an absolutely unique number between one and 500 billion. The corresponding key number is allocated to the evaluation electronics 3.1 in the lock by means of programming, with the result that only this or further programmed numbers can open the lock. If for example a central locking facility is used, it is possible for further numerical combinations also to be associated with a corresponding key and passed on by way of the interface 3.2, for example to a central processor. In the case of an individual locking facility, the electronics of the interface 3.2 may of course also actuate an opening mechanism directly, for example by means of servo motor.
In the exemplary embodiment, after insertion of the key—which may incidentally be introduced into the keyhole in any desired position—and after identification of the correct opening authorisation, further turning of the key is detected. Thus, for example, once the key has been inserted and the key has then been turned anticlockwise or clockwise, an opening mechanism may open for example of a door. Similarly, turning clockwise or anticlockwise would lock the door again. In this way, the same intuitive function as in the case of a mechanical lock is achieved, but without any mechanical function being performed.
In the exemplary embodiment according to
In the absence of the quantum key, with a supply voltage of 3 V the sensor 2.3 for key detection consumes only a current of 1.5 μA. Once the quantum key has been introduced, the sensor 2.3 activates the reader unit 2.2 for reading the quantum code of the key 1.1, the evaluation electronics 3.1 and the interface 3.2. The time needed for evaluation by the reader unit 2.2 is correspondingly short, as is the time needed for evaluation of the correct key number and data transmission, with the result that the average current consumption with approximately 100 closing and opening operations per day is under 10 μA.
The quantum key 1.1 may of course also take any other desired shape, for example that of a flat disc. The essential point is that the reader unit 2.2 for reading the quantum code can detect the code appropriately.
The key 1.1 for the locking system 2.0 is formed by a metal body that has along its length and/or its periphery a code region 1.5 for a code 3.3 for opening or closing a lock. The code 3.3 is formed by quantum-physical changes to the metal microstructure of the metal body, and these are not perceptible to people without further aids, in particular being neither visible nor perceptible by touch. The metal body of the key 1.1 may take any desired shape. For example, the metal body of the key may be in the shape of a bar, preferably a round bar, which preferably has a constant diameter along the code region 1.5.
The code 3.3 is formed in the code region 1.5 by making quantum-physical changes to the metal microstructure of the solid metal body of the key 1.1 wherein these changes are scannable without mechanical interaction. Here, the invention makes use of the realisation that such quantum-technical changes to the metal microstructure result in a change in the energy exchange, in particular with an alternating magnetic field. This change may be measured by evaluating the hysteresis losses, that is to say that the quantum-physical changes are scannable electromagnetically, for example. At the same time, however, these changes are not perceptible by people without further aids or with the naked eye, in particular being neither visible nor perceptible by touch. Externally, the key has rather the appearance for example of a round bar or similar. The quantum-physical changes are within the mesoscopic range. In solid state physics, a transitional range lying between the microscopic and the macroscopic is called mesoscopic. Put simply, the mesoscopic range extends on a length scale from about a nanometre to about a micron. A multiplicity of these changes made to the metal microstructure then together represent a code within a code zone 1.8. If a plurality of items of information are incorporated next to one another in a code zone along the periphery of the key 1.1, this applies to every individual item of information. This means that each partial item of information of the code comprises a multiplicity of mesoscopic changes that are not perceptible externally. Typically, these changes are from 0.1 to 2 mm in length or in diameter.
As well as the key 1.1, the locking system includes a lock having a locking channel 2.8 for introduction of the key 1.1. Associated with the locking channel 2.8 is a decoding unit for decoding the code 3.3 of the key 1.1. The shape of the reader unit 2.2 of the decoding unit is adapted to the shape of the metal body. The metal body of the key 1.1 is for example formed by a round bar having an external diameter AD that is slightly smaller than the internal diameter ID of the locking channel 2.8. The reader unit 2.2 is arranged on the locking channel 2.8 and is hermetically separated from the locking channel 2.8. Here, it is also possible for a plurality of reader devices for each individual code zone 1.8 to be provided, arranged serially one behind the other, but typically one reader unit is arranged at the periphery of the locking channel 2.8, preferably in a plane transverse to the longitudinal direction of the locking channel, and this reads, one after the other, the items of information that are encoded in the individual code zones 1.8 when the key 1.1 is introduced into the locking channel 2.8.
According to
During opening or closing, the key 1.1 is introduced into the elongate locking channel 2.8. It has along its length and/or its periphery the code 3.3 for opening or closing the lock, which is encoded by making a quantum-physical change to the metal microstructure of the solid metal body. The key 1.1 is introduced into the locking channel 2.8 in any desired position, and once the code 3.3 of the key 1.1 has been correctly identified, turning the key 1.1 about its longitudinal axis brings about opening or closing of the lock.
It goes without saying that this description may be subject to the broadest possible variety of modifications, changes and adaptations which are within the range of equivalents to the attached claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2014 015 606.0 | Oct 2014 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2015/002104 | 10/23/2015 | WO | 00 |
