Examples described herein relate to distributed software systems. Examples of cluster orchestration services that store key values with a higher software layer, such as a container orchestration service are described.
Distributed computing systems generally include multiple computing nodes which cooperate together to provide computing services. Frequently, multiple computing nodes may each run instances of a particular service—and the instances of the service cooperate together to perform the service as a whole.
Distributed systems may pose a variety of complexities. Coordination may be needed between the computing nodes to ensure services are accurately performed and that the system as a whole is resilient to failure of one or more of the computing nodes.
Moreover, software stacks may be utilized on computing nodes, including on computing nodes of distributed systems. Each layer of the software stack may perform designated functions, and may interact with other layers in the stack to provide inputs to a next layer, or receive outputs from a previous layer. In this manner, the layers may be somewhat modular.
Coordinating the interaction between layers of a software stack or services on a node as needed may accordingly be complex but important to ensuring efficient, accurate, and reliable operation of a distributed system.
Examples described herein relate to containerized clustered computing systems which may be used to provide a platform as a service (PaaS) environment. Examples of clustered computing systems described herein may manage metadata used to administer the cluster in a manner which improves the reliability and efficiency of cluster operations in some examples. In particular, key values (e.g., metadata) used by cluster orchestrators to manage computing node clusters may be stored in a different (e.g., higher) software layer than that of the cluster orchestrator. For example, a container orchestrator (e.g., Kubernetes) may be used to store and manage the storage of key values used to manage a cluster of computing nodes. The use of a higher software layer to manage this key value storage may provide a higher availability of the key value stores and greater resiliency to node failure.
A cluster orchestrator may be used to manage a cluster of computing nodes. A container orchestrator may be used to manage containers used on one or more of the computing nodes. The container orchestrator may be provided in a different software layer, a higher software layer, than the cluster orchestrator. The clustered system may be configured (e.g., setup or installed) by initiating a bootstrap node including a first cluster infrastructure orchestrator and first container orchestrator. Cluster metadata may be migrated (e.g., copied) to a key value store of the first container orchestrator (e.g., managed by the first container orchestrator). A second node in the cluster may be configured (e.g., setup or installed) by configuring a second cluster infrastructure orchestrator of the second node with a dependency on the first container orchestrator of the bootstrap node. The dependency may be created, for example, because the cluster infrastructure orchestrator may utilize metadata (which may be referred to as cluster metadata) stored by the container orchestrator in order to complete setup (e.g., for the second computing node to join the cluster).
Multi-cloud platform as a service systems (PaaS) may utilize computing clusters, including computing clusters utilizing containerized systems. Configuration, updates, and other tasks associated with such computing clusters may be complicated by installation of both cluster infrastructure orchestrators and container orchestrators at each node of the cluster. For example, where the cluster infrastructure orchestrator is located below a container orchestrator, configuration or upgrade of new nodes in the cluster may involve storing a key value store used by the cluster infrastructure orchestrator on each computing node at the cluster infrastructure orchestrator layer. Repeating the task of creating the key value store may increase complexity of cluster configuration and increase complexity of recovery of the cluster in case of node failure. For example, where a node of the cluster is rebooted, reconfigured, updated, or newly added to the cluster, a key value store is newly added to the cluster infrastructure orchestrator of the node and the key value store is updated at each of the cluster nodes. It may be cumbersome to manage this key value storage across the cluster.
Creating the key value store at a container orchestrator layer of a node of the cluster may reduce complexity of configuration, upgrades, and failure recovery of the cluster. The container orchestrator may, for example, provide resilient storage of data such that high availability of the key value store may be achieved across the cluster. In some examples, during initialization of a bootstrap node, a key value store may be moved from the cluster infrastructure orchestrator to the container orchestrator (which may include simply storing the key value store in the container orchestrator initially). As new nodes are initialized and added to the cluster, cluster infrastructure orchestrators on subsequent nodes may be configured with a dependency on the container orchestrator of the bootstrap node, such that instead of creating a key value store at each node, the cluster infrastructure orchestrators may reference (e.g., access) the key value store created at the bootstrap node. During rebooting of a node, expansion of the cluster, upgrades, or other tasks which may include accessing and/or updating the cluster key value store, complexity may be reduced by the ability to update a shared cluster key value store, improving operation and user experience for services provided using containerized computing clusters.
Various embodiments of the present disclosure will be explained below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The detailed description includes sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments of the disclosure. Other embodiments may be utilized, and structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. The various embodiments disclosed herein are not necessarily mutually exclusive, as some disclosed embodiments can be combined with one or more other disclosed embodiments to form new embodiments.
The network 110 may include any type of network capable of routing data transmissions from one network device (e.g., of the computing cluster service domains 112, the bare metal system service domain(s) 120, the central computing system 106, and/or the cloud computing system service domain(s) 130) to another. For example, the network 110 may include a local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), intranet, or a combination thereof. The network 110 may include a wired network, a wireless network, or a combination thereof.
Each of the computing cluster service domains 112 may be hosted on a respective computing cluster platform having multiple computing nodes (e.g., each with one or more processor units, volatile and/or non-volatile memory, communication or networking hardware, input/output devices, or any combination thereof) and may be configured to host a respective PaaS software stack 114. Each of the bare metal system service domain(s) 120 may be hosted on a respective bare metal computing platform (e.g., each with one or more processor units, volatile and/or non-volatile memory, communication or networking hardware, input/output devices, or any combination thereof) and may be configured to host a respective PaaS software stack 122. Each of the cloud computing system service domain(s) 130 may be hosted on a respective public or private cloud computing platform (e.g., each including one or more data centers with a plurality of computing nodes or servers having processor units, volatile and/or non-volatile memory, communication or networking hardware, input/output devices, or any combination thereof) and may be configured to host a respective PaaS software stack 132. “Computing platform” as used herein may refer to any one or more of a computing cluster platform, a bare metal system platform, or a cloud computing platform. “Service domain” as used herein may refer to any of the computing cluster service domains 112, the bare metal system service domain(s) 120, or the cloud computing system service domain(s) 130. The PaaS software stacks (e.g., any of the PaaS software stack 114, the PaaS software stack 122, and/or the Paas software stack 132) may include platform-specific software configured to operate on the respective system. The software may include instructions that are stored on a computer readable medium (e.g., memory, disks, etc.) that are executable by one or more processor units (e.g., central processor units (CPUs), graphic processor units (GPUs), tensor processing units (TPUs), hardware accelerators, video processing units (VPUs), etc.) to perform functions, methods, etc., described herein. In this manner, a service domain generally refers to a one or more services which may be installed on (e.g., hosted by) a particular computing platform. The service domain may contain abstracted versions of services that may be configured as needed to run on the particular computing platform on which the service domain will be installed. In this manner, service domains may be present on any of a variety of computing platforms and nonetheless form a distributed computing system across platforms—multiple service domains may, for example, include instances of a same service which may in some examples communicate with other instances of the service across computing platforms to provide a service by the system as a whole. In some examples, centralized management of multiple (e.g., all) instances of a service may be provided, even across the varied computing platforms on which the service domains are instantiated.
The data sources 118, 126, and 136 may each include one or more devices or repositories configured to receive, store, provide, generate, etc., respective source data. The data sources may include input/output devices (e.g., sensors (e.g., electrical, temperature, matter flow, movement, position, biometric data, or any other type of sensor), cameras, transducers, any type of RF receiver, or any other type of device configured to receive and/or generate source data), enterprise or custom databases, a data lake (e.g., a large capacity data storage system that holds raw data) or any other source of data consumed, retrieved, stored, or generated by the service domains. The service domain construct may allow a customer to deploy applications to locations proximate relevant data, in some examples. In some examples, the service domain construct may allow a customer to deploy applications to computing platforms that have a particular computing resource (e.g., hardware or software configuration) and/or based on computing resource capacity.
In some examples, various components of the system may need access to other cloud services 128. To facilitate communication with the other cloud services 128, the data pipelines of the PaaS software stacks may be configured to provide interfaces between applications hosted on one or more of the service domains 112, 120, or 130 and the other cloud services 128 via the network 110. In some examples, the data pipeline(s) 116, 124, and/or 134 hosted on any of the PaaS software stacks 114, 122, and/or 132, respectively, may be configured to provide data from the other cloud services 128 to applications hosted on one or more of the service domains 112, 120, or 130 to aggregate, transform, store, analyze, etc., the data.
Each of the PaaS software stacks may include one or more applications, data pipelines, ML models, containers, data services, etc., or any combination thereof (e.g., applications). The applications may be configured to receive, process/transform, and output data from and to other applications. The applications may be configured to process respective received data based on respective algorithms or functions to provide transformed data. At least some of the applications may be dependent on availability of supporting services to execute, such as communication services, runtime services, read-write data services, ML inference services, container management services, etc., or any combination thereof.
The data pipelines 116, 124, and/or 134 may provide a conduit through which data can be passed (e.g., provided and/or received) between applications hosted in the PaaS software stack, as well as a conduit through which data can be passed among the different service domains or to the other cloud services 128 via the network 110. Generally, a data pipeline of the data pipelines 116, 124, and/or 134 may include an input component to receive data from another data pipeline, any data source, or other service domain or other cloud services 128 (via the network 110); and at least one transform component configured to manipulate the input data to provide the output data.
The data pipelines 116, 124, and/or 134 can be constructed using computing primitives and building blocks, such as VMs, containers, processes, or any combination thereof. In some examples, the data pipelines 116, 124, and/or 134 may be constructed using a group of containers (e.g., a pod) that each perform various functions within the data pipeline (e.g., subscriber, data processor, publisher, connectors that transform data for consumption by another container within the application or pod, etc.) to consume, transform, and produce messages or data. In some examples, the definition of stages of a constructed data pipeline application may be described using a user interface or REST API, with data ingestion and movement handled by connector components built into the data pipeline. Thus, data may be passed between containers of a data pipeline using API calls.
In some examples, the PaaS software stacks may further include respective ML inference services that are configured to load and execute respective ML model applications. Thus, the ML inference services may be configured to receive a request for an inference or prediction using a ML model, and to load a ML model application that includes the requested ML model into an inference engine. The inference engine may be configured to select a runtime based on a hardware configuration of the edge system, and execute the ML model on input data to provide inference or prediction data. The inference engine may be configured to optimize the ML model for execution based on a hardware configuration. The ML inference service may provide the benefits of GPU abstraction, built-in frameworks for ML model execution, decoupling application development from hardware deployment, etc. In some examples, the PaaS manager 108 may be configured to access data from the one or more data lakes, train a ML model using the transformed data, and generate an ML model application based on the trained ML model.
The one or more applications of the PaaS software stacks may be implemented using a containerized architecture that is managed via a container orchestrator. The container orchestration managed by a PaaS infrastructure and application lifecycle manager (PaaS manager 108) under the service domain construct may handle (e.g., using middleware) underlying details of the PaaS related to containerized management complexity, orchestration, security, and isolation, thereby making it easier for a customer or user to focus on managing the applications. The management may be scalable via categories. In some examples, the service domains may be configured to support multi-tenant implementations, such that data is kept securely isolated between tenants. The applications communicate using application programming interface (API) calls, in some examples. In some examples, the supporting services may also be implemented in the containerized architecture.
The PaaS manager 108 hosted on the central computing system 106 may be configured to centrally manage the PaaS infrastructure (e.g., including the service domains) and manage lifecycles of deployed applications. The central computing system 106 may include one or more computing nodes configured to host the PaaS manager 108. The central computing system 106 may include a cloud computing system and the PaaS manager 108 may be hosted in the cloud computing system and/or may be delivered/distributed using a software as a service (SaaS) model, in some examples. In some examples, the PaaS manager 108 may be distributed across a cluster of nodes of the central computing system 106.
In some examples, an administrative computing system 102 may be configured to host a PaaS manager interface 104. The PaaS manager interface 104 may be configured to facilitate user or customer communication with the PaaS manager 108 to control operation of the PaaS manager 108. The PaaS manager interface 104 may include a graphical user interface (GUI), APIs, command line tools, etc., that are each configured to facilitate interaction between a user and the PaaS manager 108. The PaaS manager interface 104 may provide an interface that allows a user to develop template applications for deployment of the service domains, identify on which service domains to deploy applications, move applications from one service domain to another, remove an application from a service domain, update an application, service domain, or PaaS software stack (e.g., add or remove available services, update deployed services, etc.).
In some examples, the PaaS manager 108 may be configured to manage, for each of the computing platforms, creation and deployment of service domains, creation and deployment of application bundles to the PaaS software stacks, etc. For example, the PaaS manager 108 may be configured to create and deploy service domains on one or more of the computing platforms. The computing platforms may include different hardware and software architectures that may be leveraged to create and deploy a service domain. Thus, the PaaS manager 108 may be configured to manage detailed steps associated with generating a service domain in response to a received request.
The PaaS manager 108 may also be configured to build and deploy different types of applications to one or more of the service domains. A user may elect to deploy an application to a type of platform based on various criteria, such as type of and/or availability of a service, proximity to source data, available computing resources (e.g., both type and available capacity), platform cost, etc., physical location of the platform, or any combination thereof.
When an application is generated, successful execution may depend on availability of various additional supporting services, such as a read/write data services (e.g., publish/subscribe service, search services, etc.), ML inference services, container management services, runtime services, etc., or any combination thereof. The PaaS manager 108 may abstract deployment of the additional supporting services, as some of these may be platform-specific. Thus, a user may provide information directed to an application to be deployed to the PaaS manager 108 and identify one or more target service domains, and the PaaS manager 108 may deploy the application to the target service domains. The target service domains provide services to be used by the application, and accordingly, the application need not include services provided by the service domain. Moreover, the application need not take platform-specific actions which may be typically required for starting those services. The PaaS manager 108 may deploy the respective application to the corresponding one of the one or more identified target service domains.
The ability of the PaaS manager 108 to abstract platform-specific details for creating and deploying a service domain and creating and deploying an application or application bundle to run in a service domain may make deployment of applications to different service domains more efficient for a user, as well as may provide a customer with a wider selections of platforms than would otherwise be considered. Thus, the service domain construct may allow a customer to focus on core concerns with an application, while shifting consideration of supporting services to the PaaS manager 108 and the service domains. The service domain construct may also make applications more “light weight” and modular for more efficient deployment to different service domains. The PaaS manager interface 104 may provide a GUI interface for selecting a type of application to be deployed to one or more service domains, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
The computing node 200 includes a communications fabric 222, which provides communication between one or more processor(s) 212, memory 214, local storage 202, communications unit 220, and I/O interface(s) 210. The communications fabric 222 can be implemented with any architecture designed for passing data and/or control information between processors (such as microprocessors, communications and network processors, etc.), system memory, peripheral devices, and any other hardware components within a system. For example, the communications fabric 222 can be implemented with one or more buses.
The memory 214 and the local storage 202 are computer-readable storage media. In this embodiment, the memory 214 includes random access memory RAM 216 and cache 218. In general, the memory 214 can include any suitable volatile or non-volatile computer-readable storage media. In an embodiment, the local storage 202 includes an SSD 204 and an HDD 206.
Various computer instructions, programs, files, images, etc., may be stored in local storage 202 for execution by one or more of the respective processor(s) 212 via one or more memories of memory 214. In some examples, local storage 202 includes a magnetic HDD 206. Alternatively, or in addition to a magnetic hard disk drive, local storage 202 can include the SSD 204, a semiconductor storage device, a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), a flash memory, or any other computer-readable storage media that is capable of storing program instructions or digital information.
The media used by local storage 202 may also be removable. For example, a removable hard drive may be used for local storage 202. Other examples include optical and magnetic disks, thumb drives, and smart cards that are inserted into a drive for transfer onto another computer-readable storage medium that is also part of local storage 202.
Communications unit 220, in some examples, provides for communications with other data processing systems or devices. In these examples, communications unit 220 includes one or more network interface cards. Communications unit 220 may provide communications through the use of either or both physical and wireless communications links.
I/O interface(s) 210 allow for input and output of data with other devices that may be connected to a computing node 200. For example, I/O interface(s) 210 may provide a connection to external devices such as a keyboard, a keypad, a touch screen, and/or some other suitable input device. External devices can also include portable computer-readable storage media such as, for example, thumb drives, portable optical or magnetic disks, and memory cards. Software and data used to practice embodiments of the present disclosure can be stored on such portable computer-readable storage media and can be loaded onto local storage 202 via I/O interface(s) 210. I/O interface(s) 210 may also connect to a display 208.
Display 208 provides a mechanism to display data to a user a may be, for example, a computer monitor. In some examples, a GUI associated with the PaaS manager interface 104 may be presented on the display 208.
Examples described herein accordingly include one or more clusters, such as cluster 302 of
Examples of computing nodes in clusters described herein may have operating systems. For example, the nodes 306, 308, and 310 of the cluster 302 include an operating system (e.g., operating systems 326, 328, and 330) configured to interface with the physical layer of each respective computing node. Any type of operating system may be used in various examples.
Examples of computing nodes in clusters described herein may have one or more cluster infrastructure orchestrators, which may also be called a cluster orchestrator. For example,
Examples of computing nodes in clusters described herein may have a container orchestrator, such as container orchestrator 312, container orchestrator 314, and/or container orchestrator 316 of
Generally, container orchestrators may be dependent on (e.g., may be in a higher software layer than) cluster infrastructure orchestrators. That is, typically, the container orchestrators may require the cluster infrastructure orchestrator to be operational prior to starting up (e.g., operating) the container orchestrator.
In examples described herein, a container orchestrator, such as container orchestrator 314 of
In examples described herein, the container orchestrator may be present in a different software layer than the cluster orchestrator of a same or different node. For example, inputs and outputs for communication between layers may be defined. In some examples, the container orchestrator may be provided in a higher software layer than the cluster orchestrator, which may reside in a lower software layer. Typically, software in a lower software layer will be started up and/or configured prior to startup and/or configuration of software in a higher software layer. Software in a higher software layer may have dependencies on software in a lower software layer. In examples described herein, the container orchestrator(s) may have dependencies on the cluster infrastructure orchestrator(s). For example, for proper operation of the container orchestrator, the cluster infrastructure orchestrator on a same node should be operational. Accordingly, software in a lower software layer typically may not be expected to have dependencies on software from a higher software layer. However, in examples described herein, cluster infrastructure orchestrators, such as cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322 of
In examples described herein, aspects of the clustered nature of the computing environment may be utilized to increase and/or ensure resilient operation of the computing nodes despite the dependency of a lower level software layer (e.g., cluster orchestrators) higher level software layers (e.g., container orchestrators). For example, one or more nodes of the cluster may be a bootstrap node, such as bootstrap node 308 of
Each cluster infrastructure orchestrator layer is configured with a dependency on the container orchestrator 314 of the bootstrap node 308. Accordingly, each cluster infrastructure orchestrator 320, 322, and 324 can access the cluster key value store 318 to use cluster metadata stored at the cluster key value store 318. Accordingly, where the cluster is scaled (e.g., by adding an additional node), the cluster infrastructure orchestrator of the new node can be configured with a dependency on the container orchestrator 314 of the bootstrap node 308 to access the cluster key value store 318 instead of a separate cluster key value store being created at the new node. Additionally, updated cluster metadata (e.g., metadata reflecting the additional node) is added to the shared cluster key value store 318 such that each individual cluster infrastructure orchestrator does not need to be updated to reflect changed metadata. Similarly, in the event of node failure or node reboot, the shared cluster key value store 318 can be updated and the cluster infrastructure orchestrator of the rebooted node may be configured to reference the shared cluster key value store 318 at the bootstrap node 308.
When a cluster is initially setup, a cluster infrastructure orchestrator may be installed on a bootstrap node. The metadata used by the cluster orchestrator of the bootstrap node, e.g., cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322 of
As other nodes come up, their cluster orchestrators (e.g., cluster infrastructure orchestrator 320 and cluster infrastructure orchestrator 324) may access cluster key value store 318 from a different node than their own node (e.g., from bootstrap node 308) in order to access (e.g., obtain) the metadata used to manage the cluster. In this manner, cluster orchestrators on other nodes may be able to start up prior to startup of the container orchestrators on their own nodes, because they can access the key value store through the container orchestrator of the bootstrap node. For example, a second node may be added to the cluster (e.g., node 306 may be added to cluster 302 of
In various implementations, clusters may include multiple bootstrap nodes, each having a cluster key value store to further protect the cluster from node failure. For example, where one of the multiple bootstrap nodes fails, cluster infrastructure orchestrators on the non-bootstrap nodes may reference the cluster key value store on the remaining bootstrap node.
Installation of the software stack may first bring up (e.g., start up) the operating system 328 at the bootstrap node 308 to provide an interface between the hardware of the bootstrap node 308 and software running on the bootstrap node 308. Once the operating system 328 is installed and initiated, the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322 is initiated, running on the operating system 328. At the time the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322 is initiated, cluster metadata used by the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322 may be stored at the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322. A container orchestrator 314 may be initiated (e.g., installed) above the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322 after initiation of the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322. When the container orchestrator 314 is initiated (e.g., installed), the cluster metadata stored locally at the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322 may be moved and/or copied to a cluster key value store 318 at the container orchestrator 314.
In block 404, a dependency of the cluster orchestrator is set to the container orchestrator on the bootstrap node. For example, after moving the cluster metadata from the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322 to the cluster key value store 318, the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322 may be configured with a dependency on the container orchestrator 314 to access the cluster metadata. In this manner, a dependency may be created such that the cluster orchestrator is dependent on the container orchestrator for proper operation. The cluster infrastructure orchestrator 322 may then access cluster metadata stored at the cluster key value store 318 to perform lifecycle management operations for the bootstrap node 308 of the cluster 302.
In block 406, additional nodes are added to the cluster with dependencies of the cluster orchestrator on the container orchestrator. For example, the node 306 may be configured as part of the cluster 302 by installing and initializing a PaaS software stack on the node 306. The operating system 326 may be installed and initialized first to provide a platform for other software on the node 306. When the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 320 is initialized at the node 306, the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 320 may be configured with a dependency on the container orchestrator 314 of the bootstrap node 308 for access to the cluster key value store 318. The container orchestrator 312 may then be initialized above the cluster infrastructure orchestrator 320.
Additional nodes may be added to the cluster 302 in a similar manner, where cluster infrastructure orchestrators of additional nodes are configured with dependencies on the container orchestrator 314 of the bootstrap node 308 for access to the cluster key value store 318. During the lifecycle of the cluster, cluster metadata at the cluster key value store 318 may be updated as nodes are added to or removed from the cluster or as the PaaS software stack is updated at the nodes of the cluster.
While certain components are shown in the figures and described throughout the specification, other additional, fewer, and/or alternative components may be included in the cluster 302 or other computing systems. Such additional, fewer, and/or alternative components are contemplated to be within the scope of this disclosure.
From the foregoing it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made while remaining with the scope of the claimed technology.
Examples described herein may refer to various components as “coupled” or signals as being “provided to” or “received from” certain components. It is to be understood that in some examples the components are directly coupled one to another, while in other examples the components are coupled with intervening components disposed between them. Similarly, signals may be provided directly to and/or received directly from the recited components without intervening components, but also may be provided to and/or received from the certain components through intervening components.
This application claims the benefit of the earlier filing date of U.S. Provisional Application 63/094,733, filed Oct. 21, 2020, which application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for any purpose.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6115830 | Zabarsky et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6550057 | Bowman-Amuah | Apr 2003 | B1 |
7237360 | Moncho et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7310664 | Merchant et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7516221 | Souder et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
8086895 | Maki et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8195976 | Rao et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8543665 | Ansari et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8549518 | Aron | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8572138 | Sundar et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8601473 | Aron et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8700946 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8850130 | Aron et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8863124 | Aron | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8977886 | Bauer et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9009106 | Aron et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9027024 | Mick et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9069708 | Gill et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9176829 | Jain et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9210534 | Matthieu et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9244951 | Mandelstein et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9253252 | Agarwal et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9336132 | Aron et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9600494 | Maluf et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9606794 | Chou et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9633197 | Lakshmanan et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9634893 | Boutros et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9641650 | Virkki et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9652265 | Narayanasamy et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9684502 | Fu et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9729411 | Purusothaman | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9736194 | Rao et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9747176 | Oppermann | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9747287 | Bhardwaj et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9769032 | Ghodsi | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9772866 | Aron et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9785513 | Ben-Or et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9836234 | Colgrove et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9836296 | Vandikas et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9848041 | Einkauf et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9860677 | Agerstam et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9917865 | Arora et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9921769 | Aron et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9948711 | Cors et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9977415 | Zimmerman et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10002058 | Shanmugam et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10091270 | Fang | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10149154 | Zimmerman et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10156842 | Wu et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10181978 | Argenti | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10225335 | Fu et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10230798 | Doraiswamy et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10262019 | Reiner et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10291714 | Mathews et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10305747 | Shahab et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10306513 | Bartfai-Walcott et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10346252 | Gould et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10372565 | Peng et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10467216 | Aron et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10489138 | Wu et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10515119 | Kirk et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10534629 | St. Pierre et al. | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10567925 | Ly et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10652226 | Islam et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10657012 | Madduri et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10671445 | Nucci et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10685295 | Ross et al. | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10726302 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10769113 | Jones | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10776213 | Chakankar et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10831525 | Ramesh et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10838833 | Jibaja et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10846079 | Olderdissen et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10846129 | Hermenier | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10877791 | Ramesh et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10884808 | Chintalapally et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10893116 | Koehler | Jan 2021 | B1 |
10895997 | Franciosi et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10924342 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10963283 | Lu et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10963356 | Gill et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11108849 | Tofighbakhsh et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11178213 | Desai et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11194483 | Dontu et al. | Dec 2021 | B1 |
11301762 | Chen et al. | Apr 2022 | B1 |
11316733 | Johson et al. | Apr 2022 | B1 |
11379525 | Deutsch et al. | Jul 2022 | B1 |
11397692 | Chhabra et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11409756 | Park et al. | Aug 2022 | B1 |
11422863 | Sengupta et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11429893 | Tong | Aug 2022 | B1 |
11501881 | Patil et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11579991 | Gill et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
11635990 | Singh et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11665221 | Joshi et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
11726764 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
12021915 | Joshi et al. | Jun 2024 | B2 |
12026551 | Singh et al. | Jul 2024 | B2 |
12155731 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2024 | B2 |
12159178 | Patil et al. | Dec 2024 | B2 |
20020143819 | Han et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040177359 | Bauch et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050060328 | Suhonen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060130042 | Dias et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070233698 | Sundar et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080270515 | Chen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090204711 | Binyamin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090260004 | Datta et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100008510 | Zayas | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100077473 | Takeshita et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100175061 | Maeda et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100250824 | Belay | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110153824 | Chikando et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110231899 | Pulier et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110251992 | Bethlehem et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265077 | Collison et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120102486 | Yendluri | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120167081 | Sedayao et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120265884 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266156 | Spivak et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281708 | Chauhan et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130219479 | Desoto et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227573 | Morsi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130304903 | Mick et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130332916 | Chinn et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140074539 | Doering et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075412 | Kannan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075431 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140164486 | Ravinchandran et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140279899 | Gu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140317261 | Shatzkamer et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330948 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140372508 | Fausak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150057817 | Endrizzi et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150067030 | Smith et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150074106 | Ji | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089504 | Hartman et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150120893 | Sapaliga et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150261876 | Trikha et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150339200 | Madduri et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150347542 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150370502 | Aron et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160007138 | Palanisamy et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026541 | Gill et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160092176 | Straub et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092180 | Straub | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092348 | Straub et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094398 | Choudhury et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160098265 | Mahajan et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112268 | Chung et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160156614 | Jain et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160179635 | Kondalsamy et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160197830 | Ulevitch et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202964 | Butcher et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160204977 | Cui et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160216959 | Kurian et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160234071 | Nambiar et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160246528 | Colgrove et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160315848 | Weinstein | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160315912 | Mayya et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160323161 | Cuervo Laffaye et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160323361 | Austel et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160323377 | Einkauf et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160337104 | Kalligudd | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160337175 | Rao | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160342906 | Shaashua et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160344745 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160345516 | Britt et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160357525 | Wee et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160378622 | Ren et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170005820 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170006135 | Siebel et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170048079 | Nethi et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170060574 | Malladi et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170097950 | Meacham et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170099176 | Jain | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170102931 | Risbood et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170116100 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170123939 | Maheshwari et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170126809 | Chen et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170142068 | Devarajan et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170149931 | Lochhead et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170168813 | Pogrebinsky et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170171607 | Britt | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170177334 | Chou et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170177877 | Suarez et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170180272 | Bernath | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170180346 | Suarez et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170185507 | Eberlein | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170185922 | Lange et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170187807 | Clernon | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170201411 | Mladin et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170201585 | Doraiswamy et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170212718 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170213157 | Bugay et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170244600 | Hussein et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170257432 | Fu et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170289173 | Resch et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170315820 | Entezari et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170347264 | Holland et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180007055 | Infante-lopez et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180013819 | Li | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180034914 | Christopher et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180054315 | Liu et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180054490 | Wadhwa et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180067830 | Jagtiani et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180092151 | Liu et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180101415 | Mahindru et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180109395 | Berdy et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180109650 | Berdy et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180109929 | Ly et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180123820 | Kim | May 2018 | A1 |
20180159745 | Byers et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180165166 | Wang et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180167392 | Zakaria | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180212970 | Chen et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180219877 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180234351 | Amento et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180293463 | Brown | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180295194 | Deraz et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180300124 | Malladi et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180302266 | Makovsky et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180302340 | Alvarez Callau et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180307464 | Bijani et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180307537 | Chen et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180309819 | Thompson | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180314808 | Casey et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180324204 | Mcclory et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180332116 | George et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180338242 | Li et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180373419 | Chen et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373555 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190014048 | Krishna Singuru | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190018951 | James et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190026082 | Shalev et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190034837 | Lou et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190041824 | Chavez et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190045033 | Agerstam et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190068445 | Chauhan et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190087220 | Turner | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190098113 | Park et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190102265 | Ngo | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190109816 | Liu et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190114211 | Reddipalli et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190121889 | Gold et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190123959 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190141022 | Reeve et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190146773 | Attard | May 2019 | A1 |
20190158353 | Johnson et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190158600 | Cook | May 2019 | A1 |
20190182333 | Bartfai-Walcott et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190188742 | Vasudevan et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190190776 | Bregman | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190213273 | Vasudevan et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190235978 | Wu et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190243836 | Nanda et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190251166 | Penrose et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190286353 | Soni et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190295012 | Marinescu et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190317869 | Selvaraj et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190319919 | Knecht et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190320038 | Walsh | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190324874 | Gill et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190342182 | Dhanabalan et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190384641 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200014607 | Gangaadhar et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200014633 | You et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200034776 | Peran et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200073739 | Rungta et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200092789 | Lee et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200097274 | Sarkar et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200104723 | Reissner et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200112487 | Inamdar et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200122038 | Ebrahimi et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200126129 | Lkhamsuren | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200127832 | Ebrahimi | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200150945 | Olderdissen et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200150946 | Olderdissen et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200177503 | Hooda et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200177630 | Penner et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200192690 | Gupta | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200218580 | Kim | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200249973 | Ramesh et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200250002 | Gururaj et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200258627 | Setegn et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200274776 | Nishikawa | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200287737 | Mishra et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200336467 | Subbarayan et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200356415 | Goli | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210004270 | Singh et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210005330 | Patil et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210006636 | Koehler et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210042104 | Tashkandi | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210042160 | Alamouti et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210044579 | Nelson-Gal et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210058338 | Liu | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210067607 | Gardner et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210084670 | Chauhan et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210089408 | Park | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210112059 | Heldman et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210112128 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210140815 | Pretorius et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210160338 | Koehler et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210232344 | Corrie | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210232469 | Gill | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210255846 | Mamgain et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210271565 | Bhavanarushi | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210311764 | Rosoff | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210342193 | Anand | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210373965 | Hadas | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210400043 | Su et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220083018 | Majeed et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220083389 | Poothia et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220138070 | Mokashi et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220147336 | Joshi et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220279046 | Perng et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220334882 | Wang | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20230070811 | Patil et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230141808 | Joshi et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230289225 | Singh et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101916200 | Aug 2015 | CN |
110795442 | Apr 2022 | CN |
2831746 | Feb 2015 | EP |
9945465 | Sep 1999 | WO |
2014007811 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2016109743 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2016195841 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2020096639 | May 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Anthos”, Google Cloud https://cloud.google.com/anthos, Apr. 21, 2020, pp. 1-26. |
“Architecting for the Cloud: AWS Best Practice”, Amazon Web Services https://d1.awsstatic.com/whitepapers/AWS_Cloud_Best_Practices.pdf, Oct. 2018, pp. 1-50. |
“Best Practices for Cloud Management”, Service Now https://www.servicenow.com/content/dam/servicenow-assets/public/en-us/doc-type/resource-center/solution-brief/sb-cloud-management.pdf, Jun. 2017, pp. 1-2. |
“Cisco Edge Intelligence At-a-Glance”, Cisco https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/internet-of-things/at-a-glance-c45-743263.html, Nov. 3, 2020, pp. 1-3. |
“Cisco Edge Intelligence Data Sheet”, Cisco https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/internet-of-things/datasheet-c78-743838.html, Aug. 17, 2020, pp. 1-8. |
“Hybrid Cloud with AWS”, Aws https://d1.awsstatic.com/whitepapers/hybrid-cloud-with-aws.pdf, Nov. 2020, pp. 1-20. |
“IBM Edge Application Manager”, IBM https://www.ibm.com/cloud/edge-application-manager, May 5, 2020. |
“IoT at the Edge: Bringing intelligence to the edge using Cloud IoT (Cloud Next '18)”, YouTube; Google Cloud Tech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-T9MNR-BI8I, Aug. 17, 2018, pp. 1. |
“MPRM: An Overview”, ProSyst http:/documentation.bosch-si.com/iot/PRM/v6.0/welcome/mprm_functional.html, Jun. 13, 2017, pp. 1-3. |
“Multicloud Application Patterns”, VMWare Docs https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-Tanzu-Service-Mesh/services/concepts-guide/GUID-4123C2ED-EC61-4CDA-A38D-2A7454BDDA46.html, Jul. 7, 2020, pp. 1-2. |
“Setting up ServiceNow Cloud Management”, DxSherpa https://dxsherpa.com/blogs/setting-up-servicenow-cloud-management/, Jul. 19, 2018, pp. 1-10. |
“VIDEO—Intro to IBM Edge Application Manager”, IBM https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/intro-to-ibm-edge-application-manager, May 13, 2020, pp. 1-16. |
“Welcome to Azure Arc”, YouTube, Microsoft Azure https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zdJJ97pNT4, Feb. 19, 2020, pp. 1. |
“What is Anthos?”, YouTube, Google Cloud Tech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qtwt7QcW4J8, Apr. 21, 2020, pp. 1. |
Carey, Scott , “The major hybrid cloud options compared: AWS Outposts vs Azure Stack vs Google Anthos”, ComputerWorld https://www.computerworld.com/article/3428108/the-major-hybrid-cloud-options-compared-aws-outposts-vs-azure-stack-vs-google-anthos.html, Nov. 6, 2019, pp. 1-9. |
Holzle, Urs , et al., “Introducing Anthos: An entirely new platform for managing applications in today's multi-cloud world”, Google Cloud Blog https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/hybrid-cloud/new-platform-for-managing-applications-in-todays-multi-cloud-world, Apr. 9, 2019, pp. 1-6. |
Iyengar, Ashok , et al., “Clusters at the Edge”, IBM https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/clusters-at-the-edge, Dec. 9, 2020, pp. 1-13. |
Lewis, Sarah , “Cloudify”, TechTarget https://www.techtarget.com/searchcloudcomputing/definition/Cloudify, Jun. 2019, pp. 1. |
Manicka, Naveen , et al., “Simplify IoT Edge-to-Multi-Cloud Data Flow with Cisco Edge Intelligence”, Cisco | Cisco Blogs https://blogs.cisco.com/developer/edge-intelligence-sandbox-lab, Aug. 6, 2020, pp. 1-7. |
Marko, Kurt , “SAP to the fore as Cloud Foundry grows into the preferred platform for cloud-native enterprise apps”, Diginomica https://diginomica.com/cloud-foundry-growing-preferred-platform-cloud-native-enterprise-applications, Jun. 19, 2017, pp. 1-10. |
Mohamed, Riaz , “Deploy Cloud Agnostic Applications with VMware vRealize Automation Cloud”, VMWare Cloud Management https://blogs.vmware.com/management/2019/09/cloud-agnostic-apps-vra-cloud.html, Sep. 17, 2019, pp. 1-10. |
Morabito, Roberto , et al., “A Framework Based on SDN and Containers for Dynamic Service Chains on IoT Gateways”, Proceedings of the Workshop on Hot Topics in Container Networking and Networked Systems. Ericsson Research, NomadicLab, Aug. 11, 2017, pp. 42-47. |
Msv, Janakiram , “Google Forays Into Edge Computing With Cloud IoT Edge and TPU”, Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv/2018/07/30/google-forays-into-edge-computing-through-cloud-iot-edge-and-tpu/?sh=5e68b3fc6005, Jul. 30, 2018, pp. 1-4. |
Msv, Janakiram , “Why Azure Arc Is a Game Changer for Microsoft”, Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv/2019/11/05/why-azure-arc-is-a-game-changer-for-microsoft/?sh=373f5c854307, Nov. 5, 2019, pp. 1-10. |
Nolle, Tom , “Guide to Google Anthos architecture and management”, TechTarget https://www.techtarget.com/searchcloudcomputing/tip/Guide-to-Google-Anthos-architecture-and-management, Aug. 27, 2020, pp. 1-7. |
Poccia, Danilo , “New—AWS IoT Greengrass Adds Container Support and Management of Data Streams at the Edge”, AWS | AWS News Blog https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-aws-iot-greengrass-adds-docker-support-and-streams-management-at-the-edge/, Nov. 25, 2019, pp. 1-7. |
Stakun, Jaroslaw , “Introduction to Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform”, Open Virtualization Pro https://www.openvirtualization.pro/red-hat-openshift-container-platform/, Apr. 26, 2019, pp. 1. |
Wiggers, Steef-Jan , “Google Cloud Platform Release Edge TPU and Cloud IoT Edge”, InfoQ https://www.infoq.com/news/2018/07/google-iot-edge-tpu-ai/, Jul. 30, 2018, pp. 1-4. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/376,581 titled “Common Services Model for Multi-Cloud Platform” filed Jul. 15, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/522,567, titled “Apparatus and Method for Deploying a Machine Learning Inference as a Service at Edge Systems”, dated Jul. 25, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/666,242, titled “Scalable Centralized Internet-ofThings Manager”, dated Oct. 28, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/920,235, titled “Apparatus and Method for Deploying a Mobile Device as a Data Source in an IoT System”, dated Jul. 2, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/945,306, titled “Platform-as-a-Service Deployment Including Service Domains”, dated Jul. 31, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/148,231 titled “Upgrade Systems for Service Domains” filed Jan. 13, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/187,220 titled “Generic Proxy Endpoints Using Protocol Tunnels Including Life Cycle Management and Examples for Distributed Cloud Native Services and Applications” filed Feb. 26, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/302,189 titled “User Interface and Health Status Monitoring for a Multi Service Domainsystem” filed Apr. 27, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/350,636 titled “AI Inference Hardware Resource Scheduling” filed Jun. 17, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/522,567 titled “Machine Inference as a Service” filed Jul. 25, 2019, pp. all. |
“BtrPlace: An Open-Source Flexible Virtual Machine Scheduler”, University Nice Sophia Antipolis, pp. 1-8. |
“Multi-Process Service”, Nvidia, vR450, https://docs.nvidia.com/deploy/pdf/CUDA_Multi_Process_Service_Overview.pdf Jun. 2020, pp. 1-28. |
“TensorFlow Serving”, GitHub, https://github.com/tensorflow/serving pp. 1-4. |
Abadi, Martin et al., “TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems”, Preliminary White Paper, http://download.tensorflow.org/paper/whitepaper2015.pdf Nov. 9, 2015, pp. 1-19. |
Goldsborough, Peter et al.“A Tour of TensorFlow: Proseminar Data Mining”, Technische Universität München, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.01178.pdf Oct. 2016, pp. 1-16. |
Grammatikou, Mary et al., “GEMBus as a Service Oriented Platform for Cloud-Based Composable Services”, 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, Nov. 1, 2011, pp. 666-671. |
Hermann, Jeremy et al., “Meet Michelangelo: Uber's Machine Learning Platform”, Uber Engineering, https://eng.uber.com/michelangelo-machine-learning-platform/ Sep. 5, 2017, pp. 1-17. |
Hoare, Suchismita et al. “A Semantic-Agent Framework for PaaS Interoperability”, 2016 International IEEE Conferences on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced and Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing and Communications, Cloud and Big Data Computing, Internet of People, and Smart World Congress, Jul. 18, 2016, pp. 788-793. |
Jain, Paras et al., “Dynamic Space-Time Scheduling for GPU Inference”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of California, Berkeley; http://learningsys.org/nips18/assets/papers/102CameraReadySubmissionGPU_Virtualization%20(8).pdf 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Dec. 31, 2018, pp. 1-8. |
Khaddar, Ajana El M. et al., “Smartphone: the Ultimate IoT and IoE Device”, IntechOpen, “Smartphones from an Applied Research Perspective”, pp. 137-162 (Ch. 7), Nov. 2, 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69734, pp. all. |
Lacoste, M. et al., “User-Centric Security and Dependability in the Clouds-of-Clouds”, IEEE Cloud Computing, Sep. 2016, 64-75. |
Li, Li E. et al., “Scaling Machine Learning as a Service”, Uber Technologies, Inc., JMLR: Workshop and Conference Proceeding, http://proceedings.mlr.press/v67/li17a/li17a.pdf 2016, pp. 16-29. |
Mahajan, Kshiteej et al. “Themis: Fair and Efficient GPU Cluster Scheduling”, Cornell University, ARXIV:1907.01484 [CS.DC], Published Oct. 29, 2019, 15 pages. |
Muumbi, Rashid et al., “Learning Algorithms for Dynamic Resource Allocation in Virtualised Networks”, Universitat Polit'ecnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain, Publication date unknown, 4 pages. |
Rafique, Ansar et al., “Towards Portability and Interoperability Support in Middleware for Hybrid Clouds”, 2014 IEEE INFOCOM Workshop on Cross-Cloud Systems, Apr. 27, 2014, pp. 7-12. |
Sun, Peng et al., “Towards Distributed Machine Learning in Shared Clusters: A Dynamically-Partitioned Approach”, Cornell University: ARXIV: 1704.06738V1 [CS.CD], Published Apr. 22, 2017, 6 pages. |
Warburton, Tim , “An Intro to GPU Architecture and Programming Models I Tim Warburton, Virginia Tech”, YouTube, Argonne National Laboratory Training, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGmPv8xoT4E Sep. 25, 2017, pp. 1-3. |
“VMware Workspace One Access: Feature Walk-through”, YouTube | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGQRUe2vKWs, Feb. 19, 2020, pp. 1. |
“vSphere With Tanzu—Networking with vSphere Distributed Switch.”, YouTube | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pl65Kn9AKk, Sep. 16, 2020, pp. 1. |
Benson, Mark , “Technical Introduction to VMware Unified Access Gateway for Horizon Secure Remote Access”, VMWare | https://blogs.vmware.com/euc/2015/09/what-is-vmware-unified-access-gateway-secure-remote-access.html, Sep. 9, 2015, pp. 8. |
Colbert, Kit , “Announcing VMware vSphere with Tanzu: The Fastest Way to Get Started with Kubernetes”, VMWare | https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2020/09/announcing-vsphere-with-tanzu.html, Sep. 15, 2020, pp. 7. |
Foley, Mike , “vSphere 7—Introduction to the vSphere Pod Service”, VMWare | https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2020/04/vsphere-7-vsphere-pod-service.html, Apr. 9, 2020, pp. 8. |
Hagoort, Niels , “vSphere 7—A Closer Look at the VM DRS Score”, VMWare | https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2020/05/vsphere-7-a-closer-look-at-the-vm-drs-score.html, May 21, 2020, pp. 8. |
Hagoort, Niels , “vSphere 7—Assignable Hardware”, VMWare | https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2020/03/vsphere-7-assignable-hardware.html, Mar. 31, 2020, pp. 7. |
Hagoort, Niels , “vSphere 7—Improved DRS”, VMWare | https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2020/03/vsphere-7-improved-drs.html, Mar. 25, 2020, pp. 8. |
Handy, Alex , “Using a Citrix ADC for the OpenShift Control Plane”, Red Hat | https://cloud.redhat.com/blog/using-a-citrix-adc-for-the-openshift-control-plane, Oct. 6, 2020, pp. 5. |
Iyengar, Ashok , “Analytics at the Edge”, https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/analytics-at-the-edge, Jun. 8, 2020, pp. 1-13. |
Iyengar, Ashok , “Architecting at the Edge”, https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/architecting-at-the-edge, Oct. 21, 2019, pp. 1-14. |
Iyengar, Ashok , et al., “Architectural Decisions at the Edge”, https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/architectural-decisions-at-the-edge, Jul. 26, 2019, pp. 1-16. |
Iyengar, Ashok , et al., “Automation at the Edge”, https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/automation-at-the-edge, Feb. 18, 2017, pp. 1-13. |
Iyengar, Ashok , “Cloud at the Edge”, https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/cloud-at-the-edge, Feb. 26, 2019, pp. 1-9. |
Iyengar, Ashok , “DevOps at the Edge”, https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/devops-at-the-edge, Dec. 3, 2015, pp. 1-13. |
Iyengar, Ashok , “GitOps at the Edge”, https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/gitops-at-the-edge, Nov. 2, 2017, pp. 1-13. |
Iyengar, Ashok , et al., “Models Deployed at the Edge”, https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/models-deployed-at-the-edge, Mar. 30, 2020, pp. 1-17. |
Iyengar, Ashok , “Policies at the Edge”, https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/policies-at-the-edge, Jan. 22, 2020, pp. 1-13. |
Iyengar, Ashok , et al., “Rounding Out the Edges”, https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/rounding-out-the-edges, May 7, 2019, pp. 1-11. |
Iyengar, Ashok , “Security at the Edge”, https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/security-at-the-edge, May 12, 2020, pp. 1-17. |
Lee, Brandon , “What is VMware vSphere 7 Assignable Hardware?”, https://www.virtualizationhowto.com/2020/06/what-is-vmware-vsphere-7-assignable-hardware/, Jun. 25, 2020, pp. 8. |
McConville, Anton , et al., “A brief history of Kubernetes, OpenShift, and IBM”, IBM Developer Blog | https://developer.ibm.com/blogs/a-brief-history-of-red-hat-openshift/, Aug. 1, 2019, pp. 9. |
Menezes, Alexandre , “Introduction to Security Contexts and SCCs”, Red Hat | https://cloud.redhat.com/blog/introduction-to-security-contexts-and-sccs, Mar. 16, 2020, p. 7. |
Paladi, Nicolae , et al., “Domain Based Storage Protection with Secure Access Control for the Cloud”, https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2600075.2600082, 2014, pp. 35-42. |
Rosoff, Jared , “Project Pacific—Technical Overview”, VMWare | https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2019/08/project-pacific-technical-overview.html, Aug. 26, 2019, pp. 7. |
Sahu, Aditya , “The Fast Lane for Data Transfer—Paravirtual RDMA(PVRDMA) Support for Native Endpoints.”, VMWare | https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2020/10/para-virtual-rdma-support-for-native-endpoints.html, Oct. 15, 2020, pp. 7. |
Tamura, Yoshi , “GPUs as a service with Kubernetes Engine are now generally available”, Google Cloud | https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/gpus-service-kubernetes-engine-are-now-generally-available, Jun. 19, 2018, pp. 5. |
West, Michael , “vSphere With Tanzu—Getting Started with vDS Networking Setup”, VMWare | https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2020/10/vsphere-with-tanzu-the-fastest-way-to-deliver-kubernetes-on-vsphere.html, Oct. 8, 2020, pp. 8. |
Wiggers, Steef-Jan , “Google Kubernetes Engine 1.10 Is Generally Available and Enterprise Ready”, InfoQ | https://www.infoq.com/news/2018/06/google-kubernetes-engine-1.10-ga, Jun. 1, 2018, pp. 4. |
Beguelin, Daniel “Turn Your Smartphone Into an IoT Device”, IBM Developer https://developer.IBM.com/tutorials/iot-mobile-phone-iot-device-bluemix-apps-trs/, Nov. 10, 2015, pp. 1-12. |
“From Pilot to Production: Secure Workspace IoT Endpoint Management at Scale”, VMWare, Inc. https://www.vmware.com/products/workspace-one/workspace-iot.html, pp. 1-3. |
Stoks, Jessie , “Workspace IoT Series: How Industry 4.0 Will Transform Your Mobile Strategy”, VMware End-User Computing Blog https://blogs.vmware.com/euc/2019/02/workspace-iot-mobile-strategy.html, Feb. 20, 2019, pp. 1-5. |
Cano, Ignacio et al. “Curator: Self-Managing Storage for Enterprise Clusters”; University of Washington; published Mar. 2017; pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Sep. 1, 2020), from https://nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Sep. 17, 2019), from https:/nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven “The Nutanix Bible” (Jul. 25, 2019), from https://nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Mar. 2, 2020), from https://nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Jan. 11, 2014), from http:/stevenpoitras.com/the-nutanix-bible/ (Publication date based on indicated capture date by Archive.org; first publication date unknown), pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Jan. 12, 2016), from https://nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Oct. 15, 2013), from http://stevenpoitras.com/the-nutanix-bible/ (Publication date based on indicated capture date by Archive.org; first publication date unknown), pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Jun. 20, 2014), from http://stevenpoitras.com/the-nutanix-bible/ (Publication date based on indicated capture date by Archive.org; first publication date unknown), pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Jun. 25, 2018), from https://nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Jan. 3, 2017), from https://nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Jan. 3, 2018), from https://nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Sep. 4, 2015), from https://nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Jan. 7, 2015), from http://stevenpoitras.com/the-nutanix-bible/ (Publication date based on indicated capture date by Archive.org; first publication date unknown), pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Jan. 8, 2019), from https://nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Jun. 8, 2017), from https://nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven. “The Nutanix Bible” (Jun. 9, 2015), from http://stevenpoitras.com/the-nutanix-bible/ (Publication date based on indicated capture date by Archive.org; first publication date unknown), pp. all. |
Poitras, Steven, “The Nutanix Bible” (Jun. 9, 2016), from https://nutanixbible.com/ pp. all. |
“Architecting VMware Unified Access Gateway”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URSdJ9qCQKo&t=234s, Apr. 17, 2019, pp. 1. |
“AWS Architecture Monthly—Internet of Things Jun. 2019”, AWS | https://d1.awsstatic.com/whitepapers/architecture-monthly/AWS-Architecture-Monthly-June-2019.pdf, Jun. 2019. |
“AWS IoT Greengrass”, https://web.archive.org/web/20190624094650/https:/aws.amazon.com/greengrass/, Jun. 2019, pp. 1-13. |
“AWS IoT vs. Google IoT vs. Azure IoT”, Bizety | https://www.bizety.com/2018/08/28/aws-iot-vs-google-iot-vs-azure-ot/, Aug. 28, 2018, pp. 1-7. |
“Azure IoT Central intro walkthrough”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G32stXSwtyA&ab_channel=MicrosoftDeveloper, Feb. 2018. |
“Cloud IoT Core”, https://web.archive.org/web/20190129000453/https:/cloud.google.com/iot-core/, Jan. 2019, pp. 1-10. |
“Cloud IoT Core—Devices, configuration, and state”, Google | https://web.archive.org/web/20190330153113/https://cloud.google.com/iot/docs/concepts/devices, Mar. 2019. |
“Cloud IoT Core Private Beta”, Google | https://web.archive.org/web/20170518022234/https://cloud.google.com/iot-core/, May 2017. |
“Comprehensive Guide on Upgrading PKS”, PKS 1.3 https://kb.vmware.com/sfc/servlet.shepherd/version/download/068f4000009EfWPAAO, Apr. 2019, pp. 1-45. |
“Deploying and Configuring VMware Unified Access Gateway”, VMware | Unified Access Gateway 3.1 https://techzone.vmware.com/configuring-edge-services-vmware-unified-access-gateway-vmware-workspace-one-operational-tutorial#overview, Oct. 27, 2017, pp. 1-89. |
“Extended offline operation with Azure IoTEdge”, Microsoft | https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/extended-offline-operation-with-azure-iot-edge/, Sep. 2018. |
“Extract, Transform, Load with AWS IoT Greengrass Solution Accelerator”, AWS | https://aws.amazon.com/iot/solutions/etl-accelerator/, Oct. 2019, pp. 1-6. |
“Google Cloud IoT Core”, Google | https://www.slideshare.net/idof/google-cloud-iot-core, Sep. 2018. |
“Introducing Google Cloud IoT Core: forsecurely connecting and managing IoTdevices at scale”, Google Cloud | https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/introducing-google-cloud-iot-core-for-securely-connecting-and-managing-iot-devices-at-scale, May 2017. |
“IoT Core device-to-device communication”, Google |https://cloud.google.com/community/tutorials/iot-device-to-device, Dec. 2017. |
“IoT Partner Quickstart”, https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/iot_partner_quickstart1.0.pdf, Nov. 15, 2018, pp. 1-13. |
“Meeting at the Edge with VMware Internet of Things (IoT)”, https://blogs.vmware.com/edge/files/2017/04/Meeting-at-the-Edge.pdf, Apr. 2017, pp. 1-9. |
“Microsoft Azure IoT Reference Architecture”, Version 2.0 Release, May 2, 2018, pp. 1-79. |
“Microsoft IoT Central delivers low-code wayto build IoT solutions fast”, Microsoft | https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/microsoft-iot-central-delivers-low-code-way-to-build-iot-solutions-fast/, Dec. 2017. |
“Mobile Content Management”, VMWare | https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/workspace-one/vmware-airwatch-mcm-datasheet.pdf, Dec. 2019, pp. 1-4. |
“Release Notes for VMware Unified Access Gateway 3.1 and 3.1.1”, https://docs.vmware.com/en/Unified-Access-Gateway/3.1/rn/unified_access_gateway-31-release-notes.html, Oct. 27, 2017, pp. 1-4. |
“What is AWS IoT?”, AWS | Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAp6FHbhYCk&ab_channel=AmazonWebServices; Timestamp 4:55/10:08, Jan. 2018. |
“What is IoT Edge?”, Code Project | https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1261285/What-is-IoT-Edge, Sep. 2018, pp. 1-9. |
Avram, Abel , “AWS Greengrass Runs Lambda Functions on IoT Devices”, InfoQ | https://www.infoq.com/news/2017/06/aws-greengrass/, Jun. 8, 2017, pp. 1-2. |
Banka, Roank , “Pivotal CloudFoundry on Google cloud platform”, Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/RonakBanka/pcfgcpgoogleioextended, Jul. 16, 2018, pp. 1-44. |
Chi, Chrissie , “Enabling more device management scenarios with new features in IoT Hub”, Microsoft Azure | https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/enabling-more-device-management-scenarios-with-new-features-in-iot-hub/, May 7, 2018, pp. 1-6. |
Lobo, Savia , “Microsoft Azure IoT Edge is open source and generally available!”, PacktHub | https://hub.packtpub.com/microsoft-azure-iot-edge-is-open-source-and-generally-available/, Jun. 29, 2018, pp. 1-2. |
Msv, Janakiram , “5 Reasons Why Azure IoT Edge Is Industry's Most Promising Edge Computing Platform”, Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv/2018/07/01/5-reasons-why-azure-iot-edge-is-industrys-most-promising-edge-computing-platform/?sh=56b9ef223249, Jul. 2, 2018, pp. 1-5. |
Msv, Janakiram , “Azure IoT Edge: A Technology Primer”, TheNewsStack | https://thenewstack.io/azure-iot-edge-a-technology-primer/, Sep. 14, 2018, pp. 1-9. |
Oleniczak, Kevin , “Using AWS IoT for Predictive Maintenance”, AWS | https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/iot/using-aws-iot-for-predictive-maintenance/, Jun. 28, 2018, pp. 1-6. |
Param, Sunil , “Google's Coral: A new product development platform with local AI”, TechGig | https://content.techgig.com/technology/googles-coral-a-new-product-development-platform-with-local-ai/articleshow/69042955.cms, Apr. 26, 2019, pp. 1-18. |
Rhee, Injong , “Bringing intelligence to the edge with Cloud IoT”, Google Cloud | https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/bringing-intelligence-edge-cloud-iot, Jul. 25, 2018, pp. 1-7. |
Vanderzyden, John , “Using AWS Greengrass to Enable IoT Edge Computing”, mabl | https://www.mabl.com/blog/using-aws-greengrass-enable-iot-edge-computing, Aug. 23, 2017, pp. 1-12. |
Wiggers, Kyle , “Microsoft launches Azure IoT Edge out of preview”, VentureBeat | https://venturebeat.com/mobile/microsoft-launches-azure-iot-edge-out-of-preview/, Jun. 27, 2018, pp. 1-6. |
Yamashita, Teppei , “Real-time data processing with IoT Core”, Google Cloud | https://cloud.google.com/community/tutorials/cloud-iot-rtdp, Apr. 2018, pp. 1-19. |
Zhang, Xinyi , “Create a CI/CD pipeline for your IoT Edge solution with Azure DevOps”, Microsoft | https://devblogs.microsoft.com/iotdev/create-a-ci-cd-pipeline-for-your-iot-edge-solution-with-azure-devops/, Oct. 29, 2018, pp. 1-10. |
“Available Supporting Components”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.1/architecture/understanding-development.html#supporting-components retrieved May 27, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 4.1 general availability Jun. 4, 2019, pp. 1-2. |
“Comprehensive Guide on Upgrading PKS”, PKS 1.3, Apr. 2019, pp. 1-45. |
“Enabling Monitoring for User-defined Projects”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.6/monitoring/enabling-monitoring-for-user-defined-projects.html retrieved May 24, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 4.6 general avaibility Oct. 27, 2020, pp. 1-13. |
“How to adopt a multi-cluster strategy for your applications in Anthos”, YouTube | Google Cloud Tech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhF-rTXq-Us&list=PLlivdWyY5sqKN73vzKpg2p2JmOGoAN0CG&index=6, May 29, 2020, pp. 1. |
“How to get started with Anthos on Google Cloud”, YouTube | Google Cloud Tech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghFiaz7juoA&list=PLlivdWyY5sqKN73vzKpg2p2JmOGoAN0CG&index=4, Apr. 30, 2020, pp. 1. |
“How to Troubleshoot PKS Upgrade Issues”, VMware Tanzu Supprt Hub https://community.pivotal.io/s/article/how-to-troubleshoot-pks-upgrade-issues?language=en_US, Jul. 17, 2019, pp. 1-11. |
“Installation and Update OpenShift Container Platform Installation Overview”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.5/architecture/architecture-installation.html retrieved May 24 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 4.5 general availability Jul. 13, 2020, pp. 1-17. |
“Journey to OpenShift in a Multi-Cloud Environment, Part 3”, RedHat Hybrid Cloud | Blog https://cloud.redhat.com/blog/journey-openshift-multi-cloud-environment-part-3, Jan. 2, 2018, pp. 1-4. |
“Managing Metrics”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.6/monitoring/managing-metrics.html#/managing-metrics retrieved May 24, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 4.6 general availability Oct. 27, 2020, pp. 1-14. |
“Migrating Kubernetes apps to Serverless with Cloud Run on Anthos”, YouTube | Google Cloud Tech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0T5UliS9j8A, Nov. 19, 2019, pp. 1 |
“Monitoring Project and Application Metrics Using the Developer Perspective”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.9/applications/odc-monitoring-project-and-application-metrics-using-developer-perspective.html#monitoring-project-and-application-metrics-using-developer-perspective retrieved May 24, 2022 relevant to, OpenShift 4.9 general availability Oct. 18, 2020, pp. 1-7. |
“New Technology Projection: The Total Economic Impact of Anthos”, A Forrester Total Economic Impact https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/the_total_economic_impact_of_anthos.pdf?mkt_tok=ODA4LUdKVy0zMTQAAAGEowKcUaDaTyTRyP0murezYOwrjB4GihzmPwbs7d0qMaMhJZtax3Of12Gx2-HRDm4SifQME2gL7297yUgZ3FEMxg5UdUp3eFaN5j_Oie7D0ta28s, Nov. 2019, pp. 1-26. |
“Observing Environments”, https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_advanced_cluster_management_for_kubernetes/2.1/html-single/observing_environments/index retrieved May 24, 2022 relevant to Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.1, general availability Nov. 5, 2020, pp. 1-16. |
“OpenShift Container Platform Architecture”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.5/architecture/architecture.html retrieved May 24, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 4.5 general availability Jul. 13, 2020, pp. 1-10. |
“OpenShift Container Platform Architecture”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.1/architecture/architecture.html retrieved May 27, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 4.1 general availability Jun. 4, 2019, pp. 1-11. |
“OpenShift Container Platform cluster monitoring, logging, and Telemetry”, RedHat https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.2/html/container-native_virtualization/container-native-virtualization-user-s-guide#cnv-openshift-cluster-monitoring, Oct. 16, 2019, pp. 1-7. |
“OpenShift Container Platform installation overview”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.1/architecture/architecture-installation.html retrieved May 27 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 4.1 general availability Jun. 4, 2019, pp. 1-13. |
“Overview: OpenShift Container Platform”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/getting_started/index.html retrieved May 24 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 general availability Oct. 2018, pp. 1-2. |
“Overview: OpenShift v3”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/architecture/index.html retrieved May 24, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 general availability Oct. 2018, pp. 1-9. |
“Overview: Templates”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/dev_guide/templates.html retrieved May 24, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 general availability Oct. 2018, pp. 1-27. |
“Pivotal CF 1.3 App Dashboard and Usage Reports”, YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpGUbjh8IUY, Sep. 25, 2014, pp. 1. |
“Pivotal Cloud Foundry Documentation”, Pivotal Version 2.0 https://resources.docs.pivotal.io/pdfs/pcf-docs-2.0.pdf, Dec. 20, 2018, pp. 1-1591. |
“Pivotal Container Service (PKS)”, Pivotal Version 1.2 https://resources.docs.pivotal.io/pdfs/pks-1-2.pdf, Sep. 3, 2019, pp. 1-323. |
“Pivotal Container Service Overview”, Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Pivotal/pivotal-container-service-overview, Jul. 16, 2019, pp. 1-78. |
“Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS (RHCOS)”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.1/architecture/architecture-rhcos.html retrieved May 27, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 4.1 general availability Jun. 4, 2019, pp. 1-16. |
“Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS (RHCOS)”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.5/architecture/architecture-rhcos.html retrieved May 24, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 4.5 general availability Jul. 13, 2020, pp. 1-19. |
“Service Catalog”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/architecture/service_catalog/index.html retrieved May 24, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 general availability Oct. 2018, pp. 1-9. |
“Template Service Broker”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/architecture/service_catalog/template_service_broker.html retrieved May 24, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 3.9 general availability Oct. 2018, pp. 1-2. |
“The Service Mesh Era: Architecting, Securing and Managing Microservices with Istio”, Google Cloud https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/the_service_mesh_era_architecting_securing_and_managing_microservices_with_istio_white_paper.pdf, Feb. 5, 2019, pp. 1-40. |
“The Service Mesh Era: Architecting, Securing and Managing Microservices with Istio”, Google Cloud https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/the_service_mesh_era_architecting_securing_and_managing_microservices_with_istio_white_paper.pdf, Mar. 6, 2019, pp. 6-40. |
“The Service Mesh Era: Architecting, Securing and Managing Microservices with Istio”, Google Cloud https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/the_service_mesh_era_architecting_securing_and_managing_microservices_with_istio_white_paper.pdf, Jan. 22, 2019, pp. 1-40. |
“Understanding OpenShift Container Platform development”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.5/architecture/understanding-development.html retrieved May 24, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 4.5 general availability Jul. 13, 2020, pp. 1-17. |
“Understanding OpenShift Container Platform development”, https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.1/architecture/understanding-development.html retrieved May 27, 2022 relevant to OpenShift Container Platform 4.1 general availability Jun. 4, 2019, pp. 1-18. |
“VMware Announces VMware Tanzu Portfolio to Transform the Way Enterprises Build, Run and Manage Software on Kubernetes”, VMware News & Stories https://news.vmware.com/releases/vmware-announces-vmware-tanzu-portfolio-to-transform-the-way-enterprises-build-run-and-manage-software-on-kubernetes, Aug. 26, 2019, pp. 1-11. |
“VMware Enterprise PKS Architecture Overview”, YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=504FGHukY8Y, Feb. 9, 2018, pp. 1. |
“VMware Tanzu Mission Control Demo”, YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7m9S4HilJlo, Aug. 28, 2019, pp. 1. |
“What is Anthos Service Mesh?”, Google Cloud | Anthos Service Mesh 1.4 https://cloud.google.com/service-mesh/v1.4/docs/overview, Dec. 20, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Balkan, Ahmet Alp, “What's new in Cloud Run for Anthos”, Google Cloud https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/serverless/new-features-in-cloud-run-for-anthos-ga, Dec. 11, 2019, pp. 1-7. |
Banka, Roank , “Pivotal CloudFoundry on Google cloud platform”, Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Pivotal/pivotal-container-service-overview, Jul. 16, 2018, pp. 1-44. |
Ben-David, Jacob , “Google Cloud's Anthos—Everything You Need To Know”, Turbonomic Blog https://blog.turbonomic.com/google-clouds-anthos, Apr. 15, 2019, pp. 1-9. |
Goodison, Donna , “Google Cloud Unleashes Managed Service Mesh, Serverless for Anthos”, The Channel Co. CRN https://www.crn.com/news/cloud/google-cloud-unleashes-managed-service-mesh-serverless-for-anthos, Sep. 16, 2019, pp. 1-6. |
Holzle, Urs , et al., “Introducing Anthos: An entirely new platform for managing applications in today's multi-cloud world”, Google Cloud https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/hybrid-cloud/new-platform-for-managing-applications-in-todays-multi-cloud-world, Apr. 9, 2019, pp. 1-7. |
Islam, Tariq , et al., “5 frequently asked questions about Google Cloud Anthos”, Google Cloud https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/hybrid-cloud/5-frequently-asked-questions-about-google-cloud-anthos, Jun. 20, 2019, pp. 1-5. |
Lin, Jennifer , et al., “Anthos simplifies application modernization with managed service mesh and serverless for your hybrid cloud”, Google Cloud https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/hybrid-cloud/anthos-simplifies-application-modernization-with-managed-service- mesh-and-serverless-for-your-hybrid cloud, Sep. 16, 2019, pp. 1-6. |
Malasi, Aman , “Google Anthos: Write Once, Run Anywhere”, HCL Tech Blogs https://www.hcltech.com/blogs/google-anthos-write-once-run-anywhere, Aug. 26, 2019, pp. 1-2. |
McLuckie, Craig , “Introducing VMware Tanzu Mission Control to Bring Order to Cluster Chaos”, VMware Tanzu https://tanzu.vmware.com/content/blog/introducing-vmware-tanzu-mission-control-to-bring-order-to-cluster-chaos, Aug. 26, 2019, pp. 1-6. |
O'Keefe, Megan , “Welcome to the service mesh era: Introducing a new Istio blog post series”, Google Cloud https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/networking/welcome-to-the-service-mesh-era-introducing-a-new-istio-blog-post-series, Jan. 22, 2019, pp. 1-5. |
Reid, Nate , “Upgrading VMware Enterprise PKS 1.2 to 1.3”, YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pAxNWIxVLM, Jan. 28, 2019, pp. 1. |
Schonbaum, Iftach , “Anthos—Google's Enterprise Hybrid & Multi-Cloud Platform”, CloudZone https://medium.com/cloudzone/anthos-googles-enterprise-hybrid-multi-cloud-platform-7975e05a7729, Apr. 23, 2019, pp. 1-7. |
[Published as US-2023-0070811-A1] U.S. Appl. No. 17/932,235 titled “Apparatus and Method for Depoying a Mobile Device as a Data Source in an IoT System” filed Sep. 14, 2022. |
[Published as US-2023-0141808-A1] U.S. Appl. No. 18/047,623 titled “Common Services Model for Multi-Cloud Platform” filed Oct. 18, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/185,300 titled “Scalable Centralized Manager Including Examples of Data Pipeline Deployment to an Edge System” filed Mar. 26, 2023. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/321,678 titled “Generic Proxy Endpoints Using Protocol Tunnels Including Life Cyclemanagement and Examples for Distributed Cloud Native Services Andapplications” filed May 22, 2023. |
“Cloud, Fog and Edge Computing—What's the Difference?”, https://www.winsystems.com/cloud-fog-and-edge-computing-whats-the-difference/, Dec. 4, 2017, pp. 1-10. |
“IoT: Understanding the shift from cloud to edge computing”, https://internetofbusiness.com/shift-from-cloud-to-edge-computing/, Aug. 14, 2018, pp. 1-9. |
Angelas, “Java Heap Space vs. Stack Memory: How Java Applications Allocate Memory”, stackify.com, Sep. 5, 2017, pp. 1-3. |
“Neo-AI-DLR is a common runtime for machine learning models compiled by AWS SageMaker Neo, TVM, or TreeLite.”, GitHub | https://github.com/neo-ai/neo-ai-dlr, Dec. 1, 2020, pp. 1-4. |
“Unified Access Gateway Architecture”, https://techzone.vmware.com/resource/unified-access-gateway-architecture, Nov. 2020, pp. 1-18. |
Al, Yuan , et al., “Edge computing technologies for Internet of Things: a primer”, Digital Communications and Networks 4 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2017.07.001, 2018, pp. 77-86. |
Beltre, Angel , et al., “Enabling HPC workloads on Cloud Infrastructure using Kubernetes Container Orchestration Mechanisms”, 2019 IEEE/ACM Workshop on Containers and New Orchestration Paradigms for Isolated Environments In HPC (CANOPIEHPC), 2019, pp. 11-20. |
Harnik, Danny , et al., “Secure Access Mechanism for Cloud Storage”, vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 317-336. [Retrieved from internet on Feb. 14, 2023], <https://scpe.org/index.php/scpe/article/view/727>, 2011, pp. 317-336. |
Iyengar, Ashok , et al., “5G at the Edge”, https://www.IBM.com/cloud/blog/5g-at-the-edge, Nov. 12, 2020, pp. 1-13. |
O'Keefe, Megan , “Edge Computing and the Cloud-Native Ecosystem”, TheNewStack | https://thenewstack.io/edge-computing-and-the-cloud-native-ecosystem/, Apr. 18, 2018, pp. 1-11. |
Ren, Ju , et al., “Edge Computing for the Internet of Things”, IEEE Journals & Magazine | vol. 32 Issue: 1, 2008, pp. 1-6. |
Warke, Amit , et al., “Storage Service Orchestration with Container Elasticity”, 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing DOI 10.1109/CIC.2018.00046, 2018, pp. 283-292. |
Zhao, Zhuoran , et al., “DeepThings: Distributed Adaptive Deep Learning Inference on Resource-Constrained IoT Edge Clusters”, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 37, No. 11 | doi: 10.1109/TCAD.2018.2858384., Nov. 2018, pp. 2348-2359. |
Poitras, Steven , “The Nutanix Bible”, https://nutanixbible.com/, Apr. 9, 2019, pp. all. |
“API Quick Reference”, https://web.archive.org/web/20201021193437/https:/docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-Tanzu-Service-Mesh/services/api-programming-guide/GUID-6C5044B8-6950-42A6-87A5-3D88BEAE09DB.html, Oct. 2020, pp. 5. |
“Backup & Secure”, USGS, 2018. |
“Cascade Mode Deployment”, https://docs.vmware.com/en/Unified-Access-Gateway/3.10/com.vmware.uag-310-deploy-config. doc/GUID-AWT-DEPLOYMENT-CASCADE.html#GUID-AWT-DEPLOYMENT-CASCADE, Jul. 2, 2019, pp. 2. |
“Mobile Content Management—Datasheet”, https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/workspace-one/vmware-airwatch-mcm-datasheet.pdf, Mar. 12, 2019, pp. 4. |
“Runtime System”, Wikipedia, 2018. |
“Tunnel Architecture”, https://techzone.vmware.com/resource/workspace-one-uem-architecture#tunnel-architecture, Nov. 2020, p. 34. |
“Unified App Catalog”, https://techzone.vmware.com/resource/workspace-one-uem-architecture#unified-app-catalog, Nov. 2020, p. 21. |
“Using the Workspace ONE UEM REST API to Extend Device Compliance Parameters”, https://techzone.vmware.com/resource/workspace-one-uem-architecture#using-the-workspace-one-uem-rest-api-to-extend-device-compliance-parameters, Nov. 2020, p. 23. |
“VMware Identity Manager API”, https://developer.vmware.com/apis/57/#api, Aug. 2018, pp. 2. |
“VMware Tanzu Service Mesh built on VMware NSX”, VMware | https://www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/docs/vmw-tanzu-service-mesh-solution-brief.pdf, Mar. 2020, pp. 3. |
“VMware Tanzu Service Mesh Documentation”, VMware Tanzu Service Mesh | https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-Tanzu-Service-Mesh/index.html, Aug. 2020, pp. 2. |
“VMware Tunnel”, https://techzone.vmware.com/resource/workspace-one-uem-architecture#vmware-tunnel, Nov. 2020, p. 34. |
“VMware Tunnel (Per-App VPN) Connections in Cascade Mode”, https://docs.vmware.com/en/Unified-Access-Gateway/3.10/com.vmware.uag-310-deploy-config.doc/GUID-B69DD1E7-ED88-4574-912C-DBA071BC9D6F.html, May 31, 2019, pp. 2. |
“VMware Unified Access Gateway: Use Cases—Feature Walk-through”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaN9mYOJqAs, Oct. 27, 2017, pp. 1. |
“Workspace ONE UEM 1810 introduces support for Android Enterprise fully managed devices with work profiles”, https://bayton.org/blog/2018/10/workspace-one-uem-1810-introduces-support-for-android-enterprise-fully-managed-devices-with-work-profiles/, Oct. 29, 2018, pp. 11. |
Bayton, Jason , “Android Enterprise COPE enrolment comparison: WS1 UEM / MI Core”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSJu3xFzjMw, Oct. 28, 2018, pp. 1. |
Coronado, Jose , “Deploying Tanzu Application Service for Kubernetes on Kind”, VMware Tanzu | https://vxcoronado.net/index.php/2020/05/31/deploying-tanzu-application-service-for-kubernetes-on-kind/, May 31, 2020, pp. 8. |
Rajiv, Srivastava , “Install Tanzu Build Service (TBS v1.0 GA) on Kubernetes—build docker image and store in DockerHub image registr”, https://cloudificationzone.com/2020/08/24/build-docker-image-using-tanzu-build-service-on-kubernetes-using-dockerhub/, Aug. 24, 2020, pp. 10. |
Schweighhardt, Mark , “VMware Tanzu Service Mesh, built on VMware NSX is Now Available!”, VMware | https://blogs.vmware.com/networkvirtualization/2020/03/vmware-tanzu-service-mesh-built-on-vmware-nsx-is-now-available.html/, Mar. 10, 2020, pp. 8. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/151,350 titled “Dynamic Allocation of Compute Resources at a Recovery Site” filed Jan. 6, 2023. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/956,036, titled “Dynamic Allocation of Compute Resources at a Recovery Site”, filed Apr. 18, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/191,377 titied “System and Method for the Dynamic Expansion of a Cluster With Co Nodes Before Upgrade”, filed Nov. 14, 2018; pp. all. |
Disaster Recovery: Ensuring High Availability for Mission-Critical Applications, VMware ,2015 , pp. 1-4. |
Dynamically Allocated Virtual Clustering Management System User's Guide, United States Army Research Laboratory www.arl.army.mil.www/default.cfm?page=2488 [retrieved Oct. 17, 2017], Retrieved from Internet Archive; pp. all Jun. 5, 2020, pp. all. |
Denneman,Frank et al., VMware Cloud on AWS—A Closer Look, VMware vSphere Blog; https://blog.vmware.com/vsphere/2016/10/vmware-cloud-on-aws-a-closer-look.html , Oct. 13, 2016 , pp. 1-6. |
Denneman,Frank et al., VMWare Cloud on AWS—Elastic DRS Preview, https://frankdenneman.nl/2016/10/18/vmware-cloud-aws-elastic-drs/ , Oct. 18, 2016 , pp. 1-4. |
Epping,D. et al., Scale Up/Out and impact of vRAM?!? (part 2), Yellow-Bricks.com [online], 2011 [retrieved May 9, 2020], Retrieved from internet: https://www.yellow-bricks.com/2011/07/21/scale-upout-and-impact-of-vram-part-2, May 9, 2020, pp. 1-6. |
Hodroj,Ali et al., Disaster Recovery on Demand, Cloudify | https://cloudify.co/blog/cloudifying-high-availability-part-2-disaster-recovery-on-demand/ , Sep. 16, 2013 , pp. 1-9. |
Miller,T. et al.,The Disaster Recovery Reality Check, https://www.cohesity.com/blogs/the-disaster-recovery-reality-check/, COHESITY, ,May 21, 2020 , pp. 1-3. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/930,885 titled “Platform-As-A-Service Deployment Including Service Domains” filed Oct. 29, 2024. |
“Google IoT Platform: Awesome Tools for Any Project”, https://indeema.com/blog/google-cloud, Feb. 20, 2019, pp. 1-9. |
“Microsoft Azure IoT Reference Architecture”, https://download.microsoft.com/download/A/4/D/A4DAD253-BC21-41D3-B9D9-87D2AE6F0719/Microsoft_Azure_IoT_Reference_Architecture.pdf, Sep. 26, 2018, pp. 18. |
“Setup Azure IoT Edge CI/CD Pipeline with ARM Agent”, https://devblogs.microsoft.com/iotdev/setup-azure-iot-edge-ci-cd-pipeline-with-arm-agent/, Nov. 13, 2018, pp. 1-11. |
“The Developer's Guide to Azure”, https://download.microsoft.com/download/2/C/F/2CF7401A-B9D7-4828-917D-199E0896BFE5/Azure_Developer_Guide_eBook.pdf, May 2019, pp. 64. |
Asanghanwa, Eustace , “Simplifying confidential computing: Azure IoT Edge security with enclaves—Public preview”, https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/simplifying-confidential-computing-azure-iot-edge-security-with-enclaves-public-preview/, Nov. 19, 2018, pp. 1-7. |
Barr, Jeff , “AWS Greengrass—Run AWS Lambda Functions on Connected Devices”, https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/category/aws-greengrass/, Jun. 7, 2017, pp. 1-18. |
Berdy, Nicole , “Azure IoT Hub message routing dramatically simplifies IoT solution development”, https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-iot-hub-message-routing-enhances-device-telemetry-and-optimizes-iot-infrastructure-resources/, Dec. 14, 2016. |
Decarlo, Paul , “Using Cognitive Services Containers with Azure IoT Edge”, https://dev.to/azure/using-cognitive-services-containers-with-azure-iot-edge-1e5a, May 18, 2019, pp. 1-15. |
Garcin-Beldowski, Sébastien , “AWS Greengrass the forefront of edge computing”, https://medium.com/smileinnovation/aws-greengrass-the-forefront-of-edge-computing-8ec2098a33b7, Dec. 14, 2018, pp. 1-18. |
George, Sam , “Azure IoT Edge generally available for enterprise-grade, scaled deployments”, https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-iot-edge-generally-available-for-enterprise-grade-scaled-deployments/, Jun. 27, 2018, pp. 1-5. |
Lawton, George , “With AWS Greengrass, IoT apps become seamless edge to cloud”, https://www.techtarget.com/iotagenda/feature/With-AWS-Greengrass-IoT-apps-become-seamless-edge-to-cloud, Jul. 16, 2018, pp. 1-7. |
Liu, Gus , “How to Install a Face Recognition Model at the Edge with AWS IoT Greengrass”, https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/iot/how-to-install-a-face-recognition-model-at-the-edge-with-aws-iot-greengrass/, Apr. 30, 2019, pp. 1-10. |
Rai, Rahul , “Building Applications with Azure IoT Edge”, https://thecloudblog.net/post/building-applications-with-azure-iot-edge/, Apr. 25, 2018, pp. 1-16. |
Rai, Rahul , “IoT Edge Device Monitoring and Management with Azure Durable Entities Functions—Part 1”, https://thecloudblog.net/post/iot-edge-device-monitoring-and-management-with-azure-durable-entities-functions-part-1/, Jul. 1, 2019, pp. 1-14. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220121543 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63094733 | Oct 2020 | US |