The technical field of the present disclosure relates to high-voltage switches having linear actuators.
Reactance injection into electric power transmission lines offers the opportunity to realize substantial improvements in overall system capacity and in system stability. However, there are some instances, when it becomes appropriate to eliminate the reactance injection totally and completely. These instances typically coincide with faults of one type or another. Grounding, short-circuiting or open circuiting are all types of faults that can devastate a system if not corrected or isolated. Injected reactance can confuse the localization of such faults. A fault might be more localized, like the loss of power or functionality of a reactance injecting apparatus. Since reactance injection systems generally operate in series with the flow of energy through the line, the surest way to eliminate their influence is to provide a switch that will bypass the reactance injecting module, either manually or automatically upon the system's discovery of a failure.
One component that allows the economical and efficient construction of a bypass switch is the vacuum interrupter. This is a component manufactured by many companies, including ABB, Eaton, GE, Siemens, and others. A representative pair of simplified cross sections appears in
While a vacuum is a nearly ideal environment for a high-power electrical switch, there are residual risks. Under some conditions of instantaneous voltage at the instant of the switch's closure and roughness of the contacts' surfaces, microscopic welded points may be formed between the fixed and movable contacts (130 in
Within the switch, the size and surface of the contacts 130 determine the switch's current handling characteristics. All other aspects of the switch or bypass switch performance are determined by the actuator, including the stroke that defines the operating voltage, the interrupter's resting condition, which is typically one of normally ON, normally OFF, or its most recent state.
To utilize a bypass switch in the context of a powerline reactance injector, the requirements of that application must be satisfied. The prescribed role of the interrupter is to activate the injector by having the switch open and to bypass the injector when the switch is closed. Thus, the passive state is “switch closed,” i.e., this application calls for a normally closed switch. Further, in the event of a power failure the actuator should place the interrupter in the passive “switch closed” state automatically without any signal or power. Finally, the typical operating conditions for a reactance injector require that the switch be open, and in this state, the actuator must operate at a low power level to minimize heating. Therefore, there is a need in the art for a solution which overcomes the drawbacks described above.
The subject matter that is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
It will be appreciated that the schematic drawings illustrate the principles of the invention without showing all structural elements, connectors or protective elements.
The activator described in this disclosure enables a bypass switch that satisfies these operational requirements and adds a level of reliability to the transition from contacts closed to contacts open.
There are several sections to a bypass switch, as illustrated in
The focus of the present disclosure is region 250, the activator. Its role is to move the drive rod 55 up or down in a controlled fashion according the electrical signals applied or not applied to the activator. This motion is applied to the movable end of the vacuum interrupter 225, opening, closing or holding the switch contacts (130 or 132 in
The final region in
The essence of the activator is illustrated in
The first magnetic (i.e., able to be magnetized) structure is the armature, shown here in two armature pieces 20 and 25. While
The other elements of the magnetic circuit in
The other key element in the magnetic configuration is the solenoid 40. This one coil is used both to open the interrupter and to hold it in the open position. In every instance the solenoid 40 is driven so its induced magnetic field is in the same direction as the field induced by the permanent magnet 45, e.g., a permanent magnet ring. The permanent magnet 45 and the solenoid 40 fields are additive. The solenoid 40 normally has several components, the most important of which are windings of wire, but there are connections, a bobbin, and insulation. These are commonly used and incidental to the activator operations being described.
The drive rod 55 is axially movable with respect to structural support members 17, 18, and 19, and movable with respect to the magnetic case 30 (e.g., a housing), the magnetic boss 35 and the solenoid 40. With the activator in the closed condition, with the drive rod 55 in its upward position, the force on the vacuum interrupter is established by the principal spring 60, which bears on the collar 56 of the drive rod 55. There is a second spring 70 that holds the armature 20, 25 in its upward, reset position. The upper portion of the armature, armature piece 20, is free to move along the drive rod 55, but its motion is limited at one extreme by contacting the collar 56, and at the other extreme it is limited by a stop 58 that is attached to or integrated with the drive rod 55.
The conditions illustrated in
In the open condition, illustrated again in
There are two extreme methods of maintaining the switch open condition illustrated in
Numerical examples contained in the following paragraphs are illustrative for a 15 KV, 2000 ampere vacuum switch, with a 65,000 ampere peak transient current rating. Higher ratings would generally require more force, stronger magnetics and more operating current.
This actuator uses a permanent magnet 45 only strong enough to provide 45% to 55% of the total force exerted by the springs 60 and 70, e.g., 3400 N. Holding the activator in the open position requires, in addition to the force of permanent magnet 45, the magnetomotive force of a current between 1 ampere and 3 amperes passing through the solenoid 40. Note that this current represents a solenoid power that is roughly 25% of the power required without the permanent magnet 45. More impressively, it is a very small fraction, approximately 0.3% of the power required during the transition from closed to open. These specific numbers are examples; smaller or larger switch vacuum interrupters would require less or more energy for transitions and holding, but the use of a permanent magnet significantly reduces the power necessary to hold the actuator in a contacts-open condition, additionally reducing the energy needed to drive the contacts from closed to open, albeit, to a lesser extent. The specific values of the currents are affected by the choice of the ferromagnetic materials, the number of turns in the solenoid, and the strength of the permanent magnets. It remains essential in some embodiments that the restraining force of the permanent magnet 45 is insufficient to hold the armature 20, 25 in its switch-open condition. There must be additional magnetic force from a holding current in the solenoid 40 to sustain the bypass switch in its open condition.
The transition from contacts closed to contacts open is addressed with the aid of
The net stroke applied to the vacuum interrupter is the total travel Y1 of the armature 20, 25 diminished by the pre-travel Y2. An example value of Y1 is 17 mm, and a representative value of Y2, pre-travel, is 10 mm. The net stroke applied to the vacuum switch is 7 mm in this example. The net stroke is a design parameter of the system, with longer strokes accommodating higher operating voltages for the switch and shorter strokes minimizing metal fatigue and extending the operating life of the vacuum switch.
If sheet materials are used, an additional bushing 23 may be used to protect the sheet edges from the motion relative to the drive rod 55 and the impact with the collar 56. Further, the rectangular geometry requires additional guiding so any incidental rotations of the armature 21 about the axis of the drive rod 55 are too small to affect the integrity of the magnetic circuits formed when the actuator is in its switch-open condition. The incidental rotations must also be confined to avoid having the armature 21 touch the solenoid 40 or any of its protective elements. The drive rod 55 and collar 56 must be centered in the armature 21 to avoid twisting during opening and closing operations.
In embodiments shown in
This application claims benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/858,904, titled “Kinetic Actuator for Vacuum Interrupter” and filed Jun. 7, 2019, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6156989 | Miller | Dec 2000 | A |
6326872 | Marchand | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6870451 | Inoue | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6930271 | Palmieri et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6952332 | Slade | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7280019 | Kolb et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
8466385 | Glaser | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8854165 | Irwin | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9183996 | Karlstrom | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9190234 | Reuber | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20020011147 | Tsubouchi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030089683 | Thuresson | May 2003 | A1 |
20040093718 | Takeuchi | May 2004 | A1 |
20050024174 | Kolb et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050067380 | Rhein | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060006146 | Prestini | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060197639 | Opfer et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060208591 | Lee | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070194872 | Pfister et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20120274428 | Reuber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120327549 | Chaly | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130009731 | Fong | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130307652 | Irwin | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140090965 | Leccia | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140327502 | Lammers | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150170857 | Reuber | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160181049 | Rallabandi | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170236663 | Jung | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20200066468 | Wang | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0354803 | Feb 1990 | EP |
2004086437 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Benke, James et al., “Medium Voltage Electro-Mechanical Linear Actuator Breaker”, Eaton, downloaded from https://www.eaton.com/content/dam/eaton/products/electrical-circuit-protection/medium-voltage-vacuum-circuit-breakers/mv-vcp-t-vacuum-circuit-breakers/medium-voltage-electro-mechanical-linear-actuator-breaker-ad01301002e.pdf, 5 pp. total, May 7, 2005. |
Dullni, Edgar et al., “A Vacuum Circuit-Breaker with Permanent Magnetic Actuator and Electronic Control”, ABB Calor Emag Mittelspannung GmbH, 5 pp. total, 1999. |
Pei, X. et al., “Fast operating moving coil actuator for a vacuum interrupter”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, pp. 1-10, Apr. 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62858904 | Jun 2019 | US |