Field
This invention relates generally to a mini self-defense missile (MSDM) system provided on an aircraft for destroying incoming threats and, more particularly, to an MSDM system provided on a high performance military aircraft that includes miniature precision guided missiles provided outside of a main weapons bay on the aircraft, where the system identifies and tracks potential incoming threats and deploys the guided miniature missiles to destroy the threats.
Discussion
Air superiority is an important aspect of modern day warfare, and can generally be obtained in a number of ways including aircraft stealth, precision weapons, advanced targeting technologies, etc. Modern day US tactical aircraft have been successful in countering enemy missiles through various technologies, such as shooting out chaff from the aircraft, towing decoys behind the aircraft, shooting flares from the aircraft, etc., all of which are intended to confuse or draw away the incoming missile threat. However, the ability to operate largely uncontested in a particular air space as a result of these and other capabilities has been continually eroded over time, where the capability to track and defeat missile threats is decreasing. Further, exclusive reliance on even higher levels of reduced observability will be insufficient to ensure unfettered freedom of operation in the future.
Technologies for engaging incoming missile threats using kinetic weapons that track the target is generally known in the art. More particularly, defense systems exist in the art that are able to acquire, track and engage offensive missiles intending to destroy ground-based targets. For example, the patriot missile system is a ground-based kinetic defense system that is able to acquire incoming missiles through radar detection and fire a patriot interceptor missile to engage the incoming missile threat, which is equipped with a missile guidance system. Course correction commands are transmitted to the missile guidance system from the ground-based defense system. A target acquisition system on the missile acquires the target and transmits acquisition data to the controller for further course correction calculations.
The following discussion of the embodiments of the invention directed to a mini self-defense missile (MSDM) system is merely exemplary in nature, and is in no way intended to limit the invention or its applications or uses. For example, the MSDM system will be discussed herein in connection with a high performance military aircraft. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the MSDM system may have application for any airborne platform, such as bombers, tankers, helicopters, corporate jets, etc.
The present invention proposes an anti-missile kinetic defense system deployable on an aircraft that includes a plurality of “mini” guided munitions or missiles employed solely for defensive purposes and fireable from one or more missile pods positioned on the aircraft, where the missile pods are separate from the main offensive weapons bay on the aircraft. The kinetic defense system can use sensors already available on the aircraft for object and threat detection. The missiles that are fired from the pod are guided to the incoming target threat so that the threat is destroyed at a safe distance from the aircraft.
The MSDM system 12 is a defensive kinetic weapons system that employs miniature precision guided munitions or missiles that are fired from the aircraft 10 to destroy incoming missiles or other objects intended to destroy the aircraft 10. The MSDM system 12 includes a plurality of missile pods 20 located at various locations on the aircraft 10. In this non-limiting example, the aircraft 10 includes six of the pods 20, although any number of the missile pods 20 may be applicable for the particular aircraft. Each of the pods 20 is shown in its retracted position on the aircraft 10 in
The system 12 includes a controller 32 for controlling the acquisition of the potential target and launching of the missiles 28. As mentioned above, the MSDM system 12 uses existing sensors on the aircraft 10 to detect incoming missile threats, and then launches the guided missiles 28 from the pods 20 to intercept and destroy the incoming missile target. In one embodiment, for example, an optical cueing sensor 34 on the aircraft 10 identifies an incoming target threat in a general location approaching the aircraft 10, and then a radar tracking sensor 36 tracks the target threat in response to a cue from the optical cueing sensor 34. Alternately, the tracking sensor could be an optical sensor.
The foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplary embodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from such discussion and from the accompanying drawings and claims that various changes, modifications and variations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2709947 | Woods | Jun 1955 | A |
3088404 | Brown | May 1963 | A |
4307650 | Kuesters et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4697764 | Hardy et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
6196496 | Moskovitz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6929214 | Ackleson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6980151 | Mohan | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7093798 | Whelan et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114428 | Lloyd | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7137599 | Sitzmann | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7377217 | Swanson | May 2008 | B2 |
7378626 | Fetterly | May 2008 | B2 |
7494090 | Leal et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506841 | Duden et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7523692 | Burns | Apr 2009 | B1 |
8049656 | Shani et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8205536 | Fisher | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8281697 | McCants, Jr. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8376277 | Costanza et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8809755 | Patel et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
20100326264 | Roemerman | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20140102288 | Yeshurun | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20160047628 | Kolanek | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Hackett, Willy, Wing Commander et al. Stealth, Sensor Fusion, Situational Understanding and Precision Attack: Is This the Right Answer to Balance of Force? Air Power, Rush Defense Systems Jun. 2010, pp. 50-55. |
Alkire, Brien et al. “Applications for Navy Unmanned Aircraft Systems” Report Document, 2010, 66 pgs. |