Patent Application
20220313781
Described herein are methods of diagnosing and treating delayed puberty using kisspeptin.
Idiopathic Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism (IHH) is a rare disorder due to absence of GnRH neurons or their regulatory neurocircuits in the hypothalamus. It results in deficient secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) as well as failure to achieve normal reproductive function by age 18. When accompanied by anosmia, IHH is referred to as Kallmann Syndrome (KS). Untreated, patients remain sexually infantile.
Children presenting with delayed puberty pose a vexing challenge for clinicians because of difficulty in predicting which children will eventually progress through puberty and which children will not (1,2). Some causes of delayed puberty are readily recognizable, such as primary gonadal insufficiency, anatomic lesions of the hypothalamic/pituitary region, and functional hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (i.e., physiologic suppression of the reproductive endocrine axis by chronic illness, stress, or negative energy balance). However, these conditions only account for delayed puberty in 36-47% of girls and 11-29% of boys presenting for pediatric endocrinology care (3-5). For the majority of girls and boys with delayed puberty, the provider is left with two potential diagnoses with markedly different outcomes: constitutional delay and IHH (1). Constitutional delay is a self-limited condition in which puberty starts late (or starts then stalls temporarily) but eventually begins and progresses to attainment of full adult reproductive endocrine function (6). In contrast, IHH is a pathologic disorder that requires treatment (7). Currently, there is no reliable method to prospectively distinguish constitutional delay from IHH.
Provided herein are methods of treating a subject who has a reproductive endocrine dysfunction, optionally pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism. The methods include administering a therapeutically effective amount of (i) a plurality of doses (e.g., at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more, e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6/day) of kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog and/or (ii) an opioid antagonist or mixed agonist-antagonist to the subject. Also provided herein are compositions comprising (i) a kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog and/or (ii) an opioid antagonist or mixed agonist-antagonist for use in a method of treating a subject who has pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism, the method comprising administering a plurality of doses of kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog and/or (ii) an opioid antagonist or mixed agonist-antagonist.
In some embodiments, the plurality of doses are administered at 1-6 hour intervals, preferably at 2-3 hour intervals, over at least 2-3 days and preferably over at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, or 12 months.
In some embodiments, each of the plurality of doses comprises a dose equivalent to 0.08-2.4 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, administered via intravenous bolus (WB), subcutaneous injection (SC), or via a pump.
In some embodiments, each of the plurality of doses comprises a dose equivalent to 0.2-0.3 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, preferably 0.24 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10.
In some embodiments, the plurality of doses comprises at least one supraphysiologic dose equivalent to 2.4-24 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10. In some embodiments, the at least one supraphysiologic dose is administered as a first dose, or first two or more doses, optionally all, of the plurality of doses.
In some embodiments, the methods include administering a therapeutically effective amount of an opioid antagonist or mixed agonist-antagonist to the subject. In some embodiments, the opioid antagonist is naloxone or naltrexone, or the mixed agonist-antagonist is buprenorphine.
In some embodiments, the methods further include administration of one or more gonadotropins (e.g., luteinizing hormone (LH) and/or follicle-stimulating hormone, (FSH)).
Also provided herein are methods for identifying a subject as having, being at risk for, or having an attenuated form of, a reproductive endocrine dysfunction (RED), e.g., pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism. The methods include measuring a baseline level of LH in the subject; administering a stimulating dose of kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog to the subject, e.g., a dose comprising to 0.08-15 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, administered via intravenous bolus (WB) or a dose comprising 0.8-500 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection; measuring at least one level of LH after administration of the stimulating dose, e.g., within about 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, or 60 minutes after administration of the stimulating dose; comparing the baseline level of LH in the subject to the level of LH after administration of the stimulating dose, and identifying a subject with delayed puberty who has a level of LH after administration of the stimulating dose that is similar to the baseline level of LH (e.g., less than 3.5, 3, 2.5, or 2 times the baseline level) as having a RED, e.g., pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism.
Alternatively, the methods can include administering a stimulating dose of kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog to the subject, e.g., a dose comprising to 0.08-15 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, administered via intravenous bolus (WB) or a dose comprising 0.8-500 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection; measuring at least one level of LH after administration of the stimulating dose, e.g., within about 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, or 60 minutes after administration of the stimulating dose; comparing the level of LH after administration of the stimulating dose to a reference level, and identifying a subject with delayed puberty who has a level of LH after administration of the stimulating dose that is below (or not significantly different from) the reference level of LH as having a RED, e.g., pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism.
In some embodiments, the methods include administering a treatment for the reproductive endocrine dysfunction, e.g., pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism, to the identified subject.
In some embodiments, the treatment includes administering a plurality of doses of kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog. In some embodiments, the plurality of doses are administered at 1-6 hour intervals, preferably at 2-3 hour intervals, over at least 2-3 days and preferably over at least 1-12 months. In some embodiments, each of the plurality of doses comprises a dose equivalent to 0.08-2.4 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, administered via intravenous bolus (IVB), subcutaneous injection (SC), or via a pump. In some embodiments, each of the plurality of doses comprises a dose equivalent to 0.2-0.3 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, preferably 0.24 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10. In some embodiments, the plurality of doses comprises at least one supraphysiologic dose equivalent to 2.4-24 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10. In some embodiments, the at least one supraphysiologic dose is administered as a first dose, or first two or more doses, optionally all, of the plurality of doses.
In some embodiments, the methods include administering a therapeutically effective amount of an opioid antagonist or mixed agonist-antagonist to the subject. In some embodiments, the opioid antagonist is naloxone or naltrexone, or the mixed agonist-antagonist is buprenorphine.
In some embodiments, the treatment further comprises administering gonadal steroid replacement therapy, e.g., testosterone in males and estrogen and/or progesterone/progestin in females.
In some embodiments, the methods further include administration of one or more gonadotropins (e.g., luteinizing hormone (LH) and/or follicle-stimulating hormone, (FSH)).
In some embodiments, the plurality of doses are administered at 1-6 hour intervals, preferably at 2 hour intervals, over at least 2-3 days and preferably over at least 1-12 months.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Methods and materials are described herein for use in the present invention; other, suitable methods and materials known in the art can also be used. The materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting. All publications, patent applications, patents, sequences, database entries, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description and figures, and from the claims.
Despite nearly 50 years since the discovery of GnRH (31), understanding the factors that drive the onset of sexual maturation and subsequently maintain reproductive function remains a challenge that complicates diagnosis and treatment. Patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) are a key population to uncover these signals, as they have abnormal GnRH secretion/action (32, 33). Most IHH patients present as teens with delayed pubertal development and suffer life-long sexual infantilism and infertility if left untreated (32, 33).
Described herein are methods of diagnosing and treating delayed puberty using kisspeptin.
For decades, clinicians and researchers have tried to develop tests to predict whether a child with pubertal delay will eventually progress through puberty (8). These tests include measurement of baseline (unstimulated) serum gonadotropins (luteinizing hormone, LH, and follicle-stimulating hormone, FSH), gonadotropins after stimulation with GnRH or GnRH analogs, and inhibin B at baseline. Unfortunately, all of these tests have significant deficits in sensitivity, specificity, or both (8). For example, studies have demonstrated significant overlap in serum inhibin B concentrations between boys with constitutional delay and those with IHH, with 10-29% of those with constitutional delay and 22-45% of those with IHH having an inhibin B that falls in the range of overlap (9-11). Despite an ever-growing understanding of the genetics of IHH and constitutional delay, genetic testing is currently inadequate for predicting pubertal outcomes. Currently, less than half of IHH patients have an identifiable mutation in an IHH gene (7). Furthermore, even if a mutation is found, the predictive power is limited by variable penetrance and expressivity; within the same family, some carriers of an IHH gene mutation may have IHH and others may have constitutional delay (24).
Children with delayed puberty who later progress through puberty are often indistinguishable at first presentation from those who have abiding hypogonadotropism, and years of waiting may be needed before a given child's outcome is known. As a result, patients, families, and providers can be faced with a conundrum when deciding between two common management approaches for delayed puberty: treatment with sex steroids or watchful waiting without intervention.
Kisspeptin is a neuropeptide secreted in the hypothalamus that potently stimulates GnRH secretion in all mammalian species studied to date, including humans (12). In studies by our group and others, reproductively intact adults responded to a single bolus of kisspeptin with a robust increase in LH, whereas adults with IHH largely did not (13-19). Thus, provocative testing using kisspeptin can be used to assess an individual's capacity for GnRH secretion.
Children with delayed or stalled puberty have a range of responses to kisspeptin, from no response to robust responses (20). Described herein are the results of a prospective study showing that a child's ability to respond to kisspeptin can predict whether that child will subsequently progress through puberty.
The kisspeptin-stimulation test described herein overcomes two fundamental challenges in predicting pubertal outcomes for children with delayed puberty. The first challenge is that there has not been a method to distinguish the physiologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism of a normal prepubertal child from the pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism of a child who has IHH. Being a provocative test, the kisspeptin-stimulation test provides the first method to measure a child's future potential for GnRH secretion. Indeed, we found that kisspeptin could elicit LH responses in children who eventually progressed through puberty at a time when they appeared prepubertal on physical examination and daytime laboratory evaluation.
The second challenge is distinguishing a child with a temporary pause in pubertal development from a child with IHH and partial pubertal development that has permanently stalled. We had previously shown that adults with IHH and partial reproductive endocrine activity fail to respond to kisspeptin (19). Similarly, in the current study, one participant who exhibited partial reproductive endocrine activity (Participants 8) had diminished responses to kisspeptin that correctly predicted his lack of pubertal development by 18 years, whereas inhibin B and GnRH-induced LH suggested that he would later progress through puberty.
As described in Example 1, in two participants (Participants B and 11) the lack of LH pulses on overnight measurements did not correctly anticipate the participants' eventual progress through puberty, whereas the kisspeptin-stimulation test accurately predicted the participants' outcomes. These participants had been receiving sex-steroid treatment at the time of their study visits, and this may have suppressed endogenous LH secretion. In contrast, their responses to kisspeptin were robust, and thus the kisspeptin-stimulation test reliably predicted their eventual pubertal progression even when performed in the context of exogenous sex-steroid treatment (e.g., testosterone in males and estrogen and/or progesterone/progestin in females).
Some patients with IHH may have intact responses to kisspeptin (e.g., those with mutations in TAC3 and TACR3, the genes for neurokinin B and its receptor, which appear to function upstream of kisspeptin, or in KISS1, which encodes kisspeptin itself) (25,26). However, this is likely to be only a small subset of DM patients, as mutations in TACR3 are present in only about 5% of patients with normosmic IHH, and mutations in TAC3 and KISS1 are rare causes of IHH (27-30).
Thus, the present methods can be used to diagnose pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism, e.g., IHH, in subjects, e.g., mammalian, e.g., human subjects. In some embodiments the subjects are at least 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or 15 years old, and/or are under the age of 18, 19, or 20 years, e.g., are 10-20 years old, 10-19, 10-18, 11-18, 11-19, 11-20, 12-18, 12-19, or 12-20 years old. The methods can also be used to detect dysfunction in reproductive endocrine function or partial or late-onset forms of pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, e.g., in subjects of any age. In some embodiments, the methods are used to diagnose congenital forms of pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, e.g., in children of any age, including neonates.
In some embodiments, although the current formal clinical definition of IHH requires a patient to be 18 years or older, in a subject who is less than 18 years old, the present methods determine that they have IHH, allowing this diagnosis to be made years earlier than the traditional age cutoff. In some embodiments, the present methods determine that they are at risk of developing IHH or have a high likelihood of developing IHH.
The methods rely on detection of levels of LH in response to administration of at least one stimulating dose of kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog, e.g., a dose equivalent to at least 0.08, 0.1, 0.12, 0.14, 0.16, 0.18, 0.20, 0.22, or 0.24 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, up to about 8, 10, 12, 14, or 15 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, e.g., 0.08-15 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, e.g., 0.1-12 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, e.g., 0.2-10.11 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, e.g., 0.2-0.5 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, e.g., 0.22-0.25 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, e.g., 0.24 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, preferably administered as an intravenous bolus (WB). The dose can also be administered, e.g., as a subcutaneous (SC) or intranasal bolus. When administered SC, the dose is higher than the IV dose range, e.g., 10, 20 or about 30-times higher than the dose ranges above, e.g., at least 0.8 nmol/kg up to about 500, 600, or 750 nmol/kg. Intranasal doses are typically ˜10× subcutaneous doses, so 24 to 5000, 6000, or 7500 nmol/kg.
The methods can include obtaining at least one, e.g., one or more, sample from a subject, and evaluating the level of LH in the sample, and comparing the level with one or more references, e.g., a control reference that represents a normal level of LH, e.g., a level in a subject who does not have pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism, and/or a disease reference that represents a level of LH in a subject having pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism. Suitable reference values can include those shown in the Examples below. In preferred embodiments, the methods include obtaining a plurality of samples from the subject, e.g., before, during, and after administration of the stimulating dose, and determining levels of LH in the samples, and comparing the levels of LH in the samples before administration of the stimulating dose (e.g., baseline levels) to levels after administration of the stimulating dose. Thus the methods can include comparing the absolute LH level after kisspeptin administration to a reference (e.g., a reference representing a cohort of subjects, or baseline level in the subject); and/or determining a change in LH level from baseline to after stimulation, either as a) the unit increase (difference), b) the relative change (ratio). In some embodiments, subjects with LH ratios of 3.5. 4, 4.5 or greater, e.g., 4.85 or greater, are identified as having constitutional delay, while those who had LH ratios below 3.5, e.g., below 3, e.g., 2.33 or less are identified as having pathologic HH.
As used herein the term “sample”, when referring to the material to be tested for the presence of LH using a method described herein includes inter alia whole blood, plasma, serum, or urine.
Various methods are well known within the art for the quantification of LH from a sample. The methods can include isolation and/or purification of LH from the sample before quantification. An “isolated” or “purified” biological marker is substantially free of cellular material or other contaminants from the cell or tissue source from which the biological marker is derived i.e. partially or completely altered or removed from the natural state through human intervention. For example, nucleic acids contained in the sample are first isolated according to standard methods, for example using lytic enzymes, chemical solutions, or isolated by nucleic acid-binding resins following the manufacturer's instructions.
The presence and/or level of LH can be evaluated using methods known in the art, e.g., using standard electrophoretic and quantitative immunoassay methods for proteins, including but not limited to, Western blot; enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); biotin/avidin type assays; protein array detection; radio-immunoassay; immunohistochemistry (IHC); immune-precipitation assay; FACS (fluorescent activated cell sorting); mass spectrometry (Kim (2010) Am J Clin Pathol 134:157-162; Yasun (2012) Anal Chem 84(14):6008-6015; Brody (2010) Expert Rev Mol Diagn 10(8):1013-1022; Philips (2014) PLOS One 9(3):e90226; Pfaffe (2011) Clin Chem 57(5): 675-687). The methods typically include revealing labels such as fluorescent, chemiluminescent, radioactive, and enzymatic or dye molecules that provide a signal either directly or indirectly. As used herein, the term “label” refers to the coupling (i.e. physically linkage) of a detectable substance, such as a radioactive agent or fluorophore (e.g. phycoerythrin (PE) or indocyanine (Cy5), to an antibody or probe, as well as indirect labeling of the probe or antibody (e.g. horseradish peroxidase, HRP) by reactivity with a detectable substance.
In some embodiments, an ELISA method may be used, wherein the wells of a mictrotiter plate are coated with an antibody against which the protein is to be tested. The sample containing or suspected of containing the biological marker is then applied to the wells. After a sufficient amount of time, during which antibody-antigen complexes would have formed, the plate is washed to remove any unbound moieties, and a detectably labelled molecule is added. Again, after a sufficient period of incubation, the plate is washed to remove any excess, unbound molecules, and the presence of the labeled molecule is determined using methods known in the art. Variations of the ELISA method, such as the competitive ELISA or competition assay, and sandwich ELISA, may also be used, as these are well-known to those skilled in the art. Immunometric assays can be used.
Mass spectrometry, and particularly matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) and surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (SELDI-MS), are useful for the detection of LH. (See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,118,937; 5,045,694; 5,719,060; 6,225,047).
Specific assays for LH are described in Wheeler, Methods Mol Biol. 2006; 324:109-24; Beastall et al., Ann Clin Biochem. 1987 May; 24 (Pt 3):246-62; Pappa et al., Theriogenology. 1999 Apr. 1; 51(5):911-26.
In some embodiments, the level of LH after kisspeptin stimulation is comparable to the presence and/or level of the protein(s) in the disease reference, and the subject has one or more symptoms associated with pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism, then the subject has pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism. In some embodiments, the subject has no overt signs or symptoms of pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism, but the presence and/or level of one or more of the proteins evaluated is comparable to the presence and/or level of the protein(s) in the disease reference, then the subject has an attenuated form of pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and/or an increased risk of developing pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism. In some embodiments, the subject has signs or symptoms of pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism, but has a normal LH response, then the subject is sent for additional testing. In some embodiments, once it has been determined that a person has pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism or has an increased risk of developing pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism, then a treatment, e.g., as known in the art or as described herein, can be administered.
Suitable reference values can be determined using methods known in the art, e.g., using standard clinical trial methodology and statistical analysis. The reference values can have any relevant form. In some cases, the reference comprises a predetermined value for a meaningful level of LH, e.g., a control reference level that represents a normal level of LH, e.g., a level in an unaffected subject or a subject who is not at risk of developing a disease described herein, and/or a disease reference that represents a level of LH associated with pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism, e.g., a level in a subject having DM or KS.
The predetermined level can be a single cut-off (threshold) value, such as a median or mean, or a level that defines the boundaries of an upper or lower quartile, tertile, or other segment of a clinical trial population that is determined to be statistically different from the other segments. It can be a range of cut-off (or threshold) values, such as a confidence interval. It can be established based upon comparative groups, such as where association with risk of developing disease or presence of disease in one defined group is a fold higher, or lower, (e.g., approximately 2-fold, 4-fold, 8-fold, 16-fold or more) than the risk or presence of disease in another defined group. It can be a range, for example, where a population of subjects (e.g., control subjects) is divided equally (or unequally) into groups, such as a low-risk group, a medium-risk group and a high-risk group, or into quartiles, the lowest quartile being subjects with the lowest risk and the highest quartile being subjects with the highest risk, or into n-quantiles (i.e., n regularly spaced intervals) the lowest of the n-quantiles being subjects with the lowest risk and the highest of the n-quantiles being subjects with the highest risk.
In some embodiments, the predetermined level is a level or occurrence in the same subject, e.g., at a different time point, e.g., an earlier time point (e.g., before stimulation with kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog). Thus in some embodiments the methods can include calculating a ratio of levels or difference in levels, and detecting the presence of a change in the level of LH after stimulation with kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog.
Subjects associated with predetermined values are typically referred to as reference subjects. For example, in some embodiments, a control reference subject does not have a disorder described herein (e.g. pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism). In some cases it may be desirable that the control subject is male and in other cases it may be desirable that a control subject is female, and a reference level established that is used for a subject of the same sex. In some cases it may be desirable that the control subject has pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism, and in other cases it may be desirable that a control subject does not have pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism (e.g., is a subject who has constitutional delayed puberty but will eventually undergo puberty on their own without intervention).
A disease reference subject is one who has pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism.
Thus, in some cases the level of LH in a subject being less than or equal to a reference level of LH (or change in LH after stimulation) is indicative of a clinical status (e.g., indicative of pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism). In other cases the level of LH in a subject being greater than or equal to the reference level of LH is indicative of the absence of disease or normal risk of the disease. In some embodiments, the amount by which the level in the subject is the less than the reference level is sufficient to distinguish a subject from a control subject, and optionally is statistically significantly less than the level in a control subject. In cases where the level of LH in a subject being equal to the reference level of LH, the “being equal” refers to being approximately equal (e.g., not statistically different).
In a prepubertal child with gonadal insufficiency (as opposed to insufficiency at the level of the brain or pituitary gland, i.e., hypogonadotropic hypogonadism), the response to kisspeptin may be larger than in general population. They would still have “normal risk” of pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.
The predetermined value can depend upon the particular population of subjects (e.g., human subjects) selected. For example, an apparently healthy population will have a different ‘normal’ range of levels of LH than will a population of subjects which have, are likely to have, or are at greater risk to have, pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism. Accordingly, the predetermined values selected may take into account the category (e.g., sex, age, presence of other diseases) in which a subject (e.g., human subject) falls. Appropriate ranges and categories can be selected with no more than routine experimentation by those of ordinary skill in the art.
In characterizing likelihood, or risk, numerous predetermined values can be established.
The present methods can include treatments for pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism. In some embodiments, the treatment is administered to a subject who is identified by a method described herein.
The methods described herein include methods for the treatment of disorders associated with pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism. In some embodiments, the disorder is DM or KS (e.g., if the subject has anosmia). Generally, the methods include administering a therapeutically effective amount of kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog as described herein, to a subject who is in need of, or who has been determined to be in need of, such treatment. The methods can also be used to treat subjects who have hypothalamic amenorrhea, e.g., due to states of negative energy balance (e.g., undernourished, anorexic, or athletes), hyperprolactinemia, adult-onset hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, medication effects (e.g., from glucocorticoids, opioids) or attenuated forms of pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and/or those at risk for developing pathologic HH, e.g., subjects with idiopathic infertility, irregular menstrual cycles, or abnormal semen analysis.
As used in this context, to “treat” means to ameliorate at least one symptom of the disorder associated with pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism. Often, pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism results in absence of puberty, e.g., by 18 years of age; poorly developed or undeveloped secondary sexual characteristics, or infertility; thus, a treatment can result in onset of puberty, development of secondary sexual characteristics and/or a return of fertility. Administration of a therapeutically effective amount of a compound described herein for the treatment of pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism will result in one or more of increased levels of LH, increased levels of sex steroids (e.g., testosterone in males and estrogen and/or progesterone/progestin in females), and gametogenesis, e.g., in some cases increased levels of LH in response to administration of a stimulating dose of kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog.
Thus, in some embodiments provided herein are methods for treatment of pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism, e.g., DM or KS. The methods can comprise administration of one or more doses, e.g., supraphysiologic and/or physiologic or near-phsyiologic doses, of kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog. In some embodiments, the doses can be administered, e.g., periodically, e.g., every 1-6, 1-4, 2-6 or 2-4 hours over a period of days, weeks, months, or years, e.g., for 2-4 days, e.g., for 48 hours, optionally repeated once a month, once every other month, once every three months, once every four months, once every 6 months, once every 8 months, once every 10 months, or once a year, optionally administered chronically, e.g., every day for a period of days, weeks, months, or years. The treatment can be continued until, and optionally stopped or reduced when, a desired outcome, e.g., fertility, or development of secondary sexual characteristics, has been achieved. In some embodiments, at least some of the doses are at physiological or near-physiological levels, e.g., 0.08-2.4, e.g., 0.1-5, 0.2-0.4, e.g., 0.24 nmol/kg IVB. In some embodiments, the methods include administering at least one dose that is supraphysiological, e.g., equivalent to 2-25, e.g., 2.4-24 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, e.g., at least 2, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10, up to 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, or 25 nmol/kg kisspeptin-10. In some embodiments, the doses are administered SC, with physiologic doses of 0.8 to 60 nmol/kg, and supraphysiologic doses of 60 to 1200 nmol/kg.
In some embodiments, the administration is, e.g., intravenous, subcutaneous, or nasal. In some embodiments, the methods include using a pump to administer the dose. Thus administration can take place by means of an infusion pump, e.g., in the form of a device or system borne by a subject or patient and comprising a reservoir containing a liquid composition comprising an active agent and an infusion pump for delivery/administration of the composition to the subject or patient, or in the form of a corresponding miniaturized device suitable for implantation within the body of the subject or patient, e.g., a device similar to an insulin pump, that can deliver periodic boluses of the active agents.
In some embodiments, the methods include repeating a kisspeptin-stimulation test as described above, e.g., after 2-3 days. In some embodiments, the treatment continues for months and years until all desired effects. For example, for ovulation induction in women, a course could be anywhere from 1 month to 6 months. For spermatogenesis induction in men, a course could be anywhere from 3 to 24 months. For pubertal induction and/or maintenance of reproductive endocrine function, treatment could be for years.
The methods can also or alternatively include administration of an opioid antagonist, and/or a conventional treatment for pathologic hypogonadotropic hypogonadotropism.
Kisspeptin resistance can occur in normosmic and anosmic forms of hypogonadotropism, as
Kisspeptin and Kisspeptin Analogs
As used herein, Kisspeptin refers to a family of neuropeptides that result from the cleavage of a 145-amino-acid precursor peptide that is encoded by the KISS1 gene (Lee et al. 1996, Ohtaki et al. 2001). In humans, the active form of kisspeptin is thought to be a 54-amino-acid peptide (Ohtaki et al. 2001, Terao et al. 2004). The present methods can include administration of the full-length kisspeptin (NP_002247.3), the 54-amino-acid peptide (kisspeptin-54 (KP54)), or kisspeptin-10, a 10-amino-acid peptide comprising the sequence YNWNSFGLRF (SEQ ID NO:1). Analogs of Kiss-10 are known in the art and include those described in Curtis et al., Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010 February; 298(2): E296-E303; Gutiérrez-Pascual et al., Mol Pharmacol. 2009 July; 76(1):58-67; Niida et al., Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006 Jan. 1; 16(1):134-7; Orsini et al., J Med Chem. 2007 Feb. 8; 50(3):462-71; Roseweir et al., J Neurosci. 2009 Mar. 25; 29(12):3920-9. In some embodiments, the analog is [dY]1KP-10. Analogs can include those in which conservative substitutions are made to sequence disclosed herein, e.g., one, two or three amino acid substitutions, wherein the analog retains agonistic activities to KISS1R. In some embodiments, the analog is a peptide compound in which, inter alia, a peptide bond between a glycine residue and the adjacent residue, located in a region near the C-terminus of the compound, is replaced by a disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole ring, e.g., as described in WO2014118318A1; a peptide compound as described in US20200172575; Compound 1, described in US 20200046797 U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,960,348 and 8,404,643; C6, described in Parker et al., Theriogenology. 2019 May; 130:111-119; KISS1-305; TAK-448 (Ac-D-Tyr-D-Trp-Asn-Thr-Phe-azaGly-Leu-Arg(Me)-Trp-NH2 (SEQ ID NO:2); see Decourt et al., Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 26908; MacLean et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 August; 99(8):E1445-53; Skorupskaite et al., Hum Reprod Update. 2014 July; 20(4): 485-500) (e.g., TAK-448 acetate); or TAK-683 (N-Acetyl-YWNTFGL{Met-R}W-NH2 (SEQ ID NO:3); see Kanai et al., J Reprod Dev. 2017 June; 63(3): 305-310); and compounds described in US 20160074320; WO200285399; WO2004060264; WO2004101747; WO2004063221; EP1604682; WO2005117939; and EP1464652. See also Matsui and Asami, Neuroendocrinology 2014; 99:49-60. Pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, pharmaceutical compositions containing kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog, can be used in the methods herein.
In some embodiments, where a peptide agonist is used, the peptide is modified.
Peptide analogs including reversed sequences can also be used, e.g., FRLGFSNWNY (SEQ ID NO:4).
Peptide analogs disclosed herein can include those modified according to methods known in the art for producing peptidomimetics. See, e.g., Qvit et al., Drug Discov Today. 2017 February; 22(2): 454-462; Farhadi and Hashemian, Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018; 12: 1239-1254; Avan et al., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 3575-3594; Pathak, et al., Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2015. 8; Kazmierski, W. M., ed., Peptidomimetics Protocols, Human Press (Totowa N.J. 1998); Goodman et al., eds., Houben-Weyl Methods of Organic Chemistry: Synthesis of Peptides and Peptidomimetics, Thiele Verlag (New York 2003); and Mayo et al., J. Biol. Chem., 278:45746 (2003). In some cases, these modified peptidomimetic versions of the peptides and fragments disclosed herein exhibit enhanced stability in vivo, relative to the non-peptidomimetic peptides.
Methods for creating a peptidomimetic include substituting one or more, e.g., all, of the amino acids in a peptide sequence with D-amino acid enantiomers. Such sequences are referred to herein as “retro” sequences. In another method, the N-terminal to C-terminal order of the amino acid residues is reversed, such that the order of amino acid residues from the N terminus to the C terminus of the original peptide becomes the order of amino acid residues from the C-terminus to the N-terminus in the modified peptidomimetic. Such sequences can be referred to as “inverso” sequences.
Peptidomimetics can be both the retro and inverso versions, i.e., the “retro-inverso” version of a peptide disclosed herein. The new peptidomimetics can be composed of D-amino acids arranged so that the order of amino acid residues from the N-terminus to the C-terminus in the peptidomimetic corresponds to the order of amino acid residues from the C-terminus to the N-terminus in the original peptide.
Other methods for making a peptidomimetic include replacing one or more amino acid residues in a peptide with a chemically distinct but recognized functional analog of the amino acid, i.e., an artificial amino acid analog. Artificial amino acid analogs include β-amino acids, β-substituted β-amino acids (“β3-amino acids”), phosphorous analogs of amino acids, such as ∀-amino phosphonic acids and ∀-amino phosphinic acids, and amino acids having non-peptide linkages. Artificial amino acids can be used to create peptidomimetics, such as peptoid oligomers (e.g., peptoid amide or ester analogues), β-peptides, cyclic peptides, oligourea or oligocarbamate peptides; or heterocyclic ring molecules. Exemplary retro-inverso peptidomimetics include FRLGFSNWNY, wherein the sequences include all D-amino acids.
The sequences can also be modified, e.g., by biotinylation or pegylation of the amino terminus and/or amidation of the carboxy terminus.
Opioid Antagonists
In some embodiments, the methods described herein include administration of an effective amount of an opioid antagonist, e.g., naloxone or naltrexone, or mixed agonists-antagonists, e.g., buprenorphine. Others can also be used, e.g., nalmefene. The opioid antagonist can be administered as an alternative to, or before, after, or concurrently with kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog or other treatment as described herein. Thus provided herein are compositions comprising (i) kisspeptin or a kisspeptin analog and (ii) an opioid antagonist, e.g., naloxone or naltrexone, or a mixed agonist-antagonist, e.g., buprenorphine.
Conventional Treatments for Pathologic Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadotropism
In some embodiments, the methods include administration of gonadal steroid replacement therapy, including testosterone in males (e.g., testosterone esters (eg, enanthate, cypionate, undecanoate) and estrogen and/or progestin in females (e.g., conjugated estrogens (Premarin), ethinyl estradiol, or estradiol; and/or medroxyprogesterone, micronized progesterone); and/or hormonal contraceptives (e.g., ethinyl-estradiol/norethindrone). The methods can also include administration of gonadotropins, e.g., follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Optionally clomiphene and/or letrozole can be used to stimulate ovulation in a subset of patients.
The invention is further described in the following examples, which do not limit the scope of the invention described in the claims.
Materials and Methods
The following materials and methods were used in this Example.
Study Approval
The physiologic study on the kisspeptin-stimulation test was approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)/Partners IRB and is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01438034). Kisspeptin was used under IND 113,591, and GnRH was used under IND 93,353. Studies on the genetics of delayed puberty and IHH were approved by Boston Children's Hospital and MGH, respectively. All participants gave written informed assent, and at least one parent gave written informed consent. For the two participants who underwent retesting, the repeat testing was approved by the Partners IRB, and participants and their parents gave written informed assent and consent for the retesting.
Study Protocol
Details of the study protocol have been described previously (20). Briefly, inclusion criteria were age 12 years or older for girls and 13.5 years or older for boys, with delayed or stalled puberty defined based on breast development for girls and testicular volume for boys. Children with an identifiable cause of delayed puberty were excluded. Participants had two admissions to the MGH Translational and Clinical Research Center (TCRC) for blood sampling every 10 minutes to measure baseline LH secretion overnight, LH secretion in response to kisspeptin-10 0.313 mcg/kg (ΔLHkisspeptin), and LH secretion in response to GnRH 75 ng/kg (ΔLHGnRH). ΔLHkisspeptin and ΔLHGnRH were assessed both before and after pituitary “priming” with pulsatile subcutaneous GnRH 75 ng/kg every 2 hours for 6 days to ensure robust pituitary responsiveness to GnRH (8).
Participants subsequently returned every 6 months for follow-up visits to undergo physical examinations and measurement of FSH, LH, and either estradiol or testosterone to assess reproductive endocrine activity. Upon reaching the age of 18 years, participants underwent a final evaluation for physical and laboratory signs of reproductive endocrine activity. For participants receiving sex-steroid treatment, treatment was held prior to laboratory studies to ensure that sex-steroid measurements reflected endogenous production rather than exogenous administration (for 4 weeks for estradiol, for 6 weeks for injected testosterone, and for 2 weeks for transdermal testosterone).
Laboratory Assays
For the TCRC visits, LH, FSH, testosterone (T), and estradiol were measured by the MGH Clinical Laboratory Research Core, the Brigham and Women's Hospital Research Assay & Analysis Core, and Labcorp as previously described (20), e.g., using microparticle enzyme immunoassay using the automated Abbott AxSYM system (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Ill.) for serum LH and FSH, the DPC Coat-A-Count RIA kit (Diagnostics Products Corporation, Los Angeles, Calif.) for serum T concentrations (60). Precision of the LH assay was 4.3-6.4%. Inhibin B was measured in a single batch by immunoassay by the University of Virginia Ligand Assay Core, with an intraassay coefficient of variation of 2.5%. For follow-up visits, laboratory studies were performed by Labcorp and Quest Diagnostics. For participants outside the Boston area, follow-up data was obtained through their routine clinical care from their local endocrinologists and clinical laboratories.
Genetic Testing
Whole-exome sequencing was performed at the Broad Institute (Cambridge, Mass.). Exome-sequencing data was screened for variants in 30 genes associated with IHH/KS, delayed puberty, or both (listed in Table 1 (21)). Variants were classified according to criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (22).
Statistics
Fisher's exact test was used to assess the association between results of the kisspeptin-stimulation test and pubertal outcomes. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. The Jeffreys interval was used to calculate confidence intervals for sensitivity and specificity.
6/6†
4/4†
8/8†
Responses to Kisspeptin
Seventeen participants with delayed or stalled puberty participated in this study (4 girls and 13 boys,
Long-Term Follow-Up
After this initial neuroendocrine characterization, participants returned for follow-up visits every 6 months. Eight participants (2 girls and 6 boys) progressed through puberty during the follow-up period (Table 4, Table 3 (21)). The boys demonstrated progressive increases in testicular volume, and the girls exhibited progressive breast development in the absence of exogenous treatment. All of these participants were “kisspeptin responders” who had responded to exogenous kisspeptin with a rise in LH of 0.8 mIU/mL or greater (
In contrast, 8 participants (1 girl and 7 boys) failed to enter puberty by age 18 years (Table 4, Table 3 (21)). These participants exhibited persistent sexual immaturity on physical examination; boys had testicular volumes <4 mL, and the girl did not have breast development until she started treatment with exogenous estradiol. On assessment of endogenous reproductive endocrine activity after discontinuation of sex-steroid treatment, all of these participants had serum concentrations of sex steroids (estradiol for girls, testosterone for boys) that were below the adult reference range and serum gonadotropin concentrations that were either low or inappropriately normal in the context of low sex steroids. These individuals who failed to enter puberty were “kisspeptin nonresponders” (1 girl and 6 boys) who had shown little to no response to kisspeptin (an eighth “nonresponder” was lost to follow-up) and 1 male “intermediate responder” who had shown an LH response to kisspeptin of 0.4 mIU/mL (
Thus, the participants' responses to kisspeptin cleanly distinguished those who later progressed through puberty from those who did not (p=0.0002). Sensitivity and specificity for the kisspeptin-stimulation test were both 100% (95% CI 74-100%).
LH Measurements Under Three Conditions: Daytime, Overnight, and after GnRH Stimulation
Unstimulated LH concentrations (measured during the day or overnight) and LH measured after stimulation by exogenous GnRH have been studied as methods to predict whether a child will eventually enter puberty (8). In this study, 2 boys had unstimulated serum LH concentrations in the pubertal range at the time of enrollment, and 1 was later found to progress through puberty. Of the remaining 14 participants with LH in the prepubertal range at enrollment, 7 later progressed through puberty and 7 did not (
In early puberty, daytime gonadotropin measurements may not accurately reflect activity of the reproductive endocrine axis because pulses of GnRH and LH secretion occur only at night during the deep stages of sleep (23). We had therefore conducted overnight blood sampling to detect sleep-associated LH secretion. All 6 children who had at least one pulse of LH secretion overnight were later found to progress through puberty (Table 4). In contrast, variable outcomes were observed for the 10 children who had no LH pulses overnight. While 8 failed to progress through puberty, 2 exhibited pubertal progression: one girl and one boy (Participants B and 11) who at the time of neuroendocrine evaluation were being treated with exogenous sex steroids that may have suppressed endogenous LH secretion.
GnRH-stimulated LH secretion has also been studied as a test to predict pubertal outcomes (8). In our cohort, LH responses to GnRH were overlapping, ranging from 1.2 to 15.4 mIU/mL in those who later progressed through puberty and from 0.2 to 7.5 mIU/mL in those who did not (
Thus, none of these tests—unstimulated LH, whether measured during the day or at night, or GnRH-stimulated LH—was as accurate as the kisspeptin-stimulation test for predicting pubertal outcomes in this study cohort.
Inhibin B
Measurement of serum inhibin B has been proposed as a method to predict pubertal outcomes for children with delayed puberty (8-11). Serum inhibin B ranged from 39 to 209 pg/mL in boys who later progressed through puberty and from <17 pg/mL to 48 pg/mL in boys who did not (
Genetic Testing
A subset of participants consented to exome sequencing. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in 30 DM genes (Table 1; (21)) were identified in 2 of 5 participants who later progressed through puberty and 2 of 6 participants who did not enter puberty (Table 5). No pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in IGSF10, a gene potentially associated with constitutional delay. Thus, genetic testing could not predict pubertal outcomes for children with pubertal delay.
One subject with pubertal delay in the study described in Example 1 received kisspeptin-10 0.313 μg/kg WB (physiologic dose) at age 15.3 y and failed to mount a LH response. During a separate admission shortly thereafter, he received a supraphysiologic dose of kisspeptin (18 μg/kg), and surprisingly, did respond. The subject's final diagnosis was IHH as evidenced by failure to show physical signs of puberty by 18 y. This demonstrates that 1) GnRH deficiency can be attributed to kisspeptin resistance and 2) this resistance can be overcome with high-dose kisspeptin.
Based on this observation, it was hypothesized that high-dose and/or repetitive administration of kisspeptin could stimulate GnRH-induced LH secretion in patients with IHH/KS. To address this hypothesis, the following protocol was initiated: 1) q10 min blood sampling×6 h, 2) kisspeptin administration q2 h×40 h (5 sets of 4 doses each: 0.313, 0.939, 3.13, and 13.19 μg/kg). For comparison,
Identification of the afferent pathways through which endogenous factors (e.g. gonadal steroids, stress hormones, and nutrient signals) and external cues (e.g. social cues and day length) regulate GnRH release have recently focused on the kisspeptin/neurokinin B/dynorphin system (34). Inactivating mutations in kisspeptin, neurokinin B (NKB), and their respective receptors cause DM in humans and mice, implicating these neuropeptides in the generation of GnRH pulses (35-42). Dynorphin is thought to oppose this stimulatory activity by providing critical slowing of GnRH pulse generator activity in response to progesterone during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (43-45). These three neuropeptides coalesce in a population of neurons in the arcuate nucleus, KNDy (Kisspeptin-Neurokinin B-Dynorphin) neurons, and are postulated to work in a coordinated fashion to synchronize the secretory activity of GnRH neurons to generate the pulses of GnRH secretion that are necessary to drive reproductive endocrine function (46-48).
Because biallelic loss-of-function mutations disrupt both copies of a gene, patients carrying such mutations (i.e. “human knockouts”) provide novel insights into the phenotypic consequences of gene disruption or loss. In this study, four sisters carrying biallelic, complete loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding NKB (one of the key neuropeptides in KNDy neurons) underwent genotype-driven phenotyping. Despite an initial diagnosis of IHH, several sisters spontaneously recovered reproductive endocrine function in adult life. Studies were performed in both normal and neurokinin B-deficient family members as well as normal and neurokinin B-deficient mice to investigate the role of NKB in GnRH pulse generation and to dissect the interactions between NKB, kisspeptin, and dynorphin. Use of a combination of specific neuroendocrine probes revealed that the hypothalamus is capable of generating GnRH-induced LH pulses despite genetic and pharmacologic antagonism of two of the three KNDy constituents, NKB and dynorphin.
The results shows an increase in LH levels during the NLX infusion in subjects with IHH. To date, the ability to stimulate endogenous GnRH-induced LH pulsations that mimic normal physiology in patients with IHH has been non-existent.
Considerations regarding LH pulses include the observation that Subject 4 appeared to have a more pronounced response to NLX than Subject 5. Subject 4 underwent pituitary priming with exogenous GnRH and Subject 5 did not, which may have amplified any effect of NLX on the LH response in Subject 4. Subject 4 had also been receiving intermittent hormone replacement therapy which may have enhanced endogenous kisspeptin action on GnRH release.
In prior studies, the inability of the same dose of kp-10, which effects a robust GnRH-induced LH response in healthy men and luteal-phase women, to bring about any effect in IHH patients across a range of genotypes suggested that the functional capacity of the GnRH neuronal network is fundamentally impaired in patients with IHH (58). In contrast to these previous observations in IHH patients with genotypes other than TAC3 or TACR3, Subjects 3, 4, and 5 responded to kp-10 IVB (58). Here, the low frequency pulses and the ability to respond to exogenous kp-10 administration suggest that the GnRH neuronal circuitry necessary for pulse generation remains intact in patients lacking NKB. However, the ability to respond to kp-10 with LH pulses was observed only in the setting of IVB administration, and not a continuous infusion, as has been reported by others (59). Differing doses of kp-10, LH assays and LH pulse algorithms may account for this discordance.
Methods
The following Materials and Methods were used in Example 3.
Subjects and Eligibility Criteria
Five women from a single consanguineous family were recruited on the basis of their genotype (Table 6). Subjects were either reproductively normal (Subject 1; genotype TAC3 c.61_61delG p.A21LfsX44 heterozygote) or carried a diagnosis of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (Subjects 2-5; genotype TAC3 c.61_61delG p.A21LfsX44 homozygote). The brothers and parents were not available for study participation. IHH was defined as hypogonadal sex steroid levels (estradiol <20 pg/mL in women) in the setting of low or normal gonadotropin levels at age ≥18 years and the absence of any identifiable medical condition that could cause hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. As in our previous report (19), reversal of IHH in women was defined as: 1) fertility without use of exogenous GnRH or gonadotropin therapy; 2) spontaneous menstrual cycling for at least 3 months in the absence of treatment; and/or 3) LH pulse frequency and amplitude within the normal range for women. Relapse after reversal was defined as again having hypogonadal sex-steroid levels (serum estradiol <20 pg/mL in women) and/or amenorrhea.
Subjects also participated in a genetics study. Patient DNA was screened for rare sequence variants (RSVs), defined as having a minor allele frequency of less than 1% in The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), in genes known to cause IHH, as described previously (20, 21). Genes screened were CHD7 (MIM 608892), FGF8 (MIM 600483), FGFR1 (MIM 136350), GNRH1 (MIM 152760), GNRHR (MIM 138850), HS6ST1 (MIM 604846), ANOS1 (previously called KAL1, MIM 300836), KISS1 (MIM 603286), KISS1R (MIM 604161), NSMF (previously called NELF, MIM 60813), PROK2 (MIM 607002), PROKR2 (MIM 607123), TAC3 (MIM 162330), and TACR3 (MIM 162332) by PCR amplification of exons followed by Sanger sequencing. RSVs were reported if they were predicted to be damaging by at least 2 out of 4 in silico prediction programs: PolyPhen-2 (22), SIFT (23), Mutation Taster (24), or Panther (25). The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) scores, from a 12-item smell test, were used to classify olfactory capabilities (26, 27).
Study Design
In 2010, the subjects with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (Subjects 2, 3, 4, 5) underwent detailed neuroendocrine phenotyping in which blood sampling was performed every 10 minutes (q10 min) for 6-8 hours to map endogenous LH pulsations at the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Cambridge, UK under the direction of Professor I. Sadaf Farooqi (
In 2016, Subjects 1, 3, 4, and 5 were invited to participate in a second series of daytime studies at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Clinical Research Center (CRC) to determine whether their endogenous LH pulse patterns could be modified by administration of GnRH, kisspeptin 112-121 (kp-10) and the non-specific opioid antagonist which blocks dynorphin, naloxone (NLX) (
Baseline studies: All subjects underwent q10 min blood sampling for at least 6 hours to evaluate endogenous GnRH-induced LH secretion during one of their visit days to the MGH CRC (
Kisspeptin boluses: After assessment of endogenous GnRH-induced LH secretion, subjects 3, 4, and 5, received the administration of kp-10 0.24 nmol/kg intravenous bolus (IVB) as prior work by our group demonstrated that this dose consistently elicits GnRH-induced LH pulses of physiologic amplitude in healthy men and healthy luteal-phase women (29, 30) (
Kisspeptin Infusion: In contrast to the WB studies, Subject 3 returned to the CRC to participate in a second admission in which kp-10 was administered as a continuous infusion (9.5 nmol/kg/hr) for 12 hours to determine its effect on endogenous GnRH-induced LH pulsations. Similar to the WB studies, blood samples were drawn q10 min and GnRH 75 ng/kg IVB was administered at study conclusion (
Naloxone Infusion, Blocking Dynorphin: Subjects 4 and 5 returned to the CRC and received an NLX infusion (NLX 10 mg WB, followed by infusion at 0.8 mg/hr) for 13 hours to determine the effect of blocking dynorphin signaling with opioid antagonism on endogenous LH pulses in the absence of NKB signaling. Midway through the infusion, kp-10 and GnRH boluses (kp-10 dose range: 0.24 to 2.4 nmol/kg, GnRH: 75 ng/kg) were administered to determine whether NLX administration might enhance the response to these peptides (
Source of Peptides
Kisspeptin 112-121, the 10-amino-acid isoform of kisspeptin (corresponding to amino acids 112-121 of the pre-prohormone), and GnRH were synthesized using good manufacturing practices by NeoMPS (PolyPeptide Laboratories, San Diego, Calif.). NeoMPS provided kisspeptin 112-121 under contract to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Naloxone was ordered from Hospira (Lake Forest, Ill.).
Human Laboratory Assays
LH for each sample and estradiol on 2-hour pools were measured by direct immunoassay using the automated Abbott ARCHITECT system (Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Park, Ill.) as previously described (28). Estradiol was measured by a 2nd generation immunoassay traceable to mass spectrometry-based assays for the 2010-2011 studies and by Elecsys (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind.) for 2016 studies (32, 33).
Assessment of Pulsatile LH Release in Peripubertal and Adult Tac2 Knockout Mice
Tac2+/− breeding pairs were generated by the Texas A&M Institute for Genomic Medicine (College Station, Tex.) and genotyped (34). All mice were generated and maintained on a Sv129/C57BL/6 hybrid background and group housed (three to five per cage) at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in a temperature- and light-controlled environment with lights on from 0600-1800 h and food and water provided ad libitum. Mice were handled daily for two to six weeks prior to the experiment to allow acclimation to sampling conditions.
Changes in LH secretion was assessed in sexually maturing (6-week-old) and adult (16-week-old) intact and ovariectomized (OVX) Tac2 knockout (KO) female mice and control (wild-type; WT) littermates (n=4-5 per group). Since Tac2 in mice encodes for NKB in humans, these mice are lacking NKB. Pulsatile measurements of LH secretion were assessed by repeated blood collection through a single incision at the tip of the tail. The tail was cleaned with saline then four ul blood was taken at each time point from the cut tail with a pipette. Whole blood was immediately diluted in 116 ul of 0.05% PBST, vortexed, and frozen on dry ice. Samples were stored at −80° C. for a subsequent LH ELISA. For kp-10 administration studies, thirty-six sequential blood samples were collected over a 6-hour sampling period. At 170 min of sampling (or 180 min of sampling for peripubertal Tac2 knockout mice), mice were injected with mouse kp-10 intraperitoneally (7.5 nmol/100 ul saline; Phoenix Pharmaceuticals). For NLX administration studies, thirty sequential blood samples were collected over a 5-hour sampling period from WT and Tac2 KO mice. WT and Tac2 KO mice were OVX'd to increase the frequency and amplitude of LH pulses to better determine the action of dynorphin removal in the generation of LH pulses. At 120 min of sampling, mice were injected with NLX intraperitoneally (5 mg/kg/100 ul saline; Sigma Aldrich).
Data Analysis
Human Pulse Analysis: LH pulses were identified using a validated modification of the Santen and Bardin method (35, 36) augmented by a deconvolution algorithm (29). Pulse amplitude of kp-10-induced or GnRH-induced LH pulses was calculated as the difference between time 0 of kp-10 or GnRH administration and the peak of the pulse.
Mouse Pulse Analysis: LH pulses were identified using a custom-made MATLAB code that reads the LH pulse data gathered by LH sandwich ELISA. The code includes a loop that determines a pulse based on if: a) the height of an LH value is 20% greater than the heights of either of the 2 previous values as well as 10% greater than the height of the following value; b) the peak at the second-time interval (i=2) is >20% greater than the single value that comes before it to be considered a pulse.
Statistics: Paired two-way t-tests were used to assess changes in mean LH, LH amplitude (nadir to peak of an LH pulse) and FSH at baseline, as defined in methods above, as compared to responses to neuropeptide interventions. All values are reports as mean±standard deviation, unless otherwise noted.
Study Approval
All human studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of MGH/Partners Healthcare, or by the Local Regional Ethics Committee of Cambridge, United Kingdom. All subjects gave written informed consent prior to inclusion in the studies. For the mouse studies, the Brigham and Women's Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all procedures.
Results
Study Subjects Initial Clinical Presentation and Subsequent Course
Subject 1 had a normal timing of menarche, normal menstrual cycles, and spontaneous pregnancy (Table 6). Her sisters, Subjects 2, 3, 4, and 5, presented at 13-15 y with primary amenorrhea and received estrogen therapy to induce secondary sexual characteristics. Because of the lack of spontaneous sexual maturation by age 18, normal MRI, and low gonadotropins, Subjects 2, 3, 4, and 5 all received a diagnosis of IHH (Table 6). None of the sisters are anosmic. Three of the four IHH sisters demonstrated reversal of their hypogonadotropism between 22-28 y as evidenced by pregnancy without fertility medications (Subjects 3 and 4) and regular spontaneous menstrual cycles (Subject 5). However, reversal was not permanent and at the time of the physiologic studies, subjects 3, 4, and 5 had reverted to a state of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (Table 6).
Genetics
Sequencing of candidate genes revealed that Subject 1 (normal timing of puberty and normal menstrual cycles) is heterozygous for a deletion of a single nucleotide in the gene encoding NKB (TAC3) (c.61_61delG p.A21LfsX44). This base pair deletion leads to a frameshift mutation and a premature stop codon in the pre-prohormone prior to the NKB sequence that would be predicted to result in nonsense-mediated decay. Even if the transcript were to escape nonsense-mediated decay, the frameshift mutation would disrupt the portion of the pre-prohormone that is processed to produce the decapeptide known as NKB. Subjects 2, 3, 4, and 5, all with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, are homozygous for this frameshift mutation. This mutation is novel and not found in gnomAD, a normative database containing 123,136 exomes and 15,496 genomes (21). Notably, there are no individuals homozygous for any protein-truncating mutations in TAC3 in gnomAD. This family harbors no other mutations in genes known to cause IHH.
Baseline Studies: Slow LH Pulse Frequency Characterizes IHH Individuals without Neurokinin B
At the time of these baseline studies, the IHH sisters (Subjects 2, 3, 4 and 5) were amenorrheic with low but detectable serum estradiol levels and low progesterone levels off hormonal medications (Table 6,
In contrast, Subject 1, the healthy sister with a heterozygous protein truncating variant in TAC3, underwent blood sampling on Day 4 of the menstrual cycle (early follicular phase; EFP). She exhibited 11 LH pulses in 12 hours with a mean LH pulse amplitude of 0.46±0.25 mIU/mL (
Kisspeptin Boluses: IHH Individuals without NKB Respond to Kisspeptin
All subjects responded to kisspeptin with an LH pulse (
Kisspeptin Infusion: No Pulsatile LH Secretion
Subject 3 received a kp-10 infusion (9.5 nmol/kg/hr) for 12 hours and no LH pulses were detected. There was a modest increase in mean LH during the infusion (baseline: 0.46±0.24 mIU/mL; kp-10 infusion: 0.63±0.08 mIU/mL; p<0.0001) (
Naloxone Infusion: Blocking Dynorphin with Naloxone Increases LH & FSH Secretion and LH Pulse Frequency, but does not Amplify Kisspeptin-Induced LH Pulses
Subjects 4 and 5 received the non-selective opioid antagonist, NLX, as well as escalating boluses of kisspeptin (0.24, 0.72, 2.4 nmol/kg) to determine the effect of blocking dynorphin signaling on endogenous and kisspeptin-stimulated LH secretory patterns. Both studies demonstrated increased mean LH levels during NLX infusion as compared to baseline (Subject 4—baseline: 1.44±0.76 mIU/mL, NLX: 2.82±0.54 mIU/mL, p<0.00001; Subject 5—baseline: 0.6±0.25 mIU/mL, NLX: 1.1±0.37 mIU/mL, p<0.00001, across matched time points) (
Subjects 4 and 5 also received escalating boluses of kp-10 (0.24, 0.72, 2.4 nmol/kg) which were followed by an LH pulse, recapitulating results seen off NLX (
Kisspeptin Boluses Stimulate LH Release in Peripubertal and Adult WT and NKB-Deficient (Tac2 KO) Mice
To corroborate the findings in IHH patients, we conducted experiments in Tac2 KO and WT control female mice. Peripheral administration of kp-10 elicited a robust increase in LH in all animal groups regardless of age and genotype. Interestingly, peripubertal Tac2 KO female mice, lacking NKB, displayed a higher magnitude of LH release (5.29±0.43 ng/ml, n=5) than control females (2.67±0.48 ng/ml, n=5; p<0.01) (
Naloxone Increases Pulsatile LH Release in Adult OVX WT and Tac2 KO Mice
To determine the role of the opiatergic (dynorphin) influence on kisspeptin signaling in the absence of NKB, we examined the effects of NLX, which blocks dynorphin, on LH secretion. Peripheral administration of NLX 5 mg/kg induced an increase in LH in both WT (
After NLX administration, WT mice responded with an increase in the duration of the following LH pulse post-NLX administration (pre-NLX: WT 25±2.67 min, n=3; Tac2 KO 23.33±2.10 min, n=3, p=0.13; post-NLX: WT: 83.33±12.02 min, n=3; Tac2 KO: 30±5.77 min, n=3; p<0.01) (
Tac2 KO animals displayed a markedly reduced LH baseline and number of pulses than in OVX controls (0-1 LH pulses in 120 min pre-NLX). The administration of NLX induced a robust LH pulse that occurred 20 min after treatment in all cases, with a peak that reached a two-fold increase compared to baseline (pre-NLX: 0.31±0.06 mIU/mL; post-NLX: 1.2±0.28 mIU/mL, p<0.02). While the limited number of LH pulses precluded an analysis of inter-pulse intervals; data suggest that NLX did not increase the duration of the LH pulse (pre-NLX Tac2 KO 23.33±2.10 min, n=3, post-NLX: Tac2 KO: 30±5.77 min, n=3, p>0.05) (
It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/858,479, filed on Jun. 7, 2019. The entire contents of the foregoing are incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. HD043341 awarded by the National Institutes of Health and FD005712 awarded by the Food and Drug Administration. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2020/036662 | 6/8/2020 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62858479 | Jun 2019 | US |
