This application is the U.S. national stage application of International Application No. PCT/DE2009/001194, filed Aug. 27, 2009, which International application was published on Mar. 11, 2010 as International Publication No. WO 2010/025704 A1 in the German language and which application is incorporated herein by reference. The International application claims priority of German Patent Application No. 10 2008 045 291.2, filed Sept. 2, 2008, which application is incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a knee arthrodesis implant having a femur nail inserted in the bone marrow canal of the femur and a tibia nail inserted in the bone marrow canal of the tibia, and wherein the nails are rigidly connected to each other by a connecting means.
A so-called implantable orthesis for knee arthrodesis is known from EP 1 529 493 B1 comprising a femur implant having a femoral shaft that is adapted in such a way that it can be inserted in the bone marrow canal of the femoral bone and a tibia implant having a tibial shaft that is adapted in such a way that it can be inserted in the bone marrow canal of the tibia, and wherein the femur implant comprises a proximal fastening end that is adapted in such a way that it can act in conjunction with a proximal fastening end associated with the tibia implant in such a way that a rigid connection of the two implants relative to each other results, and wherein it becomes possible to implement a continuous bone reconstruction between the tibia and the femur bones and around the proximal fastening bones.
This known prior art has the disadvantage that only a single possibility for a screwed connection is envisioned in the femoral anchoring head for the purpose of fastening the femoral shaft in place, which is intended to secure the shaft against undesired axial displacement. Furthermore, it is disadvantageous that the femoral anchoring head that is disposed on the tibial anchoring head is only secured by a single truncated cone-type screw that produces a press fit between the femoral and tibial anchoring heads. This type of press fit is only difficult to achieve under surgical conditions.
It is also disadvantageous that the known orthesis comprises a relative multitude of parts therefore requiring a correspondingly large distance between the bone fragments that are to be connected with each other, thus resulting in an undesired extension of soft tissue, muscle and ligament parts complete with the corresponding traumatizing effect. Moreover, modularity is rendered more difficult.
DE 197 22 389 A1 discloses a modular knee arthrodesis implant comprising a femoral stem part by which a femoral part can be coupled via a conical clamped joint and comprising a tibial stem part by which a tibial part can be coupled via a conical clamped joint, and providing that the femoral part and the tibial part can be rigidly connected to each other by a dovetail joint. A fundamental disadvantage of this known knee arthrodesis implant consists in the fact that two conical clamped joints are necessary each of which must be secured against axial displacement by, respectively, separate set screws. Moreover, even through a dovetail connection may ensure a rigid connection in the assembled state, during a revision of such a connection, for example due to loosening, material fatigue, anchoring in the bone, complications due to infection, etc., considerable problems may arise during surgery should a lateral shift of the tibial and femoral stem parts become necessary in order to be able to exchange parts. Moreover, misaligned parts require the application of large forces in order to loosen the parts, which is regularly an undesired occurrence.
DE 83 06 663 U1 discloses an implant for bridging bony defects in the area of the knee joint which provides that the femoral and tibial shafts are configured as two shaft parts that are rigidly connectable with each other, and of which the first part can be plugged onto a conical peg on the second part.
The disadvantage that all of these solutions as set forth in the prior art share is the fact that their lengths and angular positions are not adjustable, which results in considerably restricted modularity.
In view of this prior art, the objective of the present invention envisions describing a knee arthrodesis implant that increases the modularity of the implant by increased variability regarding length while simultaneously reducing the number of parts and simplifying revision surgery.
This object is achieved with a knee arthrodesis implant of the class as described in the introduction featuring the characteristics as set forth in claim 1.
Advantageous configurations of the knee arthrodesis implant are specified in the dependent claims.
The solution according to the invention is characterized by the fact that it is able to provide a modular system that is suitable for bridging large-area bone defects that have occurred due to one or several failed knee arthrodesis implant(s) and that has an abundance of variability with a minimal number of parts.
The transfer of the physiological maximum loads, in particular forces and moments, from the femur to the tibia is especially advantageously achieved if the connecting means between the femur nail and tibia nail comprises, in the direction of the axis of the nails, at least one collar-shaped module having at least two elements that are divided in the axial direction and detachably connected with each other and that configure together an axially extending passage for inserting a nail shaft in the proximal and distal ends of the passage, and comprising recesses that correspond to each other and that are disposed coaxially in the longitudinal direction of the module, respectively perpendicular relative to the axis, for receiving a tension means, which fastens in the tensioned state the respective nail neck exclusively by a frictional closure, in the way of a clamping jaw, with sufficient torque inside the passage. This ensures that a physiological application of force into the femur and the tibia can take place.
The present invention is based on the teaching that a collar-type module that engages on the nail shaft of the femur nail and tibia nail by way of a clamping jaw can achieve a line-shaped frictional closure extending along the circumference of the nail neck between the nail neck and the passage that will securely prevent any axial displacement and/or rotational movement of the parts that constitute the connection, even when larger loads are applied. The line-type contact precludes any fretting at the contact sites by arresting any back and forth movements. The line-type acting frictional closure is achieved by a profile texture that is envisioned on the internal wall of the passage, and wherein the neck diameters of the femur nail and the tibia nail are harmonized with the inside diameter of the passage.
Using the tension means that are disposed in the longitudinal direction of the module directly adjacent relative to each other, it is possible to secure the frictional closure by applying a correspondingly high torque. A sufficiently large torque is generated when the hexagon socket head screws are screwed into the recesses, which are envisioned with corresponding internal threads, using a torque wrench.
It is furthermore especially advantageous if the clamping-type connection between the shaft of the femur nail or tibia nail and the collar-type module is easily detachable due to the module's semi-shell configuration, even during a later surgical revision, whereby the traumatizing effect on the body tissues in the area of the arthrodesis is held to a very minimum. The surgery is thereby much simplified because all tension means are ventrally accessible.
Due to the variability of the length of the module, the implant according to the invention is easily adjustable to the varied requirements by different patients. Special advantages are also achievable, in particular, if modules of different or equal lengths are connected to each other via a module connector, whereby it is possible to considerably increase the length variability of the module that connects the femur nail and the tibia nail with each other.
A preferred embodied example according to the invention envisions an angling of the module from dorsal to ventral in the caudal direction, preferably between 5 and 15°, for adjusting the extension, flexion and valgus/varus positions of the joint, thereby achieving a slightly bent position of the stiffened joint and/or varus/valgus positions of the stiffened joint.
A further preferred embodied example according to the invention provides that one of the modules has a round anchor plate for support in cases involving with large bone openings.
In another embodied example according to the invention all parts of the implant, preferably the connecting module, have a rough surface in order to improve the integrative growth properties of the implant in the surgically treated implant area.
In a further advantageous improvement of the invention the outside diameter of the nail neck is adjusted to the inside diameter of the passage in the connecting module, and wherein nails of varying lengths and shaft lengths are envisioned.
All parts of the knee arthrodesis implant according to the invention are made of a material that is well tolerated by and resistant to the body, preferably a metallic material, for example titanium, tantalum, niobium or their alloys.
Further advantages and details are disclosed in the subsequent description in reference to the enclosed drawings.
Subsequently, the invention will be illustrated in further detail using an embodied example. Shown are in:
a to 3e a top view of different connecting modules of a kit of the knee arthrodesis implant according to the invention; in
The femur nail 1 and the tibia nail 2 both have a cylindrical nail neck 4 and 5 made of solid material. The femur nail 1 is rigidly connected to the tibia nail 2 by the connecting module 3, which circumgrips the nail necks 4 and 5 respectively in a collar-type manner. The connecting module 3 consists of two parts comprising two cylindrical half-shell 6.1 and 6.2 that are configured substantially identically. Both half-shells 6.1 an 6.2 define in their assembled state a passage 7 having an inside wall 8 with a profile 9 that is disposed perpendicular relative to the longitudinal axis LA of the module. Respectively four recesses 10.1 and 10.2, arranged next to each other, are incorporated in each of the walls of the half-shell wall 11 in such a way that the recesses are arranged coaxially relative to the longitudinal axis LA of module 3 and perpendicular relative to the dividing plane TE that is virtually fixed by the half-shells 6.1 and 6.2 so that at least eight recesses are assigned to each connecting module 3. An internal thread 12 is incorporated in the recesses 10.1 of the half-shell 6.2; and a hexagon socket head screw 13 can be screwed into the recess 10.1 of the half-shell 6.1.
The half-shells 6.1 and 6.2, together with the respective hexagon socket head screw 13 and the corresponding internal thread 12, constitute a tensioning means 14 of the type of a clamping jaw, which positions itself around the cylinder-shaped nail neck 4 and/or 5 when the hexagon socket head screw 13 is tightened, creating between the profile 9 and the nail shaft 4 and/or 5 a continuous, line-type frictional closure connection along the circumference. The outside diameter AD of the nail shaft 4 and/or 5 therein is correspondingly harmonized with the inside diameter ID of the passage 7. The resistance of this frictional closure against an axial or rotational displacement of the components can be adjusted very precisely and exactly by applying a defined torque to the hexagon socket head screw 13. A secure connection is achieved between the femur nail 1 and the tibia nail 2 by assigning four tensioning means 14 respectively to nail necks 4 and 5.
All tensioning means 14 are ventrally aligned and thus easily accessible during any revision at a later time without any need for traumatizing large areas of body tissue.
The connecting module 3 has—as shown in FIG. 2—an angling 15 in order to easily achieve extension, flexion and valgus/varus positions of the joint. The angling 15 can vary widely, for example between 1 and 30°, and is provided with openings 16 that can be used to introduce inflammation-inhibiting or long-term acting antibiotics.
a to 3e show different connecting modules 3.1 to 3.5 having different lengths L, such as, for example, a connecting module 3.1 with angling 15, a connecting module 3.2 without angling having one length L1, respectively, (
It is understood that the connecting modules 3.3 to 3.5, respectively, can also be provided with an angling 15. Whether or not there is an angling will depend on the actual circumstances and conditions involving the respective patient.
All parts of the knee arthrodesis implant according to the invention, except for the hexagon socket head screws, are made of a metallic material that is tolerated by and resistant to the body having surfaces of a defined roughness, for example of between 20 μm and 80 μm. On the on hand, this is intended to increase the friction coefficient of the frictional closure partners as well as, on the other hand, promote integrative growth of the implant.
Configurations of the invention are not limited to the previously outlined embodied examples. Rather, variants that may deviate from the described solution are conceivable, even with implementations of a fundamentally different kind.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 045 291 | Sep 2008 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2009/001194 | 8/27/2009 | WO | 00 | 2/28/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/025704 | 3/11/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3987499 | Scharbach et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4578081 | Harder et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4657550 | Daher | Apr 1987 | A |
4790852 | Noiles | Dec 1988 | A |
4846839 | Noiles | Jul 1989 | A |
4938768 | Wu | Jul 1990 | A |
5032130 | Schelhas et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5352227 | O'Hara | Oct 1994 | A |
5626580 | Brosnahan | May 1997 | A |
5658349 | Brooks et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5906644 | Powell | May 1999 | A |
6217620 | Park | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238436 | Lob et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6264699 | Noiles et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6299648 | Doubler et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6355068 | Doubler et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6428578 | White | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6440171 | Doubler et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454810 | Lob | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6613092 | Kana et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6669728 | Despres et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682568 | Despres et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6692530 | Doubler et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699293 | White | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706072 | Dwyer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706073 | Draenert et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6786932 | Blackmore | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6833007 | Lob | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6866683 | Gerbec et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7435263 | Barnett et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7776098 | Murphy | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7998218 | Brown | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8100982 | Heck et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20040024469 | Ferree | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040199259 | Pichon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050004679 | Sederholm et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050071014 | Barnett et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20090171463 | Brehm | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100241239 | Smith | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
33 40 767 | May 1985 | DE |
83 06 663 | Jul 1986 | DE |
89 03 850 | Jun 1989 | DE |
196 33 865 | Feb 1998 | DE |
197 22 389 | Dec 1998 | DE |
20 2004 015578 | Dec 2004 | DE |
1 004 283 | May 2005 | EP |
1 529 493 | May 2005 | EP |
1 529 493 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2 670 108 | Jun 1992 | FR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for parent application PCT/DE2009/001194, having a mailing date of Jan. 11, 2010. |
International Search Report for parent application PCT/DE2009/001272, having a mailing date of Feb. 10, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110208315 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |