The present application is a 35 U.S.C. §§371 national phase conversion of PCT/CH2006/000468, filed Jun. 29, 2006, which claims priority of European Application No. 05 019 288.9, filed Sep. 6, 2005, the disclosures of which have been incorporated herein by reference. The PCT International Application was published in the English language.
The invention relates to a medical bandage.
Conventional medical bandages are classified in three categories, according to their stretch properties:
a) Non-elastic bandages (bandages that are substantially fixed in length and cannot be stretched);
b1) Short stretch bandages (bandages that can be extended by approximately 70% of length by stretching);
b2) Long stretch bandages (bandages that can be extended by 150% of length or more by stretching).
Non-elastic bandages can be used to prevent a limb from swelling, while elastic bandages are primarily used for compression purposes.
Medical bandages are used in place of compression stockings when the limb dimensions are very unusual and standard medical compression stockings cannot fit properly. They have, however, the following disadvantages:
Hence, the amount of compression generated by a bandage is hard to control.
The goal of the present invention is therefore to provide a bandage that allows a better control of the applied pressure.
This goal is met by the bandage disclosed and claimed herein.
Accordingly, the bandage is formed by a knit fabric without inlaid yarns. In other words, the fabric comprises loop yarns but no inlaid yarns. The loop yarns are multifilament yarns comprising at least one first filament and a plurality of second filaments. The first filament has higher elasticity (i.e. can be stretched more easily) than the second filaments. In the relaxed state, the first filament is shorter than the second filaments. Hence the first filament tends to contract the thread to a length where the second filaments have excess length and e.g. form small loose loops. When the thread is stretched, the first filament is elastically extended and the second filaments are straightened. Once the second filaments are fully straightened, the yarn becomes harder to stretch and then the bandage acquires the mechanical properties of a non-elastic bandage.
A bandage of this type can be stretched in both directions, i.e. along the bandage and perpendicular thereto. Stretching is easy while the second filaments are not yet fully straightened and becomes much harder once they are. The transition between the two stretching regimes is, in the following, called the bandage's “operation point”.
When applying the bandage to a limb, the user can stretch it to the operation point, which is fairly easy to find and provides a predefined compression. When the limb's swelling reduces, the resulting change of force is comparatively small.
Further advantageous embodiments are described in the dependent claims as well as in the following description, which makes reference to the annexed drawings. The drawings show:
The section of bandage 1 shown in
Substantially all yarns used in the fabric of the bandage are loop yarns 2 knitted advantageously in a plain stitch (“Jersey stitch”) as depicted in
Each yarn advantageously consists of three constituent types of filaments:
a) It comprises at least a first, elastic filament. This filament can be elastically extended by at least 30% in length, advantageously by at least 50% in length. It is formed by a synthetic, elastic yarn, such as an elastan. Examples are Lycra (Dupont), Creora (Hyosung), or Dorlastan (Bayer). The first filament has a specific weight of 22 to 78 dtex. Preferable weights are 22, 44 or 78 dtex, depending on desired elastic modulus (i.e. elastic constant slope below the operating point, see below) of the bandage. The first filament provides the yarn with its elasticity as described below.
b) It further comprises a plurality of second filaments of cellulose and/or a cellulosic material, such as fibers of cotton, viscose, or lyocell. The second filaments cumulatively have a (metric) yarn number of 224-110 Nm, advantageously 159 Nm. The purpose of the second filaments is to provide comfort to the wearer. Cotton is the most advantageous material to be used for the second filaments. The second filaments have poorer elasticity (i.e. are harder to extend) than the first filament, i.e. it takes more force per percent of extension to extend (all) the second filaments than to extend the first filament(s).
c) Finally, it comprises a plurality of third filaments of a synthetic material, such as of polyamide, polyester and/or polypropylene. The third filaments have a total specific weight of 22 to 156 dtex, i.e. the cumulated specific weight of all third filaments is 22 to 156 dtex. An advantageous weight is 44 dtex. Their purpose is primarily to provide bulk to the yarn (as it is also a secondary purpose of the second filaments), while they are more durable than the second filaments. Again, the third filaments have poorer elasticity (i.e. are harder to extend) than the first filament.
The loop yarns are e.g. manufactured by an air-jet intermingling process as described in EP 0 818 567 A1. In such a yarn, the first filament (the elastic filament) is joined to the other filaments while it is in a stretched state, e.g. by being extended in length by 30%. In other words, when the first filament is released to its relaxed state, it is shorter than the second and third filaments and the latter form bends and loops to adjust for this difference. The technique of yarn combination could also be a conventional covering process involving an elastic filament as core yarn and the second and third filaments as covering components. The three components could also be placed side by side in a parallel manner at the knitting process.
The bandage is manufactured by knitting the loop yarns while they are elastically stretched by e.g. at least 30% in length. When released, the loop yarns relax into a structure as shown in
The bandage can be stretched elastically along the longitudinal direction Y as well as the transverse direction X. The stretchability in the X direction allows the performance of the bandaging process on an anatomic limb shape which is not similar to a cylinder. The loop yarns 2 are advantageously arranged in a plain stitch arrangement because this type of stitch allows similar extension of the fabric in both directions. Alternatively, other types of stitches can be used as well, such as a floated stitch or a tuck stitch if a stiffer elasticity modulus is required while using the same size of yarn.
When the fabric is being stretched, the loop yarns are first extended by elastically stretching the first filament and straightening the second and third filaments. In this region, the fabric's response is linear elastic, i.e. the extension is basically proportional to the applied force. Once the second and third filaments are straightened, further extension of the fabric is only possible by applying a much stronger force, i.e. a non-linear elastic region is entered.
This behavior is depicted in
In the shown embodiment, the extension where the linear elastic region ends before the non-linear elastic region starts (the “operating point” of the bandage) lies at approximately 30% elongation. When applying the bandage to the limb, the fabric should be stretched approximately to this operating point as described above. Stretching can be carried out manually or, more conveniently, by means of a pre-stretching device, such as described in FR 2 848 541.
While there are shown and described presently preferred embodiments of the invention, it is to be distinctly understood that the invention is not limited thereto but may be otherwise variously embodied and practiced within the scope of the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CH2006/000468 | 6/29/2006 | WO | 00 | 3/18/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/028263 | 3/15/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2574737 | Goodchild | Nov 1951 | A |
2902819 | Ross | Sep 1959 | A |
3306288 | Rosenfield | Feb 1967 | A |
4470250 | Arenz et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
5133199 | Parikh et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5256134 | Ingham | Oct 1993 | A |
7043329 | Dias et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7134265 | Shigemura | Nov 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
GB 983 719 | Feb 1965 | DE |
GB 2 104 558 | Mar 1983 | DE |
0161572 | Nov 1985 | EP |
0 818 567 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0818567 | Jan 1998 | EP |
2 654 925 | Nov 1989 | FR |
2 654 925 | May 1991 | FR |
2 789 301 | Feb 1999 | FR |
2 789 301 | Aug 2000 | FR |
2 848 541 | Dec 2002 | FR |
983 719 | Feb 1965 | GB |
1078440 | Aug 1967 | GB |
2 104 558 | Mar 1983 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080195019 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |